How the pore scale affects the field scale: Real world examples

Post on 19-Jan-2016

41 views 0 download

description

How the pore scale affects the field scale: Real world examples. David A. DiCarlo. Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX. Acknowledgments. University of Texas Hassan Dehghanpour Behdad Aminzadeh Mohammad Mirzaei. Stanford University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of How the pore scale affects the field scale: Real world examples

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering

The University of Texas at AustinAustin, TX

How the pore scale affects the field scale: Real world examples

David A. DiCarlo

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Acknowledgments

Stanford UniversityAkshay SahniMartin Blunt

University of TexasHassan Dehghanpour

Behdad AminzadehMohammad Mirzaei

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Variety of flow scales

Continuum ScalePore Scale Field Scale

GasOil

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Interests and motivation

The configuration of fluids at the pore-scale controls flow and transport at field scales Three-phase (gas, oil, water) flow Preferential flow Unsaturated flow in fractures In-situ measurements of pore filling Fluid-fluid interfacial area in porous media Continuum and discrete formulations of flow

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

NAPL

Water

Three-phase (gas, oil, water) flow

Essential component of oil recovery or aquifer remediation

GasOil

Oil recovery by gas injection Leaking gasoline

Key parameters: Residual oil (Sor) and flow speed (kro)

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Prudhoe Bay’s extra oil At best, only 50% of the original oil in

a reservoir is recovered by a waterflood

Prudhoe Bay’s eventual recovery will be over 70%! (>$100 B difference)

Why?• Prudhoe Bay is the world’s largest

gas injection operation

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Objectives Understand at a basic physical level

why high recoveries are possible for three-phase flow

Develop a quick method to measure three-phase relative permeability (normalized recovery rate)

Systematically measure three-phase relative permeability as a function of wettability and saturation history

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Experimental set-up Create 1m long sandpacks with

varying degrees of wettability Fill sandpacks with oil and water, then

open the bottom and let drain out Use dual-energy computed

tomography (CT) to measure the saturation of each phase versus position and time

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

9

Experimental Set-up

Oil phase N-octane, Aqueous phase 10 wt % NaBr , Gas phase Air

Vertical Positioning System

Effluent

Gas Invades the System

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Long time saturation vs position and time – initial experiments

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 20 40 60 80 100

z (cm from the top)

Oil

Sat

ura

tio

n

initial

5 hours

22 hours

46 hours

4 days

9 days

25 days

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Calculating Relative Permeabilities

ui = -(K/) kr(Si) Pi/x

To directly measure the relative permeability of a phase you need

• The fluid saturation - Si

• The flux - ui

• The pressure gradient - Pi/x

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Saturation vs Position and Time

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 20 40 60 80 100

z (cm from the top)

Oil

Sat

ura

tio

n

initial

5 hours

22 hours

46 hours

4 days

9 days

25 days

oil moved saturation

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Measured Relative Permeability Can measure

relative permeability over 6 orders of magnitude

Measure with different wettabilities

Measure with different initial states

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Oil Permeability Remains Finite to Low Saturations

Oil relative permeability depends on wettability

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Oil trapping after waterflood

solidgrain

water

trappedoil

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

No oil trapping after gasflood

oillayers

gas

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Oil remains mobile to very low saturations

Water becomes immobileat around Sw = 0.1

Oil and water are not interchangeable

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Fluids on water-wet and oil-wet surfaces

gw

ow

gogo

gas

water-wet surface

oil

water

gw

ow

gowater

oil

gasgw

oil-wet surface

Oil spreads on water

Water beads on oil

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Fluids in pore corners

Oil layers at low So Oil cannot be

trapped

go

ow

oil gas

water

ow

gas

gw

water

oil

water-wet corner oil-wet corner

No water layers!Water can be

trapped

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Layers Show up at Low Sat

All oil in layers

q ~ r4

So ~ A~ r2

kro ~ So2

go

ow

oil gas

water

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Current work – Three Phase

Comparing results to Stone and saturated average three-phase permeability models

Can possibly fit by changing the residuals Extending reconnection work to different

wettabilities Measure pressures, and do with real rock

cores and CO2 ?????

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Interests and motivation

The configuration of fluids at the pore-scale controls flow and transport at field scales Three-phase (gas, oil, water) flow Preferential flow – flow at frontal interfaces Unsaturated flow in fractures In-situ measurements of nano-particles Surfactant imbibition into oil-wet media Continuum and discrete formulations of flow

CPGEDepartment Seminar, Apr 18, 2011

Thanks for your attention!