Post on 24-Jan-2017
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Introduction to Criminal Justice,McKenzie Wood
Fagin, CJ2015
Chapter 13: The Juvenile Justice System
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.1
13.2
13.3
13.4
Identify the foundations of the juvenile justice system.
Summarize the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system
and the classification of juvenile offenders.
Explain how landmark court cases have influenced the due
process rights of juveniles.
Summarize why and in what ways states are changing the
age of accountability.
13.5Describe the juvenile justice system, including post-adjudications options for treatment and punishment
of juveniles.
CHAPTER OUTCOMES
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.6
13.7
13.8
Summarize the contributions of research and theory tounderstanding the causes of juvenile delinquency andoffending, including youth gangs and substance abuse.
Identify the challenges of preventing school violence and
bullying and strategies that have been used to respond to
this problem.Describe the role of the juvenile justice system in
protectingjuveniles from abuse and victimization.
CHAPTER OUTCOMES
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.1 Identify the foundations of the juvenile justice system.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Foundations of Juvenile Justice13.1
• Juvenile cases were fairly rare in the founding years of the U.S.
• However, as industrialism and immigration gave rise to swelling populations in cities such as New York and Philadelphia, the public began to see a problem with the "disorderly conduct" of children that was not being contained by parents.
• In a society that had no social safety net to provide for people in need, institutions of confinement often housed all "offenders" together without regard for offense, age, or gender.
• The foundation of the various reform movements was society's acceptance of the premise that there are significant and fundamental differences between adults and juveniles.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
New York House of Refuge13.1
• In the early 1800s, various private reform groups provided services to divert young offenders and remove juveniles in need from the criminal justice system.
• The New York House of Refuge was the first privately managed and funded home but it was endorsed and financially supported by the state of New York.
• Children were separated by gender and the main focus was on education, labor, and discipline to reform them.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
New York House of Refuge13.1
•The New York House of Refuge had the authority to place those under its charge in private industry through indenture agreements by which employers agreed to supervise the youths in exchange for their labor.
•Other states followed the New York model for juvenile offenders.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.2Summarize the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system and the classification of juvenile offenders.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Justice System13.2
• Toward the end of the nineteenth century, the concept of parens patriae , or "state as parent and guardian," began to become the predominant theme in structuring state agencies responsible for juveniles.
• Illinois was the first state to use the concept of original jurisdiction, the concept that because juvenile court is the only court that has authority over juveniles, they cannot be tried (for any offense) by a criminal court unless the juvenile court grants permission for an accused juvenile to be waived to criminal court.
• Waiving is granting permission for an accused juvenile to be moved from juvenile court to criminal court.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Justice System13.2
•The juvenile court was self-contained and had its own probation and parole system and its own correctional system.
•By 1910, 32 states had established juvenile courts and/or probation services.
•The juvenile court removed the child from the authority of the criminal court, but it also assumed greater authority over the child than the criminal court had over accused adults.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Justice System13.2
•The juvenile court assumed authority over children in three situations:
1. When the welfare of the child was threatened2. When the child was a status offender3. When the child was a delinquent
•Juveniles who committed offenses were classified as status offenders or delinquents.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Two Types of Juvenile Offenders13.2
Status Offenders
•Children who have committed an act or failed to fulfill a responsibility for which, if they were adults, the court would not have any authority over them•Offenses include running away, smoking, drinking alcohol
Delinquents
•Accused of committing an act that is criminal for both adults and juveniles•Crimes are not divided between felony and misdemeanors
vs.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Juvenile Superpredator13.2
A term used by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention to describe a juvenile who commits violent felony crimes.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.3Explain how landmark court cases have influenced the due process rights of juveniles.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Due Process for Juveniles13.3
• In the beginning, unlike the criminal justice system, neither state supreme courts nor the U.S. Supreme Court provided significant review and oversight of juvenile justice courts.
• From the beginning, some were critical of the lack of due process based on the assumption of the benevolent nature of the juvenile court.
• Although there were some abuses of due process, many of the juvenile courts did operate with the intent to promote the best interests of the child.
• During the 1960s, the U.S. Supreme Court abandoned its hands-off doctrine and began to examine the need for due process rights for juveniles.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Due Process for Juveniles13.3
Kent v. United States
(1966)In re Gault
(1967)In re Winship
(1970)
A Supreme Court case that marked the departure of
the Supreme Court from its
acceptance of the denial of due
process rights to juveniles.
A case in which the Supreme
Court provided due process rights
to juveniles, including
notice of charges, counsel, right to
examine witnesses, and right to remain
silent.
