Post on 24-Jan-2021
G E O S C I E N C E A U S T R A L I A
Hydrocarbon Generation and Expulsion from Early Cretaceous Source Rocks in the Browse Basin, North West Shelf, Australia: a Small Angle Neutron Scattering and Pyrolysis StudyAnalysis and report by
Andrzej P. Radlinski, Dianne S. Edwards, Alan L. Hinde, Rachel Davenport and John M. Kennard
Record
2007/04
S P A T I A L I N F O R M A T I O N F O R T H E N A T I O N
GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA
Hydrocarbon Generation and Expulsion from Early Cretaceous Source Rocks in the Browse Basin,
North West Shelf, Australia: a Small Angle Neutron Scattering and Pyrolysis Study
Analysis and report by
Andrzej P. Radlinski, Dianne S. Edwards, Alan L. Hinde, Rachel Davenport and John M. Kennard 2003 Rachel Davenport and John M. Kennard 2003 Rachel Davenport and John M. Kennard
Petroleum Promotion and Specialist Studies Research Group, Marine and Petroleum Division
Geoscience Australia,PO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601.
Ph. 61 6 249 9111 Fax. 61 6 249 9980
Geoscience Australia Record No 2007/04
ISBN 9781921236273
3 February 2006
ii
iii
Summary
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS), Rock-Eval pyrolysis and total organic carbon (TOC) analyses were carried out on 165 organic-rich Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous sedimentary rock samples from nine wells in the Browse Basin (Adele-1, Argus-1, Brecknock South-1, Brewster-1A, Carbine-1, Crux-1, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1). Cutting samples and some sidewall cores have been used. Out of the total 165 samples, 47 samples (22 for Brewster-1A and 25 for Dinichthys-1) were also analysed using the Ultra-small Angle Neutron Scattering (USANS) technique. The focus of the study was to identify potential Lower Cretaceous source rocks and the depth at which the onset of hydrocarbon generation occurred in each well, and to determine the onset of hydrocarbon expulsion in the wells for which USANS data were available.
This Record contains a complete description of geochemical and SANS methods and data acquired in 2003 and later selectively used to produce an APPEA publication (Radlinski et al. 2004). This is the first time that such a study has combined the approaches offered by the two disciplines.
The neutron scattering and geochemical techniques provide complementary information about petroleum source rocks. Together, the TOC content and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data evaluate source richness, source quality, kerogen type and thermal maturity, whereas SANS/USANS detect the presence of generated bitumen in pores and are pore-size specific. As the pore-size range in mudstones extends from about 0.001 µm to about 40 µm, the presence of bitumen in the small pores (up to 0.1 µm) detected by SANS indicates the onset of hydrocarbon generation, whereas the presence of bitumen in the largest pores detected by USANS (about 10 µm) indicates a significant saturation and the onset of hydrocarbon expulsion.
Brewster-1A and Carbine-1 were drilled with water-based muds which had no detrimental effects on the Rock-Eval pyrolysis and TOC data. Adele-1, Argus-1, Brecknock South-1, Crux-1 and Dinichthys-1 have been drilled using water-based muds containing 'glycol' additives. The shallow sections of the Titanichthys-1 and Gorgonichthys-1 wells were drilled with water-based muds containing glycol additives, and the deeper sections were drilled using synthetic-based muds (SBMs). To determine the hydrocarbon potential of these contaminated samples, extraction procedures with organic solvents were devised, and on analysis, these procedures were observed to have variable success in removing the organic contaminants. The solvent extraction process removes the naturally occurring free hydrocarbons, as well as the organic contaminants, from the whole rock, resulting in the absence of, or a reduction in, the Rock-Eval pyrolysis S1 peak depending on the rigorousness of the extraction process. Other pyrolysis parameters are also affected if contamination remains; namely S2 values increase and Tmax values decrease. The affected S1 and S2 peaks also result in erratic potential yields (S1+S2), an apparent increase in Hydrogen Index (HI = S2*100/TOC), and a decrease in, or null value for, the Production Index (PI = S1/S1+S2). In contrast to the pyrolysis data, the SANS/USANS data obtained on the untreated whole-rock samples do not appear to be influenced by the type of drilling mud used.
iv
The Lower Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation contains some source rocks with the potential to generate and expel liquid hydrocarbons, with the present day values of the hydrogen index, reduced from the original values by the maturity and mineral matrix effects, in the range 150-264mg/gTOC. The formation is also sufficiently thermally mature for hydrocarbon generation to occur. SANS/USANS data for Dinichthys-1 show the presence of generated bitumen in pores of all sizes near the base of the formation, but not within the underlying 57 m thick mudstone of the Upper Vulcan Formation juxtaposed between the Echuca Shoals Formation and the Berriasian ‘Brewster’ Sandstone, which is an important reservoir rock within the Upper Vulcan Formation. It appears that the top mudstone of the Upper Vulcan Formation acts as a barrier for hydrocarbon migration from the Echuca Shoals Formation towards the Berriasian ‘Brewster’ Sandstone, and, therefore, hydrocarbons generated in the Echuca Shoals Formation have not been expelled into the Berriasian Sandstone reservoir. This is consistent with previous findings based on oil-source correlation that the Upper Vulcan reservoirs have not been charged from Early Cretaceous source rocks. In Brewster-1A there is SANS/USANS evidence of pore-size-specific oil-to-gas cracking within the Echuca Shoals Formation. SANS evidence for bitumen generation in small pores of the Echuca Shoals Formation has also been found in Adele-1, Crux-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. There is no conclusive SANS evidence for bitumen generation in small pores of Argus-1 (overmature organic matter in this deep well), Brecknock South-1 (potential generation signature possibly overprinted by variable source rock lithology) and Carbine-1 (possible generation signature overprinted by strong sediment compaction in this shallow well).
The Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation has similar source potential to the underlying Echuca Shoals Formation, but slightly lower organic carbon content and lower thermal maturity. For Brewster-1A and Dinichthys-1, SANS/USANS indicate the presence of bitumen in small pores but not in the largest pores, which indicates that the volume of generated hydrocarbons was insufficient to saturate the pore space and create an effective source charge. There is also SANS evidence of the presence of bitumen in the small pores of this formation in Adele-1, Crux-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1.
In summary, the Rock-Eval pyrolysis and TOC data imply the existence of a potential source rock in the Lower Cretaceous sediments of the Browse Basin, whereas the SANS/USANS data indicate significant generation but little or no expulsion. This source limitation may explain poor exploration success for liquid hydrocarbons in the area. SANS/USANS data preclude the possibility of an oil charge to the Berriasian ‘Brewster’ Sandstone from the Echuca Shoals Formation, although some gas charge in Brewster-1A well is possible.
v
Contents
Summary ..................................................................................................................... iii
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................1
2. Analytical Procedures .............................................................................................3
2.1 Samples ..........................................................................................................3
2.2 Analytical Techniques ....................................................................................52.2.1 Small Angle Neutron Scattering and Ultra-small Angle Neutron
Scattering ..............................................................................................52.2.2 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis .............................................................................5
2.3 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Size Fraction Experiments ...........................................5
2.4 Washing Method Experiments .......................................................................62.4.1 Pyrograms of Water-based Drilling Mud Samples ...............................62.4.2 Pyrograms of Glycol Contaminated Samples ......................................72.4.3 Pyrograms of SBM Contaminated Samples .......................................10
3 Results ...................................................................................................................13
TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis ..............................................................................13
SANS and USANS Analysis .................................................................................14
3.1 Brewster-1A .................................................................................................153.1.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............153.1.2 Source Richness .................................................................................163.1.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ......................................173.1.4 Analysis of SANS and USANS data .................................................18
3.2 Carbine-1 .....................................................................................................333.2.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............333.2.2 Source Richness .................................................................................333.2.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ......................................333.2.4 Analysis of SANS data .......................................................................37
3.3 Adele-1 ........................................................................................................443.3.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............443.3.2 Laboratory Comparisons ....................................................................473.3.3 Source Richness .................................................................................473.3.4 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ......................................473.3.5 Analysis of SANS data .......................................................................49
3.4 Argus-1 ........................................................................................................603.4.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............603.4.2 Maturity ..............................................................................................61
vi
3.4.3 Analysis of SANS data .......................................................................63
3.5 Brecknock South-1 ......................................................................................723.5.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............723.5.2 Source Richness .................................................................................733.5.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ......................................753.5.4 Analysis of SANS data .......................................................................76
3.6 Crux-1 ..........................................................................................................843.6.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ..............843.6.2 Source Richness .................................................................................853.6.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ......................................883.6.4 Analysis of SANS data .......................................................................88
3.7 Dinichthys-1 ..............................................................................................1023.7.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ............1023.7.2 Source Richness ...............................................................................1033.7.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ....................................1033.7.4 Analysis of SANS and USANS data ...............................................105
3.8 Gorgonichthys-1 ........................................................................................1183.8.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ............1183.8.2 Source Richness ...............................................................................1193.8.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ....................................1193.8.4 Analysis of SANS data .....................................................................121
3.9 Titanichthys-1 ............................................................................................1313.9.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons ............1313.9.2 Source Richness ...............................................................................1333.9.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity ....................................1343.9.4 Analysis of SANS data .....................................................................135
4 Discussion: Well Comparisons ............................................................................145
4.1 Pyrolysis results: Adele-1 compared to Brewster-1A ...............................145
4.2 Pyrolysis results: new Ichthys Field wells compared to Brewster-1A .......145
4.3 SANS results: new Ichthys Field wells compared to Brewster-1A ...........148
4.4 SANS Results: Adele-1 and Crux-1 compared to Brewster-1A ................152
4.5 Source Rock Summary ..............................................................................154
5 Conclusions .........................................................................................................157
6 Recommendations and Further Work ..................................................................159
7 References ...........................................................................................................161
Well Completion Reports ....................................................................................162
vii
APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................163
Appendix 1: List of Wells, Samples and Depository Sequences ..............................165
Appendix 2:Analytical Procedures ...........................................................................173
A2.1 Comparison of the Small Angle Scattering and Geochemical Methods ....173
A2.2 SANS/USANS Sample Preparation (extracted from Geoscience Australia Sedimentology Laboratory Operating Procedure) .....................................1741.0 Introduction ......................................................................................1742.0 Purpose .............................................................................................1743.0 Scope ................................................................................................1744.0 Responsibilities ................................................................................1745.0 Hazards .............................................................................................1746.0 Hazard Control Measures and Limitations .......................................1757.0 Procedural Steps ..............................................................................1758.0 Flow Chart ........................................................................................178
A2.3 Introduction to SANS/USANS and its Applications to Source Rock Generation 179Introduction ................................................................................................179Background ................................................................................................179Application to Petroleum Geology ............................................................181Summary ....................................................................................................187References ..................................................................................................187
A2.4 TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Sample Preparation ..................................190
A2.5 TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Method .....................................................190
Appendix 3: Results of Size Fraction Experiments ..................................................193
Appendix 4: Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Definitions ..........................................................195
Appendix 5: TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Results ................................................199
viii
Figures
Figure 1.1 Location of the Browse Basin. .................................................................2
Figure 1.2. Location of Browse Basin wells sampled in the study. ............................3
Figure 1.3 Browse Basin Mesozoic and Cainozoic stratigraphy (after Blevin et al., 1998a). ............................................................................................4
Figure 2.1a Pyrogram (FID) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing resolved S1 and S2 peaks. ..........................6
Figure 2.1b Pyrogram (IR) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing CO2 (top trace) and CO (bottom trace) released during pyrolysis. ........................................................................7
Figure 2.1c Pyrogram (IR) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing resolved CO2 (top trace) and CO (bottom trace) released during oxidation. ..............................................................7
Figure 2.2 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3055-3060 m (#20020131) for raw cuttings sample. ........................................................................................8
Figure 2.3 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3460-3465 m (#20020131) for extracted cuttings sample. ........................................................................9
Figure 2.4 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 2450-2460 m (#20020110) for extracted cuttings sample containing contaminant peaks. .......................9
Figure 2.5 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3055-3060 m (#20020123) for extracted cuttings sample containing contaminant peak. .......................10
Figure 2.6 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3155.2 m (#20020136) for extracted SWC sample. ..........................................................................................10
Figure 2.7 Pyrogram (FID) from Gorganichthys-1, 3420-3425 m (#20010692) for extracted cuttings sample drilled using a water-based mud. ............11
Figure 2.8 Pyrogram (FID) from Gorganichthys-1 4320-4325 m (#20010700) for extracted cuttings sample drilled using a SBM. ...............................11
Figure 3.1 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Brewster 1A sediments (HC indicates samples which contain hydrocarbons). ...........................................................................16
Figure 3.2 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Brewster 1A sediments (HC indicates samples which contain hydrocarbons). ..........17
Figure 3.3 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected sediments in Brewster-1A. ..........................................................................................19
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (a): 11 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2450 m to 2950 m. ..............................................................22
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (b): 9 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3000 m to 3600 m. .............................................................23
ix
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (c): 4 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3695 m to 4230 m. ..............................................................24
Figure 3.5. SANS intensity versus depth at four Q-values of (a) 0.025 Å-1, (b) 0.0025 Å-1, (c) 0.00025 Å-1, and (d) 0.000025 Å-1, which corresponds to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10 µm +/-50%, for cuttings samples from Brewster-1A ...................................................................................25
Figure 3.6. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) with depth for Brewster-1A. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement. .........................................................................................28
Figure 3.7. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (a): 11 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2450 m to 3055 m. (b): 11 samples (claystones, 5m interval each), depth range 3100 m to 4235 m ...................................................29
Figure 3.8. Variation of the pore number density for four selected pore sizes versus depth for Brewster-1A. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text. .................................................................................31
Figure 3.9. Variation of apparent porosity with depth for Brewster-1A. For discussion see text. ..........................................................................32
Figure 3.10 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Carbine-1. ........34
Figure 3.11 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Carbine-1 sediments ......35
Figure 3.12 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected sediments in Carbine-1. ...............................................................................................36
Figure 3.13. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Carbine-1. Data are shown for seven samples (nominally claystones and silty slaystones, 3 m interval each). Depth range is 1349 m to 1559 m. ..................................................................................................39
Figure 3.14. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Carbine-1. .....................................................................................40
Figure 3.15. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Carbine-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement. ........................................................41
Figure 3.16. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Carbine-1. Seven samples (nominally claystones and silty claystones, 3 m interval each), depth range is 1349 m to 1559 m. ........42
Figure 3.17. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Carbine-1. Note the significant decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text. .................................................................................43
x
Figure 3.18. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Carbine-1. For discussion see text. ..................44
Figure 3.19 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Adele-1. .....................................................................................46
Figure 3.20 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Adele-1 samples. ...........48
Figure 3.21 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected samples from Adele-1. ..................................................................................................49
Figure 3.22. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Adele-1. .................................................................................................53
Figure 3.23. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Adele-1. ........................................................................................55
Figure 3.24. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Adele-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement. .........................................................................................56
Figure 3.25. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Adele-1. A: ten samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2530 m to 2980 m. B: nine samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3030 m to 3405 m. ..............................................................57
Figure 3.26. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Adele-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text. .......59
Figure 3.27. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Adele-1. For discussion see text. ......................60
Figure 3.28. Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Argus-1 samples. .......................................................................62
Figure 3.29. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Argus-1. Eight samples (seven claystones and one calcareous claystone, 5 m interval each), depth range 4270 m to 4535 m. ..............................66
Figure 3.30. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Argus-1. .................................................................................................67
Figure 3.31. Vitrinite reflectance and thermal maturity data for extracts and condensates for Argus-1 . ......................................................................68
Figure 3.32. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Argus-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement. ........................................................69
Figure 3.33. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Argus-1. Eight samples (seven claystones and one calcareous claystone, 5 m interval each), depth range is 4270 m to 4535 m. ..........70
xi
Figure 3.34. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Argus-1. ................................................................................71
Figure 3.35. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Argus-1. ...........................................................72
Figure 3.36 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Brecknock South-1. ................................................................................74
Figure 3.37 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Brecknock South-1. ...............................................................................76
Figure 3.38. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brecknock South-1. Ten samples (nominally claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 3530 m to 3995 m. .................................79
Figure 3.39. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Brecknock South-1. ......................................................................80
Figure 3.40. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Brecknock South-1. .......................................81
Figure 3.41. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Brecknock South-1. Ten samples (nominally claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 3530 m to 3995 m. ...............................................82
Figure 3.42. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Brecknock South-1. ..............................................................83
Figure 3.43 Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Brecknock South-1. For discussion see text. ...84
Figure 3.44 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Crux-1 (GA data only). ...............................................................................................86
Figure 3.45 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Crux-1. .............87
Figure 3.46 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Crux-1. .........89
Figure 3.47 SANS absolute intensity curves for samples from Crux-1. .................92
Figure 3.48. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for samples from Crux-1. ..................................................................................................95
Figure 3.49. Vitrinite reflectance versus depth for Crux-1 (after Well Completion Report). ...............................................................................96
Figure 3.50. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Crux-1. ..................................................................................97
Figure 3.51. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples from Crux-1. ......98
Figure 3.52. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Crux-1. ..........................................................................................100
Figure 3.53. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Crux-1. ..........................................................101
xii
Figure 3.54. Interpretation of SANS data for Crux-1. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for samples from Crux-1. ...................102
Figure 3.55 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Dinichthys-1. ..........................................................................104
Figure 3.56 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Dinichthys-1. 105
Figure 3.57 SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Dinichthys-1. ......................................................................................109
Figure 3.58 SANS intensity versus depth at four Q-values of (a) 0.025 Å -1, (b) 0.0025 Å -1, (c) 0.00025 Å -1, and (d) 0.000025 Å -1, which corresponds to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10 µm +/-50%, for cuttings samp ...........................112
Figure 3.59 Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Dinichthys-1. ................................................114
Figure 3.60 Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Dinichthys-1. ...............................................................................115
Figure 3.61 Variation of the pore number density for four selected pore sizes versus depth for Dinichthys-1. . ...........................................................117
Figure 3.62 Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 20 µm) with depth for Dinichthys-1. For discussion see text. .........118
Figure 3.63 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Gorgonichthys-1. ....................................................................119
Figure 3.64 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Gorgonichthys-1. ..................................................................................121
Figure 3.65 SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Gorgonichthys-1. ................................................................................124
Figure 3.66 SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Gorgonichthys-1. ........................................................................126
Figure 3.67 Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Gorgonichthys-1. ...........................................127
Figure 3.68 Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Gorgonichthys-1. ..................................................................................128
Figure 3.69 Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Gorgonichthys-1. ................................................................130
Figure 3.70 Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Gorgonichthys-1. ............................................131
Figure 3.71 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Titanichthys-1. ........................................................................133
Figure 3.72 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Titanichthys-1. ......................................................................................134
xiii
Figure 3.73. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Titanichthys-1. ......................................................................................137
Figure 3.74 SANS intensity versus depth at Q = 0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Titanichthys-1. ............................................................................139
Figure 3.75 Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Titanichthys-1. .............................................140
Figure 3.76 Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Titanichthys-1. .....................................................................................141
Figure 3.77 Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Titanichthys-1. ....................................................................143
Figure 3.78 Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Titanichthys-1. ..............................................144
Figure 4.1 Comparison of pyrolysis data from nearby wells drilled using water-based mud and without glycol additives. ..................................146
Figure 4.2 Comparison of pyrolysis data from near-by wells drilled using different mud systems. Depth is expressed in mSS. ............................147
Figure 4.3 Scattering intensity versus depth (below sea level) for stratigraphic formations in Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. ......................................................................................151
Figure 4.4 Interpretation of SANS data for Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. ...................................................152
Figure 4.5 Scattering intensity versus depth (below sea level) for stratigraphic formations in Brewster-1A, Crux-1 and Adele-1. ................................154
Figure 4.6 Comparison of source rock data from Browse Basin study wells. ......156
In Appendices
Diagram 1.0 Set up of sieving apparatus ..................................................................176
Image 1.0 Sample pot at right, holding jig at left. ...............................................177
Image 2.0 Sample mount in holding jig ready for sectioning. ..............................178
Figure 1 Range of linear sizes that can be observed with various types of neutron optics. ......................................................................................180
Figure 2 Neutron scattering length density for major minerals and organic matter types present in sedimentary rocks. ..........................................181
Figure 3 The comparison of SANS/USANS scattering data for a typical sandstone [24, 25], shale [20, 24] and coal [19]. ...............................182
Figure 4 The comparison of SANS/USANS-derived pore size distribution for a sandstone [23, 24], shale [23, 24], and coal [19]. .......................183
Figure 5. The comparison of SANS/USANS-derived specific surface area for a sandstone [23, 24], shale [23, 24] and coal [19]. .......................184
xiv
Figure 6. The variation of SANS intensity at a single Q-value versus the annealing temperature for an immature hydrocarbon source rock. .....185
Figure 7. A schematic representation of the SANS intensity (for a selected Q-value) versus depth within the hydrocarbon generation window. ....186
Figure 8. The comparison of specific surface area for coals of different rank obtained using SANS and the nitrogen adsorption method. The probe size is 4Å (after Reference 19). ..................................................187
xv
Tables
Table 3.1. XRF raw data for Adele-1. .....................................................................52
Table 3.2. XRF data for Argus 1. ............................................................................65
Table 4.1 Drilling information and depths of lithological units for Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. ............................150
Table A1.1 List of wells studied in this project. ....................................................165
Table A1.2 Samples analysed in this study from Adele-1 ......................................166
Table A1.3 Samples analysed in this study from Argus-1 ......................................166
Table A1.4 Samples analysed in this study from Brecknock South-1 ....................167
Table A1.5 Samples analysed in this study from Brewster-1A ..............................167
Table A1.6 Samples analysed in this study from Carbine-1 ...................................168
Table A1.7 Samples analysed in this study from Crux-1 .......................................168
Table A1.8 Samples analysed in this study from Dinichthys-1 ..............................169
Table A1.9 Samples analysed in this study from Gorgonichthys-1 ........................170
Table A1.10 Samples analysed in this study from Titanichthys-1 ............................171
Table A1.11. Depository sequences for nine wells in the Browse Basin. Part 1 - Geoscience Australia classification of depository sequences. Part 2 - depository sequences as in Well Completion Reports. All depths are in mRT. .........................................................................172
Table A2.1 Comparison of the SAS and geochemical methods. ............................173
Table A3.1 Reproducibility of data for different size fractions for cuttings sample from Brewster 1A, 2750-2755m (#20010658). .......................193
Table A3.2 Reproducibility of data for different size fractions for cuttings sample from Brewster 1A, 3695-3700 m (#20010672). ......................193
Table A3.3 Comparison of data for different size fractions for cuttings samples from Brewster 1A. ..................................................................194
Table A4.1 Definitions of Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (modified after Espitalié et al., 1985; Peters, 1986). ....................................................196
Table A4.2. Guidelines for interpreting (a) source rock generative potential and (b) type of petroleum generated from immature sediments (VR <0.6 %), and, c) degree of thermal maturation (modified after Peters, 1986; Espitalié and Bordenave,1993). ..............................198
Table A4.2a Source rock generative potential (richness) for VR < 0.6 %. ..............198
Table A4.2b Source rock quality for VR < 0.6 %. ....................................................198
xvi
Table A4.2c Source rock thermal maturity. ..............................................................198
Table A5.1 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Brewster-1A. ........................................................................................199
Table A5.2 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Carbine-1. .............................................................................................200
Table A5.3 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Adele-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10). S1 values are invalid. ............................................................................200
Table A5.4 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Argus-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10). S1 values are invalid. ............................................................................201
Table A5.5 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Brecknock South-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10). .................................................................................................201
Table A5.6 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings and side-wall-core samples from Crux-1. S1 values are invalid. ................202
Table A5.7 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Dinichthys-1. S1 values are invalid. .....................................................203
Table A5.8 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Gorgonichthys-1. S1 values are invalid. ...............................................204
Table A5.9 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Titanichthys-1. S1 values are invalid. ...................................................205
1
1. Introduction
The aim of this study was to determine the timing of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion in the Early Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation and Jamieson Formation in the Browse Basin (Figs. 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3) using synergies between classical organic geochemistry and the technique of Small Angle Neutron Scattering.
The tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the Browse Basin and its potential for petroleum generation and entrapment have been studied previously (Struckmeyer et al. 1998, Blevin et al. 1998a). Based on the intra-basin oil-oil and oil-source rock correlation, an effective Lower Cretaceous Petroleum System (Westralian W3 Petroleum System) in the Browse Basin has been postulated (Blevin et al. 1998b).
The study has been performed on rock cuttings and sidewall cores originating from eight recently drilled wells and one older well (Table A1 in Appendix 1). Small Angle Neutron Scattering (Thiyagarajan et al. 1998), Rock-Eval pyrolysis and total organic carbon (TOC) analyses were carried out on 165 organic-rich Jurassic-Cretaceous sedimentary rock samples from nine wells in the Browse Basin (Table A2 in Appendix 1). Out of the total of 165 samples, 47 (22 for Brewster-1A and 25 for Dinichthys-1) were additionally analysed using the Ultra Small Angle Neutron Scattering (USANS) technique (Hainbuchner et al. 2000). Major findings of this work have been published by Radlinski et al. (2004). Geological applications of SANS and USANS are reviewed by Radlinski (2006).
Stratigraphic classification for the Browse Basin wells is at the development stage. Table A1-11 in Appendix 1 lists depositional sequences for the nine wells studied in this work. Uniform classification according to the Geoscience Australia scheme is available for wells Adele 1, Brecknock South 1, Brewster 1A, Crux 1 and Gorgonichthys 1 (part 1 of Table A1-11 in Appendix 1). For wells Argus 1, Carbine 1, Dinichthys 1 and Titanichthys 1 the sequences shown follow the company classification scheme used in Well Completion Reports (part 2 of Table A1-11 in Appendix 1).
The focus of the study was to identify potential source rocks and the depth at which the onset of hydrocarbon generation and saturation of pore spaces occurred within each well. However, in the course of the pyrolysis component of the study two other objectives became apparent: firstly, it was necessary to determine whether or not the organic matter in the (>355 µm, <475 µm) size fraction provided was representative of the whole rock sample; and secondly, because the wells were drilled using a variety of drilling fluids, the effect of the these fluids on the quality of the data had to be ascertained.
2
Figure 1.1 Location of the Browse Basin.
15
14
13
122 123 124 125
Ashmore Platform
Yampi Shelf
Leveque Shelf
KIMBERLEY BASIN
VulcanSub-basin
Londonderry
High
B R O W S E
B A S I N
Caswell Sub-basin
Prudoe
Tce
ied)
Leveque 1
Trochus 1
Buffon 1
Caswell 2
North Scott Reef 1
Circinus 1
Psepotus 1
Scott Reef 2, 2A
Brewster 1A
WA
NT
SA
QLD
NSW
ACTVIC
TAS
03-227-13
Major Palaeozoic fault
Minor Palaeozoic fault
Jurassic fault
Platform of Precambrian / Palaeozoicwith thin (<2 km) Mesozoic cover
Shallow/exposed Precambrian rocksor Proterozoic basin
Late Palaeozoic to Mesozoic basin
Brecknock 1
Barcoo
Sub-basin
EchucaShoals 1Se
ring
apat
am
Sub-
basin
Yampi 2 Gwydion 1
Argus 1
Dinichthys 1
Gorgonichthys 1
Carbine 1
Adele 1
Titanichthys 1
Cornea 1
BrecknockSouth 1
Crux 1
Discorbis 1
Columbia 1A
Asterias 1
Bassett 1A
Heywood 1
3
2. Analytical Procedures
2.1 Samples
A complete list of the samples analysed in this study from the nine Browse Basin wells (Adele-1, Argus-1, Brecknock South-1, Brewster-1A, Carbine-1, Crux-1, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1) are given in Appendix 1. Unless otherwise stated, all depth measurements are given with respect to the rotary table (RT).
The selected sedimentary rock samples comprise side-wall-cores (SWCs) and cuttings (CUTT). Given sufficient quantity of the rock material, each rock sample was divided into three portions (in the priority sequence): one for SANS/USANS, one for geochemistry, and one (archived) for possible future palaeontology work. The geochemistry portion was preserved for future biomarker work.
Figure 1.2. Location of Browse Basin wells sampled in the study.
15
13
122 124
Ashmore Platform
Yampi Shelf
VulcanSub-basin
B R O W S E
B A S I N
Caswell Sub-basin
PrudoeTce
Buffon 1
Caswell 2
North Scott Reef 1
Scott Reef 2, 2A
Brewster 1A
WA
NT
SA
QLD
NSWACT
VIC
TAS
Barcoo
Sub-basin
EchucaShoals 1Se
ring
apat
am
Sub-
basin
Yampi 2 Gwydion 1
Argus 1
Gorgonichthys 1
Adele 1
Titanichthys 1
Crux 1
Dinichthys 1
South 1Brecknock
Brecknock 1
Carbine 1
Londonderry High
KIMBERLEY BASIN
Proterozoic basin
Late Palaeozoic toMesozoic basin
Precambrian /Palaeozoic Platform
04-054-4
Cornea
4
Figure 1.3 Browse Basin Mesozoic and Cainozoic stratigraphy (after Blevin et al., 1998a).
MAASTRICHTIAN
CAMPANIAN
SANTONIANCONIACIAN
CENOMANIAN
ALBIAN
APTIAN
BARREMIAN
HAUTERIVIAN
VALANGINIAN
BERRIASIAN
TITHONIAN
KIMMERIDGIAN
OXFORDIAN
CALLOVIAN
BATHONIAN
BAJOCIAN
AALENIAN
TOARCIAN
PLIENSBACHIAN
SINEMURIAN
HETTANGIAN
NORIAN
CARNIAN
ANISIAN
NAMMALIANSPATHIAN
PLEISTOCENE
PLIOCENE
MIOCENE
OLIGOCENE
Era
Syst
em
AgeMa
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
Seq
BB9
BB7
BB6
BB4
BB5
BB8
BB10
BB11
BB12ABB12B
BB12C
BB13
BB14
BB15BB16
BB17
BB18
BB19
BB20
BB21
BB22Barracouta Fm
Oliver Fm
Cartier Fm
PrionFm
GrebeFm
Bassett Fm
Puffin FmFenelon andGibson Fms
Woolaston Fm
Jamieson Fm
Echuca Shoals
Fm
UpperVulcan Fm
LowerVulcan
Fm MontaraFm
Plover Fm
Nome Fm
Osprey Fm
Series/Epoch/Stage
TR
IASSIC
JUR
ASSIC
CR
ETA
CEO
US
Q
MESO
ZO
ICC
AIN
OZO
ICLitho-
stratigraphy
E
L
M
E
L
M
E
LADINIAN
GRIESBACHIAN
Challis Fm
Pollard Fm
Mt Goodwin Fm
RHAETIAN
TURONIAN
SCYT
HIA
N
EOCENE
PALEOCENE
TER
TIA
RY
L
NEO
GEN
EPA
LA
EO
GEN
E
03-227-16
5
2.2 Analytical Techniques
2.2.1 Small Angle Neutron Scattering and Ultra-small Angle Neutron Scattering
Details of the sample preparation for SANS/USANS can be found in Appendix 2.1. An introduction to the SANS/USANS techniques and its application to source rock generation are presented in Appendix 2.2 and 2.3.
