Porto Walti EDEN Paris 2008 Presentation

Post on 13-Jun-2015

384 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Presentation of the Action Research project conducted by S. Porto and C. Walti on the adoption, implementation and support of e-portfolios as part of the Master of Distance Education program at UMUC. This was presented at the EDEN Research Workshop in Paris 2008.

Transcript of Porto Walti EDEN Paris 2008 Presentation

StellaC.PortoUniversityofMarylandUniversityCollege

ChristineWaltiAnneArundelCommunityCollege&UniversityofMarylandUniversityCollege

Focus

  OngoingresearchonthesupportingandexpansionofMDEstudentseportfolios  Effectivenessofcurrentimplementationmethodology

  Studentpreparationforthee‐portfolioactivity  Necessarysupporttolifelonge‐portfolios

Overview

  Contextandlandscape  Actionresearchactivities&findings  Newstrategies  Actionplan  Initialpilotresults

ContextandlandscapeUMUC

Online enrollment > 177,000

Head count > 86,000

Enrollment > 272,000

2nd largest state institution in the US

> 100 degree programs fully online

ContextandLandscape:TheMasterofDistanceEducation

ContextandLandscape:Thecapstonecourse

ContextandLandscape:Thecapstonecourse

ContextandLandscape:TheMDEe‐portfolioactivity

  Deliverableofthecapstonecourse  Duringthecapstonestudentalsohavetocompleteamajorresearchproject

  Shouldserveasa‘reflection’oftheMDEjourneyandprofessionalportraitforstudents

Actionresearchactivities&findings• Promotingtheuseoflearningjournals

• MDEstudentlounge•  Continuoussupport:

answeringstudentsquestions

•  Noprescribedorsuggestedactivities

• Creationoftheeportfoliotutorial

Actionresearchactivities&findings • Reviewofexisting

e‐portfolios

• Surveywithstudents

Actionresearchactivities&findings  Majorchallenges

  Permanence  Lackofnecessaryskillset  Latestart  Lackofsupport  Lackofinstitutionalsupport  Lackofcorrelationwiththecurriculum  Lackofinvolvementofotherstakeholders  Grading  Lackofstructureandcriteriaforassessment

Actionresearchactivities&findings

  Permanence  Lackofnecessary

skillset  Lackofsupport  Lackof

institutionalsupport

  Latestart  Lackofcorrelationwiththecurriculum

  Lackofinvolvementofotherstakeholders

  Grading  Lackofstructureandcriteriaforassessment

Actionresearchactivities&findings

  Permanence  Lackofnecessary

skillset  Lackofsupport  Lackof

institutionalsupport

  Latestart  Lackofcorrelationwiththecurriculum

  Lackofinvolvementofotherstakeholders

  Grading  Lackofstructureandcriteriaforassessment

  Useofweb2.0apps

  Defaultinstitutionallimitedsupport

  Rubric  Directtiestoprogramoutcomesassessment

  MDEeportfolioorientationrunningeverysemester

Web2.0explosionofappsandservices:social/sharing&mediarich

E‐portfoliousingWeb2.0apps(blog)

e‐portfolioWeb2.0app

RubricandassessmentCoreLearningareas&MDEoutcomesassessmentplan

MDEeportfolioorientation

MDEeportfolioorientation:pilotandfeedbacksurvey

How useful was the information shared throughout the workshop? Average = 4.5 (Max. 5)

How useful was the interaction during the workshop? Average = 3.9 (Max. 5)

What is the likelihood that you recommend this workshop to another MDE peer? ? Average = 4.75 (Max. 5)

Finalremarks

  Importanceofcontinuingorientation  Challengeofbringinginmorestakeholders  Technologyissue

  Institutionalsupport  Pros  Cons

  Web2.0advantage  Nextstep

  RelationshipwithMDEprogramgoals  Assessmentanduseofrubric

Thank you…

Contact: sporto@umuc.edu

christine.walti@uni-oldenburg.de >