Post on 11-Jun-2018
Reference list 123
Reference list
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Akerson, V. L. (2003). Teaching elements of the nature of science: A year-long case
study of a fourth grader. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025-1049.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Akerson, V. L. (2007). On the role and use of “theory” in science education research: A
response to Johnson, Sutherland and Sowell. Science Education, 91(1), 187-194.
Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International
Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416.
Abimbola, I. O. (1988). The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science. Science
Education, 72(2), 175–184.
Abimbola, O., & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions and alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of
teachers as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58(1), 14-19.
Abimbola, O., & Yarroch, W. L. (1993). The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science:
A second look. In The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and
Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, 1-4 August 1993. Ithaca, New York: Misconceptions
Trust.www.mlrg.org/proc3pdfs/Abimbola_Terminology.pdf
Abrie, A. L. (2010). Student teachers attitudes towards and willingness to teach evolution in a changing South
African environment. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 102-107.
Aguillard, D. (1999). Evolution in Louisiana public schools: A decade following. The American Biology Teacher,
6(3), 182-188.
Alroy, J. (1999). The fossil record of North American mammals: evidence for a paleocene evolutionary radiation.
Systematic Biology, 48(1), 107–118.
Alshamrani, S. M. (2008). Context, accuracy, and level of inclusion of the nature of science concepts in current
high school physics textbooks. University of Arkansas: ProQuest Publishing Company.
Alters, B., & Alters, S. (2001). Defending evolution: a guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury: Jones
and Bartlett.
Al-Zahrani, A. (2008). Darwins metaphors revisited: conceptual metaphors, conceptual blends, and idealized
cognitive models in the theory of evolution. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(1), 50-82. DOI:
10.1080/10926480701723607
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2013). Atlas of Science Literacy, 1 & 2. Retrieved on the
15th
of September 2014 from http://www.project2061.org/publications/atlas/
American Association of Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Anfara, V. A., & Mertz, N. T. (2006). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Annetta, A., & Dotger, S. (2006). Aligning preservice teacher basic science knowledge with Interstate New
Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and National Science Teachers Association core content
standards. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 40-58.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge.
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Badenhorst, C. (2005). Research writing: Breaking the barriers. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers
Bailey, D. M. (1997). Research for the health professional: A practical guide. Philadelphia: Davis Publishing
Company.
Bak, N. (2004). Completing your thesis. A practical guide. Cape Town: Van Schaik Publishers.
Bak, P., & Sneppen, K. (1993). Panctuated Equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Physical
Review Letters, 71(24), 4080-4086.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is or might be the role of curriculum materials in
teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 68-74.
Reference list 124
Ball, L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers
and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423. DOI: 10.2307/1179386
Ball, D., & McDiarmid, G. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In M. H. Houston, & W. Sikula
(Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan.
Barrass, R. (1979). Vocabulary for introductory courses in biology: necessary, unnecessary and misleading terms.
Journal of Biological Education, 11(30), 179-191.
Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks.
Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201- 206.
Beardsley, P. (2004). Middle school students learning in evolution: are current standards available? The American
Biology Teacher, 66, 604-612.
Berger, M. (2006). The clash of cultures in the classroom and in the teaching of evolution. South African Journal
of Science, 102(3&4), 90.
Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge.
International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271-1279.
Bertram, C. (2009) Procedural and substantive knowledge: Some implications of an outcomes based history curriculum in South Africa. Southern African Review of Education, 15(1): 45 62.
Bettis, P.J., & Mills, M. (2006). Liminality and a changing academic landscape. In V. Anfara, & M. Metz (Eds.),
Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (pp. 59-71). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Publications.
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, W. (1986). Evolution by natural selection: A teaching module. The Institute of Research
in Teaching. Occasional paper, 91. Accessed on the 1st of November 2008 from
http://education.msu.edu/irt/PDFs/OccasionalPapers/op091.pdf
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Students conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution.
Educational Research and Improvement, 165, 1-22.
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (2006). Student conception of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
Bizzo, N. (1994). From down house landlord to Brazilian high school students. What has happened to
evolutionary knowledge along the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 537-536.
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Blank, R. (1996). How are state curriculum frameworks in science changing across the states? National
Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 80(577), 16–23.
Bodner, G., & Orgill, M. (2007). Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education. New York:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklin S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Borgatti, P. S. (1996). Elements of Research: Theoretical framework. Retrieved on the 9th of October 2015 from
http://www.analytictech.com/mb313/elements.htm.
Bowler, P. J. (1992). The eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900.
New Jersy: John Hopkins University Press.
Boyes, E., Chamber, W., & Stanisstreet, M. (1995). Trainee primary teachers ideas about the ozone layer.
Environmental Educational Research, 1(2), 133-145.
Buchmann, M. (1982).The flight away from content in teacher education and teaching. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 38(11), 1-17.
Braterman, P., & Holbrook, J. (2009). Putting Darwin in his place: The need to watch our language. The American
Biology Teacher, 71(2), 84-88.
Reference list 125
Brem, S., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive
negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87(2), 181-206, DOI:
101002/sec10105.
Brice, W. R. (1982). Bishop Ussher, John Lightfoot and the age of creation. Journal of Geological Education,
30(5), 18–24.
Brooks, D. (2011). The major metaphors of evolution: Visualising the extended synthesis. Evolution: Education
and Outreach, 4(3), 446-452.
Brumby, M. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science
Education, 68(4), 493-503.
Bruner, J. S. (1977). The process of education. London: Harvard University Press.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Burkhardt, R. (1995). The spirit of systems: Lamarck and evolutionary biology. Illinois: Harvard University Press.