Briefly, samples for SANS/USANS were prepared by gently crushing the rock material and dry-sieving into three fractions <355 µm; 355-475 µm; and >475 µm. The dry sieved 355-475 µm grain size fraction, to be used for the SANS/USANS measurements, was planted in resin and, after curing, two to three 25 mm diameter slices (about 1mm thick and about 0.4mm thick) were cut off with a precision diamond saw. The thick (1 mm) slices were directly used for the SANS measurements and the thin (0.4 mm) slices were used for the USANS measurements. The Standard Operating Procedure for SANS sample preparation is reproduced in Appendix 2.2.
Many of the samples submitted for this project were too small to perform a three-way split. Hence, the left over portion of the size-fractionated sample (355-475 µm) from the SANS preparation was submitted for Rock-Eval pyrolysis and TOC analysis. In a series of independent Rock Eval pyrolysis and TOC measurements it was confirmed that this SANS size fraction yielded the same results as the recombined whole rock sample, as detailed in Appendix 3.
For the small angle neutron scattering a time-of -flight SANS instrument SAND at the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA (Thiyagarayan et al, 1998) and the USANS instrument S18 at the High Flux Reactor in Grenoble, France (Hainbuchner et al., 2000) were used.
2.2.2 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis
The Rock-Eval pyrolysis sample preparation and analytical procedures used in this study are detailed in Appendix 2.4 and 2.5, respectively. Briefly, the dry-sieved sample fractions from wells using water-based drilling muds were powdered and pyrolysed in a Turbo Rock-Eval 6. Samples from wells which were drilled using either ‘Glycol’ or the synthetic-based mud (SBM), Syntech were extracted with the organic solvent mixture methanol:dichloromethane (90:10 and 50:50, respectively) by sonication after crushing to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The sediment was recovered by centrifuging and dried at 40 oC. It was then placed into an oxidized crucible ready for analysis.
2.3 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Size Fraction Experiments
Experiments to determine whether the SANS 355-475 µm sized fraction was representative of the whole rock sample were carried out on Brewster-1A cuttings samples because this well was drilled using a water-based mud, hence erroneous values arising from drilling fluid contaminants were minimised.
6
Rock-Eval pyrolysis was carried out on all three dry-sieved fractions (viz <355 µm; 355-475 µm; and >475 µm) and a recombined whole rock sample over three depth ranges 2750-2755 m (#20010658), 3600-3605 m (#20010671), and 3695-3700 m (#2001072) in Brewster-1A. These samples were chosen to reflect any differences that may occur between the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations, as well as increasing maturity.
The results show that the variation seen between the three different size fractions and the recombined sample is generally within experimental error between repeat samples (see Appendix 3; Tables A3.1 and A3.2). The biggest variation in the results is seen between the Tmax, S3 and TOC values between repeat analyses. Therefore, the 355-475 µm size fraction was deemed representative of the whole-rock sample and used in the pyrolysis experiments.
2.4 Washing Method Experiments
For the samples recovered from wells drilled using glycol additives and synthetic-based muds (SBMs), a method for washing the samples had to be determined to maximise the removal of the contaminants while being practical in terms of laboratory time and use of resources. Initially, the samples were washed in water and then methanol and dichloromethane, prior to crushing and analysis. However, this methodology did not remove the drilling contaminants. Therefore, the extraction method detailed in Appendix 2.4 was employed on the powdered sample.
2.4.1 Pyrograms of Water-based Drilling Mud Samples
On pyrolysis, the cuttings samples from Brewster-1A and Carbine-1, drilled using water-based muds, gave well resolved, individual S1, S2 and S3 peaks, as shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1a Pyrogram (FID) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing resolved S1 and S2 peaks.
7
Figure 2.1b Pyrogram (IR) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing CO2 (top trace) and CO (bottom trace) released during pyrolysis.
Figure 2.1c Pyrogram (IR) from Brewster-1A 3050-3055 m (#20010664) for raw cuttings sample showing resolved CO2 (top trace) and CO (bottom trace) released during oxidation.
2.4.2 Pyrograms of Glycol Contaminated Samples
On pyrolysis, samples from the five wells; Adele-1, Argus-1, Brecknock South-1, Crux-1 and Dinichthys-1 showed contamination by glycol additives in the drilling mud. There are large, multiple S1 and S2 peaks, as shown in Figure 2.2, due to the contaminant compounds adding to, and obscuring, the indigenous free hydrocarbons (S1 peak) and the hydrocarbons cracked from the kerogen (S2 peak) upon pyrolysis.
8
Figure 2.2 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3055-3060 m (#20020131) for raw cuttings sample.
After the solvent extraction, most of the glycol contaminants appear to have been removed from the sample (Fig. 2.3), as well as the free hydrocarbons within the rock. Hence, the S1 peak in the pyrogram is either small or undetected, resulting in the S1 peak being unreliable and consequently all values calculated [viz. Bitumen Index (BI), Production Index (PI)] are also unreliable. The kerogen in the rock is unaffected by the solvent extraction process therefore the S2 peak in the program, and the interpreted Tmax values, should be an accurate measure of the quantity, quality and maturity of the kerogen in the rock, as long as the S2 peak is fully resolved from any remaining contamination.
Although all of the samples were extracted in the same way, the pyrograms of some samples still showed the effects of contaminants (Figs 2.4 and 2.5). The bimodal, and in some cases multimodal, S2 peak results in an anomalously low Tmax value since Tmax is typically assigned to the peak with the greatest height after 300 oC; in this case the first (lower temperature) peak.
The S1 and S2 values are also anomalously high. Despite further extraction, the contaminants remained in some samples. It is undetermined whether the level of contamination in these samples was much greater than the other samples, whether the permeability and/or porosity differed in these samples or that the chemical composition of the contaminant has changed.
Furthermore, comparison of the extracted cuttings samples with those of the extracted sidewall core samples in the Adele-1 and Crux-1 wells (Figs 2.5 and 2.6) show that the glycol additive has had a considerable effect on the pyrolysis values of the cuttings samples with respect to the sidewall core samples of similar depth. Despite the fully resolved appearance of the S2 peak in both the pyrograms, the S2 peak in the sidewall core (Fig. 2.6) has a symmetrical and narrow peak shape, whereas a shoulder remains on the broader S2 peak from the cuttings sample (Fig. 2.5). Effects of this additive appear to be inconsistent but generally result in lower than expected Tmax values, enhanced TOC contents and enhanced S2 values. Depending on the relative increases in the TOC and S2 values, the resultant Hydrogen Index values typically increase.
9
Figure 2.3 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3460-3465 m (#20020131) for extracted cuttings sample.
Figure 2.4 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 2450-2460 m (#20020110) for extracted cuttings sample containing contaminant peaks.
10
Figure 2.5 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3055-3060 m (#20020123) for extracted cuttings sample containing contaminant peak.
Thus, independent of the extraction process, there is an inability to remove all the ‘glycol’ contaminants, which are still contributing to the S2 peak. Therefore, the Rock-Eval pyrolysis results produced for samples obtained from mud systems with glycol additives should either be used with caution, or not at all, when carrying out source rock appraisal.
Figure 2.6 Pyrogram (FID) from Crux-1 3155.2 m (#20020136) for extracted SWC sample.
2.4.3 Pyrograms of SBM Contaminated Samples
On pyrolysis, the samples from the two wells Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 showed contamination by mud additives. In Gorgonichthys-1 the well was drilled using water-based drilling mud to a depth of 3930 m, below this depth the mud system was
11
changed and SBMs were used to the bottom of the well. Titanichthys-1 was also drilled using two mud systems, an initial water-based mud followed by a SBM being used from a depth of 3905 m to the bottom of the well. All of the cuttings samples were powdered and extracted using methanol and dichloromethane (50:50). Figures 2.7 and 2.8 compare the pyrograms for the extracted cuttings drilled using the water-based drilling fluid and the SBM drilling fluid. The S2 peak in the SBM pyrogram is much broader than the sample drilled using the water-based mud, resulting in a low Tmax value.
Figure 2.7 Pyrogram (FID) from Gorganichthys-1, 3420-3425 m (#20010692) for extracted cuttings sample drilled using a water-based mud.
Figure 2.8 Pyrogram (FID) from Gorganichthys-1 4320-4325 m (#20010700) for extracted cuttings sample drilled using a SBM.
12
13
3 Results
TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis
The results for the project are ordered by the type of drilling fluid used in each well (water-based, water-based with glycol additive and SBM-based) and then in alphabetical order of the wells. Pyrolysis data from well completion reports (WCRs) are also included to make the source rock interpretations as complete as possible for each well, to compare the Geoscience Australia’s laboratory data with that of service company data, and compare the data from sidewall cores with that of cuttings, which are inherently more prone to contamination issues.
Definitions of the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters used are given in Appendix 4 Table A4.1 after Espitalié et al (1985) and Peters (1986), with a summary of the criteria used to define a source rock (after Peters, 1986) being listed in Table A4.2.
For a sediment to have hydrocarbon potential, the minimum total organic carbon (TOC) content for a carbonate is taken to be 0.2 % and 0.5 % for a clastic sediment (Table A4.2a), although TOC’s in excess of 2.0 % are typically required for NW Shelf sediments to have the capacity to generate and expel hydrocarbons.
Immature samples often have poorly resolved S1 and S2 peaks, therefore Tmax values less than 380 °C were excluded from the evaluation of hydrocarbon source potential. Low S2 values can arise from adsorption of the produced hydrocarbons on the mineral matrix (Espitalié et al., 1980; Orr, 1983), resulting in an underestimation of the Hydrogen Index. The mineral matrix effect was found to be significant in a previous source rock appraisal of the Browse Basin (Blevin et al., 1998b). Therefore, samples with small S
2 peaks (< 0.2 mg hydrocarbons/g rock) were considered to be unreliable
and hence such samples have been omitted from the assessment of source rocks.
In order to prevent migrated oil and contaminants interfering with the identification of source rocks, samples with anomalously high production indices (PI), and low Tmax values, were excluded from the source rock evaluation sections and included in the discussion of drilling fluids, contaminants and migrated hydrocarbons. The cut-off values applied to the data to allow evaluation of source rocks sensu stricto are as follows; PI ≤ 0.1 for immature (VR ≤ 0.5 %) sediments, 0.1 > PI ≤ 0.25 for early mature (0.5 > VR ≤ 0.8 %), sediments and 0.25 > PI ≤ 0.4 for mature (0.8 > VR ≤ 1.2 %) sediments. Hence, only a proportion of the total number of analyses carried out on sediments from the Browse Basin are shown in some figures.
A brief summary of source richness (TOC, potential yield), source quality (oil- or gas-prone) and kerogen type is given in this report for the formations in each well. The majority of samples chosen in this study come from the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson, Echuca Shoals and Upper Vulcan formations and the Upper Jurassic Lower Vulcan Formation (Fig. 3.1). A few samples from the Lower-Middle Jurassic Plover Formation and the Triassic Mount Goodwin Formation are also included. In this study, a source rock has been assumed to be gas-prone if the Hydrogen Index is below a minimum of 150 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, condensate-prone when the HI is between 150 and 200
14
mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and oil-prone with some gas at higher values. Oil-prone source rocks with HI > 300 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC were not recorded in the Browse Basin samples.
An assessment of thermal maturity was made using a combination of Tmax, PI and vitrinite reflectance (VR). The degree of thermal maturity required for the generation of hydrocarbons depends on the type of organic matter present in the source rock. The Mesozoic succession of the Browse Basin comprises thick Lower Jurassic deltaic to coastal plain sediments, thin Upper Jurassic fluvio-deltaic sediments and a thick sequence of Lower Cretaceous prograding fluvio-deltaic and shallow marine sediments (Blevin et al. 1998a, b). These sediments contain varying proportions of indigenous sapropellic material (disseminated remains of bacteria, algae, acritarchs, dinoflagellates etc) and allochthonous land-plant-derived material. Hence, the predominant type of hydrocarbon-prone organic matter within these sediments ranges from Type II to Type III kerogen. Higher maturities are usually required for the generation and expulsion of hydrocarbons from hydrogen-poor Type III kerogens than for Type II kerogens (see Appendix 4, Table A4.2c), thus:
Kerogen Type VR oil window Tmax oil window
Type II 0.5-1.2 % 435-460 °C
Type III 0.65-1.4 % 440-470 °C
The peak oil window was taken to correspond to vitrinite reflectances between 0.8 and 0.9 %, peak wet gas at VR = 1.2 % and dry gas at VR > 1.6 %. A minimum temperature of 170 °C (VR > 1.2 %) was assumed to be required for the cracking of oil to gas. Sediments in which oxidised organic material (inertinite) or Type IV kerogen is prevalent are considered to be a source of methane and carbon dioxide at high thermal maturities, i.e. within the dry gas window (VR = 1.4-4 %).
SANS and USANS Analysis
The outline of SANS/USANS methodology is given in Appendix 2 (Section A 2.2). The scattering intensity has been measured versus the scattering vector Q for each sample and converted to absolute units. From these data, plots illustrating the variation of the scattering intensity versus depth for several selected pore sizes have been constructed and examined for the existence of characteristic <-shaped patterns, which are indicative of the presence of mobile bitumen within the pores of a particular size. The pore sizes selected for analysis were 100 Å and 860 Å for wells with SANS data only, and 100 Å, 1000 Å, 10,000 Å and 100,000 Å (100 Å = 0.01 µm; 1 µm = 10,000 Å) for wells in which both SANS and USANS data were collected (Brewster-1A and Dinichthys-1). As the pore size range in mudstones extends from about 10 Å to about 40 µm, the presence of bitumen in the pores of the smallest size selected in this work (100 Å) indicates the onset of hydrocarbon generation, whereas the presence of bitumen in the largest pores (10 µm) indicates a significant pore space saturation and an interpreted onset of hydrocarbon expulsion. For wells in which only SANS data are available, only the onset of hydrocarbon generation (if any) could be determined.
15
In a separate measurement using X-ray fluorescence (XRF), the atomic composition of the inorganic rock matrix has been determined for a representative number of samples from every depositional sequence in every well. The organic component of the rock is burnt off during sample preparation for XRF measurements. From the atomic composition, values of scattering length density have been calculated and used in conjunction with the absolutely calibrated SANS/USANS data to determine the pore size distribution for every sample. Then, the variation of pore number density versus depth for several selected pore sizes has been calculated. These data have been used to determine the stability of the pore microstructure versus increased lithostatic load at depth, as well as to detect the possible re-arrangement of the pore space caused by changing rock lithology.
Finally, the variation of apparent SANS porosity versus depth has been deduced. The apparent SANS porosity is a proxy for the real geometric porosity. The two porosities are approximately equal if the pore space is filled with gas or formation water. If bitumen is present in the pore space, the apparent SANS porosity is generally smaller than the geometric porosity.
In the following numerical analysis, it is assumed that the value of SLD for the substance filling the pore space is small compared with the value of SLD for the inorganic rock matrix. In practical terms this assumption works well for brine, saturated hydrocarbons and gas. In the region of liquid hydrocarbon generation, however, the pore space gets filled (at least partially) with bitumen and the SANS characteristics become anomalous, the measured scattering intensity decreases, calculated pore number density decreases, and the calculated porosity decreases. Such anomalies are closely examined to identify regions of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion. This needs to be done with caution, and in conjunction with other geological and geochemical evidence, as there may be other reasons (e.g. overpressure, lithological and organic matter variations) for locally changed microstructural characteristics of the rock matrix.
3.1 Brewster-1A
The pyrolysis data for Brewster-1A is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.1. Figure 3.1 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2, HI and BI) plotted against depth (mKB). Figures 3.2 and 3.3 comprise cross plots of the pyrolysis data by laboratory and by formation, respectively.
In addition to the cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses were also available from previous work by the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (see ORGCHEM, Geoscience Australia’s Oracle-based geochemical database www.ga.gov.au/oracle/apcrc) and Robertson Research (1986). The three data sets appear comparable despite different instruments being used, as shown by Figures 3.1 and 3.2.
3.1.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Brewster-1A was drilled with a water-based drilling mud comprising a brine polymer. The well completion report (Woodside, 1980) documents that diesel was added to the side tracked well at 4464 m. This is at a depth below where the SANS cuttings samples
16
were taken in this study. Therefore, contamination of the cuttings samples by diesel should not be an issue.
Elevated levels in the S1 abundance, low Tmax values, and high Production Index (PI) and Bitumen Index (BI) values within these sediments indicate the presence of free hydrocarbons (annotated by the open symbols in Figures 3.1 and 3.2) throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation over the depth range 3320-3865 m. Two samples within the Jamieson Formation (at 2800 m and 3225 m) may also contain free hydrocarbons. No hydrocarbon staining is evident in the samples analysed by Robertson Research from the Lower Vulcan and Plover formations, even though diesel was added to the drilling mud when the side tracked well penetrated the Plover Formation.
Since these free hydrocarbons occur predominantly within the Echuca Shoals Formation, which is currently within the upper oil window, it is believed that they represent in situ generated hydrocarbons from organic-rich units elsewhere within this formation.
Figure 3.1 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Brewster 1A sediments (HC indicates samples which contain hydrocarbons).
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
VR (%)
HI (mg/g TOC)S2 (mg/g Rock)S1 (mg/g Rock)
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
200 400300100 5001 2 3 4 5 60.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
100
(g)
BI20 40 60 80
14/OA/1766
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Geotrack
Geotrack population 2
Geotrack population 1
AGSO CUTT
Robertson Research CUTT
Robertson Research CUTT HC
AGSO CUTT HC
GA CUTT SANS
GA CUTT SANS HC
Brewster -1A
0 0
000 0
Diesel added
GA sequence
Tertiary
MaastrichtianCampanian
Lower Vulcan Fm
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Santonian-Turonian
GA sequence
Tertiary
MaastrichtianCampanian
Lower Vulcan Fm
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Santonian-Turonian
Diesel added
Diesel added Diesel added Diesel added Diesel added
Plover Fm
Plover Fm
3.1.2 Source Richness
The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of the organic-rich sediments of the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation are fair to good, ranging from 0.5-1.4 % (average
17
TOC = 0.9 %). The Lower Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation source rocks have higher organic richness (range = 1.5-2.7 %; average TOC = 2.1 %; Fig. 3.3).
The potential yields of the Jamieson Formation sediments are poor (average S1+S2 = 1.3 mg hydrocarbons/g rock; Fig. 3.3). The Echuca Shoals source rocks (excluding those samples with apparent free hydrocarbons in them) have slightly higher potential yields (average S1+S2 = 2.7 mg hydrocarbons/g rock; Fig. 3.3).
3.1.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
Source rock quality is measured by the Hydrogen Index (HI). The Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formation sediments have HI values ranging from 26 to 160 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average = 112 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and 105 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, respectively) which indicates that they are presently predominantly gas-prone (Fig. 3.3). The cross plot of HI versus Tmax is routinely used to depict both the type of kerogen present in a source rock and its maturity. Figure 3.3 shows that the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formation sediments contain Type III to Type IV kerogen. Petrographic analyses (Woodside, 1980) show that the kerogen is predominantly inertinite in the samples analysed.
Figure 3.2 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Brewster 1A sediments (HC indicates samples which contain hydrocarbons).
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480(a) (b)
14/OA/1767
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Brewster -1A
Tm
ax (
C)
AGSO CUTT
Robertson Research CUTT
Robertson Research CUTT HC
AGSO CUTT HC
GA CUTT SANS
GA CUTT SANS HC
18
There is a significant discrepancy in the vitrinite reflectance values obtained by the two laboratories Robertson Research and Geotrack (Fig. 3.1). Maturity estimates from the Tmax values places the samples closer to the vitrinite reflectance curve of Geotrack than that of Robertson Research. Therefore, the Jamieson Formation sediments are presently believed to be within the early to peak oil window and the Echuca Shoals Formation sediments are within the upper oil window.
The Upper and Lower Vulcan formations are currently within the wet gas window and the Plover Formation sediments are within the dry gas window. These sediments may have generated liquid hydrocarbons in the past, hence, their present source potential is not discussed. Of note is that the highest gas readings in the well were encountered within the Lower Vulcan Formation (4285 m - 4345 m).
3.1.4 Analysis of SANS and USANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) and Ultra Small Angle Scattering (USANS) analyses were performed on 22 claystone cuttings from the well Brewster-1A (Table A1.5 in Appendix 2). These cuttings were collected at 50 m to 100 m intervals between depths 2450 mRT to 4235 mRT.
Figure 3.4 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
Figure 3.5(a-d) illustrates that there is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This variation is clearly pore-size-dependent, as shown in Figure 3.5(a-d) for four Q-values of 0.025 Å -1, 0.0025 Å -1, 0.00025 Å -1 and 0.000025 Å -1, which correspond to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10µm +/-50%, respectively. (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å).
In Brewster-1A there are two depth intervals which contain bitumen in the small pores, interpreted as evidence for the onset of hydrocarbon generation: the upper Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation. The characteristic <-shaped intensity curve for the upper Jamieson Formation becomes less accentuated (shallower) for the largest pores (Figure 3.5(a-d)). This indicates that there is not enough hydrocarbon volume generated within the source rock to saturate the largest pores as the bitumen is successively replacing the brine from smaller pores toward the larger ones. This microscopic finding is consistent with the relatively marginal global values of TOC and the early to peak oil window maturity estimate in the Jamieson Formation source rocks (sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3).
Within the Echuca Shoals Formation, there is a clear-cut pore-size-dependence of the depth at which the hydrocarbon generation peak is observed, followed, at greater depths, by the oil-to-gas cracking process. For the smallest pore sizes (Figure 3.5(a)), the bitumen saturation signature is strongest at depths near the base of the Jamieson Formation at about 3860 m. As the pore size increases, the position of the bitumen saturation peak shifts upwards through the mid-Formation to the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation near the depth of 3500 m (Figure 3.5 (b-d)). Given the vitrinite reflectance values of the order of 1.2% to 1.4% in the mid-Formation and at the base,
19
respectively, it is most likely that the upward shift of the intensity <-curve is caused by the process of oil-to-gas cracking preferentially taking place in larger pores.
Figure 3.3 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected sediments in Brewster-1A.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Brewster -1A
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Jamieson Formation
Echuca Shoals Formation
Lower Vulcan Formation
Plover Formation
14/OA/1815
Figure 3.1(a) illustrates the variation of vitrinite reflectance with depth, based on data provided in the Well Completion Report. These values were used in Figure 3.5 to provide a conventional indication of source rock maturity at various depths. There
20
are two sets of data provided by two different laboratories (Robertson Research and Geotrack) which are grossly incompatible within the depth interval 3000 m to 4500 m. As discussed in section 3.1.3, the Geotrack data appear to be closer to maturity estimates based on Tmax values than the Robertson Research data.
Figure 3.6 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Brewster-1A. There is little variation (at most 5%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.11x1010cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Brewster-1A.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS/USANS curves (Figure 3.7) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for four pore sizes 0.01µm, 0.1 µm, 1µm and 10µm, indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation for the smallest pore size, and compaction within the Jamieson Formation followed by expansion in the Echuca Shoals Formation for the larger pore size (Figure 3.8). It appears that the onset of the expansion interval for the larger pores coincides with the "K Aptian sandstone member" (3250 to 3311 mRT) of distinct log characteristics and changed lithology (Figure 3.9), intersected near the base of Jamieson Formation. The smooth and only slight variation of the pore number density with depth indicates both a uniform lithology and mechanical stability of the inorganic rock matrix with depth.
Figure 3.9 illustrates calculated porosity (for the very large fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 20 µm) versus depth. Apparent SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the combined SANS/USANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. The apparent SANS porosity values for Brewster-1A lie between 7% and 16%, with a maximum within the Jamieson Formation and at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation (Figure 3.9). In this particular case, the log porosity of 12% reported in WCR within the 3250 m – 3311 m depth interval at the base of the Jamieson Formation remains in good agreement with the SANS/USANS apparent porosity of 13%.
Depth intervals characterised by changed conditions are indicated on the left hand side of the figure. The "K Aptian sandstone member" (3250 m to 3311 m) is characterised by a weak gamma ray signal and low penetration rate. Increased mud density was used throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation, which is indicative of overpressure. The depth interval 4335 m to TD at 4703 m (not sampled by SANS) recorded particularly high levels of gas.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1 nm to about 40 µm across. Combined SANS and USANS methods can access pore sizes from about 2 nm
21
to 20 µm, which covers nearly total porosity. These data can be used to determine all stages of hydrocarbon generation, saturation and expulsion within source rocks.
The microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Brewster-1A (Figure 3.7). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity for all sizes (Figure 3.5) is ascribed to the change of the chemical composition of the organic matter contained in the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast.
As discussed, in Brewster-1A there are two depth intervals which clearly indicate the presence of bitumen in small pores, interpreted as the evidence of the onset of hydrocarbon generation: the upper Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation.
The characteristic <-shape SANS intensity pattern within the upper Jamieson Formation indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation. The largest pores, however, do not appear to be fully saturated which indicates that the upper Jamieson Formation claystones are too organically lean to expel hydrocarbons and become an effective source rock.
The average scattering intensity near the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation appears to exhibit a discontinuity when compared to the adjacent region in the Jamieson Formation, which indicates that there is no communication between the pore spaces of these two sedimentary units. Mud weights indicate overpressuring of the Echuca Shoals Formation (Figure 3.9), which suggests that bitumen and other generated hydrocarbons remain trapped within the formation.
For the smallest pore size, the trend of decreasing intensity throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation terminates at a sandstone unit deposited within the depth range 3940-4173m (Figure 3.5(a). This might indicate that the sandstone reservoirs mobile hydrocarbons generated within the basal Echuca Shoals Formation. However, the upward shift of the intensity <-shape observed for larger pores (Figure3.5(b-d)) suggests another scenario. Given the vitrinite reflectance values of the order of 1.2% to 1.4% in the mid-formation and at the base, respectively, it is most likely that the upward shift of the intensity <-curve is caused by the process of oil-to-gas cracking preferentially taking place within the larger pores. As the oil-to-gas cracking process occurring in restricted volume regions results in a markedly increased pressure of the reaction products, it would indeed be accelerated in such microstructural environments that can facilitate the release of the extra pressure. Therefore, cracking within the larger pores, which are connected to the outside of the relatively tight claystone matrix of the source rock, can occur at lower temperatures than in the smaller, less easily accessible pores. The set of SANS/USANS results presented in Figure 3.5(a-d) is the first direct evidence for the pore size specificity of the oil-to-gas cracking process in the natural environment and has global implications for the modelling of the hydrocarbon generation kinetics.
The USANS results presented in Figure 3.5 (d) show the progressive generation of mobile hydrocarbons within the larger pore network of the upper and lower Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations (increasing scattering intensity trends). The very rapid increase in scattering intensity in the lower Echuca Shoals Formation is interpreted
22
to mark the onset of gas expulsion. As illustrated in Figure 3.5 (e), this interpretation agrees well with the onset of gas expulsion from the geohistory model. Both data sets indicate that all of the source rocks sampled at Brewster-1A are too lean to expel liquid hydrocarbons.
It has been pointed out by one of the referees (Dr Chris Boreham) that an alternative interpretation is possible. It is based on an observation that organic matter with vitrinite reflectance values of 1.2-1.4% may not be mature enough for oil-to-gas cracking to occur and the gas detected by SANS in the pore space might have migrated from deeper, more mature sediments and displaced the liquid hydrocarbons generated in situ. Dr Boreham is also of the opinion that the process of gas-to-oil cracking would be more effective in the small rather than large pores due to greater exposure to heterogeneous catalysis.
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (a): 11 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2450 m to 2950 m.
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.4(a)Brewster-1A (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: 2450 m to 2950 m
2450m2500m2600m2700m2750m2800m2850m2900m2950m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
23
The relatively low scattering intensity at a depth of 4230 m within the Upper Vulcan Formation indicates that the pores contain significant amount of organic matter with a very low hydrogen-to-carbon ratio.
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (b): 9 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3000 m to 3600 m.
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.4(b)Brewster-1A (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: 3000 m to 3600 m
3000m3050m3100m3150m3200m3325m3390m3500m3600m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
24
Figure 3.4. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (c): 4 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3695 m to 4230 m.
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.4(c)Brewster-1A (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 3: 3695 m to 4230 m
3695m3800m3850m4230m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
25
Figure 3.5. SANS intensity versus depth at four Q-values of (a) 0.025 Å-1, (b) 0.0025 Å-1, (c) 0.00025 Å-1, and (d) 0.000025 Å-1, which corresponds to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10 µm +/-50%, for cuttings samples from Brewster-1A.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 5 10 15 20
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.025Å -1 (cm-1)
0.59%
0.61%0.68%
0.73%0.80%0.82%0.92%0.89%0.89%
1.17%
1.19%
1.37%
1.65%
1.74%
vitrinitereflectance:RR KV
0.46%
0.54%
0.54%
0.52%
1.05%
1.03%
1.34%
permeability orkinetics barrier
(a)µ0.01 m
(100Å)
Gas Sst
ONSET
ONSET
ONSET
JAMIESO N
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
26
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
0 5 104 110 5 5 2 105
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.0025Å -1 (cm-1)
3940m
4173m
(b)�0.1 m
(1000Å)
Gas Sst
1.5 10
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 5 107 1 108 8 2 108
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.00025Å -1 (cm-1)
3940m
4173m
permeability orkinetics barrier
(c)�1 m
Gas Sst
1.5 10
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
27
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
0 5 105 105 10 1 1011 11 2 1011
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.000025Å -1 (cm (cm (c -1)
3940m
4173m
permeability orkinetics barrier
(d)
�10 �10 �m�m�
Gas Sst
1.5 10
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
Figure 3.5(e) Comparison of USANS scattering intensity trends with modelled kerogen transformation (TR – Transformation Ratio) and in-situ gas/oil generation and expulsion derived from geohistory and thermal history analysis for Brewster-1A. The good match between the measured Tmax values with the modelled Tmax trend indicates that the thermal and kerogen kinetics models are consistent with the observed pyrolysis data for this well.
0 5 100 5 100 510
1 1011
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.000025Å-1
(cm-1
)
3940m
4173m
µ10 µ10 µmµmµ
Gas Sst
2000
25002500250
30003000300
35003500350
40004000400
4500
DE
PTH
(mR
T)
U Jamieson
M Jamieson
L Jamieson
U Echuca
L Echuca
U VulcanU Vulcan
L Vulcan 8C
L Vulcan 8A
0.0 0.5 400 450 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0ModelledModelledModelleSourceRocks
Volume (bbl equiv/m )2Volume (bbl equiv/m 2Volume (bbl equiv/m
03-227-15
TR Tmax
Robertson ResearchGeoscience AustraliaModelled Tmax
Gas (in situ)Gas (expelled)Oil light (in situ)Oil light (expelled)
28
Figure 3.6. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) with depth for Brewster-1A. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
3.5 4 4.5 5
Brewster-1A, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DE
PT
H (
m)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
29
Figure 3.7. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Brewster-1A. (a): 11 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2450 m to 3055 m. (b): 11 samples (claystones, 5m interval each), depth range 3100 m to 4235 m.
