I live here. Address: Planet Earth.

28th Annual SALIS ConferenceNewton Sheraton HotelBoston, Massachusetts

Barbara Seitz de Martinez, PhD, MLS, CPPSeptember 27, 2006

Indiana Prevention Resource CenterPREV-STAT Service

The IPRC is funded in part by a contract w/ the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Mental Health and Addiction.

©Copyright 2006 – The Trustees of Indiana University

I live here.Address: Planet Earth

Using GIS to Redefine Space and Timein Substance Abuse Information Science

GIS in Prevention combines Geographic Locators and Demographic and other Data and Statistics

Environment GeographyThe People

Characteristics

Needs

Values

Norms

+

Their Interactions with

Their Environment

Institutions

Organizations

Forest Manor / Martindale-Brightwood Neighborhoods

The Place: Neighborhood

46218

AG

S Indiana C

ore D

emographics

The Place: Government Boundaries

AG

S Indiana C

ore D

emographics

Study a Place

Logic Model for Substance Abuse Prevention

Substance-RelatedConsequences

and Use

Intervening Factors

Community• Crime• Strain on Family

Services• Strain on Schools• Strain on Healthcare

Individual• Physical damage• Psychological damage• Harm loved ones• Family disintegration

Community• Availability

– Price– Retail– Social

• Social Norms• Enforcement

Individual• Perceptions of risk• Perceptions of harm• Ability to act independently

Strategies

Select strategies –policies, programs, and practices – that address the Intervening Factors in order to change the problematic Substance Use and Substance-Related Consequences in your geographic area.

Adapted from CSAP, Strategic Prevention Framework, Indianapolis, Feb. 21, 2006

Society -- Social Values• Overachievement• Body Image -- Thinness ideal• Economic success as No 1

Priority

Mapping Drug-Related Data: Cocaine

Source: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/americas/colombia_coca_density_2002.gif

Coca/Cocaine Cultivation, Columbia

Hectars per square kilometer

from "The Drug Trade in Colombia: A Threat Assessment", U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, Intelligence Division, March 2002

Opium Poppy Cultivation, Columbia, SA

Hectars per square kilometer

from "The Drug Trade in Colombia: A Threat Assessment", U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, Intelligence Division, March 2002

Source:http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/americas/colombia_poppy_areas_2002.gif

Mapping Drug-Related Data -- Opium

+ Drug Tests: Any Illicit Drug

Any Illicit Drug

Source: http://www.ohsinc.com/positive_rates_drug_testing_drug_screening_MAPS.htm

from OHS Health and Safety: Positive Drug Tests, 2000, by 3-digit Zip CodeWorkplace Pre-Employment Drug Testing

+ Drug Tests: Amphetamines

Amphetamines

Source: http://www.ohsinc.com/positive_rates_drug_testing_drug_screening_MAPS.htm

from OHS Health and Safety: Positive Drug Tests, 2000, by 3 Digit Zip CodeWorkplace Pre-Employment Drug Testing

Flow of Drugs – Coca --Planning Tool

Source:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/drugs_uk/drugs_map/html/default.stm

BBC Source: UN Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drugs Report, 2005.

Flow of Drugs – Meth – Planning Tool

Source:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/drugs_uk/drugs_map/html/default.stm

BBC Source: UN Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drugs Report, 2005.

Drug Threat Survey – Planning Tool

Source: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/18862/appenda.htm

DEA: National Drug Threat Survey, 2005, of state and local agencies

Drug Threat Survey – Planning Tool

Source: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/18862/appenda.htm

DEA: National Drug Threat Survey, 2005, of state and local agencies

Drug Distribution Center

Source: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/18862/appenda.htm

DEA: National Drug Threat Survey, 2005, of state and local agencies

Drug Threat Survey – Planning Tool

Source: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/concern/18862/appenda.htm

DEA: National Drug Threat Survey, 2005, of state and local agencies

“Planet Earth”

www.rgo.ru

“Planet Earth”

www.rgo.ru

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

Geogracom does:

• Strategic planning • Provide information and maps to assist in

regional development• Feasibility studies• Transportation planning• Cost projections for development of road

networks• Problem solving related to “Quality of Life”

issues – impact analysis• Evaluation – system appraisal / project evaluation

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

They use a GIS and data

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

They use a GIS and data

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

Geography in Strategic Planning

http://www.geogracom.ru/portal_e.html

Obstacles to a Global Drug Information System

• Public Policy Differences• Funds – Budget Limitations• Access to High Speed Communication Systems• Goals and Priorities Differ• Definitions (e.g., legality, norms, risks)• Languages• Compatibility of Technologies