Burns, R. B. (1997). Introduction to research methods. Australia: Longman.
Burnside, R. (2000). Towards best practice for design of electronic data capture instruments. Methodology
Advisory Committee paper, November 2000 meeting, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Canberra,
Australia.
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructivism. London: Routledge California: Sage.
Caliendo, S. M., & Kyle, W. C. (1996). Establishing the theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 33(3), 183-217.
Cambridge Dictionaries online (2015). Retrieved on the 10th
of September from
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/successfull.
Campbell, N., Reece, J., Urry, L., Cain, M., Wasserman, S., & Jackson, R. (2008). Biology. (8th
Edition). The New
York: Pearson Education
Cann, R.L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A. C. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature, 325, 32-36.
DOI: 10.1038/325031a0
Carlson J., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2013). The PCK summit consensus model and definition of pedagogical content
knowledge. The Symposium Reports from the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Summit, 2013.
Carroll, S., & Boyd, C. (1992). Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: Natural history with history. Evolution,
46(4), 1052-1069.
Carvalho, A. A., Lustigova, Z., & Lustig, F. (2009). Integrating new technologies into blended learning
environments. In E. Stacey, & P. Gerbic (Eds.), Effective blended learning practices: Evidence-based
perspectives in integrated computer technology-facilitated education (pp. 79-103). Chicago: Hershey,
Publishing Associates.
Carvalho, G. S. (2009). Addictive substances: textbook approaches from 16 countries. Journal of Biological
Education, 44(1), 26-30.
Catley, M., & Novick, R. (2008). An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. Biological Science,
58(10), 976-987.
Chabalengula, M., Mumba, F., Lorsbach, T., & Moore, C. (2008). Curriculum and instructional validity of the
scientific literacy themes covered in Zambian high school biology curriculum. International Journal of
Environmental and Science Education, 3(4), 207-220.
Chen, L., DeVries, A., & Cheng, C. (1997). Evolution of antifreeze glycoprotein gene from a trypsinogen gene in
antarctic notothenioid fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 94(8), 3811–3816.
Chenail, R. J. (2011). Ten steps for conceptualizing and conducting qualitative research studies in a pragmatically
curious manner. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1713-1730.
Chicago Style Citation (2015). Charles Darwin. BrainyQuote.com, Retrieved on the 5 of January 2015. From:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/c/charlesdar108972.html.
Reference list 126
Chisholm, L. (2002). Religion, science and evolution in South Africa: The politics and construction of the Revised
National Curriculum Statement for Schools (R-9). In W. James, & L. Wilson (Eds.), The architect and the
scaffold: evolution and education in South Africa (pp 51-59). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research
Council Press.
Chisholm, L. (2005). The making of South Africas national curriculum statement. Journal of Curriculum Studies,
37(2), 193-208.
Cho, H., Kahle, J., & Nordland, F. (1985). An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of
misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions in teaching genetics. Science
Education, 69(5), 707-771.
Cody, R., & Lee, C. (1990). Behaviours, beliefs and intentions in skin cancer prevention. Journal of Behavioural
Medicine, 13(4), 373-389.
Collins English dictionary (2015). Retrieved on the 6th
of October 2015 from:
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/pressure
Cook, D., & Ralston, J. (2003). Sharpening the focus: methodological issues in analysing online conferences.
Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(3), 361–376. DOI: 10.1080/14759390300200164
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton
Mifflin: Boston.
Cooper, B. (1997). On explaining change in school subjects. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(3), 207-
222.
Costa, J. T. (2003). Teaching Darwin with Darwin. Bioscience, 53 (11), 1030-1031.
Cotner, S. H., Brooks, C., & Moore, R. (2014). Science and society: Evolution and student voting patterns.
National Centre for Science Education, 34(6), 1-11.
Cameron, L. (2002). Metaphors in educational discourse. London: MPG Books Limited
Cracraft, J., &. Bybee, R. (2005). Evolutionary science and society: saving lives and promoting prosperity.
Proceedings of the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, American Institute of Biological Sciences
Symposium. November 2004. National Association for Biology Teachers Convention, Chicago. pp. 1-
202.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative
research. New York: Pearson Education.
Creswell, J., & Dana, L. (2010). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Crews, D., & Gore, A. C. (2012). Epigenetic synthesis: a need for a new paradigm for evolution in a contaminated
world. 1000 Biology Reports, 4(18), 1-6.
Dahleen, L., Okubara, P., & Blechl, A. (2001). Transgenic approaches to combat fusarium head blight in wheat
and barley. Crop Science, 41(3), 628-637.
Dalrymple, G. (1991). So how old is the Earth anyway? Natural Centre for Science Education Reports, 11(4), 11.
de Vaus, D. A. (2005). Research design in social research. London: Sage Publications.
De Vos, A. S. (1998). Conceptualisation and operalisation. In De Vos, A. S. (Ed.), Research at grassroots. A
primer for the caring professions. Pretoria: Van. Schaik Publishers.
De Wever, T., Schellens, M., Valcke, H., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyse transcripts
of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46(1), 6–28.
Deadline over National Council of Educational Research and Training rectifies 8 errors in biology textbooks for
classes XI, XII (2014). Indian Express. Retrieved on the 20th
of June 2015 from
http://0search.proquest.com.innopac.wits.ac.za/docview/1546419731?
Reference list 127
Deadman, J., & Kelly, P. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and hereditary
before they are taught the topic? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7-15.
