MIMMIM) Missouri Integrated Model (MIM) Advisory Group Meeting January 15, 2009 Jefferson City,...

Post on 12-Jan-2016

218 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of MIMMIM) Missouri Integrated Model (MIM) Advisory Group Meeting January 15, 2009 Jefferson City,...

MMissouri IIntegrated MModel (MIM)MIM)Advisory Group Meeting

January 15, 2009Jefferson City, Missouri

Welcome

Heidi Atkins Lieberman , Assistant Commissioner, Division of Special Education

Implementation Facilitators

Introducing…

Mary Dell BlackMeg SneedRoberta BrennanSarah SpenceBen Franklin

MIM Overview

Ronda Jenson, Ph.D.Director of ResearchUMKC Institute for Human Development

Outline

• MIM Work to Date• Description of MIM• Description of MIM pilot schools• MIM Resources

MIM Work To-Date

• Development phase (2007-2008)–Forming teams–Drafting model, processes, and

materials–Getting stakeholder input and

feedback– Identifying pilot schools for

2008-2009• Pilot phase (2008-2009)

What is MIM?

The Missouri Integrated Model (MIM) is a framework that pulls together evidence-based components and processes. MIM includes:

• Tiered levels of support,• Essential features of effective schools, &• Effective Implementation processes

What is MIM?

80-90% 80-90%

10-15%10-15%

1-5% 1-5%

Tiered Levels of Support

Academic Behavior

Core, evidence-based instruction for all students

Integrated Systems

Core, evidence-based instruction for all students, plus targeted instruction for some students

Core, evidence-based instruction for all students, plus intensive individualized instruction

11 Essential Features

Build and sustain capacity for responding to student needsShared vision and commitmentLeadership at state, district, & building levelsCollaborative environment Ongoing professional developmentEducator support through mentoring and coachingCulturally responsive practices

Maximize resources needed for innovationResource mappingFamily and community involvement

Make informed decisionsEvidence-based practicesData based decision-makingProgress monitoring

Outcomes

MIM PROCESSES

Practices seem to be "influenced by fads and fashions that are adopted overenthusiastically, implemented inadequately, then discarded prematurely in favor of the latest trend.”

Walshe & Rundall (2001) reporting on health systems

"All organizations are designed, intentionally or unwittingly, to achieve precisely the results they get.“

R. Spencer DarlingFounder of the Leadership Institute,

Chicago

“There is an eager emphasis on growth. Instead…

What doesn’t work…

• Dissemination of information by itself • An adoption decision is not

implementation• Training alone, no matter how well done, • Implementation by edict • Implementation by “following the money”• Implementation without changing

supporting roles and functions

Paul Nutt (2002). Why Decisions Fail

• The usability of a program has little to do with the quality or weight of the evidence regarding that program

• Evidence about intervention effectiveness for specific populations helps us choose what to implement

• Evidence about the effectiveness of the intervention does not help implement the program or practice successfully

What does work…

A mission-oriented process involving multiple decisions, actions, and corrections

Implementation as a process, not an event

Successful and sustainable implementation of evidence-based practices and programs always requires organizational change.

National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, &

Wallace, 2005)

MIM EQUATION

Adapted from National Implementation Research Network

(NIRN) (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005)

Stages of Implementation

Exploration & Adoption: Taking inventory, Looking at reality, Setting priorities

Program Installation: Setting the stageInitial Implementation: Taking action, Self-

monitoring, Plan revisited, Getting ready for scaling-up

Full Operation: Scaling-upInnovation: Planning for sustainabilitySustainability: Cycle of implementation

MIM Pilot Year 1

StepsKick-OffGetting ReadySelf-studyAction planImplement

Action Plan

SupportImplementation

FacilitatorsTA NetworkDESE

MIM Toolkits & Guides

Implementation BlueprintGetting Ready ToolkitSelf-Study GuideAction Plan Toolkit

MIM Pilot Building Timeline (2008-2009)

• MIM Kick-Off (September 2008)

• Complete the MIM Getting Ready Toolkit (September -October 2008)

• Complete the MIM Self-Study (October-December 2008)

• Complete the MIM Action Plan (January 2009)

• MIM Mid-Year Meeting (January 2009)• Begin addressing priority items on MIM Action Plan

(February-May 2009)

14 Pilot Districts/ 14 Schools

Sikeston R-6 : 7th and 8th Grade Ctr. Centralia R-VI: Chance Elem. (PK-4) Raytown C-2: Eastwood Hills Elem. (K-5) Grandview C-4: Grandview Middle (6-8) Linn County R-I: Linn Co. Elem. (PK-6) Lewis County C-1: Highland Elem. (K-6) Nodaway-Holt R-VII: Nodaway-Holt Elem. (K-6) Willow Springs R-IV: Willow Springs Elem. (PK-4) Meramec Valley R-III: Meramec Valley Middle (6-7) Joplin R-VIII: Memorial Middle (6-8) St. Charles R-VI: Harris Elem. (K-4) Hazelwood: Southeast Middle (6-8) Sheldon R-VIII: Sheldon Elem. (PK-6) Henry County R-I : Windsor Elem. (K-6)

District SizeNumber of Students

MIM Districts

37%

36%

27%

Missouri

37%

39%

24%

MAP Scores

WWW.MIMSCHOOLS.ORG

District Showcase

Grandview Middle SchoolLinn Co. Elementary School

Grandview C-4

GRANDVIEW C-4 GRANDVIEW MIDDLE

Linn County R-1

LINN CO. R-I LINN CO. ELEM.

Break

World Café Activity

“Awakening and engaging collective intelligence through conversations about questions that matter.”

--www.theworldcafe.com

World Café Activity

Step 1: Join a conversation topic. Step 2: Introduce yourself and briefly

identify your role or the “hat(s)” you wear.

Step 3: From your perspective, contribute to the conversation around the posed questions.

Step 4: After approximately 30 minutes, everyone will have the option of moving to another conversation table.

Working Lunch

World Café Presentation