IG Geophysics

Post on 11-Dec-2015

249 views 4 download

Tags:

description

geophysical exploration

Transcript of IG Geophysics

Chapter 5

GEOPHYSICS

Mechanical Wave

Measurements

Electromagnetic Wave

Techniques

Geophysical Methods

Mechanical Wave Measurements• Crosshole Tests (CHT)• Downhole Tests (DHT)• Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves• Seismic Refraction• Suspension Logging

Electromagnetic Wave Techniques• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)• Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)• Surface Resistivity (SR)• Magnetometer Surveys (MT)

Mechanical Wave Geophysics

Nondestructive measurements (s < 10-4%)

Both borehole geophysics and non-

invasive types (conducted across surface).

Measurements of wave dispersion:

velocity, frequency, amplitude,

attenuation.

Determine layering, elastic properties,

stiffness, damping, and inclusions

Four basic wave types: Compression (P),

Shear (S), Rayleigh (R), and Love (L).

Mechanical Wave Geophysics

Compression (P-) wave is fastest wave;

easy to generate.

Shear (S-) wave is second fastest wave. Is

directional and polarized. Most

fundamental wave to geotechnique.

Rayleigh (R-) or surface wave is very close

to S-wave velocity (90 to 94%). Hybrid P-S

wave at ground surface boundary.

Love (L-) wave: interface boundary effect

Mechanical Body Waves

Initial

P-wave

S-wave

Mechanical Body Waves

SourceReceiver (Geophone)

Oscilloscope

P

S RTime

Amplitude

R S P

Mechanical Waves (Compression)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Compression Wave Velocity, Vp (m/s)

Fresh Water

Sea Water

Clay

Sand

Till

I ce

Weathered Rocks

Intact Rocks

Steel

P - Wave Velocities

Mechanical Waves (Shear)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Shear Wave Velocity, VS (m/s)

Fresh Water

Sea Water

Clay

Sand

Till

I ce

Weathered Rocks

Intact Rocks

Steel

S - Wave Velocities

Resistivity, (ohm- meters)

Resistivity Values ( ICE, London, 1976)

} V s = 0

Geophysical Equipment

Seismograph Spectrum Analyzer

Portable Analyzer Velocity Recorder

Seismic Refraction

Vertical GeophonesSource(Plate)

Rock: Vp2

ASTM D 5777

Soil: Vp1

oscilloscope

x1x2x3x4

t1 t2 t3 t4

Note: Vp1 < Vp2

zR

Determine depthto rock layer, zR

Seismic Refraction

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020 T

rav

el

Tim

e (

se

co

nd

s)

0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance From Source (meters)

Horizontal Soil Layer over Rock

Vp1 = 1350 m/s

1

Vp2 = 4880 m/s

1z

x2

V VV V

cc p2 p1

p2 p1

Depth to Rock: zc = 5.65 m

xc = 15.0 m

x values

t valu

es

Shear Wave Velocity, Vs

Fundamental measurement in all solids

(steel, concrete, wood, soils, rocks)

Initial small-strain stiffness represented

by shear modulus: G0 = Vs2

(alias Gdyn = Gmax = G0)

Applies to all static & dynamic problems

at small strains (s < 10-6)

Applicable to both undrained & drained

loading cases in geotechnical

engineering.

CrossholeSeismic Testing

Equipment

Crosshole TestingOscilloscope

PVC-cased

Borehole

PVC-cased

Borehole

DownholeHammer (Source) Velocity

Transducer (GeophoneReceiver)

t

x

Shear Wave Velocity:Vs = x/t

TestDepth

ASTM D 4428

Pump

packer

Note: Verticality of casingmust be established by

slope inclinometers to correctdistances x with depth.

SlopeInclinometer

SlopeInclinometer

© Paul Mayne/GTx = fctn(z)

from inclinometers

Downhole SeismicTesting Equipment

Downhole TestingOscilloscope

Cased Borehole

TestDepth

Interval

HorizontalVelocity

Transducers (GeophoneReceivers)

packer

PumpHorizontal Plank

with normal load

Shear Wave Velocity:Vs = R/t

z1z2

t

R12 = z1

2 + x2

R22 = z2

2 + x2

x

Hammer

© Paul Mayne/GT

SensorsSource

SignalAnalyzer

Accelerometer

RayleighSurfaceWaves

In-Situ Surface Wave Testing

Layer 1

Layer 2

Layer 3

Layer 4

Shear Wave Measurements

Seismic Piezocone Test (SCPTu)