DOI:10.1080/00219266.1978.9654169
Decker, T., Summers, G., & Barrow, L. (2007). The treatment of geological time and the history of life on Earth in
high school biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), 401-405
Delgato, M. (2009). Considerations of multicultural science and curriculum reform: A content analysis of state-
adopted biology textbooks in Florida. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertations and Theses. Florida: The
ProQuest, Graduate Thesis Publications.
Demastes, S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution:
cases of replication and comparison. Science Education, 79(6), 637-666. DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730790605
Dempster, E.R., & Hugo, W. (2006). Introducing the concept of evolution into South African schools. South
African Journal of Science, 102(3 & 4), 106-112.
Deniz, H., & Donelly, L. (2008). Exploring factors related to the acceptance of evolutionary theory amongst
Turkish pre-service biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biology
evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420-443.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Publications.
Department of Basic education (1997). Policy Document. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education (2002). Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R-9. Pretoria: Department
of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education (2005). National curriculum statement Grades 10-12 (general). Learning
Programme Guidelines for Life Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education (2007). Content Framework for Life Sciences Grades 10 to 12. Pretoria:
Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic education (2008). National Curriculum Statement Grades 10-12 (General) Learning
Programme Guidelines Life Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education (2010). Curriculum News: Improving the quality of learning and teaching.
Strengthening curriculum implementation from 2010 and beyond. Pretoria: Department of Basic
Education.
Department of Basic Education National Textbook catalogue (n.d) [a]. Retrieved on the 16 of April 2014 from
http://www.thutong.doe.gov.za/
Department of Basic Education (n.d) [b]. Evaluation form for Grade 12 learning and teaching support materials.
(Supplied by one of the publishers whose books were rejected).
Department of Basic Education (2010). Curriculum News: Improving the quality of learning and teaching.
Strengthening curriculum implementation from 2010 and beyond. Pretoria: Department of Basic
Education.
Department of Education (2011). Curriculum and Assessment policy Statement Grades 10 to 12 Life Sciences.
Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Devetak, I., & Vogrine, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. S. Kine
(Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks. Perth, Australia: Springer science.
Diamond, J., & Evans. E. M. (2007). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61(6): 1500–1506.
DiGiuseppe, M. (2013). Representing the nature of science in a science textbook: Exploring author–editor–
publisher interactions. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1061-1082.
Dingwall, R. (2008). The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research.
Twenty-First Century Society, 3(1), 1–12.
diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology
Teacher, 35(3), 125-9.
Reference list 128
Douglas, G., & Altman, D. (2002). Poor quality medical research. What can journals do? American Medical
Association, 287(21), 2765-2767.
Dreyer, J., & Loubser, C. (2005). Curriculum development, teaching and learning for the environment. In C.
Loubser (Ed.), Environmental Education: Some South African Perspectives. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Eaton, F., Anderson, W., & Smith, L. (1984). Students misconceptions interfere with science learning: Case
studies of fifth-grade students. The Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 365-379.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-
115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
Emereole, H. (2007). Comprehensive evaluation of science textbooks: An 8-point model. Proceedings of the 15th
Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science, and
Technology Education. 09-12 January 2007. Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique. pp.
355-370.
Engel-Clough, E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How secondary students interpret instances of biological
adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19(2), 125-130.
Evans, M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., Frazier, B., & Diamond, J. (2006). A conceptual guide to museum visitors
understanding of evolution. In Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association: San
Francisco.
Ewald, P. W. (1994). Evolution of infectious diseases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fahy, P., Crawford, G., & Ally, M. (2001). Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-24.
Faith, D. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61, 1–10.
Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: step by step. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Findley, A.M., Lindsey, S.J., & Watts, S. (2001). The impact of religious belief on learning in the science
classroom. Retrieved on the 12 of June, 2015 from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED460017
Flammer, L. (2006). The evolution solution: Teaching evolution without conflict. The American Biology Teacher:
Online publication, 1-17. Retrieved on the 17th
of June from http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/evo.sol.pdf
Fleminger, D. (2008). The Cradle of Humankind. South Africa: 30° South Publishers.
Fossils-facts and finds.com (2013). Retrieved on the 14th
of April 2014 from http://www.fossils-facts-and-
finds.com/
Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York; McGraw
Hill.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York:
McGraw Hill.
Freeman, S., &. Herron, J. C. (2007). Evolutionary analysis. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Freyberg, P., & Osborne, R. (1985). Assumptions about teaching and learning. In R. Osborne, & P. Freyberg
(Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of childrens science (pp. 82-90). Auckland: Heinemann.
Futuyma, D. J. (2009). Evolution. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Publishers
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, New York:
Longman.
Gallaudet University (2014), Assessment of student learning. Retrieved on the 21th of November 2014 from:
https://www.gallaudet.edu/office-of-academic-quality/assessment-office/assessment-of-student-learning-
outcomes/the-hows-and-examples/findings-summarize-data.html
Garritz, A. (2013). Pedagogical Content Knowledge for dummies. Educación Química, 24(2), 462-465.
Geraedts, C., & Boersma, K. (2006). Reinventing natural selection. Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 843-870.
DOI: 0.1080/09500690500404722.
Reference list 129
Gevers, W. (2002). The architect and the scaffold: evolution and education in South Africa. In W, James, & L.
Wilson (Eds.), Comment and response to science, evolution and schooling in South Africa. Cape Town:
Human Sciences Research Council Press and New Africa Education.
Gibson, J. (1996). Textbook misconceptions: The climax concept of succession. The American Biology Teacher,
58(3), 135-140.
Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodlad, J. I., Klein, M. F., & Tye, K. (1979). The Domains of Curriculum and their study. In J. I. Goodlad and
Associates (Eds.), Curriculum inquiry: The Study of Curriculum practice (pp. 43-76). New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Gottschalk, L. A. (1995). Content analysis of verbal behaviour: New findings and clinical applications. Hillside:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gould, C. D. (2010). The readability of school biology textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 11(4), 248-252.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions.
Evolution Education Outreach, 2(2), 156-175. DOI 10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher
College Press.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development
of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer
conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. DOI: 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-
C7Q3-NRAG
Hallden, O. (1988). The evolution of species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of
Science Education, 10(5), 541-542. DOI: 10.1080/0950069880100507.
Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.O. (2007). Describing and analysing learning in action: An empirical study of the
importance of science in learning. Science Education, 9(1), 142-164.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: Sunny Press.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through
computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). London: Springer-Verlag.
Hill, A., & Spittlehouse, C. (2009). Critical appraisal of research evidence. Oxford: Hayward Medical
Communications. Retrieved on the 20th of November 2015 from:
http://ophla.ca/pdf/CriticalAppraisalResearchEvidenceApril2014.pdf
Hodgson, J. (2000). GMO roundup, nature. Biotechnology, 18(January 2000), 7. DOI: 10.1038/71976.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental
and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.
Holtman, L. (2008). The teaching of evolution in South African schools: challenges and opportunities. Biology
International, 47(January 2010), 102-108.
Human Sciences Research Council (2002). The Architect and the scaffold: evolution and education in South
Africa. South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council Publishers.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. English Language Teaching, 48(4), 319-
325.
James, W., & Craig, E. (2000). The Creation Controversy and the Science Classroom. Arlington: National Science
and Technology Association Press. Retrieved on the 20th
of April from
http://wits.worldcat.org/title/creation-controversy-the-science-classroom/oclc/319492732
Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. Petersen, J., & Pinch, T. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage
Publications: Thousand Oaks, California.
Jeffrey, C. (2003). Artificial selection: A powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology, 84(7), 1650-1660.
Jensen, J. (1990). Changing curriculum: studies on outcomes-based education in South Africa. Kenwyn: Juta and
Company Limited.
Reference list 130
Jensen, J. (1999). The school curriculum since apartheid: intersections of politics and policy in the South African
transition. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 57-67. DOI: 10.1080/002202799183296
Jensen, J. (2001). Image in teachers: Policy images and teacher identity in the South African class room. South
African Journal of Education, 21(4), 242-246.
Jensen, M., & Finley, F. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy.
Science Education, 79(2), 147-166. DOI: 10.1002/ (sci) 1098-2736(199610)33:8.
Jimènez‐Aleixandrè, P. M. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A Look at textbooks and teachers.
Journal of Research in Science Teachng, 31(5), 519-535. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660310507
Jimènez-Alexandrè, M. P., & Fermandez-Perez, J. (1987). Selection or adjustment? Explanations of university
biology students for natural selection problems. In Novak, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the second
international seminar on Misconceptions and Educational strategies in science and mathematics, (pp.
224-232). Ithaca: Department of Education, Cornell University.
Jing-Jing, H. (2014). A critical review of pedagogical content knowledge components: nature, principle and trend.
International Journal of Education and Research, 2(4), 411-424.
Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.
Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Retrieved on the 8th
of December from: http://www.jstor.
org/stable/3700093.
Johnson, C. (2005). Animals in translation. New York: Scribner.
Johnson, J. G. (1982). Occurrence of phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibria through geologic time.
Journal of Paleontology, 56(6), 1329-1331.
Johnson, K., Dempster, E., & Hugo, W. (2011). Exploring the recontextualisation of biology in the South African
Life Sciences curriculum, 1996–2009. Journal of Education, 52, 27-58.
Johnson, K., Dempster, E., & Hugo, W. (2015). Exploring the recontextualisation of biology in the CAPS for Life
Sciences. Journal of Education, 60, 101-121.
Jungwirth, E. (1975). The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology teacher education. Journal of
Biological Education, 9(6), 243-246. DOI:10.1080/00219266.1975.965403
Jungwirth, E. (1977). Should natural phenomenon be described teleologically or anthropomorphically? – A
science educators view. Journal of Biological Education, 11(3), 191-196.
Kagan, T. (2011). Learners ideas about evolution, and the factors affecting the conception of such ideas in a
religious Jewish school. Research report submitted for the Faculty of Science, University of the
Witwatersrand in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of BSc (Honours).
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2005). Students: Intuitive explanation of the causes of homologies and
adaptations. Science Education, 17(1), 27-47. DOI: 10.1007/still91-007-9075-9.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students preconceptions of evolution: how accurate is the characterisation
as Lamarckian when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science Education, 16(3), 393-422.
Kang, N., Kara, A., Laskey, H. A., & Seaton, F. B. (1993). A SAS Macro for calculating inter-coder agreement in
content analysis. Journal of Advertising, 22(2), 17-28.
Keane, M., & Malcolm, C. (2003). Relevant science: but relevant to what? Laboratory Talk, 47(2), 36-38.
King, H. (2010). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales.
International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565–601.
Köse, Ö. E. (2010). Biology students and teachers religious beliefs and attitudes towards theory of evolution.
Hacettepe Üniversity Journal of Education, 38(168), 189-200.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publishers.
Latham, L.G., & Scully, E. P. (2008). Critters! A realistic simulation for teaching evolutionary biology. The
American Biology Teacher, 70(1), 30-33.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Reference list 131
Lawrence, S., & Sanders, M. (2011). A cross-sectional study of Life Sciences students misconceptions about
evolution, across three grades. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the South African
Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.16-19 January 2012.
Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lawson, A., & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of non-scientific beliefs about life: Effects of instruction and
reasoning skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(6), 589-606.
Le Compte, M., & Preissle, J. (1993). Enthography and qualitative design in educational research. London:
Academica
Leatherdale, W. H. (1974). The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science. California: American Elsevier
Publishing Company
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students and teachers conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, R. P. (1991). Content analysis: reliability and validity. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing,
16(4), 199.
Leeds, J. (1992). The course syllabus as seen by the undergraduate student. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Leedy, P. (1985). Practical research: Planning and design. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Leedy, P. (1989). Practical research planning and design. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Le Grange, L. (2007). Integrating western and indigenous knowledge systems: The basis for effective science
education in South Africa? International Review of Education, 53(5-6), 577-591.
Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovation in Education and Teaching
International, 44(1), 93-105.
Letsoalo, M. B. (1996). Improving text for English second language biology pupils. Journal of Biological
Education, 30(3), 184-188.
Lever, J. (2002). Science, evolution and schooling in South Africa. In W. James, & Wilson, L. (Eds.), The architect
and the scaffold: Evolution and education in South Africa. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research
Council Press.
Lewin, M. K. (2000). Mapping science education policy in developing countries. Washington, DC: The world Bank.
Linhart, Y. B. (1997). The teaching of evolution: We need to do better. Biological Science, 47(6), 385-391.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (1998). Research: Methods, critical appraisal and utilisation. St Louis: Mosby.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: assessment
and reporting of inter-coder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
Longbottom, J., & Butler, P. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science
Education, 83(4), 473-492. DOI: 10.1002/ (SICI) 1098-237X (199907)83:4<473: AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-Z
Losos, B. J. (2013). Evolutionary biology for the 21st century. Pressure Biological Science, 11(1) , 1371-1375.
Losos, J. B., Arnold, S. J., Bejerano, G., Brodie, E.D., & Soltis, S. (2013). Evolutionary biology for the 21st
century. Public Library of Science, 11(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001466
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2006). Developing science teachers pedagogical content knowledge. The
Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher
education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301-1320.
MacDowell, K., & Nappo, C. (2012). Evolution in childrens science books: recommendations and library
collections, 1863-1956. Baltmore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content
knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome (Ed.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers.
Reference list 132
Mahomed, H. (2004). Challenges in curriculum transformation in South Africa. Fifth Annual Educationally
Speaking Conference 15th – 18
th May, Birchwood Hotel, Boksburg. Gauteng.
Makotsa, D. (2012). Curriculum support materials as a possible source of erroneous ideas about evolution in
South Africa: Natural Sciences Grades 7, 8 and 9. Unpublished BSc Honours research report. University
of the Witwatersrand. South Africa.
Malatesta, A. (1950). Dry as chalk. The American Biology Teacher, 12(2), 27-28. DOI: 10.2307/4438125
Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal
of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
Martin, W. (2010). The prism and the rainbow: A Christian explains why evolution is not a threat. Baltimore: The
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Matejka, K., & Kurke, L. (1994). Designing a great syllabus. College Teaching 4(3): 115–17.
Matsumura, A. (2007). Evolutionary biology and anthropology education in high school textbooks. Anthropological
Science, 115(1), 53-56.
Matthews, M. R. (1998). The nature of science and science teaching. In B. J. Fraser, & K.G. Tobin (Eds.),
International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 981-999). Dordrecht: Kluwer
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. New Delhi: Thousand Oaks.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mayer, W. V., & Roth, A. A. (1978). Should creation be taught in public schools? Liberty, 73(5), 1-34.
Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence based inquiry. Boston: Pearson.
Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. The
American Biology Teacher, 62(2), 102-107.
Medical molecular farming: production of antibodies, biopharmaceuticals and edible vaccines in plants (2001).
Trends in Plant Science, 6(5), 219-226.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Integrating diversity with
quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
Merzyin, G. (1997). Language of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 483-498.
Meyer, L. A., Crummey, L., & Greer, E. A. (1988). Elementary science textbooks, their content, text characteristics
and comprehensibility. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(6), 577-588.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Miller, M. (2007). Pedagogical content knowledge. In G. Bodner, & M. Orgil. (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for
research in chemistry/science (pp. 86-105). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice hall.
Moellenbeck, D.J., Peters, M. L. Bing, J. W. Higgins, L.S., & Sims, L. (2001). Insecticidal proteins from Bacillus
thuringiensis protect corn from corn rootworms. Nature Biotechnology, 18(7), 668-672.
Molefe, L. (2013).The pedagogical content knowledge of South African Life Scinces teachers teaching evolution
for the first time. Unpublished MSc research report. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Moore, R., Decker, M., & Cotner, S. (2010). No prospect of an end: Chronology of the evolution-creation
controversy. Oxford: Greenwood Press.
Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., M., Day, J., & Jacobs, D. (2007). Undergraduate understanding of evolution:
Ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biology Education, 36(2), 65-71.
DOI:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655803
Mouton, J. (1996). Understanding social research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Mpeta, M., de Villiers, J. J. R., & Fraser, W. J. (2014). Secondary school learners response to the teaching of
evolution in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Biological Education, 247, 1-15. Retrieved on the
16th
of September 2014 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.914555
Reference list 133
Narendra, D., & Veena, M. (n.d). Textbooks: A source of students misconceptions at the secondary school level.
Proceedings of EPISTEME 4, India, pp. 122-126. Retrieved on the 20th
of July 2014 from
http://episteme4.hbcse.tifr.res.in/proceedings/strand-ii-cognitive-and-affective-studies-of-
stme/deshmukh-deshmukh.
