Post on 03-Sep-2020
MIFID II WITHIN THE CMU
LANDSCAPE
Josina Kamerling, Head of Regulatory Outreach, EMEA
CFA Institute
19th of June
National Bank of Romania
2
CHALLENGES FOR CMU & ASSET
MANAGEMENT
TRUST IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY (EDELMAN
2016)
3
TRUST IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY (EDELMAN
2016)
4
TRUST IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY (EDELMAN
2016)
5
TRUST IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY (EDELMAN
2016)
6
7
CAPITAL MARKETS UNION; A
FRAMEWORK FOR MIFID?
8
Source: Fleishman Hilliard
REGULATORY AVALANCHE POST CRISIS
Citizens buy financial products mainly in their home country
9
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/capital-markets-union/index_en.htm
FINANCIAL MARKETS FOR INVESTORS
Where does the average EU family invest its money?
10
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/capital-markets-
union/index_en.htm
WHY A CAPITAL MARKETS UNION?• Capital markets have expanded in the EU over recent decades:
1. €8.4 trillion total stock capitalization (around 65% of GDP) by end 2013 versus €1.3 trillion in 1992 (22% of GDP).
2. Total value of outstanding debt securities exceeded €22.3 trillion (171% of GDP) in 2013, compared to €4.7 trillion (74% of GDP) in 1992.
Stock market capitalization (2013)*
*as % of GDP
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/capital-markets-union/index_en.htm
11
• Nonetheless, European market remain underdeveloped in comparison with other jurisdictions
BARRIERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF EU
CAPITAL MARKETS (CMU 2015)
65%63%
49% 48%47%
27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Differences intaxation treatmentacross jurisdictions
Differences in legalframeworks
surrounding theownership and
transfer of securities
Protectionist policiesinhibiting cross-
border mergers andacquisitions
Administrativeburdens associatedwith the issuance ofsecurities (includingprospectus and filing
requirements)
Insufficientsecondary market
liquidity in corporatedebt markets
Lack of investordemand for SMEs
% Barrier (Top Two Box 4 + 5)
Q: To what extent are each of the following a barrier to the development of EU capital markets?
Scale: Please rate each on a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 means it is not a barrier at all and 5 means it is a huge barrier.
12
CFA INSTITUTE’S RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN
COMMISSION GREEN PAPER ON RETAIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES (FINANCIAL PRODUCTS)
• CFA believes that high professional standards of ethics, knowledge andcompetency for investment management professionals help to reduce the risksof mis-selling and ensure that client interests.
• Role for EU-wide regulation on product governance through conduct ofbusiness rules (I.e. MiFID) and through product disclosure standards
- PRIIPs Regulation to ensure product transparency, comprehensibility, andcomparability
Past performance exclusion is alarming
• Overall, the combination of high industry standards and production regulation,for example on the PRIIPs KID, should combine to provide the best outcomesfor retail investors.
• CFA Institute believes that the full implementation of PRIIPs KID in the MemberStates will improve the transparency and comparability of financial products inthe EU.
13
• Several challenges related to cross-border financial services can be over with
digitalization and FinTech.
- Support of EC proposal on EU prospectuses digital database
- Overcoming lack of knowledge
• Financial services industry will increasingly use ‘robo-advisers’.
- Overcoming barriers such as cost of investment advice, access to products,
and physical or geographic human advice.
• CFA Institute conducted a member survey on automation in financial advice
and other FinTech issues in 2016. It offers important confirmation of some of
the potential benefits of automated financial advice.
14
PROMOTING GREATER LIQUIDITY IN
CORPORATE DEBT MARKETS (CMU 2015)
72%70%
65%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Greater standardisation ofissuances to facilitate
secondary market trading onelectronic platforms
Greater price transparency Establish common standardsfor private placement markets
Reduce regulatory burdenplaced on banks (dealers)
% Necessary (Top Two Box 4 + 5)
Q: How necessary, if at all, are each of the following measures to promote greater liquidity in corporate debt markets?