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
10-9
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.1
100 1000 104 105 106
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
(a)2450m2500m2600m2700m2750m2800m2850m2900m2950m3000m3050m
30
100 1000 104 105 106
PORE SIZE (Å)
(b)3100m3150m3200m3325m3390m3500m3600m3695m3800m3850m4230m
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
10-9
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.1PO
RE S
IZE
DITR
IBUT
ION
DENS
ITY
f(r)
31
Figure 3.8. Variation of the pore number density for four selected pore sizes versus depth for Brewster-1A. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-17 10-15 10-13 10-11 10-9 10-7 10-5 10-3 10-1
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
RT)
�� 1 m
(c)r= 10 m �0.1 m �0.01 m
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
32
Figure 3.9. Variation of apparent porosity with depth for Brewster-1A. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
0 5 10 15 20 25CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
3250m3311m
4280m
changed lithology:gamma ray &
penetration ratelog porosity 12%
increasedmud density
4335m
TD 4703m
high gasreadings
Gas Sst
K apt Sst
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
33
3.2 Carbine-1
The pyrolysis data for Carbine-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.2. Figure 3.10 is a compilation of total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figures 3.11 and 3.12 comprise cross plots of the pyrolysis data by laboratory and by formation, respectively. No other data was available for this well.
3.2.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Carbine-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud comprising a brine polymer, therefore contamination of the cuttings samples should not be an issue.
Out of the seven Lower Cretaceous samples analysed from this well, four samples have anomalously low Tmax values, and slightly elevated S1, Production Index (PI) and Bitumen Index (BI) values, indicating the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons within the Jamieson Formation, as annotated by the open symbols in Figures 3.10 and 3.11.
At this location, all of the Lower Cretaceous sediments analysed are immature for hydrocarbon generation, therefore it is believed that these free hydrocarbons are evidence of migration along more permeable zones from more mature sediments.
3.2.2 Source Richness
Only one sample from 1388 m depth in the Jamieson Formation is considered to be a potential source rock and does not contain any migrated hydrocarbons. The other four samples analysed from this formation appear to have higher S1 values than could have been generated from the amount and type of organic matter held within the rock. The sample from 1388 m has a good total organic carbon content (1.6 %) but its potential yield is poor (S1+S2 = 1.9 mg hydrocarbons/g rock; Fig. 3.12).
The Echuca Shoals sediments have very similar total organic carbon contents (average TOC = 1.7 %) and potential yields (average S1+S2 = 1.7 mg hydrocarbons/g rock) to the Jamieson Formation.
3.2.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formation sediments have HI values ranging from between 83 and 118 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average = 118 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and 95 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, respectively) which indicates that they contain Type III kerogen, being at best gas-prone. However, they are presently immature for hydrocarbon generation to occur (Fig. 3.12).
34
Figure 3.10 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Carbine-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(g) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1794
S2 (mg/g Rock)1 2 3 4 5 6
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Carbine -1WRC sequence
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Jamieson FmFenelon Fm
Borde MarlPuffin Sandstone
WRC sequence
Jamieson FmFenelon Fm
Borde MarlPuffin Sandstone
GA CUTT GA CUTT HC
Echuca ShoalsFormation
35
Figure 3.11 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Carbine-1 sediments
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480(a) (b)
14/OA/1795
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Tm
ax (
C)
Carbine -1
GA CUTT SANS
GA CUTT SANS HC
36
Figure 3.12 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected sediments in Carbine-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1816
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Carbine -1
Jamieson Formation
Echuca Shoals Formation
37
3.2.4 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on 7 claystone and silty claystone cuttings from the well Carbine-1 (Table A1.6 in Appendix 2). These cuttings were collected at about 20-50 m intervals between depths 1349 m to 1559 m.
Figure 3.13 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
Except for the out-lying (shallowest) sample at a depth of 1349 m, there is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.14 for scattering intensity measured at Q=0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). The scattering intensity slightly decreases by a factor of 1.2 within the depth range 1388 m to 1478 m in the Jamieson Formation, followed by an apparent sharp decrease by a factor of 1.5 to the Echuca Shoals Formation and thereafter remains relatively constant at a low value down to the TD depth of 1561 m.
According to the Interpreted Lithology section of the Formation Evaluation Log provided by Santos, the sample of cuttings collected within the depth range 1349-1352 m may contain a significant amount of sandstone (cavings?). Consistent lithology is a prerequisite for a successful identification of hydrocarbon generation zones from SANS data. Therefore, results for this sample are shown but treated as anomalous and not taken into account when discussing trends.
Figure 3.15 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Carbine-1. There is little variation (at most 5%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.38x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Carbine-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.16) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å indicates a systematic and significant compaction with depth, but otherwise a consistent pore size distribution in the claystones throughout the Jamieson Formation and Echuca Shoals Formation (Figure 3.17).
Figure 3.18 illustrates calculated porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. Most of the values are between 2.5% and 5%, with a maximum within upper Jamieson Formation. Although the general trend of decreasing porosity with depth is consistent both with general expectation and data presented in Figure 3.17, the calculated SANS porosity values need to be calibrated against the log porosities. Gas readings were fairly high throughout the depth interval 1360 m to 1561 m.
38
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1nm to about 40 µm across. SANS experiments can access pore sizes at the lower end of this range, from about 2 nm to 100 nm, which typically comprise about 30% of total porosity. These data can be used to determine the early stages of hydrocarbon generation and saturation within source rocks.
Owing to significant compaction, the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric also changes significantly throughout the depth range studied by SANS in Carbine-1 (Figures 3.17, 3.18). For the pore size 316 Å, the pore number density decreases by a factor of about 2 within the depth range of 1388-1559 m (Figure 3.17). The SANS intensity for a similar pore size of 250 Å decreases by a similar factor of 1.8 within the same depth range (Figure 3.14). The cause of the apparent marked change in SANS intensity at the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation is not fully understood.
Therefore, it is likely that the observed variation of SANS intensity with depth is dominated by the compaction of the inorganic rock matrix. There is no strong indication of progressive bitumen generation and/or cracking.
The strong deformation of inorganic matrix with depth observed by SANS in Carbine-1 is unusual since these samples are considerably shallower than other samples previously examined by SANS. This deformation with depth is attributed to normal compaction.
39
Figure 3.13. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Carbine-1. Data are shown for seven samples (nominally claystones and silty slaystones, 3 m interval each). Depth range is 1349 m to 1559 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.13Carbine-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depths1349m to 1559m
084 1349m085 1388m086 1439m087 1478m088 1499m089 1517m090 1559m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
40
Figure 3.14. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Carbine-1.
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
16000 100 200 300 400 500
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
FENELON
�0.025 m(250Å)
(cm -1)
PUFFINSANDSTONE
41
Figure 3.15. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Carbine-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Carbine 1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DE
PT
H (
m)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
42
Figure 3.16. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Carbine-1. Seven samples (nominally claystones and silty claystones, 3 m interval each), depth range is 1349 m to 1559 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
089 1517m090 1559m
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
084 1349m085 1388m086 1439m087 1478m088 1499m
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
FENELON
PUFFINSANDSTONE
43
Figure 3.17. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Carbine-1. Note the significant decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEP
TH (m
RT)
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
PUFFI NSANDSTONE
44
Figure 3.18. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Carbine-1. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
PUFFI NSANDSTONE
0 2 4 6 8CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
TD 1561m
1360m
increasedgas reading
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
DEP
TH (m
RT)
3.3 Adele-1
The pyrolysis data for Adele-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.3. Figure 3.19 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figures 3.20 and 3.21 comprise cross plots of the pyrolysis data by laboratory and by formation, respectively.
In addition to the cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses were also available in the well completion report (Shell Development Australia, 1999) carried out on SWCs by Geotechnical Services, and vitrinite reflectance measurements were made by Kieraville Konsultants. There is no mention in the WCR that the SWC samples were washed or extracted using water or organic solvents.
3.3.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Adele-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud with gel and polymer additives to a depth of 2560 m. Below this depth potassium chloride, PHPA and glycol was used to the bottom of the well. All of the cuttings samples analysed are contaminated with glycol
45
additives, and hence they were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10) as part of the preparative procedure.
In the WCR there is no mention that the SWC samples were washed or extracted. From the reported values for S1, it is surmised that these samples have not been solvent washed. Nevertheless, these samples do not appear to be affected by glycol contamination since the Tmax values are not depressed with respect to the extracted cuttings samples. With the possible exception of the shallowest SWC and deepest two SWC samples, migrated or contaminant hydrocarbons are not evident in the SWC samples from the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations in Adele-1 (Fig. 3.19). The samples suspected of containing free hydrocarbons are shown by the open symbols in Fig. 3.19.
Of note, petrographic analyses of a SWC sample from 4130 m (within the Echuca Shoals Formation) reported that this sample contained “possible oil drops that appear to be in artificial composites and may represent contamination”.
46
Figure 3.19 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Adele-1.
Geotech SWC
Geotech SWC HC
GA CUTT SANS extracted
Kieraville SWC
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1763
S2 (mg/g Rock)1 2 3 4 5 6
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Adele -1
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
PloverFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
JamiesonFormation
Santonian - Turonian
Campanian
Maastrichtian
Tertiary
GA sequence
VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
JamiesonFormation
Santonian - Turonian
Campanian
Maastrichtian
Tertiary
GA sequence
VulcanFormation
Invalid data
47
3.3.2 Laboratory Comparisons
In general, the TOC content for the extracted cuttings samples tends to be slightly higher than the SWCs over the depth range analysed (Fig. 3.19). This may be due to the cuttings samples being homogenised compared with the SWC samples, or it may be an artifact introduced from residual glycol contaminants. There are some significant differences in the pyrolysis data between the SWC and extracted cuttings samples. The S1 abundances of the extracted cuttings samples are invalid because any naturally occurring free hydrocarbons (as well as contaminants) are removed during the extraction process, therefore only the S1, BI and PI values from the SWCs can be interpreted. The S2 values of the extracted cuttings samples are less than those of the SWC samples (~1 mg hydrocarbons/g rock) which, combined with the apparent higher TOC values, results in their much lower HI values over the depth range analysed. Since the kerogen in the rock is unaffected by the solvent extraction process, the S2 abundance should be similar for both the cuttings and SWC samples at the same depth. It is difficult to explain this discrepancy but it may be due to the different instruments used or that some contamination is present in the SWCs causing an increase in S2 and HI, which is not apparent in the TOC results. Despite the abundance of the S2 peak being less for the cuttings samples than the SWC samples, the derived Tmax values are comparable between the datasets.
3.3.3 Source Richness
The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of the organic-rich sediments of the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation are consistently fair, ranging from 0.9-1.9% (average TOC = 1.4%; Fig. 3.21). The Lower Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation source rocks have more varied but overall similar organic richness (range = 0.7-2.3%; average TOC = 1.3%).
The potential yields of the Jamieson Formation sediments are poor (average S1+S2 = 2.7 mg hydrocarbons/g rock), whereas some of the Echuca Shoals sediments have fair potential yields (S1+S2 = 3.1 mg hydrocarbons/g rock).
3.3.4 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The Jamieson Formation and Echuca Shoals Formation SWC sediments have similar HI values ranging from between 125 and 270 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average = 186 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and 188 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, respectively) which indicates that they are presently predominantly gas and condensate-prone. Of note is that the HI values from the extracted cuttings samples are somewhat lower (Fig. 3.21). Conventional interpretation of pyrolysis data would imply that samples which have HI values greater 200 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC have the capacity to generate oil. However, in the case of the majority of samples from both the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations in Adele-1, their corresponding TOC contents are typically less than 2 %. At these low-to-moderate TOC levels, any generated oil will probably remain within the source rock and expulsion will not occur until it is substantially cracked to gas at higher maturities.
48
Figure 3.21 shows that the Jamieson Formation and Echuca Shoals Formation sediments both contain Type II/III kerogen. A petrographic analysis of a SWC sample from 2580 m in the Jamieson Formation reports that lamalginite, a hydrogen-rich maceral, is common. The maceral assemblage in the majority of the Jamieson Formation sediments is dominated by liptodetrinite (fragments of spores, cuticles etc) with lesser amounts of inertinite, and vitrinite is a rare occurrence.
Presently, the Jamieson Formation is immature for hydrocarbon generation, the Echuca Shoals Formation is within the oil window, and the Upper Vulcan Formation is at peak oil generation.
Figure 3.20 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for Adele-1 samples.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
Geotech SWC
GA CUTT SANS extracted
(a) (b)
14/OA/1764
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Adele -1
Tm
ax (
C)
Geotech SWC HC
Invaliddata
Invaliddata
49
Figure 3.21 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis cross plots for selected samples from Adele-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Adele -1
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Jamieson Formation (SWC)
Jamieson Formation (CUTT extracted)
Echuca Shoals Formation (SWC)
14/OA/1814
3.3.5 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on 19 claystone cuttings from the well Adele-1 (Table A1.2 in Appendix 2). These cuttings were collected at 25 m to 60 m intervals between depths 2530 m to 3405 m throughout the Upper Heywood Formation.
50
Figure 3.22 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.23 for scattering intensity measured at Q = 0.01Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). The scattering intensity decreases and increases twice with depth by a factor 1.5-1.8 within the Upper Heywood Formation (equivalent to the Jamieson Formation) within the depth range 2530 m to 3405 m, forming a characteristic “double <” pattern. The experimental error of the scattering intensity is of the size of the symbol in Figure 3.23.
Although all the samples used for SANS analysis were described as claystones, the XRF analysis of the shallowest sample (2530 m) reveals the presence of 11.8 wt% of CaO compared to 1.4-2.0 wt% in the remaining four samples analysed by XRF (Table 3.1). Therefore, the data for this sample (and possibly nearby samples) may be anomalous due to a different lithology (calcareous claystone) than for the rest of SANS samples (claystone).
Figure 3.19(a) illustrates the variation of vitrinite reflectance with depth, based on data provided in the Well Completion Report. These values were used in Figure 3.23 to provide a conventional indication of source rock maturity at various depths.
Figure 3.24 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Adele-1. There is little variation (at most 3%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.39x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Adele-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.25) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the Upper Heywood Formation, perhaps with a small anomaly in the depth range 2530-2630 m (Figure 3.26). For the largest pore size (630 Å) the compaction is least evident.
Figure 3.27 illustrates calculated porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the corresponding SANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. The porosity values lie between 2.0% and 4.2%, with maximum values at depths 2530 m, 2885 m and 3380 m. The actual porosity values may not be reliable and need to be calibrated against the log porosities. Depth intervals characterised by changed conditions are indicated on the left hand side of the figure. The “K Aptian sandstone member equivalent” (3414 m to 3595 m) is composed of interbedded glauconitic sandstone, greensand, calcareous sandstone, argillaceous sandstone, claystone and siltstone. Gas and condensate were
51
recovered from the depth of 3514.3 m within this unit. The depth interval 3595 m to TD at 4822 m (Lower Heywood Formation, Upper Swan Formation, Lower Swan Formation, Petrel Formation and Londonderry Formation, all not sampled by SANS) recorded high levels of gas, as indicated in Figure 3.27.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1nm to about 40µm across. SANS experiments can access pore sizes at the lower end of this range, from about 2 nm to 100 nm, which typically comprise about 30% of total porosity. These data can be used to determine the early stages of hydrocarbon generation and saturation within source rocks.
Except for the small anomaly in the depth range 2530-2630 m, the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range of 2530-3405 m studied by SANS in Adele-1 (Figures 3.25 and 3.26). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity with depth (Figure 3.23) is ascribed to the change of the chemical composition of the organic matter contained in the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast.
As discussed above, the low values of the scattering intensity indicate pores filled with bitumen at the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation, and the high values pores filled with gas, formation brine and/or saturated hydrocarbons. Based on this, two regions of hydrocarbon generation (at different maturity) can be identified (Figure 3.23): (1) near the top of the Upper Heywood Formation at a depth of about 2630m, possibly affected by the presence of the microstructural anomaly, and (2) within the lower Upper Heywood Formation at a depth of about 3180 m. The two generation regions are separated from each other by a permeability barrier at a depth of about 2780 m.
The increasing SANS intensity with depth for the two hydrocarbon generation regions within the Upper Heywood Formation indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of the hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation.
The deeper of the two trends of increasing intensity within the Upper Heywood Formation (2630-2880 m and 3220-3380 m) terminates close to a “K Aptian sandstone member equivalent” unit (3414 m to 3595 m), from which gas and condensate were recovered with a FMT tool at the depth of 3514 m. This provides a strong argument that this trend may represent progressive cracking of bitumen into mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores within the K Aptian sandstone member equivalent. The permeability barrier apparent within the Upper Heywood Formation at the depth of 2880 m is likely to impede vertical movement of generated hydrocarbons.
52
Table 3.1. XRF raw data for Adele-1.
AGSO No Loss on SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 SO3
ignition Si Ti Al Fe Mn Mg Ca Na K P S
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
20020065 15.521 45.492 0.63 12 5.538 0.08 1.41 11.8 1.25 2.665 0.119 2.1
20020069 10.065 57.151 0.75 15.2 5.747 0.03 1.76 1.42 1.11 3.489 0.104 1.6
20020073 10.087 58.939 0.66 13.5 6.188 0.04 1.68 1.99 0.75 2.908 0.15 1.6
20020078 9.491 60.145 0.74 15.1 5.401 0.03 1.53 1.56 0.82 3.041 0.128 1
20020083 8.1835 59.598 0.72 14.5 5.8 0.05 1.52 1.57 1.37 3.095 0.146 1.6
AGSO No Sc V Cr Ni Cu Zn Rb Sr Zr Ba Cl
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
20020065 21 147 88 26 34 110 56 298 167 1945 10572
20020069 10 174 88 23 25 144 84 306 165 9651 4834
20020073 12 142 78 29 30 138 83 298 150 10367 3898
20020078 11 137 81 26 24 124 85 201 195 5061 3726
20020083 13 162 92 31 24 126 98 410 173 13706 3589
53
Figure 3.22. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Adele-1. A: ten samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2530 m to 2980 m. B: nine samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3030 m to 3405 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.22(A)Adele-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: 2530m to 2980m
065 2530m066 2580m067 2630m068 2680m069 2730m070 2780m071 2830m072 2880m073 2930m074 2980m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
54
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.22(B)Adele-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: 3030m to 3405m
075 3030m076 3080m077 3130m078 3180m079 3220m080 3280m081 3320m082 3380m083 3405m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
55
Figure 3.23. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Adele-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 100 200 300 400 500
DEPT
H (m
)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1 (cm-1)
UPPER HEYWOOD(JAMIESON)
LOWER HEYWOOD(ECHUCA SHOALS)
UPPER SWAN(UPPER VULCAN)
LONDONDERRY(SAHUL / NOME )
Ro=0.52%
Ro=0.56%Ro=0.53%
Ro=0.56%
Ro=0.63%
Ro=0.62%
Ro=0.67%
Ro=0.87%Ro=0.97%
PETREL (PLOVER)
calcareous?
LOWER SWAN(LOWER VULCAN)
�0.025 m(250 Å )
ONSET
ONSET
56
Figure 3.24. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Adele-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Adele-1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DE
PT
H (
m)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
57
Figure 3.25. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Adele-1. A: ten samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2530 m to 2980 m. B: nine samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3030 m to 3405 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
2530m2580m2630m2680m2730m2780m2830m2880m2930m2980m
58
100 1000PORE SIZE (Å)
3030m3080m3130m3180m3220m3280m3320m3380m3405m
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
59
Figure 3.26. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Adele-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
)
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
UPPERHEYWOOD
(JAMIESON)
LOWERHEYWOOD(ECHUCASHOALS)
UPPER SWAN(UPPER VULCAN)
PETREL (PLOVER)
LONDONDERRY(SAHUL / NOME)
LOWER SWAN(LOWER VULCAN)
60
Figure 3.27. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Adele-1. For discussion see text.
UPPERHEYWOOD
(JAMIESON)
LOWERHEYWOOD(ECHUCASHOALS)
UPPER SWAN(UPPER VULCAN)
PETREL (PLOVER)
LONDONDERRY (SAHUL / NOME)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6POROSITY (%)
calcareous?2527m
3226m
3414m
3595m
4057m
4448m
4822m
claystonedominated lithology
claystone & siltstone
3514.3m; correlated to
"Kapt sandstoneequivalent"
fairlygoodgasreadings
stronggasreadings
h/c recovered
goodgasreadings
LOWER SWAN(LOWER VULCAN)
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
)
3.4 Argus-1
The pyrolysis data for Argus-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.4. Figure 3.28 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT).
In addition to the cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses were also available in the well completion report (BHPP, 2001) carried out on SWCs by Geotechnical Services, and vitrinite reflectance measurements were made by Kieraville Konsultants. There is insufficient data to enable an inter-laboratory comparison.
3.4.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Argus-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud with gel additives to a depth of 2483 m. Below this depth potassium chloride, PHPA and glycol was added to the bottom of the well. Therefore, all of the cuttings samples analysed are contaminated with glycol additives, and hence they were extracted with methanol and
61
dichloromethane (90:10) as part of the preparative procedure. In the WCR there is no mention that the SWC samples were washed or extracted.
With the exception of one SWC sample, all of the samples from the Jamieson Formation contain free hydrocarbons, as indicated by the exceptionally low Tmax values (< 370 oC – off the scale of the graphs in Fig. 3.28). These low values are unreasonable for burial depths of over 4000 m and these hydrocarbons could not have been generated by the organic matter within the sediments. Comparison of the Argus-1 dataset with data from samples with identified free hydrocarbons in the Jamieson Formation at Brewster-1A and Carbine-1 (both drilled with water-based muds), suggests that the anomalous pyrolysis results originate from the incomplete removal of drilling fluid additives in the samples, rather than the occurrence of bona fide thermogenic hydrocarbons within the sediments.
The SWC sample from 4598 m appears to have Tmax and PI values in the range expected for a thermally mature sample, however, it has an anomalously high HI value of 484 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC. This places it outside of the range expected for a mature Type II kerogen, hence glycol contamination is suspected in this sample. Therefore, the quality of the data appears compromised by the addition of additives in the drilling fluid and no source rock interpretation was undertaken.
3.4.2 Maturity
Vitrinite reflectance measurements between 4535 m and 4665.5 m indicate that the Jamieson Formation is within the peak oil to peak wet gas windows (0.85 & 1.13%).
62
Figure 3.28. Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Argus-1 samples.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1798
S2 (mg/g Rock)20
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Argus -1
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
GA CUTT SANS extracted
Kieraville SWC
4 8 12 16
WRC sequence
WRC sequence
Tertiary
Bathurst IslandGroup
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Tertiary
Bathurst IslandGroup
JamiesonFormation
Geotech SWC HC
Invalid data
Most values off scale <370 C
Geotech SWC (suspect data)
Echuca ShoalsFormation
63
3.4.3 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on eight nominally claystone cuttings from the well Argus-1 (Table A1.3 in Appendix 2). These cuttings were collected at 25 m to 40 m intervals between depths 4270 mRT to 4535 mRT. A cut of cuttings was used to perform X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis for selected samples (Table 3.2).
Figure 3.29 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
There is a significant variation of the scattering intensity with depth, well beyond the SANS experimental accuracy of about +/-5% (less than symbol size in Figure 3.29). However, no systematic variation in SANS intensity with depth can be seen within the entire depth range 4270 m to 4535 m. This is illustrated in Figure 3.30 for scattering intensity measured at Q=0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). The scattering intensity fluctuates within the range 200-330 cm-1 throughout the Jamieson Formation and the top of the Vulcan Formation.
Although all the samples obtained from BHP Billiton for SANS analysis have been nominally described as claystones throughout the depth range of 4270 m to 4540 m, the Well Completion Report (WCR) provides detailed information indicating that the actual lithology has a significant calcareous component, gradually decreasing with depth within the depth range 4242 m - 4260 m (cuttings description) or 4242 m - 4290 m (sidewall cores description) at the top of the Jamieson Formation. Therefore, the shallowest SANS sample (4270m) is likely to be a calcareous claystone of different lithology than the remaining SANS samples. Although the CaO content in this sample (7.23%) is not much larger than for the remaining two samples analysed by XRF (7.01% and 4.13% for samples at the depths of 4390 m and 4535 m, respectively, Table 3.2), based on geological evidence it is treated as anomalous in the following discussion.
Figures 3.28(a) and 3.31 illustrate the variation of thermal maturity of the organic matter with depth, based on the petrology and geochemistry data provided in the Well Completion Report. Standard vitrinite reflectance data are reported only for three samples within the depth range 4535-4665.5 m. Thermal maturity indicators, expressed as vitrinite reflectance equivalent (VRe), have been converted from biomarker data (methylphenantrene index, MPI) obtained from three types of samples: mud-filtrate extracts, condensates and mechanical sidewall core (MDCT) extracts. Given their origin, the VRe data are subject to contamination with the mineral oil base present in the drilling fluid (Liquid New Drill) and are reliable only in the relative sense.
Only the petrographic VR values were used in Figure 3.30 to provide a conventional indication of source rock maturity at various depths.
Figure 3.32 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Argus-1. There is little variation (at most 2%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 3.99x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Argus-1.
64
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.33) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth, perhaps with the exception of the 4270 m sample.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the Jamieson Formation and the top Vulcan Formation for the two smaller pore sizes, and a steady but more scattered trend for the largest pore size (Figure 3.34). The shallowest sample near the top of Jamieson Formation (4270 m) appears to be anomalous, which is consistent with its different lithology.
Figure 3.35 illustrates calculated SANS porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the corresponding SANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. The porosity values are about 4.0-5.5% throughout the Jamieson Formation, except for the sample at the depth of 4310 m which has a porosity of 2.8%. The actual porosity values may not be reliable and need to be calibrated against the log porosities.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1 nm to about 40 µm across. SANS experiments can access pore sizes at the lower end of this range, from about 2 nm to 100 nm, which typically comprise about 30% of total porosity. These data can be used to determine the early stages of hydrocarbon generation and saturation within source rocks.
Except for shallowest sample (4270 m), the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Argus-1 (Figures 3.33), perhaps with the exception of the pore size 650 Å, for which a significant scatter is observed (Figure 3.34). The variation of the scattering intensity within the Jamieson Formation for pore size 250 Å (Figure 3.30) does not follow any particular pattern. There is no evidence of progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation. This is consistent with the relatively high thermal maturity of the organic matter within the Jamieson Formation (Figure 3.31).
The scattering intensity is generally low, which indicates that the small pores contain significant amount of organic matter with a very low hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, e.g. residual bitumen.
65
Table 3.2. XRF data for Argus 1.
AGSO No Loss on SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 SO3
ignition Si Ti Al Fe Mn Mg Ca Na K P S
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
20020101 14.698 39.5 0.56 10.37 5.368 0.29 1.45 7.23 1.306 5.229 0.151 5.316
20020104 14.485 41.3 0.53 8.952 4.772 0.12 1.34 7.01 0.929 5.569 0.121 4.794
20020108 12.364 50.3 0.5 8.483 4.231 0.15 1.06 4.13 0.919 6.016 0.102 3.489
AGSO No Sc V Cr Ni Cu Zn Rb Sr Zr Ba Cl
ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
20020101 14 214 78 52 137 181 61 1391 78 58102 24943
20020104 13 220 123 58 156 458 52 1408 77 68875 29177
20020108 14 168 46 36 105 183 54 994 90 48329 32522
66
Figure 3.29. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Argus-1. Eight samples (seven claystones and one calcareous claystone, 5 m interval each), depth range 4270 m to 4535 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.29Argus-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depths4270m to 4535m
101 4270m102 4310m103 4350m104 4390m105 4430m106 4475m107 4510m108 4535m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
67
Figure 3.30. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Argus-1.
4200
4400
4600
4800
50000 100 200 300 400
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1 (cm -1)
JAMIESON
ECHUCA SHOALSABSENT
VULCAN
UNDIFFERENTIATEDVOLCANICS
PLOVERNOT CONFIRMED
top gas 4672m
gas
colu
mn
TD 4878m
weak gas effect3950.5-3952m
1.04%0.85%
1.13%
vitrinitereflectance:
calcareous?
(a) µ0.025 m(250Å)
68
Figure 3.31. Vitrinite reflectance and thermal maturity data for extracts and condensates for Argus-1 .
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
Figure 3.31Argus-1
Maturity vs depthVR% - vitrinite reflectance, VRe% - VR equivalent calculated from
MPI (methyl phenantrene index)Based on geochemistry and petrography data from WCR
VR% cuttings
VRe% filtrate extractsVRe% MSCT extracts
VRe% condensates
VITRINITE REFLECTANCE (%)
SA
MP
LE D
EP
TH
(m
RT
)
69
Figure 3.32. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Argus-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
4200
4250
4300
4350
4400
4450
4500
4550
4600
3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4
Argus 1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
70
Figure 3.33. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Argus-1. Eight samples (seven claystones and one calcareous claystone, 5 m interval each), depth range is 4270 m to 4535 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
4270m
4310m
4350m
4390m
4430m
4475m
4510m
4535m
JAMIESON
ECHUCA SHOALSABSENT
VULCAN
UNDIFFERENTIATEDVOLCANICS
PLOVERNOT CONFIRMED
71
Figure 3.34. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Argus-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEP
TH (m
RT
)
calcareous?r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
JAMIESON
VULCAN
ECHUCA SHOALSABSENT
72
Figure 3.35. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Argus-1. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
VULCAN
0 5 10CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
calcareous?
ECHUCA SHOALSABSENT
03-227-8
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
DEP
TH (m
RT)
3.5 Brecknock South-1
The pyrolysis data for Brecknock South-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.5. Figure 3.36 is a compilation of the total organic carbon and Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figure 3.37 comprises a graph of Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for potential source rock samples. The ten samples analysed span the Middle Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous. No additional source rock or maturity information was available for this well or for the near-by Brecknock-1 well. Hence, none of the Plover, Vulcan, Echuca Shoals and Jamieson formations are adequately represented.
3.5.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Brecknock South-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud with gel, guar gum and Flowzan additives to a depth of 3151 m. Below this depth potassium chloride, PHPA and glycol was used to complete the drilling of this well. Therefore, all of the cuttings samples analysed are contaminated with glycol additives, and hence they were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10) as part of the preparative procedure. As such, the S1 values and values produced from calculations using the S1 peak are unreliable (viz. BI, PI).
Since the samples are extracted, the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons cannot be determined. The deepest sample (3995 m), still contains free hydrocarbons/contaminants despite the extraction process.
73
3.5.2 Source Richness
Given that there is some doubt as to the quality of the pyrolysis data due to the glycol additive remaining in the samples, and the lack of comparative data in adjacent wells, the following interpretation should be viewed with caution, since such contaminants can lead to an over estimation of hydrocarbon potential and an under estimation of thermal maturity.
The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of the two sediments from the Jamieson Formation are fair (average TOC = 0.9%), and good for samples from the Echuca Shoals (average TOC = 1.4% for five samples) and Vulcan (average TOC = 1.3% for two samples) formations. The potential yields of the sediments from Brecknock South-1 cannot be discussed due to the removal of the S1 peak by the preparative processes used to eliminate the glycol contamination.
74
Figure 3.36 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Brecknock South-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
(b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1796
S2 (mg/g Rock)1 2 3 4 5 6
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Brecknock South -1
GA CUTT SANS extracted HCGA CUTT SANS extracted
Top
Bottom
Maastrichtian
Campanian
GA sequence
GA sequence
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Depth
(m
KB)
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Top
Bottom
Depth
(m
KB)
Invaliddata
75
3.5.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The Jamieson Formation apparently has the best source quality with HI values ranging from between 163 and 234 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average HI = 199 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; Fig 3.37). However, the TOC contents in these samples are poor, hence any generated liquid hydrocarbons will probably remain within the source rock and expulsion will not occur until it is substantially cracked to gas a higher maturities. The Echuca Shoals Formation has HI values ranging between 123 and 180 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average HI = 155 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC) which indicates that they are presently predominantly gas and condensate-prone. The Vulcan Formation samples are at best gas-prone (average HI = 121 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC).
