Post on 02-Dec-2015
description
POROSITY
Many slides contain more detailed notes that may be shown using the “Notes Page View”
Acknowledgments
• Dr. Walt Ayers, PETE 311, Fall 2001• NExT PERF Short Course Notes, 1999
– Note that many of the NExT slides appears to have been obtained from other primary sources that are not cited
Definition: Porosity is the fraction of the bulk volume of a material (rock) that is occupied by pores (voids ).
Discussion Topics
• Origins and descriptions
• Factors that effect porosity
• Methods of determination
RESERVOIR POROSITY
ROCK MATRIX AND PORE SPACE
Rock matrix Pore spaceNote different use of “matrix”by geologists and engineers
Porosity: The fraction of the bulk volume of a rock that is occupied by pores
b
mab
b
p
VVV
VV
Porosity −==φ=
POROSITY DEFINITION
• Porosity is an intensive property describing the fluid storage capacity of rock
ROCK MATRIX AND PORE SPACE
Rock matrix Water Oil and/or gas
OBJECTIVESTo provide an understanding of• The concepts of rock matrix and porosity• The difference between original (primary) and
induced (secondary) porosity• The difference between total and effective
porosity• Laboratory methods of porosity determination• Determination of porosity from well logs
CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKSSEDIMENTARY
Roc
k-fo
rmin
gpr
oces
sSo
urce
of
mat
eria
l
IGNEOUS METAMORPHIC
Molten materials in deep crust andupper mantle
Crystallization(Solidification of melt)
Weathering anderosion of rocks
exposed at surface
Sedimentation, burial and lithification
Rocks under high temperatures
and pressures in deep crust
Recrystallization due toheat, pressure, or
chemically active fluids
SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
• Clastics
•Carbonates
•Evaporites
CLASTIC AND CARBONATE ROCKSClastic Rocks
Consist Primarily of Silicate Minerals
Are Classified on the Basis of:
- Grain Size- Mineral Composition
Carbonate RocksConsist Primarily of Carbonate Minerals(i.e. Minerals With a CO Anion Group)
Limestone - Predominately Calcite (Calcium Carbonate, CaCO3)Dolomite - Predominately Dolostone (Calcium Magnesium Carbonate, CaMg(CO3)2 )
3-2
Relative Abundances
Siltstoneand shale(clastic)
~75%
Sandstoneand conglomerate
(clastic)~11%
Limestone anddolomite
~14%
SEDIMENTARY ROCK TYPES,
SandGrains
ClayMatrix
ChemicalCement
QuartzFeldsparRock Fragments
QuartzCalcite
Hematite
IlliteKaoliniteSmectite
AverageSandstone
AverageMudrock(Shale)
AllochemicalGrains
ChemicalCement
MicrocrystallineMatrix
Calcite
FossilsPelloidsOolitesIntractlasts
Calcite
AverageSparry
LimestoneAverageMicritic
Limestone
Clastic Rocks Carbonate Rocks
Comparison of Compositions of Clasticand Carbonate Rocks
Grain-Size Classification for Clastic SedimentsName Millimeters Micrometers
BoulderCobblePebbleGranuleVery Coarse SandCoarse SandMedium SandFine SandVery Fine SandCoarse SiltMedium SiltFine SiltVery Fine SiltClay
4,096256644210.50.250.1250.0620.0310.0160.0080.004
500250125
623116
84
(modified from Blatt, 1982)
Average Detrital Mineral Compositionof Shale and Sandstone
Mineral Composition Shale Sandstone
Clay Minerals
Quartz
Feldspar
Rock Fragments
Carbonate
Organic Matter,Hematite, andOther Minerals
60 (%)
30
4
<5
3
<3
5 (%)
65
10-15
15
<1
<1
(modified from Blatt, 1982)
SANDSTONE CLASSIFICATIONQuartz + Chert
Feldspar
UnstableRock
Fragments
5 5
25 25
25 25
2525
50 50
5010 10
Quartzarenite
Subarkose Sublitharenite
LithicSubarkose
Arko
se
LithicArkose
FelspathicLitharenite
Litharenite
