Post on 17-Jun-2020
Graphs and DNA sequencing
CS 466Saurabh Sinha
Three problems in graph theory
Eulerian Cycle Problem
• Find a cycle thatvisits every edgeexactly once
• Linear time
Hamiltonian Cycle Problem
• Find a cycle thatvisits every vertexexactly once
• NP – complete
Game invented by Sir William Hamilton in 1857
Travelling Salesman Problem• Find the cheapest tour of a given
set of cities
• “Cost” associated with going fromany city to any other city
• Must visit every city exactly once
• NP-complete
DNA Sequencing
DNA Sequencing
• Shear DNA intomillions of smallfragments
• Read 500 – 700nucleotides at a timefrom the smallfragments (Sangermethod)
Fragment Assembly
• Computational Challenge: assembleindividual short fragments (reads) into asingle genomic sequence(“superstring”)
Strategies for whole-genomesequencing
1. Hierarchical – Clone-by-clone yeast, worm, humani. Break genome into many long fragmentsii. Map each long fragment onto the genomeiii. Sequence each fragment with shotgun
2. Whole Genome Shotgun fly, human, mouse, rat, fugu
One large shotgun pass on the whole genomeUntil late 1990s the shotgun fragment assembly of human
genome was viewed as intractable problem
Shortest Superstring Problem
• Problem: Given a set of strings, find ashortest string that contains all of them
• Input: Strings s1, s2,…., sn• Output: A string s that contains all
strings s1, s2,…., sn as substrings, suchthat the length of s is minimized
• Complexity: NP – complete
Shortest Superstring Problem: Example
Shortest Superstring Problem
• Can be framed as Travelling SalesmanProblem (TSP):
• Overlap(si,sj) = largest overlap betweensi and sj
• Complete directed graph with verticesfor substrings (si) and edge weightsbeing -overlap(si,sj)
Shortest Superstring Problem
• Doesn’t help to cast this as TSP– TSP is NP-complete
• Early sequencing algorithms used agreedy approach: merge a pair ofstrings with maximum overlap first– Conjectured to have performance
guarantee of 2.
Generating the fragments
+ =
Shake
DNA fragments
VectorCircular genome
(bacterium, plasmid)
Knownlocation(restrictionsite)
Cloning (many many copies)
Different Types of Vectors
> 300,000Not used much
recently
YAC (Yeast ArtificialChromosome)
70,000 - 300,000BAC (Bacterial ArtificialChromosome)
40,000Cosmid
2,000 - 10,000Plasmid
Size of insert(bp)VECTOR
Read Coverage
Length of genomic segment: LNumber of reads: n Coverage C = n l / LLength of each read: l
How much coverage is enough?
Lander-Waterman model:Assuming uniform distribution of reads, C=10 results in 1 gappedregion per 1,000,000 nucleotides
C
Lander-Waterman Model
• Major Assumptions– Reads are randomly distributed in the genome– The number of times a base is sequenced follows
a Poisson distribution
• Implications– G= genome length, L=read length, N = # reads– Mean of Poisson: λ=LN/G (coverage)– % bases not sequenced: p(X=0) =0.0009 = 0.09%– Total gap length: p(X=0)*G
( )!
xe
p X xx
!! "
= = Average times
This model was used to plan the Human Genome Project…
Challenges in Fragment Assembly• Repeats: A major problem for fragment assembly• > 50% of human genome are repeats:
- over 1 million Alu repeats (about 300 bp)- about 200,000 LINE repeats (1000 bp and
longer)Repeat Repeat Repeat
Green and blue fragments are interchangeable when assembling repetitive DNA
Repeat-related problems inassembly
AB C
Overlap information (by comparing reads):A,B;B,C;A,C
Shortest superstring: combine A & C !
Dealing with repeats
• Approach 1: Break genome into largefragments (e.g., 150,000 bp long each),and sequence each separately.
