Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Post on 22-Feb-2016

39 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance . Maxine Schache. Background. Story. Implications. Maxine. Grumble. Background. Background. Results. Representative sample. 64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations) 59 Low level sprinklers. Results. Results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance

Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache

Background

Story

Implications

MaxineGrumble

Background

Background

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

drip

low level

overhead

Pressure variation %

Disc

harg

e va

riatio

n %

ResultsRepresentative sample

64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations)

59 Low level sprinklers

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

6.7% PV7.4% DV

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

33.3% PV4.2% DV

70.4% PV11.4% DV

Results

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate

Non PC 6.7,7.4,3

PC 13.6,8.3,2.2

PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6

PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4

PC 69.2, 8,2.3

PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3

PC 9.1, 2.4,2

PC 20, 11.5, 2.3

PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3

PC 23.9, 9.5, 2

PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6

PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3

PC 10, 12.5, 2.3

Pressure KPa

Dis

char

ge L

/Hr

9.1% PV2.4% DV

Results

Drip 9/64 pressure5/49 discharge

Sprinkler38/59 pressure23/59 discharge12/59 DU

Results

Grade Drips Low level sprinklers

A

B

C D

FAIL

WHY SO BAD?

PC

CID&

Industry confidence

&training

?