Figure 3.37 shows that the Jamieson Formation sediments contain Type II/III kerogen, the Echuca Shoals Formation sediments contain Type III kerogen and the Vulcan Formation sediments contain Type III/IV kerogen.
Estimates of maturity from the Tmax values indicate that the Jamieson Formation sediments are presently immature for hydrocarbon generation, whereas the Echuca Shoals Formation and Vulcan Formation sediments are just within the oil window. Having said this, the Tmax values are lower than expected for the given depth range. This would suggest that glycol additives are still present in the samples despite the extraction process.
76
Figure 3.37 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Brecknock South-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1797
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Brecknock South -1
GA CUTT extracted
Jamieson Formation (GA CUTT SANS extracted)
Echuca Shoals Formation (GA CUTT SANS extracted)
Vulcan Formation (GA CUTT SANS extracted)
Invaliddata
Invaliddata
3.5.4 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on ten nominally claystone cuttings from the well Brecknock South-1 (Table A1.4 in Appendix 1). These cuttings were collected at about 15-45 m intervals between depths 3530 mRT to 3800 mRT, and the deepest sample (fluvial claystone) was recovered from the depth of 3995 mRT.
Figure 3.38 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.39 for scattering intensity measured at Q = 0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). The scattering intensity is practically constant (320-340 cm-1) within the depth range 3530 m to 3585 m in the Jamieson Formation and top Echuca Shoals Formation, followed by an apparent sharp decrease by a factor of 2.6 at the
77
depth of 3675 m in the mid Echuca Shoals Formation and thereafter slightly increases throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation and the Upper Vulcan Formation by a factor of 1.2. The intensity remains at a low value in the Lower Vulcan Formation and at the base of the Plover Formation down to the TD depth of 4008 mRT.
There is a significant log change at the boundary between the Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation at 3575 m, and yet there is no scattering intensity change across the boundary until well within the upper Echuca Shoals Formation. This raises the possibility that the cuttings retrieved from the depth interval 3585 m to 3590 m near the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation (used to prepare SANS sample) might have been contaminated by cavings from the overlying Jamieson Formation.
Although all the samples obtained from Woodside for SANS analysis have been nominally described as claystones throughout the depth range of 3530 m to 3995 m, the Well Completion Report (WCR) provides detailed information indicating that the actual lithology undergoes significant variation with depth. Within the Jamieson Formation (3525-3575 m) the gamma log remains constant, except for a sharp jump at the depth of 3570 m due to the presence of 20% glauconite, followed by a jump at the sequence boundary and formation boundary at the depth of 3575 m. In the depth range 3575 m – 3664 m within the upper Echuca Shoals Formation there is a slight gradual decrease of the gamma signal, followed by a sudden increase in gamma, density and velocity at the depth of 3664 m. The WCR reports a gradual change of lithology to siltstone throughout the depth range 3664 m – 3766 m within the lower Echuca Shoals Formation and throughout the depth range 3776 m - 3779.5 m within the Upper Vulcan Formation, but this is not corroborated by the descriptions of sidewall cores. The only swc successfully retrieved within the Jamieson Formation (3570 m) is described as glauconitic claystone (65% siliceous clay, 35% siliceous silt, 10% siliceous sand) and the lithology of sidewall cores within the depth interval 3576 m to 3773 m (within the Echuca Shoals Formation and the Upper Vulcan Formation) is described as predominantly siliceous clay.
Since the SANS signal from the organic component of the rock is always superimposed on the SANS signal from the inorganic matrix, a consistent lithology throughout the entire depth range is a prerequisite for a successful identification of hydrocarbon generation zones from SANS data [1]. This is particularly accentuated for organic-lean potential source rocks. Therefore, in the following we first analyse the microstructural properties versus depth.
Figure 3.40 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Brecknock South-1. There is little variation (at most 5%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.36x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Brecknock South-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves are presented in Figure 3.41. A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density, proportional to the pore size distribution, with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å (Figure 3.42) indicates a systematic compaction with depth for the pore size 100 Å. For the pore sizes 316 Å and 630 Å, however, the pore number density varies irregularly with depth in a way mirroring the scattering intensity curve (Figure 3.39). Three apparent distinct lithologies can be identified (Figure 3.42). This indicates that
78
SANS intensity is most probably dominated by the lithology-dependent scattering on the inorganic matrix, and any organic input is masked by the inorganic matrix signal.
Figure 3.43 illustrates calculated porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. The values are between 2.0% and 4.7%, with a maximum near the boundary between the Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation. The general trend with depth follows the pattern observed for the scattering intensity (Figure 3.39) and is also most probably dominated by the microstructure of the inorganic matrix. The calculated SANS porosity values need to be calibrated against the log porosities. Brecknock South-1 is a gas/condensate discovery and the gas-water contact and maximum gas reading are indicated in Figure 3.43.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1 nm to about 40 µm across. SANS experiments can access pore sizes at the lower end of this range, from about 2 nm to 100 nm, which typically comprise about 30% of total porosity. These data can be used to determine the early stages of hydrocarbon generation and saturation within source rocks.
Owing to significant lithology variation, the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric also changes significantly throughout the depth range studied by SANS in Brecknock South-1 (Figures 3.42, 3.43). For the pore size 316 Å, the pore number density decreases by a factor of about 3 within the depth range of 3585-3675 m (Figure 3.42). The SANS intensity for a similar pore size of 250 Å decreases also by a similar factor of 2.6 within the same depth range (Figure 3.39).
Therefore, it is likely that the observed marked variation of SANS intensity within the depth interval 3585-3675 m is dominated by the lithology variation of the inorganic rock matrix. The slight increase in scattering intensity throughout the depth interval 3675-3770 m could indicate (1) a slight systematic change of the microstructure of inorganic matrix or (2) progressive expulsion of mobile hydrocarbons. There is no strong indication of progressive bitumen generation and/or cracking.
79
Figure 3.38. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Brecknock South-1. Ten samples (nominally claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 3530 m to 3995 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.38Brecknock South-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depths3530m to 3995m
091 3530m
092 3565m
093 3585m
094 3635m
095 3675m
096 3705m
097 3750m
098 3770m
099 3800m
100 3995m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
80
Figure 3.39. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Brecknock South-1.
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
41000 100 200 300 400 500
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCANUPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
3782m
3810.8m
Reservoirinterval
siliceousclaystone to siltstonetransition
interbedded Clst & Sst
3570m
glauconiticclaystone
3664m
cavings?
�0.025 m(250Å)
(cm -1)
81
Figure 3.40. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Brecknock South-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
3.5 4 4.5 5
Brecknock South-1Scattering length density versus depth
Calculated from XRF data
DE
PT
H (
m)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
average SLD = 4.36x1010(cm-2)
82
Figure 3.41. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Brecknock South-1. Ten samples (nominally claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 3530 m to 3995 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
3530m3565m3585m3635m3675m3705m3750m3770m3800m3995m
83
Figure 3.42. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Brecknock South-1. For the smallest pore size note the significant decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
RT)
LITHOLOGY1
LITHOLOGY2
LITHOLOGY3
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
84
Figure 3.43. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Brecknock South-1. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
0 2 4 6 8CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
maximumgas reading
cavings?
3847m
3944m gas-watercontact
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
DEPT
H (m
RT)
3.6 Crux-1
The pyrolysis data for Crux-1 are given in Appendix 5 Table A5.6. Figures 3.44 and 3.45 are compilations of total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figure 3.44 compares the results for raw and extracted samples, and Figure 3.45 compares extracted data from different laboratories. Figure 3.46 comprises a graph of Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for potential source rock samples.
In addition to the extracted cuttings and SWC samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses for both extracted cuttings and SWC samples were available from the well completion report which were analysed by Geotechnical Services (Nippon, 2001).
Comparison of the TOC contents and pyrolysis data from extracted samples between the two laboratories reveals that the data sets are comparable despite different preparative and analytical methodologies being used (Fig 3.45).
3.6.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Crux-1 was drilled with water-based drilling mud to a depth of 2120 m. Below this depth potassium chloride, PHPA, glycol and Alplex was used to the bottom of the well. All of the cuttings and SWC samples analysed are contaminated with glycol additives, and hence they were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10) as part of the
85
preparative procedure. There is insufficient information in the WCR to determine the method employed to remove the glycol contamination from the cuttings and SWCs that Geotechnical Services analysed but they did solvent extracted the samples, at least with water (see sections 4.5.2 and 4.5.3.2 and table 14; Nippon, 2001).
The effects of the glycol additives on the pyrolysis data for both SWC and cuttings samples are demonstrated in Figure 3.44 from comparison of the extracted and unextracted samples. It is apparent that the glycol additive has had a considerable effect on the pyrolysis values. For example, the glycol additive increases the TOC contents, S1 and S2 values and the calculated BI and HI values. It also decreases Tmax values which may be variable and show inconsistent trends with increasing depth. Hence, the overall source potential could be overestimated and the maturity of the section underestimated if the type of drilling fluid used is not taken into consideration.
After extraction of the sediments with organic solvents (and water in the case of the Geotech-analysed samples), the resultant pyrograms, in most instances, have little or no S1 peaks and well resolved S2 and S3 peaks. This means that the S1 values, and the calculations involving S1 values (BI, PI) are invalid and the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons in the sediments cannot be evaluated. Equally, the other pyrolysis parameters must also be interpreted with caution due to the unreliable nature of the S2 and TOC values. Some samples still had obvious contamination despite multiple extractions and are pronounced in the cuttings samples from to 2390 m to 2650 m (Fig. 3.45), as shown by the open symbols. Below this depth, the Tmax trend shows a fairly uniform increase with depth and the TOC and HI trends increase, albeit in a more erratic manner.
Bearing in mind the limitations imposed because of the glycol contamination, the following interpretations are an approximate guide to the greatest hydrocarbon potential that the sediments in Crux-1 may have, and the minimum thermal maturity that they may have attained. The Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation is not discussed since these extracted samples are still significantly affected by contamination, as highlighted by the exceptionally low Tmax values and high S1 values.
3.6.2 Source Richness
The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of the organic-rich sediments of the Lower Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation and Upper Vulcan Formation source rocks range from fair to good and have an overall fair TOC content (average TOC = 1%). The source rocks of the combined Upper Jurassic Lower Vulcan and Montara formations range from good to very good and have an overall good TOC content (average TOC = 1.2%). The potential yields of the sediments from Crux-1 cannot be discussed due to the removal of the S1 peak by the preparative processes used to eliminate the glycol contamination.
86
Figure 3.44 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Crux-1 (GA data only).
Crux -1
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)
14/OA/1801
S2 (mg/g Rock)S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)300 340 380 420 460
2 4 6 8 10 200 400 600 800
GA CUTT
GA CUTT extracted
GA SWC
GA SWC extracted
GA sequence
GA sequence
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca Shoals FmUpper Vulcan
Formation
Lower VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca Shoals FmUpper Vulcan
Formation
Lower VulcanFormation
Invaliddata
PloverFormation
87
Figure 3.45 Depth plots of TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Crux-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1800
S2 (mg/g Rock)1 2 3 4 5 6
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Geotech SWC washed
GA SWC extracted
GA CUTT extracted
GA sequence
GA sequence
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca Shoals FmUpper Vulcan
Formation
Lower VulcanFormation
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian -Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca Shoals FmUpper Vulcan
Formation
Lower VulcanFormation
Crux -1
Invalid data
PloverFormation
PloverFormation
GA CUTT extracted (HC)
88
3.6.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The Lower Cretaceous Echuca Shoals Formation samples are poor in hydrogen and are at best gas-prone (average HI = 116 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; Fig. 3.46). The Lower Cretaceous-Upper Vulcan sediments have an average HI value of 178 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC indicating that they have the potential to generate both condensate and gas. Likewise, the Upper Jurassic Lower Vulcan Formation and Montara Formation sediments have similar source quality with average HI values of 194 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and 197 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, respectively which indicates that they have the potential to generate both condensate and gas.
Figure 3.46 shows that the Echuca Shoals Formation sediments contain immature Type III/IV kerogen. The Upper and Lower Vulcan formations contain Type II/III kerogen that is presently within the early oil window.
3.6.4 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on 25 claystone and silty claystone cuttings as well as five claystone and silty claystone sidewall cores from the well Crux-1 (Table A1.7 in Appendix 2). The cuttings were collected at 20 m to 80 m intervals between depths 2390 mRT to 3550 mRT.
Figure 3.47 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q. Data for sidewall cores are presented separately in Figure 1C.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.48 for scattering intensity measured at Q=0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). Except for one data point (a sidewall core at a depth of 3471.1 m), there is a good agreement between the intensity values measured from samples of sidewall cores and cuttings
Within the Jamieson Formation, the scattering intensity rapidly decreases by a factor of 1.8 within the depth range 2390 m to 2450 m and then sharply increases by a factor of 1.6 within the depth range 2450 m to 2570 m. This is followed by an abrupt decrease at the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation and than a slight decrease throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation and uppermost Upper Vulcan Formation within the depth range 2600 m to 2691.5 m.
A general decreasing trend, with somewhat scattered data points, is observed within the top Upper Vulcan Formation within the depth range 2775 m to 2990 m, followed by a roughly constant, relatively low value within the depth range 2990 m to 3110 m. At the base of the Upper Vulcan Formation the scattering intensity increases by a factor of 1.3 (3100-3155.5 m). At the top of the Lower Vulcan Formation the scattering intensity returns to a low value and, following the trend exhibited in the mid Upper Vulcan Formation, remains roughly constant throughout the Lower Vulcan Formation, except for one data point (swc) at a depth of 3471.1 m near the base.
89
Figure 3.46 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Crux-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1802
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Geotech SWC
Geotech SWC HC
Echuca Shoals Formation
Upper Vulcan Formation
Lower Vulcan Formation
GA CUTT
GA CUTT extracted
GA SWC
GA SWC extracted
earl
y m
atu
re
Crux -1
invalid data
Invalid data
Figure 3.49 illustrates the variation of the organic matter maturity with depth, using two sets of data: the vitrinite reflectance and FAMM equivalent (CSIRO report in WCR). These values were used in Figure 3.48 to provide a conventional indication of source rock maturity at various depths.
90
Figure 3.50 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Crux-1. There is little variation (at most 3%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.32x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Crux-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.51) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth and that there is little difference between data for sidewall cores and cuttings.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the entire depth interval 2390 m to 3550 m (Figure 3.52) . Superimposed onto this general trend are two anomalies, one located within the Upper Vulcan Formation within the depth range 2690 m to 2850 m and another within the basal Upper Vulcan Formation within the depth range 3110 m to 3200 m.
Figure 3.53 illustrates calculated porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the corresponding SANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. Most of the values are between 1.6% and 3.2%, with a maximum of about 3.2% at the top of the Jamieson Formation.
Crux-1 is a gas discovery well, with a gas cap located within the Nome Formation within the depth range 3635 m to 3884 m (GWC).
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The sizes of the pores found in claystones typically range from 1 nm to about 40 µm across. SANS experiments can access pore sizes at the lower end of this range, from about 2 nm to 100 nm, which typically comprise about 30% of total porosity. These data can be used to identify the early stages of hydrocarbon generation and saturation inside source rocks.
Except for two relatively weak anomalies within the Upper Vulcan Formation (at a depth of about 2800 m and 3150 m), the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Crux-1 (Figures 3.51 and 3.52). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity (Figure 3.48) throughout the Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation is ascribed to the change of the chemical composition of the organic matter contained in the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast.
As discussed above, the low values of the scattering intensity indicate pores filled with bitumen at the onset of hydrocarbon generation, and the high values pores filled with gas, formation brine and/or saturated hydrocarbons. Based on this, three regions of the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation (at different maturity) can be identified (Figure 3.54): (1) within the upper Jamieson Formation at a depth of about 2450 m,
91
(2) at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation at a depth of about 2690 m, and (3) possibly within the Upper Vulcan Formation at a depth of about 3000-3155 m. All three generation regions are separated from each other by barriers, most probably due to low permeability or markedly different thermal kinetics for transformation of organic matter. The increasing SANS intensity with depth for hydrocarbon generation region within the lower Jamieson Formation and at the base of the Upper Vulcan Formation indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation.
The low scattering intensity at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation, as compared to the adjacent region in the Upper Vulcan Formation, indicates that there is no communication between the pore spaces of these two sedimentary units. Claystones within these two units are separated by numerous sandstone layers (up to 10 m thick) intersected within the depth range 2676-2750 m. It is possible that these sandstones reservoir mobile hydrocarbons generated at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation and at the top of the Upper Vulcan Formation.
92
Figure 3.47. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples from Crux-1. (a): 13 samples of cuttings (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2390 m to 2945 m. (b): 12 samples of cuttings (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2990 m to 3550 m. C: five sidewall core samples (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2599.6 m to 3471.1 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.47(A)Crux-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: cuttings 2390m to 2945m
109 2390m110 2450m111 2500m112 2550m113 2570m114 2600m115 2650m116 2690m117 2775m118 2805m119 2850m120 2900m121 2945m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
93
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.47(B)Crux-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: cuttings 2990m to 3550m
122 2990m
123 3055m
124 3110m
125 3150m
126 3200m
127 3270m
128 3325m
129 3359m
130 3400m
131 3460m
132 3500m
133 3550m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
94
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.47(C)Crux-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 3: sidewall cores 2599.6m to 3471.1m
134 swc 2599.6m
135 swc 2691.5m
136 swc 3155.5m
137 swc 3266.6m
138 swc 3471.1m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
95
Figure 3.48. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for samples from Crux-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
40000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
DEP
TH (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å -1
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
MALITA
0.51%
0.79%0.42%
0.44%
0.38%
0.90%0.45%
0.44%
0.57% 0.88%
0.57-0.8%
0.64%
UPPER
LOWER
Sst intervals2750m
2676m
NOME
MATURITY:
Ro% FAMM
0.80%
0.93%
0.98%
1.06%
kinetics orpermeability
barrier
ONSET 2
(cm -1)
µ0.025 m(250Å)
ONSET 3
ONSET 1
96
Figure 3.49. Vitrinite reflectance versus depth for Crux-1 (after Well Completion Report).
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Figure 3.49Crux-1
Vitrinite reflectance versus depthcircles - vitrinite reflectance results
squares - FAMM results
Average VRMinimum Maximum Average FAMMMinimumMaximum
VITRINITE REFLECTANCE (%)
SA
MP
LE D
EP
TH
(m
RT
)
97
Figure 3.50. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Crux-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Crux1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010 cm-2)
98
Figure 3.51. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples from Crux-1. (a): 13 samples of cuttings (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2390 m to 2945 m. (b): 12 samples of cuttings (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2990 m to 3550 m. (c): five sidewall core samples (claystones and silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2599.6 m to 3471.1 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
(a)2390m2450m2500m2550m2570m2600m2650m2690m2775m2805m2850m2900m2945m
99
100 1000
PORE SIZE (Å)
(b)2990m3055m3110m3150m3200m3270m3325m3359m3400m3460m3500m3550m
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1PO
RE S
IZE
DITR
IBUT
ION
DENS
ITY
f(r)
100 1000
PORE SIZE (Å)
(c)
swc 2599.6m
swc 2691.5m
swc 3155.5m
swc 3266.6m
swc 3471.1m
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
100
Figure 3.52. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Crux-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
RT)
(e)
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
UPPER
VULCAN
LOWER
MALITA
NOME
101
Figure 3.53. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Crux-1. For discussion see text.
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
UPPER
VULCAN
LOWER
MALITA
NOME
0 2 4 6 8CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
GWC 3884m
3635m
GAS
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
102
Figure 3.54. Interpretation of SANS data for Crux-1. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for samples from Crux-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
40000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
DEP
TH (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å -1
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
MALITA
0.51%
0.79%0.42%
0.44%
0.38%
0.90%0.45%
0.44%
0.57% 0.88%
0.57-0.8%
0.64%
UPPER
LOWER
Sst intervals2750m
2676m
NOME
MATURITY:
Ro% FAMM
0.80%
0.93%
0.98%
1.06%
kinetics orpermeability
barrier
ONSET 2
(cm -1)
µ0.025 m(250Å)
ONSET 3
ONSET 1
3.7 Dinichthys-1
The pyrolysis data for Dinichthys-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.7. Figure 3.55 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figure 3.56 comprises a graph of Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for potential source rock samples.
In addition to the extracted cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses for cuttings samples (which were analysed by Geotechnical Services) were available from the well completion report (Inpex, 2001a). Vitrinite reflectance measurements were obtained by Kieraville Konsultants.
3.7.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
The well completion report states that Dinichthys-1 was drilled with water-based drilling muds with various additives (KCl, Aquadrill and Pyrodrill). However, both the GA cuttings samples and those analysed by Geotechnical Services appear contaminated by glycol additives, as confirmed by subsequent GC-MS work by Geotechnical Services. The samples analysed in this study were extracted with methanol and
103
dichloromethane (90:10) as part of the preparative procedure. The Geotech-analysed samples were unwashed cuttings.
Comparison of the two laboratory data sets shows that the glycol additive has had a considerable effect on the pyrolysis values (Fig. 3.55). For example, the glycol additive generally (but not always) increases the TOC content, it increases the S1 and S2 values and the calculated BI and HI values. It decreases the Tmax values which may be variable and show inconsistent trends with increasing depth. Hence, the overall source potential could be over estimated and the maturity of the section under estimated if the type of drilling fluid used is not taken into consideration.
After extraction of the sediments with organic solvent, the resultant pyrograms, in most instances, have little or no S1 peaks and well resolved S2 and S3 peaks. This means that the S1 values, and the calculations involving S1 values (BI, PI) are invalid and the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons in the sediments cannot be evaluated. Equally, the other pyrolysis parameters must also be interpreted with caution due to the unreliable nature of the S2 and TOC values.
Bearing in mind the limitations imposed because of the glycol contamination, the following interpretations are an approximate guide to the greatest hydrocarbon potential that the sediments in Dinichthys-1 may have, and the minimum thermal maturity that they may have attained. It must be stated that many samples in Dinichthys-1 still appear to be strongly affected by contamination, as highlighted from the exceptionally low Tmax values and high S1 values, even after multiple solvent extractions. Therefore, the samples evaluated for their hydrocarbon potential are identified with a black dot in Figure 3.55, and only these data are plotted on the Tmax versus HI plot in Figure 3.56.
3.7.2 Source Richness
The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of both the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation and Echuca Shoals Formation samples appear to be good (average TOC = 1.6% and 2.2%, respectively; Fig. 3.56). The potential yields of the sediments from Dinichthys-1 cannot be discussed due to the removal of the S1 peak by the preparative processes used to eliminate the glycol contamination.
3.7.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations range from being gas-prone to having some liquids potential (average HI = 163 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC and 148 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC, respectively). Figure 3.56 shows that the Jamieson Formation sediments contain immature Type III kerogen, and the Echuca Shoals Formation sediments contains Type III kerogen that is presently within the peak oil window.
104
Figure 3.55 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Dinichthys-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 320 360 400 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)400 800600200 1000
14/OA/1803
S2 (mg/g Rock)10
S1 (mg/g Rock)
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Geotech CUTT
GA CUTT
GA CUTT extracted
GA acceptable SR dataKieraville SWC
51 2 3 4 2 4 6 8
440 480280
WCR sequence
Lower Vulcan Fm
Upper Vulcan Fm
Echuca ShoalsFormation
JamiesonFormation
Woolaston Fm
Fenelon Fm
PuffinFormation
Tertiary
WCR sequence
Lower Vulcan Fm
Upper Vulcan Fm
Echuca ShoalsFormation
JamiesonFormation
Woolaston Fm
Fenelon Fm
PuffinFormation
Tertiary
Dinichthys -1
Invaliddata
Plover Fm
Plover Fm
105
Figure 3.56 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Dinichthys-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1804
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Geotech CUTT
GA CUTT
GA CUTT extracted
Jamieson Formation
Echuca Shoals Formation
Dinichthys -1
Invalid dataInvalid data
3.7.4 Analysis of SANS and USANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) and Ultra-small Angle Neutron Scattering (USANS) analyses were performed on 25 claystone cuttings from the well Dinichthys-1 (Table A1.8 in Appendix 2). These cuttings were collected at 50 m to 100 m intervals between depths 2550 mRT to 4350 mRT
106
Figure 3.57 shows the original SANS/USANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This variation is clearly pore-size-dependent, as shown in Figure 3.58(a-d) for four Q-values of 0.025 Å -1, 0.0025 Å -1, 0.00025 Å -1, and 0.000025 Å -1, which correspond to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10 µm +/-50%, respectively (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å).
For the smallest pore size (Figure 3.58(a) the scattering intensity initially increases by a factor of 2 within the depth range 2550 m to 3355m in the Jamieson Formation. The scattering intensity is markedly lower at the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation and it decreases by a factor of 2 within the depth range 3450 m to 3950 m throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation and thereafter remains relatively constant at a low value within the Vulcan Formation.
The characteristic <-shaped intensity curve, visible for the smaller pores within the upper Jamieson Formation, effectively washes out for the largest pores (Figure 3.58(a-d)). This indicates that there is not enough hydrocarbon volume generated within the source rock to saturate the largest pores as the bitumen is successively replacing brine from smaller pores toward the larger ones. This microstructural evidence is consistent with the marginal global values of TOC and the early to peak oil window maturity estimate in the Jamieson Formation source rocks at nearby Brewster-1A well, for which the TOC values are reliable (sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3).
Within the Echuca Shoals Formation, the hydrocarbon generation peak is consistently observed in the depth interval 3850 m – 3950 m, and its position moves slightly to shallower depths with increased pore size. The bitumen generation region is not immediately adjacent to the Berriasian Sandstone (regional reservoir rock in the depth interval 4065 m to 4184 m). The depth of the <-shaped intensity curve is smaller for 10 µm pores than for 1 µm pores (Figures 3.58(d) and 3.58(c), respectively). This indicates that the largest pores may not be fully saturated, which would prevent the expulsion of a significant volume of hydrocarbons from the Echuca Shoals Formation. Given the vitrinite reflectance values of the order of 0.63% to 1.16% in the mid-formation and at the base, respectively, it is most likely that the small upward shift of the intensity <-curve is caused by the process of oil generation preferentially taking place in larger pores.
Figure 3.59 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Dinichthys-1. There is little variation (at most 5%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.40x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Dinichthys-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.60) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth, except at the depth of 3350 m near the base of the Jamieson Formation, where an increased number of larger pores is observed. This anomaly coincides with the “K Aptian sandstone equivalent” region of changed lithology within the depth interval 3340 m – 3424 m (Figure 3.62).
107
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for four pore sizes 0.01 µm, 0.1 µm, 1 µm and 10 µm, indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the Jamieson Formation and slight decompaction throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation, regardless of the pore size (Figure 3.61). The onset of the expansion interval coincides with the different lithology region (Figure 3.62), intersected near the base of Jamieson Formation. The smooth and only slight variation of the pore number density with depth indicates both a uniform lithology and mechanical stability of the inorganic rock matrix with depth.
Figure 3.62 illustrates calculated porosity (for the very large fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 20 µm) versus depth. Apparent SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the combined SANS/USANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. The apparent SANS porosity values for Dinichthys-1 lie between 6% and 14%, with a maximum at the base of Jamieson Formation (Figure 3.62).
Depth intervals characterised by changed conditions are indicated on the left hand side of the Figure 3.62. The "K Aptian sandstone equivalent" (3340 m to 3424 m) is characterised by low gamma ray signal and low penetration rate. Gas readings were fairly high throughout the well, and the depth interval 3700 m to 3750 m recorded a particularly elevated level of gas readings. Significant overpressure was recorded within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
The size of the pores found in claystones typically ranges from 1 nm to about 40 µm across. Combined SANS and USANS methods can access pore sizes from about 2 nm to 20 µm, which covers nearly the total porosity. These data can be used to determine all stages of hydrocarbon generation, saturation and expulsion within source rocks.
Except for the anomaly at the base of the Jamieson Formation (at 3350 m), the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Dinichthys-1 (Figures 3.60 and 3.61). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity (Figure 3.58) is ascribed to the change of the chemical composition of the organic matter contained in the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast. Typically, the low values of the scattering intensity indicate pores filled with bitumen at the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation, and the high values pores filled with gas, formation brine and/or saturated hydrocarbons.
As discussed above, in Dinichthys-1 there are two depth intervals which clearly indicate the presence of bitumen in small pores, interpreted as the evidence of the onset of hydrocarbon generation: the upper Jamieson Formation and the lower Echuca Shoals Formation.
The characteristic <-shape SANS intensity pattern for small pores within the upper Jamieson Formation (Figure 3.58(a) and 3.58(b)) indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation. The largest pores, however, do not appear to
108
be saturated at all which indicates that the upper Jamieson Formation claystones are too organically lean to become saturated, expel hydrocarbons and become an effective source rock for hydrocarbons.
The average scattering intensity for small pores near the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation appears to exhibit a discontinuity when compared to the adjacent region in the Jamieson Formation (Figure 3.58(a) and 3.58(b)), which indicates that there is no communication between the pore spaces of these two sedimentary units. There is evidence of the presence of bitumen in pores of all sizes in the depth interval 3850 m – 3950 m (slightly pore size dependent), but the largest pores are evidently less saturated than the smaller ones (Figures 3.58(d) and 3.58(c), respectively). This indicates insufficient charge volume to fully saturate the pore space of the claystone with hydrocarbons and, therefore, a very limited capacity to expel hydrocarbons.
The relatively low scattering intensity at a depth of 4230 m within the Upper Vulcan Formation indicates that the pores contain significant amounts of organic matter with a very low hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, e.g. residual bitumen.
109
Figure 3.57. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Dinichthys-1. (a): nine samples (claystones, 5m interval each), depth range is 2550 m to 2950 m. (b): nine samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3000 m to 3760 m. (c) four samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), 3850 m to 4190 m.
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.57(a)Dinichthys1 (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: 2550 m to 2950 m
2550m2610m2650m2700m2740m2790m2850m2895m2950m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
110
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.57(b)Dinichthys1 (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: 3000 m to 3760 m
3000m3045m3150m3250m3350m3450m3550m3640m3760m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
111
0.1
10
1000
105
107
109
1011
10-5 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Figure 3.57(c)Dinichthys1 (SANS & USANS)
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 3: 3850 m to 4190 m
3850m3950m4040m4190m
SC
ATTE
RIN
G IN
TEN
SIT
Y (c
m-1
)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
112
Figure 3.58. SANS intensity versus depth at four Q-values of (a) 0.025 Å -1, (b) 0.0025 Å -1, (c) 0.00025 Å -1, and (d) 0.000025 Å -1, which corresponds to four pore sizes of 0.01 µm +/-50%, 0.1 µm +/-50%, 1 µm +/-50% and 10 µm +/-50%, for cuttings samples from Dinichthys-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å -1
Ro=0.50%
Ro=0.53%
Ro=0.59%
Ro=0.61%
Ro=0.64%
Ro=0.63%
Ro=0.63%Ro=0.67%Ro=0.70%Ro=1.16%
Ro=1.23%
Ro=1.48%
Ro=1.78%
4065m4184m
ONSET
ONSET
Gas Sst
permeability orkinetics barrier
5 10 15 20
µ0.01 m(100Å)
(a)
WOOLASTON
JAMIESO N
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
WOOLASTON
JAMIESO N
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWE R
PLOVER
0 5 104 1 105 1.5 105 2 105
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.0025Å -1
4065m
4184mGas Sst
µ0.1 m(1000Å)
(b) 2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
113
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 5 107 1 108 8 2 108
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.00025Å -1
4065m
4184m
1.5 10
Gas Sst
permeability orkinetics barrier
µ1 m
(c)
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
UPPER
LOWER
PLOVER
0 5 1010 1 1011 11 2 1011
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.000025Å-1
4065m
4184mGas Sst
1.5 10
µ10 m
(d) 2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEPT
H (m
RT)
114
Figure 3.59. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Dinichthys-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Dinichthys1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010
cm-2
)
115
Figure 3.60. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Dinichthys-1. (a): 13 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2550 m to 3250 m. (b): nine samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3350 m to 4190 m.
