presented by

Scrum and CMMI/MPS.BR ?

ScrumGathering Sao Paulo, May 2009

How to combine Scrum and CMMi to achieve the excellence in Software Development

Ana RouillerBoris Gloger

1st ScrumGathering Vienna2004

2007 1st Certified ScrumMaster Training in Sao Paulo

2009 1st Scrum Gathering in South America

Software Engineer PhD for small companies

2001

2006 Apparisser MPS.BR

2008 CMMI Apraisser

Apraisser and Consultant in more than 150 companies

Ana about Boris:

“Boris is a CMMi person doing Scrum!”

Boris about Ana:

“Ana is a Scrum person doing CMMi!”

Regions, where we started to combineCMMi/MPS.BR and Scrum

let´s start ...

Why do we believe that Scrum and CMMi will enable small companies in Brazil to grow?

TEAM

The Traditional Way to

Implement Scrum

PB

Sprint # 4

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 2

Sprin

tSp

rint

Retr

o-

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 1 .......

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

VISION

Product Idea

The Scrum Flow

Releaseplan

Product Backlog

Sprint # 1 Sprint # 2 Sprint # 3

PR O D U C T O W N E R

PB PBPB PB

9:00

12:00

18:00

Day 1

Do your Daily Scrum every day! Do your Daily Scrum every day! Do your Daily Scrum every day!Sp

rint P

lann

ing

2

Sprin

tRe

view

Sprin

tRe

tro-

spec

tive

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 1

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Release

Version 1.2

Releaseplan Update

version 0.0 version 1.0 version 1.2 version 2.0

C U S T O M E R C U S T O M E R

C U S T O M E R

M A N A G E R

M A N A G E R M A N A G E R

.......

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 2

Sprin

tRe

view

Sprin

tRe

tro-

spec

tive

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 1 .......

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 2

Sprin

tRe

view

Sprin

tRe

tro-

spec

tive

Sprin

t Pla

nnin

g 1 .......

T E A M

SC R U M M A S T E R

U S E R U S E R

WHAT to do - Sprint Planning 1

PB

Analyse

HOW to do - Sprint Planning 2 CHECK it - Daily Scrum

version 0.0 version 1.0 version 1.3 version 2.0

©2009

Understand

T E A M

85

138203

5

4013 3

0

8

100?20

5 2

1

PlanningPoker

SIZE it - Estimation Meeting

Play!

PB

prioritized

Tactical Level

Strategic Level

PB

Estim

atio

n M

eetin

g

Scrum is most only

used to run a project on

team or multi-team

level

MO TUMO WE TH FRTUMO TU WE TH FR

Training

PO-Roll

BacklogPrep

Estim.

Prio

SP 1

SP 2

PRODUCT OWNE

R

PRODUCT OWNE

R

SCRUM MASTER

TEAM

PRODUCT OWNE

R

TEAM

PRODUCT OWNE

R

SCRUM MASTER

TEAM

TEAM

SCRUM MASTER

Rev

Retro

BacklogPrep

Estim.

TEAM

PRODUCT OWNE

R

TEAMPRODUCT OWNE

R

company backlog and larger Scrum Set-UP

synchronization of teams

Sprint planning 1

Sprint planning 2

Product Owner Team

There is no clear understanding about

how to mature organizations

Problem of Scrum Implementation

The Traditional Way to Implement CMMi

!"#$%&$'()&(*+,-+.$/'01.$2&,3(4-+$%&$/&56-#-78#$

/9.$9&#&(:8;:-<&(78$%&$/&56-#-78#$=>.$>8;6?@8$

=A4(-4+$"B.$B(7&),+?@8$%&$",8%678$

C'/.$C&,-D4+?@8$C!E.$C+;-%+?@8$

!"#$%&$!F8-8.$G1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$G8(D)6,+?@8$""0!.$2+,+(H+$%+$06+;-%+%&$$$$$$$$$$$$$$%&$",84&##8$&$",8%678$

1!.$1&%-?@8$&$!(I;-#&$$9!/.$!(I;-#&$%&$9&4-#@8$$

&$/&#8;6?@8$G!/.$!(I;-#&$%&$G+6#+$&$

$$$$$$$$$/&#8;6?@8$

4: Gerenciado Quantitativamente$OPP, QPM

3: Definido$RD, TS, PI, VER, VAL, OT, OPF, OPD, IPM, RSKM, DAR

2: Gerenciado$REQM, PP, PMC, SAM, MA, PPQA,CM

1: Inicial$

5: Otimizando$OID, CAR

!"#$%&$2&,3(4-+$%&$",84&##8.$J"K.$K848$(8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J"9.$9&D(-?@8$%8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J=.$=,&-(+<&(78$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J"".$9&#&<F&(*8$%8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$JB9.$B(8:+?@8$&$1&;*8,-+$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$

