Post on 01-Apr-2018
Una ricerca interdisciplinare
• Irrilevanza dei SSD
• Management and Accounting- accounting history- strategia in prospettiva storica- ma anche mktg history? etc.
• Contatti con storici diversi: - storici di business- storici economici- paesi/mondi diversi
Storia: pensiero o pratiche?
• history of thought- evolution of management and accounting thought- “histories of accounting histories”- lack of historicity in mngt research/literatures
But even more interesting/intriguing:
• history of practices- mngt & accounting as an “old issue”- before industrial revolution- back to the renaissance
Main focus (so far): Venice Arsenal, 1580-1640
WHY caring for history• Several reasons.
One in particular:theory falsification
• History as“extreme management”:
what’s left of management- as we know it / teach it -when usingtime anomalies
Bringing in in the tool-kit:the debate on decision-making
Current/future research
Implications for the Great Divergence debate:
• from a micro focus
• e.g. comparing Venice/Ottoman Arsenalse.g. comparing Venice with earlier Chinese contextse.g. the Jesuit in knowledge transfer from W to E (with Rebecca?)….
• Management & accounting history in broaderintellectual debates
An international research network
International network:
• EIASM series
• co-authorships: S. Carmona, GSB, Spain;M. Martini, Université Paris Diderot, Paris;F. Rossi, Archivio di Stato, Venezia;S. Zambon, Università di Ferrara;Q. Xue, Nanjin University)
• joint research: Bulent Ari, Dolmabahce Palace, Istanbul;Kent Deng, LSE, London;Qingmei Xue, Nanjin University