Radiative Decays @ Radiative Decays @ LHCbLHCb

Vanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow)Vanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow)On behalf of LHCb CollaborationOn behalf of LHCb Collaboration

Outline

• Radiative penguins & photon polarization in Radiative penguins & photon polarization in

b→ s b→ s transitionstransitions

• Event Selection Event Selection

• Probing for the photon polarization in Probing for the photon polarization in BBss → →

• Early dataEarly data

•SummarySummary

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 22

Loops and Penguins

•Rare (Rare (≡≡“loop-induced” “loop-induced” ) and especially ) and especially penguin-mediatedpenguin-mediated decays are essential decays are essential part of part of LHC(b)LHC(b) physics program: physics program:•Electroweak penguinElectroweak penguin BB00 →K →K*0*0 ++--

• talk by talk by Will ReeceWill Reece

• Gluonic penguin Gluonic penguin BBss→ → • Talk by Olivier Leroy , also charmless B-decays, talk by Lorence CarsonTalk by Olivier Leroy , also charmless B-decays, talk by Lorence Carson

•Hunting for “Hunting for “SUSY/HiggsSUSY/Higgs penguin”: penguin”: BBss → →++--

• talk by talk by Diego Martinez SantosDiego Martinez Santos

And the radiative penguins are here And the radiative penguins are here … …

10.9.2k+9

LHC(b)LHC(b) penguinariumpenguinarium

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 33

Radiative penguins

•Radiative penguin decays of Radiative penguin decays of BB++&B&B00 mesons mesons have been discovered by have been discovered by CLEOCLEO and both and both inclusive inclusive b→sb→s and exclusive decays have and exclusive decays have been intensively studied by been intensively studied by CLEOCLEO, , BaBaRBaBaR and and BelleBelle

• Br(b →sBr(b →s) ) is one of the most efficient killer for is one of the most efficient killer for New Physics Models New Physics Models

• BelleBelle has observed has observed BBss → →

10.9.2k+9

BelleBelle: O(1 : O(1 BBss→→)/day at Y(5S))/day at Y(5S)

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 44

Why penguins are attractive?

• The clear picture in SM:The clear picture in SM:

•One diagram dominanceOne diagram dominance

•One Wilson coefficient One Wilson coefficient CC77effeff(())

• Reliable theoretical description at Reliable theoretical description at (N)NLO (N)NLO allows allows the numerically precise predictionsthe numerically precise predictions

• LoopsLoops

•New Physics contribution can be comparable and New Physics contribution can be comparable and even dominating to (small) even dominating to (small) SMSM amplitudes amplitudes

•NP appears not only in modifications of NP appears not only in modifications of BrBr, but also , but also in asymmetries and the angular effects in asymmetries and the angular effects

•““Sensitive also to spin structure of NPSensitive also to spin structure of NP””

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 55

• Not so rare decaysBr(B→K*0 ) = (4.3±0.4)x10-5

Br(Bs→ ) = (3.8±0.5)x10-5

•1-amplitude dominance

•strong phase appears at order of s or 1/mb

→“Direct” asymmetries are small (<1%) for b→s & a bit larger O(10%) for b→d

•Photons are polarized• Mixing asymmetries

vanishes, *BUT*

Exclusive radiative penguins

10.9.2k+910.9.2k+9

Suppressed by : s , 1/mb or |VCKM|

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCbVanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 66

Mixing asymmetries are vanished, but …

• B→ B→ ffCPCP is not is not CPCP eigenstate! eigenstate! RR//LL ≈m ≈mss/m/mbb

•Take it into account:Take it into account:

• SM:SM:

•C = 0 direct CP-violationC = 0 direct CP-violation

•S = S = sin2sin2sinsin

•AA = = sin2sin2coscos 10.9.2k+9

not not suppressed!suppressed!