A case in whichthe Supreme
Court ruled that the
reasonable doubt standard, the same used in criminal trials,
should be required in all delinquency
adjudications.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Due Process for Juveniles13.3
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
(1971)
Breed v. Jones(1975)
Schall v. Martin(1970)
A case in which the Supreme Court denied
juveniles the right to a trial by jury.
A case in whichthe Supreme
Court ruled that once a juvenile
has been adjudicated by a juvenile court, he or she cannot be
waived to criminal court to be tried
for the same charges.
A case in whichthe Supreme
Court upheld the right of juvenile courts to deny
bail to adjudicated juveniles.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Separation of Juveniles and Adults13.3
• Due process rights for juveniles are extensively influenced by the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA), amended in 2001.
• The act provides the major source of federal funding to states for the improvement of their juvenile justice systems, services, and facilities.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Separation of Juveniles and Adults13.3
• The provisions of the JJDPA provide that juveniles may not be detained in adult jails and lockups except for limited times before or after a court hearing.
• When children are placed in an adult jail or lockup, except as provided by the exceptions in the JJDPA, "sight and sound" separation is required between adults and juveniles to keep children safe from verbal or psychological abuse that could occur from being within sight or sound of adult inmates.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.4Summarize why and in what ways states are changing the age of accountability.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
The Juvenile Waiver13.4
• The U.S. Supreme Court has declared that the rights in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments are not restricted by age or the professed intent of the court to "help" the child.
• Juvenile offending peaked in the mid-1990s with about 2.9 million arrests of teenagers younger than 18.
• The public perception of the threat from juvenile crime has continued to exert pressure on the juvenile justice system to change its focus from rehabilitation to punishment.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
The Juvenile Waiver13.4
• Spurred by public concern over violent juvenile crimes, states have abandoned the "great experiment" that juveniles were not responsible for the crimes they commit and have changed the provisions for transferring juveniles to the criminal court.
• The age at which a juvenile has the necessary maturity to form criminal intent and be fully accountable for his or her crime has not been resolved by researchers or state law and varies from state to state.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
The Juvenile Waiver13.4
• Each state has its own name for the process of moving the juvenile from the authority of the juvenile court to the adult criminal justice system.
• Common terms for the process include judicial waiver, certification, remand, bind over for criminal prosecution, transfer, and decline (when waiver is denied).
• Some states have established waiver criteria based on the offense independent of the age of the accused offender.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
The Juvenile Waiver13.4
Statutory Exclusion
The provision that allows juveniles to be transferredto criminal court without
review by and approval of the juvenile court.
Blended Sentencing Option
An option that allows the juvenile or criminal court to impose a sentence that can
include confinement in a juvenile facility and/or in an
adult prison after the offender is beyond the age
of the juvenile court's jurisdiction.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.5Describe the juvenile justice system, including post-adjudication options for treatment and punishmentof juveniles.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Processing In The Juvenile Justice System13.5
• Although U.S. Supreme Court decisions have provided more commonality in the due process rights of juveniles, the actual processing, the agencies, and the personnel involved in moving a juvenile from intake to rehabilitation differs from state to state.
• In a sense, there is no single juvenile justice system, but a collection of juvenile justice systems.
• How juveniles are processed through the system depends on the state and sometimes the geographical region of the state in which the juvenile court is located.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Three Models of Classifications13.5
Centralized Decentralized Combination
Characterized by a state executive
agency having across-the-board state control of
delinquencyservices,
including state-run juvenile probation services,
institutionalcommitments, and aftercare
Characterized by local control of
the various juvenile services, such as juvenile
courts,child welfare agencies, and
aftercare services
The organization of the juvenile
system is a mixture of state-controlled and
locallyoperated juvenile
services
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Detentionand
Probation
The Juvenile Justice System13.5
Adjudication
FormalProcessin
g
JuvenileIntake Officer
Adult orJuvenileJurisdicti
onIntake
Processing the offender
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Processing in the Juvenile Justice System13.5
• The intake officer will take a life history, which is an assessment by the juvenile intake/probation officer of the juvenile and his or her past behavior, living conditions, parents/guardians, and school behavior.
• If possible, in lieu of further processing, the juvenile intake officer will refer the juvenile and/or parent(s) or guardian to mental health care, a welfare agency, a diversion program, a counseling program, a school program, or a similar alternative.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Processing in the Juvenile Justice System13.5
• If the intake officer handles the case informally, they will place conditions on the juvenile and the juvenile intake officer will commit these conditions to writing, specify the time frame, and obtain the agreement of the child and/or parent(s) or guardian. These conditions are generally called a consent decree.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Formal Processing of the Juvenile13.5
• Once the case is referred to the juvenile court for formal processing, known as a juvenile adjudication hearing, the juvenile judge becomes the central figure in determining how the case is to be processed.
