Post on 07-Jun-2020
i
Inuit Art as Cultural Diplomacy between Canada and India
Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic
Mandeep Roshi Chadha
A Thesis
in
The Department
of
Art History
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts (Art History) at
Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada
April 2014
© Mandeep Roshi Chadha 2014
ii
Concordia University School of Graduate Studies
This is to certify that the thesis prepared
By: Mandeep Roshi Chadha
Entitled: Inuit Art as Cultural Diplomacy between Canada and India: Sanaugavut, Inuit Art from the Canadian North
and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Masters of Arts (Art History)
complies with the regulations of the requirements and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality.
Signed by the final examining committee:
_________________________________________________________Chair
____________________Dr. Cynthia Hammond_________Examiner
_____________________Dr. Heather Igloliorte_________Examiner
______________________Dr. Anne Whitelaw_______ Supervisor
Approved by___________________________ ______________________
Dr. Anne Whitelaw, Graduate Program Director
_____________________________ ___________________ Catherine Wild, Dean Faculty of Fine Arts Date ___December 15, 2013
iii
ABSTRACT Inuit Art as Cultural Diplomacy between Canada and India
Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic
On the 27th of September, 2010 an exhibition of Inuit Art entitled
Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic, organized by the National Gallery of
Canada, opened at the National Museum of India. Canada gained visibility with the
Indian public as well as an international audience as the inauguration of Sanaugavut
coincided with the opening of the Commonwealth Games in India.
An exploration of Sanaugavut contributes to the understanding of the way
that Inuit art, as an artform and through the medium of exhibition, has been used
by the Canadian government in furthering political and economic aspirations. The
focus of this thesis then, is the study of the use of Inuit art in cultural diplomacy
internationally and specifically in the case of Sanaugavut, between Canada and
India.
Cultural diplomacy can be defined as an opportunity to foster mutual
understanding by presenting cultural knowledge and furthering an understanding
of a nation. The opportunity is the essence of the ‘soft power’ of an exhibition - its
ability to present the mood of the country, providing an awareness of the
characteristics of its societies and a landscape in which its politics operate.
Sanaugavut, as an example of soft-power, was used as a tool in the promotion of
Canada’s nationhood.
iv
Acknowledgements
A special thanks to my husband, Baljit, whose unrelenting support for the
exhibition Sanaugavut, monetarily and morally, made reality of what seemed often
impossible to happen. For the support and encouragement he has given me
throughout my studies and to follow my passion, I am forever indebted. To Harkeet
and Gurveen, for your patience, ‘allowing’ me to be a student, sharing my trials and
tribulations at all times and being my sounding board.
To Pierre Theberge and Marc Mayer, my sincere thanks, for accepting to
enter into unchartered waters with my proposal to have a cultural exchange with
India. A special acknowledgement is needed for Karen Stothart, my comrade in
India, whose professionalism was to the rescue when faced with some nerve-
racking moments of negotiations with the Indian bureaucrats.
To Christine Lalonde, a heartfelt thank you, not only for your generosity of
time that you have given me for my research, but for enriching my life with the
discovery of issues around exhibiting Indigenous art.
My profound thanks go to my academic advisor, Professor Anne Whitelaw,
whose editorial comments, and insightful observations, time and time again,
resulted in a much stronger thesis. To Dr. Heather Igloliorte, I thank you for your
support and enthusiasm for my work, it made it all worthwhile.
I will be remiss if I did not acknowledge all the strong women in my life – my
Mom, Naina Masi, Romy, Jasmeet and Pam – this is for you – for your love and
support always. Lastly, to my Dora, this would have been impossible without you.
v
Dedication
In loving memory of my grandmother, Kundan Anand. For living her life for others, sharing her wisdom and leaving behind
incredible memories….
“One of the deep secrets of life is that all that is really worth doing is what we do for others.”
Lewis Carroll
vi
Table of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1
Section 1: The Inuit, their Art and the Canadian Government .............................................. 5
Section 2: Inuit Art as a Marker of National Pride .................................................................. 11
Section 3: Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic .................................................. 18
Section 4: Cultural Exchange and Diplomatic Relationship - Canada and India ......... 33
Section 5: Sanaugavut and Power Cloths: Cultural Diplomacy in action ........................ 41
Conclusion: The North and Beyond .............................................................................................. 46
Bibliography .......................................................................................................................................... 43
1
Inuit Art as Cultural Diplomacy between Canada and India Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic
Introduction
On the 27th of September, 2010 an exhibition of Inuit Art entitled
Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic, organized by the National Gallery
of Canada, opened at the National Museum of India, capping four years1 of
collaboration between the two institutions and marking the signing of a series of
economic, political and cultural Memorandums of Understanding between India
and Canada. This was not the first time that Inuit art had been used by Canada as
a marker of national identity and pride. As Canadian art historian Ingo Hessel has
suggested, “Canada, a young country with an ongoing identity crisis, has adopted
Inuit art as its symbol of the north, which plays an important role in the nation’s
mythology.”2
The Federal Government of Canada, through the Arctic Division of the
Department of Mines and Resources, and the Northwest Territories Council
sponsored the establishment of a handicraft industry in the Arctic in 1949. The
government’s northern program of organizing the Inuit artists into co-operatives
and engaging their art in a domestic and foreign relations campaign, helped evolve
Inuit Art from small hand crafted carvings to positioning it as fine art. Supported by
1 The lag time of four years was due to the changes in the senior administration, namely the director of the
National Museum in Delhi. Since the museum director is a Ministerial appointment, Mr. Vijay Madan, who
was the director with whom the initial agreement had been finalized, was replaced by two successive
appointments, causing the delay of showcasing Sanaugavut.
2 Ingo Hessel. “Art and Identity,” in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 1998), 186
2
the Canadian public and a burgeoning international art market, Inuit art
experienced an affirmation of its cultural practices. The success of the now familiar
“soap-stone” carvings is attributed to art collecting enthusiasts, governments and
institutions. Government institutions such as the National Gallery and later the
National Film Board helped position art as a concept of national pride and
expression of national identity; bringing Inuit Art into the Canadian consciousness
as symbols of national heritage.
Questioning the prevailing appeal and use of Inuit Art, in his article “Inuit Art
and Canadian Nationalism: Why Eskimos? Why Canada?”, Nelson Graburn, outlines
some reasons for the successful reception of Inuit sculptures and prints: “the
favourable image of the Inuit; the titillation of something new; lack of competition
with mainstream art; and mostly because that these arts are the products of
“natural” Canadians…they were ideally suited to succeed the Group of Seven.”3 The
anthropological and ethnocentric idea of “natural” Canadians as described in Nelson
Graburn’s description of the use of Inuit art to express Canadian nationalism is
thought-provoking in the fact that Indigenous Art is serving a purpose that is not
really that of its makers’. The long history of the Canadian state using Inuit art to
sell itself abroad, while actively oppressing Inuit within its national borders, is
problematic and hypocritical. Graburn’s underlying argument for the co-opting of
Native imagery highlights the irony that this art which many see as indicative of a
strong and vibrant Inuit culture, “was motivated at least in part by a need to remedy
3 Nelson Graburn. “Inuit Art and Canadian Nationalism: Why Eskimos? Why Canada?,” Inuit Art
Quarterly (Summer 1986): 5-7.
3
the desperate conditions in which many Inuit were living as a result of contact with
immigrant culture.”4 Art historian, Heather Igloliorte, whose research interest is the
contemporary Inuit, derides the Canadian government’s use of Inuit art whilst the
Inuit society is “debased, devalued, exploited and eroded in the North…”5 The
Canadian government has with the greatest of ease abandoned Inuit people at the
same time as they have latched onto their artistic production to promote national
identity, voraciously celebrating the same arts and traditional culture they worked
to dismantle.
Since the early 1950s, the Department of External Affairs and other
departments of the federal government have used exhibitions of Inuit art
internationally to introduce this art form as a commodity. Inuit art became an
appealing form of art for the promotion of Canada and such exhibitions became
examples (or instances) of cultural diplomacy. Joseph Nye, a political scientist,
sees such cultural endeavours as inclusive, educational and dynamic, situating
them as “soft power”6 within the larger context of power relations. I argue that
cultural initiatives, like Sanaugavut, are examples of ‘soft power’.
4 Nelson Graburn. “Inukshuk: Icon of the Inuit of Nunavut,” Inuit Studies, (Winter 2004): 26.
5 Heather Igloliorte. “The Inuit of Our Imagination,” in Inuit Modern, ed. Gerald McMaster (Vancouver:
Douglas & McIntyre, 2011), 45.
6 Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (Cambridge: Public Affairs,
2004), 74.2. “Power is the ability to influence the behaviour of others to get the outcomes you want. There
are several ways one can achieve this: you can coerce them with threats; you can induce them with
payments; or you can attract and co-opt them to want what you want. This soft power- getting others to
want the outcomes you want- co-opts people rather than coerces them. It can be contrasted with 'hard
power', which is the use of coercion and payment.”
4
Cynthia P Schneider, a former U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands and a
Professor at Georgetown University in the Practice of Diplomacy, believes that
“Cultural diplomacy [is] the exchange of ideas, information, art and other aspects
of culture among nations and their people to foster mutual understanding…all a
nation does to present itself to the world.”7 Foreign policies are complicated,
especially when contrasted with cultural exchanges which act as key elements in
promoting an indispensable insight into other countries, breaking down barriers
and destroying stereotypes. My exploration of Sanaugavut will contribute to the
understanding of the way that Inuit art, as an artform and through the medium of
exhibition, has been used by the Canadian government to further political and
economic aspirations; in other words, I will examine how Inuit art has been used
for the purposes of cultural diplomacy, internationally and specifically in the case
of Sanaugavut, between Canada and India.
This thesis begins by providing a historical overview of the Canadian
Government’s involvement and influence in the development of Inuit art and its
dissemination as a construct of Canadian nationhood, locally and abroad. With
the support of Canadian consular officers, exhibitions of Inuit art were
specifically organised to further Canada’s agenda of immigration and economic
alliances creating significant moments of cultural diplomacy. In 2010, Sanaugavut
was the first exhibition of Inuit art from Canada8 to open in New Delhi, coinciding
7 Cynthia P. Schneider. “The Unrealized Potential of Cultural Diplomacy: “Best Practices” and What
Could Be, If Only…,” Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society (Winter 2010): 261. 8 An Exhibition of Canadian Painting from the National Gallery of Canada travelled to India, Pakistan and
Ceylon in 1954-1955. Shown at Karachi, Pakistan, Dec., 1954; Lahore, Pakistan, Dec., 1954; Peshawar,
5
with the Commonwealth Games in India, as well as another exhibition, Power
Cloths of the Commonwealth, which exhibited Indigenous textiles from 22
Commonwealth countries. Finally, by juxtaposing Sanaugavut and Power Cloths,
the problematic question of the use of Indigenous art as a marker of a national
identity by ex-colonial nations is analyzed.