(modified from McBride, 1963)
Framework
Matrix
Cement
Pores
Sand (and Silt) Size Detrital Grains
Silt and Clay Size Detrital Material
Material Precipitated Post-Depositionally,During Burial. Cements Fill Pores andReplace Framework Grains
Voids Among the Above Components
FOUR MAJOR COMPONENTS OF SANDSTONE
FOUR COMPONENTS OF SANDSTONE
MATRIXFRAMEWORK
(QUARTZ)
FRAMEWORK(FELDSPAR)
CEMENT
PORE
Note different use of “matrix”by geologists and engineers
0.25 mm
1. Framework2. Matrix3. Cement4. Pores
Engineering“matrix”
Geologist’s Classification
ORIGINS OF POROSITY IN CLASTICS AND CARBONATES
(Genetic Classification)
• Primary (original)
• Secondary (induced)(Generally more complex thanprimary porosity)
PRIMARY (ORIGINAL) POROSITY
• Developed at deposition
• Typified by– Intergranular pores of clastics or
carbonates– Intercrystalline and fenestral pores of carbonates
• Usually more uniform than induced porosity
SECONDARY (INDUCED) POROSITY
• Developed by geologic processes after deposition (diagenetic processes)
• Examples – Grain dissolution in sandstones or carbonates– Vugs and solution cavities in carbonates– Fracture development in some sandstones, shales,
and carbonates
SANDSTONES POROSITY TYPES
Intergranular (Primary)
Dissolution
Micropores
Fractures
Interstitial Void Space BetweenFramework Grains
Partial or Complete Dissolution of
Framework Grains or CementSmall Pores Mainly Between Detrital
or Authigenic Grains (Can Also OccurWithin Grains
Breakage Due to Earth Stresses
FACTORS THAT AFFECT POROSITY
• Particle sphericity and angularity
• Packing
• Sorting (variable grain sizes)
• Cementing materials
• Overburden stress (compaction)
• Vugs, dissolution, and fractures
PRIMARY
SECONDARY (diagenetic)
ROUNDNESS AND SPHERICITYOF CLASTIC GRAINS
High
SPH
ERIC
ITY
Low
VeryAngular Angular Sub-
AngularSub-
Rounded Rounded Well-Rounded
ROUNDNESS
Porosity
Poro
sity
FACTORS THAT AFFECT POROSITY
• Particle sphericity and angularity
• Packing
• Sorting (variable grain sizes)
• Cementing materials
• Overburden stress (compaction)
• Vugs, dissolution, and fractures
PRIMARY
SECONDARY (DIAGENETIC)
Line of Traverse(using microscope)
Cement
Matrix(clays, etc.)
Tangential Contact
Sutured Contact
Long Contact
Concavo-ConvexContact
GRAIN PACKING IN SANDSTONE
(modified from Blatt, 1982)
This Example
Packing Proximity = 40%Packing Density = 0.8
4 Types of Grain Contacts
Packing Proximity
Packing Density
A measure of the extent towhich sedimentary particlesare in contact with their neighbors
A measure of the extent towhich sedimentary particles
occupy the rock volume
CUBIC PACKING OF SPHERESPorosity = 0.48
Porosity Calculations - Uniform Spheres
• Bulk volume = (2r)3 = 8r3
• Matrix volume =
• Pore volume = bulk volume - matrix volume
3r4 3π
( ) 476.032
18
3/483
33
=π
−=π−
=
−=
=
rrrVolumeBulk
VolumeMatrixVolumeBulkVolumeBulkVolumePorePorosity
RHOMBIC PACKING OF SPHERESPorosity = 0.27
FACTORS THAT AFFECT POROSITY
• Particle sphericity and angularity
• Packing
• Sorting (variable grain sizes)
• Cementing materials
• Overburden stress (compaction)
• Vugs, dissolution, and fractures
PRIMARY
SECONDARY (DIAGENETIC)
Packing of Two Sizes of SpheresPorosity = 0.14
Grain-Size Sorting in Sandstone
Very WellSorted
WellSorted
ModeratelySorted
PoorlySorted
Very PoorlySorted
SORTING
Change of Composition Change of Size
Change of Shape Change of Orientation
Change of Packing
Sand
Shale
Eolian
Fluvial
Slow CurrentFast Current
River
Beach