60o

fs

qc

Vs

u1

u2

Cone Tip Stress, qt

Penetration Porewater Pressure,u Sleeve Friction, fs

Arrival Time of Downhole Shear Wave, ts

Cone Tip Stress, qt

Penetration Porewater Pressure,u Sleeve Friction, fs

Arrival Time of Downhole Shear Wave, ts

Obtains Four Independent Measurements with Depth:Hybrid of Penetrometerwith Downhole Geophysics

Seismic Piezocone Test

• Electronically-actuated

• Self-contained

• Left and right polarization

• Modified beam uses fin to enhance shear wave generation

• Successfully tested to depths of 20m

• Capable of being used with traditional impulse hammer

Automated Seismic Source

Downhole Shear Wave Velocity

Anchoring System Automated Source Polarized Wave Downhole Vs with excellent soil coupling.

Anchoring System Automated Source Polarized Wave Downhole Vs with excellent soil coupling.

Complete Set of Shear Wave TrainsMud Island Site A, Memphis TN

Sounding – Memphis, Shelby County, TN

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 10 20 30 40

qt (MPa)

Dep

th (

m)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 100 200 300

fs (kPa)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 1000 2000 3000u2 (kPa)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 100 200 300 400

Vs (m/sec)

Seismic Flat Dilatometer (SDMT)

Seismic DMTs at UMASS, Amherst

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8

Lift-off Pressure po (bars)

Dep

th (

m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 20 40 60 80

Travel Time of Shear Wave (ms)

SDMT1

SDMT4

SDMT5

6

8

10

12

DMT 2

DMT 3

SDT 4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 5 10 15

Expansion Pressure p1 (bars)

SDMT 1

DMT 2

DMT 3

SDMT 4

SDMT 5

More Better

More Measurements is

Geophysical Methods

Electromagnetic Wave

Techniques

Electromagnetic Wave Geophysics

Nondestructive methods

Non-invasive; conducted across

surface.

Measurements of electrical & magnetic

properties of the ground: resistivity

(conductivity), permittivity, dielectric,

and magnetic fields.

Cover wide spectrum in frequencies

(10 Hz < f < 1022 Hz).

Electromagnetic Wave Geophysics

Surface Mapping Techniques:

• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

• Electrical Resistivity (ER) Surveys

• Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)

• Magnetometer Surveys (MS)

Downhole Techniques

• Resistivity probes, MIPs, RCPTu

• 2-d and 3-d Tomography

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

GPR surveys conducted on gridded areas

Pair of transmitting and receiver antennae

Short impulses of high-freq EM wave

Relative changes in dielectric properties

reflect differences in subsurface.

Depth of exploration is soil dependent (up

to 30 m in dry sands; only 3 m in wet

saturated clay)

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Xadar Sensors & Software GeoRadar

Illustrative Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Crossing an underground utility corridor

Illustrative Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Illustrative Results of Ground

Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Geostratigraphy

Examples of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Useful in Locating Underground Utilities

Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Results from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

Electrical Resistivity (ER) Surveys

Resisitivity R (ohm-m) is an electrical

property. It is the reciprocal of

conductivity

Arrays of electrodes used to measure

changes in potential.

Evaluate changes in soil types and

variations in pore fluids

Used to map faults, karst features (caves,

sinkholes), stratigraphy, contaminant

plumes.

Electrical

Resisitivity

Measurements

What will be gained by changing electrodespacing?

Depth of ER survey:i.e., greater spacing influences deeper

Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

Electrical Resisitivity Measurements

1 10 100 1000 10000

Bulk Resistivity, (ohm- meters)

Clay

Loam

Loose Sands

Sands & Gravels

Glacial Till

Weathered Rocks

Resistivity Values (ConeTec & GeoProbe, 1997)

Electrical Resistivity

Electromagnetic Conductivity (EM)

Magnetometer Surveys (MS)

Measure relative changesin the earths' magneticfield across a site.

Applicability of In-Situ Tests

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Grain Size (mm)

In-S

itu

Test

Meth

od

SPT

CPT

DMT

PMT

VST

Geophysics

CLAYS SILTS SANDS GRAVELS Cobbles/ Boulders

In-Situ Testing - Objectives

Select in-situ tests for augmenting, supplementing, and even replacing borings.

Realize the applicability of various in-situ methods to different soil conditions.

Recognize the complementary nature of in-situ direct push methods with conventional rotary drilling & sampling methods.

Recognize values for utilizing these methods and quality implications for their underuse.

A.P. Van den Berg Track Truck