Post on 02-Jun-2018
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 1/112
PENTAGRAM | TILLOTSON | FALLER DAVIS | VICKSTROM | CC&A
| CIVITAS | MESH | ARUP
PROSPECT PIERSt. Petersburg, Florida
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 2/112
2
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 3/112
Contents
1 . Project Overview and Concept
2 . Team
2.1 Selected Project Experience
2.2 Organization Chart
3 . Analysis
3.1 History and Context (St. Pete Cultural Identity)
3.2 Urban Analysis
4 . Design
4.1 Program Aspiration Checklist 4.2 Activities Calendar
4.3 Urban Concept
4.4 Building Concept
4.5 Branding and Signage Strategy
4.6 The Uplands
4.7 Pier Design
4.8 Planting Palette
4.9 The Pyramid
4.10 Pubic Spaces and Circulation
4.11 Section
4.12 Plans
4.13 Elevations
4.14 Facade
4.15 Sustainability Concepts
4.16 Structure Re-use
4.17 Lighting
5 . Construction Technologies
5.1 Structure
5.2 Sustainability
6 . Permitting and Operations
6.1 Permit Compliance with Federal, SWFWMD and Pinellas County 6.2 Building, Fire and Zoning Official Information
6.3 Environmental Permitting Aspects
6.4 Utility Systems
6.5 Operation Impacts of the Concept
7 . Schedule and Budget
7.1 Design and Construction Schedule
7.2 Projected Construction Costs
PROSPECT PIER
3
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 4/112
1. Project Overview and Concept
PROSPECT PIER | 2017
EL CASTILLO | 800 ADPYRAMIDS OF EYGPT | 2600 BCE
MARKETPLACE ADDITION | 1987
TULUM MUSEUM | 2012
INVERTED PYRAMID | 1973
4
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 5/112
HISTORY
THE SYMBOLISM OF THE PYRAMID The first record of a pyramid dates back to 2650-2600BCE in Egypt, serving as a tomb for the common people and royalty
alike. In America, the pyramids of Mesoamerica date back to as early as 250-300CE, representing mountains and man’sattempt to reach closer to the realm of the gods, as the first architectural heritage on the continent. The legacy for creatingmonumental, aspirational architecture predates us all; the pure shape of a pyramid stands for a timeless, powerful and boldstatement for the generations to come.
THE INVERTED PYRAMID OF ST. PETERSBURG In 1973, the City of St. Petersburg commissioned architect William B. Harvard Sr. who turned the iconic pyramid over, pushingthe shape to its structural limits. Industry rose to the challenge of studying this shapes inherent qualities to devise a system forsupporting it along with a program of usable space. For decades, this Pier has proven itself worthy of occupation. In its heyday the Pier captured the magnificence and joyous spirit
of St. Petersburg. A sign of innovation, strength and pride, the building has sustained the test of time to provide generations ofpeople with memories, good times and pleasure. Built during a specific era of architecture, when the use of concrete and structural experimentation reigned, the Pier as it istoday appears bulky, heavy and layered. In the spirit of entering a new era defined by sustainability and reuse, the 21st century,the Pier shall become a reinvention of itself for a contemporary setting.
PROSPECT PIER TRANSFORMS THE LEGACY Rather than start anew, Prospect Pier recognizes the legitimacy of the original pier shape in society. Far ahead of its time, theinverted pyramid shape has been proposed over and over again in recent years through competitive international competitionsinvolving acclaimed design teams. The beauty of the context of St. Petersburg is that the Pier need not be reinvented from
scratch; instead, the Pier can be transformed, modernized and optimized to rise to the needs of a new audience. Founded in Mexico, home to some of the world’s earliest Pyramid settlements, FR-EE finds significant beauty and inspirationin the elegant form of St. Petersburg’s original Pier. Moreover, FR-EE’s team believes wholeheartedly in the necessity to bestewards of the environment, protectors of a unique setting and supporters of a new vision of the City. Without compromise, Prospect Pier has the potential to deliver St. Petersburg with a bold new vision for its Pier and to servethe community and new audiences alike. The following proposal is a responsible, economical, sustainable and contextualresponse to the City and community’s agenda for reinventing the Pier. We are excited about what potential it holds and areequally eager to engage with seeing this vision become a reality over the next few years.
PROSPECT PIER
5
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 6/112
2. Team
OSAKA MARITIME MUSEUM, JAPAN | ARUP
MUSEUM PARK, MIAMI | CIVITASSOUMAYA MUSEUM, MEXICO CITY | FR-EE
SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, SEATTLE | TILLOTSON
HIGHLINE, NEW YORK CITY | PENTAGRAM
THE SALVADOR, ST. PETERSBURG | MESH
2.1 SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
6
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 7/112
ST. PETERSBURG PIER
FR-EEDesign Architect
CORE DESIGN TEAM
FALLER DAVISEnvironmental
VI CK ST RO MCivil
CC&A Cost Analysis
AR UP
Engineering
MESH
Executive Architect
CIVITAS
Landscape Architect
PENTAGRAMGraphic / Interactive
TILLOTSONLighting
2.2 ORGANIZATION CHART
Fernando Romero, FAIA Lead Designer/Principal
Sergio RebeloDesign Director
Unai ArtetxeProject Manager
Mark JohnsonPrincipal-in-Charge
Chris ParezoDesign Principal
Tim Clemmons, AIA Principal Architect
Jenny Miers, AIA Project Architect
Patrick Green, RA Project Manager
Dan BrodkinPrincipal/Structural Engineer
Raymond QuinnLead Mechanical Engineer
Gary LaMonicaElectrical Engineer
Igor KitagorskyPlumbing Engineer
Vincent Lee
Civil Engineer
Cameron ThomsonLEED/Sustainability
Natasha JenPartner-In-Charge
Suzan TillotsonPrincipal-In-Charge
CORE CONSULTANT TEAM
Nicole CribbsEnvironmental Scientist
Bruce HasbrouckEnvironmental Scientist
Daniel VickstromEngineer
Robert A. KauppCost Estimator
Sanjeev MalhortaGeotechnical
Leonie Van GinkelFacade
PROSPECT PIER
7
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 8/112
HISTORY
Founded in 1888, the city of St. Petersburg has alwaysbeen defined by its waterfront setting. After a few fitfulyears of attempting to establish an industrial waterfront, St.
Petersburg made the eventful decision to convert the entiredowntown waterfront to public park in 1907. Between 1908and 1923 the small but rapidly growing town floated $1.3million in bonds to acquire and improve over 50 acres ofpublic park. Today, cities all over the world are working toconvert their urban waterfronts into public parks, but at thetime this was a bold and radical concept. Acknowledging thisvisionary undertaking, John Nolen, the most prominent urbanplanner of his day, labeled St. Petersburg America’s Riviera.
The park system was expanded and improved throughoutthe 20th century through the creation of the Pier Uplandsand Demen’s Landing as well as the creation of a “culturalcorridor” featuring a performing arts center, sports stadium,
marinas and three museums. Over time waterfront parkswere added north and south of downtown and today thereis over seven miles of public shoreline in the city’s core.Collectively they represent the third largest urban waterfrontpark system in North America and are considered to be thecity’s greatest physical asset. Landscape and lifestyle define this unique American city.St. Pete’s legacy of civic commitment continues today withthe city undertaking the development of a comprehensivewaterfront master plan while simultaneously creating a newPier. And as it has since 1889, it is our vision that the newPier will celebrate St. Petersburg’s special history, geographyand culture as a subtropical waterfront city.
CONTEXT
St. Petersburg, a city of approximately 250,000 people, iscurrently working with citizens and a multifaceted team tocreate its first master plan for the downtown waterfront since
the early 1900s.
Recent consensus from the meeting on November 13, 2014suggests that the public’s vision and desire to make thewaterfront “A National Model for Waterfront Stewardship,”showing interest in only small changes to the waterfront.
Anticipated to be adopted on July 1, 2015, the dimensionsand themes of the plan encompass:
1. Stewardship of the Waterfront Environment - A sustainablerelationship between the natural and built environments;
2. Enhancing the Experience of the Water - Expanding St.Petersburg as a waterfront destination for boaters and non‐
boaters;
3. An Active Waterfront Parks System - Diversifying theactivities of the waterfront to meet a growing community
4. Vibrant Downtown Places along the Water - Leveraging theeconomic potential of in‐water and upland areas along thewaters edge; and
5. A Connected, Accessible Downtown + Waterfront -Continuous linkages, service oriented parking + transit,increased public access.
1879 NAUTICAL CHART OF TAMPA BAY
SUB PIER PARK
3. Analysis
3.1 HISTORY AND CONTEXT (ST. PETE CULTURAL IDENTITY)
8
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 9/112
l
I I I
I
I
I I
I
PIER+ PYRAMID
UPLANDS INTERVENTION
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
I I
I
l
PHASE III PHASE II PHASE I
pier + inverted pyramidfuture development waterfront= prime real estate
culturalcorridors
marina beach +event space
INTEGRATING THE PIER
Recognizing that a new comprehensive waterfrontmasterplan is well underway, we offer these thoughts for howthe new Pier can be integrated into the greater downtown.
2nd Avenue North offers a unique framework in which toconnect the city’s public waterfront with its urban core.Stretching approximately one mile from the Pier (an man-made island surrounded by water) to Mirror Lake (a naturalbody of water surrounded by land), 2nd Avenue boasts arich diversity of assets. It divides neatly into four zones ofroughly equal length with a significant public space markingthe transitions. Between Mirror Lake and Williams Parks isthe city’s governmental center as well as an impressive arrayof religious and educational institutions. Continuing down2nd Avenue to Straub Park is a vibrant retail and lifestylecenter featuring Sundial and Beach Drive. From Straub Parkto Spa Beach is the Uplands, a potentially spectacular publicpark that is currently underutilized. And the last quarter mile
consists of the pier bridge culminating in the city’s iconicsymbol. Our team contemplates four phases of urban revitalization.The first phase focuses on the deliverables of thecompetition including re-inventing the Pier, re-buildingthe pierhead and bridge and creating small “light touch”interventions on the Uplands. Phase two would consist of theimprovement of the remainder of the Uplands as well as theimplementation of the recommendations of the waterfrontmasterplan. In addition to the east-west connection via2nd Avenue North, we recommend the city enhance thepark system in the north-south direction with an improvedboardwalk along North Shore Drive and eventually pedestrian
bridges connecting the Uplands to both Demen’s Landingand Vinoy Park.
REAPING THE FRUITS
One of the main goals of the significant public investmentin the waterfront is to spur continued private investmentwithin the downtown core. Initially this can be encouraged
by establishing a park-once transportation philosophy forthe 2nd Avenue North corridor. A new trolley line should beestablished in conjunction with the re-opening of the Pier thatwill allow for the Pier, the Uplands, Beach Drive and Sundialto be marketed as a single destination for both locals andtourists. This will allow for a consolidation of parking facilitiesallowing for reduction of surface parking within the parklandsand redevelopment of prime downtown land. The third phasewill see the continued beautification of 2nd Avenue Southwith the main goal being the creation of St. Petersburg’sRamblas – a major pedestrian friendly boulevard seamlesslyblending new and historic architecture into a vibrant mix ofcommercial and civic uses. Once established, phase four willtake place organically with continued spin-off development
radiating north and south.
STUDY OF THE URBAN CONTEXT AND 2ND AVENUE INCLUDING FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
TIMELINE OF PHASED DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO IMPACT ON THE URBAN FABRIC
3.2 URBAN ANALYSIS
PROSPECT PIER
9
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 10/112
192619061889THE MILLION DOLLAR PIERTHE ELECTRIC PIERTHE RAILROAD PIER
After the previous pier was destroyedby a hurricane in 1921, a new concretepier was constructed and terminatedwith a Mediterranean Revival stylebuilding that featured a central atriumand continuous viewing arcade on thesecond floor.
Due to the popularity of the RailroadPier another pier was built. Extending3,000 feet into Tampa Bay the ElectricPier was the first that aligned with 2nd
Avenue North.
