Post on 22-Jul-2018
N. HADJSAIDProfessor Grenoble INP/G2ELABPresident Scientific Council ThinkSmartGrids - France
Energy transition through smarter grids: from heritage to innovation
French Energy Transition Law Key pillars & scenarios for medium/long term targets
1. Renovating buildings & homes2. Clean, green transport3. Circular economy, recycling4. Renewable energy5. Nuclear energy safety6. Simplification for efficiency7. Empowering citizens
SOCIETAL, ECONOMICAL, ENVIRONMENT SCALE 6 PILLARS, 7 PROGRAMS
EconomyOpen access Multiplicity of actorsEnergy price
EnvironmentClimate-energy objectives
SocietalConsumer actor of the electrical system, Accessibility, energy services
Some tendencies on energy systems
Integrating decentralized energies close to end users, dispersed, PEB/PET, microgrids, local management of energy, consum’actor, …
70% of generation units will be RES by h 2040
2/3 of energy efficiency potential not yet explored:
Buildings, industry & infrastructures, end users and data centers seeking for performance improvement, and Carbon footprint
More EFFICIENT
More ELECTRIC
Electricity demand driven by “decarbonization” and new usages, smart devices, …
2X increase of demand Elec/energy by h 2040
1 World Energy Outlook 2012, OECD / IEA, Internal analysis/Schneider Elec.
58%
79%
82%
Industry
Infrastructure
Buildings & Data Centers
Untapped energy efficiency potential by segment1
More CONNECTED
IoT will connect at least 50 billions objects during the next 5 years
More DISTRIBUTED
•5
Integration of intermittent energy and EVs
■ EVs 1 Mo fast charging stations – 43 GW Stochastic effects – geographical and
temporal
Wind: Poweroutput of a wind farm over 1 month, UK PV: ex of Vinon sur Verdon (May 31st 2009)
6
Need for more intelligence…
Increasing complexity: how to cope? Fulfill changing needs
New usages, consum’actor, …. RES/DG integration Increased uncertainties
Need: multi-stakeholder approach
Constraints: Technological:
Build on existing assets
Maturity of technologies
Centralized vs Decentralized approaches
Economical Economical models and viability
Regulation Incentive vs “a posteriori » regulation
Eco-system exampe through an Urban SG demo project in Grenoble and Lyon, Involving the various value chain stakeholders
•8
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Specification of the transition steps to the future smart system
Connection and control of DG (PV, cogeneration…)
Aggregation platformfor load flexibility/business model for the aggregator
Energy management tools (Linky & Energy box): Appliance curtailments + behavioral and sociological studies
Integration of electric vehicles and charging stations
ICT functions Through Linky smart meter and E-Box
Smart control solutions(measurement, monitoring, analysis, self-healing…)
Innovative D-VVCfor higher RES/DG integration rate
RES insertion limitWith P/Q classical controlSmax = 2 * 900 kWWith D-VVCSmax = 2 * 2600 kW
t = 1200 s : Tension sur le réseau
0.95 p.u.
1 p.u.
1.05 p.u.
Classical P/Q ControlOvervoltagesD-VVC
GreenLys Accusinefor VVC with RES Manufactured by Schneider Electric
PV panels located in Lyon Confluence on which the "Accusine" solution was tested.
The voltages varies :by +/-1% with the AccusineAnd by +/-8% without the Accusine.!
Main lessons learned and perspectives
Mobilization of the ecosystem:Existing knowledge triangle in Grenoble:
• Education – research - valorization
Complementarity of involved stakeholders through a multi-disciplinary topic Key facilitators: available funding, strong support from local communities
Lessons learned from the projectSuccess factors:
• Strong background for collaborative projects
• Confidence gained among involved stakeholders
• Good governance: project management, human interaction, information flows, …
Key motivating outputs• Innovations with value creation: direct stakeholders’ benefits, employment, knowledge
progress, pushing further the interdisciplinary frontiers,
• Strong will for further collaboration
From GreenLys to Multi-Scale Smart Energy at a district levelFueling the created fruitful collaborative dynamic System approach for multi energy SG: from the end user to the District Level
• 11
From GreenLys to the concept of Enernet District: The Ecosystem of the Grenoble « presqu’ile »
Courtesy: Tenerrdis
A system approach for Smart-energy (multi-energy, multi-level) design and management at the district level quartier
Courtesy: Tenerrdis
Courtesy: Tenerrdis
A system approach for Smart-energy (multi-energy, multi-level) design and management at the district level quartier
Courtesy: Tenerrdis
A system approach for Smart-energy (multi-energy, multi-level) design and management at the district level quartier
Business models for mgrids
Microgrid DC
Energy Cockpit
House of Enernet
Microgrid & flexibilité
Multi-vector energy
Courtesy: Tenerrdis
A system approach for Smart-energy (multi-energy, multi-level) design and management at the district level quartier
Large consumersHousesIndustriesLaboratories
• 17
Microgrids DC
Multi-vectors Energy
Existing Infrastructure
Microgrids and flexibility
System
EnernetHome
Energy Cockpit
Business Models of microgrids
• Urban Super
2.0
• Urban Super conductor
• Smart substation 2.0
Avoiding massive investments in a dense territory
Designing and implementing collaborative smart energy systems
Taking into account DG intermittency
Valorizing flexibilities from buildings and EVs
Qualify the new business models
Accompanying the new role of "consum'actor"
Guaranteeing the replicability of the model
Objectives and structures of the collaborative Multi-energy/ multi scale Smartgrid at a district level
Example of the Enernet Cockpit
• Modelling of the realistic local energy system
• Simulating evolutive scenarii for establishing master plans at different time horizons
Digital Platform for Energy
• Mapping in real time the production, consumption and data flow of the different energy carriers
• Managing the system by guaranteeing the provision to the users and the balance of the grid at all times
• Accompanying local actors (consumers, private producers, network operators, etc.) to manage energy through new economic models
Conclusion
■ Major societal stakes■ Climate – Energy – security of supply
■ Energy transition and paradigm change
■ Grid issues: Increasing ComplexityRES on the rise and evolution of consumption patterns
Increasing uncertainty level
Technological, economical and regulatory challenges
■ From Heritage to innovationPower grid: evolution vs. revolution
Need for a system view: avoid analysis per « segment »
Complementarity of local and global actions
Remarkable field of scientific and technological developments
■ Managing transitions for a Smarter Grid …■ High Added value
■ Developing know-how and fostering employment