Post on 23-May-2018
Functional Behavior Assessment
Denise Duke, Ed. S.
Behavior Specialist
Houston County Board of
Education
What will we cover today?
• Why do we do Functional Behavior
Assessments (FBA)?
• What does IDEA-2004 say about conducting an
FBA?
• What does ABC stand for in relation to an FBA?
• How do you operationally define a target
behavior that is observable and measureable?
• What are the environmental variables that
influence and maintain behavior?
Functional Behavior Assessment Definition• Functional behavior assessment (FBA) is a
process rooted in the science of applied
behavior analysis (ABA), which focuses on the
relationship between behavior and
environmental variables. (Autism Internet
Module)
• It has 3 basic components:
Indirect assessment (rating scales, interviews,
records review)
Descriptive assessment (direct observation, data
collection)
Functional analysis (experimental manipulation
of environmental variables to determine the
function of a problem behavior)
What does IDEA require regarding an FBA?
• An FBA must be conducted:
There is a child with a disability
• Who has been removed from school for 10 days
• For behavior that interferes with the learning
environment
• For misconduct that either
– Is a manifestation of his/her disability
– Is not a manifestation of his/her disability
– Involves weapons or drugs, or serious bodily injury
Who is responsible for participating in an FBA?
The IDEA is not specific regarding who must
participate in the FBA process.
State and local education agencies have the
discretion to determine who conducts or
participates in the process.
When should an FBA be conducted?
As proactively as
possible!!!
The ABC’s of an FBA
• Antecedent – environmental events or
conditions that occur just prior the behavior of
interest. This includes setting events.
• Behavior – The action of interest, commonly
referred to as the target behavior (bx).
• Consequence – The environmental event or
condition that occurs just after the target
behavior that maintains or increases the
occurrence of the target behavior.
The 3-Term Contingency
BEHAVIOR!
First things first…
Overview
Michael’s Story
Understanding Behavior
Those unfamiliar with the science of behavior
often offer explanations of behavior that are not
helpful for finding a solution.
These explanations are often referred to as
“circular reasoning.”
“He won’t sit because he has ADHD.”
“How do you know he has ADHD?”
“I know because he won’t sit!”
Circular Reasoning
Examples of Very SpecificOperational Definitions of Behavior• Propel an object with force through the air by
movement of hand/arm
• Using an open or closed hand to strike or attempt to
strike the body part and/or clothing of another
person/self
• Projecting matter from mouth (1 inch from body)
• Forcefully gripping skin between finger(s) and/or
thumb (including with enough force to leave a visible
mark)
• Collapsing body from a standing or seated position
to lying on the ground in an uncontrolled manner
that is not within context of the ongoing activity
Operational Definition of the Problem Behavior
Consequences
• What do YOU think of when you hear the word
CONSEQUENCES?
• How does it differ from the way it applies to the
3-term Contingency?
• That’s why I prefer the term CONSEQUENT
EVENT.
REINFORCERSConsequent events that
increase the probability that the behavior they follow will
happen again.
PUNISHERSConsequent events that decrease the probability that the behavior they
follow will happen again.
PositiveAn event, object, or
condition is ADDED!
NegativeAn event, object, or
condition is REMOVED!
PositiveAn event, object, or
condition is ADDED!
NegativeAn event, object, or
condition is REMOVED!
Candy, attention,
computer time
Aspirin for a headache,
Leaving a crowded room.
Spanking Time out
Functions of Problem Behavior
• Socially mediated positive reinforcement
– Access to tangibles or attention from
peers/adults
• Socially mediated negative
reinforcement – Escape from
aversive/non-preferred activities
• Automatic reinforcement in the form of
sensory feedback (stereotypical
behaviors)
Antecedent Events
Discriminative Stimulus (SD) – A signal that reinforcement is available.
Motivation Operation (MO) – Two types
Establishing Operation (EO) – Increases
the value of a reinforcer.
Abolishing Operation (AO) – Decreases
the value of a reinforcer.
Setting Events – This refers to events that occur before, but not immediately, the behavior of interest. These events can influence behaviors, but are difficult be discovered in the FBA process.
Screening
Make sure there isn’t a physical issue
contributing to the problem behavior.
Make sure that there’s an actual need
for an FBA and that there’s not a
simple explanation.
Functional Behavior Assessment
• The ultimate goal of an FBA is
to find a functionally equivalent
replacement behavior with an
emphasis on reinforcement
rather than punishment.
Big FBA and little fba
• little fba – observing and adjusting
• BIG FBA
Is this behavior dangerous to the student?
Is this behavior dangerous to others?
Does this behavior interfere with the student’s
learning or the learning of others?
Does this behavior interfere with socialization?
Is the behavior frequent and disruptive?