Section 1: The Inuit, their Art and the Canadian Government
The Inuit have lived in the Arctic regions of Canada for over four thousand
years. The term ‘Inuit’, originating from their native language Inuktitut, was
introduced into the English language in the 1970s and refers to the peoples of the
Canadian Central and Eastern Arctic. There are about 55,000 Inuit living in Northern
Canada today.9 These Indigenous populations of Canada, living in a harsh climate,
developed over centuries a unique form of art. Beginning with the use of ivory to
make small scale miniatures of everyday objects and animals, these carving
practices led to stone sculptures, primarily soapstone, and depictions of humans,
animals and imaginative creatures. These carvings remained small as the Inuit
population was semi-nomadic, pursuing game on which they depended for survival.
The transportation of large pieces was impractical and a burden for such a transient
people. The arrival of European whalers in the 1700s gradually changed the Inuit
way of life. The Qallunaat, the Inuktitut word for white man, ventured into the
Pakistan, Dec., 1954; New Delhi, India, Jan., 1955; Calcutta, India, Feb., 1955; Madras, India, Feb., 1955;
Bombay, India, Mar., 1955; Colombo, Ceylon, May, 1955; Kandy, Ceylon, June, 1955.
For further details see: The National Gallery of Canada. http://bibcat.gallery.ca/search 9 Mary Simon. “Story of the Changing People,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi:
Creative Offset, 2010), 11.
6
remote Arctic region primarily for the trade of fur, an industry that peaked in the
1920s and early 1930s. Christian missionaries arrived in the Arctic in the late
nineteenth century, and encouraged Inuit to settle around missions.10
In the era following the Second World War, political interest arose in the DEW
(Distant Early Warning) Line.11 The Canadian and United States governments signed
a bilateral agreement to create this Arctic national radar controlled defense line. The
creation of the DEW line resulted in the increased militarization of Canadian
borders, promoting Canadian political autonomy. The DEW line, situated in the
Canadian North, has played an important role geographically in diminishing the
vulnerability of Canada to its neighbors, as well as highlighting the importance of
this region. However, the inhabitants of the North, “took a back seat to what
Canadian planners and politicians considered the real crisis: the Cold War and the
perceived threat of the Soviet Union.”12 Policies were clearly outlined for all
governmental activities in the Canadian North to ensure two prime objectives: the
“Re-Canadianization of Northern Canada and keeping the Canadian Arctic
10
For a detailed history of the development of Inuit art see texts by Darlene Wight, Susan Gustavision,
Ingo Hessel, Christine Lalonde and Norman Vorano in: Darlene Coward Wight “Birth of an Art Form:
1949 to 1959,” in Creation and Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas &
McIntyre, 2012)
11
From the beginning of the development of the DEW Line (The Distant Early Warning Line) idea,
Canadian concerns over political perception grew enormously. Canadian Arctic historian P. Whitney
Lackenbauer argues that the Canadian Government saw little intrinsic value in the Arctic, but due to fear of
Americanization and American penetration into the Canadian Arctic, brought significant changes and a
more militaristic role to the north. This shift into a more military role began with a transition of authority,
shifting responsibility of Arctic defense in Canada from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to the
Canadian Forces. For further information refer to: Lynden T. Harris. “The DewLine Chronicles: A
History”. http://www.lswilson.ca/dewhist-a.htm#Z. January 6, 2014.
12
Richard Diubaldo. “Whither the Inuit?,” The Government of Canada and the Inuit: 1900-1967 (Ottawa:
Research branch, Corporate Policy Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1985), 107.
7
Canadian.”13 The formulation of new policies was urgent and a priority to show the
world that “Canada was indeed a great Northern power.”14 In these post war years
when Canada was building a new identity as a social welfare state, the Inuit lost
their source of income by the collapse of the fur trade and changing Caribou
migration patterns leading to the Canadian government response to the famine in
the North by moving many of the Inuit from their seasonal camps into settlements
to receive social services in the 1950s.15
Finding a viable industry for the economic support of populations in the
Canadian Arctic was necessary with the collapse of the fur trade in the 1930s and so
began the industry and trade of Inuit art. The development of this art form from
ivory to stone carvings can be traced through the efforts of Toronto artist James
Houston16 in collaboration with the federal government, the Canadian Handicrafts
Guild and the Hudson’s Bay Company. James Houston was a Canadian artist, but his
biggest accomplishment was his work in the Eastern Arctic of Canada, developing
Inuit art. In 1948, Houston traveled to a small Inuit community in Arctic Quebec,
Inukjuak (then Port Harrison), to draw and paint images of the Inuit and the Arctic
landscape. Houston recognized the aesthetic appeal of the objects produced by the
13
Diubaldo. p. 108
14
Nelson Graburn. “Inuit Art and Canadian Nationalism: Why Eskimo? Why Canada?,” Inuit Art
Quarterly (Summer 1986): 5-7
15
For further details on the governments’ involvement in the relocation of the Inuit see: Richard Diubaldo.
“Relocation,” The Government of Canada and the Inuit: 1900-1967. (Ottawa: Research branch, Corporate
Policy Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1985), 118.
16 For further details on James Houston’s involvement in the development of Inuit Art see: Kristin K.
Potter. “James Houston, Armchair Tourism, and the Marketing of Inuit Art,” Native American Art in the
Twentieth Century, ed. W. Jackson Rushing (London and New York: Routledge, 1999), 39-59.
8
Inuit and returned to the Canadian Handicrafts Guild, in Montreal, with roughly a
dozen small carvings, done mostly in steatite. The Guild, which had tried as early as
the 1920s to foster an Inuit-handicrafts market, was impressed with the carving;
they were equally impressed by Houston. The Guild secured a federal government
grant of $1,100 and sent Houston back north in the summer of 1949 to make bulk
purchases in various communities in the Eastern Arctic. When Houston returned to
Montreal that fall, the Guild mounted their first exhibition of what was then known
as "Eskimo"17 carvings. According to collector Ian Lindsay, the first exhibition was a
complete sell-out. The government put more resources into developing an art and
handicrafts market in the Arctic, hiring Houston to live in Cape Dorset as the first
"roving crafts officer", and tapping him to write promotional material for sales in the
south. The federal government encouraged and supported the development of Inuit
Art after World War II with policies from Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent’s
government (1948-1957) that targeted effective administration of the North.
Funding was subsequently sent to the North through The Canadian Handicrafts
Guild as shipping and marketing of Inuit Art was undertaken by The Hudson’s Bay
Company.18
In November of 1951, The Department of Resources and Development (deputy
minister H.A. Young) acknowledged the change in Inuit life from semi-nomadic
17
In Canada, the term "Inuit" is now preferred
18
Darlene Coward Wight. “Birth of an Art Form: 1949 to 1959,” in Creation and Transformation: Defining
Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 22. “The purchase system was quite simple.
Houston deposited funds provided by the Canadian Handicrafts Guild with the manager of the local
Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) post. Houston travelled into camps by dog team, encouraging production
and providing handwritten chits that could be exchanged for goods at the HBC post”.
9
hunting to sedentary settlements, and thought it was time to convene and address
the issue of the Inuit obtaining a living and gainful employment for themselves. This
resulted in the establishment of the Eskimo Affairs Committee in 1952 that focused
on providing the Inuit with education and training for employment locally and
outside of the Arctic. The Federal government responded to the necessity of
providing social services for the Inuit population by establishing The Department of
Northern Affairs and National Resources in 1953 (renamed in 1966 The Department
of Indian Affairs and Northern Development). Support of the developing Inuit art
market continued into the 1960s with the Federal government initiative of funding
artist co-ops across the Arctic. The model of art producing co-operatives was vital in
the creation of economic centres in Inuit settlements in the Arctic, beginning with
the founding of the West Baffin (give full title) in Cape Dorset in (date).19 By early
1954 all carvings were being purchased by the Hudson’s Bay Company; half the
carvings were shipped to the Guild in Montreal and half went to the Hudson’s Bay
Company’s warehouse depot in Winnipeg. The acquisition of Inuit sculpture by art
institutions began as early as 1957 at The Winnipeg Art Gallery20 and The Montreal
19
As an alternative economic form for the Inuit the Department of Northern Affairs and National
Resources made money, equipment and expertise available, but the idea from the beginning was that Inuit
would assume management and ownership of the co-ops as soon as possible. The first Inuit co-operative
was established in April 1959 at George River (now Kangiqsualujjuaq) in Northern Québec. Marybelle
Mitchell provides a complete analysis of the Inuit co-ops as a development tool used by the state.
Mitchell’s argument is that Inuit nationalism, most evident in the negotiations leading to the formation of
Nunavut, can be directly linked to the consolidating effect of the pan-Arctic co-operative movement. For
complete details see: Marybelle Mitchell. “From Talking Chiefs to a native Corporate Elite,” The Birth of
Class and Nationalism among Canadian Inuit (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press,
1996)
20
The Winnipeg Art Gallery founded on December 16, 1912 became the first public art gallery in Canada.
For further details on Inuit Art and the Winnipeg Art Gallery see: Darlene Coward Wight. “Inuit Art at the
Winnipeg Art Gallery: An Introduction,” Creation and Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art.
(Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 5.
10
Museum of Fine Arts. The Co-ops, established by the 1960s, provided an alternative
outlet for the carvings when the Hudson’s Bay Company became less involved in the
Inuit art market. In February 1960, an inaugural gala was held at the Montreal
Museum of Fine Arts, showcasing the first Cape Dorset annual print collection.
Prints were purchased by major public art galleries, including the National Gallery
of Canada. 21 By 1988 the National Gallery of Canada opened its first permanent
galleries devoted to Inuit Art publicly recognizing this art form.
The subject matter of the Inuit artwork promoted by the Canadian
government was primarily based on common Inuit practices such as hunting as well
as their spiritual connection to the nature around them. Instead of encouraging and
supporting these practices, the government regulated much of this hunting and
displaced semi nomadic communities into settlements where still to this day there is
overcrowding and limited access to social services. Canada's interest in the North
was based on activities such as whaling, mining, oil and gas exploration, fur trading,
and the construction of the DEW Line. Inuit people were often moved to police
posts, Hudson's Bay posts and missions to bolster sovereignty claims. The Canadian
government depended on the Hudson's Bay Company and the missions to take
responsibility for Inuit education until 1955 when the Department of Northern
21
For further details on the commercialization of Inuit Art see: Darlene Coward Wight. “Birth of an Art
Form: 1949 to 1959,” Creation and Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas
& McIntyre, 2012), 19.
11
Affairs and National Resources took charge of the northern education system.22 By
the 1930s, Christian day and boarding schools were scattered throughout the
Northwest Territories around the principal trading posts. The mission schools
received grants from the federal government based on enrolment. Between 1944
and 1956, government policy actively promoted Inuit participation in the wage
economy and vocational schools were built for this purpose. After 1970, control of
education was handed over to the new Northwest Territories government. The
subject of Inuit spirituality, that all things - people, animals and forces of nature -
had spirits, was particularly oppressed by a government forcing Christianity onto
the population. At the same time, Inuit artwork, dominated by depictions of
Shamans and spirits, was being used as a representation of nationhood by the
government.