TYPES OF TEXTURAL CHANGES SENSEDBY THE NAKED EYE AS BEDDING
PROGRESSIVE DESTRUCTION OFBEDDING THROUGH BIOTURBATION
RegularLayers
IrregularLayers
Mottles(Distinct)
Mottles(Indistinct)
HomogeneousDeposits
(Whole Core)Bioturbated Sandstone
STS61A-42-0051 Mississippi River Delta, Louisiana, U.S.A. October 1985
STS084-721-029 Selenga River Delta, Lake Baykal, Russia May 1997
FACTORS THAT AFFECT POROSITY
• Particle sphericity and angularity
• Packing
• Sorting (variable grain sizes)
• Cementing materials
• Overburden stress (compaction)
• Vugs, dissolution, and fractures
PRIMARY
SECONDARY (DIAGENETIC)
DIAGENESIS
CarbonateCemented
OilStained
Diagenesis is the Post-Depositional Chemical andMechanical Changes thatOccur in Sedimentary Rocks
Some Diagenetic Effects Include
CompactionPrecipitation of CementDissolution of Framework
Grains and Cement
The Effects of Diagenesis MayEnhance or Degrade ReservoirQuality
Whole CoreMisoa Formation, Venezuela Photo by W. Ayers
DUAL POROSITY IN SANDSTONE
MATRIX
FRAMEWORK(QUARTZ)
FRAMEWORK(FELDSPAR)
CEMENT
PORE
Note different use of “matrix”by geologists and engineers
0.25 mm
Sandstone Comp.• Framework• Matrix• Cement• Pores
DISSOLUTIONPORE
FRACTURE
1. Primary and secondary “matrix” porosity system2. Fracture porosity system
SANDSTONE COMPOSITION,Framework Grains
Norphlet Sandstone, Offshore Alabama, USAGrains ~0.25 mm in Diameter/Length
PRF KF
P
KF = PotassiumFeldspar
PRF = Plutonic RockFragment
P = Pore
Potassium Feldspar isStained Yellow With aChemical Dye
Pores are Impregnated WithBlue-Dyed Epoxy
KF
Q
Q
Q = Quartz
Photo by R. Kugler
POROSITY IN SANDSTONE
QuartzGrain
Pore
Scanning Electron MicrographNorphlet Sandstone, Offshore Alabama, USA
Porosity in SandstoneTypically is Lower ThanThat of Idealized PackedSpheres Owing to:
Variation in Grain SizeVariation in Grain ShapeCementationMechanical and ChemicalCompaction
Photomicrograph by R.L. Kugler
POROSITY IN SANDSTONE
Scanning Electron MicrographTordillo Sandstone, Neuquen Basin, Argentina
Pore Throats inSandstone MayBe Lined WithA Variety ofCement MineralsThat AffectPetrophysicalProperties
Photomicrograph by R.L. Kugler
POROSITY IN SANDSTONE
Scanning Electron MicrographNorphlet Formation, Offshore Alabama, USA
Pores Provide theVolume to StoreHydrocarbons
Pore Throats RestrictFlow through pores
PoreThroat
Secondary Electron Micrograph
Clay Minerals in Sandstone Reservoirs,Authigenic Chlorite
Jurassic Norphlet SandstoneOffshore Alabama, USA (Photograph by R.L. Kugler)
Occurs as ThinCoats on DetritalGrain Surfaces
Occurs in SeveralDeeply BuriedSandstones WithHigh Reservoir Quality
Iron-Rich Varieties ReactWith Acid
~ 10 μm
Electron Photomicrograph
Clay Minerals in Sandstone Reservoirs,Fibrous Authigenic Illite
Jurassic Norphlet SandstoneHatters Pond Field, Alabama, USA (Photograph by R.L. Kugler)
Illite
SignificantPermeabilityReduction
Negligible PorosityReduction
Migration ofFines Problem
High IrreducibleWater Saturation
INTERGRANULAR PORE AND MICROPOROSITY
IntergranularPore
Microporosity
Kaolinite QuartzDetritalGrain
Intergranular PoresContain HydrocarbonFluids
Micropores ContainIrreducible Water
Backscattered Electron MicrographCarter Sandstone, Black Warrior Basin,Alabama, USA (Photograph by R.L. Kugler)
Clay Minerals in Sandstone Reservoirs,Authigenic Kaolinite
Secondary Electron Micrograph
Carter SandstoneNorth Blowhorn Creek Oil UnitBlack Warrior Basin, Alabama, USA
Significant PermeabilityReduction
High Irreducible WaterSaturation
Migration of FinesProblem
