Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles with neutrino...

Post on 27-Jul-2020

0 views 0 download

Transcript of Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles with neutrino...

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions

Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles with

neutrino telescopes

Jairo C. de Souza

University of Sao Paulo – Brazil

TeVPA 2010

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 1

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Starting point:

Neutrino Telescopes as a Direct Probe of Supersymmetry Breaking,Ivone. F. M. Albuquerque, Gustavo Burdman and Z. Chacko, PhysicalReview Letters, 92, 221802 (2004);

Direct detection of supersymmetric particles in neutrino telescopes, Ivone.F. M. Albuquerque, Gustavo Burdman and Z. Chacko, Physical Review D75, 035006 (2007);

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 2

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Starting point:

Neutrino Telescopes as a Direct Probe of Supersymmetry Breaking,Ivone. F. M. Albuquerque, Gustavo Burdman and Z. Chacko, PhysicalReview Letters, 92, 221802 (2004);

Direct detection of supersymmetric particles in neutrino telescopes, Ivone.F. M. Albuquerque, Gustavo Burdman and Z. Chacko, Physical Review D75, 035006 (2007);

Goal

Extend the results for a complementary Supersymmetry Breaking Energy Scale:

107GeV .√F . 1010GeV −→ 105GeV .

√F . 107GeV

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 2

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Outline

Theoretical context;

Interactions – cross sections, energy loss and ν flux;

What was already done – study of the direct detection of the NLSPssignals;

What is new – study of the indirect detection of the NLSPs signals.

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 3

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Introduction

Weak scale supersymmetry (SUSY) as an extension of the StandardModel of particle physics;

R-parity → neutral and stablelightest supersymmetric particle (LSP);

The supersymmetry must be broken →√F :

If√F . 1010GeV → Gravitino LSP;

If√F & 1010GeV → Neutralino LSP.

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 4

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Processes that have to be considered:

νN → lLq

lLq promptly decay to 2lR + SM particles

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 5

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Processes that have to be considered:

νN → lLq

lLq promptly decay to 2lR + SM particles

lR : typically the τR → Next to lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP);

τR lifetime can be very large → can travel very long distances beforedecaying:

cτ =( √

F

107GeV

)4 (100GeVmτR

)5

10 km

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 5

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Particle Physics Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Gravitino LSP Scenarios

Processes that have to be considered:

νN → lLq

lLq promptly decay to 2lR + SM particles

lR : typically the τR → Next to lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP);

τR lifetime can be very large → can travel very long distances beforedecaying:

cτ =( √

F

107GeV

)4 (100GeVmτR

)5

10 km

107GeV .√F . 1010GeV ⇒ direct detection (τR doesn’t decay inside

the Earth);

105GeV .√F . 107GeV ⇒ indirect detection (τR decays inside the

Earth).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 5

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Cross-sections Energy loss ν Flux

ν-nucleon cross-sections

10-36

10-35

10-34

10-33

10-32

106

107

108

109

1010

1011

Eν (GeV)

σ (c

m2 )

The three lower curves correspond to mℓL

= 250 GeV, mw = 250GeV; and for squark masses mq = 300 GeV

(dashed) , 600 GeV (dot-dashed) and 900 GeV (dotted). The top curve corresponds to the SM charged currentinteractions and the middle one to the di-muon background.

Figure: I. F. M. Albuquerque, et al, Physical Review D 75, 035006 (2007).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 6

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Cross-sections Energy loss ν Flux

Energy loss for muon and stau

Three main contributions – bremsstrahlung, pair production and photonuclear

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

x 10-5

104

105

106

107

108

109

pair

Eµ (GeV)

b (c

m2 /g

)

bremph nuc

10-13

10-12

10-11

10-10

10-9

10-8

10-7

106

107

108

109

1010

1011

pair

Estau (GeV)

b (c

m2 /g

)

bremph nuc

Figures: M. H. Reno, I. Sarcevic and S. Su, Astroparticle Physics 24, 107 (2005); Ivone F. M. Albuquerque, et al,

Physical Review D 75, 035006 (2007).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 7

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Cross-sections Energy loss ν Flux

Neutrino flux

Waxman and Bahcall (WB) limit – the

observed cosmic ray flux implies an upper

bound on the high energy astrophysical

neutrino flux.