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 education. Washington: The National Academic press.
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an
open response instrument: An oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131-
1160.
Nehm, R., & Reilly, R. (2007). Biology majors knowledge of misconceptions of natural selection. Biological
Sciences, 57(3), 263-272. DOI: 10.1641/B570311.
Nehm, R., & Schonfeld, I. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of
science lead to greater preference for teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teaching
Education, 18(5), 699-723. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-007-90627.
Nehm, R., Poole, T., Lyford, M., Hoskins, S., Carruth, L., & Colberg, P. (2009). Does the segregation of evolution
in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students mental models? Evolution Education
Outreach, 2(3), 527-532. DOI 10.1007/s12052-008-0100-5
Nehm, R., Rector, M., & Ha, M. (2010). Force-talk in evolutionary explanation: metaphors and misconceptions.
Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(4), 605-613.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W. (1997). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Florida: Sage Publications
Nieminen, P., & Mustonen, A. (2014). Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary
theory. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(11), 1-14. DOI: 10.1186/s12052-014-0011-6
Ngxola, N., & Sanders, M. (2009). Teachers’ content knowledge for teaching evolution for the first time:
perceptions and reality. Vol. 2 of the Pceeding of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Southern
African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology education. 19-22 January,
Rhodes University, Grahamstown. p. 417-426.
Ngxola, N. (2012). Teaching evolution in a new curriculum: Life Sciences teachers concerns and needs. A
research report, University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg.
Norman, K. D., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Ohkawa, H., Tsujii, H., & Ohkawa, Y. (1999). The use of cytochrome P450 genes to introduce herbicide tolerance
in crops: a review. Pesticide Science, 55(9), 867-874. DOI: 10.1002/ (SICI) 1096-9063(199909)55:9
Olakanmi, I., & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions and alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of
teachers as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58(1), 14-19.
Olander, C. (2006). Biology in context. London: Institute of Education
OLeary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: Sage Publications.
Opie, C. (2010). Doing educational research. London: Sage Publications
Ottevanger, W. (2001). Teacher support materials as a catalyst for science curriculum implementation in Namibia.
Doctoral dissertation. Enschebe: University of Twente.
Oxford Dictionaries (2014). Oxford University Press. Retrieved on the 2rd of August 2014 from
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/eclectic
Padian, K. (2013). Correcting some common misrepresentations of evolution in textbooks and the media.
Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(11), 1-13. DOI:10.1186/1936-6434-6-11
Parkes, J., & Harris, M. B. (2002). The purpose of a syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55–61.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Publications.
Reference list 134
Paul, D. (1988). The Selection of the survival of the fittest. Journal of the History of Biology, 21(3), 411-424.
Pawson, R. D. (1995). Methods of content/document/media analysis. In M. Haralambos (Ed.), Developments in
sociology (pp. 107-128). Ormskirk: Causeway Press.
Pederson, S., & Hallden, O. (1992). Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students developing
understanding of biology: the case of evolution. European Journal of Psychology Education, 9(2), 127-
137.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
Pierce, R. (2007). Evaluating information: validity, reliability, accuracy, triangulation. Research Methods in Politics,
5052, 79-99. Retrieved on the 21st of July from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/17810_5052_Pierce
Pinar, W. F. (1978). The reconceptualization of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 205–214.
Polit, D., & Hungler, B. (1999). Nursing research: principles and methods. Philaselphia: Lippncott.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception:
Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Pramling, N. (2008). The role of metaphor in Darwin and the implications for teaching evolution. Science
Education, 93(3), 535-547.
Prinou, L., Halkia, L., & Skordoulis, C. (2008). What conceptions do Greek school students form about biological
evolution? Evolution Education Outreach, 1(3), 321-317. Doi 10.1007/s/12052-0080051x.
Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P., & Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research methodology. Retrieved on the 28th
of
November 2015 from http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0601009.pdf
Rajput, J. S. (2002). Dimensions of curriculum change. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and
Training.
Reddy, L., & Sanders, M. (2014). The potential influence of Life Sciences examinations on misconceptions about
evolution. Proceedings of the 22nd
Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research
in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. 13-16 January 2014. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan
University, Port Elizabeth. pp. 146-154.
Rees, P. (2007). The evolution of textbook misconceptions about Darwin. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2),
53-55.
Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs: Educational.
Reimer, M., & Camp, F. (2006). Metaphor. In E. Lapore, & B. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 845-863.
Reiss, M. (1999). Teaching secondary biology. London: John Murray Publishers Limited.
Rice, J. W. (2010). The theory of evolution is not an explanation for the origin of life. Evolution Outreach, 3(2),141-
142.
Richards, J, & Mahoney, D. (1996). Teachers and Textbooks: a Survey of beliefs and practices: Perspective. City
University of Hong Kong: Department of English.
Rockefeller Foundation (1999). Rockefeller to end network after 15 years of success. Rockefeller Foundation,
286(5444), 1468-1469.
Rofo, R., Capocasa, M., Marcari, V., Darcongelo, E., Enrica, M., & Danubo, E. (2013). Knowledge of evolution
and human diversity: a study among high school students of Rome, Italy. Evolution: Education and
Outreach, 6(19), 1-10.
Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to
science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science, 25(10), 1171-1204. DOI:
10.1080/09500690210145819
Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2008). Precise of semantic cognition, a parallel distributed processing
approach. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31(6), 689–749.
Rosenthal, D. B. (1985). Evolution in high school biology textbooks. Science Education, 69(5), 637-648.
