Post on 07-Apr-2018
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 1/13
Introduction
This paper analyses the strategies adopted by failed and successful companies. Together
there are 10 cases. The first 5 cases are successful companies followed by 5 cases of failed
companies. For each case, the paper will define the strategy pursued by the company,
specify the company that used it, how the company become successful or failures, and what
the symptoms or outcomes for their success and failures.
1
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 2/13
1. Low Cost Leadership
The low cost strategy is achieved when a firm in an industry become the cost leader as
compared to its rivals. This means the firm can sell its products or services at average
industry prices or even lower than its rivals. The former enables the firm to earn a profit higher than its rival while the latter is practiced when firm intends to gain more market share (Porter
1980).
Wal-Mart uses this strategy. The strategy has transformed Wal-Mart into the world’s largest
retailer. This is achieved by implementing sophisticated technology, adopt a frugal corporate
culture and a corporate mission to reduce price all the times, thus the mission statement
“everyday low prices”
Through technology, Wal-Mart adopted radio frequency identification technology (RFID) to
lower overall operation cost by streamlining the overall value chain. The RFID technology
enables Wal-Mart to possess superb control over its inventory. It helps to track its inventory
real time meaning anytime anywhere.
As the whole supply chain is connected, supplier will be notified automatically whenever stock
level reaches reorder point. Such feature has reduces out of stock situation significantly which
a major issue faced by retailer.
Besides RFID technology, Wal-Mart frugal culture is another success factors and part of its
low cost strategy. Wal-Mart only spends on needs and cut down what deem unnecessary. It’s
headquarter office is located away from expensive city. The building is old and dull.
Executives do not drive limousines and work longer than other. They even share hotel rooms
with employees. The objective is to keep operation cost low so that savings could be passing
on to customers, thus lower retail price. It is estimated that Wal-Mart is able to help shoppers
to save about 15 percent on each cart of groceries (Fishman, 2006).
Last but not least, being the largest retailer in the world bestow Wal-Mart the power to control
its suppliers especially on prices by leading and helping them to become cost efficient. For
example, supplier who wants to supply to Wal-Mart must implement the RFID system. Others
include participating in supplier’s research and development process, such as Coca Cola.
I find Wal-Mart successful in many ways. First, it successfully transforms itself into the world’s
biggest retailer with 2009 revenue more than USD400 billion, about 5.7 times more than
second largest retailer Home Depot. Back. In 2006, it has opened about 6,200 outlets and
employs more than 1.6 million employee (Wilbert, and created 70 percent of all new retail jobs
in United States from 1994 to 2004 (Fishman, 2006).
2
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 3/13
The return of equity (ROE) is compounding at more than 20 percent. This means Wal-Mart is
efficient in utilising shareholders fund, thus its fruitful return. Last but not least, Wal-Mart has
successfully achieved its mission every day low prices.
2. Differentiation Strategy
Porter (1980) defines the strategy where firm has the ability to persuade or make customer
perceive their products and services to be as highly valuable and unique as compared to their
competitors. The strategy of differentiation can be in many forms. It could be an elite or
exclusive brand, new technology, special product or service features, superb customer
services, quality consistency, and many.
Louis Vuitton (LV) uses this strategy to differentiate its products from its peers. To date, LV
has become the world’s largest profitable luxury brand (Matlack, 2002). How does LV do that?
What is it capabilities and strengths? How does LV translate the strategy into actions? Why
people want a piece of it so badly?
LV products are never put on discount nor on sale and you can only purchase the product at
the original own brand stores. This differentiates the product in terms of its value and
exclusivity towards its customers. Such kind of differentiations induces some kind of desire
and emotion towards LV’s customers.
To them, owning LV’s product is about trendy, exclusivity, status, luxurious, possession and
prestigious. Lee (2009) shows the reason customer buy again from LV is to experience the
exclusive feeling. Consequently, overtime coupled with successful advertisings, such
associations create true brand loyalty in customers.
Another key area to its success is the joining of famous French designer, Marc Jacobs as
LV’s creative director. He comes up with creative and innovation product designs that
successfully mix the traditional and modern values of the LV brand. He said it is human
instinct to want to be part of the elite brand that is also highly recognizable (Anonymous,
2009).