Constructed the year after the citywas founded, the Railroad Pier wasbuilt in the current location of Demen’sLanding. Originally intended tosupport shipping, it quickly became asightseeing destination for locals andtourists.
THE PIER’S HISTORY OF TRANSLATING ITS CONTEXT
10
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 11/112
1987 20171973MARKETPLACE ADDITION PROSPECT PIERTHE INVERTED PYRAMID
In keeping with the then popular trendof “festival marketplaces”, retail spaceat the pier was more than doubled witha large first floor addition. A prominentglass enclosed elevator was added tothe front of the structure.
Due to the severe deterioration ofthe 1920’s bridge structure, a newpedestrian-friendly pier will beconstructed. At the landside end ofthe pier, the Pelican parking lot willbecome a new 5-acre park featuring a5,000 person capacity event lawn. TheInverted Pyramid will be re-imaginedand transformed into a potent symbolof the City of St. Petersburg for the 21st
century, absorbing all the history andprojecting into the future.
The Million Dollar Pier building wasdemolished in 1967 to make wayfor the innovative Inverted Pyramid(the 1920’s pier and pier head wereretained). With 40,000 square feet ofinterior space, the large fifth floor roofdeck offered expansive views of TampaBay and the downtown skyline.
PROSPECT PIER
11
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 12/112
AT THE END
ON LAND
BOTH
NEITHER/NOT SURE
BOTH
RESIDENTS
TOURISTS
COMMERCIAL
NON-COMMERCIAL
NO OPINION/NOT SURE
49%
i i i i l
i i i i i i
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i i i
i i i
l l i ill l
i l i i
l i i li
i i
i il
i l i
i l i
i i i
i l i i
li i l i
ll
i i
i l
l i l
i i
i
i l i
i i
i i
i
i
i i i i
i i
i i i l
il
il i
i
i i
i l
l
LOCATION OF PIER PROGRAMMINGCOMMERCIAL OR NON COMMERCIAL PIER
17%
13%21%
14%79%
7%
54%
WHO SHOULD THE PIER PRIMARILY SERVE
17%
28%
I
I
I
I
REQUIRED
I
I
I I
PROPOSED / INCLUDED IN THE
CURRENT DESIGN PROPOSAL
Pier Working Group Survey (July, 2014)
1. Observation areas
2. Open-air casual dining
3. Cycling / Jogging / Walking
4. Tram / Trolley
5. Fishing
6. Bike / Water rental
7. Courtesy docks
8. Performance stage
9. Flexible event space
10. Marine discovery center
11. Cafe / Snack bar
12. Water taxi
13. Environmental education
14. Picnic area
15. Non-motorized Boating
16. Shopping
17. Community space
18. Fine dining
19. Amphitheater
20. Motorized boating
21. Exhibition vessel berth
22. Support retail
23. Family entertainment24. Kiosks
25. Spa Beach to Vinoy bridge
26. Amusement / Ferris wheel
27. Water park
28. Banquet space
29. Fast food
30. Hotel
I
I
I
RESTAURANTS/RETAIL
NATURE/SPORTS
OTHERS
I
I
I I
OpinionWorks Survey (Dec, 2013)
1. Fine dining or destination restaurants 17%
100%
10%
10%
9%
8.5%
8.5%
7.5%
7.5%
6%
5%
4.5%
3.5%
2.5%
2. Air conditioned spaces
3. Observation and viewing areas
4. World class design that will be a landmark
5. Open-air casual dining
6. Areas for walking, jogging, and cycling
7. Fishing
8. Shopping and retail space9. Space for special events and entertainment
10. Environmental education
11. Boat and watercraft access
12. Amusement activities
13. Snack bars and fast food
Total
4. Design
VOTER PREFERENCES FOR A NEW PIER (OPINION WORKS SURVEY, DEC 2013)
HIGHEST RATED ELEMENTS FOR THE NEW PIER
(MOST IMPORTANT + SECOND MOST IMPORTANT)
CHART OF PIER WORKING GROUP
VS. PROPOSED DESIGN
Through surveys with the local population of St Petersburg, the desired use, programming, and clientele became evident. Asthe Prospect Pier is designed primarily for the people of St. Petersburg’s continual use through all seasons, our team designedthe program directly from these surveys.
It was evident that some of the important factors were:
A. An actively ever-changing programmed pier with both indoor and outdoor activities and spaces targeting the local andvisiting population
B. A place that becomes emblematic of memorable momentsC. Continuous programming along the full length of the pier and not only at the pier headD. Both commercial and recreational usesE. Considerable recreational activities for a variety of agesF. Transportation options to make the programming more accessible.
4.1 PROGRAM ASPIRATION CHECKLIST
12
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 13/112
Sports Cultural Food Nature Music
Yoga
Tai Chi Mayor’s Breakfast
School Field Trip School Field Trip
Pilates
Pilates
Pilates
Yoga
Stretching
Stretching
Meditation
Mangrove walk
Mangrove Walk
Mangrove Walk
Mangrove Walk
Yoga
Walking Tour
Walking Tour
Walking Tour
Fishing
Sea Observation
Sea Observation
Kayak Tour Kayak Tour
Kayak Tour
Farmers Market Family Fest
Paddle Board
LessonsFishing LessonsMirror Lake Tour
Mirror lake tour
Food Fest Food Fest
Yoga
Daily Movie Blues Night Stand-Up Comedy Movie NightShakespeare
in the Park Jazz in the Park Jazz in the Park
Late Fitness Late FitnessLED Light Show Movie NightAstronomy Night
M
O R N I N G
A F T E R N O O N
E V E N I N G
Museum Night Cocktail Demo
Wedding BanquetScience Lecture Happy HourNeighborhood
Meeting
l
l
Ill
l
l
l
ll ll
I
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
8
10
12
2
4
6
8
10
6 MaintenanceMaintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
l l
l l
Florida
Orchestra
in the Park
Saturday
Morning
Market
4th of July
Fireworks
St. Pete
Boat Show
Illuminated
Boat Parade
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
St. Anthony’s
Triathlon
American
Stage in
the Park
Mainsail
Arts Festival
Race for
the Cure
First
Night
Ribfest
in St. Pete
AVP Beach
Volleyball
Open
AIDS
Walk
Fish-O-Thon
SnowFest
Chillounge
Night
Festival of
StatesSunshine
Blues Music
Festival
Walk
for Life
Grand Prix
of St. Pete
Paddles Up
Boat Race
Movies in
the Park
Regata del Sol
al Sol Fiesta
4.2 ACTIVITIES CALENDAR
ANNUAL SCHEDULE
The building lighting system will accommodate celebrations of the city’s most festive events.
The Prospect Pier is designed to accommodate a variety of age groups, inclinations and schedules. It provides a platform uponand in which the events of peoples lives happen. From formal and informal gatherings of diverse sizes, to recreational activities,educational experiences, opportunities for exercise in groups or alone, entertainment and spectacle.
The spaces allocated for programmed activities are dispersed along the length of Prospect Pier. Each element of the Pier
however was designed to be actively flexible encouraging social interaction. Lighting design was integral to support thetransitions between spaces as well as the activation of its program and uses.
PROPOSED WEEKLY PROGRAMMING
Preceding the design, we analyzed the potential uses of the surrounding buildings. The table below is a speculative exerciseon how the population can explore this new destination.
PROSPECT PIER
13
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 14/112
MirrorLake
Children &Families Dept.
ChurchCity Hall Williams Park
CITY BUILDINGS
PARKING
SUNDIAL ST PETE
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN AXIS
SECONDARY CONNECTIONS
PROPOSED CLOSED PATH
RELIGIOUS
EDUCATION
CULTURAL
5 T H S
T R E E T
N O R T H
2 N D S
T R E E T
N O R T H
WILLIAMS PARK
MIRROR
LAKE
4.3 URBAN CONCEPT
URBAN NARRATIVEThe renovation of the Pier creates an opportunity for a mid- and long-term strategy for the redevelopment of St. Petersburg’scity center. Prospect Pier will be the catalyst for this transformation. Extending one mile from Mirror Lake to the Pyramid, 2nd
Avenue North creates a narrative that reveals St. Pete’s relationship between city and water. This promenade sits at the heartof the city and is framed by many of St. Petersburg’s most important institutions, private buildings and public spaces. Dividedneatly into four quarter-mile long segments, Phase 1 entails the rejuvenation of the eastern end. Building upon this success weenvision 2nd Avenue North as a world class Promenade gathering together both locals and visitors to enjoy its natural beautyand vibrant urbanity.
14
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 15/112
Museum ofHistory
Central Yacht Basin
Electric BusRoute
ProspectPier
Museum ofFine Arts
ete
2ND AVENUE NE
B A Y S H O R E
D R I V E
N E
PIONEER
PARK
DEMENS
LANDING
PARK
SOUTH
STRAUB
PARK
NORTH
STRAUB
PARK
VINOY
PARK
NORTH
YACHT BASIN
CENTRAL
YACHT BASIN
COMPONENTS OF 2ND AVENUE PROMENADE1.Mirror Lake & Civic Buildings | The lake’s beauty and surrounding civic buildings begin the urban narrative towards the Pier.2.Williams Park | Along with the adjacent churches, this park is a symbol of the city’s rich history.3.Transportation/Parking | In conjunction with improving the pedestrian experience, new clean transportation systems willinclude electric buses and bike rentals.4. Waterfront Commercial Center | Together Sundial and the Beach Drive boutiques and restaurants are a regional destinationfor lifestyle shopping and entertainment.5. Cultural Corridor | Stretching the entire length of downtown’s waterfront is an incredible collection of public spaces andcultural destinations all with views of Prospect Pier.6. The Uplands | Once it is improved this 25-acre park will define St. Pete’s relationship with its beautiful waterfront setting.7. Prospect Pier | The culmination of the 2nd Avenue Promenade, it is both a symbol of the city and a community gathering
place offering spectacular views of skyline and sunsets.
PROSPECT PIER
15
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 16/112
80’s additionof retail space
80’s additionof elevator
original inverted pyramid
water plaza
flood elevation
4.4 BUILDING CONCEPT
1 SELECTIVE DEMOLITIONDemolish the 1980’s additions to thepyramid. Replace a portion of the lostarea by adding new space on top whereit is more valuable.
2 STRUCTURE RE-USEExtend the structure in order to achievea purer shape and accommodatedesired programmatic functions.Existing first floor level 4.5 Feet in order
to elevate the building above the floodzone and accommodate potential sealevel rise during the next century.
3 LANDSCAPETerrace up from the pier head to a newgrand 2nd level entry thereby providingdynamic outdoor space for year-roundactivities including fishing, sunbathing,performances and picnics.
16
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 17/112
extra shading
observation area
extra shading
i l
l
l i
rainwater capturethrough enlarged roof
vegetated roof
LED lighting
solar panel
natural ventilation
city observation deck
city place bayside place
snack shack restroom storage
open air lobby
restaurant barcafeteria
education
wing
marine diversity
virtural aquarium
4 CANOPYExtend the exterior walls and roof toprovide shade for outdoor activities onthe pier head in addition to increasing thesize of the rooftop observation deck.
5 PUBLIC SPACEOrganize the interior of the pyramid asa natural ascension through the pier’sfunctional spaces via a grand centralstairwell that is the culmination of the 2ndavenue promenade. Tilt the roof structure
to the west providing spectacular viewsof skyline and sunsets.
6 ICON OF SUSTAINABILITYIntegrate a sophisticated façadedesign and sustainability strategy tofurther enhance the iconic characterof the building while maximizing itsperformance.
PROSPECT PIER
17
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 18/112
18
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 19/112
AERIAL VIEW
PROSPECT PIER
19
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 20/112
4.5 BRANDING AND SIGNAGE STRATEGY
The iconic shape of Prospect Pier offers a brandingopportunity for the city. The pyramid of St. Petersburg ispart of its history while offering a new vision for its future.Prospect Pier represents its citizens and translates the city’stopicality and proximity to the water. Beyond the graphiclogo, the branding and signage strategy for Prospect Pierdevelops a digital platform that engages the communityin an active manner. The digital interaction encourages a
symbiotic exchange between St. Petersburg’s citizens andthe pier administration. The branding and user interfacedevelopments offers an iconic design, experience, andlandmark to propel a new vision of St. Petersburg.