• The number of repeats comes downproportionately (e.g., 30,000 times forhuman genome)
Dealing with repeats• Approach 2: Use “mate-pair” reads• Fragments of length ~ L are selected, and both ends
are sequenced– L >> length of typical repeat
• Reads are now in pairs, separated by approximatelyknown distance (L)
• Both reads of a mate-pair are unlikely to lie in repeatregions
• Using their approximate separation, we can resolveassembly problems
Shotgun Sequencing
cut many times atrandom (Shotgun)
genomic segment
Get one or tworeads from eachsegment
500 bp 500 bp
A completely different sequencing method:Sequencing by Hybridization
• 1988: SBH suggested as anan alternative sequencingmethod. Nobody believed it willever work
• 1991: Light directed polymersynthesis developed by SteveFodor and colleagues.
• 1994: Affymetrix develops first64-kb DNA microarray
First microarray prototype (1989)
First commercialDNA microarrayprototype w/16,000features (1994)
500,000 featuresper chip (2002)
How SBH Works• Attach all possible DNA probes of length l to a flat
surface, each probe at a distinct and known location.This set of probes is called the DNA array.
• Apply a solution containing fluorescently labeled DNAfragment to the array.
• The DNA fragment hybridizes with those probes thatare complementary to substrings of length l of thefragment.
How SBH Works (cont’d)
• Using a spectroscopic detector, determine whichprobes hybridize to the DNA fragment to obtainthe l–mer composition of the target DNAfragment.
• Apply a combinatorial algorithm to reconstructthe sequence of the target DNA fragment fromthe l – mer composition.
l-mer composition• Spectrum ( s, l ) - unordered multiset of
all possible (n – l + 1) l-mers in a string sof length n
• The order of individual elements inSpectrum ( s, l ) does not matter
The SBH Problem• Goal: Reconstruct a string from its l-mer
composition
• Input: A set S, representing all l-mers from an(unknown) string s
• Output: String s such that Spectrum(s,l ) = S
Different from the Shortest Superstring Problem
SBH: Hamiltonian Path Approach
S = { ATG AGG TGC TCC GTC GGT GCA CAG }
Path visited every VERTEX once
ATG AGG TGC TCCH GTC GGT GCA CAG
ATGCAGG TCC
SBH: Eulerian Path Approach S = { ATG, TGC, GTG, GGC, GCA, GCG, CGT }
Vertices correspond to ( l – 1 ) – mers : { AT, TG, GC, GG, GT, CA, CG }
Edges correspond to l – mers from S
AT
GT CG
CAGCTG
GG Path visited every EDGE once
Euler Theorem
• A graph is balanced if for every vertex thenumber of incoming edges equals to thenumber of outgoing edges:
in(v)=out(v)
• Theorem: A connected graph is Eulerian(has an Eulerian cycle) if and only if each ofits vertices is balanced.
Euler Theorem: Proof
• Eulerian → balanced
for every edge entering v (incoming edge)there exists an edge leaving v (outgoingedge). Therefore
in(v)=out(v)
• Balanced → Eulerian
???
Algorithm for Constructing an Eulerian Cycle
a. Start with an arbitrary vertexv and form an arbitrary cyclewith unused edges until adead end is reached. Sincethe graph is Eulerian thisdead end is necessarily thestarting point, i.e., vertex v.
Algorithm for Constructing an Eulerian Cycle(cont’d)
b. If cycle from (a) is not anEulerian cycle, it mustcontain a vertex w, whichhas untraversed edges.Perform step (a) again,using vertex w as thestarting point. Once again,we will end up in thestarting vertex w.
Algorithm for Constructing an Eulerian Cycle(cont’d)
c. Combine the cyclesfrom (a) and (b) into asingle cycle and iteratestep (b).
SBH as Eulerian Path Problem
• A vertex v is “semibalanced” if | in-degree(v) - out-degree(v)| = 1
• If a graph has an Eulerian path starting from s andending at t, then all its vertices are balanced with thepossible exception of s and t
• Add an edge between two semibalanced vertices:now all vertices should be balanced (assuming therewas an Eulerian path to begin with). Find the Euleriancycle, and remove the edge you had added. You nowhave the Eulerian path you wanted.