Last but not least is the persistent quality of the products. Every product produced goes
through stringent quality test to ensure top quality. This includes resistance to fading test
using ultraviolet rays, zipper durability test by open and shut it by 5000 times, and bracelets
shaking test where a mechanical dummy wears bracelets and shake it strongly to ensure
none of them fall off, and handbag durability testing where a 3.5kg handbag is hang on a
3
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 4/13
robotic dummy arm half a meter from the floor, lift and drop consecutively for four days
(Matlack, 2004).
Its success can be identified by its steady sales growth with profit from USD11.5 billion to
USD17.1 billion in ten years time. The latest financial statements release shows the firmperforms well under both good and bad economic environment, continue to gain market
shares in key markets, achieved double digit growth in revenue and superb profitability,
increase free cash flow and reduce debt by significant percentage (Press Release July 27)
and last but not least, its share price increase by about 20 percent in first half of 2010
(Spencer 2010).
3. New Product Development Strategy
The strategy is defined as to create new products or services to serve existing market in order
to sustain firms bottom-line. This could be an extension of current products or services or an
entire new product or services to serve existing market (Luck 2008).
Kraft Food, the largest manufacturer for food and beverage in US and the world second
largest after Nestle uses this strategy. Kraft uses this strategy to increase its top line growth at
the same time retain and sustain its bottom-line. This is achieved in three ways. First, the firm
improvises on existing products in terms of quality, packaging style or new benefits. Second,
it creates new extension lines of products and develops new products. Third, it acquires newbrands through acquisition.
The key success factors to Kraft success lies in its ability to identify the markets that fits with
new product development, accompany with proper fund allocation and research in those
markets. There are four strategic platforms identified for such purpose. There are convenient
meals, beverages, health and wellness.
Such ability is supported by sound formulation and execution strategy. Strategy formulation
includes defining project’s potential and gathering consumer feedback through research.
Information collected includes consumer acceptance on new product, potential size of the
business, potential sales of the product, and the overall potential of the product.
This will tell Kraft whether the new project fits with overall corporate strategies, its
sustainability, how much time and money will be needed and whether is worthwhile and
efficient to pursue. This initial planning is critical to Kraft as it prevent failure at later stage
which is costly to firm’s resources.
4
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 5/13
One example is the Tombstone Mexican Style Pizza, an extension focused at specific
customer group. Kraft’s consumer research shows young boys love Mexican cuisine and
pizza is their favourite. With this information, a new product is developed based on young
boys in mind couples with notions of convenient and healthy food for parents who perceive
pizza as junk food. The new product was a hit when introduced and has contributedsignificantly to Kraft’s top line as well as bottom-line. Its investment in time and money has
been worthwhile.
Besides that, acquisition is part of its success. Through acquisition, Kraft is able to flood the
marketplace with new products. This happened when Kraft acquires Balance Bar and Boca
Burger. Acquisition can complement and enhance Krafts business as well. For example, Kraft
gains both good brands and products when it acquired Nabisco. Other than that, Kraft also
technology knowledge and expertise from Nabisco which complements Kraft core
technologies (Lori, 2002).
For the past ten years, the firm sales grow from USD22 billion to USD40 billion with profit
(“Kraft Foods Inc: Financial Statement” 2010). For the past three financial years, free cash
flow increased by about 65 percent, dividends per share increased by almost 12 percent, and
earnings per share increased by almost 20 percent (“Kraft Food 2009 Fact Sheet” 2010).
4. Supply Chain Management Strategy
Supply chain strategy is defined as how a supply chain should operate in order to compete
(Happek 2005). It ensures the right product reach the right place at the right time or shortest
possible time in the right quantity as per customer’s need and expectation by developing and
utilizing effective and efficient production and delivery mechanism and processes (Fisher
2002).
Spanish clothing retailer Zara is well known for its ability to design and distribute its product to
its customer market in just 15 days where its competitors take months, thus the term fast
fashion system (Ferdows 2005). This is achieved through effective and efficient supply chain
strategy which serves as Zara’s competitive advantage. Here is how the whole supply chain
works.
At Zara retail store, customer always find new product with limited quantity and very often
sold off if customers are not fast enough. This is a marketing strategy to portray product
exclusiveness by the firm. To support such concept, the firm must be able to replenish stock
in small quantity fast. The firm created 40000 designs a year where 10000 will be marketed
(Ferdows 2005). Hence, information flow along the supply chain is critical. That is why the
5
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 6/13
firm’s structure, operations, office layouts are designed to streamline information flow along
the supply chain.