20
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 21/112
PROSPECT PIER
21
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 22/112
The design for the Uplands and Pier is fundamentally aboutconnecting people to their precious resource, their waterfront.The design is simple and pure. It creates a half mile longpromenade that maximizes human experience, transitioningfrom an urban environment, through a Coastal waterfrontlandscape, to the Pier and the Pyramid. The Pyramid itself isdesigned as an extension of the Pier and the city.
4.6 THE UPLANDS
22
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 23/112
PROSPECT PIER
23
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 24/112
FUTURE
LIVE OAK SAVANNAH
TURF LAWN
WITH PALMS
2ND AVENUE PROMENADE ALLEE 1 1
4
6
2
3
4
6
THE UPLANDS PROGRAM PLAN
THE 2ND AVENUE PROMENADE
The 2nd Avenue Promenade is designed to be a grand vehicular and pedestrian link from the inland Cityscape to thewaterfront. A formal ‘allee’ of Medjool Palms and pedestrian lighting lines the ¼ mile long street creating a grand sense ofarrival while framing the Pyramid building at the end of the Pier. Pedestrian walks, bike lanes and vehicular access are carefullydesigned to maximize access to the History Museum, Spa Beach Park and the Pier entry itself. 2nd Avenue Promenadeterminates at the Entry Plaza. The Plaza included trolley stops and an automotive drop-off turnaround and demarks the
beginning of the Pier approach accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, and trolleys.
24
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 25/112
TURE PED. BRIDGE
ELEVATED TURF LAWN / VIEW TO PYRAMID
PHASE 1
COMPARISON OF PIER FOOTPRINT
PALM GROVE,
CRUSHED SHELL BEACH
SLOPED LAWN(FRAMES VIEW TO PYRAMID)
PHASE 1
TERRACED LAWN PANELS(TRANSITIONS PIER RAMP
TO EVENT LAWN)NT LAWN
7
2
1
5
H
DEDICATED BIKE PATH 1
ENTRY PLAZA 2 ELECTRIC BUS STOP
3 RENOVATED PARKING
5 TRANSIENT DOCKS
6 KAYAK / PADDLE BOARD RENTAL
4 SERVICE ACCESS / LOADING AND
UNLOADING FOR EVENTS PARK
2 BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS
3 SPLASH PAD
5 TERRACED BEACH(TRANSITIONS PIER RAMP TO BEACH)
6 CONCESSION BUILDINGS W/ CAFE STYLE SEATING(FOOD & DRINKS AND BEACH/PARK EQUIPMENT: LAWN GAMES,
VOLLEY BALL AND BIKE RENTAL, FISHING POLES AND BIKE)
7 STAGE / PAVILLION
4 CHILDREN’S PLAY AREA
EXISTING PIER
PROPOSED PIER
THE THRESHOLD
Situated between Spa Beach and the Event Lawn, the ‘Threshold’ is the ceremonial entrance to the Pier. Demarcated byinwardly tilted lawn planes, the Threshold frames the distant view to the Pyramid while referencing the sky and the open andexpansive nature of the bay. It is designed to be beautiful and functional, connecting the Uplands to the new Pier elevation, aswell as connecting Spa Beach and the Event Lawn with a series of terraced beach and lawn planes.
PROSPECT PIER
25
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 26/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 27/112
TAI CHI
ELECTRIC BUS
STOP
BOATING
PILATES
COCKTAIL
DEMO
FOOD
FESTFARMERS
MARKET
JAZZ IN
THE PARK
SEA
OBSERVATION
BLUES
NIGHT
HAPPY
HOUR
SCIENCE
LECTURE
BIKE
RENTAL
LED LIGHT
SHOW
MOVIE
NIGHT
MOVIE
NIGHT
NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
COMMUNITY
GATHERING
ASTRONOMY
NIGHT
MEDITATION
PICNIC
PICNIC
VOLLEYBALL
CHILDREN’S
PLAY
FITNESSYOGA
FISHINGFISHINGCYCLINGJOGGING
8
7
CH
SPORTS CULTURAL FOOD NATURE MUSIC
volleyball nets and lawn games and temporary kayak and paddle boat rental center, with water access from the new transientdock located to the south, until a dedicated boat rental facility is built.
5. PALM GROVE CRUSHED SHELL BEACHThis crushed shell environment will create a visually distinctive floor that is excellent for hosting public events, strolling andrelaxing. This feature offers sand volleyball facilities and movable furnishings that allow for people sit and enjoy the bay andbeach activities.
6. COMPACTED BEACH TERRACESTransitioning the vertical difference of the Pier to the Spa Beach is a series of terraces beach planes that are separated byconcrete seat walls. This environment offers beach visitors flattened beach environments in an elevated position to enhanceviews and the water experience. The terraces will offer movable shade umbrellas that add a pop of color and atmosphere to thebeach. 7. THE TERRACED LAWN PANELSOn the opposite side of the pier ramp is the terraced lawn panels. Like the compacted beach panels the lawn terraces verticallytransition the Pier ramp down to the Events Lawn environment. Offering a wide array of park uses such as picnicking, elevatedconcert viewing and views to the boat slips, the terraces are pivotal to the park function.
8. THE EVENTS LAWNThe Events Lawn, edged by a continuous bay walk is a two acre living room of the community. This space is designed to hostmultiple public events with a wide range of scale and capability. The space features a grand open lawn that can support musicfestivals, pick-up sports, arts and crafts fairs, movie nights and community gathering. A grand stage is located on south edge
of the space against a dramatic backdrop of the transient boat dock marina. This location takes advantage of the terracedlawn steps as elevated viewing platforms and allows all passers-by on the pier approach to have an elevated view of all events.
PROSPECT PIER
27
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 28/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 29/112
PROSPECT PIER
29
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 30/112
P
P
AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION
TROLLEY CIRCULATION
THE UPLANDS CIRCULATION
30
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 31/112
BICYCLE CIRCULATION
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
PROSPECT PIER
31
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 32/112
4.7 PIER DESIGN
45’
45’
PRAIRIEGRASS
+PALMTREES
EXISTING CURB TO CURB
BIKEPATH
EXIST PARKINGPRAIRIEGRASS
+PALM TREES
EXISTWALK
DRIVELANE
DRIVELANE EXIST
WALK
45’
PIER APPROACH
LIVE OAK FORESTLIVE OAK FOREST
CROSS SECTION 1 - THE UPLANDS
CROSS SECTION 2 - LIVE OAK COASTAL SAVANNAH
32
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 33/112
45’ 26.50’26.50’ 10’
PIER APPROACH
SLOPED LAWN
TERRACEDLAWNSTEPS
SLOPEDLAWN
BEACH EVENTLAWN
45’
PIER APPROACH
PALM TREE GROVEPALM TREE GROVE
CROSS SECTION 3 - PALM TREE GROVE
CROSS SECTION 4 - THRESHOLD
1 2 3 4 5 61 2 3 4 5 6
At the west end o f the events lawn the pierbegins a gentle ascent. Over the next 400feet the pier approach raises 4.5 Feet inorder to elevate the new pier above theflood zone and accommodate potential sealevel rise during the next century.
PROSPECT PIER
33
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 34/112
CROSS SECTION 5- THE SPRINGPOINT
CROSS SECTION 6 - THE PIER
45’
45’
24’ 10.5’10.5’
75’
PIER APPROACH
PROMENADE
PIER
The 24’ wide promenade is primarily a pedestrian / bicycle zone. Trolleys will provide frequent servicebetween the pier and downtown. Service vehicles willbe limited to early mornings on a scheduled basis.
EDGE EDGE
TERRACED LAWN STEPSBEACH EVENTLAWN
1 2 3 4 5 6
34
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 35/112
OUTDOOR MULTIPURPOSE SPACE LAYOUT FLEXIBILITY
EVENT LAWN PROGRAMS
EVENT LAWN ACTIVATED FOR CHILDREN’S SOCCER
+/- 18 RECREATIONAL SOCCER FIELDS (6 VS. 6 PICKUP SOCCER)
EVENT LAWN ACTIVATED WITH CONCERTSFOOD TRUCKS INTERSPERSED WITHIN THE PALM TREE GROVE
+/- 3800 PEOPLE, STANDING
PEOPLE
FOOD TRUCK
STAGE
RECREATION VOLLEY BALL
CHILDREN’S RECREATION SOCCER
STANDING PERFORMANCE VIEWING
CRAFT FAIR / FOOD FESTIVAL
EVENT LAWN ORGANI ZED FOR ART/FOOD FESTIVAL
+/- 136, 10’x10’ POP-UP TENTS
10’X10’ TENT
TEMPORARY LOADING/UNLOADING
SEATED PERFORMANCE VIEWING
EVENT LAWN ACTIVATED FOR LIVE PERFORMANCES
FOOD TRUCKS INTERSPERSED WITHIN THE PALM TREE GROVE
+/-500 BLANKETS , +/- 5,000 PEOPLE
BLANKET (6’X6’)
FOOD TRUCK
STAGE
EVENT LAWN ACTIVATED WITH RECREATIONAL VOLLEYBALL
+/- 14 RECREATIONAL VOLLEYBALL COURTS
PROSPECT PIER
35
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 36/112
THE ST. PETERSBURG PIER
The desired objective is only possible if the width of the pier is reduced from 100’ to 45’. This results in two very importantexperiential effects. First is the narrow width reduces the visual foreground depth of the hardscape to create a feeling of beingcompletely enveloped by the bay thus maximizing the visual connection to the water on both sides of the pier. Second, thenarrowing of the pier dramatically improves the visual proportions of the pier and amplifies the dramatic sense of perspectiveto the Pyramid building and the pier head. The reduction in pier width also results in significant cost reductions that allow for
the implementation of more pedestrian amenities.
The design of the pier itself features elegant linear concrete and wood seating/shade elements that serve to provide forpedestrian amenity and protection from trolley traffic simultaneously. The spacing of these sculptural elements finds itsinspiration from the nearby Albert Whitted Airport to the south. Air traffic controllers still use Morse code to identify airports.Using Morse code to spell St. Petersburg creates a seemingly random pattern that provides porosity from one side of the pierto the other. An interesting rhythm and cadence is created for the pedestrian to experience as the procession to the Pyramidbuilding is experienced.
END POST3/4”, 316l S.S. STRU CTURALFINS
PANEL316l S.S. CABLE MESH
TOP RAILEXTRUDED RECYCLE ALUMINUM
8 ’ - 8 - 1 / 2
” S E C
T I O N
9 ’ - 0 ”
O . C . S P A
C I N G
S T P E T E R B U R G P E RIS
PIER RAILING DETAIL
PIER ELEMENT SPACING
36
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 37/112
SHADE STRUCTURES
FISHING STATIONS
PROSPECT PIER
37
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 38/112
4.8 PLANTING PALETTE
UPLANDS LANDSCAPE
LIVE OAK SAVANNAH
PALM GROVE
ENTRY PALMS
38
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 39/112
LIVE OAK, QUERCUS VIRGINIANA (80% OF UPLANDS FOREST)
MEDJOOL PALM, PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA
GUMBO LIMBO, BURSERA SIMARUBA (10% OF UPLANDS FOREST)
LIVE OAK SAVANNAH
PALM GROVEENTRY PALMS
CABBAGE PALM, SABAL PALMETTO(10% OF UPLANDS FOREST)
RED SILK COTTON/KAPOK TREE, BOMBAX CEIBA (SELECT LOCATIONS)
CABBAGE PALM, SABAL PALMETTO
PROSPECT PIER
39
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 40/112
TURF 1
TURF 2
CRUSHED SHELLS
PRAIRIE GRASSES
UPLANDS LANDSCAPE
40
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 41/112
MUHLY GRASS,MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS,PENNISETUM
CORDGRASS,SPARTINA BAKERI
BAHIAGRASS,PASPALUM NOTATUM
CRUSHED SHELLSSEASHORE PASPALUM,PASPALUM VAGINATUM
PERENNIAL PEANUT, ARACHIS GLABRATA
PRAIRIE GRASSES
TURF 1 TURF 2 CRUSHED SHELLS
PROSPECT PIER
41
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 42/112
CORDGRASS
WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS
MUHLY GRASS
PYRAMID ROOF LANDSCAPE
42
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 43/112
MUHLY GRASS,MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS, PENNISETUM
CORDGRASS, SPARTINA BAKERI
MUHLY
CORDGRASS
WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS
PROSPECT PIER
43
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 44/112
The new Prospect Pier will provide an active, iconicurban amenity for the city. Both a destination and a hubfor innovation, the enlivened structure shall exceed theexpectations while meeting the vision. A multi-modal pierwith enhanced Uplands and water access will activate thebody, while the Marine Discovery Center and various cuisinesin the Pyramid will stimulate the mind and senses.