Ways GIS Can Help You with Prevention Planning

Obtain Demographic BackgroundProfile Readiness, Needs, and Resources

Locate Problem Area or Target AudienceEnhance Cultural Competency

Inform Decisions about Strategy SelectionObtain Funding

More Ways GIS Can Help You with Prevention Assessment and Evaluation

Importing Local Data

Geocoding

Percentages, Rates and Rankings

Analysis and Custom Mapping

Deaths from Influenza/Pneumonia

Top 10 Indiana Counties for Influenza/Pneumonia Deaths, 2004

240

200

160

120

80

40

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

www.drugs.indiana.edu

PREV-STAT

www.drugs.indiana.edu

Product/Tool: GIS in

Prevention, County Profile

Series, No. 3(2006)

GIS in Prevention, County Profile Fact Sheet

GIS in Prevention, County Profile Fact Sheet

IPRC PREV-STAT Service

www.drugs.indiana.edu

www.drugs.indiana.edu

GIS in Prevention, County Profile, Series 3

GIS in Prevention, County Profile, Series 3

42

THE INDIANA PREVENTION RESOURCE CENTER

GIS in Prevention County Profiles Series, No. 3

Lake County, Indiana

Barbara Seitz de Martinez, PhD, MLS, CPP

The Indiana Prevention Resource Center at Indiana University is funded, in part, by a contract with the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, financially supported through HHS/Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant. The IPRC is operated by the Department of Applied Health Science and The School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation.

GIS in Prevention County Profile Series, No. 3

Lake County, Indiana

Barbara Seitz de Martinez, PhD, MLS, CPP

Project Staff:

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Trustees of Indiana University or the Division of Mental Health and Addiction. Indiana University accepts full Responsibility for the content of this publication. ©2006 The Trustees of Indiana University. Permission is extended to reproduce this County Profile for non-profit educational purposes. All other rights reserved.

Kyoungsun Heo, MPARitika Bhawal, MPH, BSSolomon Briggs, B.A.

5.1 Population

Table 5.1b Population by Age Source: (AGS, 2004 est., 2005)

Table 5.1a: Totals: Population, Households, and Geographic Characteristics (AGS, 2004 est., 2005).

Total Population and Geographic Data, 2004 est.

  Warren Co. Indiana U.S.

Total Population 8,788 6,230,346 293,686,994

Persons per sq. mi. 24 174 83

Total Households 3,416 2,465,349 112,708,665

Land Area (sq. miles) 365 35,867 3,537,438

Water Area (sq. miles) 2 551 256,645

Population by Age 0-24 (as Percent of Total Population), 2004 est.

Year Dubois Co. Indiana U.S.

0-4 6.6 6.8 6.8

5-9 7.1 7 6.8

10-13 6.1 5.8 5.7

14-17 6 5.8 5.7

18-20 3.6 3.6 3.5

21-24 2.6 2.9 2.9

Map: Median Age of Population (equal count)

Equal Count

AGS, Core Demographics,2004 estimates (2005)

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Map: Median Age Current Yr. (contour map)

AGS, Core Demographics,2004 estimates (2005)

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

5.2 Race/Ethnicity

Table 5.2: Race/Ethnicity, 2004 estimates (AGS, 2004 est., 2005)

Race & Hispanic/Latino Origin, 2004 est., (AGS, 2005) (Percent):

Race/Ethnic Group Marion Indiana U.S.

White 70.1 87.5 75

Black 24.5 8.4 12.3

Asian 1.4 1 3.7

Two or More Races 1.6 1.2 2.4

Hispanic origin 5.1 4.1 14.3

Map: Race/Ethnicity, White

Map: Race/Ethnicity, Black

Map: Race/Ethnicity, Black (contour)

Map: Race/Ethnicity, Black (prism by county)

Map: Race/Ethnicity: Hispanic/Latino

(prism)

5.7 Educational Attainment

Table 5.7: Educational Attainment (AGS, 2004 est., 2005)

Educational Attainment, 2004 est. (AGS, 2005)

  Dubois Co. Indiana U.S.

Less than 9th grade 9.1 5.3 7.6

9th to 12th grade, no diploma 10.8 12.6 12

Total, Less Than 9th or Less Than HS Diploma 19.9 17.8 19.6

High school graduate 44.7 37.2 28.6

Some college, no degree 13.9 19.8 21.1

Associate degree 7.4 5.8 6.3

Bachelor's degree 9.2 12.2 15.6

Graduate or profession degree 4.9 7.2 8.9

Rank for % of Pop 25+ w/ less than HS diploma 39 26th of 51  

Rank for % of Pop 25+ w/ a college degree 22 43rd of 51  

Map: Education, Any College Degree

5.9 Families (by type)

Table 5.9a: Types of Households with Children (AGS, 2004 est., 2005); Median Family Income (AGS, 2004 est., 2005)

Types of Households w/ Children and Median Family Income, 2004 est. (AGS, 2005)

County Hamilton Co. Indiana U.S.

HHs w/ children (2004) 36,645 864,296 40,102,709Married Couple Family (Percent) 84.1 70 69Lone Parent Male (Percent) 3.9 6.9 6.8Lone Parent Female (Percent) 11.4 21.8 23.2Non-family Male Head (Percent) 0.5 1.1 0.8Non-family Female Head (Percent) 0.1 0.2 0.2Median Family Income 86,222 54,393 54,087Rank for Married Couple Family (% of HHs w/ children) 1 26th of 51  Rank for Median Family Income 1 21st of 51  

Map: Median Family Income

AGS, Core Demographics,2004 estimates (2005)

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

GIS in Prevention, County Profile, Series 3

6.0 – 6.5 Archival Risk Factors: Overview

Community Risk Factors: Availability of Drugs

• Alcohol Sales Outlets per Capita

• Tobacco Sales Outlets per Capita

• Tobacco Access to Minors – TRIP role

• Proximity to schools of retailers that have sold tobacco products to minors

• Methamphetamine Lab Seizures

Geocoding Failed TRIP Inspections

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Source: IN State Excise Police, TRIP

Source: GIS in Prevention, County Profiles, Series 3 (Indiana Prevention Resource Center, 2006)

Sold tobacco to a minor during a TRIP retail inspection

Schools in Proximity to Failed TRIP Inspections

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Source: IN State Excise Police, TRIP

Allen County

Source: GIS in Prevention, Allen County Profile, Series 3 (Indiana Prevention Resource Center, 2006)

Schools in Proximity to Failed Trip Inspections

Clark County Source: GIS in Prevention, Clark County Profile, Series 3 (Indiana Prevention Resource Center, 2006)

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Source: IN State Excise Police, TRIP

Schools in Proximity Close-up

Clark County -- Clarksville

Source: GIS in Prevention, Clark County Profile, Series 3 (Indiana Prevention Resource Center, 2006)

Middle School

Outlet SellingTo Minor

Map: Meth Busts, Jan. 1- Oct. 15, 2005 (prism)

Total lab busts to mid October, 846 Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Source: IN State Police, 2005

GIS in Prevention, County Profile, Series 3

6.6 - 6.15 Archival Risk Factors

Community Risk Factors: Laws & Norms

• HH Spending on Alcohol• HH Spending on Tobacco• Adult Tobacco Behavior• Tobacco Production • Intensity of Inspection (TRIP)• Gambling Locations• Adult Gambling Behaviors• Hoosier Lottery Statistics

Community Risk Factors: Transitions & Mobility

• Crime Indices: Main Categories

• Crime Indices: Specific Crimes

• FBI UCR – All Arrests

• FBI UCR – Juvenile Arrests

• Alcohol Related Crashes

• More Alcohol Related Crashes

• Net Migration (Domestic and International)

6.6 Household Spending on Alcohol

Table 6.6: Per Household Spending on Alcohol (AGS, Consumer Spending, 2003, 2004)

Per Household Spending on Alcohol, 2004 est. (AGS, 2005)

  Hamilton Indiana U.S.