Indirect Assessment
• FAST
• MAS
• Interview
DATA Collection and Direct Observation
• Momentary Time Sampling
• Duration
• Frequency
• A-B-C recording
FREQUENCY CHART
Date: TARGET BEHAVIOR:
STUDENT:
Observer: 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00
7:31 8:01 8:31 9:01 9:31 10:01 10:31 11:01 11:31 12:01 12:31 1:01 1:31 2:01 2:31 3:01
7:32 8:02 8:32 9:02 9:32 10:02 10:32 11:02 11:32 12:02 12:32 1:02 1:32 2:02 2:32 3:02
7:33 8:03 8:33 9:03 9:33 10:03 10:33 11:03 11:33 12:03 12:33 1:03 1:33 2:03 2:33 3:03
7:34 8:04 8:34 9:04 9:34 10:04 10:34 11:04 11:34 12:04 12:34 1:04 1:34 2:04 2:34 3:04
7:35 8:05 8:35 9:05 9:35 10:05 10:35 11:05 11:35 12:05 12:35 1:05 1:35 2:05 2:35 3:05
7:36 8:06 8:36 9:06 9:36 10:06 10:36 11:06 11:36 12:06 12:36 1:06 1:36 2:06 2:36 3:06
7:37 8:07 8:37 9:07 9:37 10:07 10:37 11:07 11:37 12:07 12:37 1:07 1:37 2:07 2:37 3:07
7:38 8:08 8:38 9:08 9:38 10:08 10:38 11:08 11:38 12:08 12:38 1:08 1:38 2:08 2:38 3:08
7:39 8:09 8:39 9:09 9:39 10:09 10:39 11:09 11:39 12:09 12:39 1:09 1:39 2:09 2:39 3:09
7:40 8:10 8:40 9:10 9:40 10:10 10:40 11:10 11:40 12:10 12:40 1:10 1:40 2:10 2:40 3:10
7:41 8:11 8:41 9:11 9:41 10:11 10:41 11:11 11:41 12:11 12:41 1:11 1:41 2:11 2:41 3:11
7:42 8:12 8:42 9:12 9:42 10:12 10:42 11:12 11:42 12:12 12:42 1:12 1:42 2:12 2:42 3:12
7:43 8:13 8:43 9:13 9:43 10:13 10:43 11:13 11:43 12:13 12:43 1:13 1:43 2:13 2:43 3:13
7:44 8:14 8:44 9:14 9:44 10:14 10:44 11:14 11:44 12:14 12:44 1:14 1:44 2:14 2:44 3:14
7:45 8:15 8:45 9:15 9:45 10:15 10:45 11:15 11:45 12:15 12:45 1:15 1:45 2:15 2:45 3:15
7:46 8:16 8:46 9:16 9:46 10:16 10:46 11:16 11:46 12:16 12:46 1:16 1:46 2:16 2:46 3:16
7:47 8:17 8:47 9:17 9:47 10:17 10:47 11:17 11:47 12:17 12:47 1:17 1:47 2:17 2:47 3:17
7:48 8:18 8:48 9:18 9:48 10:18 10:48 11:18 11:48 12:18 12:48 1:18 1:48 2:18 2:48 3:18
7:49 8:19 8:49 9:19 9:49 10:19 10:49 11:19 11:49 12:19 12:49 1:19 1:49 2:19 2:49 3:19
7:50 8:20 8:50 9:20 9:50 10:20 10:50 11:20 11:50 12:20 12:50 1:20 1:50 2:20 2:50 3:20
7:51 8:21 8:51 9:21 9:51 10:21 10:51 11:21 11:51 12:21 12:51 1:21 1:51 2:21 2:51 3:21
7:52 8:22 8:52 9:22 9:52 10:22 10:52 11:22 11:52 12:22 12:52 1:22 1:52 2:22 2:52 3:22
7:53 8:23 8:53 9:23 9:53 10:23 10:53 11:23 11:53 12:23 12:53 1:23 1:53 2:23 2:53 3:23
7:54 8:24 8:54 9:24 9:54 10:24 10:54 11:24 11:54 12:24 12:54 1:24 1:54 2:24 2:54 3:24
7:55 8:25 8:55 9:25 9:55 10:25 10:55 11:25 11:55 12:25 12:55 1:25 1:55 2:25 2:55 3:25
7:56 8:26 8:56 9:26 9:56 10:26 10:56 11:26 11:56 12:26 12:56 1:26 1:56 2:26 2:56 3:26
7:57 8:27 8:57 9:27 9:57 10:27 10:57 11:27 11:57 12:27 12:57 1:27 1:57 2:27 2:57 3:27
7:58 8:28 8:58 9:28 9:58 10:28 10:58 11:28 11:58 12:28 12:58 1:28 1:58 2:28 2:58 3:28
7:59 8:29 8:59 9:29 9:59 10:29 10:59 11:29 11:59 12:29 12:59 1:29 1:59 2:29 2:59 3:29
Behavior Intervention Team ABC Data Form
Student:________________________ ________ Teacher:_____________________________ Date: - -_____
Time
Begin-End
Target Behaviors Place Where it occurred
Context/Activity Antecedent Exactly what happened
right before the behavior
Consequence What happened right
after the behavior
Student Reaction
Key for A-B-C Sheet
Target BX Place Context/Activity Antecedent Consequence Student
Reaction
A. Biting
B. Hitting
C. Throwing
things
Functional Analysis
• THE GOLD STANDARD
BUT ONLY FOR A TRAINED PRACTITIONER
IN A CLINICAL SETTING!!!!