4.9 THE PYRAMID
44
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 45/112
PROSPECT PIER
45
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 46/112
CITY PLACE
BAYSIDE PLACE
PROSPECT TERRACE
4.10 PUBLIC SPACES AND CIRCULATION
UNITING CITY, SEA, AND SKY
The Pyramid is framed by three new beautiful public places. As one approaches the Pyramid the pier widens into City Place.This square is the reception area for the Pyramid and the gathering point for activities within and around the building. Thisplaza relates back to the city to the west. Bayside Place is situated on the east side of the Pyramid. This plaza is dominatedby terraced steps that descend down thereby highlighting the waters of Tampa Bay. It is a place for informal leisure activitiessuch as family picnics, sunbathing, fishing and movies projected out over the bay. Above it all lays Prospect Terrace a stunningspace of cascading levels simultaneously providing spectacular views of the waters of Tampa Bay, the burgeoning downtownskyline and Florida’s soaring skies.
CANOPY
By extending the roof of the original inverted pyramid form, Prospect Pier acts as a new canopy for the pier head. ProspectPier provides additional shaded space to create comfortable areas for outdoor activities on the pier head in addition toincreasing the size of the rooftop observation deck. The studies below illustrate the shadows cast at 9 AM, 12PM, and 4PMduring the four seasons of the year.
FALL
SPRING
SUMMER
WINTER
46
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 47/112
THE JOURNEY CONTINUES
The masterplan for Prospect Pier creates a new urban narrative for St. Petersburg. As a culmination of this narrative, ProspectPier redefines the relationship between the city and its waterfront. The current Pier and Pyramid does not allow a continuouspath to experience the city, the bay and the sky. Prospect Pier, however, creates a new, grand public stair up to and throughthe core of the building thereby creating a fluid connection between the City, Uplands, Pier and Pyramid. This path finallyterminates on an enlarged rooftop observation plaza that is oriented to focus views back to the starting point of one’s journey.
More than just a beautiful building, Prospect Pier reaffirms the Pyramid as the symbol of a new St. Petersburg.
OPEN NATURALLY VENTILATED SPACE
PROSPECT PIER
47
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 48/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 49/112
0 15 ft 30 ft
OBSERVATION AREA
BAYSIDE PLACE
RESTROOMS
VIRTUAL AQUARIUM
RESTAURANT
PROSPECT PIER
49
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 50/112
50
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 51/112
VIEW FROM THE SEA
PROSPECT PIER
51
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 52/112
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas2700 SQ. FT.
City Place Bayside Place
Core1200 SQ. FT.
Retail2800 SQ. FT.Mechanical3200 SQ. FT.
PIER HEAD
TOTAL PIER HEAD 60,600 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 9,900 SQ. FT.
Pier Head51,200 SQ. FT.
Fishing Platforms9,400 SQ. FT.
Open AirLowerLobby
StorageBike rental Snack Shack
Bait storeElectrical room
Waterreservoir
+Water
treatmentplan
Cafeteria
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas2700 SQ. FT.
Core1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 3,900 SQ. FT.
Service Access(1st Floor)
Lobby
Cafeteria(1st Floor)
City Place Bayside Place
4.12 PLANS
52
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 53/112
LOBBY
ACCESS
PROSPECT PIER
53
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 54/112
54
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 55/112
VIEW TO THE OBSERVATION DECK
PROSPECT PIER
55
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 56/112
AREAS
Marine discovery Center5940 SQ. FT.
Common areas1260 SQ. FT.
Coast Office Space
Marine Diversity
IntroductionInstitutions
MarineDiscovery
CenterShop
Lobby
Core1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 8,400 SQ. FT.
AREAS
Marine discovery Center12050 SQ. FT.
Common areas1550 SQ. FT.
Core1200 SQ. FT.
V i r t u a l a q u a r i u m
H o l o g r a m a
n d p r o j e c t i o n
s p a c e
E d u c a t i o n a l P r o g r a m s
Interactive
areaFoyer Auditorium
Endemic species andnative landscape
TOTAL 14,800 SQ. FT.
56
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 57/112
MARINE DISCOVERY PROJECTION ROOM
SHOP
PROSPECT PIER
57
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 58/112
Outdoor dinning(40 seats)
ProspectTerrace
Destinationrestaurant(100 seats)
Banquetspace(200 seats)
KitchenBar
Outdoorcafe(30 seats)
AREAS
Destination restaurant & Banquet space9230 SQ. FT.
Common areas10370 SQ. FT.
Core1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 20 800 SQ. FT.
AREAS
Exterior Terrace16600 SQ. FT.
ProspectTerrace
58
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 59/112
RESTAURANT
OPEN AIR DINING
PROSPECT PIER
59
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 60/112
60
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 61/112
VIEW TO THE CITY
PROSPECT PIER
61
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 62/112
“The Prospect is for the peopleof St. Petersburg - for education,
entertainment and relaxation. It willbring the community closer together,growing the historic roots of the pier
into a vibrant future.”
“Prospect Pier focuses on what welove best about St. Pete – our beautifulwaterfront, our nourishing climate, our
vibrant culture.”
Mark Johnson
Landscape Architect
Tim Clemmons, AIA
Executive Architect
“The new Pier translates the historicsite into a vibrant destination becoming
an icon for the current and futurepopulations of St. Pete and its visitors.”
Fernando Romero, FAIA
Design Architect
62
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 63/112
VIEW FROM OVER TAMPA BAY
PROSPECT PIER
63
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 64/112
4.13 ELEVATIONS
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
64
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 65/112
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
PROSPECT PIER
65
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 66/112
GLAZING SYSTEMOperable Windows for easy cleaning from interior
EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING COLUMNSFrame new Windows
GFRC LOUVERSGlass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
offers great durability and
low maintenance requirements
METAL BRACKETS
1
2
3
4
5
FACADE ASSEMBLY
4.14 FACADE
Typical Use: Cladding panels where high level of detailing and a minimum thickness is required. Used for small non-structuralpanels, and typically fixed onto a backing frame or regular substrate. Panels may be also formed with ribs molded in to allowself-spanning behavior.
Manufacture: GRC panels can be manufactured in two ways:- Spraying - which allows higher fiber content and makes thin sections.- Casting - remix with max fiber content 3.5% and cast as for concrete. Moldable and non-flat panels can be made; repetition in formwork molds essential for economic reasons. We will look torecent developments in concrete formwork to devise a strategy with the contractor.
Durability: As there is no steel reinforcement present, GFRC panels have proved corrosion resistance in a marine environment.GFRC products have low water, water vapor and air permeability, providing a durability against abrasion, chemical attack,corrosion and ultra-violet radiation. They are also non-combustible.
MATERIALS
Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Glass fiber reinforced concrete (GFRC) cladding is composed of a cement: sand(typically 1:1) matrix with 2-5% volume of glass fibers added. These fibers area special Alkali Resistant Glass (ARG) to resist deterioration of the glass under
exposure to the cement. Further resistance to damage is achieved with mineral andorganic polymer additions.
Energy Star hurricane-impact aluminumcurtain wall system with double-insulated low-E glazing, operablewindows for easy cleaning from inside
66
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 67/112
3’-2”
1’-4”
1’-4”
FACADE ILLUMINATION
seating / step
continuous linear LEDOpt. 1: Ketra G2 color tunable
(interior location)Opt 2: LedLinear DynamicWhite or equal(exterior location)
glazing
concrete louver
25mm continuous flangelesslinear white LED(HESS LEDIA LL)
THE HORIZONTAL LOUVERSOFFER UNINTERRUPTED VIEWSWHILE PROTECTING THE AIR-CONDITIONED SPACES FROMDIRECT SUN EXPOSURE
FACADE LIGHTINGPYRAMID GENERAL ILLUMINATION
VIEWS THROUGH FACADE
STEP LIGHTSFOR LOW LEVEL WALKWAY LIGHTING
PROSPECT PIER
67
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 68/112
Rainwater Harvesting
Water flowing from the roof will be directed into atank within the building where it will be treated andre-used as non-potable water
High Albedo Roof
Vegetated roof with high albedo materialsreflects sunlight and keeps building cooler
Low-Flow Fixtures
Reduce water usage and discharge
Reusing Structure
Avoid sending large volumes of waste to landfill
and consuming new materials
Moderately Conditioned
ASHRAE 55 Adaptative Comfort
Unconditioned
Highly Conditioned
Conditioning Zone
4.15 SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS
LEED CERTIFICATION
The goal desired for this project is to achieve LEED Goldrating under the LEED-Major Renovations v2009. This projectcan also achieve Platinum Certification.
68
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 69/112
Optional Heat Rejection to Bay
Provides more efficient cooling mechanism andeliminates cooling towers on roof
Mixed Mode
Use HVAC systems only when necessary, and allowopening of windows and auto-system shutoff duringoptimal conditions
Natural Ventilation
Utilize adaptive comfort in flex spaces to reduce
HVAC loads
LED Lighting
Efficient LED light fixtures shall be used to furtherconserve energy and limit contribution to landfill dueto the long life of the lamps
Optional Solar Photovoltaics on Roof
Solar panels generate electricity for the building will provid-ing shading and keeping occupants cooler, and provideelectricity for the building lighting on facades
Battery
PROSPECT PIER
69
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 70/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 71/112
EXISTING PERIMETER SLOPING
COLUMNS GET REINFORCED FOR
THE ADDED ROOF LOAD
NEW PERIMETER COLUMNS
TRANSFER THE LOAD TO THE
EXISTING PERIMETER COLUMNS
NEW BEAMS SPAN DIRECTLY BETWEEN
THE CORE AND PERIMETER IN ORDER TO
AVOID ADDING NEW LOAD ONTO
EXISTING INTERIOR FRAMING
1
2
3
STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC DIAGRAM
PROSPECT PIER
71
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 72/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 73/112
water
LOW LIGHT LEVELwater’s edge
2ND AVE.
MED. LIGHT LEVELemergency vehicles
LOW LIGHT LEVELwater’s edge
unobstructed views
PIER SECTION
PIER PLAN
Rail lights for low level walkway lighting
Linear LED forunderbench lighting
Integrated shade + bench lighting
PIER
CONNECTING CITY TO PYRAMIDCustom street lighting post to reflectthe angles of the pyramid
2ND AVE. SECTION
PROSPECT PIER
73
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 74/112
74
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 75/112
NIGHT VIEW
PROSPECT PIER
75
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 76/112
30” DIAMETER CONCRETE DRILLED
PIE WITH 3/4” THCK STEEL CASING,
70’ LONG WITH 5’ ROCK SOCKET
36” DEEP X 30” WIDE CAST
IN PLACE CONCRETE PIER CAP
COMPOSITE ELASTOMERIC
BEARING PADS
1
2
3
18” DEEP PRECAST CONCRETE DOUBLE TEE
FDOT 18 WITH 20 STRANDS,
8’WIDE MODULES
4
COMPOSITE CONCRETE PLANCKS
ON SLEEPERS FOR DRAINAGE
5
FOUNDATIONS
The existing structure uses steel H-pile foundations to transfer its gravity and lateral loads to the ground and the new schemeaims to reuse the existing foundations. The higher building height and increased width increase the projected area of thebuilding exposed to the wind and consequently increase the load demands on the foundations. While, current estimates showthat the perimeter piles may be overstressed by as much as 35 percent under certain wind events, we anticipate that a detailedreview of existing construction data could demonstrate that the piles have adequate capacity. This review would include areview of existing pile load tests, pile driving records and pile hammer information as well as a corrosion assessment and waveequation analyses of the piles using actual driving data. In the event that such investigation does not justify sufficient capacity,the retrofit strategy would be to connect the existing caissons to the new pier head piles via grade beams. Depending on theresults of the corrosion assessment, corrosion protection measures such as cathodic protection may be required.