Scale: Not necessary at all 1 2 3 4 5 Very necessary
15
RETAIL INVESTORS
16
HOUSEHOLDS FINANCIAL ASSETS IN THE EU & US
(%TOTAL ASSETS; AVERAGE 2007 – 14)
17
MATCHING HOUSEHOLDS & GOVERNMENTS’
ASSETS AND NFC LIABILITIES: THE BALANCE
SHEET OF THE (FINANCIAL) ECONOMY (€BN;)
18
EQUITY HOLDING BY TYPE OF HOLDER (€MN;
AVERAGE 2010-14)
19
Citizens buy financial products mainly in
their home country
20
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/capital-markets-union/index_en.htm
FINANCIAL MARKETS FOR INVESTORS
Where does the average EU family invest its money?
21
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/capital-markets-
union/index_en.htm
EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S ACTION PLAN FOR
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES
• The EU has already taken a number of measures to achieve a Single Market in consumerfinancial services (I.e. Payment Accounts Directive, Digital Single Market Strategy).
• In the CMU action plan, the Commission committed to developing stronger capital marketsacross the EU and also on how to improve access to retail investment products.
• The Action Plan seeks to open national barriers as only 7% of consumers currently buyfinancial services from another EU Member State.
• The Commission has identified three main strands of further work to move a step closer to agenuine Single Market for financial services:
o Increase consumer trust and empower consumers.
o Reduce legal and regulatory obstacles affecting businesses.
o Support the development of an innovative digital world.
• Consumer protection is a national competence remit.
22
CFA INSTITUTE’S RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN
COMMISSION GREEN PAPER ON RETAIL FINANCIAL
SERVICES (FINANCIAL PRODUCTS)
• CFA believes that high professional standards of ethics, knowledge and competency for
investment management professionals help to reduce the risks of mis-selling and ensure that
client interests.
• Role for EU-wide regulation on product governance through conduct of business rules (i.e.
MiFID II) and through product disclosure standards
o PRIIPs Regulation to ensure product transparency, comprehensibility, and comparability
Past performance exclusion will be confusing for investors.
• Overall, the combination of high industry standards and production regulation, for example on
the PRIIPs KID, should combine to provide the best outcomes for retail investors.
• CFA Institute believes that the full implementation of PRIIPs KID in the Member States will
improve the transparency and comparability of financial products in the EU.
23
• Digitalization & FinTech create challenges related to cross-border financial services.
o Support of EC proposal on EU prospectuses digital database.
o Overcoming lack of knowledge. Financial education needs to be taken into account.
• Financial services industry will increasingly use ‘robo-advice’.
o Overcoming barriers such as cost of investment advice, access to products, and physical or
geographic human advice.
o Downside is related to fiduciary responsibility to investors.
24
25
CFA INSTITUTE’S SECONDARY
CORPORATE BOND MARKET
LIQUIDITY SURVEY (2016)
26
• Respondents from AMER & EMEA report that over the last five years:
- A decrease in the liquidity of high yielding & investment corporate bonds (no
change for government bonds)
- A decrease in the number of active dealers making markets
- An increase in the time taken to execute trades & a lower proportion of
bonds being actively traded
- A higher proportion of unfilled orders.
• Notably bank capital and liquidity regulations have had a significant impact
on bond market liquidity.
• Respondents from APAC report had entirely different observations.
