Research and development on satellite data assimilation at the Canadian Meteorological Center L....

Post on 04-Jan-2016

213 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Research and development on satellite data assimilation at the Canadian Meteorological Center L....

Research and development on satellite data assimilation at the Canadian

Meteorological Center

L. Garand, S. K. Dutta, S. Heilliette, M. Buehner, and S. MacPhersonWorld Weather Open Science Conference 2014Montreal, QcAugust 16-21, 2014

DRAFT – Page 2 – April 20, 2023

Outline

• Current data assimilation context

• Progress on the assimilation of surface sensitive infrared radiances over land

• Progress on the use of inter-channel error correlations

• Observing System Simulation Experiments capability

• Conclusion

DRAFT – Page 3 – April 20, 2023

New data assimilation context

EC moving to ensemble-variational (EnVar) system with:

•Flow-dependent background errors including surface skin temperature correlations with other variables

•Analysis grid at 50 km, increments interpolated to model 25 km grid, 80 levels

•~140 AIRS and IASI channels assimilated: many sensitive to low level T, q, and Ts.

•Assimilation of North America ground-based GPS (impacts humidity analysis)

DRAFT – Page 4 – April 20, 2023

Ensemble spread of Ts (Jan-Feb 2011) 00 UTC 06 UTC

12 UTC 18 UTC

Maximum ~15h localIn SH (summer)

Maximum at nightTibetan area (winter)

Ts background error over land in 4Dvar isConstant: 3 K.

In EnVar backgroundError is 50% ENKF,50% static (NMC)

DRAFT – Page 5 – April 20, 2023

Assimilation of surface-sensitive IR radiances over land

Key challenges:

•Reliable cloud mask •Spectral emissivity definition•Highly variable topography•Radiance bias correction•Background and observation error definition

DRAFT – Page 6 – April 20, 2023

Approach guided by prudence

Assimilate surface sensitive radiances under restrictive conditionsover land and sea ice:

•Estimate of cloud fraction < 0.01•High surface emissivity (> 0.97)•Relatively flat terrain (std of height < 100 m at 50 km scale)•Diff between background Ts and rough retrieval < 4 K

Radiance bias correction approach:

•For channels flagged as being surface sensitive, use only ocean data to update bias coefficients.

DRAFT – Page 7 – April 20, 2023

Limitation linked to topography

Criterion used: local STD of topography < 50 m (on 3X3 ~50 km areas)

RED: accepted, white std > 100 m, blue 100>std>50 m

DRAFT – Page 8 – April 20, 2023

Limitation linked to surface emissivity

Surface emissivityAIRS ch 787

Emissivity based onCERES land types(~15 km) + weighted averagefor water/ice/snowfraction.

Accept only emissivity > 0.97 ; Bare soil, open shrub regions excluded.

DRAFT – Page 9 – April 20, 2023

Assigned observation error to radiances

15.0m 4.13m 15.3m 4.50m

Assigned = f std(O-P) Desroziers = <(O-P)(O-A)>

f typically in range1.6-2.0

DRAFT – Page 10 – April 20, 2023

First attempt: negative impact in regions 60-90 N/S

00 hr 72hr

Possible cause: cloud contaminationRisk reduction: no assimilation at latitudes > 60 deg.

DRAFT – Page 11 – April 20, 2023

Second attempt with added constraints

• Exclude latitudes > 60 deg

• Limit gradient of topography to 50 m (previously 100m) Strong sensitivity of this parameter to std(O-B) of surface channels

DRAFT – Page 12 – April 20, 2023

Temp std difference vs lead time NH-Extra_trop

vs ERA Interim vs own analysis

Consistent positive impact vs ERA Interim and own

DRAFT – Page 13 – April 20, 2023

T std diff (CNTL-EXP) vs ERA-Interim

Tropics SH Extratropics

DRAFT – Page 14 – April 20, 2023

Time series of T std diff at 925 hPa

NH extratropics Tropics CNTLEXP

EXP superior to CNTL 55-65% of cases at days 3-5

DRAFT – Page 15 – April 20, 2023

850 hPa Temp anomaly corr.