5. Construction Technologies
5.1 STRUCTURE
76
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 77/112
64’-0”
128’-0”32’-0”
0
BRIDGE
The existing pier is the most typical way to construct piersand the structure selection is driven by two reasons. Theshort spans and driven piles allow for leap-frog constructionavoiding marine equipment. Leap frog construction iswhen the next span is constructed from a crane sitting ona previously constructed span (even small piles as the onesput forward can be driven off the bridge if design correctly).The integral detailing (beams on the same level as piercaps with piles or pier caps acting as shelves) allow for adurable solution in the abrasive marine environment whileaccommodating easy construction of laying light beamsdown first and then casting concrete pockets after to make
composite.
The solution was further refined to allow for drilled shaftswhich reduce the noise during construction. The shaftsare more expensive to construct as they require marineequipment, but their higher capacity reduce the foundationfootprint by 45% (making them a great environmental option)and make them cost competitive with the driven piles.
The framing of both drilled and driven shaft solutions(20ft/40ft) spans allows to completely avoid existing (20ftspacing) foundation footprint. This is desirable for many
reason – it’s better to put foundation in undisturbed soil,and this will allow construction flexibility depending on thesolution for removing piles or leaving in place but cut off.
The longer spans of 40ft which are most optimal for drilledshafts are starting to fall outside the leap frog construction,but the marine equipment already in place to drill the shaftscan be engaged to lay down the superstructure. The longerspans of the drilled shaft solution make it competitive tointroduce pre-stress beams solution which is a great off theshelf solution but more targeted toward 30ft+ span lengths.
Lastly, the easiest construction method is that using FDOTstandard detail of pier cap below the beams which sit onbearings. The client has asked us to pursue this option.While recognizing this will facilitate construction, this maypose durability challenges in the future. An entire width ofthe bridge must be lifted between expansion joints (locationsto be determined) with marine equipment. However, notingthat this is a very low traffic bridge bearing replacement maynot be required for 50-70 years. The choice of this optionwill have no impact on the elevation of the bridge, as the 2ftclearance is above beams and not on the transverse pier capelement.
PILING PLAN
PROSPECT PIER
77
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 78/112
PYRAMID SUPERSTRUCTURE
The main ambition of the structural scheme for the proposedbuilding structure is to enable the architectural vision withthe least intervention to the existing structure as possible.Based on current engineering reports provided by the citythe existing super structure appears to be in good conditionand capable of sustaining current building code loads. Theexisting load path provided in the building directs all gravityloads from the concrete slabs to the existing floor beamswhich in turn transfer it to the interior columns, which lead itto the exterior sloping columns and then compile it all in theelevator cores at Level 2. (See Figure 1)
This load path manages to maintain most of the gravity
load in either the perimeter sloping columns or the elevatorcores and then congregates all of the gravity load into theconcrete cores at Level 2 which then lead it to the corefoundations and into the ground. Our aim is to respect thisforce flow and redirect any new gravity load to the elevatorcores and perimeter columns. This will avoid any interfacewith the existing interior columns and avoid reinforcement ofinterior building elements, keeping any reinforcement workto the perimeter of the building. This will be accomplishedby using long span floor trusses which span the whole waybetween the building cores and perimeter columns. Belowis a diagram illustrating this as well as one illustrating theincrease in load in the perimeter columns and concretecores. (See Figure 2 & 4)
There are multiple ways to reinforce the existing perimetercolumns for the newly added gravity loads and we can useany of them based on what the construction team deemsmost viable. We have suggested one concept option belowwhich keeps the reinforcement on the exterior side of thecolumns and does not involve any local demolition of theconcrete encasement of the columns. (See Figure 3)
Besides any gravitational loads, the building is also exposedto significant wind loading. All of this load is confrontedfirst by the façade, which then distributes it to the concretediaphragms, which then release it as shear to the fourconcrete cores. All concrete cores act in parallel to resist
this loading and transfer it as shear and bending to the corefoundations below. (See Figure 5)
The new scheme for the building supports the lateral loads inmuch the same way. However, since the projected elevationarea of the building has increased the total wind load towhich the building is exposed is considerably higher. Thehigher load as well as its higher elevation of applicationincrease the shear and moment demands on the concretecores. In order to verify that the existing cores will be ableto sustain the new loads, we performed a section analysisof the cores for the new axial and moment demands. (SeeFigure 6)
FIGURE 1
EXISTING GRAVIT Y SYSTEM LOAD PATH
NEWLY ADDED PROGRAMING
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
LOAD PATH FOR NEWLY ADDED AREA O NTO EXI STING STRUCT URE
EXISTING PERIMETERDIAGONAL COLUMNS
EXISTING CONCRETE ENCASEMENTFOR FIREPROOFING
EXISTING CONCRETE ENCASEMENTFOR FIREPROOFING
NEW COLUMN STEELPLATE REINFORCEMENT
78
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 79/112
LOAD PATH FOR NEWLY ADDED
PROJECTED AREA ONTO EXISTING
STRUCTURE
LARGER PROJECTED AREA
INCREASES SIGNIFICANTLY THE
WIND LOAD ON THE BUILDING
FOUR INDEPENDENT
CORES RESIST THE
LATERAL LOADING IN
FLEXURE AND SHEAR
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
UNCONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS OFTHE CORE CAPACITY
CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS OFTHE CORE CAPACITY
EXISTING L ATERAL SYSTEMLOAD PATH
LOAD PATH FOR NEWLY ADDED PROJECTED AREA
ONTO EXISTING STRUCTURE
DESIGN GRAVITY LOADS INEXISTING STRUCTURE
FOUR INDEPENDENTCORES RESIST THELATERAL LOADING INFLEXURE AND SHEAR
LARGER PROJECTED AREA I NCREASES
SIGNIFICANTLY THE WINDLOAD ON THE BUILDING
FOUR INDEPENDENTCORES RESIST THELATERAL LOADING INFLEXURE AND SHEAR
AXIAL LOADS I N STRUCTURE UNDERGRAVITY IN PROPOSED CONDITION
INCREASEDLOADS IN SLOPED
COLUMN
INCREASED LOADIN STRUCTURAL
CORES
PROSPECT PIER
79
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 80/112
5.2 SUSTAINABILITY
The redevelopment of St Petersburg Pier provides a great opportunity to integrate sustainability holistically in the pier and itsbuildings as a public project. Its relative isolation at the end of the pier makes sustainability a key imperative as utilities need tobe transported further and are exposed to the harsh maritime climate.
By reusing the building and much of the pier we are already making a significant impact by not sending large volumes of waste
to landfill and consuming new materials.
Our design also works with the climate to take advantage of the constant winds to provide cooling without less mechanicalenergy in various spaces. Working with the buildings unique inverted pyramid design we provide shading to facades to reduceheating loads while maximizing the roof area for power generation from photovoltaics. The redevelopment of the pier alsoprovides a potential opportunity to incorporate heat rejecting (for cooling) into the bay which will reduce our energy use further.We will also capture water for reuse within the building.
Sustainability has also been incorporated into the wider development with the introduction of public transport facilitiesincluding electric buses and bike facilities. More green spaces will also private greater public amenity as well as shelter andcooling effect for visitors.
1 ENERGY
Energy consumption is a critical part of any sustainability strategy for a building. Our focus here has been to work with theclimate to reduce energy consumption then produce power with renewable sources.
1.1 ADAPTIVE COMFORT
For over 50 years public buildings HVAC systems have been designed around the principal of: “Keep everything atapproximately 21oC and 55% Relative Humidity (RH).”
These targets work well because they:
• Are comfortable for occupants• Provide safe conditions for
practically every activity
However, meeting these set points typically:
• Requires costly HVAC systems• Consume relatively large quantities
of energy working overtime to staywithin the tight design limits (± 1-2oCfor the temperature and ±5% for RH)
• Where possible, spaces should bedesigned to achieve an Adaptive
Comfort standard, which accountsfor seasonal variation in naturallyventilated buildings
OCCUPANTCOMFORT
ENERGYEFFICIENT
ECONOMIC VIABI LITY
UNOBTRUSIVE
80
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 81/112
VAV / CAV
FREE COOLING POSSIBLECOOLING UP TO 120 W/M2
LARGE FAN ENERGY LOADS
Using adaptive comfort criteria for the St Petersburg Pier, some spaces can use outside air with little to no mechanical heatingor cooling for about 40% of the year. There are certain areas within the St. Petersburg Pier building where comfort conditionscan be relaxed due to the activities that will be carried in this spaces.
Dehumidification of outside air will be required for some spaces. The heating required for the spaces during the coldest part
of the year will help bring Relative humidity levels back inside the limits – meaning less specialized air conditioning will berequired. Using outside air for free cooling may be a viable option during some hours of the year.
1.2 HVAC STRATEGY
The building will be served by a modular air cooled chiller system, providing 150tons (5-duty modules) of 44°F chilled waterthrough duty-standby 300gpm variable primary pumps. These chillers will be located on the roof of the building, and can beconcealed by vegetation. Normally, the vertical discharge of the condensing fans cannot be obstructed. However, these is alsoan option to use heat rejection to the bay instead (see next section). Building heating will be through a single natural gas fired750mbh condensing boiler, which must be located in a rated enclosure.
Interior conditioning will be through two modular VAV indoor air handling units with airside economizer. A 20,000cfm unit willserve the restaurant, and a 22,000cfm unit will serve the remainder of the spaces. Cooling will be through chilled water coils.
Heating will be through hot water preheat coils in the AHUs and heating coils in the VAV boxes.
Space conditioning will be through VAV terminal boxes to serve the separate zones. Each VAV box will be provided with atemperature sensor. A central building automation system (BAS) will control all components of the HVAC system.
All AHU cooling coils and chiller condenser coils shall be copper-copper or be copper-aluminum with Electrofin coating.
The initial loads are based on the following:
• Net conditioned area: 32,800sf• Well insulated façade• All wall surfaces in the naturally ventilated circulation zone are insulated like exterior walls• No more than 40% glazing area
1.3 HEAT REJECTION TO THE BAY
The location of the St. Petersburg Pier on the water allows for the use of water source cooling/heating. The water temperatureof the bay will not be generally cold enough to provide direct (free) cooling. However, they may offer a lower energy alternativeto air-side heat rejection due to the lower temperature and higher specific heat capacity. Systems may be open-loop (wherewater is extracted directly and pumped through heat exchangers) or closed loop (where a pipework loop is installed on the bedwater body). With salt water systems, closed loop is preferable to alleviate corrosion concerns. The redevelopment of the piercolumns provides an integrated (low cost) way to reject heat to the bay.
PROSPECT PIER
81
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 82/112
1.4 SHADING ANALYSIS
Overheating occurs throughout the year as a result of the transformation of radiant energy emitted by the sun into thermalenergy passing into a building space. The St. Petersburg Pier building shape is already optimal as the building self-shadesthroughout the year. The following figures show the shading projection on an average summer and winter day.
1.5 ROOFTOP SOLAR
Solar photovoltaics on the roof will provide a canopy, shading occupants in some areas. Approximately 8,000 – 10,000 ft2 ofPV will provide approximately 180,000 kWh/yr in electricity for the building. This equates to approximately 25% of the building’senergy load. The system will still be grid connected but the PV system will reduce operational cost and potentially generate
income through net metering. The array will face South and be tilted at least 5° to allow water to drain from the panels.
