Post on 11-Jun-2018
Running head: HIGH SCOPE 1
High Scope: A Curriculum Framework Research
Kim Y. Bailey
Concordia University St. Paul, ECE 526-621
Catherine A. Arentsen, M.A.Ed.
February 21, 2013
HIGH SCOPE 2
High Scope: A Curriculum Framework Research
The High Scope curriculum is a well-known approach in the early childhood education
field. High Scope was developed in the early 1600’s by Dr. David Weikart. Dr. Weikart created
High Scope to improve education in Ypsilanti, Michigan. Dr. Weikart questioned why children
living in poor neighborhoods were achieving low scores and found that these children were
achieving low scores due to the lack of opportunities. He also found that the early interventions
were the appropriate approach in achieving improvement. The High Scope approach is claimed
to be a good and effective quality preschool curriculum, especially for disadvantage children
(Holt 2007). Due to this claim it is only appropriate that a research framework was created for
the High Scope curriculum. The framework includes key aspects of the curriculum:
The philosophy of which this curriculum is based.
Research to support evidence of effectiveness.
The framework of High Scope (environment, materials, the role of the teacher and
the child).
Evaluation of the whole curriculum in comparison with current standards.
Philosophy
High Scope’s name was chosen because of its meaning. High is the individual level of
achievement, wished for all children. Scope is the range in which support is offered to the
children to be able to reach this level. Dr. Weikart and his team looked at Jean Piaget’s theories
on child development. The team used Jean Piaget’s theories within the curriculum because his
theories support the teams’ belief towards active learning. Jean Piaget’s ideas of child
development (as cited in Schweinhart 2003) see “children as active learners, who learn best from
activities that they themselves plan, carry out, and reflect upon” (p. 1). The basic High Scope
HIGH SCOPE 3
framework is that “active learning is its core and that children learn through key experiences
gained from the world around them and from their own discoveries (Holt 2007).
In 1970 Dr. Weikart and his team created the High Scope Education Research
Foundation. In creating this foundation, it was created to research, development, training, and do
public outreach for lifting lives with education (High Scope, 2013). The High Scope Foundation
continues to produce materials to support the curriculum to the present (Holt 2007). High
Scope’s mission “is to lift lives through education and envisions a world in which all educational
settings use active participatory learning so everyone has a chance to succeed in life and
contribute to society” (High Scope, p.1, 2013).
Research
High Scope has published over 40 years of research (Holt, 2007). The most popular
research done was the Perry Preschool Project. The Perry Preschool Project led the ground
research work for High Scope. The Perry Preschool Project used the High Scope curriculum
when performing this research. Other researches that were done for High Scope includes
following ups and validations of The Perry Preschool Project.
The Perry Pre-school Project study was designed to follow young children living in
poverty and assign them to a high quality preschool program or to a no preschool group. The
data was collected when the children were in preschool and continued to be collected through
childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. This study consisted of 123 African American children
who were invited to do this study because of location of residency (poor neighborhood) and
because they scored low on the intelligence test at the study entrance. The data was collected
from parents at the age of 3 and15; achievement tests were done annually at ages 7 through 11,
14, 19, and 27. Data was also collected from school, police, and social services records. It was
HIGH SCOPE 4
found that the High Scope Preschool contributed to the children’s education performance,
economic productivity, and social responsibility (Schweinhart, 2003).
A current study was done using the Perry Preschool Program. The researchers did this by
doing a cost benefit analysis with a follow up study, when the original participants were 40 years
old. There was 97% of the original participants, which was still alive, to do this follow up. There
were two key components that would effectively help with the cost benefits analysis. The first
was the accurate information on the cost of the program and secondly, all of the measures would
be put in financial terms. New data was collected at age 40 to calculate lifetime economic
difference between the High Scope Preschool program and none preschool participants. This
study collected data with their earning profiles, tax contributions, criminal activity, impact on
welfare, and other additional costs (e.g. childcare, savings, etc…). The findings showed that
“preschooling that raises education and skill levels may raise economic well-being through
enhanced employment prospects and does reduce criminal activity” (Belfield, Nores, Barnett, &
Schweinhart 2006). With these findings the cost of the Perry Preschool Program was well worth
it.