(

dφν

dE

)

WB= (1−4)×10−8

E2

GeV cm−2s−1 sr−1

Mannheim, Protheroe and Rachen (MPR)

limit – upper limit on the diffuse neutrino

sources.

10-18

10-17

10-16

10-15

10-14

10-13

105

106

107

108

109

1010

1011

Eν (GeV)

E d

Φν/

dE (

cm-2

s-1sr

-1)

WB limit

MPR limit (transparent sources)

MPR limit (opaque sources)

Figure: I. F. M. Albuquerque et al, arXiv:0803.3479v1[hep-ph]

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 8

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Energy spectrum Track separation

Direct detection

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 9

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Energy spectrum Track separation

Direct detection – Energy spectrum

lR pair events per km2, per year, at the

detector. Curves that do not reach y

axis; from top to bottom: mq = 300,

600 and 900 GeV. Here,

mlR

= 150 GeV and mw = 250 GeV.

Also shown are the neutrino flux at

earth and the µ and the di-muon flux

through the detector (curves that reach

y axis; from top to bottom

respectively). In all cases we make use

of the WB limit for the neutrino flux.

Figure: I. F. M. Albuquerque, et al,

Physical Review D 75, 035006 (2007).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 9

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Energy spectrum Track separation

For track separations above 100 m there should not be any significant contribution from the di-muon background.

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600track separation (m)

dist

ribu

tion

stau (300)stau (600)stau (900)

0123456789

10

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200track separation (m)

dist

ribu

tion

µ+µ-

The relative normalization corresponds to the relative number of events for signal and background. Note thedifferent horizontal scales, as well as different binning between the two figures.

Figure: I. F. M. Albuquerque, et al, Physical Review D 75, 035006 (2007).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 10

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Indirect detection of NLSPs

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 11

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Indirect detection of NLSPs

Now: considering the τ decay

τ decay −→ τ + gravitino

τ regeneration:

τ decay −→ ντ + X

ντ Ncc−→ τ + X

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 11

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

τ survival probability (decay)

x (m)-610 -510 -410 -310 -210 -110 1 10 210 310 410 510 610

τ∼P

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

GeV 4 = 10F

GeV 5 = 10F

GeV 6 = 10F

GeV7 = 10F

GeV6 10× = 5 νE

Different√F (energy fixed).

x (m)1 10 210 310 410 510 610 710 810 910 1010

τ∼P

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

GeV 6 10×E = 5

GeV 8E = 10

GeV 9E = 10

GeV11E = 10

GeV6 10× = 1 F

Different energies (√F fixed).

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 12

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

IceCube

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 13

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

IceCube

τ energy at the detector and number of τ regenerations

Entries 141790Mean 4.756RMS 0.4387

(GeV))τν

Log10(E2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Eve

nts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Entries 141790Mean 4.756RMS 0.4387

GeV510× = 1F -- τ

= 300 GeVq~ at detector -- mτE

(GeV)νE610 710 810 910 1010 1110

Reg

ener

atio

ns

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

GeV510× = 1F

GeV610× = 1F

GeV610× = 5F

that reach the detectorτRegenerations --

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 13

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

τ ’s flux atIceCube

∼ 10−6

events

× km−2 ×year−1

(GeV)νE

610 710 810 910 1010 1110

)-1

.y-2

(km

νdN

/dE

νE

-1410

-1210

-1010

-810

-610

-410

-210

1

210

410

-- 29 710× = 5F : genτ∼

-- 6 710× = 5F : detτ∼

-610× -- 1510× = 1F : detτ

-710× -- 9610× = 1F : detτ

-710× -- 2610× = 5F : detτ

WB flux

= 300 GeVq~ -- mν E×Events

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 14

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Euso (∼ 2× 105 km2)

