Physics-Itiiciiitm.com/profanurag/Physics-Class/Phys-Lect-Sch-Equ.pdfPhysics-I Dr. Anurag Srivastava...

Post on 23-Mar-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of Physics-Itiiciiitm.com/profanurag/Physics-Class/Phys-Lect-Sch-Equ.pdfPhysics-I Dr. Anurag Srivastava...

Physics-I

Dr. Anurag Srivastava

Web address: http://tiiciiitm.com/profanurag

Email: profanurag@gmail.com

Visit me: Room-110, Block-E, IIITM Campus

2

• Electrodynamics: Maxwell’s equations: differential and integral forms, significance of Maxwell’s equations, displacement current and correction in Ampere’s law, electromagnetic wave propagation, transverse nature of EM waves, wave propagation in bounded system, applications.

• Quantum Physics: Dual nature of matter, de-Broglie Hypothesis, Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its applications, postulates of quantum mechanics, wave function & its physical significance, probability density, Schrodinger’s wave equation, eigen values & eigen functions, Applications of Schroedinger equation.

Syllabus

Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger

Born: 12 Aug 1887 in Erdberg, Vienna, Austria

Died: 4 Jan 1961 in Vienna, Austria

Nobel Prize in Physics 1933

"for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory"

An equation for matter waves

2

2Try

t x

2 2

2i

2t m x

Seem to need an equation

that involves the first

derivative in time, but the

second derivative in space ( , ) is "wave function" associated with matter wavex t

,

i kx tx t e

As before try solution

So equation for matter waves in free space is

(free particle Schrödinger equation)

• Solve this equation to obtain y

• Tells us how y evolves or behaves

in a given potential

• Analogue of Newton‟s equation

in classical mechanics

Schrödinger’s Equation

Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961)

• This was a plausibility argument, not a derivation. We believe the Schrödinger equation not because of this argument, but because its predictions agree with experiment.

• There are limits to its validity. In this form it applies only to a single, non-relativistic particle (i.e. one with non-zero rest mass and speed much less than c)

• The Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation in x and t (like classical wave equation). Unlike the classical wave equation it is first order in time.

• The Schrödinger equation contains the complex number i. Therefore its solutions are essentially complex (unlike classical waves, where the use of complex numbers is just a mathematical convenience).

Schrödinger’s Equation

Interpretation of |y|2

• The quantity |y|2 is interpreted as the probability that the

particle can be found at a particular point x and a

particular time t

• The act of measurement „collapses‟ the wave function

and turns it into a particle

Neils Bohr (1885-1962)

An equation for matter waves

2

( , )2

pE V x t

m

2 2

2i ( , )

2V x t

t m x

For particle in a potential V(x,t)

Suggests modification to Schrödinger equation:

Time-dependent Schrödinger equation

Total energy = KE + PE

Schrödinger

What about particles that are not free?

2 2

, ,2

kx t x t

my y

Has form (Total Energy)*(wavefunction) = (KE)*(wavefunction)

2 2

2i

2t m x

,i kx t

x t e

Substitute into free particle equation

2

2

pE

m

(Total Energy)*(wavefunction) = (KE+PE)*(wavefunction)

gives

The Schrödinger equation: notes

2 2

2i ( , )

2V x t

t m x

• This was a plausibility argument, not a derivation. We believe the Schrödinger

equation not because of this argument, but because its predictions agree with

experiment.

• There are limits to its validity. In this form it applies only to a single, non-

relativistic particle (i.e. one with non-zero rest mass and speed much less than c)

• The Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation in x and t (like

classical wave equation). Unlike the classical wave equation it is first order in time.

• The Schrödinger equation contains the complex number i. Therefore its

solutions are essentially complex (unlike classical waves, where the use of

complex numbers is just a mathematical convenience).

• Note the +ve sign of i in the Schrödinger equation. This came from our looking

for plane waves of the form

We could equally well have looked for solutions of the form

Then we would have got a –ve sign.