Schweinhart and Weikart (1998) assess three distinct preschool curriculum models to see
which may work best. The study worked with 68 children born in poverty. The children are ages
three and four. They were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. The three curriculum
models were:
Direct instruction – which uses a scripted approach, in which teachers’ present activities
and the children are expected to respond to them. The activities used were sequenced
with academic lessons.
High Scope
HIGH SCOPE 5
Traditional nursery school – child centered approach in which children initiate activities
and teachers respond.
Based on reports, at age 23, the children who attended the traditional nursery school or using the
High Scope had significant advantages over the direct instruction curriculum.
Six percent from the traditional nursery school and High Scope students needed support
with emotional impairment or disturbance treatment during school; as opposed to direct
instructions with 47%.
43% of High Scope and 44% of nursery school engaged in volunteer work; as opposed to
11% who attended the program using direct instruction.
High Scope had further advantages compared to direct instruction:
Only 10% of the group using the High Scope curriculum were arrested compared to 39%
of the direct instruction group
70% of the High Scope group planned on graduation from college compared to 36% of
the direct instruction group
Nursery school had two additional advantages over direct instruction:
The nursery school group only had nine percent arrested for felony at ages 22-23, while
direct instruction had 34%.
None from the nursery school group was ever suspended from work; whereas 27% of the
direct instruction group had been suspended.
Framework
High Scope has five basic areas that the curriculum follows. The tool used is called The
High Scope Preschool Wheel of Learning. The High Scope Preschool Wheel of Learning is a
simple way of communicating some of the key elements of the High Scope curriculum. The
HIGH SCOPE 6
Wheel of learning includes five different areas; there are important details within each area to
make sure the approach is appropriate. These details are:
1. Active learning
Children engaging in learning
2. Adult-child interaction
Interaction strategies
Encouragement
Problem-solving approach to conflict
3. Learning environment
Areas
Materials
Storage
4. Daily routine
Plan-do-Review
Small-group time
Large-group time
5. Assessments
Teamwork
Daily anecdotal notes
Daily planning
Child assessment
HIGH SCOPE 7
Active Learning
Active learning is placed in the middle of the wheel because of its importance to the
children’s learning. Children use their senses to explore and seek out their own answers to
questions. Adults still continue to support children in solving their own problems. Hohmann and
Weikart (as cited in Holt, 2007) states that “active learning is defined as learning in which the
child, by acting on objects and interacting with people, ideas and events, constructs new
understanding”.
Adult-child interaction
Adults and children work together respectfully to focus on the children’s strengths. High
Scope distinguishes that in “active learning” children “initiate” activities of interest. The children
get to choose where they are interested in spending their day. “Control” is shared between the
student and teacher rather than “controlled” by child or teacher (child-directed or teacher
directed). In the High Scope setting children are encouraged instead of praised. High Scope
believes comments should be specific to the child’s actions. When children are praised, there is
room for comparison and competition. However, through encouragement, children are in control
and can make evaluators of their own work (Holt 2007).
When there is a conflict that arises, the High Scope approach uses this opportunity as a
learning opportunity. The role of the adult is to follow the six steps to conflict resolution when
working with children. The six steps to conflict resolution are (Holt, 2007):
1. Approach the situation calmly – watch what is going on and try to be positive. Get to the
child’s level and use a calm voice. Reach out to the upset child by allowing him or her to
come to you.
2. Recognize the child’s feelings – e.g. you look sad, Amy or you sound angry Sam
HIGH SCOPE 8
3. Gather information and restate the problem – listen to both children and ask questions to
understand what is going on.
