Settling the Score: Street Performance Measures

Post on 05-Jul-2015

60 views 2 download

description

In an effort to better quantify the pedestrian and bicycle experience, this panel discusses multi-modal level of service and alternative methodologies for evaluating how well streets welcome walking and biking. The speakers will explore perspectives from practice and academia, as well as regional versus street segment approaches. Presenters: Presenter: Madeline Brozen UCLA Complete Streets Initiative Co-Presenter: David Anspacher Montgomery County Planning Department Co-Presenter: Jessica Horning Oregon DOT Co-Presenter: Mike Lowry Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho Co-Presenter: Conor Semler Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Transcript of Settling the Score: Street Performance Measures

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

NEXT GENERATION BICYCLE PLANNING

Montgomery County Planning Department

David Anspacher, Montgomery County Planning Department

Background

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Background

• Funding Source:

– Metropolitan Washington Council of Govts Transportation Land Use Connections Program

• Consultant Team

– Kittelson & Associates

– Toole Design Group

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA

FREDERICK COUNTY, MD

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA

HOWARD COUNTY, MD

WASHINGTON, DC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD

PRINCE GEORGE’S, MD

Population: 1 million Area: 507 sq miles

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA

FREDERICK COUNTY, MD

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA

HOWARD COUNTY, MD

WASHINGTON, DC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD

AGRICULTURAL RESERVE

PRINCE GEORGE’S, MD

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA

FREDERICK COUNTY, MD

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA

HOWARD COUNTY, MD

PRINCE GEORGE’S, MD

WASHINGTON, DC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD

AGRICULTURAL RESERVE

ROCKVILLE

WHEATON

SILVER SPRING

BETHESDA

FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

LOUDOUN COUNTY, VA

FREDERICK COUNTY, MD

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA

HOWARD COUNTY, MD

PRINCE GEORGE’S, MD

WASHINGTON, DC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD

AGRICULTURAL RESERVE

ROCKVILLE

WHEATON

SILVER SPRING

TWINBROOK

WHITE FLINT

BETHESDA

FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS

Purpose

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Traditional Suburban Bicycle Planning

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Four Types of Transportation Cyclists

Strong and Fearless (~4%)

Enthused and Confident (~9%)

Interested but Concerned (~56%)

No Way, No How (~31%)

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

TRADITIONAL

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

EMERGING

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

EMERGING

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

“If or when I ride a bike, I’m concerned about being hit by a motor vehicle”

Source: Jennifer Dill

39% 52% 84%

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

“Enthused and Confident”

• “Enthused and Confident” group is okay with bike lanes

Source: Jennifer Dill

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

“Interested but Concerned”

Source: Jennifer Dill

• “Interested by Concerned” group requires buffered bike lanes or cycle tracks on arterial roads

Bicycle Facility Selection Tools

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Traditional Facility Assessment

Maryland State Highway Administration

Posted Speed Limit

Truck Volumes %

Shoulder/ Lane Width

≤35 mph 4 feet

>35 mph and ≤45 mph

≤8% trucks 5 feet

>8% trucks

6 feet

>45 mph 6 feet

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Traditional Facility Assessment

• Each link is evaluated individually

– Network connectivity not considered and prioritized

– Intersections and transitions not considered

• Limited number of bicycle facilities

– New bicycle facilities and treatments have been developed for different contexts

• One size fits all approach

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Innovative Facility Selection Tools

• Account for the different needs of different types of users

• Recognize network connectivity

– Both in matters of facility siting and transitions at intersections or other obstacles

• Additional facility types are included in assessment

Tool #1: Nomographs

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Click to edit Master title style

Speed (mph)

Traf

fic

Vo

lum

e (

AD

T)

CONFIDENT CYCLISTS

50K

45K

40K

35K

30K

25K

20K

15K

10K

5K

<5K

<15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55+

Physically Separated

Physically Separated Or Bike Lane with Buffer

Wide Bike Lane (Buffer Optional)

Mixed Traffic or Sharrow

Speed (mph)

INTERESTED BUT CONCERNED

10K

9K

8K

7K

6K

5K

4K

3K

2K

1K

<1K <15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55+

Traf

fic

Vo

lum

e (

AD

T)

Physically Separated

Mixed Traffic or Sharrow

Wide Bike Lane

(buffer optional)

Wide Bike Lane

(buffer preferred)

or Bike Lane with Buffer

Physically Separated

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Spring Street (west of Georgia Ave), Silver Spring Speed: 30 mph Volume: 9,700

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Speed (mph)

Traf

fic

Vo

lum

e (A

DT)

CONFIDENT CYCLISTS 50K

45K

40K

35K

30K

25K

20K

15K

10K

5K

<5K

<15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55+

Speed (mph)

INTERESTED BUT CONCERNED 10K

9K

8K

7K

6K

5K

4K

3K

2K

1K

<1K <15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55+

Traf

fic

Vo

lum

e (

AD

T)

Physically Separated Physically Separated

Physically Separated Or Bike Lane with Buffer

Wide Bike Lane (Buffer Optional)

Mixed Traffic or Sharrow

Mixed Traffic or Sharrow

Spring Street (west of Georgia Ave), Silver Spring Speed: 30 mph Volume: 9,700

Tool #2: Level of Traffic Stress

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Level of Traffic Stress

• Four stress levels based on key facility and traffic factors

– Stress level 1 – Requires little attention, suitable for children

– Stress level 2 – Low traffic stress, but only suitable for most adults

– Stress level 3 – Moderate traffic stress for all bicyclists

– Stress level 4 – High stress, only suitable for experienced bicyclists

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Level of Traffic Stress

• Key factors include

– Presence and type of facility

– Width of dedicated bicycle facility

– Number of vehicle lanes

– Vehicle speed and volume

– Density of driveways, intersections, and other conflicts with facility

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Bethesda Downtown Plan

M

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Network for the “Strong and Fearless”

Existing Network Planned Network

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Network for the “Enthused and Confident”

Existing Network Planned Network

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Network for the “Interested but Concerned”

Existing Network Planned Network

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Benefits of Level of Traffic Stress Compared to Other Metrics

• Incorporates physically separated facilities (shared use paths, cycle tracks)

• Evaluates road segments and intersections based on perceived safety

• Data requirements permit a relatively quick network assessment

• Enables improvements to be prioritized to maximize connectivity for different user groups

• How well you are addressing target population

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CO

UN

TY

PLA

NN

ING

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

David Anspacher

Montgomery County Planning Department

(301) 495-2191

david.anspacher@montgomeryplanning.org

www.montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/bikeways/