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 77

B0→ KS 0

BaBarBaBar BelleBelle(sin2(sin2 ) ~ 0.4 ) ~ 0.4

88

s/s≠ 0

• CC is practically zerois practically zero• 1 diagram dominance 1 diagram dominance

•SS is a product of is a product of CPCP-eigenstate fraction -eigenstate fraction andand (small) (small) phase difference of phase difference of BBss oscillation and oscillation and b→sb→s penguin penguin

•double smallness is double smallness is SMSM

•AA is just a fraction of is just a fraction of CPCP-eigenstate -eigenstate

• ≡≡ Fraction of wrongly polarized photonsFraction of wrongly polarized photons

•No “other” suppression factors, only No “other” suppression factors, only ss//ss

Essentially Essentially we study we study CPCP-violation -violation in in BBss→→ as as an instrument an instrument to to probe Lorentz structure of probe Lorentz structure of b→sb→s transitionstransitionsF.Muheim, Y.Xie & R.Zwicky, F.Muheim, Y.Xie & R.Zwicky, Phys.Lett.B664:174-179,2008Phys.Lett.B664:174-179,2008

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 99

Expected performance for Bs→ at LHCb

• What we “What we “know”know” now: now:

•The yield is 11k per 2 fbThe yield is 11k per 2 fb-1-1 (and 70k of (and 70k of BB00→ K→ K*0*0) )

• Background is Background is

• <6k @ 90%CL<6k @ 90%CL

• The mass resolution ~96 MeV/The mass resolution ~96 MeV/cc22

• Ecal resolutionEcal resolution

• The proper time resolution: The proper time resolution: ~78fs~78fs

• 50/50 50/50 11=52fs, =52fs, 22=114fs=114fs

L.Shchutska L.Shchutska et alet al, CERN-LHCb-2007-030, CERN-LHCb-2007-030

10.9.2k+9

LHCbLHCb: O(3 : O(3 BBss→→)/hour at )/hour at 2x102x103232

Full Monte Carlo simulationFull Monte Carlo simulation

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1010

Trigger

• Hardware Hardware L0L0 trigger for photons with high trigger for photons with high EETT

• Next trigger levels (software) :Next trigger levels (software) :

•Photon confirmation (& suppression of Photon confirmation (& suppression of mergedmerged ) ) and single (or pair) detached track reconstructionand single (or pair) detached track reconstruction

• ~ 70%~ 70%

•Full reconstruction of Full reconstruction of BBss → → candidatecandidate

•Reconstruction of Reconstruction of -candidate -candidate

•““inclusive inclusive ” trigger ” trigger

More details in dedicated talk More details in dedicated talk by Leandro de Paulaby Leandro de Paula

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1111

Large overlap, Large overlap,

high redundancy & high redundancy & robustness: robustness: ~ 95% ~ 95%

Event selection

• B-decay products do not point to reconstructed primary vertices

•Exclusively reconstructed B-candidate does point to primary vertex

• B-candidate is associated with the primary vertex with minimal impact parameter (significance)

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1212

Signal proper time resolution

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1313

Sensitivity to sin2

• To evaluate our sensitivity to To evaluate our sensitivity to sin2sin2

• toy Monte Carlo (10toy Monte Carlo (1044 experiments) experiments)

• Unbinned maximum likelihood fitUnbinned maximum likelihood fit

•Proper lifetime & error Proper lifetime & error

•Reconstructed mass Reconstructed mass

• Per-event proper time errorsPer-event proper time errors

• Resolutions & Efficiencies from Resolutions & Efficiencies from full MC full MC

• Parameterize the background from mass-sidebands Parameterize the background from mass-sidebands

• Important ingredient – proper time acceptance Important ingredient – proper time acceptance functionfunction

