WCET 2012: Partnering for Performance –

Faculty Peer Review

Session 9:30-10:45

Nancy Lindfors, Harrison College (In)Andrew Shean, Ashford University (Ca)

Moderator: Kathi Baldwin, University of Alaska, SE Sitka

WCET: Partnering for Performance –Faculty Peer Review

Leveraging a Critical Friend Model

History:

Raising the Bar for Faculty• New Tools• New Infrastructure• New Expectations• New Roles for Deans• New Definitions• New Process

Where are we?

Rollout Implementation Evaluation and Revisions

Baseline Data

Leadership Adaptability Communication

Professional/Technical Expertise

Service Orientation

Overall Rating

2.73 2.66 2.58 2.91 2.82 2.74

Leadership

Adaptbiltiy

Communication

Professional / Technical Expertise

Service Orientation

Overall Rating 7.12

2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3

Next Steps

Continue to:• promote and train critical friends• promote value of critical friends as

peer evaluators• develop deans as instructional coaches• edit and refine tools • Leverage as needs assessment to

address training and development deficits

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2.9

1.9

3.1

2.4

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.3

0.4

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2.7

2.1

3.2

2.5

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.450.4 0.4

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2.7

1.9

3.2

2.4

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.5

0.4

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

3.1

2.3

3.4

2.5

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.3

0.2

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.53.1

2.2

3.3

2.6

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.1

0.4

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2.9

2.1

3.2

2.5

Round 1 Round 2

Change Comparison0

0.050.1

0.150.2

0.250.3

0.350.4

0.45

0.3

0.4

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Mean Score0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.53.1

2.3

Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

Mean Score0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3 2.7

All Instructors In All Areas

All Instructors In All Areas

Targeted Professional Development

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS