HB201 Assignment 1

Post on 13-Sep-2015

215 views 1 download

description

HB201 Assignment 1

Transcript of HB201 Assignment 1

May 2015 August 2015HB201 MALAYSIAN EXPERIENTIAL TOURISMAssignment 1

DUE DATE for SUBMISSION and PRESENTATION: __5th June 2015__ (Group Write up - Hard Copy/Soft Copy = during class hour/email)

1. Write up (15 marks) It carries 15% of your total mark of 60%. Select 1 country from the 7 continents and analyze the countries tourism websites. Compare and contrast each websites with Malaysias tourism website. Discuss the areas that can be improve to elevate the current website. You may add any additional pictures, information, suggestion or ideas relevant to the topic. Format Font Arial or Times New Roman, size 11 Paragraph Justified Margin Left, Top & Bottom (1 inch), Right (1.5 inch) Assignment should be comb binding

Plagiarism (accidental or intentional) is strictly not allowed. It should be your OWN work. ORIGINALITY and CREATIVITY of the presentation

POLICIES

1. Late Submission of Assignments Requests for an extension of time for submission of an assessment item must be lodged at least 3 days before the due date for the assessment item. Requests received on or after the due date will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. Extension requests must be made in writing to the Course lecturer, and be accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation (3 days before). Where an extension has not been granted, an assessment item submitted after the due date will be penalised as follows: the mark awarded to the item will be reduced by 10% of the maximum possible mark for each day that the assessment item is late. For example: 1 day late = 10% deduction, 2 days late = 20%, 3 days late = 30%, No assignment will be accepted after 3 days delay. Each weekend (from Saturday to Sunday) will count as one day.

2. Plagiarism / Academic MisconductStudents must conduct their studies at the University honestly, ethically and in accordance with accepted standards of academic conduct. Any form of academic conduct which is contrary to these standards is academic misconduct for which the University may penalise a student.

Specifically it is academic misconduct for a student to: present copied, falsified or improperly obtained data as if it were the result of laboratory work, field trips or other investigatory work; include in the student's individual work material which is the result of significant assistance from another person if that assistance was unacceptable according to the instructions or guidelines for that work; assist another student in the presentation of that student's individual work in a way that is unacceptable according to the instructions or guidelines for that work; cheat; (Cheating is dishonest conduct in assessment); Plagiarise; (Plagiarism is knowingly presenting the work or property of another person as if it were one's own.)

Full and detailed acknowledgement (e.g. notation, and/or bibliography) must be provided if contributions are drawn from literature in preparation of reports and assignments. Your written work must properly cite/reference original work, author(s), etc.

Quotations should be used sparingly in written work. It is not acceptable to submit assignments or pieces of written work that contain a large amount of other authors work even when the source is appropriately acknowledged.

On determination that academic misconduct has taken place, the penalty which may be imposed on the student is one or more of the following:

a. a reduced or nil result for the assessment item affected by the academic misconduct;b. a fail grade for the course in which academic misconduct occurred;c. exclusion from enrolment in the program for a specified period;d. Exclusion from the program; readmission to the program is at the discretion of the Faculty based on consideration of the student's case for readmission.

Where a student has been found guilty of academic misconduct on more than one occasion and has previously been penalised as set out in above a. - c., the penalty shall normally be exclusion from the program as set out in d., unless in the opinion of the relevant Assessment Board there are mitigating circumstances.