Section 2: Inuit Art as a marker of National Pride
With the establishment of Canada as an independent nation in the nineteenth
century, the federal government acknowledged the need to preserve heritage
through documents and cultural artifacts, searching to establish a unique Canadian
identity from which to promote nationhood. The funding was largely given to
archives, museums and art galleries. The National Museum of Canada (later known
as the Museum of Civilization) began with a grant from Queen Victoria in 1841 and
The National Archives of Canada was formed in 1903. It was however, not until after
World War II, heeding an acceleration of general growth in state involvement in
22
For more details on the government’s involvement in education for the Inuit see: Richard Diubaldo.
“Whither the Inuit?,” The Government of Canada and the Inuit: 1900-1967 (Ottawa: Research branch,
Corporate Policy Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1985), 110.
12
social life, that Canada’s government began to seriously consider its involvement
and policies in the arts.
As a Commonwealth country searching to establish itself as an independent
and unique nation economically and culturally on the international market, Canada
used the exhibition of Inuit art to convey a connection with the land and its oldest
inhabitants. External Affairs and other governmental agencies developed an
exhibitionary plan for touring Inuit Art in the promotion of Canada as a nation.
Bruce Ferguson, an international art curator, explains the importance of exhibitions
as a “main agency of communication,”23 elaborating that “exhibitions act as the
visible encounter with a public which receives and acknowledges their import and
projected status as important signs of important signs.”24 The touring Inuit Art
exhibitions became a vehicle for promoting nationhood to a greater audience
abroad, paving the way to communicate the political agenda of the Canadian
government.
The first concentrated effort to exhibit Inuit Art outside Canada was
organized by The Department of Trade and Commerce at Rockefeller Plaza in New
York City in February 1952. The lure of Inuit art is attributed to the public’s
fascination with primitive art, which is partly ascribed to the visual image of the
makers of this art as living in far-away lands, in harsh conditions. This romanticized
image of the primitive artist is explored by anthropologist Nelson Graburn:
23
Bruce W. Ferguson. "Exhibition Rhetorics: Material speech and utter sense,” in Thinking about
exhibitions, eds. Reesa Greenberg, Bruce Ferguson and Sandy Nairne (London: Routledge, 1996), 176.
24
Ferguson 175.
13
Even dealers and critics have tended to cling to the romantic mythology of the distant, untouched “primitive” Eskimos, and for good reason. The vast majority of the public to whom dealers cater, subscribe to the ethnocentric deception that it is we Westerners who are making progress and that nature and “natural” people are in some “frozen” state of purity, providing a reference by which to measure our “progress” or our “fall” – depending on our ideology. Eskimo objects continue to satisfy a contemporary spiritual quest for truth and authenticity.25
This representation of the Indigenous artist as “natural” and close to the land
dominated exhibitions of Inuit art throughout the twentieth century and was a key
part of the art form’s appeal to viewers in Canada and abroad.
James Houston, capitalizing on southerners’ enthusiasm for Inuit art,
published an article in the spring 1952 edition of Canadian Art, “In search of
contemporary Eskimo Art.” This article was read by Charles Gimpel, the co-owner of
the Gimpel Fils Gallery in London, who made inquiries with a Hudson’s Bay
Company employee in London about the possibility of hosting an Inuit sculpture
exhibition from May to July 1953 to coincide with the coronation of Queen Elizabeth
the Second. He was directed to the Canadian High Commission in London, who
relayed the information to the Department of Resources and Development in
Ottawa. The exhibition was organised with the help of Canadian External Affairs, the
Canadian High Commission in London, the Hudson’s Bay Company and the Canadian
Handicrafts Guild, and built on the connection between Britain and Canada. The cost
of the exhibition was shared by the Department of Resources and Development,
25
Nelson Graburn. “Inuit Art and Canadian Nationalism: Why Eskimo? Why Canada?,” Inuit Art
Quarterly (Summer 1986): 5-7.
14
which paid the cost of shipping; the Canadian Handicrafts Guild, which lent about
100 pieces from its collection; and the Gimpel Fils gallery, which arranged and
publicized the exhibition in London and also paid the cost of printing the
catalogue.26 According to curator Norman Vorano, “The objects were singularized
through several exhibitionary means: by overhead lighting focused squarely on each
artwork; by perching each sculpture atop a neutral- gray, velvet podium; by
avoiding the use of table- displays (which tended to display the sculptures as a flea
market items) and by attributing an artist’s name, title and date to every carving...”27
The display was an example of the way Inuit art was presented according to western
conceptions of the aesthetic.
As Inuit Art began to travel, an interest developed among foreigners for this
art form. In the summer of 1953, The Gemeentemuseum’s director Dr. Lewis
Wijsenbeek, approached Canada’s Chargé d’Affaires at the Canadian embassy in The
Netherlands, Paul Tremblay, to receive an exhibition of Inuit Art. Officials at
External Affairs remained skeptical, raising concern that an exhibition of Inuit art
might serve to strengthen European perceptions that Canada was an inhospitable
country with a harsh, ice bound climate. 28 Reflecting the increasing emphasis being
placed on Northern concerns, a program of Inuit Art exhibitions was linked to
cultural and information activities of Canadian consulates abroad. The Department 26
Norman Vorano. “The Globalization of Inuit Art in the 1950s and 1960s,” Creation and Transformation:
Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 52.
27
Norman Vorano. Inuit art in the Qallunaat world: Modernism, museums and the popular imaginary,
1949-1962. (PhD Thesis. University of Rochester at Rochester, 2007), 346.
28
Norman Vorano. “The Globalization of Inuit Art in the 1950s and 1960s,” Creation and Transformation:
Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 54.
15
of External Affairs reached out to its consular offices across Europe to gather
information on the potential exhibition and promotion of Inuit Art. Ambassadors
spoke to museums, galleries and scholars in their respective regions, and came back
with enormously positive feedback. This resulted in Canada Eskimo Art, an
exhibition that was sent on a Western European Tour from 1956 to1959, when it
was briefly brought home to be refreshed. At that time, prints were added as
printmaking was a new development to Inuit art, and the exhibition was then re-
sent on tour to Eastern European countries and the Soviet Union for another two
years until mid-1962.29 Over the following years, the federal government supported
exhibitions of Inuit Art touring the United States and international venues. These
exhibitions of Inuit Art enhanced Canada’s international profile as the openings
were prestigious, attended by high-ranking politicians who used these occasions to
promote trade first with the United States and then with primarily Western markets.
Inuit art thus became a tool for Canada in cultural diplomacy, a political strategy
which intended to facilitate and improve relations and collaboration between
different countries.
Facilitating the job of promoting art, the federal government implemented
policies which assisted them in becoming cultural brokers30 of Inuit art. The most
29
Vorano 53.
30
Norman Vorano discusses the work of the Eskimo Affairs Committee. Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent
called upon Major General H.A. Young, the commissioner of the Northwest Territories and Deputy
Minister of the Department of Resources and Development to convene ‘General Committee meetings on
Eskimo Affairs’. “The committee recommended the establishment of cultural brokers, or “Eskimo Field
officers.” The committee envisioned Government employees who could work in the North and the South to
develop local industries and “stimulate and organizer handicrafts.” For further details see: Norman Vorano.
Inuit art in the Qallunaat world: Modernism, museums and the popular imaginary, 1949-1962. (PhD
Thesis. University of Rochester at Rochester, 2007).
16
comprehensive development of Canadian cultural policy was the Royal Commission
on National Development in the Arts, Letters and Sciences,31 with Vincent Massey as
its chairman established in 1949 and published its report in 1951. The initial
mandate of the commission was expanded by Prime Minister St. Laurent to include a
focus on increasing the national as well as the international scope of Canadian
culture and to find “methods for the purpose of making available to the people of
foreign countries adequate information concerning Canada.”32
One of the ways that the Canadian government sought to increase knowledge
about Canada internationally was to present the new emerging art form of Inuit art.
Over the next twenty years this attempt to reach an international audience took
shape in the form of exhibitions shown in major public museums. Sculpture Inuit:
Masterworks of the Canadian Arctic was organized in 1971 by The Canadian Eskimo
Arts Council, itself a government sponsored body designed to control the production
and circulation of Inuit prints. Funded by the government’s Department of Indian
Affairs and Northern Development, supported by The National Museum of Man and
31
The Massey Commission, a name commonly applied to the Royal Commission on National Development
in the Arts, Letters and Sciences, was appointed by the federal government by an Order in Council dated 8
April 1949. In the major cities of Canada between August 1949 and July 1950, the commission held public
sessions at which most of the 450 submitted briefs were heard, and it invited experts in various fields to
prepare special studies. In 1951 the commission issued a report which became known as the 'Massey report'
and gained recognition as a document of utmost importance in the cultural history of Canada since it
advocated the principle of federal government patronage of a wide range of cultural activities and proposed
the establishment of Canada Council for the Encouragement of the Arts, Letters, Humanities and Social
Sciences. For the complete report see: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/5/index-e.html
32
Prime Minister St. Laurent asks Vincent Massey for this inclusion, to the terms of reference of the
commission, in a letter dated April 25, 1950. For further details see: Library and Archives Canada.
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/massey/h5-404-e.html. 21
17
External Affairs, Sculpture Inuit travelled internationally to venues such as The
British Museum and the Musée de L’ Homme in Paris.
In 2010, the federal government continued using Inuit art to promote Canada
internationally by including it in the Memorandum of Understanding between
Canada and India. Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic was a
collaboration between two cultural institutions, the National Gallery of Canada and
the National Museum of India. Describing Sanaugavut, as “an excellent introduction
to Inuit art and a chance for the Indian public to see an exhibition that represents a
remarkable chapter in Canadian art history,”33 the Director of the National Gallery of
Canada, Marc Mayer, situated Inuit art as an important and integral segment of
Canadian art. Sanaugavut presented Inuit history, traditions and art to the Indian
public in terms of historical as well as contemporary importance, highlighting
changes in the production of Inuit visual culture from before contact to the present.
Sanaugavut follows the Canadian government’s previous initiatives to use
Inuit Art in the promotion of Canada abroad. However, while Sanaugavut fulfilled
the goals in the promotion of Canada, funding for the exhibition was not
forthcoming from the state. Prior to the exhibition, funding for the promotion of
Canadian culture abroad was drastically slashed in the Conservative minority
government’s 2008 budget, and the Department of Canadian Heritage’s budget was
cut by approximately $45 million dollars. The travel of Sanaugavut to India was
funded entirely through private support (although expenses for the coordination,
33
Marc Mayer.” Preface,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi: Creative Offset,
2010) 7.
18
design and curatorial work of the exhibition were covered by the National Gallery of
Canada, which is a Crown Corporation funded by the Federal government). The
exhibition was conceived as a transcultural exchange, and displaying Inuit Art as a
nation’s art played a vital role in jumpstarting political and economic relations
between the two countries, demonstrated through the official signing of an India-
Canada Memorandum of Understanding in 2010, the year Sanaugavut opened in
New Delhi.