Consumer spending on alcoholic beverages 646 439 460

Spending on Alcohol for Consumption outside the Home 279 188 197

Beer and ale away from home 92 62 65

Wine away from home 43 29 30

Whiskey away from home 72 48 50

Alcohol On Out-Of-Town Trips 72 49 52

Spending on Alcohol for Consumption in the Home 366 250 261

Beer and ale at home 211 145 152

Wine at home 89 60 63

Whiskey and other liquor at home 66 45 46

Map: Spending on Beer/Ale for Home

AGS, Consumer Spending,2004 est., 2005

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

6.7 Household Spending on Tobacco

Table 6.7: Per Household Spending on Tobacco Products, Miscellaneous Reading and Personal Insurance (AGS, Consumer Spending, 2004, 2005)

Per Household Spending on Tobacco, 2004, est. (AGS, 2005)

Morgan Indiana U.S.

Per Household Spending on Tobacco Products 448 428 443

Cigarettes 405 388 400

Other Tobacco Products 43 41 44

Per Household Spending on Misc. Reading 254 245 257

Newspapers 113 109 114

Magazines 54 52 54

Books 87 84 88

Personal insurance 547 523 552

6.12a Crime Indices

Table 6.12b: Specific Crimes, Indices (AGS Crime Risk 2003, 2004)

Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR)

County DeKalb Indiana U.S. IN Rank in US

Total Crime Index 17 93 101 30th of 51

Personal Crime Index

14 74 101 26th of 51

Property Crimes 17 110 102 27th of 51

Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR) -- Rankings

  DeKalb IN Rank in US

Rank Total Crime Index 75 30th of 51

Rank Personal Crime 75 26th of 51

Rank Property Crimes 71 27th of 51

Map: Property Crime IndicesBottom Quarter, Mid Range, Top Quarter (includes over IN & over US)

Above US (9), 101.55-194

Above IN (12), 95.55-194

Top Quarter (23), 64-194

Mid Range (46), 19-64

Lowest Quarter (23), 4-19

AGS, Crime Indices2004 (2005)Indiana Prevention Resource Center

GIS in Prevention, County Profile, Series 3

6.16 - 6.14 Archival Risk Factors

Community Risk Factors: Extreme Economic & Social Deprivation

6.16 Unemployment6.17 Free Lunch/Textbooks6.18 Food Stamp Recipients6.19 TANF6.20 Adults w/o HS Diploma 6.21 Single Parent Family Households

Poverty: Introduction6.22 Total Poverty and by Age6.23 Families with Own Children in Poverty6.24 Poverty by Race6.25 Single Parent Families in Poverty6.26 Lack of Health Insurance

Map: Education, Less Than HS Diploma

AGS, Core Demographics,2004 est., 2005Indiana Prevention Resource Center

6.18 Food Stamp Recipients

Table 6.18: Food Stamp Recipients per Month in 2004 (FSSA, Division of Family and Children, 2005) and Rate per 1,000 Total Population for 2004 and 2005 and Change in Rate (calculations from the IPRC based on data from FSSA, Division of Family and Children, 2004 and 2005).

CSAP calculates this as the average number of persons who receive food stamps each month, stated as the rate per 1,000 persons in the total population. This statistic for Indiana comes from Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Family Resources Bureau as reported in the Indiana Youth Institute Kids Count in Indiana 2005. The rate calculation comes from the Indiana Prevention Resource Center. The following table shows the rate for 2004 for this county with comparisons for the state and nation.

Food Stamps, 2004 (FSSA, Family Resources Bureau, 2006)

  Marion Indiana

Population, 2004 864,200

6,230,346

Food Stamp Recipients per mo., 2004 104,832

516,360

Rate per 1000 persons, 2004 121.3 82.9

Rate per 1000 persons, 2003 105.1 73.1

Change in Rate per 1,000 from 2003 to 2004 16.2 9.8

Rank for 2004 Rate per 1,000 Persons 3  

Map: Single Moms (prism)

AGS, Core Demographics,2004 est., 2005Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Map: No Health Insurance

Equal

AGS, Consumer Behavior, Insurance2004 est., 2005

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

6.26 Lack of Health Insurance

Table 6.26: Insurance Coverage, 2004 (MRI, Consumer Behavior Insurance 2004, 2005)

Percent of Persons 18 and over with No Health Insurance, 2004, est. (AGS, 2005)

  Hamilton Indiana U.S.

