Reaction cross sections of unstable nuclei Contents What is reaction cross section ( R )? R...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

223 views 0 download

Transcript of Reaction cross sections of unstable nuclei Contents What is reaction cross section ( R )? R...

Reaction cross sections of unstable nuclei

Contents• What is reaction cross section (R)?

• R Effective matter density distributions of unstable nuclei

• How to measure R.

RIBLL in IMP, RIPS in RIKEN• Recent results in 14-18C isotopes• Summary

A. Ozawa (University of Tsukuba)

Density distributions (Density distributions ( ) of stable ) of stable nucleinuclei

• R A1/3

• Neutron radii ≈ proton radii even for 48Ca, 208Pb

• Diffuseness is constant. a ~ 0.6 fm

How are unstable nuclei?

No thick neutron skin!r

ProtonNeutron

Text book says……

Same radii for mirror pairs

How to deduce of unstable nuclei• Proton elastic scattering at ~400 MeVTested for stable nuclei R&D for unstable nuclei

• Electron scatteringCharge distribution can be deduced. R&D for unstable nuclei (SCRIT in RIBF etc. ) • Reaction cross section (interaction cross section) with different energiesAlready applied to unstable nuclei

(11Be: M. Fukuda et al., Phys. Lett. B 268 (1991) 339. )

(H. Sakaguchi et al., PRC57(98)1749)

Interaction cross-section (Interaction cross-section (II) and rea) and reaction cross section (ction cross section (RR))

• Definition of interaction cross-section (I);

Cross section for the change of Z and/or N in incident nucleus

• Reaction cross-section (R)

R = I + inela, inela: inelastic cross-section

If inela is small enough, R ≈ I. At relativistic energy (~1 A GeV)

Glauber model Optical Limit approximatioGlauber model Optical Limit approximationn

= 2π 1 - T(r)0

∞r drR

T(r) = exp - q(r,z)-∞

∞ dz

q(z) = dη-∞

∞ 2π T(r,z,b,η) P(r,z,b,η) b db

0

T(r):Transmission function

:effective NN cross-sections

of target of projectile

r2 = r2

0

∫ ρP r( )•4πr2dr

Mean square radii

(Zero range calculations)

P(r) = 2π-3/2 -3 (1-1/A)-3/2 exp(-x2) (1+ (N-2) /3x2)x = (r/)2

Harmonic-oscillator type (p-shell)

NN has an energy dependence.

Energy at RIBF

Energy at GSI

Glauber model

Energy at RIPS/RIBLL

Sensitivity of R to the densities

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 2 4 6 8 10

12C+

12C

Transmission function

r (fm)

30 A MeV

300 A MeV

radius(12C+12C)

Assumption for shape of densitiesAssumption for shape of densities

(r) = HO()-type (r < rc)

Y exp(-r)/r2 (r ≥ rc)

rc

Example : Effective Example : Effective of of 1111LiLi

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

100 100010-6

10-5

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

0 2 4 6 8 10

Energy (A MeV)

R (m

b)

r (fm)

Den

sity

(nu

cleo

n/fm

3 )

Finite range

Zero range

by energy dependence

by target dependencePLB287(1992)307

C target

Famous two neutron halo nucleus

Deduced is consistent with one deduced by other method.

Principle of measurement Principle of measurement

I = -1/t log(No/Ni)

Target (thickness t)

Ni(AZ) No(AZ)

Transmission method

Carbon

R = I + inela

Particle identification is important!Estimation of inela is also important.

RIBLL in IMP

B -E -TOF/B -E-TOF is possible.

E/A<50 MeV

Z.Sun et al., NIMA503(2003)496

Measurements of R at intermediate energies

14Be14Be

11Li 11Li

8He8He

9Li9Li

0 20 40 60 80

TOF (ns)

2

4

6

8

E (

a.u.

)

2

3

4

5

Z

3.0 3.4 4.23.8

A/Z

Good particle identification!

Results of particle identificationResults of particle identification

Before reaction target After reaction target

8 0 0

1 0 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 6 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

E n e r g y ( A M e V )

1 4B

8 0 0

1 0 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 6 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

E n e r g y ( A M e V )

1 4B e

8 0 0

1 0 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 6 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

E n e r g y ( A M e V )

1 5B

Results in RIBLL

We obtained only interaction cross sections (I)with large error bars……

A.Ozawa et al., NIMB in press

Predictions by phenomenological formulae

I (

mb)

I (

mb)

I (

mb)

Q

QQ

QQ

Q S

D

S

QQ

Q

S

D

QQ

QS

F1

F2

F3

Q : Quadrupole MagnetS : Sextupole MagnetD : Dipole MagnetF1~3 : Forcus 1~3

Be production target

Primary beam from RRC

SlitAl wedge degraderPPACPlastic scintillator

SlitPPACSiPlastic scintillatorCarbon target

PPACPlastic scintillatorSiNaI

( )E

( )E

( )E

B

TOF

TOF

Experimental setup in RIPSExperimental setup in RIPS

RIPS in RIKEN

Good transmission!

Large momentum acceptance

p// of fragments

E/A<100 MeV

Q: Quadrupole MagnetD: Dipole MagnetF1~3: Focus 1~3

Results of particle identificationResults of particle identification

After reaction targetCase for 16C

Identification is not so easy…..However, good transmission is achieved after the reaction target.

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

C isotopes (C target)

900AMeV83AMeV

R/

I ( )mb

A

Recent results in C isotopes(in RIPS/FRS)

14C

RIPS data

Pure p1/2Pure s1/2

D.Q.Fang et al., PRC 69 (2004) 034613. 15C

RIPS data

16C

RIPS data

RIPS data

17CC.Wu et al., NPA 739 (2004) 3. T.Zheng et al., NPA709(2002)103.

Pure s1/2

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

2400

10 100 1000

R ( )mb

(Energy A )MeV

10-7

10-6

10-5

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

0 5 10 15 20

(fm

-3)

r (fm)

18C (Preliminary)

RIPS data

Summary

• Reaction cross section (R) measurements are powerful tools to investigate matter density distributions ( ) of unstable nuclei.

• R with low energy can be measured at RIBLL and RIPS.

• We deduced for 14-18C. Relatively large tail for 15-18C.

• We will extend the measurements to other heavier nuclei in RIBF in RIKEN and CSR in IMP.

Related topics in this symposium:by Wang-san (23Al) and Wu-san (17C)

List of collaborators

A.Ozawa1, X.Z.Cai2, Z.Q.Chen2, M.Chiba3, D.Q.Fang2, M.Fukuda4, Z.G.Guo5, N.Iwasa6, T.Izumikawa7, R.Kanungo8, R.Koyama7, J.X.Li5, R.S.Mao5, T.Ohnishi3, T.Ohtsubo7, W.Q.Shen2, W.Shinozaki7, T.Suda3, Z.Y.Sun5, T.Suzuki9, M.Takahashi7, I.Tanihata8, W.D.Tian5, J.S.Wang5, M.Wang5, Y.B.Wei2, C.Wu10, G.Q.Xiao5, Z.G.Xiao5, T.Yamaguchi9, Y.Yamaguchi3, A.Yoshida3, W.L.Zhan5, H.Y.Zhang2, T.Zheng10, C.Zhong2

1University of Tsukuba, 2Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, 3

RIKEN, 4Osaka University, 5Institute of Modern Physics, 6Tohoku University, 7Niigata University, 8TRIUMF, 9Saitama University, 10Peking University

I strongly appreciate Chinese collaborators!