Section 3: Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic
Cover of the catalogue for the Sanaugavut exhibition
The exhibition Sanaugavut was organised along two axes of chronology and
geography. Sanaugavut, meaning ‘our art’ in Inuktitut, focused on the most recent
19
stage of the art form that tells a story of cultural survival and identity. The
cornerstone of this exhibition is the fact that Inuit art reflects Inuit identity, which
collectively over six decades has been nurtured by artists, who have expressed
themselves and their culture by contributing to a body of work that manifests Inuit
spirituality. Material and stylistic approaches differ among the artists, and such
diversity of practices is underpinned by themes that reflect the artists’ shared
heritage. The exhibition sought to present Inuit art practices from the late 1940s to
the present, portraying the inhabitants of Arctic communities as thriving and
productive. The presentation of sculptures from the 1950s through to prints,
drawings and more recent video work, demonstrated not only the evolution of Inuit
art but displayed the Canadian government’s involvement in the North. Considering
that the exhibition of objects in Sanaugavut were displayed in a historical sequence,
it remains clear that despite the inclusion of contemporary Inuit artists and media
forms, the history and politics which promoted this art form are present within its
chronological display.
To arrive at the upper floor galleries where Sanaugavut was installed, the
viewer had to pass through the permanent sculpture collection of the National
Museum of India, which consists of stone relics from ancient India. Further along,
viewers entered the exhibition through a passageway highlighted with not only the
title and sponsors of the show, but also two large images of Inuit sculptures from
1980 and 2000. The first room was dark and sparsely lit. There were spotlights
highlighting each piece, drawing the viewer particularly towards the pedestals upon
which the sculptures were displayed. The walls as well as the exhibition text were a
20
dark colour, further enhancing the dramatic feeling created with this particular
lighting scheme. The exhibition design of wall colouring, lighting, and placement of
the text as well as the curatorial layout were all specified by the team from the
National Gallery of Canada. The sculptures were ensconced behind plexi-glass cases,
all brought over from Canada, specifically constructed for this purpose. The plexi-
glass displays created an aura of fine art for the objects, facilitating the narrative of
the sculptures as Canadian treasures and impressing their assessed value on the
viewer. However, the glass cases also created a divide between the viewer and
object, a contrast to the Indian stone sculptures on the floor below, which were
completely accessible. The lighting and wall colouring in the rooms of the
Sanaugavut exhibition were in solemn tones of grays, lending a sense of mystique,
appropriate perhaps for the art work, but also lending a coolness to the display that
was distinctly separate from the warm colours of saffron and green associated with
India and used within the permanent galleries of the National Museum of India.
These sombre colors were often used in the display of Inuit art, as first seen in the
exhibition design by the National Gallery of Canada for the Eskimo Art exhibition at
the Gimpel Fils gallery in 195334. Similar to that exhibition, there was a dramatic use
of lighting, with each sculpture being perched atop a neutral-gray podium, this
colour emphasizing the aesthetic aspects of the work and environment. These hues
were drawn from the colours found in the natural environment of the northern
tundra, in keeping with the links between Indigenous peoples and nature.
34
For further reviews of the Eskimo Art exhibition see: Norman Vorano. “The Globalization of Inuit Art in
the 1950s and 1960s,” Creation and Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas
& McIntyre, 2012), 52.
21
Materials used in the transmission of information to the viewer throughout
the exhibition included: introductory panels describing the vital markers in Inuit
history and culture, a map and panels for each geographic region, explanatory labels
next to artworks, explanation of sculpture and printmaking materials and process –
all information included in wall text and images, and available to the viewers in both
English and Hindi. Interspersed through the exhibition were first-hand accounts of
the artists’ influences and techniques. For example, in one wall text, printmaker
Pudlo Pudlat states, “Artists draw what they think…that’s how they are. They draw
what they think- and what they have seen also. But sometimes they draw something
from their imagination, something that doesn’t exist anywhere in the world.”35
Pudlat implies within this statement that the work of Inuit artists must be
considered not only as part of a collective but individually as each artist has a
unique and original point of view in their expression. With these words, Pudlat is
also linking Inuit artists to the Western art historical practice of considering the
individual artist’s production over the collective. The rooms of the exhibition were
divided primarily by the geographic regions of the Inuit Nunangat36 made up of one
third of Canada’s landmass and half of its shorelines. Each room was designed to
present traditional Inuit cultural knowledge, technical expertise and stylistic
evolution, illustrated with examples of sculptures from the 1940s to the
contemporary period, with a piece made as recently as 2010. Works in all the
35
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Wall Labels ( Prints Drawings, Textile, Video)
36
Inuit Nunangat- The 4 regions are: Nunavik (“place to live”) stretches the farthest south, Nunavut (“our
land”) stretched the farthest north, Nunatsiavut (“our beautiful land”) is on Canada’s east coast, and
Inuvialuit (“real people”) is the settlement region of the Northwest Territories in the Western Arctic.
22
principal media used by Inuit artists were included: stone and ivory sculptures,
textile arts, and prints and drawings from each of the communities that have a print
studio.37
Entrance of the exhibition (Source: Personal album of Christine Lalonde)
The first room served to demonstrate the role of art within Inuit culture and
society prior to the imposition of Canadian policy and development of craft in the
North; it was used by the people, including hunters, to depict their natural
environment. The resulting small-scale pieces were used as objects of trade with
explorers, whalers and other travellers to their land, primarily from the Nunavik
37
List of print studios whose works were included in the exhibition: Pangnirtung, Kivalliq and Clyde River
in Baker Lake and Qikiqtaaluk region in Nunavut, Puvirnituq and Inukjuak in Nunavik, Ulukhaktok in the
Inuvialuit settlement region and Kivalliq region in Nunavut. Each print studio adopted a pictograph
symbol or “chop” to indicate the origin of the print. Pangnirtung has an inukshuk, Clyde River a bee, Cape
Dorset is an igloo, Ulukhaktok chose an ulu, Baker Lake’s symbol is the bow and arrow. For further details
see: Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi: Creative Offset, 2010), 98.
23
region, which included stone sculpture from the time of James Houston’s first visit to
the North. A wall case showed the small-scale sculptural work being made by the
Inuit before his arrival in 1948. The wall text in this room specifies that ‘the first
generation of Inuit carvers effectively translated their knowledge of the habits and
physical movement of Arctic wildlife into their art forms.”38 Pieces included Goose (c.
1940-60), unknown Inuit artist, and Seated Man Holding a Fox by the Leg (1949)
unknown Inuit artist, whose illustration of the technique of preparing a fox skin
depicts the Inuit’s active involvement in the Arctic fur trade. Family Moving Camp (c
1966) by Ennutsiak, portrays the semi-nomadic lifestyle of the Inuit travelling by
foot during the Summer months to get to the inland fish lakes carrying “their
personal effects in packs with tumplines around their heads.”39
The second room reflected Houston’s influence on Inuit craft, specifically
through the introduction of printmaking and textiles. It featured artists from
Nunavut and showcased the geographically different style developed between the
1960’s and 1980’s. This room included The Enchanted Owl (1960) by Cape Dorset
artist Kenojuak Ashevak, one of the first prints ever made by an Inuit artist.
Printmaking was introduced by Houston in Cape Dorset in 1957 with the stone
being used as a tool rather than as a resulting sculpture. Big Woman (1974) by Jessie
Oonark illustrated an elaborately dressed woman wearing an embellished amauti
(women’s parka). Her work spoke of women’s roles within the community,
including their development of sewing, embroidery and other clothing designs.
38
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Didactic information of Wall Casing A
39
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Didactic Wall Casing A
24
These were skills passed down through generations, carrying Inuit tradition and
style through time. As a recipient of the Order of Canada, “Jessie Oonark was an
artistic matriarch and became one of Canada’s most important artists.”40 By
identifying this artist as crucial in the Canadian cultural scene, the wall text informs
the viewer of the current importance and influence given to practicing Inuit artists
in Canada. Untitled, (1979), Duffel, felt and embroidery floss by Naomi Ityi is an
example of textile work emerging out of the craft programs occurring at the same
time as the beginning of print making and drawings. For centuries women have
been the gender responsible for the making of clothing, and so with the introduction
of a market for Inuit art, they began to use their skills in embroidery and applique
for the making of large-scale narrative scenes or abstract patterned wall hangings.
Ityi was one such artist from the Baker Lake region, where the creation of pictorial
works on cloth is most closely associated. As exhibition curator Christine Lalonde
states in the catalogue for Sanaugavut: “Through the creative efforts of artists
neevingatah, or wall hangings, have become a vital facet of Inuit Art.”41
The third room was devoted to the Nunatsiavut and Inuvialuit regions, and
featured contemporary influence and the introduction of new materials like silver
and ebony as seen in the work of Michael Massie’s uni-tea (2000). This teapot
sculpture evokes the form of the ulu, a knife traditionally used by a woman, but
through the material and composition displays a highly contemporary design, taking
40
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Didactic Wall labels ( Prints, Drawings, Textiles, Videos)
41
Christine Lalonde. “True North,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi: Creative
Offset, 2010), 112.
25
a traditional utilitarian object and transforming it into a colonial article. Shaman
Beckoning Spirits (2004) by Abraham Anghik Ruben, in Brazilian Soapstone,
interprets how “Christianity changed the status of the Shaman, reducing once-
powerful leaders to beggars.”42 The introduction of ceramic as a sculptural medium
is seen in the work of John Kurok and Leo Napayok’s Coat of Dreams (2006).
The last room focused on the practice of the artist through the display of
their tools, including axes, saws, chisels, electric power drills, files and sandpaper.
The visitor’s experience ended with a multi-media installation featuring a projection
of Qaggiq (Gathering place), a video (film?) from Zacharius Kunuk’s 1989
Unikaatuatiit (Story Tellers) series. This marked a departure from the now
recognizable sculpture and printmaking techniques of past generations and aligned
with the oldest form of Inuit culture expression, the oral tradition. As Lalonde
remarks: “The materials, imagery and meanings of these forms have undergone
numerous transformations in response to changing societal and physical
environments…the media of video and film, initially perceived as unconventional for
Inuit artists, have re-established ties to the oral traditions, songs, and performances,
giving the oldest modes of expression a contemporary relevance.”43 Although the
sequence of the rooms remained tied to a chronological history of the evolution of
Inuit Art, the objects themselves carried individual narratives on the relevant issues
in past as well as contemporary Inuit culture. Evolving from objects of trade to
42
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Didactic Sculpture Case labels
43
Christine Lalonde. “True North,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi: Creative
Offset, 2010), 17.