Reference list 135
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-
based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of
computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 8–22.
Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 30(8), 919-934.
Sanders, M. (2008). Teaching about evolution: More than just the content. Proceedings of the 4th
Biennial
Conference of the South African Association of Science and Technology Educators. University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 1-4 July 2008.
Sanders, M. (2010). Teaching evolution in a multi-cultural society: Teachers concerns and management
strategies for coping with conflict. Proceedings of the 14th
International Organization for Science and
Technology Education symposium. Socio-cultural and Human Values in Science and Technology
Education, 13-18 June 2010, Bled, Slovenia.
Sanders, M. (2014a). Teleological and anthropomorphic thinking and misconceptions about biological adaptations
in Natural Sciences textbooks. Proceedings of the 22nd
Annual Conference of the Southern African
Association for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. 13-16 January 2014.
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth. pp. 139-145.
Sanders, M. (2014b). Linguistic threats associated with metaphors about evolution. Curriculum Matters,
10(2014), 155-176.
Sanders, M., & Makotsa, D. (2016). The possible influence of curriculum statements and textbooks on
misconceptions: The case of evolution. Education as Change, 20(1), 1-23. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2015/555
Sanders, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). Teaching evolution in a learner-centred curriculum in times of demographic
change. Paper presented at the Learning in a Changing World conference, 21-22 November 2014.
Institute of Education, University of London.
Sanders, M., Tshuma, T., & Makotsa, D. (2012). Textbooks as a potential influence on misconceptions about
evolution. A workshop for publishers, textbook authors and researchers dealing with the topic of
evolution. 29 September 2012. Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences. University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Sanders, M., & Tshuma, T. (2013). Life Sciences textbooks as a potential factor influencing erroneous ideas
about evolution. 21st Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in
Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. 14-17 January 2013. University of the Western Cape,
Cape Town.
Sanders, M., Tshuma, T., & Makotsa, D. (2013). Recognising and dealing with common misconceptions about
evolution. Workshops run at the South African Association of Science and Technology Educators
(SAASTE). North West Provincial Conference 3rd Biennial General Meeting. 19 October 2013.
Wolmaransstad, North West Province. (Workshop targeting teachers and subject advisors
Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (2006). Data collection and analysis. London: Sage Publications in association with the
Open University.
Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 3I(5), 449-457.
Shen, B. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S.B. Day (Ed.), Communication of
scientific information (pp. 44-52). Basel: Karger. Pearson
Schussler, E., Link-Pérez, A., Weber M., & Dollo, H. (2010). Exploring plant and animal content in elementary
science textbooks. Journal of Biological education, 44(3), 123-128.
Schwab, J. J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., & Bae, M. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to
use curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 34-377.
Reference list 136
Schrey, A. W., Richards, C. L., Meller, V., Sollars, V., & Ruden, D. M. (2011). The role of epigenetics in evolution:
The extended synthesis. Genetics Research International, 2012(2012), 1-3. DOI: 10.1155/2012/286164
Schumacher, S., & MacMillan, J. (1993). Research in education ― A conceptual introduction. London: College.
Schumacher, S., & McMillan, J. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Boston:
Science daily (2008). Natural selection may not produce the best organisms. Public Library of Science. Online
publication. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000110. Retrieved on the 15th of June 2014 from
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080717201837.htm
Scotland, R. W. (2011). What is parallelism? Evolution Development, 13(2), 214-227.
Scott, E. C. (2009). Evolution vs. creationism: An Introduction. Greenwood: California
Scott, P., Clayton, L., & Richard, B. (2000). Phytodetoxification of hazardous organomercurials by genetically
engineered plants, Nature Biotechnology, 18(2), 213-217.
Selden, S. (2007). Biological determination and the narrative of adjustment: The high school biology textbooks of
Trumann Jesse moon. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(2), 159-196.
Shenton, K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative social science. London: Routledge.
Shreeve, J. (2009). Oldest skeleton of human ancestor found. National Geographic Magazine. Retrieved on the
20th
of June 2014 from: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/10/01_ardiskeleton.shtml
Shulman, A. (2006). Qualitative difference between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive
Psychology, 52(2), 170-194. DOI: 10.1016/J cogpsych.2005.10001.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-
14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge growth in teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational
Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Sikes, P., & Piper, H. (2008). Risky research or researching risk? The real role of ethics review. In: Satterthwaite
J, Watts, & H. Piper (Eds.), Talking truth confronting power (pp. 51–65). Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham
Books.
Simanek, D. E. (2008). Didaktikogenic Physics Misconceptions: Student misconceptions induced by teachers
and textbooks. Retrieved on 22rd
of June 1012 from
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/miscon.htm
Sinclair, A., Pandavis, M. P., & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students belief
about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(10), 118-
125
Skoog, G. (1979). Topic of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks: 1900-1977. Science Education,
63(5), 621-640.
Skoog, G. (1984). The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks published in the 1980s. Science
Education, 68(2), 117–128.
Skoog, G. (2005). The coverage of human evolution in high school biology textbooks in the 20th Century and in
current state science standards. Science and Education, 14 (3-3), 395-422.
Skoog, G., & Bilica, K. (2002). The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: a lever for change in
evolution education? Science Education, 86(4), 445-462.
Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change
learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111–126.
Smith, P., diSessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of
knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3 (2), 115-163.
Southerland, S., Abrams, E., Cummins, C., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students explanations of
biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85(4), 328-348.
Spiegel, A. N., Evans, M. E., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2006). Museum visitors understanding of evolution.
Museums and Social Issues, 1(1), 69–86.