CUMULATIVE SHADING – SUMMER CUMULATIVE SHADING – WINTER
82
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 83/112
SOUTH – WEST FACADES SHADING - SUMMER NORTH – EAST FACADES SHADING - SUMMER
Despite reducing the heat gains due to radiation, a high-performance envelope will still be incorporated where the building isenclosed to reducing the energy consumption.
Given the high amount of roof area and strength of solar radiation, a cool roof (highly-reflective roof) or potentially green roofsystem is an easy and effective strategy to mitigate solar gains.
Providing insulation, and thereby reducing the U-value (conductance) of key building envelope components (roof and wall,specifically) will also reduce cooling loads.
The following figures show the percentage of hours each surface is shaded on an average summer and winter day and showthe effectives of keeping the inverted pyramid design.
PROSPECT PIER
83
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 84/112
The glare effects from water should not be a concern. Water typically reflects 20% of solar load as it tends to scatter the light.In terms of glare, water does increase glare but it can be a pleasant effect. Its distance from the water will also reduce thiseffect.
The following figures show the percentage of hours the outdoor sloped areas are shaded on an average summer and winter
day.
2 WATER STRATEGY
The Pier water strategy is focused on reducing potable water used in the building and capturing run-off and rainwater forirrigation and other non-potable uses.
Water consumption in the building will be reduced at least 20% from a base design scenario by integrating low flow fixturesand incorporating metering and sub-metering to determine the amount of water required by a specific use, building tenant orcentral use.
Rainwater from the roof will be collected and used for non-potable uses such as toilet flushing, irrigation and maintenance. Therainwater tank will be located at the bottom of the structure.
The project shall include a comprehensive, integrated hydrology strategy to reduce runoff and the burden on the municipalsystem. The design will include green infrastructure systems such as bioswales, rain gardens, permeable pavements andgreen roofs that contribute to runoff reduction. These are intended to ensure that both the waters discharged from the systemmeet water quality requirements, while attenuating the peak flows associated with large storm events.
SOUTH AND WEST SLOPES SHADING - SUMMER NORTH AND EAST SLOPES SHADING - SUMMER
84
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 85/112
3 OTHER SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES
3.1 MATERIALS
Materials can have a major impact on sustainability in the way that they aresourced. The extraction and processing of materials into useful forms, delivery toprojects and installation are energy intensive processes. In fact, the construction
sector consumes 40% of all extracted materials. Whether a material is part of athe façade, landscape, bridge, building structure or machinery, a philosophy ofconsidering the life cycle of the material and also the contribution of its deploymentto the total design can be adopted.
Refurbishment offers an excellent opportunity to generate a supply of materialssuitable for reuse in either that particular refurbishment or during the constructionor refurbishment of other structures. These include large energy and carbonsavings that would otherwise be accumulated during the life-cycle of newmaterials; including extraction, transportation, refining and production of thesematerials. Other benefits include a diversion of waste from landfill and the potentialfor revenue generation and cost savings.
By reusing the building and much of the pier we are already making a significant
impact by not sending large volumes of waste to landfill and consuming newmaterials. Based on previous experience, projects can potentially achieveEmbodied Carbon savings up to 25%.
Our design also works with the climate to take advantage of the constant winds toprovide cooling without less mechanical energy in various spaces. Working withthe buildings unique inverted pyramid design we provide shading to facades toreduce heating loads while maximizing the roof area for power generation fromphotovoltaics. The redevelopment of the pier also provides a potential opportunityto incorporate heat rejecting (for cooling) into the bay which will reduce our energyuse further. We will also capture water for reuse within the building.
4 LEED CERTIFICATION STRATEGY
4.1 INTRODUCTION
LEEDTM, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is an internationally-recognized green building certificationsystem. Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED is a matrix based rating system targeted at buildinglevel sustainable assessment. Projects are scored against a set of standard credits and the sum of points determines the levelof certification (Certified, Silver, Gold, and Platinum).
LEED provides building owners and operators with a framework to identify and implement practical and measurable greenbuilding design, construction, operations and maintenance strategies.
TRANSPORTATION AND ACTIVATING THE PIER
Sustainability has also been incorporated into the wider development with the introduction of public transport facilitiesincluding electric buses and bike facilities. More green spaces will also private greater public amenity as well as shelter andcooling effect for visitors. By activating the spaces along the pier and providing shelter this will encourage walking and bikingproviding health benefits to users.
PROSPECT PIER
85
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 86/112
LEED v
Yes
Maybe
Not a tar
Total po
009
get
ssible credi
P
ts
ints
60
29
21
10
LEEDCertificat
LEED Sil
LEED G
LEED Pl
ion
ver
ld
tinum
40-49
50-59
60-79
80-110
In addition to providing strategies for achieving a green building, LEED certification can also be used as a marketing tool, sincethe project will acquire advantage over competitors and third-party validation of its sustainable accomplishments.
LEED promotes best practices in:
• Water and energy efficiency• Sustainable land use• Responsible materials selection• Improved indoor environmental quality
And can be used as:
• A framework for assessing design options early in the design process, and• A rating system for final building certification.
Since LEED is a performance based set of criteria, there are numerous design strategy options that will meet the LEEDrequirements. This design guideline for St. Petersburg Pier, will use the LEED criteria to track design strategy as a decisionmaking tool to keep the project on the sustainable design track. After considering different options for the LEED certificationprocess for this project, we reached the conclusion that LEED- Major Renovation is best suited for the project. As per the LEED
Reference guide, a major renovation involves major HVAC renovation, significant envelope modifications, and major interiorrehabilitation. St. Petersburg Pier upgrade will maintain the existing structure but the façade will be dismounted, and replacedwith a high energy performance envelope, as well as all of the systems and interiors of the building.
This design guideline will contain all the specific requirements for the design and construction teams to develop a building thatcan achieve the desired level of certification following the standard certification process:
The goal desired for this project is to achieve LEED Gold rating under the LEED-Major Renovations v2009.
5 LEED INITIAL ASSESSMENT
ARUP’s detailed assessment reviews individual compliance of each LEED credit and pre-requisite and it is based on informationcurrently available. The following sections outline credit requirements and their current status and intent.
Based on the credits classification indicated in the following section, the results of the assessment indicate that Prospect Pierwould attain the following score:
86
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 87/112
Minimum Program Requirements Project Status
The project building must complywith environmental laws
St. Petersburg Pier will comply with alllocal, regional and national legislationduring both design construction phases.
The project must be a complete,permanent building or space
The project is a complete building.
The building must use a reasonableproject boundary
The LEED boundary comprises theentire the site area it is owned by asingle property.
The project must comply with
minimum floor area requirements(1,000 square feet) gfa.
The building exceeds the minimum
required area
The project must comply withminimum occupancy rate
The occupancy exceed the minimumoccupancy rate of 1 occupant
The owner must commit to sharingwhole-building energy and waterusage data
The owner must submit the agreementat the time of project registration
The project must comply with aminimum building area to site arearatio
The building area to site ratio exceedsthe minimum 2% defined by LEED
5.1 LEED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
The LEED rating system establishes several mandatory requirements that must be met and accepted by the city of St. Petersburgin order to be eligible for any level of certification:
5.2 LEED CREDITS
Each individual credit has been assessed in this section for each LEED category.
The individual credit intent, the compliance requirements, the potential and assigned score, credit status and action plan areincluded in each credit assessment.
Credits have been categorized according as follows:
Yes: Credits already achieved with the current design or credits we believe that, given the characteristics and nature of theproject, should be achieved (These credits will require the design team and contractor to provide supporting documentation todemonstrate compliance during the certification process).
Maybe: Credits which require more information to be assessed or its feasibility is still unclear.
Not a target: Credits that are not feasible to be implemented due to site and/or building design characteristics.
PROSPECT PIER
87
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 88/112
PROSPECT PIER LEED CHECKLIST
88
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 89/112
PROSPECT PIER
89
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 90/112
6. Permitting and Operations
6.1 PERMIT COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, SWFWMD AND PINELLAS COUNTY
The FR-EE team will address the design of Prospect Pier for compliance with the demolition permit application currently underreview by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the existing construction permit obtained from the Southwest FloridaWater Management District (SWFWMD), and the permitting requirements by the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Code.
The placement of pier demolition material will require a dredge and fill permit from the USACE as concrete rubble is consideredfill. The project team will prepare a Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 permit application for the placementof the demolition material. The application accurately and thoroughly will present the project approach, the function andvalues of the unconsolidated bottom, and the benefits provided by the viable substrate. The assessment will include detaileddocumentation of the existing seagrass beds and a thorough discussion of the various project elements and the avoidance ofimpacts from construction activities and final configuration of Prospect Pier. Our biologists have extensive experience with thepermitting of artificial reefs, concrete breakwaters, fishing piers, and bridges.
The SWFWMD permit issued was based on the previous pier design and included 0.03 acres of seagrass impacts. ProspectPier does not include any seagrass impacts. As a result, a permit modification will be submitted to document the reductionin impacts. It is anticipated the demolition of the existing pier approaches will be in compliance with the existing SWFWMDpermit. Additionally, the surface water management system proposed by the project team is consistent with the existing
SWFWMD permit and will still qualify for the waiver for certification of compliance with state water quality standards underSection 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341.
Pinellas County Commercial and Multi-use Dock permit applications will be prepared for the wet slips and a Pinellas CountyWater and Navigation Dredge and Fill permit application will be prepared for the pier and the disposal of the concretedemolition material.
FR-EE’s project team will assess the option of placing the clean concrete substructure and decking for ecological restorationat a site just north of the Pier and adjacent to North Shore Park. The area shown in the figure on the opposite page isapproximately 92,000 square feet. A report presented in 2005 assessed the ecological values of selected dredge holesin Tampa Bay. The report concluded that the location identified as North Shore was described as the “most degradedbiologically”. According to the report, the site is generally 12 feet deep. The placement of material will provide viable artificialreef habitat.
Benthic surveys will be performed by qualified biologists to assure additional seagrass areas have not become establishedsince the July 19, 2012 survey. This effort will avoid unexpected permit compliance issues during construction.
Clear construction documents will be prepared to provide specific approaches for Skanska for the avoidance of impacts toadjacent seagrasses, including secondary impacts from activities such as dewatering, pile driving, barge and other water craftstaging and access.
90
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 91/112
NORTH SHORE
PROSPECT PIER
91
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 92/112
6.2 BUILDING, FIRE, AND ZONING OFFICIAL INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
Type 1B, fully sprinklered
OCCUPANCY GROUPS
A2 and A3
PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
13.25 (NAVD 88). The lowest horizontal structural member is at elevation 10.71. Because this is a Category III building (asdefined by ASCE 24-05) the lowest horizontal structural member is required to be at 9.74 (base flood elevation of 7.74 + 2.00).
OCCUPANT LOAD
1st Floor: 902nd Floor: 03rd Floor: 1104th Floor: 3205th Floor: 600
Total: 1,120
BUILDING HEIGHT
72 feet above the pier deck
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The renovated building has a total of 47,400 square feet of interior space and 27,000 square feet of outdoor terrace (notincluding the pier and pier head). At one space per 500 square feet, the building will require 149 parking spaces including 5handicap accessible spaces. The existing Dolphin parking lot on the Uplands has 312 spaces thereby meeting the minimumparking requirements. The Dolphin lot also has several parking spaces for large vehicles such as school buses. The Pelicanparking lot has been eliminated in favor of a new 5-acre park. Parking on the pier has also been eliminated.
92
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 93/112
SERVICE AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES
Emergency and service vehicles will utilize the 24 foot wide center lane of the new pier in order to access the renovatedbuilding. A public plaza on the west side of the building doubles as a cul-de-sac for emergency and service vehicles and
accommodates vehicles requiring a 90 foot diameter turning radius. Temporary parking in the plaza will be allowed by servicevehicles during limited morning hours. The new main entry to the facility has been elevated to the existing second floor viaterraced steps surrounding the building. The north portion of the first floor will be a service area with a loading dock and trashroom, both having easy access to the service elevator.
