Krg bod pod february2014

Post on 29-Nov-2014

330 views 0 download

description

Bod Pod description Data analysis

Transcript of Krg bod pod february2014

Bod PodDoes beverage consumption affect results?

Sophia Fong, Megan Magiera, Dinh Nguyen, Shawn Rigdon

IntroductionBody composition testing

•the 2-compartment modelo fat mass = 0.9 grams per cm3

o fat-free mass = 1.10 grams per cm3

•Siri equation:%fat = (495/density) - 450

How does the Bod Pod work?

● Air Displacement Plethysmograph (ADP)○ Density= Mass/Volume○ Weigh subject → mass○ Volume-Pressure changes

in chamber → measure pressure → derive subject volume● Must account for:

○ Average thoracic lung volume○ effect of skin surface area

Image from:http://floridafitnesstesting.com/index.php/qaa.html

Recommended Protocol

● No food or drink within 2 hours of testing

● No vigorous exercise within 2 hours of testing

● Appropriate attire should be as close to bare skin as possible○ Wear swim cap○ Form-fitting swimsuit○ Compression shorts○ Unpadded sports bra○ Remove all other clothing, jewelry, etc.

Hypothesis

• We expected body % fat, volume, and mass to increase while density to decrease due to body absorption of 32 ounces of Gatorade.

Methods• 6 Total Participants: 3 Males and 3 Females

• Age range: 21 - 33

• 2 Tests per participants were collected. Pre-Gatorade and post-Gatorade.

• Pre-Gatorade: Follow recommended protocol:

No food or drinks were to be consumed at least 2 hours before the

• Post-Gatorade: Approximately 16 ounces of Gatorade to be consumed within 5 minutes and another 16 ounces within the next 5 minutes. Wait 25 minutes, then re-test.

Results• With the exception of 2 outliers body % fat, volume,

and mass increased while density decreased (due to density being inversely proportional to volume D=M/V).

• No statistical significance was found (p=0.4)

Results

Results

Results

• 2 Female subjects’ body % fat, volume, and mass decreased while density increased.

Conclusion• Most subjects’ body composition readings POST

Gatorade were what was expected.

• 2 outliers’ body composition readings were the opposite of what was expected.

• Validity of BodPod?o 4 compartment vs 2 compartment models

fat mass, total body water, bone mineral mass, residual

up to 3.5% difference (Withers, R.T. et al, 1998)