MAHWASH SAEED, JACQUES RIZKALLAH, MEGAN JACK, LEIGH ANNE SHAFER, JAMES TAM Non Invasive Bedside...

Post on 01-Jan-2016

217 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of MAHWASH SAEED, JACQUES RIZKALLAH, MEGAN JACK, LEIGH ANNE SHAFER, JAMES TAM Non Invasive Bedside...

Mahwash Saeed, Jacques Rizkallah, Megan Jack, Leigh Anne Shafer, James Tam

Non Invasive Bedside Assessment of Right Atrial Pressure;

Scanning into the Future

disclosures

• None.

Right Atrial Pressure

• Noninvasive bedside physical examination of volume status is a common clinical skill taught to medical students early in their training

• Right atrial pressure (RAP) is used as a surrogate for central venous pressure and overall volume status

RAP: Evaluation

• Noninvasive evaluation of RAP can be achieved by the following techniques:

• Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP)

• Peripheral Venous Collapse (PVC)

• Ultrasound visualization of the inferior vena cava (IVC)

JVP: Limitations

• The JVP examination is a practical clinical tool, however it can be very difficult to assess in certain individuals

• obesity • anomalous venous anatomy• connective tissue diseases• venous scarring from catheter insertion

• In such patients, alternative methods may be helpful, although not systematically validated

RAP Estimation: Alternative Techniques

•PVC, IVC collapse

• The relative accuracy of these techniques, compared to one another, and their application by trainees of varying experience remains uncertain

Objectives

• We compared the utility of the JVP, PVC, and bedside mini echo (BME) as non-invasive RAP clinical predictive tools amongst trainees of varying experience

Methods

• A 2nd year medical student, 2nd year medical resident, and 2nd year cardiology fellow examined patients presenting for outpatient and inpatient echocardiogram at a tertiary care hospital

Methods

• Inclusion Criteria

• Patients receiving scheduled echo at St Boniface Hospital in Winnipeg, MB

• Patient able to give informed consent

Methods

• Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with intravenous catheters (IV) or recent IV insertions within the last 2 weeks in the right arm or neck veins

• Patients with a history of intravenous drug use

• Patients who could not give informed consent, including those with language barrier

Methods

• Patients were examined for JVP and PVC by all three examiners

• BME (without JVP/PVC) was utilized (after 10 hours of instruction) by the student in another group of patients

• Bedside RAP estimates were then compared to measurements from a complete echo study by a trained sonographer read by a level 3 echocardiologist

JVP

Peripheral Vein Collapse

Anthem Sign

BEDSIDE MINI ECHO

Methods

• All patients underwent their regularly scheduled two dimensional echocardiographic examination

• The echo technologist and staff echocardiographer interpreting the study were not involved in the clinical assessment of the patients

• Assessment of the IVC by the echocardiographer was used as the gold standard for RAP estimates

Overall Patient Characteristics

Overall Patient Characteristics

SENSITIVITY OF PHYSICAL EXAM TECHNIQUES

Examiner 1

MED STUDEN

T(N= 217)

Examiner 2

MED RESIDEN

T(N= 58)

Examiner 3

CARDIO FELLOW(N= 49)

Examiner 1

BME

(N= 43)

P-Value

Sensitivity for detecting

increased CVP

JVP

PVCAnthem Sign

BME

13%

15%21%

n/a

53%

8%15%

n/a

86%

50%38%

n/a

n/a

n/an/a

100%

<0.01

0.020.35

n/a

PPV and NPV of Specific Exam Techniques

Examiner 1

MED STUDENT(N= 217

Examiner 2

MED RESIDEN

T(N= 58)

Examiner 3

CARDIO FELLOW(N= 49)

Examiner 1

BME

(N= 43)

PPV

JVPPVC

AnthemBME

39%35%39%n/a

47%25%29%n/a

44%38%50%n/a

n/an/an/a40%

NPV

JVPPVC

AnthemBME

75%73%74%n/a

75%71%72%n/a

91%80%78%n/a

n/an/an/a100%

PPV and NPV of Specific Exam Techniques in Obese Patients (BMI >30)

Results

• Of the physical exam maneuvers for detecting elevated RAP, the JVP was the most sensitive at 86%

• This improved with clinical experience

Results

• The PVC/anthem sign more useful for the early learner who has not mastered the JVP yet

• There was consistency in the sensitivity of the anthem sign which hints towards ease of use and reproducibility

Results

• The BME showed 100% sensitivity for detecting increased RAP

Conclusions

•The JVP was the most sensitive physical exam technique

•There may be an adjunctive role for the PVC and Anthem sign

• Helpful for early learner and in obese patients

Conclusions

• BME estimate of CVP is at least comparable to physical examination assessment and may require less instruction

• The use of BME in medical training should be further evaluated and encouraged

SCANNING INTO THE FUTURE…

Acknowledgements

St Boniface Echo staff

Photo models:• Rosalie Grant• Dr Anjala Chelvanathan• Dr Ali Bagherli• D Shelley Zieroth

Acknowledgements

• Dr Jacques Rizkallah• Dr James Tam• Megan Jack