RYAN POBAR

GRAPHIC DESIGN 1 - 2567QCA

2 8 3 6 4 5 2

2. Ryan Pobar

My name is Ryan and I am a full time Bachelor of Digital Media student majoring in graphic design. I am

currently in my second year of the degree and I am enjoying all the challenges that arise and help me to progress in my design practices.

I enjoy graphic design as it allows me to be creative within the setting of a workplace even if it is a simulated workplace in the case of university. I feel I would crave the diversity that

a job as a graphic designer has to offer rather than mind numbingly repetitive tasks such as those on offer at my current job at KFC.

This course has helped me to hone my creative process in various ways; from brainstorming name ideas, sub-conscious writing, gathering resources as well as overall presentation and time management. I believe this aquired knowledge is evident within my portfolio, but I guess that’s up to you to decide.

ABOUT ME

STYLE GUIDE:

4. Ryan Pobar

FONTS:

Bebas Neaue

Bookman Oldstyle; Bold Italic

Helvetica Regular

Headings and display text only.

Sub-headings and display text only.

Body text only. if unavailable use: Arial or Verdana

CMYK: C0 : M31.51 : Y80.7 : K0RGB: R247 : G167 : B52

CMYK: C0 : M12.43 : Y32.46 : K0RGB: R253 : G216 : B161

CMYK: C52.18 : M0 : Y6.8 : K0RGB: R96 : G195 : B227

CMYK: C2 : M95 : Y80 : K0RGB: R219 : G20 : B45

BRIEF A:

5.

6. Ryan Pobar

7.

8. Ryan Pobar

9.

10. Ryan Pobar

11.

12. Ryan Pobar

13.

14. Ryan Pobar

15.

FUNK FITNESS FRONT DESK DESIGN

16. Ryan Pobar

17.

18. Ryan Pobar

19.

20. Ryan Pobar

21.

22. Ryan Pobar

23.

FUNK FITNESS INTERIOR MOOD BOARD

24. Ryan Pobar

BRIEF B:For the second brief we were tasked to produce a creative and innovative solution to a packaging design problem that we had identified. The packaging problem that I selected was chip packaging and the excessive air used to buffer damage and rough handling during transportation as i felt there was a large demand for a solution to this issue. My solution to this problem was “Fuller Chips” a product with a packet that has a minimal air pocket and utlizes the full net volume of the packaging.

25.

26. Ryan Pobar

27.

28. Ryan Pobar

29.

Assessment: Marks & Feedback

The following items were included in your portfolio:

Item One: Corporate Identity: weighting 50%

Criteria Criteria weighting Mark (0–10)

Creativity and Innovation 40%

Technical Standard 30%

Presentation Quality 30%

Feedback and comment

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Item Two: Packaging: weighting 50%

Criteria Criteria weighting Mark (0–10)

Creativity and Innovation 40%

Technical Standard 30%

Presentation Quality 30%

Feedback and comment

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Marking criteria

0 No Submission; 3 Poor; 4 Below Pass; 5 Pass; 6 Sound Performance; 7 Good Performance; 8 High Performance; 9 Very

High Performance; 10 Exceptional Performance

TOTAL MARK

2567QCA Graphic Design 1

Assessment: Marks & Feedback

The following items were included in your portfolio:

Item One: Corporate Identity: weighting 50%

Criteria Criteria weighting Mark (0–10)

Creativity and Innovation 40%

Technical Standard 30%

Presentation Quality 30%

Feedback and comment

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Item Two: Packaging: weighting 50%

Criteria Criteria weighting Mark (0–10)

Creativity and Innovation 40%

Technical Standard 30%

Presentation Quality 30%

Feedback and comment

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Marking criteria

0 No Submission; 3 Poor; 4 Below Pass; 5 Pass; 6 Sound Performance; 7 Good Performance; 8 High Performance; 9 Very

High Performance; 10 Exceptional Performance

TOTAL MARK

2567QCA Graphic Design 1