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
10-9
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.1
10 100 1000 104 105 106
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
2550m2610m2650m2700m2740m2790m2850m2895m2950m3000m3045m3150m3250m
(a)
116
10 100 1000 104 105 106
PORE SIZE (Å)
3350m3450m3550m3640m3760m3850m3950m4040m4190m
(b)
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
10-9
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.1PO
RE S
IZE
DITR
IBUT
ION
DENS
ITY
f(r)
117
Figure 3.61. Variation of the pore number density for four selected pore sizes versus depth for Dinichthys-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-15 10-13 10-11 10-9 10-7 10-5 10-3
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
RT)
µµ 1 mr= 10 m µ0.1 m µ0.01 m
JAMIESO N
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
WOOLASTON
118
Figure 3.62. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 20 µm) with depth for Dinichthys-1. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
UPPER
LOWER
WOOLASTON
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
3350m
3340m3424m
4008m
changed lithology:gamma ray &
penetration rate
increasedmud density
3700m3750m
particularlyincreasedgas readings
(h) 2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEP
TH
(m
RT)
3.8 Gorgonichthys-1
The pyrolysis data for Gorgonichthys-1 are given in Appendix 5 Table A5.8. Figure 3.63 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mRT). Figure 3.64 comprises a graph of Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for potential source rock samples.
In addition to the extracted cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses for cuttings samples (which were analysed by Geotechnical Services) were available from the well completion report (Inpex, 2001b). Vitrinite reflectance measurements were obtained by Kieraville Konsultants.
3.8.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Gorgonichthys-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud with gel and polymer additives to a depth of 3940 m. Below this depth Syntech (a synthetic-based mud) was used to the bottom of the well. The cuttings samples analysed by Geotechnical Services were extracted but no details are given in the WCR. However, it is apparent from these data that the Tmax values were anomalously low (Fig. 3.63) and the S2, TOC and HI values were high for samples drilled using the water-based mud, as well as the SBMs. This indicates that other organic compounds (possibly glycol) are also present in the water-based mud. Therefore, all of the cuttings samples analysed in this study
119
were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (50:50) as part of the preparative procedure.
After extraction of the sediments with organic solvents, the resultant pyrograms, in most instances, have little or no S1 peaks and well resolved S2 and S3 peaks. This means that the S1 values, and the calculations involving S1 values (BI and PI) are invalid and the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons in the sediments cannot be evaluated. Equally, the other pyrolysis parameters must also be interpreted with caution due to the unreliable nature of the S2 and TOC values.
Bearing in mind the limitations imposed because of the contamination, the following interpretations are an approximate guide to the greatest hydrocarbon potential that the sediments in Gorgonichthys-1 may have, and the minimum thermal maturity that they may have attained. The samples evaluated for their hydrocarbon potential are identified with a black dot in Figure 3.63, and only these data are plotted on the Tmax versus HI plot in Figure 3.64. It must be stated that there is a reversal in the Tmax trend from the depth that the SBM was added (Fig. 3.63). This indicates that SBM contaminants remain within the cuttings samples in Gorgonichthys-1. Therefore, data from only the samples above 3940 m are interpreted and shown on the Tmax versus HI plot in Figure 3.64.
It must be noted that the WCR report states that coals are present in the Plover Formation at 4500 and 4530 m. This lithology was not represented in the current sampling suite.
3.8.2 Source Richness
The total organic carbon content of samples from the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations appear to range from fair to good with an average TOC of 1.4% and 1.7%, respectively. The potential yields of the sediments from Gorgonichthys-1 cannot be discussed due to the removal of the S1 peak by the preparative processes used to eliminate any contamination.
3.8.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The source quality of the Jamieson Formation ranges from being gas-prone to having the potential to generate oil (range HI = 50-259 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; average HI = 153 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; Fig. 3.3.64). The Echuca Shoals Formation has similar hydrocarbon potential to the aforementioned formation, with HI values ranging from 128 to 264 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average HI = 181 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC). However, in the samples with the highest HI values, the corresponding TOC contents are less than 2%. Hence, any generated oil will probably remain within the source rock and expulsion will not occur until it is substantially cracked to gas at higher maturities.
Figure 3.64 shows that the Jamieson Formation contains immature to marginally mature Type II/III to Type III kerogen, and the Echuca Shoals Formation contains Type II/III to Type III kerogen that is presently within the early oil window.
Figure 3.63 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data
120
for Gorgonichthys-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)
14/OA/1805
S2 (mg/g Rock)8
S1 (mg/g Rock)0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 0
2000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Gorgonichthys -1
340 380 420 460 500
2 4 6
Kieraville
120 220 320 420 520 620 720
GA sequence
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian - Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Lower VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
GA sequence
Tertiary
Maastrichtian
Campanian
Santonian - Turonian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Lower VulcanFormation
GA acceptable SR data Geotech CUTT extracted (SBM) GA CUTT extracted (SBM)
Invalid data
SBM SBM
SBM SBM SBM
PloverFormation
Geotech CUTT extracted (glycol) GA CUTT extracted (glycol)
121
Figure 3.64 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Gorgonichthys-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1806
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Jamieson Formation
Echuca Shoals Formation
Gorgonichthys -1
Immature
Geotech CUTT extracted (SBM)
GA CUTT extracted (SMB)
Invalid dataInvalid data
Geotech CUTT extracted (glycol)
GA CUTT extracted (glycol)
3.8.4 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on 27 claystone cuttings from the well Gorgonichthys-1 (Table A1.9). These cuttings were collected at 50 m to 100 m intervals between depths 2520 mRT to 4770 mRT.
122
Figure 3.65 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner; scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q. On the log-log scale the shapes of scattering curves for all samples appear similar, except for the (small) scattering background in the large-Q region, which groups into two different values. This is an artifact due to slightly different SANS data processing protocols used in December 2001 and May 2002, and it does not affect the scattering intensity in the small-Q region used in the following analysis.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.66 for scattering intensity measured at Q=0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). On this and many subsequent figures, generalised trend lines have been added to aid interpretation. The scattering intensity initially decreases in the depth range 2620 m to 2870 m and then increases by a factor of 2.3 within the depth range 2870 m to 3360 m in the Jamieson Formation. The scattering intensity is markedly lower at the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation and it decreases by a factor of 1.3 within the depth range 3370 m to 3905 m. The scattering intensity remains at a relatively low value throughout the Vulcan Formation, Plover Formation and Mt Goodwyn Formation, down to a depth of 4720 m.
Figure 3.67 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Gorgonichthys-1. There is little variation (at most 2%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.49x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Gorgonichthys-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.68) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth, except at around the depth of 3320 m, near the base of the Jamieson Formation.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100 Å, 316 Å and 630 Å indicates a more complex picture (Figure 3.69). For the two smaller pore sizes there is a systematic slight compaction with depth, but otherwise, there is a consistent pore size distribution in the claystones throughout the Jamieson Formation, Echuca Shoals Formation and Vulcan Formation. The exception is an anomalous region in the lower portion of the Jamieson Formation. For the pore size 630 Å, the initial compaction trend seems to be reversed in the Echuca Shoals Formation and Vulcan Formation, and the extent of the anomalous region within the lower Jamieson Formation is increased.
Figure 3.70 illustrates calculated SANS porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the corresponding SANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. Most of the calculated SANS porosity values are about 4%, with a peak of about 11% at the base of the Jamieson Formation. The calculated SANS porosity values appear high and need to be calibrated against the log porosities. Depth intervals characterised by changed conditions are indicated on the left hand side of the figure. The “K Aptian sandstone equivalent” (3288 m to 3365 m) contains siltstone and sandstone,
123
and shows a low gamma ray signal and a low penetration rate. The depth range 3288 m to 3952 m shows varying, elevated levels of gas. Significant overpressure was recorded within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
Except for the anomaly at the base of the Jamieson Formation within the range 3288 m – 3365 m, the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Gorgonichthys-1 (Figures 3.68 and 3.69). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity (Figure 3.66) is ascribed to the change of the density and chemical composition of the organic matter contained within the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast. As discussed above, the low values of the scattering intensity indicate pores filled with bitumen at the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation, and the high values are indicative of pores filled with gas, formation brine and/or saturated hydrocarbons. Based on this, two regions of present-day onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation (at different maturity) can be identified (Figure 3.66): (1) at depth of about 2800 - 2900 m (within the upper Jamieson Formation) and (2) within the Echuca Shoals Formation at a depth of about 3900 m.
The increasing SANS intensity with depth within the lower Jamieson Formation indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation. The low scattering intensity within the Echuca Shoals Formation, as compared to the adjacent region in the Jamieson Formation, indicates that there is no communication between the pore spaces of these two sedimentary units. Mud weights indicate overpressuring of this unit (Figure 3.70), which suggests that bitumen and other hydrocarbons generated remain trapped within the formation.
The decreasing intensity trend throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation appears to terminate at the top of sandstone intersected within the depth range 3952 – 4115 m, which may indicate that the sandstone reservoirs mobile hydrocarbons generated within the basal Echuca Shoals Formation. The relatively low scattering intensity throughout the Vulcan Formation indicates that the pores contain significant amount of organic matter with a very low hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, e.g. residual bitumen.
124
Figure 3.65. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Gorgonichthys-1. (a): 13 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2520 m to 3220 m. (b): 14 samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3265 m to 4765 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.65(a)Gorgonichthys-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: 2520m to 3220m
676 2520m677 2620m678 2720m679 2780m680 2820m681 2870m682 2920m683 2970m684 3020m685 3070m686 3120m687 3170m688 3220m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
125
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.65(b)Gorgonichthys-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: 3265m to 4765m
689 3265m690 3320m691 3370m692 3420m693 3520m694 3620m695 3720m696 3820m697 3905m698 4120m699 4220m700 4320m701 4720m702 4765m
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
126
Figure 3.66. SANS intensity versus depth at Q=0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Gorgonichthys-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 200 400 600 800
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
MT GOODWYN
Ro=0.54%
Ro=0.51%
Ro=0.51%
Ro=0.50%
Ro=0.59%
Ro=0.61%
Ro=0.75%Ro=0.81%
Ro=1.02%
Ro=1.03%
Ro=1.15%
Ro=1.12%
2481m2536m
3365m
3911.5m
UPPER
LOWER
4218m
TD 4772m
4467m
4718mPLOVER
3952m
4115m
(cm -1)
Gas Sst
µ0.025 m(250Å)
127
Figure 3.67. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Gorgonichthys-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Gorgonichthys1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
128
Figure 3.68. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Gorgonichthys-1. (a): 13 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2520 m to 3220 m. (b): 14 samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3265 m to 4765 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
PORE SIZE (Å)
2520m2620m2720m2780m2820m2870m2920m2970m3020m3070m3120m3170m3220m
129
100 1000PORE SIZE (Å)
3265m3320m3370m3420m3520m3620m3720m3820m3905m4120m4220m4320m4720m4765m
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
PORE
SIZ
E DI
TRIB
UTIO
N DE
NSIT
Y f(r
)
130
Figure 3.69. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Gorgonichthys-1. At shallow depths, note slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction. For full discussion see text.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEP
TH (m
RT)
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
MT GOODWYN
WOOLASTON
131
Figure 3.70. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Gorgonichthys-1. For discussion see text.
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
PLOVER
MT GOODWYN
WOOLASTON
0 5 10 15CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
3322.5m
3288m3365m
3952m
changed lithology:gamma ray &
penetration rate
increasedgas reading
increasedmud density
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
DEP
TH (m
RT)
3.9 Titanichthys-1
The pyrolysis data for Titanichthys-1 is given in Appendix 5 Table A5.9. Figure 3.71 is a compilation of vitrinite reflectance, total organic carbon and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (Tmax, S1, S2 and HI) plotted against depth (mKB). Figure 3.72 comprises a graph of Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for potential source rock samples.
In addition to the extracted cuttings samples analysed in this study, results of Leco TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis analyses for cuttings samples (which were analysed by Geotechnical Services) were available from the well completion report (Inpex, 2001c). Vitrinite reflectance measurements were obtained by Kieraville Konsultants.
3.9.1 Drilling Fluids, Contaminants and Migrated Hydrocarbons
Titanichthys-1 was drilled with a water-based drilling mud with gel and polymer additives to a depth of 3905 m. Correspondence with Inpex suggested that glycol additives were also likely to be present in the water-based muds. Below 3905 m Syntech (a synthetic-based mud) was used to the bottom of the well. Irrespective of the drilling mud used, all of the cuttings samples analysed in this study were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (50:50) as part of the preparative procedure. The cuttings samples analysed by Geotechnical Services were solvent extracted but no details are given in the WCR.
132
Comparison of the datasets from the two laboratories (Fig. 3.71) reveals that the values for TOC and Tmax are comparable, whereas Geotechnical Services recorded higher values for the S1, S2 and HI parameters, indicating that their extraction process has not removed all of the free organic compounds from within the sediments.
After extraction of the sediments with organic solvents, the resultant pyrograms, in most instances, have little or no S1 peaks and well resolved S2 and S3 peaks. This means that the S1 values, and the calculations involving S1 values (BI and PI) are invalid and the presence of naturally occurring free hydrocarbons in the sediments cannot be evaluated. Equally, the other pyrolysis parameters must also be interpreted with caution due to the unreliable nature of the S2 and TOC values.
Bearing in mind the limitations imposed because of the contamination, the following interpretations are an approximate guide to the greatest hydrocarbon potential that the sediments in Titanichthys-1 may have, and the minimum thermal maturity that they may have attained. The samples evaluated for their hydrocarbon potential are identified with a black dot in Figure 3.71, and only these data are plotted on the Tmax versus HI plot in Figure 3.72. It must be stated that there is an offset in the Tmax trend from the depth that the SBM was added (Fig. 3.71). This indicates that SBM contaminants remain within the cuttings samples in Titanichthys-1. Therefore, data from only the samples above 3905 m are interpreted and shown on Figure 3.72.
133
Figure 3.71 Depth plots of vitrinite reflectance, TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data for Titanichthys-1.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
KB)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)800
14/OA/1807
S2 (mg/g Rock)10
S1 (mg/g Rock)
0 0
000
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
2 4 6 2 4 6 8 200 400 600
WCR sequence
Tertiary
PuffinFormation
FenelonFormationWoolaston Fm
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Lower VulcanFormation
WCR sequence
Tertiary
PuffinFormation
FenelonFormationWoolaston Fm
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
Lower VulcanFormation
Titanichthys -1
SBM SBM
SBMSBMSBM
Invalid data
Kieraville
Geotech CUTT extracted (SBM) GA CUTT extracted (SBM)Geotech & GAacceptable SR data
Plover Fm
Plover Fm
Geotech CUTT extracted (glycol) GA CUTT extracted (glycol)
3.9.2 Source Richness
The total organic carbon content gradually increases with depth in Titanichthys-1 until the SBM was used. The samples from both the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson and Echuca
134
Shoals formations appear to range from fair to very good with an average TOC of 1.4% and 2.0%, respectively. The potential yields of the sediments from Titanichthys-1 cannot be discussed due to the removal of the S1 peak by the preparative processes used to eliminate any contamination.
3.9.3 Source Quality, Kerogen Type and Maturity
The source quality of the Jamieson Formation ranges from being gas-prone to having the potential to generate some oil (range HI = 34-412 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; average HI = 232 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC; Fig. 3.72). The Echuca Shoals Formation has similar hydrocarbon potential to the aforementioned formation, with HI values ranging from 122 to 336 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC (average HI = 227 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC). The corresponding TOC contents are around 2 %, hence upon maturation some oil expulsion is predicted.
Figure 3.72 shows that both the Jamieson and the Echuca Shoals formations contain Type II/III, however it is unknown to the extent that the SBM has contributed to the relatively high HI values. From Tmax values the Jamieson Formation is immature to marginally mature, and the Echuca Shoals Formation is presently within the oil window.
Figure 3.72 Tmax versus Hydrogen Index for selected samples from Titanichthys-1.
0 1 2 43 5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(a) (b)
(c)
14/OA/1808
S1 +
S2
(m
g/g
Rock
)
TOC (%)
Good
Very
good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very good
Good
Fair
Oil
Gas
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Immature
Condensatewindow
Oil window
S -enrichment byH/C migration
or contamination
1
1S -depletion byh/c expulsion
Production Index
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tm
ax (
C)
Tmax ( C)
Jamieson Formation
Echuca Shoals Formation
Titanichthys -1
Geotech CUTT extracted (SBM)
Geotech CUTT extracted (glycol)
GA CUTT extracted (glycol)
Invalid data
Invalid data
135
3.9.4 Analysis of SANS data
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) analysis was performed on 20 claystone cuttings from the well Titanichthys-1 (Table A1.10 in Appendix 1). These cuttings were collected at 50 m to 100 m intervals between depths 2450 mRT to 3955 mRT.
Figure 3.73 shows the original SANS data presented in the standard manner: scattering intensity, I(Q) in absolute units, versus the scattering vector Q.
There is a significant and systematic variation of the scattering intensity with depth. This is illustrated in Figure 3.74 for scattering intensity measured at Q = 0.01 Å -1, which corresponds to a pore size of about 0.025 µm +/-50% (1 Å = 10-10 m; 1 µm = 1000 nm = 10,000 Å). The scattering intensity remains roughly constant within the upper Jamieson Formation and then sharply increases by a factor of 1.9 within the depth range 2750 m to 2855 m, followed by a sharp decrease by a factor of 1.3 at the depth of 2900 m. A second sharp increase by a factor of 1.6 occurs in the lower Jamieson Formation within the depth range 3100 m to 3255 m. At the top of the Echuca Shoals Formation the scattering intensity decreases by a factor of 2, down to its original value in the upper Jamieson Formation and remains roughly constant throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation. There is only one data point in the Upper Vulcan Formation with a value 1.2 times higher than the scattering level within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
Figure 3.75 illustrates the calculated values of SLD versus depth for the inorganic component of the rock matrix in Titanichthys-1. There is little variation (at most 5%) with depth and, consequently, the average value of SLD = 4.38x1010 cm-2 was used in subsequent calculations for Titanichthys-1.
The pore size distributions calculated for various depths from the full SANS curves (Figure 3.76) indicate that there is little variation of the geometry of the pore space with depth, except around the depth of 3250m, near the base of the Jamieson Formation, where an increased number of larger pores is observed.
A detailed analysis of the variation of pore number density (proportional to the pore size distribution) with depth for three pore sizes 100Å, 316Å and 630Å indicates a systematic slight compaction with depth throughout the Jamieson Formation and a systematic expansion throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation (Figure 3.77). There is an anomalous region near the base of the Jamieson Formation, coinciding with the “K Aptian sandstone member” (3234 to 3305 mRT) which has distinct log characteristics and a changed lithology.
Figure 3.78 illustrates calculated porosity (only for the fraction of total porosity within the pore size range 20 Å to 1000 Å) versus depth. SANS porosity has been computed by adding pore volumes obtained by fitting the corresponding SANS scattering intensity curve using an assumption that all pores are filled with a fluid of low scattering length density, like brine, gas or saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, the calculated SANS porosity values for depths where pores are filled with bitumen are too low. Most of the values are between 4% and 6.5%, with a peak of about 11.5% at the base of Jamieson Formation. The calculated SANS porosity values need to be calibrated against the log porosities. Depth intervals characterised by changed conditions are indicated on the left hand side of the figure. The “Kapt sandstone member” (3234 m to 3305 m) shows a
136
low gamma ray signal and a low penetration rate. Gas readings were somewhat elevated throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation, and within the depth range 4361 m to 4444 m within the Lower Vulcan Formation (not sampled by SANS), particularly high levels of gas were recorded. Significant overpressure was recorded within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
Significance for hydrocarbon generation
Except for the anomaly at the base of the Jamieson Formation (sample at 3250 m), the microstructure of the inorganic rock fabric changes only slightly throughout the entire depth range studied by SANS in Titanichthys-1 (Figures 3.76 and 3.77). Therefore, the marked variation of the scattering intensity (Figure 3.74) is ascribed to the change of the chemical composition of the organic matter contained in the pores, which affects the neutron scattering contrast.
As discussed above, the low values of the scattering intensity indicate pores filled with bitumen at the onset of hydrocarbon generation, and the high values pores filled with gas, formation brine and/or saturated hydrocarbons. Based on this, three regions of the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation (at different maturity) can be identified (Figure 3.74): (1) within the upper Jamieson Formation at a depth of about 2500 - 2750 m, (2) within the lower Jamieson Formation at a depth of about 2900 - 3050 m, and (3) possibly within the Echuca Shoals Formation at a depth of about 3650 m. All three generation regions are separated from each other by barriers due either to lack of permeability or markedly different thermal kinetics for transformation of organic matter. The increasing SANS intensity with depth for two hydrocarbon generation regions within the Jamieson Formation indicates progressive cracking of bitumen to mobile hydrocarbons and migration of hydrocarbons to larger pores with increasing depth within the formation.
The low scattering intensity within the Echuca Shoals Formation, as compared to the adjacent region in the Jamieson Formation, indicates that there is no communication between the pore spaces of these two sedimentary units. Mud weights indicate overpressuring at the base of the Jamieson Formation below a depth of 3170 m and of the entire Echuca Shoals Formation (Figure 3.78), which suggests that bitumen and other hydrocarbons generated remain trapped within these units. This may not apply to the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation and to the top of the Upper Vulcan Formation, which are in close proximity to the sandstone intersected within the depth range 3969 – 4197 m. It is possible that the sandstone reservoirs mobile hydrocarbons generated at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation and at the top of the Upper Vulcan Formation.
In contrast, the permeability barrier apparent within the Jamieson Formation is likely to impede vertical movement of generated hydrocarbons.
137
Figure 3.73. SANS absolute intensity curves for samples of cuttings from Titanichthys-1. (a): 13 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 2450 m to 3255 m. (b): seven samples (claystones and one silty claystone, 5 m interval each), depth range 3350 m to 3955 m.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.73(a)Titanichthys-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 1: 2450 m to 3250 m
703 2450m704 2550m705 2650m706 2750m707 2800m708 2850m709 2900m710 2950m711 3000m712 3050m713 3100m714 3145m715 3250m
SCAT
TER
ING
INTE
NSI
TY (c
m-1
)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
138
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
105
0.01 0.1 1
Figure 3.73(b)Titanichthys-1
Scattering intensity versus Q for various depthspart 2: 3350 m to 3950 m
716 3350m717 3450m718 3550m719 3650m720 3745m721 3850m722 3950m
SCAT
TER
ING
INTE
NSI
TY (c
m-1
)
SCATTERING VECTOR Q (Å-1)
139
Figure 3.74. SANS intensity versus depth at Q = 0.01 A-1 (corresponding to the pore size 25 nm +/-50%, or 0.025 µm +/-50%) for cuttings samples from Titanichthys-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
45000 200 400 600 800
DEPT
H (m
RT)
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1
WOOLASTON
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
Ro=0.53%
Ro=0.46%
Ro=0.52%
Ro=0.56%
Ro=0.56%
Ro=0.55%
Ro=0.58%
Ro=0.56%
Ro=0.69%
Ro=0.60%
Ro=0.89%
Ro=1.06%
permeability orkinetics barrier
UPPER
LOWER
3967m
4197m
Sst
(cm-1)
µ0.025 m(250Å)
140
Figure 3.75. Variation of the Scattering Length Density (SLD) for thermal neutrons with depth for Titanichthys-1. SLD values were calculated from the elemental composition as determined by a separate X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurement.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Titanichthys1, Browse BasinScattering length density versus depth
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING LENGTH DENSITY (x1010cm-2)
141
Figure 3.76. Pore size distribution at various depths for samples of cuttings from Titanichthys-1. (a): 13 samples (claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range is 2450 m to 3250 m. (b): 12 samples (claystones and claystones plus silty claystones, 5 m interval each), depth range 3350 m to 3950 m.
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
Figure 3.76(a)Titanichthys-1
Pore size distributionpart 1: 2450 m to 3250 m
703 2450m704 2550m705 2650m706 2750m707 2800m708 2850m709 2900m710 2950m711 3000m712 3050m713 3100m714 3145m715 3250m
POR
E SI
ZE D
ITR
IBU
TIO
N D
ENSI
TY f(
r)
PORE SIZE (Å)
3250m
142
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
100 1000
Figure 3.76(b)Titanichthys-1
Pore size distributionpart 2: 3350 m to 3950 m
716 3350m
717 3450m
718 3550m
719 3650m
720 3745m
721 3850m
722 3950m
POR
E SI
ZE D
ITR
IBU
TIO
N D
ENSI
TY f(
r)
PORE SIZE (Å)
143
Figure 3.77. Variation of the pore number density for selected pore sizes versus depth for Titanichthys-1. Note the slight decrease of the pore number density with depth, indicative of compaction.
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
PORE NUMBER DENSITY
DEPT
H (m
RT) JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
3250m
r = 630Å 316Å 100Å
UPPERVULCAN
144
Figure 3.78. Variation of apparent porosity (within the pore size range 2 nm to 100 nm) with depth for Titanichthys-1.
2000
2400
2800
3200
3600
4000
4400
4800
0 5 10 15
Figure 3.78Titanichthys-1
Calculated porosity versus depth in pore size range 2nm to 100nm
DE
PT
H (
mR
T)
CALCULATED SANS POROSITY (%)
JAMIESON
ECHUCASHOALS
VULCAN
2402m
3888m
3305m3234m3305m
3888m
changed lithology:gamma ray &
penetration rate
increasedmud density
4459m
TD 4602m
PLOVER
4274m
UPPER
LOWER4361m4444m
high gasreading
3170m
increasedgas reading
145
4 Discussion: Well Comparisons
The following four sections document the effect of mud additives on pyrolysis and SANS/USANS results and the effect of sample age on SANS/USANS results by comparing adjacent wells. The last section gives an overall summary of the source potential of the formations in the wells examined in this study.
4.1 Pyrolysis results: Adele-1 compared to Brewster-1A
The use of the glycol additive in the drilling fluid does not appear to have affected the TOC and Tmax results from the unwashed SWCs in Adele-1 when compared to the results obtained from Brewster-1A, drilled using a water-based mud without organic additives. This is shown in Figure 4.1, which plots vitrinite reflectance, TOC and pyrolysis parameters versus depth (mSS). However, a relative increase in the S2 and HI values in the SWCs from Adele-1 are apparent.
The integrity of the data from the extracted cuttings samples from Adele-1 which are not compromised by the extraction process (i.e. S2, Tmax and TOC) is comparable with that of the unwashed cuttings samples from Brewster-1A (Fig. 4.1).
4.2 Pyrolysis results: new Ichthys Field wells compared to Brewster-1A
The wells Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1, Titanichthys-1 and Brewster-1A are in close proximity and penetrate similar stratigraphy, therefore an indication of the effect that different drilling fluids have on pyrolysis data can be obtained. Dinichthys-1 was drilled with a glycol additive. The Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 wells were drilled with water-based drilling mud, however glycol additives are suspected, from the top of the well until around 3900 m, from which depth SBM was used.
Figure 4.2 compares TOC and pyrolysis data for extracted cuttings samples (with no apparent contamination) from the wells Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 with cuttings samples from Brewster-1A. No data from samples below 3900 m in Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichtys-1 are plotted, since these samples have obvious contamination from the SBM.
146
Figure 4.1 Comparison of pyrolysis data from nearby wells drilled using water-based mud and without glycol additives. Depth is expressed in mSS.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
SS)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
SS)
VR (%)
HI (mg/g TOC)S2 (mg/g Rock)S1 (mg/g Rock)
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
200 400300100 5001 2 3 4 5 60.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
100
(g)
BI20 40 60 80
14/OA/1809
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)0 0
000 0
Brewster-1A, Geotrack
Brewster-1A, Robertson Research
Brewster-1A, GA & RR CUTT
GA sequence
GA sequence
Lower Vulcan Fm
Campanian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Santonian-Turonian
Lower Vulcan Fm
Campanian
JamiesonFormation
Echuca ShoalsFormation
Upper VulcanFormation
PloverFormation
Santonian-Turonian
Adele-1 Geotech, SWC
Adele-1, Kieraville, SWC
Adele-1, GA CUTT extracted
Although the vitrinite reflectance trends show that the sediments in these wells have obtained comparable levels of thermal maturity, the Tmax values of Gorganichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 are slightly lower, indicating that drilling additives are still present in the cuttings samples despite solvent extraction. The Tmax trend for Dinichthys-1 and Brewster-1A are comparable.
The TOC trends are fairly comparable, with slightly higher values being obtained in Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 over the depth range 2600-3000 m. In general, the S2 and HI values of the extracted samples from Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 are relatively higher than those from Brewster-1A, in particular over the depth range 3000 – 3400 m. Since these two trends do not coincide, residual contamination may remain within the cuttings samples, resulting in the apparent enrichment of their source quality and increased hydrocarbon potential.
147
Figure 4.2 Comparison of pyrolysis data from near-by wells drilled using different mud systems. Depth is expressed in mSS.
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
SS)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Depth
(m
SS)
(a) (b) (c)
(e) (f)
VR (%)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 400 440 480 1 2 3 4 5
HI (mg/g TOC)200 400300100 500
14/OA/1810
S2 (mg/g Rock)1 2 3 4 5 6
0 0
00
Tmax ( C) TOC (%)
Titanichthys-1, Kieraville
Brewster-1A, Geotrack
Gorgonichthys-1, Kieraville
Dinichthys-1, Kieraville
Brewster-1A, GA & RR (water-based)
Dinichthys-1, GA CUTT extracted (glycol)
Gorgonichthys-1, GA CUTT extracted (glycol or SBM)
Titanichthys-1, GA CUTT extracted (glycol or SBM)
148
4.3 SANS results: new Ichthys Field wells compared to Brewster-1A
The geographical proximity and geological similarities between Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 (Figure 1.2 and Table 4.1) enables a meaningful comparison between the corresponding sets of SANS data. Furthermore, owing to the various ages of recovered cuttings and different types of drilling mud used (Tables A1.1 and 4.1), the effect of these factors on the quality of SANS data can be examined. In particular, it is well known that certain types of drilling muds and/or contaminants render the results of some geochemical analyses unreliable and the question arises whether the same is true for SANS results.
Figure 4.3 illustrates the variation of scattering intensity with depth normalised to the sea level datum and measured for the four wells at Q=0.01 Å -1. The general character of the intensity versus depth curve is similar for all four wells: low intensity near the top of the Jamieson Formation, a rapid increase towards a maximum value near the base of the Jamieson Formation, a sharp decrease at the top of Echuca Shoals Formation and gradually decreasing values throughout the Echuca Shoals Formation, with local increase at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation and top of Vulcan Formation (for Titanichthys-1 and Dinichthys-1 only). For Brewster-1A and Titanichthys-1 there is an additional rapid increase - sharp decrease intra-Jamieson cycle.
