Post on 06-Jan-2016
description
QUANTUM MODEL OF HYDROGEN ATOM
prof. Ing. Pavel Omera, CSc.
Brno University of Technology
osmera @fme.vutbr.cz
September 14-16, 20115th Meeting on Chemistry and Life 2011
Main ideas and differencesMENDEL2010
a) spiral structure as the fractal-spiral structure b) fractal-ring structure Fractals seem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. Fractal dimension and fractal measure, are crucial parameters for such description.
a) b) c)Vortex structures: a) the vortex VB at the drain hole of bath-tub, b) the vortex tornado-vortex VT c) the vortex in the PET bottle
Topological transformation
MENDEL2009
The vortex-fractal-ring structure of the electron Mauritsson Johan: online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/atto06/mauritsson/
The fractal ring structure of the electronMENDEL2010
The fractal ring structure of the electronMENDEL2007
MENDEL2007
Ampers law Couloms law
This result is in coincidence with the well-known Einsteins law.
The levitating electron in the field of the proton The electron-proton structure of hydrogendprotonelektronn=7MENDEL2010MENDEL2007n=1n=1
The line spectrum of hydrogen atomPerhaps the decreasing width 2n of spectrum lines (as 23 = a - b) depends on energy Eio and kinetic energy Er . This energy can vary in the interval {Ea, Eb} for {a, b} and E = Eb - Ea = Eio/(202) = Er /20 = 0.069eV (for n1=2 a different size n2>n1). It can be caused by precession of the electron. a b
a bMENDEL2010
neutron proton
for ro FmaxMENDEL2007
For Eo=0MENDEL2007
n=1n=1n=1 to 7MENDEL2010
de Broglies equation
The spin of the electron Magnetic momentum Mz B is Bohr magneton
_1266949198.unknown
_1266950185.unknown
_1338735988.unknown
_1338736057.unknown
_1338736552.unknown
_1338736651.unknown
_1338736257.unknown
_1338736024.unknown
_1266950230.unknown
_1266949995.unknown
_1266950027.unknown
_1266949840.unknown
_1266945520.unknown
_1266945840.unknown
_1266946109.unknown
_1266945760.unknown
_1266944621.unknown
_1266945491.unknown
_1266943766.unknown
Quantum physicsMENDEL2010
r1 = 0.7223517245ro ~ 0.382, r2 = 1.792517214ro ~ 0.948 the couple constant
Covalent bond
The spin of the electron Vortex structures with spin 1/2MENDEL2010
the vortex structure of the electromagnetic field (photons)MENDEL2009 the structure of the electric field the structure of the magnetic field
Lim, T.T.: serve.me.nus.edu.sg/limtt/
Lim, T.T.: serve.me.nus.edu.sg/limtt/
Examples of spiral structures: a), b) galaxies, c), d) the Earths hurricane
Jupiters spot
History (2004)alpha particle
Vortex structures
One hole Two holes
Structure of light as a ring particle or a wave energy structure
Logarithm of complex number (Re) dark matter
Polarization of a light rayPhoton coming though the sheet with two holes. a) The photon before the way through, b) the photon vortex structure is split to two sub-vortex structures (e.g.: osmeron rays), c) the photon behind the sheet
Forces between two gravitational parallel fibers
Vortex structure of light raysExample: how we can measure the wavelength of lightDiffraction on the DVD surface
ZElementZconfiguration O81s22s22p4 Oxygenthe classical structure model of the water molecule H2O
Element A=Z+N configuration C121s22s22p2 Carbon
atomsnucleusHHeTDOCNFNeMENDEL2010
benzene molecule
Ball lightningPlasma BallMENDEL2010
PhotonMENDEL2011
Electromagnetic field of the electron MENDEL2011
The structure of water MENDEL2011
The structure of the gold MENDEL2011
Structure the of hydrogen atom
The structure of hydrogen with one layer of the electromagnetic field
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsW8zctD7CM MENDEL2011 magnetic liquid
Conclusions The annular-vortex model might be better than a classical planetary one. Vortex structures can explain the electromagnetic field. Fractals seem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. To understand the electromagnetic field requires a high degree of imagination. The degree of imagination that is required is much more extreme than that required for some of the ancient ideas. The modern ideas are much harder to imagine. We use mathematical equations and rules, and make a lot of pictures. We cant allow ourselves to seriously imagine things, which are obviously in contradiction to the known laws of nature. And so our kind of imagination is quite a difficult game (or a puzzle). One has to have the imagination to think of something that has never seen before, never been heard before. At the same time the thoughts are restricted or limited by the conditions that come from our knowledge of the way nature really is. The problem of creating something which is new, but which is consistent with everything, which has been seen before, is one of extreme difficulty.
******************