Reference list 137
Spindler, L., & Doherty, J. (2009). Assessment of the teaching of evolution by natural selection through hands on
simulation. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, 6 (July, 2009), 1-20.
Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2003). Investigating the impact of computer conferencing: content analysis as a
manageable research tool. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact,
integrate, impact: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers
in learning in tertiary education, Adelaide, 7–10 December 2003.
Stears, M. (2006). The FET curriculum and teaching of evolution. What are the challenges facing teachers?
Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference of the South African Association of Science and
Technology Educators, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, pp. 177-182 (p.178-183 on CD).
Takayama, H., & Wakabayashi, M. (2008). Preliminary reports on changes of anthropology description in high
school textbooks (Japanese history and world history) that have received official approval.
Anthropological Science, 116(2), 207-210
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 7(3), 263-269.
Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomenon.
Science Education, 75(1), 57-67. DOI: 10.1002/sec.3730750106.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1995). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Merrill.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. London:
Cassell.
Taylor, C.E., & Cope, C. (2007). Are there multiple thresholds in the concept of evolution, and can they be
identified using dimensions of variation? In Proceedings of the Symposium Science Teaching and
Learning Research, September 27 & 28, 2007, UniServe Science: Sydney, 101-106.
Textbooks in teaching and Learning (2006). Brookes eJournal of learning and teaching, 2(1), 1-15.
Thagard, P., & Findlay, S. (2009). Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to accepting evolution by natural selection.
Science and Education (August 2009). Online publication: DOI 10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8
The Cambridge University Press (2012). Cambridge School Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press.
The Dictionary (2014). Vocabulary.com. Retrieved on the 2rd of August from
http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/pragmatic
The Indian Express (2014). HRD (Human resources development) minister asked to act on errors in class XII
books. The Indian Express Online Media Pvt. Ltd. Retrieved on the 20th
of June 2014 from http://0-
search.proquest.com.innopac.wits.ac.za/docview/1535398070?accountid=15083
The National Commission on Teaching and Americas Future (1996). What matters most: teaching for Americas
Future. Retrieved on the 7th of June 2015 from
https://books.google.co.za/books?id=BMudAAAAMAAJ&q=What+Matters+Most:+teaching+for+America
%27s+Future.&dq=What+Matters+Most:+teaching+for+America%27s+Future.&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahU
KEwjt3-TB973KAhXD6w4KHXADBSoQ6AEIGzAA
The Online Dictionary (2016). Retrieved on the 19th of March 2016 from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/
The University of California Museum of Palaeontology, Berkeley (2006). Misconceptions. Accessed on the 12th
of
June 2014 from http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/index.ahtml.
The University of Liege: The school of physical sciences (2009). Retrieved on the 17th
0f March 2014 from
http://www.physsci.cam.ac.uk/researchinsps.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of
Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. DOI: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
Thompson, J. (2008). Use the word evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(1), 42-43.
Tidon, R., & Lewontin, R. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 27(1), 124-131.
DOI: 10.1590/52425-475720054000100021.
Reference list 138
Tshuma, T. (2012). The influence of Further Education and Training teacher support materials on misconceptions
about evolution. Unpublished BSc Honours research report. University of the Witwatersrand. South
Africa.
Tshuma, T., & Sanders, M. (2015). Textbooks as a possible influence on unscientific ideas about evolution.
Journal of Biological Education, 49(4), 354-369, DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2014.967274
van Dijk, E. M. (2009). Teachers views on understanding evolutionary theory: A PCK-study in the framework of
the ERTE-model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 259–267.
van Dijk, E., & Reydon, T. (2010). A conceptual analysis of evolutionary theory for teacher education. Science
Education, 19(6–8), 655–677.
van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33-36.
Retrieved on the 24th of January 1015 from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214
Vlaardingerbroek, B., & Roedroek, C. (1997). Evolution education in Papua New Guinea: trainee teachers view.
Educational studies, 23(3), 363-375. DOI: 10.1080/0305569970230303
Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2011). Responsible research publication: international standards for authors. A position
statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24.
Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel
(Ed.), (1994). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York:
Macmillan Publishing Company.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Weiss, M., & Dreesmann, C. (2014). Aspirations and expectations: comparing scientist and teacher views as a
source of ideas for teaching evolution. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(5): 421-431.
Retrieved on the 20th of April from http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2014.020504
White, R. (1985). The importance of context in educational research. Research in Science Education, 15(1), 92-
102.
Wittrock, M.D. (1977). The Human Brain. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy: Prentice-Hall
Woodward, A., & Elliott, D. (1987). Evolution and creationism in high school textbooks. The American Biology
Teacher, 49(3), 164-170.
Writing@Colorado State University (2014). Content analysis. Downloaded from the Web Site of Colorado State
University on August 3, 2014: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=61.
Yates, B., & Marek, A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: a study of factors contributing to high school
biology students acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and
Outreach, 7(7), 1-14. DOI: 10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2
Yates, B., & Marek, E. (2013). Is Oklahoma really ok? A regional study of the prevalence of biological evolution-
related misconceptions held by introductory biology teachers. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(6),
1-20.
Yin, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving
biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461-477.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Applications of case study. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remediation of improving biology
learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(40), 461-477.
Zane Education (2015). Visual learning – subtitled educational videos, quizzes, study tools, lesson plans.
Retrieved on the 22rd of April 2015 from: http://www.zaneeducation.com/
Zhang, Y., &. Wildemuth, B. M. (1966) Qualitative analysis of content. Retrieved on the 1st of August from
https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~yanz/Content_analysis.pdf