The firm organisation structure is designed in such a way that design and production facilities
are centralised at headquarters, and are divided into three lines, mainly men, women andchildren. Each line has its own designers, salesman, purchasers, and production planners.
Though is costly to operate this way but it improves the accuracy and speed of information
flow, thus improving the responsiveness of the supply chain.
The firm hired hundreds of young designers in their early twenties who are enthusiastic and
talented only. In terms of office orientation, they sit and work closely with planners, market
specialists and buyer where large tables are located for adhoc meeting; walls are hanged with
latest fashion magazines catalogs, and prototype shop to encourage discussion and feedback
on latest fashion information.
Such close working distance among employees improves the speed and quality of operations
processes, interactions and collaborations. Designer confirms new designs with marketers
who are constantly in talk with store managers retrieving and feeding latest information
regarding fashion designs trends and market pricing. Buyer and planners estimates cost and
production capacity status. Cross functional teams then finalised design and commit
resources needed. All these are achieved in just few hours time (Ferdows, Lewis & Machuca
2005).
Last but not least, Zara uses technology to connect retail stores and headquarter in real time
mode. This means information exchange can be done anytime anywhere. This has minimised
the costly bullwhip effect to traditional retailers. Collaboration among members along the
supply chain is also key to its success.
Zara success includes being the world’s largest fashion retailers after took over American
rival Gap Inc in 2008 (Gammell, 2008) and being the leader in product to market timing of 15
days. In terms of numbers, Zara’s sales, profit, free cash flow and equity fund grew 200
percent for past 6 years (Financial Data 2010).
6
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 7/13
5. Market development strategy
This is a growth strategy where a firm looks for new market to sell its existing product. This
includes exporting product to new market, seek new distribution channel, introduce new
packaging and create new pricing policies to attract different customer groups and marketsegments (Luck 2008).
Procter & Gamble (P&G) uses this strategy to sustain and fuel its future business growth
when she realised is not enough by just relying on internal innovation and costly research and
development (R&D) work, which believed to have reached a stagnated point due to intense
competition, flattening sales, declining earning and stock price (Huston, 2006).
Since then, P&G seeks to develop in emerging markets in developing nations. In 2009, more
than a third of its total sales were derived from developing nations, a steady increase since
2002, where the percentage of sales is only 20 percent of revenue of USD8 billion. This
shows a steady contribution from new markets (“P&G 2009 Annual Report” 2009).
Moving forward, P&G wish to extend presence and grow sales in China and India. The target
is one billion customers by 2014 (Cheng 2010). Over the past 5 years, P&G products have
been doing well in China and Russia, thus P&G will focus to establish more of its products in
this market. The success is due to wide distribution network coverage in China (800 million
people) and Russia (80 percent of population) (P&G Annual Report 2008).
Besides network coverage, the products fit to target market requirements is important too. To
achieve that, P&G must understand target market and its consumer behaviour well, of which it
did. For example, the introduction of Downy Single Rinse in countries where consumers use
limited water to wash clothes.
Understanding consumer spending power on P&G products is important also in estimating
sales. The average spending power for Mexican is USD20, USD3 for Chinese and USD1 for
India. P&G could add 40 billion to its top line if it can match the sales level in China and India
to Mexico.
P&G’s success for the past 10 years, include its ability to grow sales by 100 percent, improve
profit margin from single digit to double digit, improve earnings per share over 200 percent
and share price increase 100 percent .
7
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 8/13
6. Stuck in the middle strategy / vague strategy
According to Porter (1985), a firm which failed to adopt a strategy out of the genericstrategies, mainly focused, differentiation and low cost leadership, is stuck in the middle and
is considered the worst strategic situation a firm can be in. This is so because the firm do not
have clear objectives or direction. Is like a ship without a rudder.
My company is currently in such situation. The company supplies flexible packaging material
to different industry ranging from consumer goods to medical products. The company failed to
do well because it does not have a clear corporate and business strategy. The firm is unable
to tell where to compete, how to compete and what to compete.
Besides, it does not know its strengths and weaknesses as well as the external forces that
shape the industry. No industry analysis, competitor analysis or SWOT analysis are done. All
these are pre-requisites to good strategy formulation processes. Lacking of such knowledge
has created a blurred corporation with blurred culture.
As you have guessed so, such uncertainty has lead to poor execution in everyday activities
and failed to link daily routines to business objectives. This poor execution translates into high
cost of operation. Production cost is often high due to high internal wastage and qualitydeficiency. As a result, delivery to customers is often delayed and goods are often short.