This is a matter of convention (now very well established).

i te i te

The Hamiltonian operator

2 2

2i ( , )

2V x t

t m x

ˆi Ht

Can think of the RHS of the Schrödinger equation as a

differential operator that represents the energy of the

particle.

Hence there is an alternative

(shorthand) form for the time-

dependent Schrödinger equation:

This operator is called the Hamiltonian of

the particle, and usually given the symbol H2 2

2ˆ( , )

2

dV x t H

m dx

Kinetic

energy

operator

Potential

energy

operator

Hamiltonian is a linear differential operator.

Schrödinger equation is a linear homogeneous partial differential equation

Time-dependent

Schrödinger equation

Interpretation of the wave function

2 2

0( , ) ( , ) d

bb

xx a a

x t x x t x

2 * 2

( , )x t x

Ψ is a complex quantity, so how can it correspond to real physical

measurements on a system?

Remember photons: number of photons per unit volume is proportional to

the electromagnetic energy per unit volume, hence to square of

electromagnetic field strength.

Postulate (Born interpretation): probability of finding particle in a small

length δx at position x and time t is equal to

Note: |Ψ(x,t)|2 is the probability per unit length. It is

real as required for a probability distribution.

Total probability of finding particle

between positions a and b is

a b

|Ψ|2

x

δx

Born

An equation for matter waves:

the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

2 2

2 2 2

1

x v t

wave velocityv

Classical 1D wave

equation

e.g. waves on a string:

Can we use this to describe matter waves in free space?

( , )x t

x ( , ) wave displacementx t

Try solution ,

i kx tx t e

But this isn‟t correct! For free particles we know that

2

2

pE

m

DOUBLE-SLIT EXPERIMENT REVISITED

Detecting

screen

Incoming coherent

beam of particles

(or light)

sind

D

θ

y

1

2

Schrödinger equation is linear: solution with both slits open is 1 2

Observation is nonlinear 1 2

2 2 2 * *

1 2 2 1

Usual “particle” part Interference term

gives fringes

Normalization

Total probability for particle to be somewhere should always be one

Suppose we have a solution to the

Schrödinger equation that is not

normalized. Then we can

•Calculate the normalization integral

•Re-scale the wave function as

(This works because any solution to

the SE multiplied by a constant

remains a solution, because the SE

is LINEAR and HOMOGENEOUS)

Normalization condition 2( , ) d 1x t x

1( , ) ( , )x t x t

Ny y

2( , ) dN x t x

New wavefunction is normalized to 1

A wavefunction which obeys this

condition is said to be normalized

2 2( , ) ,

( , ) 0,

x t a x a x a

x t x a

Particle with un-normalized wavefunction

at some instant of time t

Normalizing a wavefunction - example

Conservation of probability

Total probability for particle to be somewhere should ALWAYS be one

2( , ) d constantx t x

If the Born interpretation of the wavefunction is correct then the normalization

integral must be independent of time (and can always be chosen to be 1 by

normalizing the wavefunction)

We can prove that this is true for physically relevant wavefunctions

using the Schrödinger equation. This is a very important check on the

consistency of the Born interpretation.

2 2

2i ( , )

2V x t

t m x

2( , ) d constantx t x

Boundary conditions for the wavefunction

The wavefunction must:

1. Be a continuous and single-valued

function of both x and t (in order that

the probability density is uniquely

defined)

Examples of unsuitable wavefunctions

Not single valued

Discontinuous

Gradient discontinuous

x

( )xy

( )xy

x

( )xy

x

2. Have a continuous first derivative

(except at points where the potential is infinite)

3. Have a finite normalization integral

(so we can define a normalized probability)

Time-independent Schrödinger equation

Suppose potential is independent of

time

2 2

2i ( )

2V x

t m x

LHS involves only

variation of Ψ with t

RHS involves only variation of Ψ

with x (i.e. Hamiltonian operator

does not depend on t)

Look for a separated solution ( , ) ( ) ( )x t x T ty

Substitute:

, ( )V x t V x

2 2

2( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

2x T t V x x T t i x T t

m x ty y y

2 2

2 2( ) ( ) ( )

dx T t T t

x dx

yy

2 2

2( )

2

d dTT V x T i

m dx dt

yy y

N.B. Total not partial

derivatives now

etc

2 2

2

1 1( )

2

d dTV x i

m dx T dt

y

y

Divide by ψT

LHS depends only on x, RHS depends only on t.