In Section 3 of this report it is demonstrated that for each individual well the pore number density for pore sizes of about 250 Å does not vary significantly with depth except for the narrow region at the base of the Jamieson Formation (61 m to 84 m thick “K Aptian sandstone member” or “K Aptian sandstone member equivalent”). Bitumen has a scattering length density much larger than brine or gas, and being rather similar to that of the rock matrix, which results in the loss of scattering contrast. Therefore, low values of scattering intensity are interpreted as being caused by the presence of generated bitumen in the pore space. Based on this interpretation, depths of the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation and expulsion to larger pores (referred to as “onset” below) predicted by SANS are marked in Figure 4.4.
The first onset identified by SANS is located at the top of Jamieson Formation within the depth range 2500 m (Dinichthys-1) to 2900 m (Gorgonichthys-1), depending on the well. In this depth region the vitrinite reflectance values are in the range 0.5% (Dinichthys-1) to 0.54% (Brewster-1A, Keiraville data).
The second onset was identified only in Titanichthys-1 and Brewster-1A and is located in the mid Jamieson Formation within the depth range 2900 – 3100 m. In this depth region the vitrinite reflectance values are in the range 0.52%-0.56% for Titanichthys-1 and 0.54% for Brewster-1A (Keiraville data).
The third onset identified by SANS is located either in the lower Echuca Shoals Formation (Titanichthys-1), basal Echuca Shoals Formation (Dinichthys-1) or the uppermost Vulcan Formation (Gorgonichthys-1 and Brewster-1A) within the depth range 3650 – 3950 m. In this depth region the vitrinite reflectance values are widely spread in the range 0.56% (Titanichthys-1) to 1.03% (Brewster-1A, Gorgonichthys-1).
149
The existence of two (three for Titanichthys-1 and Brewster-1A) SANS-identified onsets of mobile hydrocarbon generation and expulsion to larger pores is interpreted to be due to markedly different kinetics for thermal maturation of organic matter deposited in each of the two (three) hydrocarbon generation units (source rocks).
The overall magnitude of the scattering intensity versus depth is similar for Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1, and for Brewster-1A and Dinichthys-1. The absolute SANS intensity differs between these two groups of wells by a factor of two (Figure 4.3), whereas the experimental error for the absolute intensity does not exceed 10% absolute and is much less in relative terms.
The close similarity between SANS data for Brewster-1A (spudded in 1980) and Dinichthys-1 (spudded in 2000) indicates that ageing (weathering) of cuttings stored in sealed plastic bags over a period of many years is most likely not an issue for SANS. This is a very important finding, as it demonstrates that SANS data taken on old cuttings can be reliable. It is possible, however, that the significant scatter of SANS data for Brewster-1A within the Echuca Shoals Formation may be caused by the particle-size-specific ageing of the cuttings, and more specifically may be related to the size variation of the original cuttings particles used for SANS sample preparations. The original cuttings size was not monitored in this work.
The similarity of the SANS data for Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1, as opposed to Dinichthys-1, all spudded in 2000, can by interpreted in several ways. Firstly, one reason could be purely geochemical and has to do with differences in the hydrocarbon generation process and/or the composition of bitumen expelled into the pore space. Secondly, the potential influence of the type of drilling mud on the SANS signal needs to be considered. Brewster-1A and Dinichthys-1 were drilled using sea-water based muds, whereas Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1 were drilled using synthetic based muds. Although it is unlikely that mud particles could significantly penetrate 150 Å diameter pores in cuttings, such a possibility cannot be entirely discarded.
Out of the four wells, Brewster-1A and Titanichthys-1 are geographically closest to each other (about 5 km). Although they exhibit markedly different SANS intensities, in both wells an intra-Jamieson permeability/kinetics barrier is observed at a depth of about 2900 mRT. There is no indication of such a barrier in Dinichthys-1 and Gorgonichthys-1.
150
Table 4.1 Drilling information and depths of lithological units for Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1.
Formation Brewster-1A Dinichthys-1 Gorgonichthys-1
Titanichthys-1
Water Depth (m) 256 263.6 260 247
RT (m) 8 26.4 26.4 26.4
TD (mRT) 4703 4562 4772 4602
Drilling Mud Salt/Polymer Aquadrill/Pyrodrill
Syntec (SBM) Syntec (SBM)
below 2366 mRT
below 2471 mRT below 2405 mRT
below 2337 mRT
Mud contaminants
diesel fuel glycol, alkenes
Spud Date 23-May-80 3-Mar-00 23-May-00 26-Sep-00
Top Woolaston 2484 2481 2326
(mRT) Jamieson 2430 2516 2536 2402
Echuca Shoals 3311 3424 3365 3305
Upper Vulcan 3863 4008 3911.5 3888
Lower Vulcan 4280 4204.5 4218 4274
Plover 4453 4418.5 4467 4459
Top Woolaston 2457.6 2454.6 2299.6
(m below Jamieson 2422 2489.6 2509.6 2375.6
sea level) Echuca Shoals 3303 3424 3338.6 3278.6
Upper Vulcan 3855 3397.6 3885.1 3861.6
Lower Vulcan 4272 4178.1 4191.6 4247.6
Plover 4445 4392.1 4440.6 4432.6
Thickness (m) Woolaston 32 55 76
Jamieson 881 908 829 903
Echuca Shoals 552 584 546.5 583
Upper Vulcan 417 196.5 306.5 386
Lower Vulcan 173 214 249 185
Plover >250 >143.5 251 >143
151
Figure 4.3. Scattering intensity versus depth (below sea level) for stratigraphic formations in Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1.
0 200 400 600 800
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1
DEP
TH (m
bel
ow s
ea le
vel)
(cm-1)
Br JamiesonBr Echuca ShoalsBr Upper VulcanDi JamiesonDi Echuca ShoalsDi Upper VulcanDi Lower VulcanGo WoolastonGo JamiesonGo Echuca ShoalsGo Upper VulcanGo Lower VulcanGo Mt GoodwynTi JamiesonTi Echuca ShoalsTi Upper Vulcan
µ0.025 m(250Å)
152
Figure 4.4. Interpretation of SANS data for Brewster-1A, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
50000 200 400 600 800
DEPT
H (m
Bel
ow S
ea L
evel
) ONSET 1
ONSET 2
ONSET 3
BARRIER
BARRIER
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1 (cm -1)
Brewster-1 (depth BSL)Dinichthys-1 (depth BSL)Gorgonichthys-1 (depth BSL)Titanichthys -1 (depth BSL)
µ0.025 m(250Å)
4.4 SANS Results: Adele-1 and Crux-1 compared to Brewster-1A
Brewster-1A and Adele-1, both located in the Caswell Sub-basin, are geographically close and geologically similar. Crux-1, which has been drilled in the northern part of the Heywood Graben for a Triassic Nome Formation, is located over the Jurassic rift graben overlaid by a proximal portion of the Cretaceous prograde, and has the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals sections much thinner and the Jurassic section much thicker than the other two wells (Figures 1.2 (well location), 3.5 (Brewster-1A), 3.23 (Adele-1) and 3.38 (Crux-1)). Despite these significant differences, the depth of burial of the upper part of
153
the Jamieson Formation is similar for all three wells, which enables some meaningful comparison between the corresponding sets of SANS data.
Figure 4.5 illustrates the variation of scattering intensity with depth normalised to the sea level datum and measured for the three wells at Q=0.01Å -1. For the Brewster-1A and Adele-1 wells, the general character of the intensity versus depth curve is similar: low intensity near the top of the Jamieson Formation, a rapid increase towards a maximum value in mid-Jamieson Formation, followed by another rapid increase - sharp decrease cycle ending at the bottom of the Jamieson Formation. For the Crux-1 well there is a minimum scattering intensity in mid-Jamieson Formation, clearly visible despite the relatively low sampling density.
In Section 3 of this report it is demonstrated that for each individual well the pore number density for pore sizes of about 250 Å does not vary significantly with depth except for the narrow region at the base of the Jamieson Formation (61 m to 84 m thick “K Aptian sandstone member” or “K Aptian sandstone member equivalent”). Bitumen has the scattering length density much larger than brine or gas, and being rather similar to that of the rock matrix, which results in the loss of scattering contrast. Therefore, low values of scattering intensity are interpreted as being caused by the presence of generated bitumen in the pore space. Based on this interpretation, depths of the onset of mobile hydrocarbon generation and expulsion to larger pores (referred to as “onset” below) predicted by SANS coincide with the minimum values of the scattering intensity.
The first onset identified by SANS is located at the top of Jamieson Formation at the depth of 2700 m for Brewster-1 and 2650 m for Adele-1. In this depth region the vitrinite reflectance values are 0.54% for Brewster-1A (Keiraville data) and 0.52% for Adele-1. The first onset for Crux-1 is located in the mid-Jamieson Formation at the depth of 2400 m and the corresponding vitrinite reflectance value is 0.51%.
The second onset identified in Brewster-1A and Adele-1 is located in the mid-Jamieson Formation at depth of 3050 m and 3200 m, respectively. In this depth region the vitrinite reflectance values are 0.54% for Brewster-1A (Keiraville data) and 0.62% for Adele-1. The second onset for Crux-1 can be identified at the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation at the depth of about 2690 m, with the corresponding vitrinite reflectance value of 0.42% (directly measured, probably suppressed) or 0.80% (from FAMM).
A third onset of hydrocarbon generation has been identified for Crux-1 near the base of the Upper Vulcan Formation (Figure 3.54), with corresponding vitrinite reflectance value of 0.45% (measured directly) or 0.90% (from FAMM). This Formation was not sampled for SANS work neither within Brewster-1A nor Adele-1.
The existence of two Cretaceous SANS-identified onsets of mobile hydrocarbon generation and expulsion to larger pores is interpreted to be due to the markedly different kinetics for thermal maturation of organic matter deposited in each of the two hydrocarbon generation units (source rocks).
The overall magnitude of the scattering intensity versus depth is similar for Brewster-1A and Adele-1, and by a factor of two smaller for Crux-1 (Figure 4.5), whereas the experimental error for the absolute intensity does not exceed 10% absolute and is much less in relative terms.
154
Figure 4.5. Scattering intensity versus depth (below sea level) for stratigraphic formations in Brewster-1A, Crux-1 and Adele-1.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Figure 4.5Comparison of SANS data for three wells
SANS intensity vs depth at Q=0.01Å-1, pore size 250Å+/-50%Br - Brewster-1A, Crux - Crux-1, Adele - Adele-1
Br Jamieson
Br Echuca Shoals
Br Upper Vulcan
Crux Jamieson
Crux Echuca Shoals
Crux Upper Vulcan
Crux Lower Vulcan
Adele Jamieson
SCATTERING INTENSITY AT Q=0.01Å-1 (cm-1)
DE
PT
H (
m b
elow
sea
leve
l)
calcareous?
onset 1 Br
onset 2 Br
4.5 Source Rock Summary
Rock-Eval/TOC source rock data was obtained from the Jamieson Formation from the wells Brewster-1A, Carbine-1, Adele-1, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1, as is summarised in Figure 4.6. Overall the Jamieson Formation has poor source richness. Although the TOC contents range from 0.6%-2% with average values of 1.3% their potential yields are low (range S1+S2 = 0.4-2.7 mg hydrocarbons/g rock; average S1+S2 = 1.4 mg hydrocarbons/g rock), as summarised from Brewster-
155
1A and Carbine-1 (the other wells had the S1 peak removed). This formation contains Type II/III to Type III kerogen that is immature-marginally mature for hydrocarbon generation (average Tmax = 431oC). However, those samples with HI values between 150-259 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC typically have TOC contents less than 1.8%.
Therefore, based on the pyrolysis results, where sampled the Jamieson Formation is not expected to have generated liquid hydrocarbons. This conclusion is confirmed by SANS/USANS evidence. Although SANS has detected the presence of bitumen in small pores (about 0.01 µm diameter) within two or three different depth intervals within the Jamieson Formation in Adele-1, Crux-1, Gorgonichthys-1, Titanichthys-1, Dinichthys-1 and Brewster-1A, USANS data acquired for the two latter wells clearly indicate that the amount of generated bitumen has been insufficient to saturate the pore space and create an effective source rock. SANS data for Brecknock South-1 and Carbine-1 are inconclusive, as they are masked by the varying source rock lithology and strong compaction signal, respectively.
Rock-Eval/TOC source rock data were obtained for the Echuca Shoals Formation from the wells Brewster-1A, Carbine-1, Crux-1, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. Overall the Echuca Shoals Formation has poor source richness. Although the TOC contents range from 0.6%-2.8% with average values of 1.8% their potential yields are low (range S1+S2 = 0.9-4.8 mg hydrocarbons/g rock; average S1+S2 = 2.4 mg hydrocarbons/g rock), as observed in Brewster-1A and Carbine-1 (the other wells had the S1 peak removed). This formation contains Type II/III to Type III kerogen that is early mature for hydrocarbon generation (average Tmax = 441oC). The samples with HI values between 150-264 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC typically have TOC contents between 1% and 2.8%.
Therefore, based on the pyrolysis results, some liquid hydrocarbons could have been generated within the Echuca Shoals Formation. SANS has detected the presence of bitumen in small pores (about 0.01 µm diameter) within the Echuca Shoals Formation in Adele-1, Crux-1, Gorgonichthys-1, Titanichthys-1, Dinichthys-1 and Brewster-1A. SANS data for Brecknock South-1 and Carbine-1 are inconclusive, as they are masked by the varying source rock lithology and strong compaction signal, respectively. USANS data, which are crucial for detecting the presence of bitumen in largest pores and, therefore, determine whether hydrocarbon expulsion could occur, have only been acquired for two wells: Dinichthys-1 and Brewster-1A.
Combined SANS/USANS data for Dinichthys-1 show the presence of generated bitumen in pores of all sizes near the base of the Echuca Shoals Formation, but not at the depths adjacent to the Berriasian 'Brewster' Sandstone, which is an important reservoir rock. That is, hydrocarbons generated in the Echuca Shoals Formation do not appear to have been expelled into the Berriasian Sandstone reservoir. This is consistent with previous findings based on oil-source correlation that the Berriasian Sandstone reservoirs have not been charged from Early Cretaceous source rocks. In Brewster-1A there is SANS/USANS evidence of pore-size-specific oil-to-gas cracking within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
Based on pyrolysis data, the most oil-prone source rocks are apparently found in Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1, however there is the possibility that these samples may still contain residual contaminants from the drilling mud.
156
The only source rock data available for the Upper and Lower Vulcan formations and the Montara Formation are from Crux-1, therefore no comparisons could be made to other wells.
Figure 4.6 Comparison of source rock data from Browse Basin study wells.
380 400 420 440 460 480 5000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
VR = 1.35%
III
I
II
VR = 0.5%
Oil
Oil + Gas
Gas + Oil
Gas
VR = 0.8%
imm
atu
re
earl
y m
atu
re
matu
re
ove
r m
ature
Hydro
gen I
ndex (
mg H
C/g
TO
C)
pre
sent
day
Tmax ( C)
Jamieson Formation
Browse Basin Source Rocks
Echuca Shoals Formation
Upper Vulcan Formation
Lower Vulcan Formation
14/OA/1811
157
5 Conclusions
Modern drilling practices typically involve the addition of organic compounds to water-based muds, such as glycol, or the use of SBMs. Not all WCRs list the total additives used while drilling the well, as highlighted by the wells Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. Organic additives present in the sediment samples have a significant effect on TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results; notably low and variable Tmax values, high S1, S2, TOC, HI and BI values. Such results can lead to an underestimation of thermal maturity and an overestimation of hydrocarbon source potential.
Extraction of samples obtained from mud systems using glycol additives or SMBs with organic solvents removes any organic compounds present to varying degrees. The amount of contamination remaining in the sample depends on the initial concentration of the contaminant, the porosity and permeability of the rock sample and the rigorousness of the extraction process. This means that the validity of the TOC and pyrolysis data is still questionable even after solvent extraction.
A full set of data is routinely reported in WCRs for samples that have been extracted with solvents. However, the S1 abundances of the extracted samples are invalid because any naturally occurring free hydrocarbons (as well as contaminants) are removed during the extraction process. Therefore, the S1 and the derivatives, BI and PI cannot be used for source rock evaluation. Since the kerogen in the rock is unaffected by the solvent extraction process, the S2 and derivatives Tmax and HI values should reflect the maturity and source quality of the sediment. In reality, Tmax trends seem to be fairly reliable regardless of the drilling fluid used. However, widely varying TOC, S2 and HI values were obtained from the extracted samples due to contaminants remaining in the sample. Generally, SWC samples were less affected by contaminants than cuttings samples, as shown by the results from Adele-1.
In summary, reliable TOC and pyrolysis data were obtained for Brewster-1A and Carbine-1 which were used in the evaluation of the source potential of the Lower Cretaceous Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations. Data that were used with caution were obtained from Adele-1, Crux-1, Dinichthys-1, Gorgonichthys-1 and Titanichthys-1. No useable data were obtained from Argus-1 and the data from Brecknock South-1 were not used in the source rock evaluations due to the lower than expected Tmax values.
The Lower Cretaceous Jamieson Formation and Echuca Shoals Formation have similar TOC contents with averages of 1.3% and 1.8%, respectively. Evaluation of their source richness could only be made from the wells Brewster-1A and Carbine-1, since all other samples in the study were extracted, removing the S1 peak. The data from these wells showed that the sediments had poor generative potential with average S1+S2 values less than 3 mg hydrocarbons/g rock. They contain Type II/III to Type III kerogen. The samples from the Jamieson Formation with HI values between 150-259 mg hydrocarbons/g TOC typically have TOC contents less than 1.8%. This, coupled with their lack of thermal maturity implies that this formation has not generated and expelled hydrocarbons. The samples from the Echuca Shoals Formation with the highest source rock quality have sufficient maturity to have generated and expelled some liquid hydrocarbons.
158
In contrast to Rock-Eval/TOC, drilling mud contamination does not seem to affect SANS/USANS data. Similarly, natural weathering of cuttings stored in sealed plastic bags seems to have little effect (Brewster-1A was drilled in 1980). SANS/USANS results, however, can be strongly affected by microstructural variations caused either by varying sample lithology (Brecknock South-1) or strong compaction caused by shallow burial (Carbine-1). SANS interpretation is also inconclusive for overmature source rocks (Argus-1). For the remaining six wells there is SANS evidence of bitumen generation in the small pores both within the Jamieson Formation and the Echuca Shoals Formation. Depending on the well, there are two or three distinct generative depth intervals within the Jamieson Formation, separated by permeability barriers.
USANS data for Brewster-1A and Dinichthys-1 indicate that there is insufficient bitumen saturation of larger pores in the Jamieson Formation to create an effective source rock. Within the Echuca Shoals Formation, for Dinichthys-1 there is USANS evidence of bitumen presence in pores of all sizes, but not at depths adjacent to the Berriasian ‘Brewster’ Sandstone. There is also USANS evidence of oil-to-gas cracking for Brewster-1A within the Echuca Shoals Formation.
159
6 Recommendations and Further Work
1. Modify Extraction Method. Since the glycol contaminant contains a high proportion of alkenes, and the Rock-Eval pyrolysis results appear to be still effected by the contaminant, the washing process should be modified to include an additional wash with petroleum ether to remove the alkenes. However, this residual contamination may reside in smaller, water-wet pores. If this is the case, the petroleum ether will not be able to penetrate the sediments. An alternative extraction method would be to use the Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE), as this uses higher temperatures and generally facilitates a higher extraction yield. After extracting the samples by these two methods, use USANS to examine the efficiency of the extraction process in the larger pores.
2. Effect of glycol on S3 peak. Determine whether glycol decomposes at < 390oC to liberate CO2, and hence determine if the S3 peak is affected despite the Oxygen Index being low in both contaminated and uncontaminated samples.
3. Oil-source rock correlations. Prior to any oil-source rock correlations being run, the composition of the drilling fluid contaminants should be determined and an assessment made of the extent that these contaminants will interfere with biomarker and isotopic measurements which are used as the primary source characterisation parameters. The aromatic components of the drilling fluid need to be assessed to determine their influence on maturity parameters. Geotechnical Services have produced a commercial report “Drilling fluids and mud additives: their impact on the interpretation of geochemical data”, which documents the chemical compositions of typical fluids used to drill Australian wells. This report will assist in the identification of contaminant compounds. If oil-source rock correlations are carried out on the Jamieson and Echuca Shoals formations, the best samples would be from the wells around the Brewster Field. The Upper and Lower Vulcan Formation could be sampled from Crux-1. However, the effect of the drilling contaminants on the geochemical parameters must first be ascertained.
4. Kinetic Analysis. Carry out kinetic analysis to define the thermal maturity required to generate hydrocarbons from the Jamieson Formation compared with kerogen from the Echuca Shoals Formation.
5. Importance of combined SANS/USANS studies. The abundance, quality and maturity of the kerogen in the source rocks interpreted from conventional Rock-Eval pyrolysis data needs to be compared with the SANS/USANS results to verify which source rocks have generated and expelled liquid hydrocarbons. This study demonstrates that most conclusive results can be obtained when both SANS (generation) and USANS (saturation and expulsion) data are available.
160
161
7 References
Blevin, J.E., Struckmeyer, H.I.M., Cathro, D.L., Totterdell, J.M., Boreham, C.J., Romine, K.K., Loutit, T.S. and Sayers, J. (1998a). Tectonostratigraphic framework and petroleum systems of the Browse Basin, North West Shelf. In: Purcell, P.G. and R.R. (eds) The Sedimentary Basins of Western Australia 2. Proceedings of Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium, Perth, WA, 369-396.
Blevin, J.E., Boreham, C.J., Summons, R.E., Struckmeyer, H.I.M. and Loutit, T.S. (1998b). An effective Early Cretaceous petroleum system on the North West Shelf: evidence from the Browse Basin. In: Purcell, P.G. and R.R. (eds) The Sedimentary Basins of Western Australia 2. Proceedings of Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium, Perth, WA, 397-420.
Clementz, D.M. (1979). Effect of oil and bitumen saturation on source-rock pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin 63, 2227-2232.
Espitalié, J. and Bordenave, M.L. (1993). Rock Eval pyrolysis. In: Bordenave, M.L. (ed) Applied PetroleumGeochemistry. Éditions Technip, Paris, 237-261.
Espitalié, J., Madec, M. and Tissot, B. (1980). Role of mineral matrix in kerogen pyrolysis: influence on petroleum generation and migration. AAPG Bulletin 64, 59-66.
Espitalié, J., Deroo, G. and Marquis, F. (1985). Rock-Eval pyrolysis and its applications. Rev. Inst. Franç, Pétr., Ref. 32961, vol. 2.
Hainbuchner M., Villa M., Kroupa G., Bruckner G., Baron M., Amenitsch H., Seidl E. and Rauch H. (2000) The new high resolution ultra small-angle neutron scattering instrument at the High Flux Reactor in Grenoble. J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 851-854.
Horsfield, B and Douglas, A.G. (1980). The influence of minerals on the pyrolysis of kerogens. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 1119-1131.
Horsfield, B. (1984). Pyrolysis studies and petroleum exploration. In: Brooks, J. and Welte, D.H. (eds) Advances in Petroleum Geochemistry, Academic, London, vol. 1, pp. 247-298.
Orr, W. L. (1983). Comments on pyrolytic yield in source rock evaluation. In: Bjorøy, M. et al. (eds) Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1981, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 775-787.
Peters, K.E. (1986). Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin 70, 318-329.
Radlinski, A.P., Kennard J.M., Edwards D.S., Hinde A.L. and Davenport, R. (2004). Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from Early Cretaceous source rocks in the Browse Basin, North West Shelf, Australia: a small angle neutron scattering study. APPEA Journal 2004, 151-180.
Radlinski, A.P. (2006). Small angle neutron scattering and the microstructure of rocks. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. (in press)
Robertson Research Australia Pty. Ltd. (1986). Northwest Shelf, Australia – Phase II. Petroleum Geology and Geochemistry. Volume 3: Well Summary Reports.
162
Thiyagarayan, P., Urban, V., Littrell, K., Ku, C., Wozniak, D.G., Belch, H., Vitt, R., Toeller, J., Leach, D., Haumann, J.R., Ostrowski, G.E., Donley, L.I., Hammonds, J., Carpenter, J.M., and Crawford, R.K. (1998). The performance of the small-angle diffractometer SAND at IPNS. ICANS-XIV, 14th Meeting of the International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources, June 14-19 1998, Starved Rock Lodge, Utica, Illinois.
Well Completion Reports
Brewster-1A WA-35-P Well Completion Report (1980). Woodside Offshore Petroleum Pty. Ltd.
Well Completion Report Adele-1 WA-35-P (1February 1999). Shell Development (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Argus-1, AC/P30 Well Completion Report (February 2001). Prepared by C. Ellis, BHP Petroleum Pty. Ltd.
Brecknock South-1 Well Completion Report (March 2001). Woodside Australian Energy.
Carbine-1, Well Completion Report WA-283-P, Browse Basin, Western Australia (April 2002). Santos Ltd.
Crux-1 Final Geological Report Volume 1, AC/P23 Territory of Ashmore and Cartier (March 2001). Nippon Oil Exploration (Vulcan) Pty. Ltd.
Well Completion Report Dinichthys-1 (WA-285-P, Browse Basin) (May 2001a). Inpex Browse Ltd.
Well Completion Report Gorgonichthys-1 (WA-85-P, Browse Basin) (May 2001b). Inpex Browse Ltd.
Well Completion Report Titanichthys-1 (WA-85-P, Browse Basin), (May 2001c). Inpex Browse Ltd.
163
APPENDICES
164
165
Appendix 1: List of Wells, Samples and Depository Sequences
Table A1.1 List of wells studied in this project.
Well name, water depth, company,
spud dateHydrocarbon type
Drilling mud type
SANS sample depth range (mRT), Formation names
Adele 1 (243m)
Shell, 7/98 gas + oil shows
water-based:KCl/PHPA/
glycol
2530m - 3405m (Jamieson Formation equivalent)
Argus 1 (572m)
BHP Petroleum, 8/2000
gas discovery (non-commercial)
water-based:KCl/PHPA/
glycol
4270m - 4535m (Jamieson & top Vulcan)
Brecknock South 1(423.7m)
Woodside, 8/2000gas/condensate
discovery
water-based:glycol
3530m - 3995m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Vulcan, Plover)
Brewster 1A (256m)
Woodside, 5/1980gas discovery
water-based:brine polymer
2450m - 4230m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Upper Vulcan)
Carbine 1 (54.4m)
Santos, 11/2001dry?
