Post on 18-Dec-2015
Getting to know your audience: Queen’s
StudentsRoger Healey, Office of Institutional Research and
Planning
18,531
5,216
Total Queen's Enrolment (2010-11)
Full-timePart-time
72%
9%
19%
Level of Study (2010-11)
Undergrad
2nd Entry Prof
Graduate
4
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Queen's Full-Time Graduate Enrolment
51997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500Queen's Graduate Enrolment by Year (Full-Time)
Masters Doctoral
~60%
~40%
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
Queen's Undergraduate vs Graduate (Full-Time)
Undergrad Graduate
19.2%15%
Enrolment Distribution by Faculty/School
Arts and Sci
61%App Sci
17%
Business9%
Nurs-ing2%
Medicine3%
Law3%
Education5%
Undergraduate
Arts and Sci
37%
App Sci14%
Business21%
Nurs-ing1%
Medicine6%
Law1%
Edu-cation
3%
Rehab8%
PolStud/UrbPl5%
Neuro/EnvSci3%
Graduate
B.A. H
ons
B.Sc. H
ons
B.Cm
p(H)
Phys
Ed
ArtsSc
i Tot
al
App. S
ci
Comm
erce
Nursin
g
Medici
neLa
w
Educ
atio
n
MBA
Ph.D
MA/MSc
0
0.5
1Gender Split, Selected Programs (Full-time)
Female
Male
Total Number of International Students:781 Undergraduate (5.2%, from 69 countries)643 Graduate (17.7%, from 73 countries)
Countries with the highest representation:Undergrad: China, U.S., South Korea, UK, PakistanGraduate: U.S., China, India, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Germany
International Students
• 3,825 Undergraduates in “Class of 2014”
• Every Canadian province and territory represented
• Overall admission average of 87.9%
Incoming Undergraduate Class
• Measure 4 equity-seeking groups: Females, aboriginals, persons with a disability and racialized groups (visible minority)
• also ask about Gross Family Income, Parental Education Level, Rural/Urban
Applicant Equity Census
NSSE National Survey of Student EngagementBenchmarks of Effective Educational Practice
• High engagement linked to positive educational outcomes
• Methodology is robust and widely used
• Engagement scores help to monitor strengths and weaknesses
• Uses 42 key questions and surveys 1st year and 4th year
• We now have very detailed data that allows comparisons at unit level (e.g. Electrical Engineering) across over 40 universities in Canada
Why NSSE?
• LAC – Level of Academic Challenge (+)
• ACL – Active and Collaborative Learning (-)
• SFI – Student-Faculty Interaction (-)
• EEE – Enriching Educational Experiences (+)
• SCE – Supportive Campus Environment (+)
NSSE Benchmarks
• www.queensu.ca/irp
• 613-533-2100
• contact us for more information
Office of Institutional Research and Planning