Post on 19-May-2015
description
Policy Learning andthe Role of Science and Technology
Policy ResearchPer M. Koch
Head of the Science Policy Project
2 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Personal Background
• Head of policy learning project in Ministry• Chair of the OECD STIG-project on STI for global
challenges• Policy director in Research Council of Norway• Researcher and Director in STEP / NIFU STEP
(innovation and innovation/research policy studies)• STP in the ministry in the 1990s• Member of various OECD working parties• Adviser in the EU Trend Chart on innovation• Analyst for EU ERAWATCH (science policy)• Social science in the EU Framework Programme• Academic background: The History of Ideas
3 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Focus of this presentation
• The research and innovation policy area (STP)
• Learning and innovation in the research and innovation policy system
• Democracy in the sense of transparency and stakeholder involvement
4 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Innovation in policy environments
• Research and innovation policy makers (civil servants and politicians) talk a lot about learning and innovation in industry and the public sector.
• They seldom look at themselves as participants in networks of learning or systems of innovation.
• Science and technology policy studies can help them gain insight into their own roles as policy entrepreneurs.
• But that requires close interaction between STS/STP/Innovation researchers and policy makers.
5 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Organizational charts don’t say anything about learning
6 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
There is no learning hierarchy
NGOs and stakeholders
Ministries
Parliament
Researchers Consultants
Agencies
Policy learning arena
MEDIA
THE PUBLIC
INDUSTRYCIVIL SOCIETYStudents
7 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Interaction with researchers, experts, policy makers, stakeholders, politicians, citizens.
In-house learning based policy innovation
Policy makers develop new policies, new policy measures and narratives
Ministries:Policy learning and innovation as co-evolution
Governance experience
Tacit knowledge
Acquired knowledge
Literature
Conferences and workshops
Mobility
Acquired R&D
International co-op.
“societal pull”
8 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Silos as barriers to policy learning
• The development of internal barriers and “silo mentalities”. Parallel systems maintain their own organisational norms, belief systems and practices.
• Distinct and well-established professional groupings, with their own communities of practice and rationales.
• Researchers grounded in narrow belief systems, interests and ideologies.
• Power struggles and turf wars stops flow of knowledge.
www.step.no/publin
9 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
This lack of reciprocal learning is a democratic problem
• Undermines communication and understanding – between policy
makers– Between policy
makers and researchers
– Between policy makers and society
• Lack of transparency
10 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Drivers for policy learning
• Staff with high levels of professional expertise, exhibiting a high level of creativity and problem solving and a positive attitude to teamwork– Mobility of people within the policy system, and
between policy and society– Researchers with an understanding for policy
learning and the political process– Employment of STS/STP/innovation savvy
candidates• NGOs and civil society• International learning arenas like the OECD and
the EU• Political push and crises
www.step.no/publin
11 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
The need for an understanding of the socio-cultural framework of policy making
• If researchers are to interact with policy institutions they must be aware of their belief systems and master narratives, regardless of policy area.
• Research and innovation policy makers and stakeholders have a special need for – research on the
interaction between S&T and society
– The social dynamics of S&T policy development
12 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
One example: Belief systems
• The policy makers
– The tribe (actor network)
– Their common belief system (ideology)
– Their master narratives
• The researchers
– The tribe (actor network)
– Their common belief system (paradigm)
– Their master narratives
13 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Different belief systems in research and innovation policy
• Different ministries, agencies and stakeholders speak different languages
• What is most important?– Basic science or
innovation?– Economic growth or
welfare?– Technology or culture?
14 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
There are many policy narratives
• Reflect different understanding of:– What society is and how it
works– How research interacts with
society– Common terms (e.g.
“innovation”, “research”)– What the role of science is– What the best theoretical
and methodological foundation for policy development is
15 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
The science narrative
• Social contract between science and the state
• Supporters in ministries of research, and in universities
• Narrative: Science produces ideas and inventions to be used in society
• Linear model
• Originally influenced by STP
16 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
The business narrative
• Social contract between the business sector and the state
• Supporters in industry and ministries of industry
• Narrative: Industry innovates, which leads to increased productivity and economic growth
• Originally a linear model, now systemic.
• Influenced by innovation research
17 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
In-house learning based innovation
Following the OECD systemic approach: Research is given a new and broader role as a learning tool
market pull
Through knowledge about customer and competitors the company does analysis of innovation
The company brings new or altered products, processes or services on to the market
Market competences
Tacit knowledge
Acquired technology
Literature
Conferences and fairs
Recruits
Acquired R&D
In-house R&D
18 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Shared properties of the science and business narratives
• Laissez faire and free competition– Researchers: Give us
money and we will give you results
– Industry: Do not pick winners! We know what the market needs!
• Fits well with neoclassical economy:– Research in a black box
outside the economy
19 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
The social narrative
• Social contract between the government and its citizens
• Supporters in the EU, the OECD and various national ministries
• Narrative: Research is part of the learning processes of society and institutions. The state must develop strategies for meeting major challenges.
• Case: OECD project for developing mechanisms for research cooperation for meeting global challenges
• Important role for STS
20 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Narrative confusion
• Policy makers may make use of terminology from another belief system to strengthen their own narrative:– “Basic research inevitably leads to
innovation”• Institutions may deliberately (?) mix narratives
– European Research Council and EU 3% objective: Linear
• The terms may be misunderstood– South Africa: National System of Innovation
often equals the institutional structure and not the system
21 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
STP and innovation researchers can
• Study and deconstruct belief systems and narratives
• Help policy makers understand their own socio-cultural landscape
• Help outsiders gain insight into the same landscape, making it easier for them to influence processes
• Makes close researcher/policy maker interaction a necessity
22 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
Traditional view of evidence based policy learning has to be abandoned
Independent researchers or experts
Civil servants
Politicians
The wall of disinterested objectivity
23 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
This must be an interactive learning arena
Independent researchers
(experts)
Civil servants(experts)
Politicians(experts)
Stake-holders
(experts)
They are all experts in their field, some in science, others in policy
24 Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
What about scientific independence and the critical view?• The larger the distance between
the policy maker and the researcher, the less likely the researcher is to understand governance, and the less relevant the research will be.
• Real independence is displayed through the ability to offer critical analysis and advice
• Researchers need alternative sources of funding
• The research should be exposed to both public and scientific debate