water-based:KCl/PHPA
1349m -1559m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals)
Crux 1 (168m)
Nippon Oil, 4/2000gas discovery
water-based:KCl/PHPA/
glycol/Alplex
2390m - 3550m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Upper Vulcan, Lower Vulcan)
Dinichthys 1(263.6m)
Inpex Browse, 3/2000gas/condensate
discovery
seawater/gel/KCl to 4100m; Aquadrill below
4100m
2550m - 4345m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Upper Vulcan, Lower Vulcan)
Gorgonichthys 1(260m)
Inpex Browse, 5/2000 gas/condensate discovery
seawater/gel/KCl to 3950m; Syntech (SBM) below 3950m
2520m - 4765m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Upper Vulcan, Lower Vulcan, Mt.Goodwyn)
Titanichthys 1 (247m)Inpex Browse, 9/2000 gas/condensate
discovery
seawater/gel/KCl to 3900m; Syntech (SBM) below 3900m
2450m - 3950m(Jamieson, Echuca Shoals,
Upper Vulcan)
166
Table A1.2 Samples analysed in this study from Adele-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mDF) (mDF)
20020066 2580 2585 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020068 2680 2685 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020069 2730 2735 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020070 2780 2785 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020071 2830 2835 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020072 2880 2885 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020073 2930 2935 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020074 2980 2985 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020075 3030 3035 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020076 3080 3085 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020077 3130 3135 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020078 3180 3185 CUTT Upper Heywood 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020079 3220 3225 CUTT Upper Heywood 12B Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020080 3280 3285 CUTT Upper Heywood 12B Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020081 3320 3325 CUTT Upper Heywood 12A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020082 3380 3385 CUTT Upper Heywood 12A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020083 3405 3410 CUTT Upper Heywood 12A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
Table A1.3 Samples analysed in this study from Argus-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)
20020101 4270 4275 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020102 4310 4315 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020103 4350 4355 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020104 4390 4395 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020105 4430 4435 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020106 4475 4480 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020107 4510 4515 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
20020108 4535 4540 CUTT Jamieson 8/9 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol
167
Table A1.4 Samples analysed in this study from Brecknock South-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)20020091 3530 3535 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl M glycol
20020092 3565 3570 CUTT Jamieson 12 Cl glycol
20020093 3585 3590 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl glycol
20020094 3635 3640 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl glycol
20020095 3675 3680 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl glycol
20020096 3705 3710 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl glycol
20020097 3750 3755 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl glycol
20020098 3770 3775 CUTT Vulcan 10 Cl glycol
20020099 3800 3805 CUTT Vulcan 8A Cl glycol
20020100 3995 4000 CUTT Plover 5A Cl F glycol
Table A1.5 Samples analysed in this study from Brewster-1A
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
Formation(Equiv GA)
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)20010654 2450 2455 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010655 2500 2505 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010656 2600 2605 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010657 2700 2705 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010658 2750 2755 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010659 2800 2805 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010660 2850 2855 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010661 2900 2905 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Brine polymer
20010662 2950 2955 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Brine polymer
20010663 3000 3005 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Brine polymer
20010664 3050 3055 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Brine polymer
20010665 3100 3105 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Brine polymer
20010666 3150 3155 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Brine polymer
20010667 3200 3205 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Brine polymer
20010669 3390 3395 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Brine polymer
20010670 3500 3505 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Brine polymer
20010671 3600 3605 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Brine polymer
20010672 3695 3700 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl Brine polymer
20010673 3800 3805 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl Brine polymer
20010674 3850 3855 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl Brine polymer
20010675 4230 4235 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8C Cl Brine polymer
168
Table A1.6 Samples analysed in this study from Carbine-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)20020084 1349 1352 CUTT Jamieson nd Cl KCl/PHPA
20020085 1388 1391 CUTT Jamieson nd SltCl KCl/PHPA
20020086 1439 1442 CUTT Jamieson nd Cl KCl/PHPA
20020087 1478 1481 CUTT Jamieson nd Cl KCl/PHPA
20020088 1499 1502 CUTT Jamieson/ Echuca Shoals
nd SltCl KCl/PHPA
20020089 1517 1520 CUTT Echuca Shoals nd Cl KCl/PHPA
20020090 1559 1561 CUTT Echuca Shoals nd Cl KCl/PHPA
Table A1.7 Samples analysed in this study from Crux-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)
20020109 2390 2400 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020110 2450 2460 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Alplex20020111 2500 2510 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020112 2550 2560 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Alplex20020113 2570 2580 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020114 2600 2610 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Alplex20020115 2650 2660 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020116 2690 2700 CUTT Upper Vulcan 9 SltCl Alplex20020117 2775 2780 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8C SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020118 2805 2810 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8C SltCl Alplex20020119 2850 2855 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8C SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020120 2900 2905 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl Alplex20020121 2945 2950 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020122 2990 2995 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl Alplex20020123 3055 3060 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020124 3110 3115 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl Alplex20020125 3150 3155 CUTT Upper Vulcan 8B SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020126 3200 3205 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A SltCl Alplex20020127 3270 3275 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020128 3325 3330 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A SltCl Alplex20020129 3359 3362 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020130 3400 3405 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A Cl Alplex20020131 3460 3465 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020132 3500 3505 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A Cl Alplex20020133 3550 3555 CUTT Montara 8A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/
Alplexswc:20020134 2599.6 2599.6 SWC Echuca Shoals 11 Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020135 2691.5 2691.5 SWC Upper Vulcan 9 SltCl Alplex20020136 3155.5 3155.5 SWC Lower Vulcan 8B SltCl KCl/PHPA/glycol/20020137 3266.6 3266.6 SWC Lower Vulcan 8A SltCl Alplex20020138 3471.1 3471.1 SWC Lower Vulcan 8A Cl KCl/PHPA/glycol/
Alplex
169
Appendix 1: Table A1.8 Samples analysed in this study from Dinichthys-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
Sequence Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT) GA
20010723 2550 2555 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010724 2610 2620 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010725 2650 2655 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010726 2700 2710 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010727 2740 2750 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010728 2790 2800 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010729 2850 2855 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010730 2895 2900 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010731 2950 2955 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010732 3000 3005 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010733 3045 3050 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010734 3095 3100 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010735 3150 3155 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010736 3250 3255 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010737 3350 3355 CUTT Jamieson 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010738 3450 3455 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010739 3550 3555 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010740 3640 3650 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Slt Seawater/gel/KCl
20010741 3760 3765 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 SltCl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010742 3850 3855 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 SltCl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010743 3950 3955 CUTT Echuca Shoals 9 SltCl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010744 4040 4045 CUTT Upper Vulcan 9 SltCl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010745 4190 4195 CUTT Upper Vulcan 9 Cl Aquadrill
20010746 4285 4290 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8C Cl+some Slt
Aquadrill
20010747 4345 4350 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8C Cl+some Slt
Aquadrill/Pyrodrill
170
Appendix 1: Table A1.9 Samples analysed in this study from Gorgonichthys-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
Sequence GA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)
20010676 2520 2525 CUTT Woolaston 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010677 2620 2625 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010678 2720 2725 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010679 2780 2785 CUTT Jamieson 12C Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010680 2820 2825 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010681 2870 2875 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010682 2920 2925 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010683 2970 2975 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010684 3020 3025 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010685 3070 3075 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010686 3120 3125 CUTT Jamieson 12B Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010687 3170 3175 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010688 3220 3225 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010689 3265 3270 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010690 3320 3325 CUTT Jamieson 12A Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010691 3370 3375 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010692 3420 3425 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010693 3520 3525 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010694 3620 3625 CUTT Echuca Shoals 11 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010695 3720 3725 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010696 3820 3825 CUTT Echuca Shoals 10 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010697 3905 3910 CUTT Echuca Shoals 9 Cl Seawater/gel/KCl
20010698 4120 4125 CUTT Upper Vulcan 9 Cl+Slt Syntech (SBM)
20010699 4220 4225 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8B Cl+SltCl Syntech (SBM)
20010700 4320 4325 CUTT Lower Vulcan 8A Cl+SltCl Syntech (SBM)
20010701 4720 4725 CUTT Mt Goodwin 4 Cl Syntech (SBM)
20010702 4765 4770 CUTT Mt Goodwin 4 Cl Syntech (SBM)
171
Table A1.10 Samples analysed in this study from Titanichthys-1
AGSO No Upper Depth
Lower Depth
Sample Type
FormationWCR
SequenceGA
Lithology Drilling Fluid
(mRT) (mRT)20010703 2450 2455 CUTT Jamieson Cl 13 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010704 2550 2555 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010705 2650 2655 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010706 2750 2755 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010707 2800 2805 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010708 2850 2855 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010709 2900 2905 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12C Seawater/gel/KCl
20010710 2950 2955 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12B Seawater/gel/KCl
20010711 3000 3005 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12B Seawater/gel/KCl
20010712 3050 3055 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12A Seawater/gel/KCl
20010713 3100 3105 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12A Seawater/gel/KCl
20010714 3145 3150 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12A Seawater/gel/KCl
20010715 3250 3255 CUTT Jamieson Cl 12A Seawater/gel/KCl
20010716 3350 3355 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 11 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010717 3450 3455 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 11 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010718 3550 3555 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 11 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010719 3650 3655 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 10 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010720 3745 3750 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 10 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010721 3850 3855 CUTT Echuca Shoals Cl 10 Seawater/gel/KCl
20010722 3950 3955 CUTT Upper Vulcan SltCl 9 Syntech (SBM)
Sample type: Cutt - cuttingsswc - side-wall-core
Lithology key:Cl - claystone Cl F - fluvial claystone Cl M - marine claystoneSlt - siltstoneSltCl - silty claystone
Water-based drilling muds and additive: Alplex Aquadrill - complex polymerFlowzan - xanthan gum biopolymerKCl - potassium chlorideGuar gum - spud mud viscosifierPHPA - partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamidesGlycol Pyrodrill
Synthetic and oil-based muds:SyntechSynthetic-based mud
172
Table A1.11. Depository sequences for nine wells in the Browse Basin. Part 1 - Geoscience Australia classification of depository sequences. Part 2 - depository sequences as in Well Completion Reports. All depths are in mRT.
Sequence Top (Geoscience Australia classification)
Adele-1 Brecknock South-1
Brewster-1A
Crux -1
Gorgonichthys-1
Tertiary 287 450 264 194.5 286.8
Maastrichtian 1680 3350 1627 1509 1818
Campanian 1990 3376 1820 1824 1991
Santonian -Turonian
2372 3440 2020 1960 2267
Jamieson Fm (Turonian - Aptian)
2527 3525 2350 2388 2481
Echuca Shoals Fm (Aptian - Valanginian)
3445 3575 3345 2591 3365
Upper Vulcan Fm (Valanginian - Tithonian)
4055 3776 3868 2690 3880
Lower Vulcan Fm (Tithonian - Callovian)
4337 3782 4335 2900 4218
Plover Fm (below Callovian)
4362 3810 4465 3593 4467
Sequence Top (after WCR)
Argus Sequence Top (after WCR)
Carbine 1 Sequence Top (after WCR)
Din-ichthys
Titan-ichthys 1
Tertiary 594 Tertiary 107 Tertiary 290 273.4
Bathurst Island Group
4021 Prudhoe Deltaics Member (MidMaastrichtian)
922 Puffin Fm(Maastrichtian-Campanian)
1847 1662
Intra-Campanian
4218 Borde Marl(Late Campanian-Early Maastrichian)
1135 Fenelon Fm (Santonian-Turonian)
2262 2055
Jamieson Fm 4242 Puffin Sandstone(Early Campanian)
1263 Woolaston Fm(Cenomanian)
2484 2326
EchucaShoals Fm
absent Fenelon Fm (Santonian-Turonian)
1340 Jamieson Fm(Cenomanian- Albian)
2516 2402
Vulcan Fm 4535 Jamieson Fm(Cenomanian)
1343 Echuca Shoals Fm (Barremian-Valanginian)
3424 3305
Plover Fm not confrmd
Echuca Shoals Fm(Aptian - Cenomanian)
1500 Upper VulcanFm (Berrasian)
4008 3888
undifferentiatedvolcanics
4700 Lower VulcanFm (Tithonian-Oxfordian)
4204 4274
Plover Fm(Callovian -Bajocian)
4418.5 4528
173
Appendix 2: Analytical Procedures
A2.1 Comparison of the Small Angle Scattering and Geochemical Methods
Table A2.1 Comparison of the SAS and geochemical methods.
Diagnostic function Small Angle Scattering Geochemistry
General
Microstructure of rock matrix (inorganic or organic):
pore size distribution (1 nm to 20 µm across)
specific internal surface area pore content non-invasive, cores and/or cuttings absolutely calibrated
Composition of organic matter: amount of OM kinetics of thermal
decomposition molecular composition
(including biomarkers): oil-source correlation
isotopic composition (C, H, O ,S): gas-oil correlation
invasive - crushed rocks, extracts
lab protocol dependent
Hydrocarbon source rock applications
Petroleum fill-spill history: direct evidence organic matter type independent timing of oil generation, oil
expulsion, oil-to-gas cracking presence of hydrocarbons in pores
(mudrocks) organic matrix reorganisation
(coals) pore size specific - follows h/c
migration within the pore network of a source rock
Petroleum fill-spill history: indirect evidence organic matter type dependent timing of oil generation, oil
expulsion, oil-to-gas cracking sum-of-pores information
Hydrocarbon reservoir rock and seal applications
hydrocarbon saturation in reservoir/seal rocks
porosity/permeability in reservoir rocks
seal capacity
hydrocarbon saturation in reservoir /seal rocks
Sensitivity to contamination by drilling muds
Not evident Strong (S1, S2, Tmax)
174
A2.2 SANS/USANS Sample Preparation (extracted from Geoscience Australia Sedimentology Laboratory Operating Procedure)
Authors: Neil Ramsay, Alex McLachlan and Tony Watson
1.0 Introduction
The SANS (Small Angle Neutron Scatter) sample procedures are used in the Sedimentology laboratory to prepare samples for SANS analysis.
2.0 Purpose
The purpose of this SOP is to:
- Communicate the hazards associated with this operation,
- document the control measures that will be used to control the hazards,
- document the protocols, methodology and procedures involved in performing the operation,
- document the precautions and limitations applicable to this operation, and
- define the required qualifications of personnel performing the operation.
3.0 Scope
The scope of this SOP covers all aspects of work undertaken in the Sedimentology Laboratory (Petroleum and Marine Division) at Geoscience Australia’s Canberra facilities relating to the SANS preparation procedures. Equipment used includes a mortar and pestle, compessed air, drying oven, ultrasonic bath, disposable sieving mesh, electronic balance (accurate to four decimal places), a set of aluminium sieve rings (100mm diameter), low viscosity epoxy resin, Buehler Isomet 1000 precision saw and a micometer.
4.0 Responsibilities
This document and procedures are the responsibility of Geoscience Australia.
5.0 Hazards
Hazards concerning this SOP include:
- Excessive noise when using compressed air to dry/clean equipment,
- samples can possibly contain coliforms and/or other harmful micro-organisms,
- fine dust particles when grinding or cleaning equipment,
- Occupational Overuse Syndrome (OOS),
- Epoxy fumes
175
6.0 Hazard Control Measures and Limitations
6.1 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Control Measures
- Laboratory coat must be worn at all times in laboratory,
- ear protection is to be used at all times when noise is excessive,
- cotton gloves are to be worn at all times when in contact with sample for this proceedure,
- face shield or safety glasses are to be worn when using compressed air,
- lab coat, gloves and safety glasses must be worn when using potting epoxy,
- Store and use Epoxy in a well ventilated area.
6.2 Administrative Control Measures
- Operator must have read and be familiar with operating instructions for all equipment and this SOP,
- Geoscience Australia’s OH&S and OOS policies.
7.0 Procedural Steps
Grinding
IMPORTANT NOTE: When performing any procedures or analysis on SANS samples it is imperative that cotton gloves are worn. This is to avoid organic contamination of samples.
1. Enter all samples and attached information into pallab database and print off a running spread sheet to work off in the lab.
2. Weigh all of the samples as a bulk weight and record on running spread sheet.
3. Set out the samples on sufficient bench space according to their pallab numbers.
4. For every sample allocate three (3) 20ml vials. These will be labelled coarse fraction, SANS fraction, and fine fraction as well as their respective lab numbers etc. If sub samples are required for geochemistry and palynology then an addition two (2) labelled vials will be needed for these.
5. Use 100mm diameter aluminium sieve rings with base and lid to sieve material, no crushing of sample in the first instance. Place 475um disposable sieve mesh on top ring and 355um disposable mesh on bottom ring (see diagram 1.0) place sample on top mesh attach lid and shake gently.
176
Diagram 1.0 – set up of sieving apparatus
6. Remove the top dividing ring and pour the coarse fraction of the sample into the mortar.
7. Carefully grind the coarse fraction so that more of it will pass through the sieve cloth. This needs to be done very gently and slowly if there is a limited amount of sample available. Return the coarse sample back to the sieve mesh and repeat the shaking of the sieve.
8. Repeat this process until there is between 1.5 & 2gms of the SANS fraction, do not process whole sample once target SANS yield (<475um >355um) is met.
9. Dismantle the sieving apparatus and transfer the SANS fraction to a piece of weighing paper. Ensure that this is done over clean white paper to catch any falling pieces of sample.
Note: dismantle sieves slowly and carefully, keeping hold of the sieve cloth as the ring and cloth may pop out unexpectedly.
10. Weigh SANS fraction then transfer to a glass vial. Record this final weight in the running spreadsheet.
11. Repeat this weighing process for the remaining coarse and fine fractions making sure that the weighing paper is clean between each. In some instances to reach target yield the coarse fraction may be entirely processed. Discard the used sieve cloths and weighing paper.
12. Clean the bench space to prevent contamination. Clean the mortar and pestle, and the sieve sets thoroughly. They can be scrubbed under hot water and placed in an ultrasonic bath to remove any contamination left from the previous sample.
13. After the equipment has been cleaned dry it with compressed air to remove most of the water.
177
14. The equipment can then be placed in a warm oven, about 50°C, until it is totally dry and ready to reuse.
15. Repeat this process for any remaining samples.
Encapsulation and sectioning of sample
1. Using the SANS fraction place the material into tailor made acrylic mounting pots (20mm internal diameter, 8mm internal height) 3.5mm-4.0mm depth of sample is required this equates to 1.5-2.0gms of sample (note: differing materials may require assessment for optimum encapsulation and sectioning results). Do not fill pots with sample as this may prevent epoxy from completely immersing the sample.
2. Prepare the Epoxy Resin for sample encapsulation ( Current product is Buehler EPO-THIN 2 pack low viscosity epoxy resin). When mixed, pour gently into potting mount, check base of mount to ensure sample is saturated, leave 24 hours to cure
3. Once cured place sample into sample holding Jig ( see image 1.0) with base outwards.
Image 1.0 Sample pot at right, holding jig at left.
4. Mount holding jig into Isomet 1000 precision saw unit (see image 2.0), cut off the mounts plastic base then reset the saw to slice a 1.0 - 1.2 mm wafer of sample and if possible (consult with project scientist) a 0.4 – 0.5mm wafer. Use a micrometer to measure thickness of wafer at it’s middle, record this on the clear plastic rim of the wafer along with sample number. Store sample for transport.
178
Image 2.0 Sample mount in holding jig ready for sectioning.
8.0 Flow Chart
Enter samples into database
Weigh each bulk sample and record
Label vials for each sample
Set up sieving apparatus with balance and mortar and pestle
Pour sample into sieve and shake through sieve cloth
Pour coarse fraction into mortar
Grind coarse fraction
Return sample to sieve
Repeat until 1.5- 2g of SANS fraction has been obtained or all sample used
Transfer fractions to respective vials and weigh and record
Discard used sieve cloth and weighing paper
Clean all equipment and bench space
sample encapsulation and sectioning
179
A2.3 Introduction to SANS/USANS and its Applications to Source Rock Generation
(Based on an article by A.P. Radlinski and A.L. Hinde, published in Neutron News vol.13 No.2, 2002, 10-14)
Introduction
The microstructure of the pore space in sedimentary rocks is the most important factor controlling fluid flow properties in geological formations, including the migration and retention of water, oil and gas. It is difficult to give a satisfactory description of the pore space microgeometry based on any direct imaging method because of the very wide distribution of pore sizes and complex, intrinsic 3-D character of the pore space geometry.
The minimum pore size in sedimentary rocks is of the order of 1 nm, whereas the maximum pore size depends on the rock coarseness and varies from several µm for siltstones to several hundred µm for sandstones.
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) is an ideal, non-destructive technique, well suited to study the microstructure of complex porous systems. The scattering occurs at the interface between the rock matrix and the pore space and information pertinent to the size distribution of the pores can be retrieved from the scattering intensity, I(Q). I(Q) is measured versus the scattering vector, Q: Q= (4π/λ) sin (Θ/2), where Θ is the (small) scattering angle and λ is the wavelength of neutrons [1-3]. For scattering objects of roughly spherical geometry (like pores), the dominant contribution to the scattering intensity, measured at a particular value of Q, comes from scattering objects within the linear size range 2.5/Q +/- 50% [4].
Figure 1 illustrates the range of sizes that can be observed with neutron scattering instruments using various types of optics: pinhole [5], time-of-flight [6], double crystal diffraction [7,8] and multiple Laue diffraction [9]. The latter configuration is listed for completeness, as it has not been put into a practical use in a small angle scattering instrument yet. Therefore, currently the range of sizes of scattering objects that can be detected with SANS is from 1 nm to about 30 µm. This range can be extended up to several hundred µm using statistical analysis of microscopic images (SEM, TEM, and optical [10,11]).
Background
A typical sedimentary rock is a complex and somewhat ill-defined “dirty” system. This is epitomised in the word “mudrock” (or mudstone) which may be described as a water-saturated, highly compacted fine mixture of many different oxides of light elements, numerous trace elements, and hundreds of species of fossil organic molecules. The question remains whether any meaningful microstructural information can be extracted from the neutron scattering curve of such a complex system.
The subject of small angle scattering is reviewed in several publications, both general [1-3] and specific to geological applications [12-16]. Since scattering takes place on the interface between two adjacent phases its effectiveness is determined by numerical values of the appropriate scattering length densities (SLD). In petroleum geology the
180
interest is focussed on the generation, migration and storage of formation fluids (brine and hydrocarbons). These processes occur in the pore space and, consequently, the scattering contrast between the pore space (filled with formation fluids or not) and the rock matrix is of central importance.
Figure 2 shows the neutron scattering length densities (SLD) for major organic and inorganic constituents of sedimentary rocks. The SLD of a material depends on its chemical composition and specific density. For various types of organic matter the value of SLD depends mostly on the carbon-to-hydrogen atomic ratio. The solid curve shown in Figure 2 has been calculated for saturated hydrocarbons (CnHn+2). The scatter reflects the departure from this formula for saturates, polars, aromatics, asphaltenes and macerals in whole coals and kerogens. These are the main organic components in sedimentary rocks. The major inorganic components or sedimentary rocks are quartz and corundum with the remaining oxides of light elements typically taking less than 10 wt%.
1
102
104
106
108
1010
10-7 10-5 10-3 10-1 101
Figure 1 Neutron NewsLinear scale range accessible
with SANS techniques
LIN
EA
R R
AN
GE
(Å
)
2 THETA (degrees)
Braggdiffraction
SANS(pinhole, TOF)
USANS(DCD)
LDSANS(multiple Laue
diffraction)
20 Å
3000 Å
30 mµ
= 5 Åλ
arcdegarcminarcsec
1 cm
Figure 1. Range of linear sizes that can be observed with various types of neutron optics.
When one component dominates the rock (eg quartz in sandstone) or various components are intimately mixed (eg siltstones) the inorganic matrix can be characterised by a single value of SLD, averaged over the rock composition. SLDs calculated for the crystalline rock (ash, crystalline) and the actual shale (ash, shale) are different owing to different specific densities of the ideal (crystalline) and the
181
actual (porous and amorphous) rock. Furthermore, it is important to note that SLDs for the organic macerals (ie whole coals) and the inorganic component of the rock (ash) are similar to each other. Consequently, it is possible to interpret SANS data for sedimentary rocks in the two-phase approximation, one phase being the pore space and the other the rock matrix.
SANS can be used to observe migration of fluid phases through the pore space. Migration of liquid hydrocarbons with significant polar, aromatic or asphaltene fractions leads to the loss of contrast and, consequently, decrease of the scattering intensity. The relatively large value of SLD for heavy water enables contrast matching experiments in water-saturated sedimentary rocks [17].
Application to Petroleum Geology
The microstructure of the rock matrix
For sedimentary rocks, a power law scattering curve (I(Q) = const x Qn) is frequently observed. This can be attributed to a polydisperse distribution, f(r), of pore sizes [18]. The pore size distribution, f(r), gives the proportion of pores whose radii lie between r and r + dr. It has been demonstrated that for sedimentary rocks the pores can be reasonably assumed to be roughly spherical. Consequently f(r) can be obtained from I(Q) through a straightforward numerical procedure [19]. Furthermore, the specific surface area, for probe size r, can be calculated from f(r) as the sum of surface areas of all pores of radius larger than r divided by the sample volume.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
SC
ATT
ER
ING
LE
NG
TH D
EN
SIT
Y (
x1010 c
m-2
)
C/H ATOMIC RATIO
ash, crystallinecalculated for
pure hydrocarbons
saturates
asphaltenes
polars and aromatics
wholecoals
quartz, SiO2
corundum, Al 2 O 3
ash, shale
anatase, TiO2
lime, CaO
K2O
periclase, MgO
H2O
void
heavy water, D2O
Figure 2. Neutron scattering length density for major minerals and organic matter types present in sedimentary rocks.
182
Figure 3. The comparison of SANS/USANS scattering data for a typical sandstone [24, 25], shale [20, 24] and coal [19]. Data for sandstone have been truncated at Q = 3x10-4 Å-1 in order to eliminate the data points affected by multiple scattering.
Typical examples of power law scattering are illustrated in Figure 3 for a sandstone, shale and coal. The exponent n usually falls between -3 and -4, indicating the surface fractal character of the pore/rock interface [20]. The fractal properties extend over the range of length scales of over 3 decades (11 decades in intensity), which makes sedimentary rocks one of the most extensive fractal systems found in nature. The ubiquitous fractal microstructure of sedimentary rocks has been explained as a consequence of the antisintering thermodynamic conditions at the grain/grain and grain/formation fluid interface prevalent during the rock formation process [21].
Figure 4 shows the pore size distribution f(r) calculated for a sandstone, shale and coal from SANS data. All three pore size distributions indeed follow a power law and the calculated fractal dimensions are very similar to those obtained directly from the slope of SANS curves plotted on a log-log scale. The range of pore sizes determined by SANS extends over 4 orders of magnitude, from 10 Å to 10 µm. This is similar to the
183
range accessible using the mercury injection porisimetry (MIP), however SANS is non-invasive and can potentially access pore sizes smaller than MIP.
Figure 5 shows the calculated internal specific surface area (SSA) for the three types of rock. For fractal systems the specific surface area depends on the size (diameter) of the measuring probe. SANS enables one to determine SSA down to a probe size of 10 - 25 Å, and the data can be readily extrapolated to probe sizes of several Å. It is interesting to note that in this limit SSAs for the three types of rock are all of the same order of magnitude, the one for the coal being the smallest. This illustrates the point that the high sorption capacity of coals for gases, like methane and carbon dioxide, is driven as much by the physiochemical affinity as the large internal surface area.
Figure 4. The comparison of SANS/USANS-derived pore size distribution for a sandstone [23, 24], shale [23, 24], and coal [19]. All three distributions follow a power law, from which the fractal dimension can be determined.
184
Figure 5. The comparison of SANS/USANS-derived specific surface area for a sandstone [23, 24], shale [23, 24] and coal [19]. Data are extrapolated to the probe size of 4Å, corresponding to the size of methane molecule.
Detection of hydrocarbon generation and migration
Hydrocarbons are generated in mudrocks by thermal maturation - a process of temperature-driven decomposition of organic macromolecules deposited in the pore space of the inorganic rock matrix. The consequent increase in molecular volume leads to the overpressure, formation of micro-cracks and transport of generated hydrocarbons through the network of conduits (interconnected pores) out of source rocks and, if geological conditions are suitable, ultimately into the more porous reservoir rocks, where commercial hydrocarbon accumulations are formed.
Hydrocarbon generation in typical natural conditions occurs over the period of millions of years at subsurface temperatures in the range 90 to 150°C. This process is governed by the Arrhenius-like time/temperature relationship and can be accelerated in laboratory conditions by pyrolising the rock samples at eleveated termperatures. For the duration of pyrolysis of 48 hours the temperature range that spans the oil generation window is 310 to 370°C. Both the geochemical and SANS data indicate the presence of the oil generation threshold at about 320°C [4]. Figure 6 shows the variation of SANS intensity versus the annealing temperature at a Q-value corresponding to the average pore size 300Å +/- 50%. The marked decrease of the scattering intensity between the annealing temperatures 320 and 330°C constitutes the SANS fingerprint of the process of primary migration of generated hydrocarbons through the pore space of the source rock.
185
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
280 300 320 340 360 380
SANS_D11_INT@750ÅScattering cross section vs temp of pyrolysis
immature Urapunga 4, 48h, p=14 bar, N2 atm, closed system, artificial maturity sequence, SANS data
SC
AT
TE
RIN
G IN
TE
NS
ITY
(cm
-1)
ANNEALING TEMPERATURE (°C)
2.5/Q = 300 Å
onset ofprimary
migration
Figure 6 Neutron News
Figure 6. The variation of SANS intensity at a single Q-value versus the annealing temperature for an immature hydrocarbon source rock. Data correspond to the average pore size of 300Å +/- 50%. The marked decrease of the scattering intensity constitutes the SANS fingerprint of the hydrocarbon generation and primary migration (after Reference 4). The rising trend is caused by increased hydrogen depletion as the annealing temperature increases.
Figure 7 schematically illustrates the variation of SANS intensity with depth in field conditions in the region of hydrocarbon generation as monitored for a fixed pore size. As the temperature increases with depth, bitumen generated from kerogen progressively saturates the small pores and then the increasingly larger pores, and expels formation brine. Bitumen has the scattering length density similar to kerogen and similar to the inorganic rock matrix (Figure 2) and, therefore, the scattering contrast is progressively lost with depth and the scattering intensity decreases. The scattering intensity reaches a minimum at the maximum bitumen saturation. At yet greater depth the bitumen is progressively cracked to mobile hydrocarbons which in turn migrate to larger pores as the result of volume expansion. Owing to the corresponding progressive decrease in hydrocarbon density and increase in mobile hydrocarbons with high H/C ratio and low SLD, the scattering contrast increases and the scattering intensity increases.
186
& expulsion of pore waters
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
0 200 400 600 800 1000
DEP
TH (m
)
SCATTERING INTENSITY
Progressive bitumengeneration & saturation
Maximum bitumen saturation& onset of mobile hydrocarbon
generation & expulsion to larger pores
Progressive crackingof bitumen to mobile
hydrocarbons& migration of hydrocarbons
to larger pores
Figure 7. A schematic representation of the SANS intensity (for a selected Q-value) versus depth within the hydrocarbon generation window.
Gas sorption capacity of coal seams
The pore size distribution, f(r), and specific surface area, SSA, are important characteristics of coal as a reservoir rock for gas. In particular, f(r) and SSA for the molecular size probe are major parameters to be determined in order to understand coalbed methane desorption and extraction as well as CO2 sorption for carbon sequestration purposes. Mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption are commonly used to quantify SSA and f(r).
SANS is an excellent tool for non-invasive determination of SSA and f(r) in coals in a single experimental run [18,19]. Figure 8 illustrates the comparison of specific surface area for a probe of diameter 4 Å obtained using the nitrogen adsorption method and SANS. There is an excellent agreement across the entire range of coal ranks, with the
187
SANS values being consistently slightly larger than the N2 adsorption values. This is to be expected as the SANS technique measures all the pores while the nitrogen adsorption method probes only the open pores.
103
104
105
106
0.5 1
Figure 7 Neutron NewsSpecific surface area obtained for coals by SANS
for various probe sizes.Comparison with nitrogen adsorption data.
SP
EC
IFIC
SU
RF
AC
E A
RE
A (
cm2 /c
m3 )
VITRINITE REFLECTANCE Ro (%)
SANS data
N2 adsorption data
Figure 8. The comparison of specific surface area for coals of different rank obtained using SANS and the nitrogen adsorption method. The probe size is 4Å (after Reference 19).
Summary
SANS is a valuable technique to obtain quantitative information about the microstructure of pore space in sedimentary rocks in the scale range 1 nm to 30 µm. SANS can be applied to rocks with any organic matter content, from lean shales to pure coals. Examples of applications include the study of the fractal architecture of the pore space, detection of oil generation in hydrocarbon source rocks, and the assessment of methane and carbon dioxide sorption capacity in coal beds.
References
[1] Guinier, A., G. Fournet, C.B. Walker and K.L. Yudowitch, Small-angle scattering of X-rays, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 259 pp (1955).
[2] Espinat, D., Revue de l’Institut Francais du Petrole, vol. 45 No 6, 1-131 (1990).
[3] Lindner, P. and T. Zemb (Eds), Neutron, X-ray and Light Scattering, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam (1991).
188
[4] Radlinski, A.P., Boreham, C.J., Lindner, P., Randl, O.G., Wignall, G.D. and Hope, J.M., “Small angle neutron scattering signature of oil generation in artificially and naturally matured source rocks”, Org. Geochem. 31, 1-14 (2000).
[5] Russell, T.P., Lin J.S., Spooner, S. and Wignall, G.D., “Intercalibration of small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering data”, J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 629-638 (1988).
[6] Thiyagarayan, P., Epperson, J.E., Crawford, R.K., Carpenter, J.M., Klippert, T.E., and Wozniak D.G., “The time-of-flight small angle neutron diffractometer (SAD) at IPNS, Argonne National Laboratory”, J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 280-283 (1997).
[7] Agamalian, M., Wignall, G.D. and Triolo, R., “Optimization of a Bonse-Hart ultra-small-angle neutron scattering facility by elimination of the rocking curve wings”, J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 345-352 (1997).
[8] Hainbuchner, M., Villa, M., Kroupa, G., bruckner, G., Baron, M., Amenitsch, H., Seidl, E. and Rauch, H., “The new high resolution ultra-small-angle neutron scattering instrument at the High Flux Reactor in Grenoble”, J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 851-854 (2000).
[9] Petrascheck, D. and Rauch, H., Acta Crystallographica, A40, 445-450 (1984).
[10] Thompson, A.H., “Fractals in rock physics”, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, 19, 237-262 (1991).
[11] Bekri, S., et al., Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 25, 107-134 (2000).
[12] Bale, H.D. and P.W. Schmidt, “Small-angle X-ray scattering investigation of submicroscopic porosity with fractal properties”, Phys.Rev. Lett. 53, 596-599 (1984).
[13] Wong, P.-z., Howard, J. and Lin, J.-s., “Surface roughening and the fractal nature of rocks”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 637-640 (1986).
[14] Mildner, D.F.R. and P.L. Hall, “Small-angle scattering from porous solids with fractal geometry”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 19, 1535-1545 (1986).
[15] Radlinski, A.P., Boreham C.J., Wignall, G.D. and Lin, J.S., “Microstructural evolution of source rocks during hydrocarbon generation: A small-angle scattering study”, Phys. Rev. B, 53, 14152-14160 (1996).
[16] Radlinski A.P. and E.Z. Radlinska, in: Coalbed Methane: Scientific, Environmental and Economic Evaluation, M. Mastalerz, M. Glikson, and S. D. Golding (eds), Kluvier Scientific Publishers, Dodrecht, 329-365 (1999).
[17] Broseta, D., Barre, L. and Vizika, O., “Capillary condensation in fractal porous medium”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 5313-5316 (2001).
[18] Schmidt, P.W., “Interpretation of small-angle scattering curves proportional to a negative power of the scattering vector”, J. Appl. Cryst. 15, 567-569 (1982).
