Grundtvig learning partnership project

„ EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES OF OFFENDERS”

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

MADRID(6-11 th May 2013)

MEETING EVALUATION

Team Coordinator Assessment

Number of participants: 6

Focus on 4 themes:

1) Communication among the partners

2) Activities

3) Mobilty

4) Involvement of local Community

1) Communications among the partners

• All the coordinators shared informations with partners

• All the groups shared informations via e-mail

• Group meetings were made weekly or close to the deadlines.

2) Activities

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Exchange of mate-rial

Laboratory activi-ties

On field work

Study/research

Social/cultural ac-tivities

Meetings of Work-ing Group

Conference

Seminars

Number of Groups per activity made

The only two activities which should be improved are ‘’Study/Research’’ and ‘’On Field Work’’

The main problems to cope with for the team.Item/Grade of problem

Low Medium High Very high

a) Lack of time 2 4 0 0b) Lack of human resources

1 5 0 0

c) Lack of competencies

5 0 1 0

d) Problems in coordination

4 1 1 0

e) Financial problems

2 3 1 0

f) Administrative problems

5 1 0 0

Maybe the only problems for the team were ‘’Lack of time and human resources’’ and ‘’Financial problems’’

3) Mobility

What grade of difficulty will your group face in order to accomplish the programmed mobility activities?

Most of the groups answered the group would have had no problems in facing the mobilty activities.

ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL PROBLEMS THE GROUP COULD FACE:

Problems in mobility

There were no real problems in mobility

Item/Grade of problem

Low Medium High Very high

a) Lack of time 3 2 1 0

b) Lack of human resources

4 0 2 0

c) Lack of competencies

6 0 0 0

d) Problems in coordination

4 2 0 0

e) Financial problems

6 0 0 0

f) Administrative problems

4 0 2 0

Preparatory activities for mobility

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Coordination activities

Production of material/documents/

reports

Laboratory activities

On field work

Study/research

Social/cultural activities

Meetings of Working Group

Conference

Seminars

Number of groups

4) Involvement of local Community

In this part of the questionnaire the focus was on the organizations of each country,

involved in the making of this project.

Commitment for each institutionOrganizations No Commitment Low

CommitmentHigh Commitment

Very High Commitment

Local government 0 0 6 0

Other similar organizations

0 4 2 0

Research Institutes/Universities

4 0 2 0

Organizations of third sector

1 5 0 0

Enterprises 5 1 0 0

The local government and other similar organizations were the most involved.

In particular they gave their contribution to the ‘’implementation of the activities’’ and to the

‘’organization of events’’.

Satisfaction Assessment Number of participants: 15

• It concerned general informations about the meeting in Spain and the satisfaction about some aspects of the meeting

• Section 1: General informations about the meeting• Section 2: Satisfaction of participants

1) General informations about the meeting

The first part of the questionnaire investigated the intensity of the

activities presented during the meeting

Educational trips

Exchange of material

Laboratory activities

On field work

On desk Study/research

Social/cultural activities

Conference

Seminars

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Intensity of activities

High Intensive Intensive Less Intensive None

• The highest intensity was for ‘’Educational trips’’, ‘’Social/Cultural activities’’ and ‘’On desk study/Research’’

• We should have improved the intensity of ‘’Laboratory activities’’ and ‘’On field work’’

2) Satisfaction of Participants

This part of the questionnaire focused on the satisfaction upon:

• Project Coordinator

• Meeting Coordinator

• Team Leader

Planning activities

Key Partnership relations

Capacity to manage on-going process

Transparency with regards to aims

Involving groups by developing open dialogue

Ability to lead the argumentative stage

Capacity to understand specific needs

Empathy demonstrated

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Satisfaction with Project Coordinator

Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied

The satisfaction, in this case, is pretty high for all the items, apart from the ‘’Involvement of the groups’’ and the ‘’Trasparency on aims’’

Logistics

Materials/documents provided

ICT instruments provided

Key partnership relations developed and implemented

Transparency with regard to aims and activities

Involving group by developing open dialogue

Ability to lead the argumentative stage

Capacity to understand specific needs

Empathy Demonstrated

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Satisfaction with Meeting Coordinator

Very Satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied

Regarding the Madrid Meeting Coordinator, almost all the participants were fully satisfied with ‘’Logistics’’, ‘’Group Involvement’’, ‘’Key partnership relations development’ and‘’Materials provided’’

Direction provided in order to develop and accomplish the meeting

Motivation and support provided for the workgroup

Transparency with regard to aims and activities

Involving the group by developing open dialogue and empowerment

Activities and commitment distributed equally among the staff

Understand specific needs

Empathy demonstrated

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Satisfaction with Team Leader

Very Satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied

The results of this schedule didn’t show any critic points regarding the team leaders

SummaryTeam Coordinator:

• More Study/Research and on field work

• Main problems for the group: Lack of time and human resources/ Financial problems

To improve:• On field work• Involvement of the groups by

developing open dialogue• Trasparency on aims

Team coordinator:

• Perfect comunications among the partners

• No real problems for the group

• No problems in mobility

• Good preparation for mobility

• High involvement of Local Government and Organizations

Satisfaction:

• Educational trips, Social/cultural activities, On desk study/research

• Satisfaction with the Project Coordinator

• High Satisfaction with the Team Leaders

• High Satisfaction with the Madrid Meeting Organization

Thank you

Ministry of Justice PRAP Campania