Logistics observatory for Chile

Jari Kauppila, Head of Statistics and ModellingEL NUEVO ESCENARIO DEL SECTOR MARÍTIMO – PORTUARIO NACIONAL , Santiago, 12 April 2016

Intergovernmental Organisation

� 57 member countries (23 non-OECD) focussing on transport

� A strategic think tank for global transport policy issues

� An annual summit of Ministers

3

International review team

• Mr Pablo Guerrero: Inter-American Development Bank

• Alan McKinnon: Kuehne Logistics University

• Mr Willem Heeren: Dinalog, Netherlands

• Mr Gordon Wilmsmeier: UN ECLAC

• Workshop with national logistics experts:

• Moderated by Mario Waissbluth and attended by Pedro Ruz, Gabriel Aldoney, Julio Villalobos, Mauricio Paredes, RaimundoVeloso, Octavio Doerr, Sabah Zrari, Ricardo Subiabre, Pablo Manterola, Alexis Michea, Mabel Leva, Mauricio Casanova,

50%Bestperformers

Improving border administration and transport infrastructure

Importance of logistics performance

50%Bestperformers

Improving border administration and transport infrastructure

Importance of logistics performance

+5% of increase in global GDP

x6Complete worldwide tariff elimination

High logistics costs affect Chile’s ability to integrate into global supply chains

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Arg

entin

a (2

004)

Bra

zil (

2004

)

Col

ombi

a (2

004)

Mor

occo

(20

05)

Mex

ico

(200

4)

Tha

iland

(20

08)

Chi

na (

2007

)

Chi

le (

2004

)

Chi

na (

2009

)

Nor

way

(20

07)

Bal

tic r

egio

n (2

006)

Sou

th-A

fric

a (2

010)

Kor

ea (

2007

)

Fin

land

(20

09)

Sw

eden

(20

05)

US

A (

2004

)

OE

CD

(20

04)

Japa

n (2

007)

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

(201

0)

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

(200

8)

Net

herla

nds

(200

8)

Eur

ope

(200

7)

Sw

itzer

land

(20

09)

Eur

ope

(200

8)

Source: ITF, 2012

Logistics costs as a

percentage of GDP

How does Chile perform? WB LPI 2014

74% 76% 74%

67%

73% 75% 73%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%World

Overall score Efficiency of customs

InfrastructureEase of

arranging shipments

Quality and competence of services

Ability to track and

trace

Timeliness of deliveries

How does Chile perform? WB LPI 2014

23%

32%28%

15% 18%

29%

18%

74% 76% 74%

67%

73% 75% 73%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%EU World

Overall score Efficiency of customs

InfrastructureEase of

arranging shipments

Quality and competence of services

Ability to track and

trace

Timeliness of deliveries

How does Chile perform? WB LPI 2014

9%

15%12%

9% 6%

15%12%

23%

32%28%

15% 18%

29%

18%

74% 76% 74%

67%

73% 75% 73%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%OECD EU World

Overall score Efficiency of customs

InfrastructureEase of

arranging shipments

Quality and competence of services

Ability to track and

trace

Timeliness of deliveries

Quality of logistics

services

Timeliness Tracking and tracing

Customs Infrastructure Ease of arrangingshipments

Policy Actions

Indicators, analysisforecasts

National strategies need to be supported by KPIs

Significant data gap in Chile

Source: ITF Stats

Chilean official source

Inland freight in million tonne-km

25,48125,48125,48125,481

35,82735,82735,82735,82739,00039,00039,00039,000

S.I.I (2008) Road transport annual

report. INE 2010.

Central Bank report (2003)

+41%

+9%

Number of road freight transport companies

Activity in one of the Chilean ports in 2014 [tonnes]

871 438

2390 4032185 529

Directemar Empresa Portuaria SEP

Key data requirements

15

Logistics observatory a key to bridge this gap

• A clear mandate;

• A clear policy connection (what are we doing, indicators linked to actionable policies);

• Strong commitment both from public and private side (ownership of the exercise);

• Regular feedback on indicators and their usefulness (with periodical reviews of them); and

• Sustainability (need a well defined business plan);

Logistics observatory: Key objectives

• Collect and disseminate high-quality data on Chilean logistics

• Produce analysis on key issues related to logistics in Chile

• Build dialogue between public and private sector

• Raise awareness of logistics sector

Proposed governance structure of the observatory

Establish a logistics

observatory immediately

To strengthen decision-making, help create trust in data and analysis and to promote dialogue

Helps sector to develop a strong logistics strategy

MTT takes leadership in

implementation

step-by-step

Strong governance and leadership, good technical capability are critical

Build on existing data collection and structures in-house at MTT

Step-by step approach

A centre of excellence

Robust statistical methods

High level logistics analysis and research

A hub for logistics dialogue in Chile

Commitment from both public and private sector

Clear mandate has to be given

Helps to build common goals and deliver expected benefits

Financial support is vital

ITF/OECD review team recommendations