26
mythological depictions, Inuit artists established an art movement that, in the words
of the Inuit artist David Ruben Piqtoukun: “We have to ‘recycle’ all this knowledge in
order to deal with all the changes that have been brought to our doorsteps.”44
Throughout the first, second and third rooms, exhibition curator Christine
Lalonde presented a consistent aesthetic display of the artworks: the pedestals for
the sculptures were evenly dispersed throughout the rooms, the viewer did not have
a forced path of observation and sequence of objects, but rather an understanding of
the objects in each room as a part of a whole, although still maintaining a
chronological and geographic narrative. The prints and wall hangings in the second
and third rooms, introduced in the 1960s, showed the addition of new techniques
and media to the sculptural practices presented in the first room and continuing
throughout the exhibition. The last room was lighter in appearance, as its walls were
painted white instead of the dark grey that ran throughout the other rooms. This
room was used as a space to explain and elaborate on Inuit art production and the
tools which they use in production from past to present. The white colour on the
walls connoted both the ‘scientific’ in the sense of presenting techniques and the
‘fine arts’ to showcase the contemporaneity of the more recent practices. The white
walls also provided a contrast with the dark grey used in the previous rooms, which
reinforced a sense of the primitive. This room was used as a space to explain and
elaborate on Inuit art production. Part of the aim of establishing this cultural
dialogue between Canada and India was educating the Indian public on not only the
aesthetic value of Inuit Art but on the context of its production. Therefore the
44
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Wall Text – Direct quotes from Inuit artists
27
display of tools was necessary in order to inform the viewers about the techniques
used by the artists.
The catalogue for Sanaugavut elaborates on the history and artistic practice
of Inuit Art as introduced in the exhibition, recounting the developments of Inuit
society. The catalogue included an essay from Mary Simon, President of the Inuit
Tapirlit Kanatami,45 which provides a national voice of the Inuit in Canada. Writing
for an exhibition catalogue for the first time, Simon promotes Sanaugavut as “one of
the highlights of 2010 Year of the Inuit in Canada, a campaign to raise awareness of
Inuit traditions and achievements.”46 Her essay traces the history of Inuit society
and culture from a broader perspective, going back to archaeological time while
giving the history of the Sivullirmiut (First peoples) and bringing it up to date to the
present time. Other writers include Christine Lalonde, Associate curator of
Indigenous Art at the National Gallery who chronicles the role of the government in
the evolution and influence on Inuit art. Dr. Anupa Pande, Professor and Dean of the
National Museum Institute, takes on the issue of Indigenous Art and Contemporary
45
In 1971, a group of young Inuit leaders formed a national political body called Inuit Tapirisat of Canada
(ITC) - “Inuit will be united in Canada”. The organization played a vital role in securing Aboriginal rights
and recognition in the Canadian Constitution Act, 1982, based on the concept that Inuit are a founding
people of the country, having settled in Canada thousands of years before confederation. In 2001, the
organization changed its name to Inuit Tapirlit Kanatami – “Inuit are united in Canada” – to better reflect
the relationship with today’s government and in celebration of the Inuit political achievement during the
organization’s first thirty years. For further details see the official website of Inuit Tapirlit Kanatami:
https://www.itk.ca/about-itk
46
Mary Simon. “Story of the Changing People,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi:
Creative Offset, 2010), 11.
28
Significations. She examines Indigenous art form as being “enfolded in remarkable
diversity and rich variations.”47
The catalogue describes Inuit legends in the words of the artists, stressing
the oral traditions of the Inuit storytelling. Personal experiences are related in the
first person in the catalogue by the artists, providing their individual voices. As the
exhibition focused on presenting the culture through the narrative of objects, the
catalogue further elaborates on the influences through time, that have led to the
growth of the Inuit art production. The objects chosen for the exhibition
represented a conscious decision to introduce to a new audience the history of Inuit
art, with a critical lens of looking back sixty years. The exhibition and catalogue both
emphasize the significant changes in Inuit history, habitat and world view,
presenting its rich artistic heritage which is not frozen in time. However, excluded
from the visual display of wall texts and the catalogue essay were the social and
economic issues plaguing the Inuit population in Canada and how their artistic
production has contributed to these concerns.
The inaugural program for the opening of Sanaugavut included speeches by
Minister of Culture of India, Shri Jawhar Sircar, and the Canadian High
Commissioner, Jim Nickel, as well as museum directors and curators from Canada
and India. Attended by dignitaries from other consulates, scholars, artists and
members of public, the auditorium was filled to capacity. The commencement of the
proceedings received the appropriate spiritual blessing by the way of an Indian
47
Dr. Anupa Pande. “Indigenous Art and Contemporary Signification,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the
Canadian Arctic (Delhi: Creative Offset, 2010), 125.
29
traditional Lighting of the Lamp ceremony,48 very much in keeping with the spiritual
blessing traditions of Aboriginal communities in Canada.49 Concluding the ceremony
was a message from Inuit artist David Ruben, read by Christine Lalonde, “…it seems
to me that we share interesting things in common, such as in how important
mythology and spirituality are in our lives and how this is revealed in our art.”50 The
inaugural and official opening ceremony of the exhibition was followed by a
reception at Canada House, the official residence of the Canadian High
Commissioner to India. Amongst other guests at the reception, the most notable
were the Canadian athletes, who had just arrived in India to participate in the
Commonwealth Games. Heading the delegation of Canadian athletes was the
Minister of Sport, The Honorable Gary Lunn, who chose to give his first media
conference in Delhi at the National Museum, with Sanaugavut as his backdrop.
As part of the exhibition platform of presenting Canadian content at the
National Museum, an educational component by way of seminars, lecture series and
a course specifically designed by the National Gallery for the National Museum
Institute disseminated information to the public. Educational opportunities were
achieved by an agreement between the National Gallery, the National Museum
48
Lighting of a lamp in Hinduism - Light represents knowledge and darkness represents ignorance. The
Lord himself is the source, the enlivener and enlightener of all knowledge. So the light in the lamp is
worshipped as the Lord himself. For further details see: http://www.mamandram.org/hindu-practices/why-
do-we-light-a-lamp.html
49
“Qulliq”: Inuit Lamp-Lighting Ceremony - A traditional lamp-lighting ceremony is important to the
Inuit culture in offering a space for reflection and communication. It is a ceremony passed from mother to
daughter and emphasizes important messages, such as the following three guiding principles: Always
respect elders and listen to them; Always share when people need it; Always make sure you love people as
you care for yourself. For further details see: Philippe Morin. “Ancestors Light the Way,” Northern News
Services Online. June 4, 2007. http://www.nnsl.com/frames/newspapers/2007-06/jun4_07grd.html
50
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Letter from David Ruben
30
Institute and the university arm of the National Museum. Conveniently located in an
adjoining building to the museum, the institute’s mandate includes teaching the
History of Art, covering ancient and modern, Eastern and Western. An education
officer from the National Gallery provided the Institute with assistance in creating a
course on Inuit art to coincide with the opening of Sanaugavut. 51 Prior to the
opening of the exhibition and the lecture series, an Indo-Canadian Symposium was
organised, titled Indigenous Art Contemporary Signification. The two-day sessions at
the symposium included topics exploring the relationship between Inuit and Indian
tribal art. The symposium’s participants consisted of professors of visual and
performing arts, anthropologists and museologists from a variety of Indian
Universities, curators (Indian and Canadian), the head of advocacy programming
from the Canadian High Commission, Indian artists and research scholars. A
hundred and twenty participants signed up for the seminars. As part of the course
the National Museum Institute organised a special lecture series on the Indigenous
Art of Canada. The lectures were given by Dr. Stephen Inglis, a Canadian
anthropologist and art historian who is familiar with the artistic traditions of the
Indigenous peoples of North America. Amongst other topics explored during Inglis’
lecture series, which focused on the culture and heritage of the Indigenous in the
Canadian Sub- Arctic, the topic “Inuit art: Crafting an Economy”, presented Inuit Art
as a symbol of Canadian nationhood to an international and specifically to the Indian
audience.
51
A complete list of books provided to the National Museum Institute in consultations with “Ingo Hessel
Inuit Art Consulting”. Source: Exhibition files of Sanaugavut.
31
103, 506 visitors attended Sanaugavut during its four-month residency at the
National Museum. This was the greatest amount of people52 to visit a foreign show
in the Museum’s history, indicating its successful reception by the Indian public.
Sanaugavut featured three components that differentiated it from the previous Inuit
art touring exhibitions: the symposium promoting a discussion on Indigenous art;
the inclusion of seminars and a course given on Inuit art at the National Museum of
India; the exhibition catalogue contributing to the scholarship on Inuit art and
providing a vital reference point for all readers. Curator Christine Lalonde highlights
the new developments in contemporary Inuit Art exhibitions and states: “Many of
the high profile exhibitions of Inuit Art in recent years that have focused on
individual contemporary artists…have been crucial to keeping the [Inuit] arts
vital.”53 Sanaugavut combined the chronological evolution of the art form
demonstrating the continuity of medium and subject matter over the first decades of
Inuit Art’s exhibition, with contemporary artworks that are expressions of their own
time. The content of the exhibition: maps, didactic panels, and artworks were a
deliberate and conscious choice to provide a new audience with a history of a people
whose development of art has been continuous and thriving.
The educational component of Sanaugavut was critical, and engaged the
Indian audience, further contextualing the role of cultural exchanges to raise an
interest and broaden the Indian public’s narrow image of Canada as being: “when
52
The comment is from Mr. Vijay Madan, the director of the National Museum of India in an email
exchange with the National Gallery. Source: Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut..
53
Christine Lalonde. “New Directions in Inuit Art Since 2000,” in Creation and Transformation: Defining
Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 180.
32
one thinks of Canada the image of the cosmopolitan Toronto usually springs to
mind.”54 The exhibition and its collateral activities all contributed to the
diplomatic aims of the Canadian government, as such acknowledging the success
of Sanaugavut as a triumphant moment for Canada. However, upon reflection and
given a thorough analysis of the exhibition, there remain some observable
exclusions and unresolved issues that could be viewed as missed opportunities.
For example, there was no Inuit artist present at the exhibition. Time limitations,
budget constraints and logistical problems were some of the reasons cited by the
exhibitions organizers. But, in view of the Canadian government’s attitude of
ignoring the producers of Inuit art, this omission was palpable. This was a
definite missed opportunity, as the presence of an Inuit artist would have
heightened the sense of the Inuit artistic achievement continuing into the
present, and would have furthered the connection with the Indian Indigenous
artists present at the exhibition. Furthermore, as informative as the educational
component of Sanaugavut was, the forum could have taken a lead on an
investigation and a much-needed meaningful discussion into the plight of the
Indigenous peoples in Canada and India. Whereas the role of the artist in the
production of art is visible in Sanaugavut, the treatment and conditions of the
Inuit as a people is not addressed. Through the contemporary work displayed in
Sanaugavut, the Inuit appear to be thriving and expanding their parameters of
54
Ila Sankrityayan. “Vivacity: art and culture”. Tribal art in common Pool (Lucknow: The Pioneer,
October 7, 2010)
33
expression through various mediums, although they are still amongst the most
economically disadvantaged people in the nation.