Customers are not satisfied with the service and thus move to other competitors.
Besides, employees are not held accountable or responsible for major mistakes and thus
keep repeating the same costly mistake again and again. No clear goals are set for
employees in different departments. Very often, performance appraisal and incentive system
is not emphasized thus there is no need to outperform oneself. Employees are not motivated,
absenteeism and turnover is high. Weak human resource policies are part of the causes here.
Over time, the firm lost its high volume customers who demand low price to low cost
competitors. It also lost its high margin customers to competitors who are focused on high
margin targets. The lost of sales has make the firm hard to sustain itself financially.
Consequently, the firm freeze its headcount and promotion back in 2008 credit crunch.
The indications of failure are many. The firms’ revenues are declining every year due to
shrinking market share, not making any profit for years; employee motivation is low and high
absenteeism, share price declining over time and shrinking shareholders fund.
8
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 9/13
7. Organisational Restructuring strategy
Ramu (1999) defines this strategy as a strategy that involves changing the firm’s structure for
the purpose to increase its efficiencies and effectiveness, to make it more profitable andbetter organised to fit current business needs.
Due to changing economic and competitive conditions over time, firms with non-differentiated
products are left to compete on price, thus emphasizing the need for low cost strategy. To
avoid this, Sun Microsystems chooses differentiate focus strategy where it produces high
powered and expensive machines in selected market segments than those standard one
offered by its competitors.
The strategy was working well and firm’s sale increased as customers pays a premium on the
products. This does not last long as competitors’ capabilities and market changes. That is
when competitors introduced same products that match its high performance but with cheaper
price. Failed to retaliate and left with no choice, Sun decided to change its strategy from
differentiate focus to low cost focusing on standardised products to compete with its rivals. As
firm structure follows strategy, such change has put Sun into more troubles.
The failure is due to new strategy not supported by the old capabilities, skills and resources,
which favour differentiation strategy for years, and not low cost. Different strategies demandsdifferent capabilities. Attempting to execute a new strategy with old capabilities can only lead
to massive problems.
The indications of failure are decline in sales when customer switched to competitors cheaper
products offerings, thus losing market share and affecting top line and bottom-line. Its shares
price headed south tremendously to USD3.50 from a high of USD65 in 2000 (Hrebeniak
2005).
In 2008, in order sustain its business, the firm restructured further to reduce operating cost by
retrenching 18 percent (6000 workers) of its global workforce (Rogers 2008). But to no avail,
the firm was completed acquired by Oracle early 2010 (SHankland 2010).
9
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 10/13
8. Merger
Merger is defined as joining of two or more firms after they have come under common
ownership (Lajoux 2006).
Both Daimler and Chrysler use this strategy thus formed DaimlerChrysler. The purpose of
such merger strategy is to tap on each other strengths to create competitive advantage to
compete globally by introducing a new series of small cars to the emerging classes. Chrysler
will use Daimler’s Mercedes technology while Daimler could use Chryslers as hedging
platform when the luxury car market segment deteriorates. It was believed the merger breed
synergies and cost savings but this was not the case (Welch, 2005).
The merger failed due to poor planning and poor execution which leads to poor merger
results. Inadequate due diligence is a critical aspect in DaimlerChrysler merger planning. This
include cultural due diligence which is vital to the merger success. This is the soft matters
related to culture similarities and differences between merger partners such as people,
culture, values, and this is where DaimlerChrysler merger failed to carried out.
The cultural differences between the German and American firms were vast. For example, the
merger failed to integrate its operation and management successfully due to difference in
management style. Daimler’s management style is structured, formal, centralised and
dominant while Chrysler was flexible, informal, decentralised, and non-authoritarian.
On top of that, there were different views on compensation schedules that caused serious
cultural and perceived equity problems. The style and process differences have made the
cultural integration difficult. As a result, the merger faced poor performance, high employee
dissatisfaction and high employee turnover (Ojha 2008).
Failed merger is often costly. In this case, the merger was formed with value USD36 billion in
1998. In 2006, Chrysler posted operating loss of USD1.5 billion and dropped to rank four in
the car market behind Toyota. In 2007, Chrysler restructured by cutting off 16 percent (13,000
workers) of its global workforce. The same year, Daimler put it on sale options and sold it for
USD7.4 billion. In 2009, Chrysler seeks for bankruptcy protection (Daimler AG 2010).