Current Year Population 18 years and over 161,581 4,649,101 220,577,940

Have no medical insurance 58.2 59.7 61.5

Rank for No Health Insurance 80 31 of 51  

Map: Health Insurance from Union or Work

AGS, Consumer Behavior, Insurance2004 est., 2005

Indiana Prevention Resource Center

6.26 Lack of Health Insurance

Table 6.26: Insurance Coverage, 2004 (MRI, Consumer Behavior Insurance 2004, 2005)

Health Insurance Source, 2004 est. (AGS, 2005)  Marion Indiana U.S.

From a union 2.3 2 1.8

From a place of work 29 27.1 25.7

From fraternal member group 0.6 0.6 0.6

From a union or place of work 31.3 29 27.6

Medicaid 2.4 1.9 1.8

Medicare 6.1 5.9 5.7

Rank for Ins from Union or Place of Work 4 16 of 51  

Rank for Insurance from Medicaid 3 17 of 51  

Rank for Medicare 52 22 of 51  

Translation Tool – Babel Fish

http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr

Translation Tool – Free Dictionary

http://www.freedict.com/onldict/fre.html

Indiana Prevention Resource Center2735 East 10th Street, CA110

Bloomington, IN 47408Phone: (800) 346-3077Fax: (812) 855-4940

E-mail: drugprc@indiana.eduWWW: http://www.drugs.indiana.edu

The Indiana Prevention Resource Center is funded, in part, by a contract with the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, financially supported through HHS/Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant.  The IPRC is operated by the Indiana University Department of Applied Health Science and School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation.  It is affiliated with the Department's Institute of Drug Abuse Prevention. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Trustees of Indiana University or the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration. Indiana University accepts full responsibility for the content of this publication. © Copyright, 2005 by the Trustees of Indiana University.

Thank you so much!

Drug Information

Systems: Principles,

Structures and Indicators

http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2002_01_01_1_ru.pdf

http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2002_01_01_1_ru.pdf

Drugs and Crime

The world report on drugs 2000 tackles the "psychology of despair" which had seized a whole generation and makes the point that the drug problem is neither irremediable nor irreversible. It notes, however, that threats remain and that it is thus necessary to show vigilance and to redouble efforts: the abuse of drugs continues to harm the lives of too many people, in particular young people . . . criminal organizations benefit from such a state of affairs, more so in the developed countries than in the developing countries. According to estimates of the UNO, approximately 180 million people in the world (that is to say 4.2 % of people over 15 years of age) consumed drugs at the end of the 1990s, in particular cannabis (144 million), stimulants -- amphetamine (29 million), cocaine (14 million) and opiates (13,5 million, including 9 million heroin addicts). (1) the drug problem has even larger repercussions, which are associated at the same time with the spread of infectious diseases, money laundering, corruption and the financing of rebel or terrorist groups. However, the world report on drugs also shows that certain elements encourage optimism. The most significant progress relates to two drugs (cocaine and heroin), which pose the most problems on a world scale in terms of demand for treatment services, cases of hospitalization and overdose, death, violence and the implication of organized crime groups.

http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2002_01_01_1_ru.pdf

World Report on Drugs – Facts and Projections

http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2003_01_01_1_fr.pdf

Use of GIS to Analyze Illegal Drug Activity in Australia

http://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2003_01_01_1_fr.pdf

Use of GIS to Analyze Illegal Drug Activity in Australia

French OFDT Annual Report on Drugs and Drug Addiction

http://www.ofdt.fr/BDD/publications/docs/igrxmcm4.pdf

• Epidemiological Facts• Demand Reduction• Political and Legislative

Developments• Current Trends

http://www.ofdt.fr/BDD/publications/docs/igrxmcm4.pdf p. 3

French OFDT Annual Report on Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2005Surveillance System of the most commonly consumed drugs – regional atlas

– trends – demand – cannibis and cocaine Problems – lack of funds, electronic tools

European Drug Information Systems/Organizations/Agencies

• TOXIBASE• SINTES• CIRDD – drugs/dep• EWS – Early Warn Sys• RPIB• CSST - treatment• RECAP• SIMCCA - cannabis

• CCAA – alcool/alcohol• DGS – Ministry of Health• DHOS• *CAARUD – harm reduc• ASUD – self-help• l’ARF• MDM• AIDES

European Drug Information Systems/Organizations/Agencies

• Groupe Pompidou• MedSPAD• REITOX• France – Pays Bas• France – Pologne/Poland• OFDT-Venezuela• TAIEX – France-Chypre/Cyprus• OEDT – Europe – Drugs• EMCDDA – European Monitoring Center