Section 4: Cultural Exchange and Diplomatic relationship - Canada and India
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Prime Minister Stephen Harper witness the signing
of the Memorandum of Understanding in Toronto55
Although both Canada and India are a part of the Commonwealth,
historically, the two countries have never had strong economic ties. This was largely
due to the deterioration of Indo-Canadian relations caused by India's first nuclear
test in May 1974.56 Canada chose to limit trade and sever bi-lateral nuclear co-
55
India Canada sign Memorandum of Understanding.
http://samrao.com/samraoblogarchivesJulytoDec2010.html. August 20, 2012
56
In April 1956 as part of the Colombo Plan, Canada and India formally sign the Canada-India Reactor
(CIR) Agreement. Canada agrees to provide India with a nuclear reactor (CIRUS) which is to be employed
exclusively for 'peaceful uses.' However, over subsequent years, ample evidence is uncovered that India is
using the reactor to enrich plutonium for its nuclear weapons program. In May 1974 the plutonium fuel
34
operation with India, following allegations that the materials used to construct
India’s first nuclear device had a Canadian supplied nuclear research reactor. The
cooling off period between the two countries lasted into the 1990s. A brief hiatus of
trade co-operation occurred due to economic reforms in India and diplomatic
missions led by Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, yet this was again halted by a second
nuclear test in 1998.57However, the shift in markets and the emergence of India as
well as China as economic power-houses made it once again vital to re-establish
Indo-Canadian relations.58
Sanaugavut’s inception, in 2006, was the result of an organisational venture
between two national art establishments with a mandate to preserve their
countries’ heritage. Getting approval for holding foreign shows at the National
Museum of India is explicitly under the control of the Ministry of Culture of India, as
dictated by the cultural policy of India. Achieving the initial goal of gaining an
audience with the Secretary of the Ministry of Culture of India, it was deemed
imperative that in order to further the project, two representatives from the
National Gallery of Canada would have to travel to India59 to do a site inspection60
used in the nuclear device detonated as part India's nuclear test came from that nuclear reactor, putting into
jeopardy the terms of the Colombo plan. For further details see: Canada-India Bilateral Relationship.
http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/india-inde/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/canada_india-
inde.aspx?view=d.
57
There were no official Federal Governmental visits between Canada and India between 1998 and 2009.
58
Film and TV Stars blast Conservative arts Cuts. http://www.ctvnews.ca/film-and-tv-stars-blast-
conservative-arts-cuts-1.327920, August 20, 2012
59
Karen Stothart (Director of Exhibitions) and Roshi Chadha (Member of the National Gallery of Canada’s
Board of Trustees) travelled to India in September 2006 to conduct a site study, to initiate the dialogue
between the National Gallery and the National Museum and seek approval from the Indian Government.
35
and present the case for the exhibition. The lack of a Memorandum Of
Understanding between India and Canada proved to be a stumbling block and a
challenge in trying to convince the Secretary, The Honorable Jawhar Sircar, to
change his initial emphatic ‘no’ to the project. Detailed presentations ensued,
showcasing the importance of Inuit art in Canada. Seizing on the opportunity and
capitalizing on the preparations for Sanaugavut, and the upcoming meeting of the
Prime Minister of India and Canada at the G-20 Summit in June 2010, the Indian
High Commission in Canada initiated a plan to optimize and cement the Indo-
Canadian relationship by commencing the dialogue to secure a Memorandum Of
Understanding for Culture between the two countries.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper made his first official visit to India in
November 2009,61saying, “This South Asian tiger has awoken and the world is
standing in awe. Facing the greatest global recession in half a century, our two
countries need to work together for our common prosperity.”62 Soon after
Harper’s visit the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh came to Canada in June
2010 for the G20 Summit in Toronto. This was the early stage of engagement
between two countries trying to establish new partnerships. As a result of these
60
Following the site inspection of the National Museum, the content of the exhibition was adjusted due to
climate control capabilities of The National Museum. The Museum’s climate control system did not
conform to the North American museological standards. In order to meet the compliance requirements to
insure the exhibition, sculptural content was increased and prints and textiles were limited.
61
As per Prime Minister Harper’s itinerary officially released by the Canadian government, the visit to
India from November 4 to 9 was his longest official foreign visit since he took office in 2006.
http://pm.gc.ca/eng
62
Canada-India Press Release
http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=5&featureId=6&pageId=48&id=3452. October 20, 2012
36
growing relations a first cultural venture was supported in the exhibition of
Sanaugavut at the National Museum in India.
During their speeches at the G-20 summit, both Prime Ministers welcomed
the signing of the Memorandums of Understanding. The Hindu, an Indian national
news media, gave details of the Memorandums that were signed under the report
titled “Diplomacy and International Relations.”63 The Memorandums included:
Cooperation in Peaceful Uses of Nuclear-Energy; Cooperation in Mining;
Cooperation in Culture;64 Cooperation in Higher Education. In view of the past
breakdown of alliances due to nuclear energy, the signing of the Nuclear
Memorandum of Understanding between Canada and India was a historic
development for both countries, establishing a new era of collaboration.
Following the successful meetings of the Prime Ministers Singh and Harper in
2009 and at the G-20 in June 2010, the first Annual Trade Ministerial Dialogue was
held in Ottawa on 24 September 2010. The Indian Minister of Commerce and
Industry Anand Sharma and the Canadian Minister of International Trade Peter Van
63
The Hindu media Note: Agreement between Indian and Canada for Co-operation
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/media-note-agreement-between-india-and-canada-for-cooperation-
in-peaceful-uses-of-nuclear-energy/article490238.ece. August 12, 2013
64
The India-Canada Memorandum of Understanding on Cultural Cooperation:
1.Will strengthen and promote better mutual understanding in art, literature, history, sports and other
cultural disciplines, and enhance protection and promotion of cultural diversity;
2. Encourage arts and cultural festivals, holding of exhibitions and special events and exchange
programmes, particularly during major international events in both countries;
3. Encourage and facilitate exchanges of professionals/experts, knowledge, technical support and expertise
in Archaeology, Museums, Cinematography, Arts, Libraries, Archives, Mass media, Tourism and
exchanges of exhibitions of artistic, informative, historic and archaeological nature including fine arts,
crafts, photography, new media arts, human and social history and heritage;
4. Share expertise on issues related to creation, production, distribution and dissemination of Indian and
Canadian cultural goods and services, and facilitate participation in cultural and trade events to promote
various cultural goods and services from both countries.
5. Canada will organise an exhibition on ‘Inuit Art’ in the National Museum, New Delhi in 2010. India will
organise a Festival of India in Canada in 2011.
37
Loan welcomed the establishment of a formal discourse and committed to
maintaining open and productive discussions. While reviewing Canada-India
bilateral trade and investment relations, the minister encouraged the continued
strengthening of economic ties between the two countries and reiterated Prime
Minister Harper’s commitment to increase trade from $4.5 billion to $15 billion in
the next five years.65 During the meeting, the Ministers released the Canada-India
Joint Study Group Report that examined the feasibility of a comprehensive economic
partnership.
Reviewing the state of bi-lateral relations, The Ministry of Culture of India
and the Department of Canadian Heritage “welcomed the enhanced interaction in
a broad range of areas, and expressed their desire to broaden and deepen
economic, diplomatic, educational, and cultural ties.”66 With the Memorandum of
Understanding now officially signed on June 27, 2010, Canadian politicians were
happy to announce that as the first positive step, Canadian treasures of Inuit art
were going in an exhibition from Canada to India. Following the G-8 summit,
official media reports referred to Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic
and the Memorandum of Understanding on cultural cooperation between Canada
and India as favourable “initiatives undertaken by the Canadian and Indian
governments to strengthen established cultural ties.”67
65
Canada-India Bilateral Relationship
http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/india-inde/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/canada_india-
inde.aspx?view=d. August 20, 2012
66
Canada-India Press Release
http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=5&featureId=6&pageId=48&id=3452. October 20, 2012
67
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Draft 2 of Question and Answers to the press
38
Canada gained visibility through Sanaugavut at a time when international
attention was directed at India. This visibility underpins Cynthia Schneider’s
definition of cultural diplomacy: an opportunity to foster mutual understanding
by presenting cultural knowledge and furthering an understanding of a nation.
Cultural diplomacy operates through the use of ‘soft power’- its ability to present the
mood of the country, providing an awareness of the characteristics of its societies
and a landscape in which its politics operate. One means of achieving cultural
diplomacy is through exhibitions line Sanaugavut. Additionally, Schneider defines
the difference between public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy: “Cultural
diplomacy differs from its larger relative public diplomacy in that it is less closely
aligned with policy (or promoting the acceptance of policies), and operates best
as a two way street.”68 Public diplomacy is often regarded as the domain of a
country’s foreign policy. Cultural diplomacy becomes an instrument of foreign
policy, broadening the concept of diplomacy as a two way communication
between countries. The potential of cultural diplomacy is its power to create a
kinder, gentler environment within which the harder political activities or actions
of diplomatic relations can be built. Cultural engagements can do the heavy lifting
and provide leverage for inter-governmental negotiations, facilitating public
diplomacy. Although the impact of cultural programs remains abstract, such
activities remain a coherent political strategy in building connections and
breaking down barriers between nations. Jawhar Sircar, Secretary, Ministry of
68
Cynthia P. Schneider. “The Unrealized Potential of Cultural Diplomacy: “Best Practices” and What
Could Be, If Only…,” Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society (Winter 2010): 261.
39
Culture of India, discusses the approach of cultural programs as prongs of
diplomacy in his introductory remarks for Sanaugavut‘s exhibition catalogue.
Indigenous art is a natural outpouring of human experience and such art forms are worthy of preservation, development and encouragement…This exhibition is the first such, after signing the Memorandum of Understanding on Cultural co-operation between India and Canada… I am confident that the exhibition will not only bring the Indigenous artists and the people of both our countries closer but also initiate a wider interaction between these rich and diverse cultures.69
Sircar’s confidence in Sanaugavut as a positive step in cultural diplomacy is
twofold – first as a two way exchange between Canada and India as well as
creating a connection between the Indigenous peoples of both countries. A key
indicator of effective cultural diplomacy in a cultural exchange is the activity’s
capacity to develop connections with the host country. Acknowledging the
presence of Indigenous peoples in Canada and India, with hopes of bringing them
together, Sircar successfully creates a connection between the two countries and
by extension acknowledges the power of the exhibition that brought about this
possibility. Equally important is his integration of the Indigenous artists in his
remarks, lending credibility and an acknowledgement of their distinctive and
personal expression of art.
Sircar’s remarks place Inuit civilization as a crucial part of Canada’s
history, a statement echoed by The Honourable James Moore, Minister of
Canadian Heritage and official Languages, in his introductory remarks in
Sanaugavut’s exhibition catalogue:
69
Jawhar Sircar. “Introductory Remarks,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic (Delhi:
Creative Offset, 2010), 6.