27
28
29
CFA INSTITUTE’S GLOBAL FINTECH
SURVEY (2016)
Key findings:
- 70 % of the respondents think mass affluent investors to be positively affected
- 89 % of the respondents think there is a positive impact on costs for
consumers
- 62 % access to advice will be improved
- 55 % product choice will increase
- 54 % of the respondents believe that Asset Management would be the sector
most influenced
- EU respondents place greater weight on Banking than on Asset Management
30
31
MIFID II OVERVIEW
32
Transparency
Integrated & Efficient Markets
Improved Market Access
Single Rulebook
Level Playing Field
Reduced costs
Improved supervision
MiFID II
OBJECTIVES
MIFID II OVERVIEW
33
Knowledge & Competency
rules
Trade transparency
Market microstructure
aspects
Conduct of business
MiFID II
• Best interests of client
• Best execution
• Reporting to client
• Client categorisation
• Suitability and appropriateness
• Product governance
• Inducements (commissions, advice, research)
• Provisions on automated trading
• Market making requirements
• Exchange and trade venues
system requirements
• Algo trading and registration
• New standardized tick size framework
• Obligation to display prices & volumes
• Extension of transparency to non-equities
• Double volume cap for dark pools
• Trading obligation
• Transaction reporting
• Data publication and access
• Staff must acquire appropriate
knowledge AND have
appropriate experience
• Applies to anyone giving
investment advice
• Firms must develop training to make
up for any shortfall
• Member States will set their own
assessment standards
MARKETSINVESTORS
34
INVESTOR PROTECTION
NEW KEY INVESTOR PROTECTION ELEMENTS
35
Portfolio Management
• Ban of inducements for portfolio management
Two types of investment advice
• “Independent” advice
• “Non-independent” advice
Reporting to clients
• New definition of cost (incl. transaction cost & performance fee
• Aggregation of all costs at point-of-sale
Product Governance
• Products classified to be sold “execution-only’ have been narrowed down
• Target market assessment (manufacturers and distributors)
Independent advice
• Ban of inducement
• Sufficient number of
financial instruments to be
provided
• Financial instruments
offered must not all be “in-
house”
Non-independent advice
• Inducements still
allowed
• But stricter test of
“quality enhancement”
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT INDUCEMENTS – INVESTMENT
RESEARCH
36
Concerns
How are client commissions being spent?
What constitutes “research”?
Availability of research linked to trading volume?
Insufficient transparency and
accountability, conflicts of interest?
Solutions under MiFID II
Research budgets established up front and agreed with client
Asset managers operate Research Payment Accounts or
pay for research themselves
Commission unbundling, price for research, more
value for clients
37
FINDING FROM “RESTRICTING SALES
INDUCEMENT” REPORT (2014)
38
What are the most important reforms needed to combat mis-selling?
39
In your opinion, what are the main causes of mis-selling?
40
If commission payments by product producers are banned completely, what
consequences, if any, do you see occurring as a result?
41
MARKETS
MARKETS
42
Key topics include:
• Pre- and post- trade transparency in equity and
non-equity markets
• Microstructure issues (HFT, market-making requirements,
order-to-transaction ratios, trading venue fees, tick sizes)
• Data publication and access (consolidated tape,
trade reporting)
TRADE TRANSPARENCY
43
Equity Markets:
• Refinement of pre-trade transparency waivers (recalibration
of applicable size thresholds)
• Double volume cap mechanism to limit dark trading
Non-equity Markets:
• New pre- and post-trade transparency requirements
• Calibration of transparency according to “liquid market”
definition and applicable size thresholds
FIXED INCOME MARKETS
44
• For bonds deemed to be “liquid,” pre-trade transparency
requirements (i.e. publication of bids and offers) apply to
trading on an organised venue
• Waivers from these requirements for:
o Orders “large in scale” (LIS) compared w/ normal mkt size
o Orders held in an order management facility
o Actionable IOIs in RFQ and voice trading systems above
“size specific to the instrument” (SSTI)
o Bonds that do not meet the liquid market definition.
FIXED INCOME MARKETS
45
• On post-trade, details of transactions (i.e. prices and sizes) in
liquid bonds must be disclosed as close to real time as possible
• Deferred publication possible for:
o LIS trades (relating to trading on an organised venue)
o Trades above SSTI (trading on RFQ and voice trading)
Complex Balance between
Transparency and Liquidity
www.cfainstitute.org
www.cfapubs.org
© 2015