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 15

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Euso (∼ 2× 105 km2)

τ and τ at the atmosphere

(GeV)νE

610 710 810 910 1010 1110

)-1

.y-2

(km

νdN

/dE

νE

-610

-510

-410

-310

-210

-110

1

10

210

310

410

510

610 Gen = 29τ∼ TotalAtm = 6.1τ∼ NotDecay = 1.8τ∼ DecayAtm = 1.3τ∼

WB Fluxν

GeV610× = 5F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 15

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Euso (∼ 2× 105 km2)

τ and τ at the atmosphere

(GeV)νE

610 710 810 910 1010 1110

)-1

.y-2

(km

νdN

/dE

νE

-610

-510

-410

-310

-210

-110

1

10

210

310

410

510

610 Gen = 29τ∼ TotalAtm = 6.1τ∼ NotDecay = 1.8τ∼ DecayAtm = 1.3τ∼

WB Fluxν

GeV610× = 5FProblem: air fluorescence

is related to the number

of charged particles (Ne):

dNdx

= NfNe ,

Nf ∼ 4.8 photons × m−1

× (charged particle)−1

Ne = 1, 2 (τ case)

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 15

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Checking the τ

produced at theatmosphere:

(GeV)νE

610 710 810 910 1010 1110

)-1

.y-2

(km

νdN

/dE

νE

-610

-510

-410

-310

-210

-110

1

10

210

310

410

510

610 Gen = 29τ∼

BothDecayAtm = 0.15τ∼

TotalDecayAtm = 1.3τ∼

WB Fluxν

GeV610× = 5F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 16

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

Checking the τ

produced at theatmosphere:

Flux with a goodnumber of detectableshowers:

∼ 3 × 104

events × year−1

for the coincidence

case.

(GeV)νE

610 710 810 910 1010 1110

)-1

.y-2

(km

νdN

/dE

νE

-610

-510

-410

-310

-210

-110

1

10

210

310

410

510

610 Gen = 29τ∼

BothDecayAtm = 0.15τ∼

TotalDecayAtm = 1.3τ∼

WB Fluxν

GeV610× = 5F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 16

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

τ pair decaying coincidently at the atmosphere

Distance between showers ⇒ distinguishable signal with acceptable timming.

Entries 48540

Mean 191.6

RMS 108.2

Distance between staus (km)0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Eve

nts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Entries 48540

Mean 191.6

RMS 108.2

GeV 610× = 5F Entries 48540

Mean -6.363

RMS 0.2658

log10(time(s))-8 -7.5 -7 -6.5 -6 -5.5 -5

Eve

nts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Entries 48540

Mean -6.363

RMS 0.2658

GeV 610× = 5F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 17

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

But, there is still aproblem:

Entries 2577530

Mean 4.91

RMS 0.5064

log10(E(GeV))1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Eve

nts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Entries 2577530

Mean 4.91

RMS 0.5064

Atmτ∼ GeV6 10× = 5 F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 18

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions Interactions τ at IceCube (s)tau at Euso

But, there is still aproblem:

The (s)tau energyat the atmosphereis too low whencompared with thedetector threshold.

Entries 2577530

Mean 4.91

RMS 0.5064

log10(E(GeV))1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Eve

nts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Entries 2577530

Mean 4.91

RMS 0.5064

Atmτ∼ GeV6 10× = 5 F

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 18

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions

Conclusions

The flux of τ (from τ) at IceCube is too low. So, if the√F is

lower than ∼ 107 GeV, the NLSP detection with this detectorit is not possible;

The number of showers produced at the atmosphere is enoughfor a detector with an area like the Euso’s. The limitation isthe energy threshold. Maybe a different experiment?

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 19

Introduction Iteractions Direct Indirect Conclusions

Thanks!

Jairo C. de Souza Indirect detection of supersymmetric particles Slide: 20