40
The exhibition Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic presents a wonderful opportunity for Canada to share the diversity of Inuit culture with the peoples of India and the world as nations gather in Delhi for the XIX Commonwealth Games. Over the past fifty years, Inuit art has become one of Canada’s symbols at home and abroad. It is fitting that the National Gallery of Canada presents, during this international gathering, an exhibition showcasing the diverse talents of Inuit artists.70
It is noteworthy that Moore supports the use of Inuit Art as a marker of Canada and
acknowledges the long history of the Canadian state using Inuit art to sell itself
internationally. The power of Inuit Art as a marker of Canada’s nationhood is
undiminished in Moore’s comments, despite the gap of fifty years between the
exhibitions Canada Eskimo Art sent in 1956 on a European Tour and Sanaugavut in
2010. In 1956, External Affairs and foreign consular officers, adjuncts in the
promotion of Canada’s public diplomacy, collaborated to send Inuit art exhibitions
from Canada to an international audience. The tour boosted Canada’s cultural
profile on the world stage, achieving the diplomatic agenda of sketching an
impression of Canada as a developed, habitable and prosperous sovereign nation.
Upon receiving positive acclaim for the international exhibitions, the Canadian
government quickly realized the soft power of Inuit Art as a means to promote
Canadian interests abroad, be they economic or political.71 In 2010, James Moore, a
70
The Honourable James Moore. “Introductory Remarks,” in Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian
Arctic (Delhi: Creative Offset, 2010), 6.
71
Reviews of the exhibition ranged from “How modern,” to “in their liveliness…these sculpture show a
close relationship with modern European sculpture”. For further reviews of the exhibition see: Norman
Vorano. “The Globalization of Inuit Art in the 1950s and 1960s,” in Creation and Transformation:
Defining Moments in Inuit Art (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012), 56.
41
senior political Minister of the Canadian government lauded the continued use of
Inuit Art from the National Gallery, a crown corporation of Canada. Moore’s
comments pointed to Inuit culture as an integral part of Canada and thus fitting to
be the first cultural exchange between Canada and India.
Sanaugavut is the most recent in a long line of exhibitions that use
Indigenous art to showcase Canada and other post-colonial nations’ identity. This
idea can also be seen in another exhibition that overlapped with Sanaugavut, Power
Cloths of the Commonwealth. The theme of Power Cloths is textiles, used to convey or
symbolize power. Power Cloths of the Commonwealth, celebrating key moments in
Commonwealth history, was Australia’s contribution to the official Cultural Program
of the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi, and provides an important comparison
with Sanaugavut of the way that exhibitions have been used as tools of cultural
diplomacy
.Section 5: Sanaugavut and Power Cloths – Cultural Diplomacy in action
42
Cover of the catalogue for the Power Cloths exhibition
Canada is one of 54 member states that form the Commonwealth. All
members, except Mozambique and Rwanda, were part of the British Empire, out of
which the Commonwealth developed. The Commonwealth Games, initially known as
the British Empire Games, is a quadrennial sports competition for athletes from the
countries of the British Commonwealth. The first inaugural meeting of the games
was held in 1930 in Hamilton, Ontario.
The exhibition Power Cloths of the Commonwealth was held at the National
Arts and Crafts Museum, New Delhi from September 28, 2010 to October 20, 2010,
Commenting on Sanaugavut and Power Cloths, Ila Sankrityayan, cultural journalist
for the daily newspaper The Pioneer wrote “With the Commonwealth Games having
officially kick-started, the focus is also on the art and culture from the Indigenous
43
artists from a wealth of Commonwealth countries, some of whom are displaying
their works here.”72
Power Cloths’ particular focus was to exhibit ceremonial cloths used by
Indigenous communities from the Commonwealth countries. The production of
Indigenous textiles in Power Cloths can be seen as charged with a discourse of ex-
colonial nations. Suzanne Davies, co-curator of the Power Cloths exhibition, offered
an explanation of ‘power’ and what it means in the context of the exhibition:
‘Power’ may…arise from the spiritual, mystical or symbolic cultural status of the garment or cloth, like the clothing of a shaman…‘Power’ may also arise as a consequence of the significance of the wearer,…or political positions of resistance and independence…73
Jasleen Dhamija, the co-curator of the Power Cloths exhibition and a specialist in the
history of textiles and costumes states: “Fabrics… became a repository of speculative
thought, embodying history in a non-verbal language.”74 . Traditionally, textiles or
clothing is considered as utilitarian object, “functional and therefore outside
Western concepts of artistic expressions.”75 It is thus significant and noteworthy
that the curators of this exhibition used the power of cloths as symbols of their
nation - using textiles as a resource to show the dominance of the colonials over the
Indigenous population. The distinctive notion of power in Power Cloths may also 72
Ila Sankrityayan. “Vivacity: art and culture”. Tribal art in common Pool (Lucknow: The Pioneer,
October 7, 2010)
73
Australian High Commission. http://www.india.embassy.gov.au/ndli/pa5710.html. October 12, 2012
74
Jasleen Dhamija. “The Warp and Weft of the Universe: Threads which unite the world,” in Power Cloths
of the Commonwealth (Melbourne: RMIT Gallery, 2010), 49.
75
Christine Lalonde. “Colonialism Changes Everything,” Inuit Modern, ed. Gerald McMaster (Vancouver:
Douglas & McIntyre, 2011), 28.
44
arise from the spiritual or mystical status of the garment or cloth such as the images
of the “Shaman’s wrapper” from Malaysia or the ceremonial cloths used by
Indigenous communities from Canada, New Zealand and Australia.
The exhibition included examples of distinctive dress choices of major
political figures such as Mahatma Gandhi’s khadi (cloth made from hemp, an
Indigenous plant in India), Nelson Mandela’s shirt with African prints and a Kente
cloth, made by Akam, the Indigenous people of Ghana and worn by Kwame
Nkrumah, the first Head of State of Ghana, as a proud statement of his Ghanaian
identity. Included in the collection was a rare possum skin cloak worn by South-
Eastern Australian Aboriginal elders. William White, a Canadian artist belonging to
the Raven Clan Tsimshian community from northern British Colombia, was present
at the Crafts Museum and participated by bringing two tapestries woven by him and
showed off his skills by demonstrating the specialised weaving techniques of his
ancestors.
Bruce Ferguson defines exhibitions as being “narratives with purposes,
fictions of persuasion, docudramas of influence… (or) infotainment.”76 Sanaugavut
and Power Cloths recount a story of strength and affirmation of peoples, capable of
surviving decades of colonial oppression, while managing to preserve their cultural
knowledge. The artworks of both exhibitions are examples of resiliency in the
Indigenous art practices - the objects confronting the colonial influence while
maintaining their producers’ cultural expression. According to Heather Igloliorte,
76
Bruce W. Ferguson. "Exhibition Rhetorics: Material speech and utter sense,” in Thinking about
exhibitions, eds. Reesa Greenberg, Bruce Ferguson and Sandy Nairne (London: Routledge, 1996), 178.
45
art that expresses cultural resiliency can be seen as a “consolidation and
rejuvenation of Indigenous culture and the assertion of autonomy while providing a
valuable and a nuanced critique of the complex interactions…of colonialism.”77 The
distinctiveness of the artists’ individual style in Sanaugavut augments the belief in
the flourishing Inuit art practice, particularly significant in the face of the oppression
of the Inuit population. The textiles in Power Cloths, although identified as an agency
of autonomy and sovereignty for the ex-colonial nations are in fact dynamic sites of
resistance, for example Mahatma Gandhi’s Khadi cloth, Mandela’s shirt and the
Kente cloth from Ghana.
Because of the strong emphasis on Indigenous cultures in Sanaugavut and
Power Cloths, one can read the exhibitions as reiterating certain assumptions about
the relationship between Indigenous peoples and ex-colonial national identities.
Sanaugavut and Power Cloths are fostering on the world stage a better
understanding of Indigenous art, as well as using the significant arts to build an
iconic distinctiveness for their nation; Canada and the other Commonwealth
countries. Indigenous art is a continuous expression of culture and the people’s
relationship with the land; giving rise to similarities in Sanaugavut and Power Cloths
in that most of the objects provide a commentary on the entangled history of
Indigenous cultures and their colonizers. The question that Sanaugavut and Power
Cloths raise is: what is it about Indigenous art that has made it the carrier of cultural
diplomacy across so many former colonial countries? What makes it so manipulable
77
Heather Igloliorte. “The Inuit of Our Imagination,” in Inuit Modern, ed. Gerald McMaster (Vancouver:
Douglas & McIntyre, 2011), 45.
46
to nationalist desires when its makers are ignored? Canadian novelist, Margaret
Atwood’s book Survival describes a country’s enticement to use Indigenous
emblems as stemming from its pressing need to create an allegiance with the land.
The Indigenous people, Atwood says are “true ancestors…real inhabitants”78 of a
land, who lend authenticity to the construct of a new state. Canadian art historian
Leanne Stewart Pupchek in her essay, “True North: Inuit Art and the Canadian
Imagination,” further extrapolates this alliance as an international search for “the
authentic ‘Folk’… which is a popular search for a link with a living idealized past, a
search for the authenticity that Europeans believed they had lost...”79 Atwood and
Pupchek’s proposal closes the circle with Graburn’s suggestion of Canada’s need to
embrace the “natural” Canadians, seeing in Inuit art their symbols, providing the
nation a firm foothold in the north.
Conclusion: The North and Beyond
Canada’s nationalistic aspirations have made Inuit art as a particularly
effective expression of a national identity. Accepted as fine art, recognized as an
important cultural art form, lent an authenticity by the concept of the “natural” –
firmly places Inuit art in the Canadian and international consciousness as uniquely
Canadian. Pupchek adeptly condenses the past while providing the present-day
78
Leanne Stewart Pupchek cites from Margaret Atwood’s book “Survival: A thematic Guide to Canadian
Literature,” (Toronto: Anansi, 1972). For further details see: Leanne Stewart Pupchek. “True North: Inuit
Art and the Canadian Imagination,” American Review of Canadian Studies (Spring/Summer 2001), 193.
79
For further details see: Leanne Stewart Pupchek. “True North: Inuit Art and the Canadian Imagination,”
American Review of Canadian Studies (Spring/Summer 2001), 197.The discussion is draw from I.
McKay’s essay from The Quest of the Folk: Anti-modernism and Cultural Selection in Twentieth century
Nova Scotia (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1994)
47
pervasive, yet troublesome, use of Inuit art: “Inuit imagery has become a synecdoche
of Canadian identity, [and] may seem problematic in the twenty-first century, not to
mention inauthentic, the acceptance of Inuit art as a marker of Canadian identity
remains popular and unquestioned.”80 It is important to note that while Inuit art
was being used by the Canadian government to improve relations abroad, the Inuit
themselves had limited rights to the control of their land within Canada. The
territory of Nunavut was established after 13 years of intense negotiation which led
to the 1992 Land Claims Agreement, where the Inuit gained title to some land,
monies in compensation, a share of mineral, oil, and gas development, the right to
participate in decisions regarding the land and water resources and rights to
harvest wildlife on their lands.
