Interactions between teaching assistants and students boost engagement in physics labs

Post on 18-Dec-2014

196 views 0 download

description

Given November 1, 2013 in the Graduate Student Seminar Series in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of British Columbia.

Transcript of Interactions between teaching assistants and students boost engagement in physics labs

Interactions between teaching assistants and students boost engagement in physics labs

Jared Stang @StangJared, jaredstang.wordpress.com

with Ido Roll, arXiv:1306.6606 [physics.ed-ph]

TAs Students

Context Friends

Prof

Background

TAs Students

Context Friends

Prof

Background

What do you do as a TA that helps students learn?

1. Write down your ideas (one per piece of paper)

2. Crumple up the paper and throw it up here

The research question:

Which of these actually matter?

Our answer:

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Interactions per minute

Fractionalstudentengagement

The frequency of TA-student interactions matters!

The TA-student relationship

TAs Students

The TA-student relationship

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

The TA-student relationship

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

Which of these actually matter?

The TA-student relationship

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

?

?

Which TA behaviours contribute to student engagement and learning?

Which of these actually matter?

The TA-student relationship

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

?

?

?

Which TA behaviours contribute to student engagement and learning?

Which of these actually matter?

Design: Observe then correlate

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

?

?

?

Observe

Observe

Skills test

Observe all lab sections in the same week.

Setting: Physics 100 lab

•  Large class: ~700 students in 16 lab sections

•  Weekly 1.5 hour lab with 2 TAs

•  Average of 39 students per lab section

Lab progression Intro and clicker questions

Extended period of students working in pairs (Observations during this period) Outro and clicker questions

Participants: The TAs of Phys 100

•  6 first-year grad students with no prior teaching experience

TA observations

•  How do TAs adhere to and deliver the lesson plan? 1.  Note TA behaviours outside of the standard script

•  Examples: Using the chalkboard to discuss a point, playing music from YouTube, having a back-and-forth with TA partner during a class discussion

•  How do TAs interact with students during the work session? 2.  Number of TA-student interactions 3.  Who initiates the interactions? 4.  Length of interactions

TA observation form allows one to record a timeline of TA’s behaviour during the lab

TA teaching style and behaviors

Observe

TA observation formObserver: Ú6i_.^ È¿.\,r-¡,J section: L I a Date: ô"\. j j/¿

, ¿ T¡,'r1s. :i ) _

Lab progression key:1. Before TA begins class2. Going over homework3. I ntrod uction4. 1st group of clicker questionsJ. J LUUeI LS WOTK|ng6. Testing predictions7. 2nd grcup of clicker questionsL Other(Please mark lab end)

'yr1'.t

L{:rl.¿ ¿d

lq.l!-;.--)li i,-i

*' r 4'L 3

i. t 'lt-'-oY1'---'l!ç

^! ,. l"n-l1/'

t, ,\; . .-.,,...- , "j..t- :.¡ :."...-:

TA observation form

1.  Note off-script TA behaviours 2.  Number of TA-student interactions 3.  Who initiates the interactions? 4.  Length of interactions

TA observation formObserver: Ú6i_.^ È¿.\,r-¡,J section: L I a Date: ô"\. j j/¿

, ¿ T¡,'r1s. :i ) _

Lab progression key:1. Before TA begins class2. Going over homework3. I ntrod uction4. 1st group of clicker questionsJ. J LUUeI LS WOTK|ng6. Testing predictions7. 2nd grcup of clicker questionsL Other(Please mark lab end)

'yr1'.t

L{:rl.¿ ¿d

lq.l!-;.--)li i,-i

*' r 4'L 3

i. t 'lt-'-oY1'---'l!ç

^! ,. l"n-l1/'

t, ,\; . .-.,,...- , "j..t- :.¡ :."...-:

TA observation form 1. Off-script behaviour

1.  Note off-script TA behaviours 2.  Number of TA-student interactions 3.  Who initiates the interactions? 4.  Length of interactions

TA observation formObserver: Ú6i_.^ È¿.\,r-¡,J section: L I a Date: ô"\. j j/¿

, ¿ T¡,'r1s. :i ) _

Lab progression key:1. Before TA begins class2. Going over homework3. I ntrod uction4. 1st group of clicker questionsJ. J LUUeI LS WOTK|ng6. Testing predictions7. 2nd grcup of clicker questionsL Other(Please mark lab end)

'yr1'.t

L{:rl.¿ ¿d

lq.l!-;.--)li i,-i

*' r 4'L 3

i. t 'lt-'-oY1'---'l!ç

^! ,. l"n-l1/'

t, ,\; . .-.,,...- , "j..t- :.¡ :."...-:

TA observation form

2-4. Interactions

1. Off-script behaviour

1.  Note off-script TA behaviours 2.  Number of TA-student interactions 3.  Who initiates the interactions? 4.  Length of interactions

•  At a glance, place a check/’x’ on classroom map if student is on/off task

•  Completed at intervals of 10 minutes

On/off&task&observa/on&form&Observer:&Sec/on:&Date:&Time:&

Front&

Key:&&&;&On&task&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&;&/me:&&&&&&&&&&min&&&&&&&&&&&;&Off&task&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&;&/me:&&&&&&&&&&min&&&&&&&&&&z&&&;&Zoned&out&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&;&/me:&&&&&&&&&&min&& &;&No&student&Student

engagement

Observe

Measuring student learning

Student learning

Skills test

Test given pre and post.

The model (again)

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

?

?

?

Observe

Observe

Skills test

Student engagement Student learning 1. Off-script TA behaviours -0.11 2. Frequency of ints 0.52 0.28* 3. TA-initiated interactions 0.49 3. Student-initiated ints 0.052 4. Ratio of short to long ints -0.10 Student engagement 0.56*

Results: Correlations

* Denotes partial correlation, controlling for pre-test.

Student engagement Student learning 1. Off-script TA behaviours -0.11 2. Frequency of ints 0.52 0.28* 3. TA-initiated interactions 0.49 3. Student-initiated ints 0.052 4. Ratio of short to long ints -0.10 Student engagement 0.56*

Results: Correlations

* Denotes partial correlation, controlling for pre-test.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Interactions per minute

Fractionalstudentengagement

The frequency of TA-student interactions matters!

Results

Results

Student learning

TA teaching style and behaviors

TA attitudes and beliefs

Student engagement

Which TA behaviours contribute to student engagement and learning?

r = 0.56*

r = 0.52

r = 0.28*

(Frequency of interactions used for TA behaviours)

Discussion

•  Frequency of interactions is correlated with engagement – Whether it’s a carrot or a stick

•  Our opinion: frequent interactions (even just saying ‘hi’) allow and encourage student access to the TA – Be present in the room

(Student)

Discussion: 3 possible TA styles

As a lecture TA, I could: 1. Wait until a student puts up their hand. 2. Approach a single student, ask how they

are doing. 3. Ask an entire section of students how

they are doing.

Conclusions

1.

2. What TAs do in class matters.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Interactions per minute

Fractionalstudentengagement

(Be present in the room.)