Post on 04-Apr-2018
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
1/154
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;
MARVELL INTERNATIONAL LTD.;MARVELL WORLD TRADE LTD.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-_________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiffs Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Marvell International Ltd., and Marvell World
Trade Ltd. (together, Marvell ) hereby file this Complaint against Defendant Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc. ( Freescale ) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,903,448 (the 448
Patent ); 7,216,276 (the 276(I) Patent ); 7,379,718 B2 (the 718 Patent ); 7,444,571 (the
571 Patent); 7,496,818 (the 818 Patent ); 7,562, 276 (the 276(II) Patent ); and 7,573,249
B2 (the 249 P atent) (collectively, Patents-In-Suit ).
PARTIES
1. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. is a California Corporation with its principal place
of business at 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, California 95054.
2. Marvell International Ltd. is a Bermuda Corporation with its principal place of
business at Canon's Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda.
3. Marvell World Trade Ltd. is a Barbados Corporation with its principal place of
business at LHori zon, Gunsite Road, Brittons Hill, BB14027, St. Michael, Barbados.
5
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
2/154
2
4. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a corporation organized under the
laws of Delaware, and maintains its principal place of business at 6501 William Cannon Drive
West, Austin, Texas 78721.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This lawsuit is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of
the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1, et seq . This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.
6. Upon information and belief, Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in
this Court because it does and has done substantial business in this judicial district, including:(i) maintaining its principal place of business in this judicial district; (ii) employing numerous
employees in this judicial district; (iii) designating an agent for service of process in this
judicial district; (iv) regularly receiving shipments of infringing display devices within this
judicial district; (v) committing acts of patent infringement and/or contributing to or inducing
acts of patent infringement by others in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas and the
United States; and (vi) regularly doing business or soliciting business, engaging in other
persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from products and/or
services provided to individuals in this judicial district and in this State.
7. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and
1400(b) because Defendant regularly conducts business in this judicial district, has regular and
established places of business in this judicial district, and/or because certain of the acts
complained of herein occurred in this judicial district.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
3/154
3
U.S. PATENT NO. 6,903,448
8. On June 7, 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 448 Patent, High Performance Leadframe in Electronic Package, to Sehat
Sutardja, Vincent Kao, and Hendrick Santo. A true and correct copy of the 448 Patent is
attached as Exhibit 1.
9. Marvell International Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 448 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 448 Patent,
including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
10.
The 448 Patent is valid and enforceable.U.S. PATENT NO. 7,216,276
11. On May 8, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 276(I) Patent, Apparatus and Method for Testing and Debugging an
Integrated Circuit, to Saeed Azimi and Son Ho. A true and correct copy of the 276(I) Patent
is attached as Exhibit 2.
12. Marvell International Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 276(I) Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 276(I)
Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
13. The 276(I) Patent is valid and enforceable.
U.S. PATENT NO. 7,379,718 B2
14. On May 27, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 718 P atent, Method and Apparatus to Manage Power Consumption of a
Semiconductor Device , to Amit Dor, Charles Roth, and Mark Fullerton. A true and correct
copy of the 718 Patent is attached as Exhibit 3.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
4/154
4
15. Marvell World Trade Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 718 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 718 Patent,
including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
16. The 718 Patent is valid and enforceable.
U.S. PATENT NO. 7,444,571
17. On October 28, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 571 Patent, Apparatus and Method for Testing and Debugging an
Integrated Circuit, to Saeed Azimi, Son Ho, and Daniel Smathers. A true and correct copy of
the 571 Patent is attached as Exhibit 4.18. Marvell International Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 571 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 571Patent,
including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
19. The 57 1 Patent is valid and enforceable.
U.S. PATENT NO. 7,496,818
20. On February 24, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 818 Patent, Apparatus and Method for Testing and Debugging an
Integrated Circuit, to Saeed Azimi, Son Ho, and Daniel Smathers. A true and correct copy of
the 818 Patent is attached as Exhibit 5.
21. Marvell International Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 818 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 818 Patent,
including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
22. The 818 Patent is valid and enforceable.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
5/154
5
U.S. PATENT NO. 7,562,276
23. On July 14, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 276(II) P atent, Apparatus and Method for Testing and Debugging an
Integrated Circuit , to Saeed Azimi and Son Ho. A true and correct copy of the 276(II) Patent
is attached as Exhibit 6.
24. Marvell International Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 276(II) Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 276(II)
Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
25.
The 276(II) Patent is valid and enforceable.U.S. PATENT NO. 7,573,249 B2
26. On August 11, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
legally issued the 249 Patent, Power Array System and Method, to Sehat Sutardja,
Runsheng He, and Jiancheng Zhang. A t rue and correct copy of the 249 Patent is attached as
Exhibit 7.
27. Marvell World Trade Ltd. is the sole owner and assignee of all right, title, and
interest in and to the 249 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the 249 Patent,
including the right to recover damages for past infringements.