(Photograph by R.L. Kugler)
DISSOLUTION POROSITY
Thin Section Micrograph - Plane Polarized LightAvile Sandstone, Neuquen Basin, Argentina
Dissolution ofFramework Grains(Feldspar, for Example) and Cement may Enhance theInterconnected Pore System
This is SecondaryPorosity
Pore
Quartz DetritalGrain
PartiallyDissolvedFeldspar
Photo by R.L. Kugler
DISSOLUTION POROSITY
Scanning Electron MicrographTordillo Formation, Neuquen Basin, Argentina
PartiallyDissolvedFeldspar
Dissolution PoresMay be Isolated andnot Contribute to theEffective Pore System
Photo by R.L. Kugler
SandGrains
ClayMatrix
ChemicalCement
QuartzFeldsparRock Fragments
QuartzCalcite
Hematite
IlliteKaoliniteSmectite
AverageSandstone
AverageMudrock(Shale)
AllochemicalGrains
ChemicalCement
MicrocrystallineMatrix
Calcite
FossilsPelloidsOolitesIntractlasts
Calcite
AverageSparry
LimestoneAverageMicritic
Limestone
Clastic Rocks Carbonate Rocks
Comparison of Compositions of Clasticand Carbonate Rocks
Iles GambierTuamotu Archipelago
Maldive Islands
FOLK CARBONATE ROCK CLASSIFICATION
0-1% 1-10% 10-50% Over50%
SparseBiomicrite
Micrite &Dismicrite
Fossili-ferousMicrite
PackedBiomicrite
PoorlyWashed
Biosparite
UnsortedBiosparite
SortedBiosparite
RoundedBiosparite
Over 2/3 Lime Mud Matrix Over 2/3 Spar CementSubequalSpar &
Lime MudSortingPoor
SortingGood
Rounded,Abraded
Claystone SandyClaystone
Clayey orImmature Sandstone
Sub-mature SS
MatureSS
Super-mature SS
Depositional Texture Recognizable Depositional TextureNot Recognizable
D unham Carb onate Rock Class ificatio n
D epositional Texture Re cognizable Dep ositionalT extureNotR ecognizable
MudstoneW ackestone Packston eGrainst one Boundston eCry stalineCa rbonateGrainSupporte dLacks M ud,Grain -Suppo rted
Components Not Bound T ogether Duri ng Deposition
Mud Su pported Contains M ud(clay and silt size particles<10 %Grains >10 %Grains
Orig inal Compon entsB ound Togethe rDu ring Depositi on
DUNHAM CARBONATE ROCK CLASSIFICATION
Depositional Texture Recognizable DepositionalTexture
Not Recognizable
Mudstone Wackestone Packstone Grainstone BoundstoneCrystallineCarbonate
GrainSupported
Lacks Mud,Grain-
Supported
Components Not Bound Together During Deposition
Mud Supported
Contains Mud(clay and silt size particles
<10 %Grains
>10 %Grains
Original ComponentsBound Together
During Deposition
CARBONATES POROSITY TYPES
Interparticle
Intraparticle
Intercrystal
Moldic
Pores Between Particles or Grains
Pores Within Individual Particles or Grains
Pores Between Crystals
Pores Formed by Dissolution of anIndividual Grain or Crystal in the Rock
Fenestral
Fracture
Vug
Primary Pores Larger Than Grain-SupportedInterstices
Formed by a Planar Break in the Rock
Large Pores Formed by IndiscriminateDissolution of Cements and Grains
Interparticle Intraparticle Intercrystal Moldic
Fenestral Shelter Growth-Framework
FabricSelective
Fracture Channel Vug
Non-FabricSelective
Breccia Boring Burrow Shrinkage
Fabric Selective or Not Fabric Selective
Idealized Carbonate Porosity Types
(modified from Choquette and Pray, 1970)
CARBONATE POROSITY - EXAMPLE
Thin section micrograph - plane-polarized lightSmackover Formation, Alabama (Photograph by D.C. Kopaska-Merkel)
MoldicPores
• Due to dissolutionand collapse of ooids(allochemical particles)
• Isolated pores
• Low effective porosity
• Low permeability
Blue areas are pores.Calcite
Dolomite
MoldicPore
CARBONATE POROSITY - EXAMPLE
Thin section micrographSmackover Formation, AlabamaBlack areas are pores.
