MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM

Future Building Program – Building Performance Analysis

February 2017

Energy Analysis – Key Assumptions• Space Usage: New Museum Program, February 2017

• Building Form: Rinka|Chung Concept Design, November 2016

• Window to Wall Ration (WWR)

• Overall: 43%

• North: 70%

• East: 36%

• South: 54%

• West: 16%

• Typical / Code compliant envelope performance

• Typical / Code compliant MEP systems

Sun path – Spring/Fall Equinox

Sun path – Spring/Fall Equinox

Solar Exposure

Annual Energy Breakdown

Annual Cost Breakdown

Annual Cost Breakdown - Heating

Orientation & Annual Energy CostBaseline

(0°)

+ $5,019

(45°)

+ $3,271

(90°)

-$873

(135°)

-$2,821

(315°)

+ $844

(180°)

+ $2,739

(225°)

+ $1,325

(270°)

Glazing Window to Wall Ratio• North: 70%• East: 36%• South: 54%• West: 16%

BenchmarkingSources:

• CBECs (DOE)

• MPM 2016 Utility Bills

• EnergyStar Portfolio Manager

Planning for the Future – Fuel Costs

2015 – 2050 Predictions

• Natural Gas +25% to 114%

• Electricity -3% to + 25%

High and low range dependent upon economic growth, technology and fuel scarcity

Source: EIA

Electricity

Natural Gas

Planning for the Future – Climate Change

Source: NOAA

2015 – 2050 Predictions

+ 8% to 18% mean daily temp.

Approaching Net Zero• Improved envelope insulation

• Triple pane glazing

• High thermal performance framing

• LED lighting & controls

• DOAS with radiant heating/cooling

• Geothermal Exchange

• PV array182

167

7051

240

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

CBECs ExistingFacility

ConceptDesign

EnergyStarMedian

EnhancedDesign

EUI (

KB

tu/y

ear)

Energy Use Intensity

QUESTIONS?

aeieng.com

AEI/Affiliated Engineers, Inc.

@AEITweets