Software Reliability

Post on 30-Dec-2015

18 views 0 download

description

Software Reliability. 25 September 2006. About the Evening Lectures. Viewing is required All lectures will be recorded and shown during a regular class period Working on getting them posted on the web so that you can download them at other times as well Sign in sheet at lecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Software Reliability

Software Reliability25 September 2006

About the Evening Lectures Viewing is required

All lectures will be recorded and shown during a regular class period

Working on getting them posted on the web so that you can download them at other times as well

Sign in sheet at lecture Assignment: two paragraph summary of what

you learned Dinner lottery

About the Midterm Use of Blackboard

http://help.unc.edu/?id=4735&trail=4781 Installing SecureExam (see Guidelines on

home page) Later this week, I will post a dummy exam

that you are all to take BEFORE the midterm to assure that everything is working properly

Simplified Model of a Computer

processor

instructions data

the information that it works

on

defines an

algorithm

retrieves the instruction directs data movement

Control Unit

Arithmetic Logic Unit

MEMORY

Performs the operations

Points to Remember Computers access information by location and

doesn’t know the value Computers store numbers in fixed size

packets, which means that they can not grow indefinitely

Computers do not distinguish between different types of data (e.g., instructions or text or numbers)

Review: Computerized Systems Finance: banking; stock market; commerce

Medical: diagnostics; life support; medical devices

Communications: television; radio; news; networks Transportation: traffic signals; air traffic control; air craft; space craft;

trains; cars

Military: weapons systems; intelligence gathering

Energy: power plants; toxic chemical plants; oil & gas Water: sewer

Buildings: HVAC; security; lights

Personal & household items

What is a Bug?

Bug Problems in code that cause it to behave in an

unintended, unanticipated or unpredictable manner

Origin Grace Hopper (1947): moth in a relay

"First actual case of bug being found."

Thomas Edison used the term in 1878 "Bugs"—as such little faults and difficulties are called—

1906-1992

First Computer Bug

Why are bugs hard to find? The error can appear in another program

Device drivers, memory management The error may only occur occasionally

May require multiple conditions to occur

Classes of Problems Poorly designed software Poorly understood requirements Poorly designed user interfaces Improper use Data entry problems Simple coding errors

80% of software projects fail

50% challenged 2x budget 2x completion time 2/3 planned function

30% impaired Scrapped

Standish Group, 1995

Sources of Risk1. Top management commitment

2. User commitment

3. Misunderstood requirements

4. Inadequate user involvement

5. Mismanaged user expectations

6. Scope creep

7. Lack of knowledge or skill Keil et al, “A Framework for Identifying Software Project

Risks,” CACM 41:11, November 1998.

Can’t We Test Out the Problems? In order to establish that the probability of failure of

software is less than 10-9 in 10 hours, testing required with one computer is greater than 1 million years

Butler and Finelli, “The Infeasibility of Experimental Quantification of Life-Critical Software Reliability”

NIST estimates cost to US economy from inadequate software testing > $59 billion/yr.

NIST Planning Report 02-3

Simple Problems Tampa couple was billed $4,062,599.57 for a

month’s electricity Correct bill was $146.76 Input error – clearly not good enough check for

reasonable values High School freshman banned from football because

of drug use in middle school Actual offense was chewing gum and being tardy Different codes not properly translated - systems are only

as good as their weakest links

User Interface Bug Usability Issue Afghanistan War (December 2001)

Friendly fire kills 3 injures 20 when satellite-guided bomb landed on a battalion command post

Use of GPS Receiver to determine coordinators Change battery What should come up?

www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8853-2002Mar23

Denver Airport Baggage System (1995) 4 years in development at cost of $193M The promise

delivered in < 10 minutes to any part of airport! Massively complex system

4000 cars 21 miles of track scanners photocells 300 computers

What happened: misrouted and crashed, baggage lost and damaged Delayed opening cost $1.1M/day When airport opened a year late only one airline used the system

www.cis.gsu.edu/~mmoore/CIS3300/handouts/SciAmSept1994.html

Denver Airport Baggage System (1995) 4 years in development at cost of $193M Massively complex system

4000 cars, 21 miles of track, scanners, photocells, 300 computers

Cars misrouted and crashed, baggage lost and damaged Delayed opening cost $1.1M/day When airport opened a year late only one airline used it

www.cis.gsu.edu/~mmoore/CIS3300/handouts/SciAmSept1994.html

Denver Airport System Examples of bugs:

Photocell could not detect bags on the belt and therefore didn’t stop system

System had lost track of state of carts during jams Timing between conveyor belts and carts not

properly synchronized Overall

Not just software glitches very complex, poorly engineered system

Ariane 5 (1996)

Integer overflowSoftware error

External view

Only about 40 seconds after initiation of the flight sequence, at an altitude of about 3700 m, the launcher veered off its flight path, broke up and exploded

External view

Cost

Development cost $7 Billion Delay of more than one year

One set of four identical, uninsured scientific satellites

+ One rocket

$500,000,000

What Happened? Overflow: tried to put too big a number into

too small a space Even worse – the feature that caused the

problem wasn’t needed! It was only needed to set up the launch!

archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/contract/ariane/page.html

Bank of New YorkNovember 20, 1985

BoNY: Nation’s largest clearer of Govt securities.

Software to track Federal securities transactions wrote new information on top of old.

Feds debited the bank for each transaction but bank did not know who owed it how much.

90 minutes => $32 Billion overdraft!

Cost of Bug Bank had to borrow $24 billion from federal

reserves. Interest paid ~$5 million for 1 day. (Annual earnings of bank ~120 million)

BoNY share prices dropped by 25¢ Federal funds rate dropped from 8.4% to

5.5% System down for 28 hours. Fear of financial crisis caused increase in

price of platinum!

Cause of bug Message buffer counter at BoNY system was

16-bit long. Counters at Fed (and other banks) 32 bit. More than 32,000 transactions that morning!

=>Counter overflow Securities database corrupted.

The Drama continues… Trying to correct it – they copied corrupted

data over the backup. Lost a few hours because of this.

Reference: Wiener, Digital Woes, 1993

Therac-25 Landmark case of how things can go terribly wrong Medical linear accelerator: radiation therapy for

cancer patients Used to zap tumors with high energy beams

Electron beams for shallow tissue X-ray photons for deeper tissue

Eleven Therac-25s were installed: Six in Canada Five in the United States

Developed by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL).

Therac-25 Improvements over Therac-20:

Uses new “double pass” technique to accelerate electrons.

Machine itself takes up less space. Other differences from the Therac-20:

Software now coupled to the rest of the system and responsible for safety checks. Hardware safety interlocks removed.

“Easier to use.”

Therac-25 Turntable

Counterweight

Field Light Mirror

Beam Flattener (X-ray Mode)

Scan Magnet (Electron Mode)

Turntable

1985-1987: Six known accidents Jun 1985: Patient at Mareitta GA received

overdose July 1985: Hamilton, Ontario: patient

severely burned, died that November. December 1985: Patient in Yakima, WA

overdose

Vernon Kidd Early March 1986, Tyler, Tx:

receives dose > 100 times too high Complained he felt burned…..

Engineer: It’s not possible for Therac-25 to give an overdose.

Engineering firm: Machine does not appear capable of giving a patient an electrical shock...

Died 5 months later

Put back in use late March

What Went Wrong? User Interface

Operator entered code for high energy rather than low energy

“Malfunction message” Operator entered “Proceed” because system was

known to give quirky errors Result

Turntable was in the wrong position

3 Weeks Later: Ray Cox Second accident in Tyler, Tx

Same operator

Patient died 1 month later

This time they were able to reproduce

What would cause that to happen? Race conditions.

Several different race condition bugs. Overflow error.

The turntable position was not checked every 256th time the “Class3” variable is incremented.

No hardware safety interlocks. Wrong information on the console. Non-descriptive error messages.

“Malfunction 54” “H-tilt”

User-override-able error modes.

Source of the Bug Incompetent engineering. Safety analysis excluded the software! No usability testing.

Sources Leveson, N., Turner, C. S., An Investigation of the Therac-25

Accidents. IEEE Computer, Vol. 26, No. 7, July 1993, pp. 18-41. http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs3604/lib/Therac_25/Therac_1.html Information for this article was largely obtained from primary sources

including official FDA documents and internal memos, lawsuit depositions, letters, and various other sources that are not publicly available.

Nancy Leveson Clark S. Turner

The authors:

Lots more stories Links will be added to references section of

web http://www5.in.tum.de/~huckle/bugse.html http://www.baddesigns.com/

Final Discussion Should Microsoft be held responsible for the

business problems and viruses caused by security holes in their software?