True for all x and t so both sides must be a constant, A (A = separation constant)

2 2

2( )

2

d dTT V x T i

m dx dt

yy y

1 dTi A

T dt

2 2

2

1( )

2

dV x A

m dx

y

y

So we have two equations, one for the time dependence of the wavefunction and

one for the space dependence. We also have to determine the separation constant.

This gives

/( ) iEtT t aeThis is like a wave i te

with /A . So A E .

1 dTi A

T dt

dT iAT

dt

/( ) iAtT t ae

1 dTi A

T dt

2 2

2

1( )

2

dV x A

m dx

y

y

SOLVING THE TIME EQUATION

• This only tells us that T(t) depends on the energy E. It doesn‟t tell us what the

energy actually is. For that we have to solve the space part.

• T(t) does not depend explicitly on the potential V(x). But there is an implicit

dependence because the potential affects the possible values for the energy E.

21

TIME INDEPENDENT SCHROEDINGER EQUATION

Erwin Schroedinger

Consider a particle of mass „m‟, moving with a velocity

„v‟ along + ve X-axis. Then the according to de Broglie

Hypothesis, the wave length of the wave associated

with the particle is given by

mv

h

A wave traveling along x-axis can be represented by the equation

xktieAtx ,

22

Where Ψ(x,t) is called wave function. The differential equation of matter wave in one

dimension is derived as

08

2

2

2

2

yy

VEh

m

dx

d

The above equation is called one-dimensional Schroedinger’s wave equation in one

dimension.In three dimensions the Schroedinger wave equation becomes

08

08

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

y

y

yyyy

VEh

m

VEh

m

zyx

2 2

2

d( )

2 dV x E

m x

yy y

With A = E, the space equation becomes:

This is the time-independent Schrödinger

equation

H Ey y

Solving the space equation = rest of course!

Time-independent Schrödinger equation

or

But probability

distribution is static

2 * / /

2*

, , ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

iEt iEtP x t x t x e x e

x x x

y y y

y y y

/( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) iEtx t x T t x ey y Solution to full TDSE is

Even though the potential is independent of time the wavefunction still oscillates in time

For this reason a solution of the TISE is known as a stationary state

Notes

• In one space dimension, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is an ordinary differential equation (not a partial differential equation)

• The time-independent Schrödinger equation is an

eigenvalue equation for the Hamiltonian operator:

Operator × function = number × function

(Compare Matrix × vector = number × vector)

• We will consistently use uppercase Ψ(x,t) for the full wavefunction (TDSE), and lowercase ψ(x) for the spatial part of the wavefunction when time and space have been separated (TISE)

H Ey y

2 2

2

d( )

2 dV x E

m x

yy y

Energy of the electron

Energy is related to the Principle Quantum number, n.

This gives 3 of the 4 quantum numbers, the last one is the spin

quantum number, s, either +½ or – ½.

Wave

Functions: Probability to find

an electron

Energy of the electron

Electron Transitions give off Energy as

Light/Xrays

E=hc/

Red/Blue Clouds in Space

Zeeman Effect

Light Emission in Magnetic Field

Multi-electron Atoms

(Wolfgang) Pauli Principle Exclusion Principle

No 2 electrons with same quantum numbers!

Energy Eigenvalues

Eigen value and Eigen Function

Applications:

Operators in Quantum Mechanics