Post on 13-Dec-2015
PULSE LASER WIRE Laser pulse storage in an optical cavity as a beam monitor & an X-ray source
PULSE LASER WIRE Laser pulse storage in an optical cavity as a beam monitor & an X-ray source
Kaori Takezawa
Kyoto Univ.
2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF
12th Dec. / 2004
Kaori Takezawa
Kyoto Univ.
2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF
12th Dec. / 2004
1. OVERVIEW
2. PRINCIPLE
3. OPTICAL CAVITY
4. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
5. CONCLUSION
6. FUTURE PLAN
1. OVERVIEW
2. PRINCIPLE
3. OPTICAL CAVITY
4. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
5. CONCLUSION
6. FUTURE PLAN
22
1.OVERVIEW 1.OVERVIEW
33
Pulse Laser Wire
(Storage laser pulses in optical cavity ):
The systems for New X-ray source & New bunch length monitor at a storage ring
1.OVERVIEW 1.OVERVIEW
33
714MHz Cavity
Electron repetition rate : 357MHzElectron bunches
Laser Repetition rate : 357MHz laser pulses
ScatteredGamma beam
Compton Scattering in every 357MHz
As an X-ray source :
An optical cavity store higher peak power and get higher flux X-ray with pulse CW laser than CW laser.
As Beam monitor :
By scanning the laser pulse’s phase in the cavity and measuring the Compton signal count rate ; an electron bunch length profile is obtained.
Phase Scan
2.PRINCIPLE : Storage of laser pulse2.PRINCIPLE : Storage of laser pulse
44
Resonance condition : Perfect resonance : L = L
Not resonance : L ≠ L
Imperfect Resonance : L ~ L
laser
laser
laser
cavity
cavity
cavityThe relationship with laser and cavity :
The ext. cavity’s parameters ; enhancement factor , reflectivity , …. is the function of Δl and laser pulse width.
2.PRINCIPLE : Enhancement factor 2.PRINCIPLE : Enhancement factor
55
The reflectivity is bigger at resonance point with Δl ≠0,.this means that enhancement factor is smaller . And data says laser pulse width.
2.PRINCIPLE :Count rate& Measurement2.PRINCIPLE :Count rate& Measurement
66
σ = σ +σ +σ +σ
~ σ
Laser pulse width
-
Laser beamwaist
e bunch length
e h-beamsize-22 22 2
Phase
σ = σ +σ
Verticalposition
22 2
Laser beamwaist
e v-beamwaist-
Signal flux
Laser pulse width
2 The electron bunch length is 20 ~ 40 psec (10mm) > Laser pulse width ( FWHM =7 psec ; 1 mm) >> Laserwire beamwaist( 120um ), electron’s horizontal beamsize ( 100um )
Suppose both electron bunch and laser pulses have a Gaussian intensity distribution, The measured profile is also a Gaussian shape.
3.OPTICAL CAVITY : The design3.OPTICAL CAVITY : The design
88
• Cavity length : 714 MHz +/- 2 kHz ( from PZT dynamic range )
• Mirrors
• The radius of curvature : 250 mm
• The reflectivity : 0.997 +/- 0.001
• Beamwaist > 200 um
Cavity length is 210mm. It is easy to adjust cavity length with short cavity.For cavity’s dynamic range , long PZT is used ( 10um ).
Finesse is ~ 1000 . But Maximum finesse is ~ 500 ,when the cavity , the length is 714MHz , stores laser pulses, which repetition rate is 357MHz. For enhanced laser pulses in the cavity , Next pulse come after 4times reflection
It is difficult to make thin laserwires at long cavity length .
Adjustment with PZT714MHz
ρ= 250mmR = 0.997
3.OPTICAL CAVITY : feedback circuit3.OPTICAL CAVITY : feedback circuit
99
Transmission
Mode locked Laser
Laser Rep.rate feedback
Signal Generator
Ring RF standard 10MHz
357MHz
PZT voltage
PI circuitDC
Shoulder feedback system( OFF : background)
By a phase detector, the signal is synchronized with Ring 357MHz
A trombone for a signal delay
←
Feedback ON/OFF
4.EXPERIMENTAL SETUP : Optics4.EXPERIMENTAL SETUP : Optics
1111
Isolator
Cavity
Transmission
Reflection
Injection mirrors
Laser head
λ/2 λ/4
5.CONCLUSION : Timing scan5.CONCLUSION : Timing scan
1313
2.8 nsec
Bunch length
← Compton signal
In timing scan, we detect Compton signals and the laser pulse’s phase in cavity when signals come.
Enhanced laser pulses 2times go and back in the cavity , and are scattered 4times every 2.8 nsec.
5.CONCLUSION : count rate 5.CONCLUSION : count rate
1414
Calculated maximum count rate is ~ 2500 [Hz/mA] .
Actual count rate is ~ 1500 because of imperfectly adjustment cavity length with shoulder feedback system.
σ=laser beamwaist
5.CONCLUSION : VS. RF voltage5.CONCLUSION : VS. RF voltage
1515
Data at 19th Nov. had a sharp peak , but There was no peak at 01st Dec. ( Because of the change Ring tune ? )
5.CONCLUSION : VS. the beam current5.CONCLUSION : VS. the beam current
1616
When the number of electron per bunch is bigger , The Gauusian shape of scattered photons count rate change. (The life time of low current electron beam at ring is long )
Count rate [Hz/mA]
Phase [psec]
6. FUTURE PLAN 6. FUTURE PLAN
1717
• For high count rate :
• Problems as a bunch length monitor :
• And now
We plan the higher finesse cavity (mirror R=0.999) and thin laserwire with beamwaist 50um. In the plan , the enhancement factor is 10 times as much as current systems. New feedback system, Tilt locking can adjust cavity length at resonance peak . We will test those systems in this winter.
In current systems, It takes about 20 seconds for data taking . Data can be taken at low current electron beam , but at high current beam cannot .
Next week, we will measure bunch length with pulse laser wire timing scan and streak camera. If I can, we will test tiltlocking feedback system.
Kyoto Univ.Kyoto Univ.
NIRSNIRS
JaeriJaeri
KEKKEK
ISSPISSP
And you !!And you !!
Thanks !Thanks !
2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF12th Dec. / 2004
2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF12th Dec. / 2004