Regulatory Reform for LTCI Viability

Post on 24-Jun-2015

186 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Regulatory Reform for LTCI Viability

MANAGEMENT

REGULATORY REFORM FOR LTCI VIABILITY

Session 22: February 27, 2006

Session Producer:

Sharon Reed, Asst Vice President

Strategic Operations

Penn Treaty Network America

MANAGEMENT

Regulatory Reform for LTC Viability

John HartnedyFormer Arkansas Deputy Commissioner

Mark LitowMilliman

Cameron WaitePenn Treaty Network America

3

MANAGEMENT

Session Format

This interactive session will provide opportunity for questions and discussion

after introductory comments from the panelists.

4

MANAGEMENT

Introduction

• What’s Changing? Who’s Changing It?

• Actuarial Influence on Public Policy

• Updates beyond Washington

MANAGEMENT

John Hartnedy

Former Arkansas Deputy

Commissioner

6

MANAGEMENT

Overregulation

• Federal Government

• State Government

• Hinders product development

• Creates excessive work

• Limits rate competition

• Limits capital

7

MANAGEMENT

Disclosure

• IMSA- an example of an overall approach

• Industry association needs to police itself and publish results

• Industry is not creative enough!

8

MANAGEMENT

Reserves

• Formulaic covers about 80% of companies

• Fair market value and Enterprise Risk Management are coming…

• Independent actuaries need to certify results.

MANAGEMENT

Mark E. Litow, F.S.A.

MillimanConsultants and Actuaries

10

MANAGEMENT

Results of Current Reserving Requirements

• Strong tendency for increasing Statutory and GAAP margins due to Persistency/Morbidity/Interest Direction / recent RBC exception

• High Increase in artificial margins and back load income / Statutory and GAAP

• Results– Break even period increases– Cost of capital high (including risk based capital formula

mismatch)– High taxes– Companies’ financial situation harmed / premiums increase– Companies more reluctant to enter/stay in business

11

MANAGEMENT

LTC Statutory Contract Reserves

Mortality:– 1994 Group Annuitant Mortality Table (GAM)

for Policies Issued in 2005 and laterSample Cell (Age 65)

Scenario IRR Premium

Base: 1983 GAM 15.0% $2,910

1994 GAM 13.15% $2,910

1994 GAM 15.0% $3,000

12

MANAGEMENT

LTC Statutory Contract Reserves

LapsePrior to 2005 2005 and Later

For policy years 1-4, the lesser of 80% of the voluntary lapse rate used in the calculation of gross premiums and 8%

For policy year 1, the lesser of 80% of the voluntary lapse rate used in the calculation of gross premiums and 6%

For policy years 5+, the lesser of 100% of the voluntary lapse rate used in the calculation of gross premiums and 4%

For policy years 2-4, the lesser of 80% of the voluntary lapse rate used in the calculation of gross premiums and 4%

For policy years 5+, the lesser of 100% of the voluntary lapse rate used in the calculation of gross premiums and 2%, except for group insurance as defined in [Section 4E(1) of the NAIC LTC Insurance Model Act] where the 2% shall be 3%.

13

MANAGEMENT

LTC Statutory Contract Reserves

Lapse Sample Cell – Age 65

Priced for Lapse 9%, 7%, 5%, 3%, 2%, 1.5%

IRR Premium

Prior to 2005 15% $3,000

2005 and Later 15% $3,000

Sample Cell – Age 65

Priced for Lapse 9%, 7%, 5%, 3%, 3%

Prior to 2005 2005 and Later

IRR Premium

Prior to 2005 15.0% $2,640

2005 and Later 12.8% $2,640

2005 and Later 15.0% $2,750

14

MANAGEMENT

LTC Statutory Contract Reserves

Interest:– NAIC Model “… Maximum rate permitted by

law in valuation of whole life insurance …”– 4% in 2006

Sample Cell (Age 65)

Scenario IRR Premium

Base: 4.5% Valuation Rate 15.0% $3,000

4.0% Valuation Rate 13.3% $3,000

4.0% Valuation Rate 15.0% $3,100

15

MANAGEMENT

LTC Statutory Contract ReservesMethod:

– 1 Year Preliminary Term (since 1/1/92)

Morbidity:– “Valued using tables established for reserve purposes

by a qualified actuary and acceptable to the commissioner.”

– “In determining the morbidity assumptions, the actuary shall use assumptions that represent the best estimate of anticipated future experience, but shall not incorporate any expectation of future morbidity improvement.”

16

MANAGEMENT

LTC Risk Based Capital

Current: • 25% of first $50 million earned premium• 15% of earned premium in excess of $50 million• 5% of claim reserves

New:• 10% of first $50 million earned premium• + 3% of earned premiums in excess of $50 million• + 25% times first $35 million in incurred claims• + 8% times incurred claims in excess of $35 million• + 5% of unpaid claims reserves• + 10% non-can additional charge

17

MANAGEMENT

LTC Risk Based Capital

New Pricing (Sample Cell)

IRR Premium

Current RBC 15.0% $3,000

New RBC 18.5% $3,000

New RBC 15.0% $2,910

MANAGEMENT

Cameron Waite

Penn Treaty Network America

19

MANAGEMENT

Industry and Regulators

• Industry– Rate Increases– Expanded agent

commissions– Closed blocks– Company exits

from business line

• Regulators– Consumer protection– Monitoring reserves– Surplus adequacy– Future rate stability

20

MANAGEMENT

• Balancing Consumer Advocacy and Industry Viability

• Regulators role/ Industry role

• Legislation and Regulation at the state and federal level to gain ongoing viability

Moving Ahead…

21

MANAGEMENT

Interactive Discussion• Is regulation hurting the viability of the LTC

market? If so, what types of directional changes would you suggest?

• Should there be a morbidity standard for LTC?

• How do we develop a mechanism to evaluate current regulations/rules in today’s market?

22

MANAGEMENT

Interactive Discussion• What is the biggest threat to the LTC

private market?

• Do all regulations have to be applied consistently?

• What is the impact of changing the rules mid-stream?

• What is the impact from morbidity improvements?

23

MANAGEMENT

What Are Your Questions?