!"#$%&$2&,3(4-+$%&$",8M&78.$"".$";+(&M+<&(78$%&$",8M&78$"1G.$!48<F+(*+<&(78$&$$$$$$$$$$G8(7,8;&$%&$",8M&78$>!1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$!48,%8#$$$$$$$$$$$48<$K8,(&4&%8,&#$B"1.$2&,3(4-+$B(7&),+%+$%&$",8M&78$/>N1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$/-#48$0"1.$2&,3(4-+$06+(H7+H:+$%&$",8M&78$$

5: Otimizando

4: Ger. Quant.

3: Definido

2: Gerenciado

1: Executado

0: Incompleto J"K$$J"9$$OOO$$""$$"1G$$OOO$$9!/$$G!/$

PQR$ST:&-#$%&$G+F+4-%+%&.$

PUR$ST:&-#$%&$1+76,-%+%&.$

/&F,&#&(7+?@8$

'#7+)-+%+$$$86$$$G8(V(6+$

$$$$$$$%&$$W,&+#$%&$",84&##8$

PXXR$W,&+#$%&$",84&##8$P!"#R.$

---

---

---

---

---

---

G11B$Y$>'Z>[$:\O\$

!"#$%&'(&)*#$*+,($*#-&

+-.&&/$0',.,#-.&

!"#$%&1-(2%-($3&

4($*#-&25%5&-.&&/$0',.,#-.

65#%,7&+$&/5.#%$5",8,+5+$&-'&9,.#$(5&+$&:;-(25*<5($*#-&+$&/$0',.,#-.&

/$0',.,#-.&

65*#$%&/5.#%$5($*#-&

=,+,%$;,-*58&&/$0',.,#-.&&

>+$*4?;5%&>*;-*.,.#@*;,5.&

$*#%$&&A%5"58<-&+-&B%-C$#-&$&/$0',.,#-.&

D$%$*;,5%

&6'+5*E5.

&/$0',.,#-.

Does not effect the people (teams) that

really do Software

Problem of CMMi Impl. Level 2

TEAM

Why not bringing both worlds together?

Scrum CMMi

2009

CMMi

Scrum

Start of two movements inside the company .... CMMi

Scrum

Start of two movements inside the company ....

... in the same time!

CMMi

Scrum

1. Run Scrum in Teams

2. Do CMMi in the Organization

Modelling the Business

Where do we go?

Start an SEPG

Measurement and Analysis System

Our Observations

5ª Sprint em andamento.

•! Melhoria das estimativas.

•! Melhoria da comunicação.

•! Time comprometido.

•! Disseminação do conhecimento.

•! Conhecimento antecipado dos riscos.

•! Melhoria na qualidade do produto

•! Melhoria da qualidade de vida dos desenvolvedores e

técnicos

Resultados

•! Visibilidade Pública.

•! Estimativas melhores.

•! Comunicação melhorada (Reuniões mais

frequentes, melhor Integração da Empresa).

•! Trabalho em Equipe.

•! Participação do Product Owner.

•! Organização das Idéias.

•! Estórias pequenas mas gerênciaveis (menos

incerteza e acompanhamento do PO)

•! Satisfação de concluir tarefas e estórias (estórias

com fim).

2

Resultados

•! Melhoramos o conhecimento sobre Scrum.

•! Muitas dúvidas já solucionadas.

•! Já achamos que sabemos como fazer melhor os

backlogs, estimativas, SP1, SP2, reviews e

demos.

•! Ainda não achamos o ponto de sintonia da Daily

Scrum.

•! Estimativas ainda são muito falhas.

•! XP goela abaixo: aumento de produtividade e

redução dos bugs.

Ínsula Tecnologia da Informação

Some Results from a workshop of companies in Maringa!

We observed ....

Rework that was 50% was down to 5%

0

12,5

25

37,5

50

2007

2008

2009

We observed ....

We became more mature quickly because the life cycle is

much shorter and all people have been involved.

We observed ....

control of urgency went to organizational level

We observed ....

We used the PDCA for all people in the organization

We observed ....

The improvements have been based on

objective data

We observed ....

In March 2010 we will publish the results about what will have happened in at least 30 companies

We observed ....

copyright by:Boris Gloger, Baden-Baden, GermanyAna Rouiller, SWQuality, Recife, Brazil

get in contact with us:AnaRouiller@gmail.com

Boris.Gloger@borisgloger.com