• If the juvenile intake officer deems a formal hearing appropriate, a delinquency petition or waiver petition is forwarded to the juvenile court judge.
• Unlike adult criminal trials that are rigorously scripted as to form and procedure, there is more leeway in juvenile adjudication hearings.
• The court decides if it is legal and appropriate to the adult court. An alternative to formal processing by the juvenile court is to refer the juvenile to an alternative court, such as teen court or drug court.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Detention and Aftercare13.5
• When a juvenile is adjudicated and his or her petition is sustained, the judge then decides whether the delinquent youth should become a ward of the state and be placed in a residential facility or enter a course of rehabilitation such as drug or alcohol counseling, restitution, or community service.
• If the juvenile is declared a ward of the state, it means that the state exercises its right of parens patriae and assumes primary responsibility for the health and well-being of the child.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Detention and Aftercare13.5
• The court can place the juvenile in the following:
1. Residential placement – which have levels of security
2. Foster Care – removal from the home3. Juvenile probation – also called "aftercare"4. Juvenile Boot Camps – Similar to adult camps5. Private Boot Camps – offer a variety of
settings such as wilderness, at sea, and military-style camps
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Landmark Juvenile Death Penalty Cases13.5
Thompson v. Oklahoma
Roper, Superintendent
, PotosiCorrectional
Center v.Simmons
Graham v. Florida
Miller v. Alabama
The Supreme Court ruled that
national standards of
decency did notpermit the
execution of any offender under age 16 at the time of the
crime.
A case in whichthe Supreme
Court held thatthe Eighth and
FourteenthAmendments
forbid impositionof the death penalty on offenders
who were under the age of 18
when their crimes were committed.
A case inwhich the U.S. Supreme Court
held that juveniles tried
asadults cannot
be sentenced tolife in prison
without parole for nonhomicide
offenses.
A case inwhich the U.S. Supreme Courtextends the ban on sentences of
life without parole for
juveniles guilty of homicide
offenses.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.6
Summarize the contributions of research and theory to understanding the causes of juvenile delinquency and offending, including youth gangs and substance abuse.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Sociological Explanations13.6
In general, sociological research and theories focusing on juveniles attempts to identify the following:
• When children first start offending• What influences their decision• What reinforces delinquent behavior• What is the impact of influences such as social
norms, school, culture, self-image, and parenting on juvenile behavior
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Sociological Explanations13.6
•Many of the researchers whose theories have been helpful in the clarification of juvenile delinquency tended to focus their research on delinquency in school-aged children.
•Recent research has suggested that the origins of serious and violent juvenile criminality (and later adult criminality) may be found in risk factors that begin early in life.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Sociological Explanations13.6
In 1998, the OJJDP formed a Study Group on Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders. The Study Group reported the following: •There is a significant relationship between delinquency and persistent disruptive behavior as a young child.•Behavior and influences that place a child at risk for an early career of disruptive behavior and child delinquency can be identified as early as two years of age and include many factors that have been identified by the more popular criminological theories of crime causation.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Sociological Explanations13.6
•In a later study, the major finding was that "incarceration may not be the most appropriate or effective option, even for many of the most serious adolescent offenders."
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Youth Gangs13.6
• Youth gangs are difficult-to-define juvenile groups distinct from adult gangs that mimic adult gangs and are significant sources of criminal activity and violence.
• According to a review of the research data by the OJJDP, historically gang members have been primarily young adult males from homogeneous lower-class, inner-city ghetto, or barrio neighborhoods.
• There has been a large increase in female gangs in recent years.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Youth Gangs13.6
Hybrid gangs are a new type of youth gang with distinctive characteristics that differentiate them from traditional gangs. Compared with traditional gangs, they are:
• Frequently school-based• Less organized• Less involved in criminal activity• Less involved in violence
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Hybrid Gangs13.6
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Juvenile Substance Abuse13.6
• Drug use and addiction are a serious problem in the U.S. and juvenile drug use is a serious problem as well. Various educational programs and initiatives have been created to deal with the problem.
• Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) - A popular in-school antidrug program initiated by the Los Angeles Police Department in 1983 but abandoned when data failed to support its effectiveness.
• There are indicators that juvenile drug use is increasing in some niches.
• Marijuana, prescription drugs, and over-the-counter medications are the most abused drugs used by juveniles.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.7Identify the challenges of preventing school violence and bullying and strategies that have been used to respond to this problem.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Schools and Juvenile Violence13.7
• Today, school violence is a major concern of society with the recent incidents of school shootings in the last several years.
• The fear and reaction to school violence may be due in part to the media coverage of such incidents and to the historical expectation of relative safety that has characterized schools.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Schools and Juvenile Violence13.7
• Bullying is making physical and/or psychological threats or abusing or tormenting another person. A large focus to today is on reducing bullying in schools.