To service the new Event Lawn at the southeast corner of the Uplands, a new parking and service lot is proposed west of theEvent Lawn. This lot will accommodate approximately 40 cars and 4 semi-trailer trucks or buses. This lot is not generally opento the public but is intended for supporting the staging of a variety of different events and activities.
TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS
Two main goals underlie our scheme’s approach to transportation issues for the new pier. First, we are favoring pedestriansand bicycles over automobiles while still providing for reasonable accommodation for private vehicles. Second, it is critical that
the St. Petersburg Pier be better integrated into the downtown experience.
Towards the first goal the Pelican lot is being converted to parkland and private vehicles will not be allowed on the new pier. A trolley stop is located at the east end of the Dolphin lot and there will be a drop-off zone immediately adjacent to the trolleystop.
The new pier will be 45 feet wide and designed in a manner that seamlessly allows for pedestrians to have full access to thebridge. Vehicles will be limited to the central 24 feet. The central area will function as a woonerf shared between trolleys,bicycles and pedestrians. Service vehicles will be limited to morning hours and of course emergency vehicles will have accessas needed. The north and south zones of the pier will be limited to pedestrians. Between the center zone and the pedestrianzones will be an alternating series of heavy duty seating and shade structures to separate the vehicles and also allow the outerguardrail to be lightweight and transparent. Lastly the entire surface of the pier will be topped with a composite concrete deckinstalled at the same level to again allow easy access for pedestrians.
In addition to free trolleys running between the Uplands and Prospect Pier, we envision that premium smaller shuttles couldoperate at select times (i.e. Friday and Saturday evenings) and during special events (i.e. weddings, black tie dinners) for a fee.
In order to better integrate the Pier into downtown, we propose that the trolley route be extended to include Beach Drive,Sundial and the Sundial parking garage. Individually these are each local and metropolitan attractions; together they becomeregional or even national in scope. A park-once philosophy should be applied that encourages visitors to one location indowntown to visit others. To achieve this goal a free trolley running at 10 to 12 minute intervals needs to provide easy accessfrom one attraction to the next.
In the long term the goal is to better utilize St. Petersburg’s assets both public and private. For too long too much of theUplands has been dedicated to asphalt and too little for beautiful, functional parkland.
PROSPECT PIER
93
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 94/112
COMPARISON OF EXISTING PIER FOOTPRINT TO PROPOSED
The footprint for the proposed pier and pier head is 108,600 square feet which is less than half the size of the existing footprintof 226,000 square feet thus providing a design that is consistent with the existing SWFWMD permit.
APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF PILES IN NEW PIER
The selected structural system will greatly reduce the number of piles from approximately 1,500 under the existing pier to 125in the proposed design. The new piles are placed in rows with 40 foot spans in comparison to the existing piles which have 20foot spans. The new rows are offset 10 feet from the existing so that there will be no conflict with installing the new piles. Noneof the existing piles are proposed to be re-used.
6
32’-0”0
Existing Pier Head
Existing Pier
Existing Pier + Pier Head + Fishing Pier
Proposed Pier + Pier Head + Fishing Pier
226,000 SQ.FT.
111,500 SQ.FT.
Proposed Pier Head
Proposed Pier45’100’
64’-0”
32’-0”
0
6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING ASPECTS
94
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 95/112
AREA OF EXISTING SEAGRASS IMPACTED BY NEW PIER
The proposed design will not impact any seagrass beds. The construction documents will provide specific performance criteriafor the construction of the new pier to assure impacts do not occur in the adjacent seagrass beds. Specific criteria will includedetailed water quality monitoring to document the contractor’s successes during construction as well as seagrass surveysimmediately prior to construction and immediately after construction.
ROOF AREA OF STRUCTURES ABOVE PIER DECK LEVEL
The proposed roof area of the renovated pyramid will be 35,800 square feet.
CHANGES TO FISHING ELEVATION AND EXTENT OF FISHING AREAS
Generously sized fishing areas have been distributed around the pier head. We are proposing three fishing docks totaling 340linear feet and 3,700 square feet. The fishing docks are 6 feet lower than the pier head at an elevation of 7’-4” above mean sealevel. A bait shop has been located within the first floor of the Pyramid and has direct access to the pier head. Fish cleaningtables are proposed to be located on both the southwest and northwest fishing docks. In addition several fishing stations havebeen located on the Uplands and along the length of the pier.
’ ”
’’ ”
’ ”
’ ” ’
PROSPECT PIER
95
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 96/112
PROJECTED AREAS OF BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES ABOVE PIER
The only proposed structure above the pier is the main pyramid building and the stepped terraces leading up to the secondfloor. The railing to the new pier will be made of stainless steel posts and cables, so is not counted towards these calculations.The proposed projected area of the east and west elevation is 9,650 square feet as compared to the existing projected areaof 9,680 square feet. The proposed projected area of the north and south elevation is 8,620 square feet as compared to theexisting projected area of 17,124 square feet.
EAST ELEVATION
9,650 SQ.FT.
NORTH ELEVATION
8,620 SQ.FT.
96
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 97/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 98/112
ATLAS SHEET
98
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 99/112
PROSPECT PIER
99
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 100/112
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas2700 SQ. FT.
City Place Bayside Place
Core1200 SQ. FT.
Retail2800 SQ. FT.Mechanical3200 SQ. FT.
PIER HEAD
TOTAL PIER HEAD 60,600 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 9,900 SQ. FT.
Pier Head51,200 SQ. FT.
Fishing Platforms9,400 SQ. FT.
Open AirLowerLobby
StorageBike rental Snack Shack
Bait storeElectrical room
Waterreservoir
+Water
treatmentplan
Cafeteria
LANDSIDE ELECTRIC SERVICES
Landside electric services will include power pedestal(s) suitable for event connections. Event connections are estimated to benot more than a total of 400 amps at 208 volts. Parking and street lighting is anticipated to be served from an existing electricservice.
BRIDGE
Bridge lighting and power is anticipated to be served from an existing electric service. New loads are anticipated to beapproximate to the existing loads.
PIER BUILDING
An upgraded 2500A electric service from the utility to metering and free standing switchgear is anticipated to serve the pierbuilding. The conduit pathway and delineation of service between the utility company and building shall be reviewed andagreed. It is anticipated that the existing electric service pathway crosses the bridge, and that a replacement pathway will berequired.
Tenant metering will be incorporated at the main service equipment level. It is anticipated that the existing electrical room forthis purpose will be enlarged since the original service was smaller and did not have separate tenant metering. There shall be aquantity of 8 tenant meter compartments.
From the tenant metering compartments, 480 volt feeders will be routed up through the stacked electrical closets and out tothe individual tenant spaces. It is assumed that the electric service provided to each tenant will be terminated in an enclosedcircuit breaker within the tenant’s space. Electrical distribution, including transformation to 208 volts, specific to the tenant’sloads will be by the tenant. The common building services will be served via 2000 amp copper busway routing up through theelectrical closet stack at 480 volts. Individual bus tap boxes, mounted to the busway, will be required at each floor to servelocal 480 volt distribution panels. This shall include bus tap boxes serving each elevator, as well as feeders to major mechanicalequipment such as the rooftop chillers. 208 volts for common building services will be derived from 480 volts at the busway viaenergy efficient, K-rated dry type transformers. Additional branch electrical closets are anticipated specifically to serve Level 6and the rooftop mechanical equipment.
All wiring shall be copper. All bussing shall be copper.
It is assumed that any backup power requirements will be limited to those supporting life safety functions. Local battery packsat egress lighting and exit fixtures shall be provided.
100
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 101/112
Outdoor dinning(40 seats)
ProspectTerrace
Destinationrestaurant(100 seats)
Banquetspace(200 seats)
KitchenBar
Outdoorcafe(30 seats)
Banquet space i
ProspectTerrace
MECHANICAL
The building will be served by a modular air cooled chiller system, providing 150tons (5-duty modules) of 44°F chilled waterthrough duty-standby 300gpm variable primary pumps. These chillers will be located on the roof of the building, and can beconcealed by vegetation, but the vertical discharge of the condensing fans cannot be obstructed. Building heating will bethrough a single natural gas fired 750mbh condensing boiler, which must be located in a rated enclosure.
Interior conditioning will be through two modular VAV indoor air handling units with airside economizer. A 20,000cfm unit willserve the restaurant, and a 22,000cfm unit will serve the remainder of the spaces. Cooling will be through chilled water coils.Heating will be through hot water preheat coils in the AHUs and heating coils in the VAV boxes.
Space conditioning will be through VAV terminal boxes to serve the separate zones. Each VAV box will be provided with atemperature sensor. A central building automation system (BAS) will control all components of the HVAC system.
All AHU cooling coils and chiller condenser coils shall be copper-copper or be copper-aluminum with Electrofin coating.
The initial loads are based on the following:
1. Net conditioned area: 32,800sf2. Well insulated façade3. All wall surfaces in the naturally ventilated circulation zone are insulated like exterior walls4. No more than 40% glazing area
OSA Intake Louvers: 120 SF total(assuming 50% free area)
Exhaust louvers: 120 SF total(assuming 50% free area)
Rooftop air-cooled chiller (6’ x 35.30’)
(2) Chilled water and(2) heating hot water pumps
Boiler in enclosed,rated boil room(2.98’ x 4.07’)
PROSPECT PIER
101
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 102/112
TOTAL AREA OF AIR-CONDITIONED SPACE PROPOSED
Over five levels the renovated building will have 32,800 square feet of air-conditioned space. In addition there will be 14,600square feet of interior non-conditioned space and 27,000 square feet of roof terraces.
TOTAL AREA OF PROPOSED LEASABLE SPACE AND TOTAL COMMON AREA
There will be 27,200 square feet of leasable space, all of which will be air-conditioned. There is a total of 20,200 square feet ofinterior common area – 5,600 square feet that is air-conditioned and 14,600 square feet that is non-conditioned. In additionthere is 27,000 square feet of common area roof terraces. The 5th floor restaurant would have access to a large portion of theadjacent roof terrace for outdoor dining.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE FOR EACH SPACE
1st Floor – The lowest level of the building will have the main service spaces including loading dock, trash room, main electricalroom, rainwater cistern and general storage. Public spaces include the lower lobby and restrooms. The three 1st floor leasablespaces are a Snack Shack, Bait Shop and Bicycle Rental Shop.
2nd Floor – The entire 2nd floor is the Open-Air Lobby. Open to views and breezes on all four sides it is the main entry to
the building and is accessed by grand steps and terraces that surround the building and integrate it into the pier head. Amonumental stair continues the public pathway up from the 2nd floor.
3rd and 4th Floor – These two floors comprise the Marine Discovery Center. The main entry to the Discovery Center is on the3rd floor. In addition to exhibition space this floor contains the gift shop and administrative offices and support spaces. The 4thfloor continues the exhibitions which spiral around the perimeter of the building. Also on this level is the educational wing of theDiscovery Center and an auditorium space. The public pathway to the roof continues up through the center of the building withviews of Tampa Bay on the 3rd floor. Public restrooms are located on the 4th floor.
5th Floor – The top and largest floor is split roughly in two. The east half contains a large destination restaurant with the diningroom in the southeast corner and banquet room located in the northeast corner – both served by a central kitchen. The westportion of the 5th floor is an observation deck with outdoor dining enhanced by spectacular views of the downtown skyline.The vertical public pathway arrives at the 5th level where it also enjoys these same views.
Roof Terrace – Via two access points the 5th floor observation deck continues up and over the restaurant. The terraced deckis interspersed with subtropical landscaping and provides additional space for informal gatherings and decks while having 360degree views of the entire Tampa Bay area.
PROPOSED TYPE AND TONNAGE OF HVAC SYSTEM
The building will be served by a modular air cooled chiller system providing 150 tons off 44 degree chilled water through dutystandby 300 gpm variable primary pumps. Building heating will be through a single natural gas fired 750 mbh condensingboiler. Interior conditioning will be through two modular VAV indoor air handling units.
See section 5.2 for a more complete description of the proposed system.