28. The 249 Patent is valid and enforceable.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
29. Marvell re-alleges and incorporates herein the allegations of the preceding
paragraphs of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
30. Upon information and belief, Defendant makes, uses, sells, and offers to sell
within the United States, and/or imports into the United States one or more products, including
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
6/154
6
but not limited to certain integrated circuits and/or chipsets that practice each of the elements
of one or more claims of the Patents-In-Suit, without license from Marvell, in the Western
District of Texas and throughout the United States. Examples of those integrated circuits
and/or chipsets include but are not limited to the Freescale MC34671, MC34672, MC34673,
MC34674, MC34675, MC34676, MC34700, MC34704, MC34712, MC34713, MC34716,
MC34717, MC34727, MC34848, MC34933, MCIMX233, MCIMX251, MCIMX253,
MCIMX255, MCIMX257, MCIMX258, MCIMX27, MCIMX31, MCIMX35, MCIMX351,
MCIMX353, MCIMX355, MCIMX356, MCIMX357, P4040, P4080, and Kinetis family.
Marvell reserves its right to contend that additional Freescale products infringe the Patents-In-Suit.
31. In addition, Freescale indirectly infringes the Patents-In-Suit. Freescale
contributorily infringes by selling or using its integrated circuits and/or chipsets, including
those identified above, to distributors, consumers, and end-users to directly infringe the
Patents-in-Suit by selling or using the Freescale integrated circuits and/or chipsets. Freescales
marketing, sales, and customer support materials, which it makes publicly-available, describe
and direct customers to use infringing features of its integrated circuits and/or chipsets in an
infringing manner. For example, Freescales website provides customers and potential
customers with product data sheets, technical papers and other marketing materials for
Freescales integrated circuits and/or chipsets that tout their infringing features and direct
customers to use them in an infringing manner. On information and belief, Freescale also
provides verbal and written instructions, including sales support and technical know-how, to its
distributors and customers that intentionally aid, assist, and encourage infringement.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
7/154
7
32. Freescales integrated circuits and/or chipsets , which it sells directly to
consumers, assemblers as well as through its distribution partners, are designed to be used (and
are used by said distributors, assemblers, consumers, and end-users) in an infringing manner.
Additionally, on information and belief, Freescales integrated circuits and/or chipsets were
especially designed, made, or adapted for use in an infringing manner. Freescales integrated
circuits and/or chipsets either embody the claimed inventions on their own or are material,
non-staple components of end-user products which embody the claimed inventions, which
components have no substantial non-infringing uses.
33.
Defendant's continuing acts of infringement are irreparably harming andcausing damage to Marvell. Marvell has no adequate remedy at law to redress Defendant's
continuing acts of infringement. The hardships that would be imposed upon Defendant by an
injunction are less than those faced by Marvell should an injunction not issue. Furthermore,
the public interest would be served by issuance of an injunction.
34. Upon information and belief, Defendant has knowledge of the Patents-In-Suit,
at least since service of this Complaint, and has not ceased its infringing activities in light of
such knowledge.
Count One Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,903,448
35. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 34 as if fully set
forth herein.
36. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 448 Patent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
8/154
8
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of the 448 Patent, in that
they are designed with lead frame packaging technology, including extended leads that are
useful for multiple wire bonding and improved thermal and/or electrical properties output
regulation and dynamic voltage management.
37. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
38. Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvell
irreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
39. Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of
the 448 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial.
Count Two Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,216,276
40. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 39 as if fully set
forth herein.
41. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 276(I) Patent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
9/154
9
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of the 276(I) Patent, in
that they are designed with a serial/deserializer (SERDES) interface which is used for testing
and/or debugging.
42. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of
equivalents.
43.
Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvellirreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
44. Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of
the 276(I) Patent in an amount to be determined at trial.
Count Three Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,379,718 B2
45. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 44 as if fully set
forth herein.
46. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 718 P atent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
10/154
10
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of the 718 Patent, in that
they are designed with power management features intended to provide high performance
processing while minimizing power consumption, including the digital control of output
regulation and dynamic voltage management.
47. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of
equivalents.
48. Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvell
irreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringingactivities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
49. Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of
the 718 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial.
Count Four Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,444,571
50. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 49 as if fully set
forth herein.
51. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 571 P atent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of the 571 Patent, in that
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
11/154
11
they are designed with a serial/deserializer (SERDES) interface which is used for testing
and/or debugging.
52. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of
equivalents.
53. Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvell
irreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
54.
Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of the 571 P atent in an amount to be determined at trial.
Count Five Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,496,818
55. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully set
forth herein.
56. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 818 P atent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of th e 818 Patent, in that
they are designed with a serial/deserializer (SERDES) interface which is used for testing
and/or debugging.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
12/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
13/154
13
62. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of
equivalents.
63. Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvell
irreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
64. Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of
the 276(II) P atent in an amount to be determined at trial.