4. Ask for solutions or ideas – support and encourage children to talk to one another.
5. Retell any suggested solutions – Acceptance of children’s suggestions for solutions.
6. Support children to act on their decision - encourage children to resolve their own
problems and be near to clarify the decisions if needed.
Learning environment
Active learning is a key factor to the children’s success. The learning environment is set
up so that the children can play alone or in small groups. The areas that are included in the
classroom are classified as sand and water, creative and art area, block and construction area,
music and movement area, book and writing area, and toy and small world area. Areas are
divided by many things (e.g. shelves and furniture). Using shelves as dividers provide storage for
items and toys. The items used for the dividers are kept short enough for the teachers to see over
them to supervise the children. There is a good amount of variety in the materials so the children
can explore. The areas also reflect its community. Cultures are respected and shared within the
classroom. The areas are well labeled and have meaning to the children. Labels can consist of the
names, pictures, or example of items.
The learning environment is also very important to the support of children’s active
learning. There are five basic ingredients to support active learning through the environment
(Holt 2007):
1. Materials – items are for children to play with. There is a variety available for the
children’s use. These items may include every day object (e.g. pots and pans), natural
HIGH SCOPE 9
materials (e.g. stones and leaves), tools (e.g. scissors and mops), messy items (e.g. water
and soap), large heavy items (e.g. big blocks), and smaller items (e.g. Lego and buttons).
2. Manipulation – opportunities offered to children for exploration and work in their own
way.
3. Choice – children are given a choice to choose their own materials and decide how to use
them.
4. Language – children talk about what they are doing or have done, they get a chance to
reflect about their learning and build relationships with others.
5. Support – adults join in play and ask “real questions” about what the children are doing.
Daily Routine
High Scopes daily routine is consistent and flexible at the same time. The daily routine
offers consistency for children and creates security (children to understand what is coming next)
and flexibility for unplanned learning. An important tool used for the daily routine is the plan-do-
review. The plan-do-review is used daily. The children get to plan what they want to do during
the day. They do it. Then at the end of the day they reviewed what they did (Holt 2007).
Assessment
Assessment is very important in the High Scope curriculum. Observations are done by
using the Child Observation Record (COR). COR is used to accurately record observations of
children and in doing so provide knowledgeable information on individual development and
ability in children. The adult interacts with children and at the same time they are making
anecdotal notes about the children during play. The anecdotal record is then transferred to the
COR at a later time. Teamwork is very important because anyone can write an anecdotal note on
a child. The COR is completed and shared with parents three times a year. Since the COR give
HIGH SCOPE 10
the adult the understanding where the child is planning can be made for individualization for the
child (Holt 2007).
Training
It is important to understand that the High Scope Foundation does offer trainings and
workshops for teachers and administrators to learn how to effectively implement the High Scope
approach. High Scope also offers conferences and events for educational purposes to the
community. Teachers can be certified through High Scope to provide high-quality education
using High Scope. Programs can also be certified through High Scope but must meet the proper
requirements (High Scope 2013).
Evaluation
With the lens of a reader, High Scope’s curriculum framework seems to overall have
effectiveness in its promotion for early childhood education. Stebbins, St. Pierre, Proper,
Anderson and Cerva states (as cited in Schweinhart and Weikart, 1999) that “children who
experienced High/Scope had significantly higher achievement test scores than other students
did” (p. 78). Evaluation is important to see the success or unsuccessfulness of High Scope’s
curriculum. A comparison with the National Association for the Education of Young Children
(NAEYC) Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP), NAEYC’s Curriculum Evaluation,
and Tools of the Mind (Tools) will be shared to show overall effectiveness of High Scope.
NAEYC’s DAP of Curriculum
NAEYC is one of the most trusted and respected leaders in the field for children.
NAEYC has principles of DAP specifically related to curriculum and instruction and practices.