• Schools have now been taking a zero tolerance policy which is school disciplinary policies that provide for mandatory disciplinary actions for any and all violations of school rules regardless of the student or circumstance.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Police Response to School Violence13.7
Contain and WaitA law enforcement
strategy for responding to shootings at schools and
colleges in which perimeter security is established and law enforcement officers
negotiate with the shooter.This was the strategy prior
to the Columbine High School Shooting.
Active ShooterA law enforcement
strategy for responding to shootings at schools and colleges in which the first officers on the scene seek and find the shooter and
neutralize him or her. This is the recommended
strategy today.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Strategies to Prevent School Violence13.7
Bans on cellphones
Zero tolerance policies
Reduce bullying
Police officers
in schools
Transfertroublemakers
to juvenilecourts
Expanded use of
expulsion
Increased security measures
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.8Describe the role of the juvenile justice system in protecting juveniles from abuse and victimization.
Learning ObjectiveAfter this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
The Juvenile as a Victim13.8
While law enforcement and the criminal justice system play an important role in protecting children from victimization and promoting the health and welfare of children, other agencies often are central to protecting children from victimization and harm.
•Child protective services (CPS) is a government agency responsible for the health and welfare of children.
•CPS officers are social welfare workers, but they must work closely with law enforcement, as many incidents that threaten the welfare of the child are violations of the law.
•Certain crimes such as sexual intercourse by adults with underage juveniles may be designed as a strict liability crime, which does not require the prosecutor to prove mens rea, or criminal intent, by the perpetrator.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Laws to Protect Children13.8
Federal Kidnapping
Act(Lindbergh
Law)
1996 Federal
Sex Offender Registry
Amber AlertSystem
Caylee's Law
An act that made it a
federal offense to transport a
kidnapping victim across state lines.
A database of convicted sexoffenders who are required toregister with
law enforcement.
The registration data is
available to the public.
A system that provides law enforcement
with the ability to notify the public of a missing or
abducted childthrough media, technology, andsocial networks.
A law that requires
parents and/or guardians to
reporting missing
children in atimely manner.
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
In the early 1800s, private reform groups attempted to divert young offenders from the criminal justice system. By the mid-1800s, private institutions had
increased in major cities but could not provide adequate services. Eventually, many states found it
necessary to assume control over the various private juvenile reformatories to provide greater financial
support and oversight.
The first juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois, in 1899. The juvenile court was
established not as a criminal court, but as a government agency to provide youthful offenders with
a comprehensive and balanced approach to rehabilitation. More focus is placed on the best
interests of the child.
13.1
13.2
CHAPTER SUMMARY
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
Not until the 1960s did the Supreme Court abandon its hands-off approach to juvenile cases and become more
concerned with examining the need for due process rights for juveniles. The Supreme Court made
significant changes to the very nature of the juvenile justice system, declaring that juveniles do have due
process rights.
13.3
CHAPTER SUMMARY
The age at which a juvenile can be fully accountable for a crime varies by state. Some states have a
statutory exclusion provision that allows transferring juveniles to criminal court without review by and
approval of the juvenile court. A majority of states have adopted statutory exclusion and exclude certain
serious offenses from juvenile court jurisdiction,such as homicide and other serious crimes against
persons.
13.4
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
13.5
A juvenile intake officer interviews the child and the parent(s) or guardian and gathers a life history of the
child. If a case is referred to the juvenile court for formal processing, it is called a juvenile adjudication hearing. A delinquency petition asks a judge to hear the case in a formal hearing and determine whether
the juvenile is delinquent
Sociological research and theories focus on what influences a juvenile's decision to choose delinquent behavior. Many researchers are especially interested in youth gangs. An interesting emergence has been
hybrid youth gangs. Another area of interest involves female gangs. Juvenile drug use also is a serious
problem, as there appears to be a strong link between substance abuse and delinquent behavior.
13.6
CHAPTER SUMMARY
CJ2015James A. Fagin
Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.All Rights Reserved
School violence is a major concern of society. The fear and reaction to school violence may be due in
part to the media coverage of school shootings. School shootings, nonfatal violence, and crime have resulted in significant changes in security. Schools
have adopted the use of metaldetector screening and zero-tolerance policies
prohibiting weapons. Reducing school bullying is another challenge for school administrators in
seeking to reduce violence.
The juvenile justice system is concerned about children who are victims of crime and about the health and welfare of children. A social service
agency that focuses primarily on the welfare of the child is child protective services (CPS). Three major concerns of the criminal justice system in protecting
youth are violence against children, sexual exploitation of children, and missing children.
13.7
13.8
CHAPTER SUMMARY