Count Seven
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,249 B265. This count incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 64 as if fully set
forth herein.
66. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe,
has contributed to and continues to contribute to acts of infringement of the 249 P atent by
making, using, offering for sale and selling in the United States, and by importing into the
Western District of Texas and throughout the United States without authority, and/or by
causing others to make, use, offer for sale and sell in the United States, and import into the
Western District of Texas and throughout United States without authority, integrated circuits
and/or chipsets, for example the ones identified in paragraph 30. These integrated circuits
and/or chipsets practice each of the elements of one or more claims of the 249 Patent, in that
they are designed with power management features intended to provide high performance
processing while minimizing power consumption, including the digital control of output
regulation and dynamic voltage management.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
14/154
14
67. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and contributory
infringement is literal infringement or, in the alternative, infringement under the doctrine of
equivalents.
68. Defendants infringing activities have caused and will continue to cause Marvell
irreparable harm, for which it has no adequate remedy at law, unless Freescales infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283.
69. Marvell has been and continues to be damaged by Freescales infringement of
the 249 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial.
REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL70. Marvell requests a jury trial of all issues in this action so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Marvell prays for the following relief:
(a) That Defendant be ordered to pay damages adequate to compensate
Marvell for Defendant's infringement of each of the Patents-In-Suit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;
(b) That Defendant be ordered to pay attorneys fees pursuant to 3 5 U.S.C.
285 for each of the Patents-In-Suit;
(c) That Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and those
persons acting in active concert or in participation with them be enjoined from further
infringement of each of the Patents-In-Suit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283;
(d) That Defendant be ordered to pay prejudgment interest;
(e) That Defendant be ordered to pay all costs associated with this action; and(f) That Marvell be granted such other and additional relief as the Court
deems just and proper.
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
15/154
15
Dated: January 4, 2013 Respectfully submitted:
By: /s/ B. Russell Horton
B. Russell HortonState Bar No. 10014450GEORGE BROTHERS KINCAID & HORTON, L.L.P.114 W. 7 th Street, Suite 1100Austin, Texas 78701(512) 495-1400(512) 499-0094 facsimile Email: rhorton@gbkh.com
Kevin P.B. Johnson (to be admitted pro hac vice )QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,LLP555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560Redwood Shores, California 94065Telephone:(650) 801-5000Facsimile: (650) 801-5100E-mail: kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Sean S. Pak (to be admitted pro hac vice )Peter A. Klivans (to be admitted pro hac vice )James D. Judah (to be admitted pro hac vice)QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,LLP50 California Street, 22 nd FloorSan Francisco, California 94111Telephone:(415) 875-6600Facsimile: (415) 875-6700E-mail: seanpak@quinnemanuel.com E-mail: jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS MARVELLSEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MARVELLINTERNATIONAL LTD., AND MARVELLWORLD TRADE LTD.
mailto:rhorton@gbkh.commailto:rhorton@gbkh.commailto:kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.commailto:kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.commailto:seanpak@quinnemanuel.commailto:seanpak@quinnemanuel.commailto:jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.commailto:jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.commailto:jamesjudah@quinnemanuel.commailto:seanpak@quinnemanuel.commailto:kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.commailto:rhorton@gbkh.com7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
16/154
EXHIBIT 1
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
17/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
18/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
19/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
20/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
21/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
22/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
23/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
24/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
25/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
26/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
27/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
28/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
29/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
30/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
31/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
32/154
EXHIBIT 2
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
33/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
34/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
35/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
36/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
37/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
38/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
39/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
40/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
41/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
42/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
43/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
44/154
EXHIBIT 3
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
45/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
46/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
47/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
48/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
49/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
50/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
51/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
52/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
53/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
54/154
EXHIBIT 4
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
55/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
56/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
57/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
58/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
59/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
60/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
61/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
62/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
63/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
64/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
65/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
66/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
67/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
68/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
69/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
70/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
71/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
72/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
73/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
74/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
75/154
EXHIBIT 5
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
76/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
77/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
78/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
79/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
80/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
81/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
82/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
83/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
84/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
85/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
86/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
87/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
88/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
89/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
90/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
91/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
92/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
93/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
94/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
95/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
96/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
97/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
98/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
99/154
EXHIBIT 6
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
100/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
101/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
102/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
103/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
104/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
105/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
106/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
107/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
108/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
109/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
110/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
111/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
112/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
113/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
114/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
115/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
116/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
117/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
118/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
119/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
120/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
121/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
122/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
123/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
124/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
125/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
126/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
127/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
128/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
129/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
130/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
131/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
132/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
133/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
134/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
135/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
136/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
137/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
138/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
139/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
140/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
141/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
142/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
143/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
144/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
145/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
146/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
147/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
148/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
149/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
150/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
151/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
152/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
153/154
7/30/2019 Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
154/154