TYPE AND NUMBER OF PROPOSED ELEVATORS
Our design calls for two new passenger elevators and one new service elevator. In each of the existing twin elevator shafts anew single custom width passenger elevator would be installed. These would be high efficiency, machine room-less, gearless,mid-rise elevators with a capacity of 4,000 pounds and speed of 200 fpm. Both passenger elevators would accommodatestretchers for medical emergencies. The existing service elevator would be replaced with a new elevator. It too would be a highefficiency, machine room-less, gearless, mid-rise elevator with a capacity of 2,500 pounds and speed of 150 fpm.
6.5 OPERATION IMPACTS OF THE CONCEPT
102
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 103/112
ST. PETERSBURG PROSPECT PIER AREA ANALYSIS
Area
PIER
Pier bridge 48,000 s.f.
Pier head 60,600 s.f.
Subtotal 108,600 s.f.
1ST FLOOR
Air-conditioned space 4,800 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 5,100 s.f.
Subtotal 9,900 s.f.
2ND FLOOR
Air-conditioned space 500 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 3,400 s.f.
Subtotal 3,900 s.f.
3RD FLOOR
Air-conditioned space 6,300 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 2,100 s.f.
Subtotal 8,400 s.f.
4TH FLOOR
Air-conditioned space 12,000 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 2,800 s.f.
Subtotal 14,800 s.f.
5TH FLOOR
Air-conditioned space 9,200 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 1,200 s.f.
Exterior Terrace 10,400 s.f.
Subtotal 20,800 s.f.
6TH FLOOR
Exterior Terrace 16,600 s.f.
Subtotal 16,600 s.f.
TOTALS
Air-conditioned space 32,800 s.f.
Non-conditioned space 14,600 s.f.
Exterior Terrace 27,000 s.f.
Subtotal 74,400 s.f.
LEASABLE SPACE (AIR-CONDITIONED)
Bait Shop 600 s.f.
Snack Shack 1,100 s.f.
Bicycle Rental Shop 1,000 s.f.
Marine Discovery Center 16,300 s.f.
Restaurant 8,200 s.f.
Subtotal 27,200 s.f.
PROSPECT PIER
103
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 104/112
Our team has reviewed the project schedule and is confident we can meet all of the required milestones. We hereby commit toexceeding the city’s established goals for quality and function while delivering it on time and in budget.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
2014
wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3wk4wk1 wk2wk3wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk5wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Consultant Selection Phase
Pier Working Group
Staff Commences RFQ
Public Outreach & Program Input
Issue RFQ and Receive Submissions
Selection Committee Shortlist to 5-8
Issue PO and Commence Concept
Develop Concepts
Technical Review & Comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
2015
wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3wk4wk1 wk2wk3wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk5wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Technical Review & Comment Continued
Selection Committee Picks Feasible Concepts
Public Outreach & Vote on all finalists
Selection Committee Ranks all finalists
Council Recommendation and Approval
Negotiate A/E Contract
City Council Approval of A/E contract
Design Phase
Concept Refinement Phase - cont.
Public Review & Input
City Council Approval of Concept Refinement
Commence Schematic Design
CMAR Pricing & Review
Commence PermittingDesign Development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
2016
wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3wk4wk1 wk2wk3wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk5wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Design Phase - Cont.
Design Development Cont.
CMAR Pricing & Review
Construction Document Phase
Negotiate GMP
Council Approval of GMP
Construction Phase
Construction Phase
Permitting
Permit Submission & Review
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
2017
wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3wk4wk1 wk2wk3wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk5wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Construction Phase - Cont.
Construction Phase Cont.
Tenant fit -Out & Close-out
Occupancy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
2018
wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3wk4wk1 wk2wk3wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk5wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2wk3 wk4wk1wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
July
Design Devel cont
Permit Agency - Final Approval & Isuance of Permit
Construction
JulyJanuary February
Basis of Design Phase
Permitting
Construction
Pricing
August
October
January February
J an uar y Fe br uar y M ar ch
March
Final GMP
Develop Concepts
October December
March April
NovemberMay June July August DecemberS ept ember Oct ober
Design development
Council Approval
SeptemberJanuary
Grand Opening
DecemberSeptember
Close Out
December
NovemberOctober
April August September November
May
May June
June
Negotiate A/E Contract
Public Input
Selection
Public Outreach
November
RFQ Submissions
April May
ublic Input/ Vot
June July AugustFebruary March
Selection Committee
Ranking
Council GMP Approval
Council Approval
Schematic Design
Pricing
CD Phase
April
Technical Reviews
Pier Working Group
Staff delops RFQ
St. Petersburg Pier Design & Construction Timeline
NovemberMarch AprilJanuary February July August September DecemberMay OctoberJune
7. Schedule and Budget
7.1 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
104
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 105/112
PROJECT: St. P etersburg Pier Replacement
EST. TYPE: Conceptual
DATE: December 15, 2014
TEAM: FR-EE
A B C D E F G I J K L M N O P
Total GSF/
Component GSF436,000
280,000 108,600 47,400
Uplands
Pier and Pier
Head The Pyramid
Base Design
Cost
QuantityUnit Cost
($/unit or %)Base Design Cost Cost/SF
DIVISION DESCRIPTION Comments D x E F / B
2A Site Demolition 1 208,500$ $208,500 $0.48 $208,500 $208,500
2A Selective Demolition 1 457,330$ $457,330 $1.05 $457,330 $457,330
2B Landscape & Irrigation, hardscape 1 2,492,250$ $2,492,250 $5.72 $2,492,250 $2,492,250
3A Structural Concrete/ 1 17,416,009$ $17,416,009 $39.94 $12,146,857 $5,269,152 $17,416,009
3B Exterior Concrete w/above $0 $0.00 $0
4 Masonry w/above $0 $0.00 $0
5A Structural Steel w/above $0 $0.00 $0
7A Roofing & Waterproofing 1 500,750$ $500,750 $1.15 $500,750 $500,750
8 through 12 Interior finishes 1 3,695,511$ $3,695,511 $8.48 $3,695,511 $3,695,511
14A Elevators 1 375,000$ $375,000 $0.86 $375,000 $375,000
21 Fire Protection, incl. underground 1 254,250$ $254,250 $0.58 $254,250 $254,250
22 Plumbing, incl. underground 1 278,244$ $278,244 $0.64 $278,244 $278,244
23 HVAC, incl. underground 1 516,800$ $516,800 $1.19 $516,800 $516,800
26 Electrical, Comm. & Security, incl. u/g 1 960,950$ $960,950 $2.20 $960,950 $960,950
99 Construction Contingency $900,000 $2.06 $900,000P TOTALL ALL DIVISIONS $28,055,594 $64 $2,492,250 $12,146,857 $11,850,657 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,055,594
QGen. Conditions/Insurances/Bonds/CM
Fees$4,800,000 $11 $4,800,000
RCONSTRUCTION COST
(P+Q)$32,855,594 $75 $2,492,250 $12,146,857 $11,850,657 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,855,594
COST PER SQ-FT TOTALS $8.90 $111.85 $250.01 $75.36
COMPONENT COST PER SQ-FT TOALS
$8.90 $111.85 $250.01
UTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
(R+S+T+Demo) $32,855,594
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET $33,000,000
SCHEDULE OF VALUES COMPONENT VALUES
7.2 PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
PROSPECT PIER
105
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 106/112
PROJECT : St. Petersburg Pier
LOCATION : St. Petersburg, Fl
DATE : 12/15/14
PROJECT # : 2014.132
PAGE : 1 of 3
DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL TOTAL COST
Preliminary Design Budget
FOUNDATIONS $4,516,300
Drilled Shaft 30" Pier 54ea 3,780 lf 450.00 1,701,000
Drilled Shaft 30" Pier Head 72ea 5,040 lf 450.00 2,268,000
PIP Cap 36x30 - Pier 308 cy 650.00 200,200
PIP Cap 36x30 - Pier Head 444 cy 650.00 288,600
Demo Existing Landside pier structure 39,000 sf 1.50 58,500
SUBSTRUCTURE $4,856,250
Precast Dbl Tees - Pier 49,000 sf 35.00 1,715,000
Precast Dbl Tees - Pier Head 62,000 sf 35.00 2,170,000
6" Precast Deck - Pier 953 cy 450.00 428,750
6" PIP Conc Deck - Pier Head 1,206 cy 450.00 542,500
BUILDING STRUCTURE $4,175,000
Structure Rehab - Pyramid 39,000 sf 35.00 1,365,000
Structure New - Pyramid 23,500 sf 100.00 2,350,000
Monumental Stairs - Pyramid 4 flts 50,000.00 200,000
Stairs/Handrails - Pyramid 400 risers 650.00 260,000
EXTERIOR CLOSURE $3,927,000
Alum/Glass - Pyramid 19,200 sf 110.00 2,112,000
GFRC - Pyramid 16,500 sf 110.00 1,815,000
106
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 107/112
PROJECT : St. Petersburg Pier
LOCATION : St. Petersburg, Fl
DATE : 12/15/14
PROJECT # : 2014.132
PAGE : 2 of 3
DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL TOTAL COST
Preliminary Design Budget
MOISTURE PROTECTION $500,750
Waterproofing - Pyramid 8,500 sf 3.50 29,750
Roofing - Pyramid 30,000 sf 12.50 375,000
Green Roof 2,400 sf 40.00 96,000
INTERIOR FINISHES CONSTRUCTION $1,361,830
Interior Selective Demolition 45,733 sf 10.00 457,330
Finished Interior 17,200 sf 30.00 516,000
Shell Space 25,900 sf 15.00 388,500
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $2,791,011
Specialties 44,761 sf 1.00 44,761
Equipment 1 ls 10,000.00 10,000
Traffic Barrier/Conc Seating - Pier 2,200 lf 150.00 330,000
Railings - Pier 2,200 lf 125.00 275,000
Railings - Pyramid 700 lf 125.00 87,500
Traffic Decks - Pier 76,000 sf 25.00 1,900,000
Railings - Pier, floors 5&6 1,150 lf 125.00 143,750
F.F. & E. - N.I.C.
Seagrass mitigation - None
CONVEYING SYSTEMS $375,000
Traction Elevator 3500lb 15 stop 25,000.00 375,000
MECHANICAL $1,049,244
Fire Sprinkler Sys 55,000 sf 3.00 165,000
FS Piping to Landside 1,230 lf 40.00 49,200
Fire Pump Tower 1 ls 40,000.00 40,000
Plumbing System 44,761 sf 4.00 179,044
Plb Lift Station & Grease Trap 1 ls 50,000.00 50,000
Plb Piping to Landside 1,230 lf 40.00 49,200
HVAC System - A/C space 17,200 sf 18.00 309,600
HVAC System - Shell space 25,900 sf 8.00 207,200
PROSPECT PIER
107
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 108/112
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 109/112
PROSPECT PIER
109
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 110/112
110
8/10/2019 St. Pete Pier Proposal: Prospect Pier
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/st-pete-pier-proposal-prospect-pier 111/112
Natasha Jen
Larissa Marquez
Daniel Vickstrom
Nicole Cribbs
Bruce Hashbrouck
Suzan Tillotson
Robert A. Kaupp
Tim Clemmons
Gary GroomsJenny Miers
Fernando Romero
Sergio Rebelo Yuri Jeong
Celia Julve
Francisco Rocha
Alex Zee
Qingyi Chen
Joao Urbano
Feifei Song
Wen Zhu
Jessica Wang
Unai Artetxe
Sunny Wang
Daniela Gallo
Fatimah Azzahra
Christopher Shelley
MESHFR-EE/ FERNANDO
ROMERO ENTERPRISE
COMPETITION TEAM
FALLER DAVISTILLOTSON
CC&A
PENTAGRAM
VICKSTROM
ARUP
CIVITAS
Daniel Brodkin
Sanya Levi Vincent Lee
Sanjeev Malhotra
Cameron Thomson
Nubia Herrera
Mark Johnson
Chris Parezo
Ilana Fowler
PROSPECT PIER
111