The reception of Inuit art by the Indian public is documented in the eighty-
eight pages of handwritten reviews81 from the visitors to Sanaugavut. Informed by
Schneider’s definition of cultural diplomacy as a means to foster mutual
understanding and build bridges, the reviews are an insight into how Sanaugavut
provided an expansive image of Canada to the Indian public.82 Sanaugavut’s success
as an instance of cultural diplomacy can also be measured by highlighting some of
the events that have furthered Indo-Canadian relationship. Remarking on the
enhanced ties between the two countries peaking in Seoul at the G20 Summit in
80
Leanne Stewart Pupchek. “True North: Inuit Art and the Canadian Imagination,” American Review of
Canadian Studies (Spring/Summer 2001), 191.
81
Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut.
82
For a complete list of reviews of the exhibitions see: Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut.
48
November 2010, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that the India-Canada
relationship has undergone a “sea-change.”83 Following the signing of the
Memorandum of Understanding of Culture, the Government of India announced
2011 as the Year of India in Canada. Prime Minister Harper stated, “Our country is
home to a vibrant, nearly one-million strong, Indo-Canadian community that plays a
vital role in Canada’s economic and cultural landscape. The Year of India in Canada
represents a unique opportunity to explore Canada’s rich cultural diversity and I
encourage all Canadians to participate in festivities, which will be taking place
across the country.”84 He was joined by Deepak Obhrai, Parliamentary Secretary to
the Minister of Foreign Affairs and host Shashishekhar M. Gavai, High Commissioner
of India to Canada. The inaugural event was followed by a variety of cultural events
in Ottawa and other 14 cities in Canada, garnering visibility for India in Canada and
showcasing economic alliances and potential business opportunities for Canadians
in India.
In 2012, Prime Minister Harper went to India for the second time, following
several key ministers on official visits, which was his longest foreign visit. Prime
Minister Harper announced a cultural Year of Canada in India. Among other Prime
Ministerial objectives, a key aim was to seal a nuclear co-operation agreement,
meant to turn a diplomatic page and triple the annual bilateral trade with India to
$15 billion by 2015. On the cultural side, the National Gallery of Canada has
83
Canada-India Press Release
http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=5&featureId=6&pageId=48&id=3452. October 20, 2012
84
High Commission of India in Ottawa. “Brief on India-Canada Economic &Trade Relations”.
http://www.hciottawa.ca/pdf/Brief%20on%20Trade%20and%20Economic%20Relations.pdf. August 14,
2013
49
included, as part of its exhibition strategy, a commitment to hold an international
survey of Indigenous artists every 5 years. Sakahan: International Indigenous Art
(May 17, 2013 – September 2, 2013), the first show in the series, included tribal
Gond artists from Northern India. Continuing in the promotion of culture, in 2014
the Governor General of Canada, David Johnston, is to visit India, bringing with him
a gift: a monumental Indigenous sculpture, which is to be installed in front of the
Canadian High Commission in New Delhi. This sculpture will be in keeping with
other Inukshuks, given by Canada as a symbol of its nation, as gifts to other
Commonwealth countries; another example of the use of Indigenous culture to
further diplomatic relationships, continuing the tradition of exporting Inuit culture
for political gain.
50
Bibliography
"About ITK." Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. N.p., Web. 7 Jan. 2014. <https://www.itk.ca/about-itk>.
Brief on India-Canada Economic &Trade Relations. High Commission of India in
Ottawa, Aug. 2012. Web. 14 Aug. 2013. <Brief on India-Canada Economic &Trade Relations>.
Library and Archives Canada. Prime Minster St. Laurent’s Letter to Vincent Massey.
Government of Canada. 7 Jan. 2014. <http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/massey/h5-404-e.html>.
"Canada-India Press Release." Official News Prime Minister of Canada Stephen
Harper. PMO, 18 June 2010. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. Davies, Suzanne, and Jasleen Dhamija. "The Warp and Weft of the Universe: Threads
Which Unite the World." Power Cloths of the Commonwealth. Melbourne: RMIT Gallery, 2010. 49-63. Print.
Diubaldo, Richard. "The Government of Canada and the Inuit: 1900-1967." Whither
the Inuit? (1985): 106-188. Print. "Film and TV Stars Blast Conservative Arts Cuts." CTVNews. The Canadian Press, 24
Sept. 2008. Web. 20 Aug. 2012. <http://www.ctvnews.ca/film-and-tv-stars-blast-conservative-arts-cuts-1.327920>.
Goetz, Helga. "Inuit Art: A History of Government Involvement." In the Shadow of the
Sun: Perspectives on Contemporary Native Art. 124th ed. Hull, Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization, 1993. 357-82. Print. Mercury Ser. Paper.
"Government of Canada." Canada-India Relations. Government of Canada, Jan. 2013.
Web. 20 Aug. 2012. <http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/india-inde/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/canada_india-inde.aspx?view=d.>.
Graburn, Nelson. "Inuit Art and Canadian Nationalism: Why Eskimo? Why Canada?"
Inuit Art Quarterly Summer 1.2 (1986): 5-7. Print. Graburn, Nelson. "Inukshuk: Icon of the Inuit of Nunavut." Inuit Studies 28.1 (2004):
69-82. Print. Greenberg, Reesa, Bruce W. Ferguson, and Sandy Nairne. "Exhibition Rhetorics:
Material Speech and Utter Sense." Thinking about Exhibitions. London: Routledge, 1996. 175-90. Print.
51
Harris, Lynden T. "The DEWLINE CHRONICLES." DEWLINE HISTORY. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. <http://www.lswilson.ca/dewhist-a.htm>.
Hessel, Ingo. "Art and Identity." Inuit Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1998. 75-104.
Print. Igloliorte, Heather. "The Inuit of Our Imagination." Ed. Gerald McMaster. Inuit
Modern. ; Art from the Samuel and Esther Sarick Collection. N.p.: Douglas & McIntyre Incorporated, 2010. 41-48. Print.
"India Canada Sign Memorandum of Understanding." Samrao. N.p., 27 June 2010.
Web. 20 Aug. 2012. <http://www.samrao.com/samraoblogarchivesJulytoDec2010.html>.
Kallmann, Helmut. "The Massey Commission." The Canadian Encyclopedia. N.p.: n.p.,
n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013. <http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/emc/massey-commission>.
Lalonde, Christine. "Colonialism Changes Everything." Inuit Modern. ; Art from the
Samuel and Esther Sarick Collection. Ed. Gerald McMaster. N.p.: Douglas & McIntyre Incorporated, 2010. 27-32. Print.
Lalonde, Christine. "New Directions in Inuit Art Since 2000." Creation and
Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art. Winnipeg, Man.: Winnipeg Art Gallery, 2012. 178-205. Print.
Lalonde, Christine. "True North." Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic.
Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 15-28. Print.
Madan, Vijay. Preface. Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic. By Marc Mayer.
Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 7. Print.
Marsh, James, and Jocelyn Harvey. "Cultural Policy." The Canadian Encyclopedia.
Ottawa: Historica Foundation of Canada, 2013. Web. "Media Note: Agreement between India and Canada for Co-operation in Peaceful
Uses of Nuclear Energy." The Hindu. N.p., 27 June 2010. Web. 12 Aug. 2013. Mitchell, Marybelle. "From Talking Chiefs to a Native Corporate Elite." rom a in
C ie s to a ati e Cor orate ite e irt o C ass and ationa ism amon Canadian Inuit. Montreal: McGill-Queen's UP, 1996. Print.
Moore, The Honourable James. Introductory Remarks. Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from
the Canadian Arctic. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 6. Print.
52
Morin, Philippe. "Ancestors Light the Way." Ancestors Light the Way. Northern News Services Online, 4 June 2007. Web. 7 Jan. 2014.
<http://www.nnsl.com/frames/newspapers/2007-06/jun4_07grd.html>. Mosquera, Gerardo. "Some Problems in Transcultural Curating." Global Visions:
Towards a New Internationalism in the Visual Arts. Ed. Jean Fisher. London: Kala in Association with the Institute of International Visual Arts, 1994. 133-139. Print.
"National Gallery of Canada." Millennium Web Catalog. National Gallery of Canada,
n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. <http://bibcat.gallery.ca/search>. Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public
Affairs, 2004. Print. PA57/10. "Spectacular Textiles of the Commonwealth Showcased in Landmark
Delhi Exhibition - Australian High Commission." Spectacular Textiles of the Commonwealth Showcased in Landmark Delhi Exhibition - Australian High Commission. Australian High Commission in India, 25 Sept. 2010. Web. 12 Oct. 2012.
Pande, Anupa Dr. "Indigenous Art and Contemporary Signification." Sanaugavut:
Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 125-127. Print.
PMO. "Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper." Official News. Government of
Canada, n.d. Web. 7 Jan. 2014. <http://pm.gc.ca/eng>. Potter, Kristin. "James Houston, Armchair Tourism, and the Marketing of Inuit Art."
Native American Art in the Twentieth Century. Ed. W. Jackson. Rushing. London: Routledge, 1999. 39-56. Print.
"Prime Minister of Canada-Itinerary Stephen Harper." Home. Government of Canada,
n.d. Web. 7 Jan. 2014. <http://pm.gc.ca/eng>. Pupchek, Leanne Stuart. "True North: Inuit Art and the Canadian Imagination."
American Review of Canadian Studies 31.1-2 (2001): 191-208. Print. Sankrityayan, Ila. "Vivacity: Art and Culture." Editorial. Tribal Art in a Pool [New
Delhi] 7 Oct. 2010, Entertainment sec. Print. Schneider, Cynthia P. "The Unrealized Potential of Cultural Diplomacy: “Best
Practices” and What Could Be, If Only…." Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society Winter 39.4 (2010): 260-79. Print.
53
Simon, Mary. "Story of the Changing People." Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 11-15. Print.
Sircar, Jawahar. Introductory Remarks. Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian Arctic. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada, 2010. 6. Print.
Vorano, Norman David. "The Globalization of Inuit Art in the 1950s and 1960s."
Creation and Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre Incorporated, 2012. 48-57. Print.
Vorano, Norman David. Inuit Art in the Qallunaat World: Modernism, Museums Amd
the Popular Imaginary, 1949-1962. PhD Thesis. Rochester: University of Rochester, 2007. Print.
"Why Do We Light a Lamp? | Hindu Practices." Why Do We Light a Lamp? | Hindu
Practices. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Jan. 2014. <http://www.mamandram.org/hindu-practices/why-do-we-light-a-lamp.html>.
Wight, Darlene Coward. "Birth of an Art Form: 1949 to 1959." Creation and
Transformation: Defining Moments in Inuit Art. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2012. 18-47. Print.
The Exhibition Files of Sanaugavut: Inuit Art from the Canadian North can be located
at: Library and Archives National Gallery of Canada.