Post on 17-Jun-2015
Barbara Stripling & Paige Jaeger & You
The FBI will not come after you if you misuse, misquote, or copy information from the PPT,
However, this PPT was created using original material and PPT slides shared from colleagues who have given permission to share these with our educators.
Please do not copy or distribute.
(Suggestion from Copyright for Educators, Simpson p.84 1st Edition )
Grab one and wait for directions, please.
Teachers APPR
60% = Aligned to the NYS Teaching Standards:
1. Knowledge of Students & Student Learning 2. Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning 3. Instruction 4.Learning Environment 5.Assessment for Student Learning 6. Collaboration & Professional Responsibilities 7. Professional Growth
7
“twenty percent of the evaluation shall be based upon student growth data on state assessments … or
comparable measure of student growth if such growth data is not available.”
State Ed & RTTT:
Locally developed measures may include:
•
From Institutional to Individual Accountability
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11629603@N04/4023889447
/
Results in a single composite score of teacher or principal effectiveness
PJaeger - WSWHE School Library System
“Expedited 3020A proceedings”
It helps you with the regulations:
◦ Ed Law: 90.18 ◦ Ed Law 30.12c ◦ Expedited 3020A ?
Data = tool for your mission, goal, required, APPR, to assess
learning, and more
http://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/NDE2MjU2MTA1
To inform learning
monitor & adjust
Direct Data Measurable –
QuantitativeTesting In September Testing in June Direct numerical
values Measurable growth Testing upon entrance
to [6th] grade…testing upon exit from [8th] grade…etc.
Develop a September assessment?
Indirect data (not for grading, but direction)
Qualitative Ex. CirculationCorrelation between
circulation and test scores?
Number of classes co-taught
Skill reinforcement Item analysis, log
lessons taught, collaborate with teachers
http://www.corestandards.org/presentations
Rubrics are great to guide me, but I need additional formative assessments along the way which are
engaging.
The real message is…Formalize your informal assessment
◦ Pre-assess formally ◦ Pre-assess informally◦ Pre-assess innovatively Are you
doing this, and don’t realize it?
Judy Goralski LibrarianDorothy Nolan, SSCSD
Low tech No Tech Or online via:
◦ Mindmeister.com ◦ Popplet.com
Graffiti Placemats
Disguised label for “mind mapping”
Assessable Archive… Information known Misinformation ?Names & Dates
L. Alden, SGF Harrison Ave. Librarian
L. Alden, SGF Harrison Ave.
(3rd Grade)
Fort Ann CSDKarin Howansky
http://doodle.com/pgtzcp7ksfvcyh4e
Transcript of SlaveryQuestion518 « TodaysMeet.mht
Laurie Alden, SGF Harrison Avenue
1. Standard texting rates only (worst case US $0.20)2. We have no access to your phone number3. Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling do
TIPS
EXAMPLE
Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling doTIP
EXAMPLE
1. Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling do2. Since @poll is the first word, your followers will not receive this tweetTIPS
EXAMPLE
On-going, formative, assessments.
Rigor, relevance & rubrics
Turn your colored paper over, please Compare beginning to end.
http://www.stixy.com/guest/95134
47
Appropriate Training for All Evaluators
Teacher/Principal Improvement Plans (Developing/Ineffective)
Utilize Evaluation Results as a Factor in Career Ladder Decisions and Other Recognition
Locally-Developed Appeal Process
Expedited 3020a Process (Single Hearing Officer/After Two Consecutive Ineffective Ratings)
48
New performance evaluation system for teachers : 20% - State student growth data or comparable measure of
student growth 20% - Locally selected measures of student achievement
that are determined to be rigorous and comparable across classrooms in accordance with regulations of Commissioner
60% - Multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness based on standards prescribed in the Regulations of the Commissioner
Four rating categories: highly effective; effective; developing; ineffective
Results in a single composite score of teacher or principal effectiveness