NAEYC (2009) states that “the profession’s responsibility to promote quality in the care and
HIGH SCOPE 11
education of young children compels us to revisit regularly the validity and currency of our core
knowledge and positions, such as this one on issues of practice” (p.1).
NAEYC (2009) states that there are three core considerations in DAP. These three core
considerations are needed for everyday decisions. With this, teachers need to keep in mind the
children’s individual goals and be intentional in achieving these goals. The three core
considerations of DAP are:
1. Knowledge of child development and learning- teachers who are knowledgeable can
make broad predictions about developmentally appropriate practices towards children’s
ability individually and in groups.
2. Individualization – teachers must use variety of methods (e.g. observations, clinical
interview, examination of child’s work) to get to know a child’s abilities within a group
well.
3. Social and cultural contexts - respecting and understanding of what parents and families
consider to be appropriate, their values, and expectations.
In comparison with High Scope and these three core considerations in DAP, High Scope
does meet its standards. High Scope provides training and certification on how to appropriately
embed the curriculum. Teachers use the COR to see where the children are individually and
attain this knowledge through anecdotal records. Teachers are respectful and include community
awareness within its curriculum as well.
NAEYC’s Curriculum Evaluation
NAEYC (2003) states that implementation of curriculum needs to be “thoughtfully
planned, challenging, engaging, developmentally appropriate, culturally and linguistically
responsive, comprehensive, and likely to promote positive outcomes for all young children” (p.
HIGH SCOPE 12
2). NAEYC (2003) has the following indicators for determining the effectiveness of a curriculum
(p.2):
Children are active and engaged
Goals are clear and shared by all
Curriculum is evidence-based
Valued contend is learned through investigation, play, and focused, intentional teaching
Curriculum build on prior learning and experiences
Curriculum is comprehensive
Professional standards validate the curriculum’s subject-matter content
Curriculum is likely to benefit children
In comparison with NAEYC’s curriculum evaluation, the High Scope curriculum does
meet all of its indicators for effectiveness. High Scope believes that children learn through active
investigation and play. High Scope’s curriculum has over 40 years of research data that does
show proof of the benefits to children. High Scope’s Preschool Wheel of Learning and its
contents show evidence that all indicators of effectiveness are met.
Tools
Tools follow Vygotsky’s theories, while High Scope follows Piaget. Although their
theories may have differences, they have similarities as well. Due to these similarities, Tools and
High Scope have similar beliefs.
Insight on Development thought process
o Piaget – center of child development is cognition.
o Vygotsky- mostly focused on developmental thinking (wanted to add emotion but
died at early age).
HIGH SCOPE 13
Child development is a series of qualitative changes that cannot be viewed as merely an
expanding repertoire of skills and ideas (Bodrova & Leong, 2007, p. 29)
Children are active in their acquisition of knowledge.
o Cole and Wertsch, 2002, (as cited in Bodrova & Leong, 2007) explain it as a
vessel, waiting to be filled with knowledge (p.29).
o It was noted it is different from behaviorism – which learning is determined
primarily by external (environmental) variables and stimuli.
Both theories describe construction of knowledge in mind. They both agree that children
construct their own understanding – with age and experience these understandings are
restructured.
Elements of theories are similar
o Piaget- formal thinking includes abstract, logical, reflective and hypothetical
o Vygotsky- higher mental functions includes logic, abstract thinking, and self-
reflection.
Bodrova and Leong (2007) state that "mental tools" is something that helps us solve
problems. Vygotsky believes (as cited in Bodrova & Leong (2007) that "mental tools” plays a
very important role in the development of the mind (p. 4). Children who are taught with
intentional direct teachings with facts and support for enhancing skills, children will be able to
achieve learning with self-directions. Children will be able to take some responsibility for their
own learning because they can take learning as a self-directed activity. In High Scope the Plan-
Do-Review can also help achieve learning in self-direction. The children do take some
responsibility for their own learning through their own investigations through active learning.
