Measuring Respondent Burden to Statistical SurveysJohn-Mark Frost, Sarah Green, Jacqui Jones & Denise Williams

UK Office for National Statistics

Aim of Presentation

• To provide an overview of the:

- Drivers for the UK pilot of using the Standard Cost Model to measure respondent burden from statistical surveys

- Issues highlighted by this work

Overview of Presentation

• Measuring respondent burden from statistical surveys - Drivers- Measurement

• Standard Cost Model for measuring respondent burden from statistical surveys- Drivers- Measurement- Pilot - Issues

• The way forward

Drivers for Measuring Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

Prime Ministers’ Instructions on the Control of Statistical Surveys

UK Code of Practice for Official Statistics

Report annually the estimated costs (for example, on businesses, service providers, or the public) of responding to statistical surveys …

PMIs

Code

of

Practice

Measurement of Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

Simple method: - used during survey control reviews - 20% of survey sample - postal self-completion questionnaire

Calculated by:(No. of questionnaires (100% response)) * (estimated completion time) *(appropriate hourly rate)+Up-rating for respondent re-contact

Recognised weakness in method:“questionnaire did not adequately capture all activities involved in complying with the regulation”

PMIs

Code

of

Practice

Measurement

SCM to Measure Total Respondent Burden in Europe

Statistics Netherlands Standard Cost Model- European approach to measure administrative burdens for all government information requests - Including survey participation

Standard Cost Model approach: - Highlights impact of international legislation - Transparent measurement - Measures administrative burden - Data collected in face-to-face interviews

PMIs

Code

of

Practice

Measurement

SCM

SCM to Measure Total Respondent Burden in the UK

Administrative Burden Reduction Project - Total UK administrative burden - Includes survey participation - Burden associated with statistical surveys forms only a small part of the total - Use SCM

PM’s

Code

of

Practice

Measurement

SCM ABRP

Drivers for Measuring Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

Need to change method

Need consistency

= Use SCM

PM’s

Code

of

Practice

Measurement

SCM ABRP

!

Introduction of the SCM to Measure Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

• ABRP used face-to-face interviews with very small sample sizes- Not feasible or robust enough for measuring compliance on

a regular basis

• A paper-based version of the SCM developed to measure costs of complying with statistical surveys- Implement quantitative rather than qualitative approach

• The paper-based version was piloted in ONS

SCM to Measure Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

• Questionnaire developed- 10 questions- Breakdown of responding activity- Information available from ‘business-as-usual’- External costs- Survey irritants

- For example: unclear definitions or available information did not match information requested

• Standard Cost Model formula:mean weighted cost per questionnaire + re-contact uplift

*number of questionnaires in survey sample *survey frequency

Pilot for Measuring Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys Using the SCM

• Pilot highlighted large differences in estimates when compared to:- Face-to-face interview methodology- Previous ONS methodology

• Differences to previous ONS methodology are driven by:- Different information in models- Change in pay rates- Different uplifts for overheads- Adjustment to internal costs for business-as-usual

Issues with the SCM for Measuring Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

• Figures surrounded by confidence intervals of the same magnitude as previous methodology

• Method is hugely resource intensive- Respondents- Data producers

• Difficulties in estimating accurately- Breakdown of activities- Associating costs with respondents

Questions Raised from Pilot Results

• Statistical surveys form only small fraction of total administrative burden - Does measurement need to be consistent?

• Are such resource costs beneficial?- The figures are purely estimates

• Would a simpler method be:- Fit-for-purpose?- As robust?

Way Forward for Measuring Respondent Burden from Statistical Surveys

• Recommendation to use a simpler model:- More proportionate- Is concerned with consistently measuring change

over time rather than accurate levels

• ONS has worked with producers of UK official statistics to develop such a model- Currently proposals are being finalised to take to

the National Statistician for approval

Thank you

John-Mark.Frost@ons.gov.uk