L.Shchutska L.Shchutska et alet al, CERN-LHCb-2007-147 , CERN-LHCb-2007-147

10.9.2k+9

m(Bm(Bss) = 5.367 GeV/) = 5.367 GeV/cc22

(B(Bss) = 1.43 ps) = 1.43 ps

ss = 0.084 ps = 0.084 ps-1-1

mmss = 17.77 ps = 17.77 ps-1-1

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1414

Proper time acceptance

10.9.2k+9

a = 0.74 psa = 0.74 ps-1-1

c = 1.86c = 1.86

dN/dt dN/dt ss(t) (t)

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1515

Proper time acceptance

•It is a vital to know it with very high precisionIt is a vital to know it with very high precision

•5% bias in “5% bias in “aa” -> bias in ” -> bias in sin2sin2 ~ 0.2 ~ 0.2

•We are planning to calibrate it using three We are planning to calibrate it using three techniques:techniques:

• BB00→ K→ K*0*0

• BBss→ → J/ J/

• “ “per-event-acceptanceper-event-acceptance” (“swimming” method)” (“swimming” method)

•The acceptance could be extracted from data for all The acceptance could be extracted from data for all casescases

•E.g. with ~E.g. with ~OO(1%) precision for (1%) precision for BB00→ K→ K*0*0

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1616

Background parameterization

•Fit separately left and Fit separately left and

right sidebandsright sidebands

10.9.2k+9

LeftLeft RighRightt

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1717

Results: (A(A,,CC,,SS))

10.9.2k+910.9.2k+9

(A(A)=0.22)=0.22 ((SS)=)=((CC)=0.11)=0.11

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCbVanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1818

2fb2fb-1-1

• Already with “early” Already with “early” data the data the measurements of measurements of direct CP-asymmetry in direct CP-asymmetry in B→ KB→ K*0*0

•Double ratio:Double ratio:

•Measurement of Measurement of B→B→KK

“early measurements”

10.9.2k+910.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCbVanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 1919

The first 13 minutes @The first 13 minutes @

nominal luminosity nominal luminosity

B→ KB→ K*0*0

Conclusions

• LHCbLHCb has good potential for measurement has good potential for measurement of photon polarization in of photon polarization in BBss→→ decay decay

•For 2 fbFor 2 fb-1-1: :

(A(A)=0.22, )=0.22, ((SS)=)=((CC)=0.11)=0.11

•The determination of proper time acceptance The determination of proper time acceptance function from data in under the study: function from data in under the study:

•Three methodsThree methods

•The result has The result has moderatemoderate dependency on dependency on B/SB/S

Stay tuned and wait for more newsStay tuned and wait for more news

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2020

Backup slidesBackup slides10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2121

Example of models

•Anomalous right-handend top couplings Anomalous right-handend top couplings J.P.Lee’03J.P.Lee’03

10.9.2k+9

= -cos 2= -cos 2

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2222

B: proper-time in sidebands

•Fit separately left and right sidebandsFit separately left and right sidebands

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2323

Signal proper time resolution as function of Signal proper time resolution as function of coscos

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2424

Signal proper time resolution as function of Signal proper time resolution as function of coscos

10.9.2k+9

-1.0 : --1.0 : -0.50.5

-0.5 : -0.15-0.5 : -0.15

-0.15 : 0.3-0.15 : 0.3 0.3: 1.00.3: 1.0

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2525

The shape of background

•Vary the “short/long”-lived componentsVary the “short/long”-lived components

10.9.2k+9

Relative changeRelative change Absolute changeAbsolute change

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2626

Stability tests: B/S

•There is some dependency on There is some dependency on B/SB/S level: level:

10.9.2k+9

Conservative Conservative UL @ 90% UL @ 90% CLCL

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2727

Results: pulls

10.9.2k+9

AA

CCSS

Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2828

Resolution and ss//ss

•Vary the proper time resolutionVary the proper time resolution

•Use simple model with two Gaussians and vary Use simple model with two Gaussians and vary the proportionthe proportion

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 2929

Acceptance function

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 3030

Background parameterization

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 3131

Likelihood

10.9.2k+9 Vanya Belyaev: Radiative decays @ LHCb 3232