HIGH SCOPE 14
Instructional strategies are intentional teaching strategies teachers use to scaffold children
(Bodrova and Leong (2007). In order for the teacher to engage in instructional strategies a
teacher must know his/her children individually (Arentsen, 2013, p.1). A list of strategies (as
cited in Arentesen, 2013) is:
Acknowledgement
Encouragement
Giving specific feedback
Demonstrate
Create or add challenge
Ask questions
Give assistance
Provide information
Give direction
High Scope meets all of this intentional teaching guidance within its Preschool Wheel of
Learning.
Conclusion
High Scope has proven to be an effective curriculum through this research framework
evaluation. High Scope meets current standards and the children benefit from its approach. High
Scope has over 40 years of research to back up its claim of validity. High Scope is a strong
curriculum and supports children’s individual and group growth of development. The Plan-do-
Review helps children learn how to self-regulate with decision making and enhance children’s
cognitive growth. High Scope also supports family engagement and respect diversity.
HIGH SCOPE 15
If I was to choose a curriculum to embed into my classroom; by using this information I
have gained from this evaluation. I would definitely use this curriculum because of the strong
research that backs up its validity. I would not change any information and teaching strategies
because High Scope has been proven to achieve great developmental growth in children. High
Scope also supports family engagement and I applaud this method of support for families.
Just a note to the side: When comparing the High Scope to the current curriculum I am
using in my classroom; I would not choose High Scope. I believe as an educator, I must be able
to feel compatible with a curriculum to appropriately apply its practices and follow through on
its approach. I am currently very compatible and comfortable with the current curriculum I am
using and it also meets Minnesota State Standards, DAP, and NAEYC’s curriculum standards for
requirements in preschool settings.
HIGH SCOPE 16
Resources
Arensten, C. (n.d.) Considering instructional strategies. Concordia University. Retrieved from
https://blackboard.csp.edu/webapps/portal
Belfield, C. R., Nores, M., Barnett, S., & Schweinhart, L. (2006). The High/Scope Perry
Preschool Program. Journal Of Human Resources, 41(1), 162-190. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csp.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=5f0bd0ac-
ab37-464e-8ec8-c40821e9acbc%40sessionmgr14&vid=6&hid=11
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early
childhood education. (2 Ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
HighScope Educational Research Foundation (High Scope) (2013). High Scope inspiring
educators to inspire children: About us. High Scope. Retrieved from
http://www.highscope.org/Content.asp?ContentId=761
Holt, N. (2007). Bringing the High/Scope approach to your early years practice. New York, NY:
Routledge
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (2009). Developmentally
appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age
8. NAEYC. Retrieved from https://blackboard.csp.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-174045-dt-
content-rid-2426852_1/courses/20132023781/NAEYC%20Position%20Statement
%20on%20Developmentally%20Approriate%20Practice.pdf
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (2003). Early childhood
curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation: Building an effective, accountable
system in programs for children birth through age 8. NAEYC. Retrieved from
https://blackboard.csp.edu/b bcswebdav/pid -174045-dt-content-rid2426853
HIGH SCOPE 17
_1/courses/20132023781/ NAEYC%20 Position%20Statement%20on%20
Curriculum%2C%20Assessment%20and%20Program%20Evaluation.pdf
Schweinhart, L. J. (2003). Validity of the High/Scope preschool education model. High/Scope
Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.highscope.org/file/Research/highscope_
curriculum/preschool_validity.pdf
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1999). The Advantages of High/Scope: Helping Children
Lead Successful Lives. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 76. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csp.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=7948c4f7-
f46c-466a-8304-6ba5db227791%40sessionmgr4&vid=2&hid=11
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1998). Why curriculum matters in early childhood
education. Educational Leadership, 55(6), 57. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csp.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=8526531c-
fb4d-4c10-8fae-5f6a23a69b95%40sessionmgr12&vid=10&hid=10