189
[19] Radlinski, A.P., Mastalerz, M., Hinde, A.L., Hainbuchner, M., Rauch, H., Baron, M., Lin, J.S., Fan, L. and Thiyagarajan, P., “Application of SAXS and SANS in evaluation of porosity, pore size distribution and surface area of coal”, Int. J. Coal Geology 59, 245-271.
[20] Radlinski, A.P., Radlinska, E.Z., Agamalian, M., Wignall, G.D., Lindner, P. and Randl, OG, “Fractal geometry of rocks”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3078-3081 (1999).
[21] Cohen, M.H., “The morphology of porous sedimentary rocks”. In: Physics and Chemistry of Porous Media - II, J.R. Banavar, J. Koplik and K.W. Winkler (eds), AIP Conference Proceedings No. 154, American Institute of Physics, New York , 3-16 (1987).
[22] Pfeifer, P. and D. Avnir, “Chemistry of noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surface”, Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 3558-3565 (1983).
[23] Radlinski, A.P. and A.L. Hinde, “Applications of SANS and SAXS to Petroleum Geology”, Proceedings of the ESRF/ILL Workshop on Environmental Studies Using Neutron and Synchrotron Facilities, Feb. 20-21, 2001, Grenoble, France.
[24] Hinde, A.L., “PRINSAS – a Windows based computer program for the processing and interpretation of small angle scattering data tailored to the analysis of sedimentary rocks”, J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 1020-1024 (2004).
190
A2.4 TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Sample Preparation
The dry-sieved samples were ground to a fine powder. Several experiments were undertaken to determine the most time effective and thorough way to wash the samples that had been drilled with ‘glycol’ or ‘SBM’. The method used to prepare the samples is as follows:
1. Approximately 200 mg of sample was crushed with a mortar and pestle to a fine powder.
2. The powdered sample was then placed in a centrifuge tube.
3. 15-20 mL of wash solution was added to the centrifuge tube. The wash solution used depended on the drilling fluid used. 90:10 Methanol to dichloromethane was used for glycol contaminated samples, and 50:50 methanol to dichloromethane was used for SBM contaminated samples.
4. The centrifuge tube was placed in the ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes and then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4200 rpm. The supernatant solution was then decanted and, in some cases, retained for further analysis.
5. The sample was repeatedly washed, nine times for glycol contamination and four times for SBM drilling fluid.
6. The sample was oven dried at 40 oC oven and then ground to a lose powder using a mortar and pestle. The homogenized, powdered sample was weighed into an oxidised crucible prior to analysis.
A2.5 TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Method
Instrument: Rock-Eval 6 Turbo supplied by Vinci Technologies – France
Aquistion parameters:
Pyrolysis: Held isothermal at 300 oC for 5 minutes Ramped at 25 oC per minute from 300 oC to 650 oC.
Oxidation: Held isothermal at 400 oC for 3 minutes Ramped at 20 oC per minute from 400 oC to 850 oC. Held isothermal at 850 oC for 5 minutes
Sample weights 80 mg. Roasted fine sand was added to make weights up to 80 mg where required.
Data Processing: Optkin 3.0.0 software supplied by Beicip Franlab - France
Machine Operator Rachel Davenport
Analysis Date 31/5/02
The crucible was oxidized before use by heating to 600 oC in the oxidation oven of the Rock-Eval 6 Turbo. An analysis blank was run with the sample batch. The blank data is automatically subtracted from all analyses.
191
NOTE: The Rock-Eval 6 Turbo instrument measures the temperature of the sample directly beneath the crucible. The temperature recorded at the maximum of the S2 peak is denoted Tpeak on the pyrogram. The thermocouple in the conventional Rock-Eval II (and older) instruments is located on the outside of the pyrolysis oven, and therefore measures the maximum S2 peak (Tmax) at a lower temperature than if the thermocouple was beside the crucible. Since Tmax is the most widely reported value for the maximum S2 peak, a conversion factor is applied to convert Tpeak to Tmax values.
The Rock-Eval 6 Turbo can determine TOC using the oxidation module. The TOC is the sum of the calculated carbon in the S1, S2 and S3 peaks together with the carbon in residual material remaining after pyrolysis. The oxidation module works under a flow of air and oxidation occurs up to 850 oC. For the Rock-Eval 6 instrument carbon monoxide is also detected. Summation of the carbon in all of these components results in TOC and is calculated using the following formula for decarbonated rocks:
TOC = PC (pyrolysable Carbon) + RC (Residual Carbon)
PC (wt %) = [(S1+S2) x 0.83] + [S3 x 12/44] + [(S3 CO+S3’ CO) x 12/28]/10
RC (wt %) = RC CO + RC CO2
RC CO = (S4 CO x 12/28) / 10
RC CO2 = (S4 CO2 x 12/44) / 10
For whole rocks with carbonate replace S3’CO with S3’ CO/2.
192
193
Appendix 3: Results of Size Fraction Experiments
Table A3.1 Reproducibility of data for different size fractions for cuttings sample from Brewster 1A, 2750-2755m (#20010658).
PREP TMAX S1 S2 S3 TOC PI HI OI
<355 429 0.07 1.41 2.78 0.94 0.05 150 296
<355 rpt 428 0.11 1.47 2.81 1.10 0.07 134 255
Average <355 428.5 0.09 1.44 2.80 1.02 0.06 142 276
SD <355 0.50 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.08 0.01 8 20
>355<475um 431 0.09 1.36 2.96 1.02 0.06 133 290
>355<475um rpt 429 0.11 1.48 2.42 0.98 0.07 151 247
Average >355<475 430 0.10 1.42 2.69 1.00 0.07 142 269
SD >355<475 1.00 0.01 0.06 0.27 0.02 0.00 9 22
>475 431 0.04 1.21 2.33 1.09 0.03 111 214
>475 rpt 433 0.07 1.26 1.52 1.10 0.05 115 138
Average >475 432 0.06 1.24 1.93 1.10 0.04 113 176
SD >475 1.00 0.02 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.01 2 38
RECOMBINED 429 0.09 1.49 2.56 1.01 0.06 148 253
Table A3.2 Reproducibility of data for different size fractions for cuttings sample from Brewster 1A, 3695-3700 m (#20010672).
PREP TMAX S1 S2 S3 TOC PI HI OI
<355 444 0.53 2.03 1.36 1.68 0.21 121 81
<355 rpt 446 0.49 2.02 0.52 1.86 0.20 109 28
Average <355 445 0.51 2.03 0.94 1.77 0.20 115 54
SD <355 1.00 0.02 0.00 0.42 0.09 0.01 6 26
>355<475um 443 0.49 1.71 2.34 1.85 0.22 92 126
>355<475um rpt 444 0.51 1.82 1.04 1.76 0.22 103 59
Average >355<475 443.5 0.50 1.77 1.69 1.81 0.22 98 93
SD >355<475 0.50 0.01 0.05 0.65 0.04 0.00 5 34
>475 447 0.45 1.30 1.41 1.73 0.26 75 82
>475 rpt 446 0.45 1.38 0.86 1.82 0.25 76 47
Average >475 446.5 0.45 1.34 1.14 1.78 0.25 75 64
SD >475 0.50 0.00 0.04 0.28 0.05 0.01 0 17
RECOMBINED 444 0.50 2.01 1.09 1.87 0.20 107 58
194
Table A3.3 Comparison of data for different size fractions for cuttings samples from Brewster 1A.
PREP TMAX S1 S2 S3 TOC PI HI OI
Sample Brewster 1A, 2750-2755m (#20010658).
<355 av 428.5 0.09 1.44 2.80 1.02 0.06 142 276
>355<475um av 430 0.10 1.42 2.69 1.00 0.07 142 269
>475 av 432 0.06 1.24 1.93 1.10 0.04 113 176
RECOMBINED 429 0.09 1.49 2.56 1.01 0.06 148 253
Average 430 0.08 1.40 2.49 1.03 0.06 136 243
SD between SANS fraction and recombined
0.50 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.00 2.67 7.55
SD between Sans and average
0.06 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.02 0.00 3.05 12.58
Sample Brewster 1A, 3600-3605m (#20010671).
<355 445 0.92 4.12 1.86 2.50 0.18 165 74
>355<475 446 0.95 4.25 1.50 2.69 0.18 158 56
>475 447 0.93 4.32 1.52 2.79 0.18 155 54
RECOMBINED 447 1.00 4.29 1.63 2.63 0.19 163 62
Average 446 0.95 4.25 1.63 2.65 0.18 160 62
SD between SANS fraction and recombined
0.50 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.00 2.56 3.11
SD between Sans and average
0.13 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00 1.10 2.95
Brewster 1A, 3695-3700 m (#20010672).
<355 av 445 0.51 2.03 0.94 1.77 0.20 115 54
>355<475um av 443.5 0.50 1.77 1.69 1.81 0.22 98 93
>475 av 446.5 0.45 1.34 1.14 1.78 0.25 75 64
RECOMBINED 444 0.50 2.01 1.09 1.87 0.20 107 58
Average 445 0.49 1.79 1.21 1.81 0.22 99 67
SD between SANS fraction and recombined
0.25 0.00 0.12 0.30 0.03 0.01 5 17
SD between Sans and average
0.63 0.00 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.49 12.66
195
Appendix 4: Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Definitions
196
Tabl
e A
4.1
Defi
nitio
ns o
f Roc
k-Ev
al p
yrol
ysis
par
amet
ers
(mod
ified
afte
r Esp
italié
et
al.,
198
5; P
eter
s, 1
986)
.
Para
met
erN
ame
(uni
ts)
Defi
nitio
nSp
ecifi
city
Prob
lem
s/In
form
atio
nTO
CTo
tal O
rgan
ic C
arbo
n(w
t. pe
rcen
t)M
easu
re o
f the
rock
’s o
rgan
ic ri
chne
ss.
Org
anic
rich
ness
.E
rror
s of
up
to 1
0% c
an o
ccur
bet
wee
n ‘L
EC
O’
and
‘Roc
k-E
val’
met
hods
(coa
ls a
re th
e m
ost
diffi
cult
to m
easu
re a
ccur
ate
valu
es u
sing
the
Roc
k-E
val m
etho
d).
S1
mg
hydr
ocar
bons
(e
xtra
ctab
le) /
g ro
ckM
easu
re o
f the
am
ount
of f
ree
hydr
ocar
bons
pr
esen
t in
the
rock
. The
free
hyd
roca
rbon
s ar
e th
ose
ther
mal
ly d
esor
bed
at 3
00o C
for 3
m
inut
es
Ker
ogen
type
(sou
rce
qual
ity).
Mat
urity
.M
igra
ted
oil.
Can
be
seve
rely
affe
cted
(hig
h va
lues
) by
oil-
base
d dr
illin
g flu
id (s
ee T
raps
and
Tip
s)
S2
mg
hydr
ocar
bons
(ker
ogen
py
roly
sate
) / g
roc
kM
easu
re o
f hyd
roca
rbon
s fo
rmed
by
crac
king
of
ker
ogen
, res
ins
and
asph
alte
nes.
The
py
roly
sate
is m
easu
red
from
300
oC to
650
oC
at 2
5oC
/min
.
Ker
ogen
type
. Mat
urity
.H
igh
valu
es m
ay b
e ob
tain
ed if
oil
or b
itum
en
is p
rese
nt (C
lem
entz
, 198
0) a
nd m
iner
al
deco
mpo
sitio
n. D
rillin
g ad
ditiv
es a
lso
caus
e pr
oble
ms;
see
Tra
ps a
nd T
ips.
Low
er v
alue
s ca
n ar
ise
from
ads
orpt
ion
on th
e m
iner
al m
atrix
(E
spita
lié e
t al.,
198
0; O
rr, 1
983)
. The
late
r ‘s
uppr
essi
on’ c
an b
e el
imin
ated
usi
ng is
olat
ed
kero
gen
(see
HI)
S3
mg
CO
2 (o
rgan
ic) /
g ro
ckM
easu
re o
f CO
2 gen
erat
ed fr
om o
xyge
nate
d fu
nctio
nal g
roup
s in
ker
ogen
. The
CO
2 is
colle
cted
from
300
o C to
390
o C a
t 25o C
/min
.
Ker
ogen
type
. Mat
urity
.S
ubje
ct to
inte
rfere
nce
by C
O2 fro
m d
ecom
posi
tion
of c
arbo
nate
min
eral
s (H
orsfi
eld
& D
ougl
as, 1
980;
H
orsfi
eld,
198
4).
S1+
S2
Pot
entia
l Yie
ld (m
g hy
droc
arbo
ns /g
ro
ck)
The
tota
l hyd
roca
rbon
gen
etic
pot
entia
l i.e
. th
e fre
e an
d ke
roge
n-bo
und
hydr
ocar
bons
.S
ourc
e ric
hnes
s.K
erog
en ty
pe.
Sub
ject
to th
e co
mbi
ned
prob
lem
s w
ith S
1 an
d S
2 ab
ove
T max
Max
imum
hei
ght o
f the
S
2 pe
ak in
tem
pera
ture
pr
ogra
m (°
C)
Tem
pera
ture
cor
resp
ondi
ng to
the
max
imum
ra
te o
f hyd
roca
rbon
s ge
nera
ted
from
the
crac
king
of k
erog
en (S
2).
Mat
urity
: Ker
ogen
type
.D
epre
ssed
val
ues
indi
cate
mig
rate
d hy
droc
arbo
ns.
For m
ultip
le p
eaks
in S
2, th
e on
e w
ith th
e hi
ghes
t si
gnal
will
be
assi
gned
Tm
ax. A
nom
olus
ly lo
w
and
high
Tm
ax v
alue
s ca
n re
sult
for t
hese
mix
ed
sour
ces
or d
rillin
g ad
ditiv
es (s
ee T
raps
and
Tip
s),
whi
le h
igh
Tmax
(>50
0o C) c
an a
lso
resu
llt fr
om
min
eral
dec
ompo
sitio
n.Tp
eak
Max
imun
hei
ght
of S
2 pe
ak in
tem
pera
ture
pr
ogra
m (°
C);
RE
6
True
tem
pera
ture
cor
resp
ondi
ng to
the
max
imum
rate
of h
ydro
carb
ons
gene
rate
d fro
m th
e cr
acki
ng o
f ker
ogen
.
Use
d in
the
deriv
atio
n of
ki
netic
par
amet
ers
whe
re
abso
lute
tem
pera
ture
is
need
ed
Tem
pera
ture
mea
sure
d in
side
of t
he o
ven.
Tpe
ak
is a
ppro
xim
atel
y 30
o C g
reat
er th
an T
max
.
197
Para
met
erN
ame
(uni
ts)
Defi
nitio
nSp
ecifi
city
Prob
lem
s/In
form
atio
nP
IP
rodu
ctio
n In
dex
(S1/
S1+
S2)
Ext
ent t
o w
hich
ker
ogen
has
bee
n tra
nsfo
rmed
into
oil
and
gas.
Mat
urity
,. M
igra
ted
oil.
Ano
mal
ous
valu
es c
orre
spon
d to
acc
umul
atio
n or
dr
aina
ge o
f hyd
roca
rbon
s.or
con
tam
inat
ion
PC
Pyr
olys
able
Car
bon
(wt.
perc
ent)
The
amou
nt o
f TO
C re
pres
ente
d by
S1
and
S2.
; PC
= 0
.83*
(S1+
S2)
Sou
rce
richn
ess:
Ker
ogen
type
. Mat
urity
.O
xida
tion
of o
rgan
ic m
atte
r low
ers
the
valu
es.
CC
onve
rsio
n Fa
ctor
(PC
/TO
C) *
100
The
perc
enta
ge o
f TO
C a
vaila
ble
for
conv
ertio
n to
hyd
roca
rbon
s.O
rgan
ic ri
chne
ss, k
erog
en
type
.H
ighe
r val
ues
repr
esen
t inc
reas
ed o
il-pr
ones
e. C
ould
be
used
in th
e sa
me
way
as
HI b
ut ra
rely
is.
BI
Bitu
men
Inde
x(m
g hy
droc
arbo
ns (S
1) /
g TO
C
Am
ount
of f
ree
hydr
ocar
bons
(S1)
nor
mai
lsed
to
TO
C.
BI =
100
* S
2 / T
OC
Sou
rce
rich
ness
, Mat
urity
Am
ount
and
rate
of c
hang
e ca
n be
use
d to
iden
tify
the
onse
t of e
xpul
sion
and
the
begi
nnin
g of
the
gas
win
dow
.H
IH
ydro
gen
Inde
x[m
g hy
droc
arbo
ns (S
2) /
g TO
C]
Am
ount
of h
ydro
carb
ons
rele
ased
on
pyro
lysi
s (S
2) n
orm
alis
ed to
TO
C.
HI =
100
* S
2 / T
OC
Sou
rce
richn
ess,
K
erog
en ty
pe,.
Mat
urity
.H
I > 3
00 in
dica
tes
oil-p
rone
ness
. A th
eroe
tical
ly
max
imum
HI o
f 120
6 is
obt
aine
d fo
r 100
%
conv
ersi
on o
f the
org
anic
mat
ter t
o hy
droc
arbo
ns
assu
min
g th
e pr
opor
tion
of C
in th
e or
gani
c m
atte
r is
0.83
. For
rock
s w
ith T
OC
< 3
% th
e H
I ca
n be
sup
pres
sed
by u
p to
100
%, r
esul
ting
in
the
true
hydr
ocar
bon
pote
ntia
l bei
ng s
ever
ely
unde
rest
imat
ed. I
t is
reco
mm
ende
d th
at H
I de
term
ined
on
isol
ated
ker
ogen
be
used
for
orga
nic-
lean
rock
s.O
IO
xyge
n In
dex
[mg
CO
2 (S
3) /
g TO
C]
Am
ount
of c
arbo
n di
oxid
e re
leas
ed o
n py
roly
sis
norm
alis
ed to
TO
C.
OI =
100
* S
3 / T
OC
Ker
ogen
type
,. M
atur
ity.
Not
relia
ble
in c
arbo
nate
s an
d or
gani
cally
lean
se
dim
ents
. Hig
h va
lues
indi
cate
low
hyd
roca
rbon
yi
elds
. Hig
her O
Is o
ccur
in te
rres
trial
org
anic
or
gani
c m
atte
r wrt
mar
ine
orga
nic
mat
ter
hc h
ydro
carb
ons
Tabl
e A
4.1
Defi
nitio
ns o
f Roc
k-Ev
al p
yrol
ysis
par
amet
ers
(mod
ified
afte
r Esp
italié
et a
l., 1
985;
Pet
ers,
198
6) (c
ont’d
)
198
Table A4.2. Guidelines for interpreting (a) source rock generative potential and (b) type of petroleum generated from immature sediments (VR <0.6 %), and, c) degree of thermal maturation (modified after Peters, 1986; Espitalié and Bordenave,1993).
Table A4.2a. Source rock generative potential (richness) for VR < 0.6 %.
Quantity TOC S2 S1 + S2 EOM HC
Wt % mg hc / g rock mg hc / g rock Wt % ppm
Poor 0 - 0.5 0 - 2.5 0 - 3 <0.05 <200
Fair 0.5 - 1 2.5 - 5 3 - 6 0.05 – 0.1 200 – 500
Good 1 - 2 5 - 10 6 - 12 0.1 – 0.2 500 – 800
Very Good > 2 > 10 > 12 >0.2 >800
* for carbonate lithologies the TOC ‘cutoffs’ are approximately ½ those listed here for clastics
TOC = total organic carbon; S1 = yield of hydrocarbons(hc) released during thermal desorption; S2 = yield of hydrocarbons(hc) released during pyrolysis; EOM = extractable organic matter; HC = free saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon content of rock isolated during solvent extraction.
Table A4.2b Source rock quality for VR < 0.6 %.
Type
Gas*Gas and OilOil
Hydrogen Index(mg hc/g TOC)
50-200200-300>300
Rock Eval S2/S3
1-55-10>10
Extract Yield(mg hc/g TOC)*
<2020-5050-200* mature samples
Atomic H/C
0.6-0.9
0.9-1.1>1.1
* Wet gas content increases with increasing HI, with condensate potential for 150<HI<200
Table A4.2c Source rock thermal maturity.
MaturationLevel
Production Index (PI)
Tmax (oC) (VR %) for Type I
Tmax (oC) (VR %) for Type II
Tmax (oC) (VR %) for Type III
Immature <0.15 <445 (0.8) <435 (0.5) <440 (0.65)
Mature 0.15-0.4 445-455 (0.8-1.0) 435-460 (0.5-1.2) 440-470 (0.65-1.4)
Overmature <0.15 >455 (>1.0) >460 (>1.2) >470 (>1.4)
199
Appendix 5: TOC and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Results
Table A5.1 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Brewster-1A.
AGSO No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20010654 428 0.05 0.4 2.61 0.58 68 447
20010655 430 0.05 0.33 2.18 0.56 60 390
20010656 428 0.05 0.57 2.16 0.23 248 937
20010657 431 0.06 0.85 2.47 0.81 105 305
20010658 431 0.09 1.36 2.96 1.02 133 290
20010659 424 0.15 1.83 2.83 1.11 165 254
20010660 429 0.14 1.85 2.99 1.2 153 249
20010661 432 0.17 1.69 2.83 1.16 146 243
20010662 428 0.12 0.94 2.75 0.88 107 313
20010663 433 0.13 1.15 2.76 1.38 83 200
20010664 433 0.19 1.47 3.07 1.21 122 254
20010665 433 0.2 1.59 2.44 0.99 160 246
20010666 440 0.13 0.93 2.92 1.16 80 251
20010667 434 0.19 1.39 3.5 1.13 123 309
20010668 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
20010669 444 0.24 1.91 1.9 1.51 127 126
20010670 428 0.54 1.94 3.65 0.75 259 488
20010671 446 0.82 3.95 1.89 2.77 143 68
20010672 443 0.49 1.71 2.34 1.85 92 126
20010673 445 0.59 2.06 2.47 2.36 87 105
20010674 408 0.36 2.4 2.38 2.44 98 98
20010675 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
200
Table A5.2 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Carbine-1.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20020084 424 0.11 0.45 2.25 1.02 44 220
20020085 434 0.03 1.87 1.37 1.58 118 86
20020086 423 0.12 0.89 1.15 1.46 61 79
20020087 425 0.07 0.67 1.25 1.42 47 88
20020088 430 0.08 0.57 2.49 1.03 56 243
20020089 439 0.06 1.28 3.14 1.55 83 203
20020090 438 0.08 2.04 1.51 1.91 107 79
Table A5.3 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Adele-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10). S1 values are invalid.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20020066 434 0.03 1.27 1.06 1.36 93 78
20020068 432 0.03 0.94 0.62 1.38 68 45
20020069 429 0.04 1.41 0.40 1.70 83 24
20020070 430 0.06 2.20 0.61 1.54 143 39
20020071 429 0.06 1.92 0.35 1.41 136 25
20020072 434 0.04 2.65 0.56 1.77 150 31
20020073 430 0.08 2.23 0.09 1.8 124 5
20020074 432 0.05 1.67 0.17 1.27 131 13
20020075 431 0.04 1.35 0.58 1.58 85 36
20020076 429 0.06 2.39 0.77 1.84 130 42
20020077 434 0.06 1.55 0.6 1.91 81 31
20020078 433 0.05 1.20 0.64 1.58 76 41
20020079 431 0.06 1.29 0.73 1.54 84 48
20020080 431 0.05 0.83 0.7 1.02 82 69
20020081 436 0.05 1.08 0.67 1.02 105 66
20020082* 416 0.05 2.48 0.34 1.32 188 26
20020083 436 0.04 1.00 0.86 0.90 111 95
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
201
Table A5.4 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Argus-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10). S1 values are invalid.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20020101* 437 0.12 1.2 3.09 1.19 100 259
20020102* 328 0.93 9.34 8.38 3.57 262 235
20020103* 352 1.01 8.24 7.93 2.91 283 273
20020104* 350 1.09 18.01 7.20 4.92 366 146
20020105* 339 0.49 2.84 5.12 1.70 167 301
20020106* 333 0.41 1.89 4.04 1.48 127 273
20020107* 332 0.47 1.90 3.33 1.14 167 292
20020108* 344 0.40 2.20 3.38 1.24 178 273
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
Table A5.5 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Brecknock South-1 extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (90:10).
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20020091 429 0.23 1.52 1.06 0.93 163 114
20020092 428 0.27 2.04 0.83 0.87 235 95
20020093 427 0.28 1.33 0.91 1.08 124 84
20020094 432 0.53 1.58 0.89 1.12 141 80
20020095 436 0.45 2.96 1.19 1.77 167 67
20020096 435 0.46 3.16 0.99 1.72 184 57
20020097 441 0.38 2.10 0.97 1.31 160 74
20020098 436 0.42 2.01 1.04 1.33 150 78
20020099 435 0.14 1.12 1.50 1.22 91 122
20020100* 333 0.31 1.14 1.93 1.24 92 156
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
202
Table A5.6 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings and side-wall-core samples from Crux-1. S1 values are invalid.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
Cuttings
20020109* 318 1.1 3 3.13 1.19 252 263
20020110* 319 1.65 4.27 4.95 2.67 160 186
20020111* 317 0.9 1.41 1.14 1.07 132 106
20020112* 318 1.38 2 2.1 1.18 170 178
20020113* nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
20020114 317 0.79 1.68 2.11 1.15 146 183
20020115* 427 0.47 1.01 1.78 0.99 102 181
20020116 403 0.31 1.45 2.09 1.4 104 149
20020117 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
20020118 442 0.38 2.67 3.68 1.79 149 205
20020119 433 0.16 1.07 2.06 0.72 148 286
20020120 431 0.35 1.81 2.63 0.94 192 279
20020121 434 0.21 1.33 2.24 0.84 158 267
20020122 432 0.22 1.29 2.3 0.78 166 297
20020123 439 0.26 2.34 2.05 1.08 217 191
20020124 436 0.22 2.91 2 1.41 207 142
20020125 438 0.34 2.57 2.46 1.52 169 162
20020126 439 0.32 2.52 2.25 1.41 179 160
20020127 436 0.28 2.76 2.02 1.32 209 153
20020128 431 0.28 3.55 1.66 1.54 230 108
20020129 442 0.37 2.94 1.47 1.66 177 88
20020130* 435 0.33 3.32 2.06 1.68 197 123
20020131* 438 0.28 2.87 1.53 1.79 160 85
SWCs
20020132 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
20020133 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
20020134 432 0.17 0.95 0.45 1.37 69 33
20020135 431 0.15 0.6 0.45 0.65 92 68
20020136 437 0.04 1.47 0.94 0.59 247 158
20020137 442 0.11 4.32 0.99 1.38 313 72
20020138 440 0.11 3.12 1.65 2.28 137 73
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
203
Table A5.7 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Dinichthys-1. S1 values are invalid.
GA No. Tmax S1 S2 S3 TOC HI OI
20010723* 341 0.89 1.42 1.34 0.98 144 137
20010724* 334 1.56 1.88 1.33 1.09 173 122
20010725* 320 2.51 2.5 2.57 1.08 232 238
20010726* 429 1.58 2.62 1.45 1.63 160 89
20010727* 434 1.78 2.75 1.76 nd nd nd
20010728* 433 0.84 2.27 0.99 1.61 141 61
20010729* 423 0.96 2.72 1.04 1.56 174 67
20010730* 435 1.29 2.66 1.40 1.58 169 89
20010731* 436 0.67 2.52 0.34 1.57 160 21
20010732* 436 1.21 3.2 1.17 1.79 178 66
20010733* 421 0.87 3.61 1.03 1.69 213 61
20010734* 318 0.95 1.91 1.22 1.44 133 85
20010735* 320 0.83 1.61 0.67 1.33 121 50
20010736 437 0.55 1.67 0.80 nd nd nd
20010737 439 0.36 1.63 1.30 nd nd nd
20010738 447 0.61 3.82 0.53 2.11 181 25
20010739 447 0.61 2.86 0.53 1.72 167 31
20010740 447 0.57 3.52 1.53 2.34 151 65
20010741 454 0.49 2.57 0.59 nd nd nd
20010742 455 0.54 2.41 0.69 2.65 91 26
20010743* 432 0.61 2.85 1.01 2.50 114 40
20010744 450 0.20 0.83 0.97 0.99 84 98
20010745* 397 0.19 1.57 1.59 1.01 155 157
20010746* 324 0.63 1.39 1.20 1.35 103 89
20010747* 367 0.18 1.74 2.80 2.40 72 117
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
204
Table A5.8 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Gorgonichthys-1. S1 values are invalid.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20010676* 337 0.56 2.30 1.42 1.03 224 139
20010677* 417 0.10 0.87 0.74 0.85 102 87
20010678 420 0.04 0.70 0.57 1.40 50 41
20010679 428 0.06 1.62 0.50 1.28 127 39
20010680 431 0.04 1.25 0.38 1.18 106 32
20010681 433 0.04 1.58 0.42 1.26 125 33
20010682 432 0.03 1.33 0.31 1.33 100 23
20010683 431 0.08 3.11 0.55 1.65 188 33
20010684 432 0.15 3.87 0.59 1.60 243 37
20010685 426 0.23 3.28 0.57 1.46 224 39
20010686 427 0.10 1.79 0.45 1.53 117 29
20010687 431 0.11 2.97 0.51 1.44 206 36
20010688 431 0.07 1.71 0.62 1.17 146 53
20010689 430 0.17 3.29 0.76 1.27 259 60
20010691 435 0.10 2.88 0.48 1.32 218 36
20010692 436 0.10 3.11 0.50 1.77 176 28
20010695 441 0.09 2.55 0.74 2.00 128 37
20010696 432 0.15 3.71 0.43 2.67 139 16
20010697 436 0.06 1.33 0.44 0.83 160 53
20010698* 431 0.11 3.87 0.54 1.09 354 49
20010699* 425 0.08 2.92 0.72 1.03 283 70
20010700* 431 0.10 3.00 0.58 1.62 185 36
20010701* 423 0.09 2.43 0.60 0.76 317 79
20010702* 426 0.07 1.47 0.55 0.42 352 131
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.
205
Table A5.9 TOC and Rock-Eval pyrolysis results for cuttings samples from Titanichthys-1. S1 values are invalid.
GA No. TMAX S 1 S 2 S 3 TOC H I O I
(oC) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) (wt%)
20010703 426 0.02 0.26 0.24 0.77 34 31
20010704* 421 0.03 0.61 0.19 1.18 52 16
20010705 431 0.02 1.52 0.16 1.44 106 11
20010706 428 0.02 1.48 0.1 1.38 107 7
20010707 428 0.04 2.21 0.09 1.61 137 5
20010708 431 0.04 2.93 0.04 1.68 175 2
20010709 429 0.03 1.19 0.03 1.06 111 3
20010710 430 0.03 1.34 0.03 1.64 82 2
20010711 430 0.07 1.98 0.61 1.81 109 33
20010712 429 0.06 1.47 0.42 0.93 158 45
20010713* 422 0.08 2.77 0.39 1.39 199 28
20010714 429 0.11 3.03 0.65 1.37 222 47
20010715 437 0.07 2.85 0.4 1.14 249 35
20010716 433 0.11 3.72 0.69 1.42 263 49
20010717 442 0.07 3.99 0.44 1.99 200 22
20010718 441 0.06 4.04 0.46 2.76 146 17
20010719 442 0.08 2.73 0.72 1.68 162 43
20010720 444 0.11 2.8 0.55 2.23 126 25
20010721 441 0.07 1.74 0.6 1.43 122 42
20010722* 417 0.16 2.35 0.87 0.83 284 105
* Data shows significant levels of glycol contamination after extraction.