(Photograph by D.C. Kopaska-Merkel)
• Combination pore system
• Moldic pores formed throughdissolution of ooids (allochemicalparticles)
• Connected pores
• High effective porosity
• High permeability
MoldicPore
InterparticlePores
Moldic andInterparticle Pores
PORE SPACE CLASSIFICATION
(In Terms of Fluid Properties)
PORE-SPACE CLASSIFICATION
• Total porosity, φt =
• Effective porosity, φe =VolumeBulk
PoreVolumeTotal
VolumeBulkPore SpacectedInterconne
• Effective porosity – of great importance;
contains the mobile fluid
COMPARISON OF TOTAL AND EFFECTIVE POROSITIES
• Very clean sandstones : φe → φt
• Poorly to moderately well -cemented intergranular materials: φt ≈ φe
• Highly cemented materials and most carbonates: φe < φt
MEASUREMENT OF POROSITY
• Core samples (Laboratory)
• Openhole wireline logs
Quartz(Framework ) Sm allPor es IsolatedPoresLarge , Interconn ectedPoresClay Surfa ces& Interlay ersClayLayers
Hydration orBound W ater Hydrocarbo nPore Volum eStructu ral(OH -) W ater
Roc kMatr ix
Total Po rosity - Neu tron LogTotal Po rosity - Den sity LogAb solute or To tal PorosityOve n-Dried Co re Analysis PorosityHumid ity-DriedCore Analy sis Porosity
Cap illaryWa ter
VShale
Sa ndston e Por osity M easur edby Va rious T echn iques
Quartz(Framework ) Sm allPor es IsolatedPoresLarge , Interconn ectedPoresClay Surfa ces& Interlay ersClayLayers
Hydration orBound W ater Hydrocarbo nPore Volum eStructu ral(OH -) W ater
Roc kMatr ix
Total Po rosity - Neu tron LogTotal Po rosity - Den sity LogAb solute or To tal PorosityOve n-Dried Co re Analysis PorosityHumid ity-DriedCore Analy sis Porosity
Cap illaryWa ter
VShale
Sa ndston e Por osity M easur edby Va rious T echn iques
SANDSTONE POROSITY MEASUREDBY VARIOUS TECHNIQUES
Quartz(Framework)
SmallPores
IsolatedPores
Large, InterconnectedPores
Clay Surfaces& Interlayers
ClayLayers
Irreducible orImmobile Water
Hydration orBound Water
HydrocarbonPore Volume
Structural(OH -) Water
RockMatrix
Total Porosity - Neutron LogTotal Porosity - Density Log
Absolute or Total Porosity
Oven-Dried Core Analysis PorosityHumidity-Dried
Core Analysis Porosity
CapillaryWater
VShale
(modified from Eslinger and Pevear, 1988)
INFORMATION FROM CORES*
• Porosity
• Horizontal permeability to air
• Grain density
• Vertical permeability to air• Relative permeability
• Capillary pressure
• Cementation exponent (m) and saturation exponent (n)
Standard Analysis Special Core Analysis
*Allows calibration of wireline log results
PDC Cutters
Fluidvent
Drill collarconnection
Inner barrel
Outer barrel
Thrust bearing
Core retainingring
Core bit
CORING ASSEMBLYAND CORE BIT
COMING OUT OF HOLEWITH CORE BARREL
Whole Core Photograph,Misoa “C” Sandstone,
Venezuela
WHOLE CORE
Photo by W. Ayers
SIDEWALL SAMPLING GUN
Core bullets
Core sample
Formation rock
SIDEWALL CORING TOOL
Coring bit
Samples
WHOLE CORE ANALYSIS vs. PLUGS OR SIDEWALL CORES
WHOLE CORE
• Provides larger samples
• Better and more consistent representation of formation
• Better for heterogeneous rocks or for more complex lithologies
• Smaller samples
• Less representative of heterogeneous formations
• Within 1 to 2% of whole cores for medium-to high-porosity formation
• In low-porosity formations, φ from core plugs tends to be much greater than φ from whole cores
• Scalar effects in fractured reservoirs
WHOLE CORE ANALYSIS vs. PLUGS OR SIDEWALL CORES
PLUGS OR SIDEWALL CORES
Sparks and Ayers, unpublished
CORE PLUG
LABORATORY DETERMINATIONOF POROSITY
NEXT:
Student Questions / Answers• intraparticle porosity in carbonates (JC1):
– vugs and fractures• why are clays important (JC1):
– one major reason is that clays conduct electricity, this can effect water saturation calculations if not accounted for
• fines (ABW):– solid particles so small that they can flow with fluids
through pores - but they can also plug pore throats• tortuousity (ABW):
– the indirect curvy flow path through the pore system to get from point A to point B
• holocene:– referring to the Holocene Epoch (geology) or in general
meaning about the last 10,000 years.