10
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 11/13
9. Distribution strategy
This strategy defines how to get a product upon creation to the right place, to the right person,
at the right time in an efficient and effective approach. The objective is to minimize the overall
distribution cost, select the best target markets and suitable channels for each marketdepending on the product characteristics (Harper 2003).
Apple practices such strategy in 1990s. Apple revamps its distribution strategy by selling
direct to computer reseller (with sales threshold conditions) and bypassing the firm’s
distributors. The objective is to save the additional mark-up added at distributors’ level. This
means the resellers were able to reap a discount by buying direct from Apple than they
bought through distribution channel. Not only did the revamp failed to meet its objectives, it
turns out to be a disaster.
The reason behind the failure is that Apple does not have the system to handle direct sales
operations at that time. Resellers failed to receive goods from Apple as lower priority was
given to them because they are buying less than distributors and larger superstores. But the
resellers are preferred customers to the distributors.
There were no proper logistics systems to track new incoming direct customers as well as
those who leave the program. Worst still, there were no additional sales force cater to handle
problems arises and to settle dispute between resellers and Apple. The firm’s largestdistributor said the problem arises when Apple sells more in the direct channel than the
distribution channel. As such, the Apple incapability in handling distribution complexities has
led to destroy its own channel. Less than two years, the distributor sales plummeted by 75
percent (Kanellos 1997)
From the case, the failure is purely a result of a weak strategy in both formulation and
execution. This is because Apple lack of understanding of its current operations and have not
discussed or analyze the kind of impacts the revamp could have on the value chain with the
value chain members, in this case, the distributors the resellers or dealers.
Such poor planning and execution comes with great cost. The negative results for such
revamp include sales loss to Apple as resellers could not get products. Consequently, to fulfil
customers’ orders, resellers were forced to buy from superstores thus setoff the cost savings
they should have through direct channel. Distributors lost millions of sales and promotion
commission. All these add up to be total loss for Apple. Besides numbers, the program
caused hostile arguments with distributors, thus damaging years of good relationship.
11
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 12/13
10. International Strategy
International strategy is a strategy where firms used to acquire growth value by bringing home
products and services to foreign markets where these products and services do not exist
(Kozami 2002). With the strategy, overseas production is controlled by firm and productoffered are standardised with little differentiation.
In 1990s, Kellogg’s experienced declining growth in the cereal industry in its two major US
and European markets. As a result, Kellogg’s look outside these markets to look for cereal
consumers and had selected India due to its huge population. The India market is so big that
a mere 2 percent market share is greater than US market. As such, Kellogg’s invested
millions of dollars to launch its signature product (Haig 2003).
Unfortunately, the results were not as rosy as Kellogg’s expected. First obstacles is cereal
breakfast is new to Indian and they favoured hot vegetables for breakfast. So, the debut sales
were acceptable but not at later point. The second issue is product was expensive. Kellogg’s
not lowering the price at the same time introduce more products without engage in further
market research. The outcome was none of them were sellable. Kellogg’s tried to blend the
products with Indian flavour but turn out disastrous. Kellogg’s re-strategise and sells biscuit.
The causes for failure were Kellogg’s lack of market research towards India and blinded by its
population. Even though the population is huge only a fraction of it was middle class.Kellogg’s later find out affordable consumer segment accounted for 100 million only and their
buying behaviour varies significantly across the regions. Others include speaking many types
of languages and believe in many religions throughout the states. This leads to the cause of
failure, that is do not understand Indian culture. So, only companies who know the cultural
complexities will be able to do and get business in India.
Such poor strategy formulation and execution has led Kellogg’s wasted millions of dollar of
invested, time and effort. Besides, the worst dilemma is whether its brand would be associate
d more with biscuit than cereal by the Indians, thus spoiling its brand identity there.
12
8/6/2019 MGT510 ASS1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mgt510-ass1 13/13
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is essential to note that strategy formulation is not an easy task and strategy
execution is much more difficult.
From the cases discussed above, the successful ones clearly demonstrate certain key
success factors. They are clear with their business strategies and able to align its core
competence to strategies, and execute it smoothly.
Whereas for those failed cases, most of them failed because they have poor planning, failed
to manage cultural clashes or manage change, do not have proper strategy formulation which
leads to poor execution and poor results.
Different companies can adopt same strategies but each may get different results. Very often,
the success and failures of a company lies in its strength and weaknesses and not a bad
strategy but only bad execution.
13