NH extratropics TropicsCNTLEXP

DRAFT – Page 16 – April 20, 2023

120-h N-Extr vs ERA-Interim

CNTLEXP

DRAFT – Page 17 – April 20, 2023

Validation vs raobs 120-hFEB-Mar 2011 (59 days)

North America EuropeCNTLEXP

U V U V

GZ T GZ T

DRAFT – Page 18 – April 20, 2023

Added yield: about 15%(for surface sensitive channels)

Number of radiances assimilated for surface channel AIRS 787CNTL: ~1400/6h EXP: ~1600/6h

CNTLEXP

Region: world, EXP excludes surface-sensitive channels at latitudes > 60Radiance thinning is at 150 km

DRAFT – Page 19 – April 20, 2023

R&D on Inter-channel error correlations

• Approach based on Desroziers et al. 2005. It allows for a simple evaluation of the R matrix using assimilation by-products (O-A) and (O-B) for channels i,j :

R = <(O-A)i(O-P)j>

• Bormann et al. demonstrated that this method gives similar results as other methods

• No adjustable parameter

DRAFT – Page 20 – April 20, 2023

Known limitations

• The approach makes use of several assumptions (as other methods such as Hollingsworth-Longberg):

– Unbiased observations – Uncorrelated Background and Observation errors– Well specified B matrix

DRAFT – Page 21 – April 20, 2023

Implementing the approach

tsym RRR~~

2

1~

• Desroziers diagnostic was applied using 21 days of quality controlled and bias corrected radiances assimilated in a reference cycle.

• The resulting Desroziers matrix was symmetrized:

• Estimates done for all radiances: AIRS, IASI, AMSU-A, AMSU-B, and SSM/I.

• Variances on diagonal still inflated (1.6 std(O-P))2

• Added modest 3% to analysis time

• Did not affect convergence of analysis cost function, using standard pre-conditioning

DRAFT – Page 22 – April 20, 2023

Sample diagnosed correlations

Correlation structureof the symmetrized R for the 142 AIRS channels selected for assimilation

High correlations forwater vapor and surface channels

DRAFT – Page 23 – April 20, 2023

Forecast scores against ECMWF analyses(std difference CNTL – EXP)

24-h RELATIVE HUMIDITY

DRAFT – Page 24 – April 20, 2023

72-hr scores against ECMWF

T

U V

GZ

DRAFT – Page 25 – April 20, 2023

Temp. anomaly correlation against ECMWF analyses (500 hPa, world)

ControlExperiment

General conclusion:

Overall positive impact,Worth implementing

DRAFT – Page 26 – April 20, 2023

Planned Polar Communication and Weather Mission (PCW)

A possible 2-sat HEO system

Goal:Fill communication and meteorologicalobservation gaps in the Arctic. 15 min Imagery above 55N.

Most likely configuration:2 satellites in highly elliptical orbit

Status:Awaiting approval from governmentCould operate by 2021

Meteo instrument:Similar to ABI or FCI

DRAFT – Page 27 – April 20, 2023

PCW would fill AMV gaps at high latitudes: what impact to expect?

Example of current AMV coverage per 6-h from 10 sources

DRAFT – Page 28 – April 20, 2023

Impact on NWP based on OSSE(ECMWF Nature Run used as “truth”)

OSSE showing significant impact of PCW AMVs filling gap in polar areas

Garand et al., JAMC, 2013

Positive impact (blue) at 120-hIn both polar regions from 4 satellites

DRAFT – Page 29 – April 20, 2023

Conclusion

• R&D assimilation now benefiting from En-Var system.

• Encouraging results on assimilation of surface sensitive IR radiances over land. Next step is to relax limitation on surface emissivity.

• Overall positive impact considering inter-channel error correlation for all radiances. Plan is to implement along with Cris and ATMS in 2015.

• OSSE capability developed at EC, and used to support PCW