Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit

Post on 22-Feb-2016

47 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit. Lee Tomlinson The University of Manchester IOP Liverpool 8 – 10 April 2013. The van der Meer method. Proportional to luminosity, R ( h ). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit

Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS

luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit

Lee TomlinsonThe University of Manchester

IOP Liverpool8 – 10 April 2013

Lee Tomlinson 2

The van der Meer method

8 - 10 April 2013

Beam separation, h

Prop

ortio

nal t

o lu

min

osity

, R(h

)

The vdM method allows one to calibrate the absolute

luminosity scale by scanning the beams past one another.

S. van der Meer, Calibration of the effective beam height

in the ISR. oai:cds.cern.ch:296752, Tech.

Rep. CERN-ISR-PO-68-31, CERN, Geneva, 1968.Implicitly assumes factorisation of x and y components! How does

(linear) x-y correlation in the beam affect this method?

Lee Tomlinson 3

The single-Gaussian model

8 - 10 April 2013

where and

The luminosity in this model is proportional to

This is the single-Gaussian bunch parameterisation

In the absence of explicit beam crossing angle

Lee Tomlinson 4

Two illuminating examples

8 - 10 April 2013

Different beam sizes

x-y correlation

Beam 1 Beam 1

Beam 2Beam 2

Lee Tomlinson 5

Scanning beams of different size

8 - 10 April 2013

Luminous region follows the bulk of the narrow beam as it scans the wider beam

Scan in horizonta

l direction

Beam 1 Beam 2

Lee Tomlinson 68 - 10 April 2013

Movements of luminous region is transverse to scan direction

Scanning x-y correlated beams

Beam 1 Beam 2

Scan in horizonta

l direction

Lee Tomlinson 7

Movements of the luminous centroid

8 - 10 April 2013

Lee Tomlinson 8

July 2012 scan (6) data

8 - 10 April 2013

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

Lee Tomlinson 9

July 2012 scan (6) data

8 - 10 April 2013

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

Lee Tomlinson 10

Constraints(July 2012 scan 6)

8 - 10 April 2013

1ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progressATLAS work in progress

Lee Tomlinson 11

Constraints(July 2012 scan 6)

8 - 10 April 2013

1

1

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progressSimilarly for the y-width constraints

Widths are uncertainties on measured Σ values

Lee Tomlinson 12

Constraints(July 2012 scan 6)

8 - 10 April 2013

1

1

2ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

Similarly for the y position during x scan From direct measurement of luminous region

correlation

ATLAS work in progress

κ is correlation coefficient

Lee Tomlinson 13

Constraints(July 2012 scan 6)

8 - 10 April 2013

1

1

2

Uncertainties from constraints in (1) are propagated to band

widths in (2)

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

ATLAS work in progress

Small allowed

region in correlation space,

consistent with zero

κ is correlation coefficient

Lee Tomlinson 14

Explicit beam crossing angle

8 - 10 April 2013

“Significant” crossing angle

…vdM scan III (3) in April 2012

ATLAS work in progress

…has been included in the model, essentially functioning as an x-z and a y-z correlation.

Lee Tomlinson 15

Conclusions• Permits a fully-analytic approach. Soluble with series solution about

small correlation.

• Systematic method for constraining all beam parameters without boot-strapping, iterating, etc.

• Arbitrary crossing-angle easily incorporated, retaining analyticity.

• Applied to vdM scans in Oct ’10, Mar ’11, May ’11, Apr ’12 and Jul ’12.

• Consistently suggests impact of (linear) transverse coupling on luminosity calibration is negligible.

• One of the systematic contributions that enters an unprecedented 1.8% luminosity error at ATLAS.

• On-going work: Further models have been explored in detail, which successfully account for many of the non-linear features observed in the data.

8 - 10 April 2013

Lee Tomlinson 16

BACKUP SLIDES

8 - 10 April 2013

Lee Tomlinson 17

Successes and limitations

8 - 10 April 2013

ATLAS work in progress

Non-linear tails cannot be described using single-

Gaussian model

ATLAS work in progress

Crossing angles are

easily implemented

in single-Gaussian

model

Lee Tomlinson 18

Further models and work in progress

8 - 10 April 2013

Further models have been explored in detail, which successfully

account for many of the non-linear features observed in the data.

An analytical approach is not always possible, as with the single-Gaussian model. Work is based on

solving these as far as possible.

Double Gaussian Super Gaussian

Lee Tomlinson 19

Scanning beams of different size

8 - 10 April 2013

Higher negative separation

Higher positive separation

Centred

Beam 1 Beam 2

Luminous region follows the bulk of the narrow beam as it scans the wider beam

Lee Tomlinson 208 - 10 April 2013

Movements of luminous region is transverse to scan direction

Higher negative separation

Higher positive separation

Centred

Scanning x-y correlated beams

Beam 1 Beam 2