div class=trans-pagebuttonPage 1button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 1: · Roof strength comparison withwithout windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216 typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are src=https:reader033fdocumentsinreader033viewer20220423125edadec809ac2c67fa687101html5thumbnails1jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 2button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 2: · Roof strength comparison withwithout windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216 typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are src=https:reader033fdocumentsinreader033viewer20220423125edadec809ac2c67fa687101html5thumbnails2jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 3button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 3: · Roof strength comparison withwithout windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216 typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are src=https:reader033fdocumentsinreader033viewer20220423125edadec809ac2c67fa687101html5thumbnails3jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 4button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 4: · Roof strength comparison withwithout windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216 typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are src=https:reader033fdocumentsinreader033viewer20220423125edadec809ac2c67fa687101html5thumbnails4jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 5button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 5: · Roof strength comparison withwithout windscreens Figure 6 shows that when tested under FMVSS 216 typical maximum forces generated at conditions of 50 pitch and 250 roll are...