References
Pennington, R. & Szakacs, W. (2014). Understanding behavior through functional behavior
assessment: Online training module. In Ohio Center for Autism and Low Incidence (OCALI), Autism
Internet Modules, www.autisminternetmodules.org. Columbus, OH: OCALI.
Anderson C. M., & St. Peter, C. C. (2013). Functional analysis with typically developing children: Best
practice or too early to tell? In response to Hanley (2012). Behavior Analysis in Practice, 62-73.
Barton-Arwood, S. M., Wehby, J. H., Gunter, P. L., & Lane, K. L. (2003). Functional Behavior
Assessment Rating Scales: Interrater Reliability with Students with Emotional or Behavioral
Disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 386-400.
Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional
analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1-21.
Chok, J. T., Shlesinger, A., Studer, L., & Bird, F. L. (2012). Description of a practitioner training
program on functional analysis and treatment development. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 25.
Durand, V. M. & Crimmons, D. B. (1988). Identifying variables maintaining self-injurious behavior.
Journal of Autism and Development Disabilities, 18, 99-117.
Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A
descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment.
School Psychology Review, 30, 193-211.
Fisher, W. W., Ninness, H. A., Piazza, C. C., & Owen‐DeSchryver, J. S. (1996). On the reinforcing
effects of the content of verbal attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 235-238.
Fritz, J. N., Iwata, B. A., Hammond, J. L., & Bloom, S. E. (2013). Experimental analysis of precursors
to severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 101-129.
References
Greer, B. D., Neidert, P. L., Dozier, C. L., Payne, S. W., Zonneveld, K. L., & Harper, A. M. (2013).
Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior in early education classrooms. Journal of
Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 289-295.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A
review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147-185.
Heward, W. L. (2005). Reasons applied behavior analysis is good for education and why those
reasons have been insufficient. In W.L. Heward et al. (Eds.) Focus on Behavior Analysis in
Education: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Iwata, B. A., DeLeon, I. G., & Roscoe, E. M. (2013). Reliability and validity of the functional analysis
screening tool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 271-284
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a
functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20.
Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2008). Clinical application of functional analysis methodology. Behavior
Analysis in Practice, 1, 3.
Kantor, J. R. (1957). Events and constructs in the science of psychology: Philosophy- Banished and
recalled. The Psychological Record, 7, 55-60.
Lewis, T., Scott, T. M., Sugai, G. (1994). The problem behavior questionnaire: A teacher-based
instrument to develop functional hypotheses of problem behavior in general education classrooms.
Assessment for Effective Intervention, 19, 103-115.
Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). The questions about behavioral function (QABF): User's
guide. Baton Rouge, LA: Disability Consultants LLc.
References
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155.
Morris, R. R. (1985). Behavior modification with exceptional children: Principles and practices.
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Neef, N., & Peterson, S. (2007). Functional behavior assessment. In J. O. Cooper, T. E., Heron, & W.
L. Heward (Eds.) Applied Behavior Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
O'Neill, R. E. Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997).
Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook.
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Contrucci, S. A., Delia, M. D., Adelinis, J. D., & Goh, H. L. (1999). An
evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32,, 437-449.
Roscoe, E. M., Iwata, B. A., & Zhou, L. (2013). Assessment and treatment of chronic hand mouthing.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 181-198.
Solnick, M. D., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). A quantitative review of functional analysis procedures in
public school settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 153-175.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington J. W. (2013). Teaching language to children with autism or other
developmental disabilities. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Umbreit, J., Ferro, J., Liaupsin, C. J., & Lane, K. L. (2007). Functional behavior assessment and
function based intervention: An effective and practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
References
Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I.
(1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 111-114.
Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Ringdahl, J. E. (1995). Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-
injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcemen Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 15-
26.
Wacker, D. P., Lee, J. F., Dalmau, Y. C. P., Kopelman, T. G., Lindgren, S. D., Kuhle, J., ... &
Waldron, D. B. (2013). Conducting functional communication training via telehealth to reduce the
problem behavior of young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,
25,, 35-48.
Zarcone, J. R., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1991). Reliability
analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: A failure to replicate. Research in Developmental
https://quizlet.com/12464847/operational-definitions-flash-cards/