Fort River Elementary SchoolFeasibility Study

June 15, 2018

Introduction | Why TSKP!

Senior Leadership Involvement Throughout

“They Listen.”

“You Can Trust Them.”

“They Know What They Are Doing.”

2

40 years Ryszard Szczypek, AIA Project Director TSKP STUDIO

30 years Randall Luther, AIA, MCPPO Design Director TSKP STUDIO

15+ years Jesse Saylor, AIA, LEED BD+C, MCPPO Project Manager TSKP STUDIO

30 years Craig Razza, PE M / E / P / FP Kohler Ronan

30 years Chris Schaffner, PE, LEED Fellow Green Design The Green Engineer

Introduction | Project Leadership

3

Introduction | Get to Know Us…

4

Project Understanding | Agenda

1 Design Quality

2 Community Engagement and Support

3 Program Refinement - 21st Century Learning

4 Range of Options - New vs. Additions & Renovation

5 Phasing, Occupancy + Benchmarking

6 Green Design (Sustainability, LEED + Net Zero)

7 Design Options for Fort River ES

8 Quality Control

5

1 Design Quality | Fresh Design

6

1 Design Quality | Responsive to Context

7

1 Design Quality | Simple… Child Friendly

8

1 Design Quality | Age Appropriate Scale

9

10

1 Design Quality | Natural Light… Welcoming

11

1 Design Quality | Multi-functioning Space

1 Design Quality | Beautiful and Durable

12

1 Design Quality | Connections to the Outdoors

13

1 Design Quality | Appropriate Storage and Furnishings

14

1 Design Quality | Security + Safety

15

16

2 Community Engagement | Public Workshops

Program

Budget

Design Options

LEED / Net Zero

Phasing

17

2 Community Engagement | Consensus Building

2 Community Engagement | Public Communications

18

Rain Garden

3 Program Refinement | Program Drives Design

19

3 Program Refinement | Learning Modalities

20

3 Program Refinement | Learning Modalities

21

3 Program Refinement | Breakout Areas

22

3 Program Refinement | A Variety of Spaces

23

3 Program Refinement | Multi-Use Corridors

24

3 Program Refinement | Outdoor Spaces

25

3 Program Refinement | Movable Furniture

26

3 Program Refinement | Square Footage Confirmation

27

4 Range of Options | New vs. Additions & Renovation

Coburn School, West Springfield

28

5 Phasing + Occupancy | New Construction

29

5 Phasing + Occupancy | New Construction

LEED Gold

30

5 Phasing + Occupancy | Additions and Renovation

31

5 Phasing + Occupancy | Additions and Renovation

32

Cheney-Bennet Academy, Manchester

Verplanck Elementary School, Manchester

Waddell Elementary School, Manchester

Cider Mill School, Wilton

Alfred E. Burr School, Hartford

R. Dudley Seymour Elementary School, East Granby

Winthrop STEM Magnet, New London

Hale Visual and Performing Arts Magnet, New London

5 Phasing + Occupancy | Extensive Experience

33

5 Benchmarking | New vs. Additions & Renovation

34

Greenwich61,595 SF

Wilton127,100 SF

MSBASF VARIES

Year of Completion 2018anticipated

2017 2017

Demo & Site Constr. Cost

Building Construction Cost

7,482,611

22,966,239

6,334,000

32,273,000

New Building Cost Only 373/SF 322/SF 281-375/SF

Renovation Cost Only 244/SF

Escalation Factor(at 4% per year to 2021 construction start)

4 years

1.165 years

1.215 years

1.21

New Building Cost in 2021 420/SF 389/SF 340-454/SF

Renovation Cost in 2021 - 295/SF

Engaging the Children

6 Green Design | Sustainability Goals

Rogers IB Environmental Magnet School

• Green Ribbon School (2014)

• CT Green Building Council Award (2010)

• Boston Society of Architects, Sustainable Design Award (2011)

LEED Silver Certified (1st CT Public School)

35

Engaging the Children

6 Green Design | Environmental Education

36

Engaging the Children

6 Green Design | Environmental Education

37

6 Green Design | Energy CodeASHRAE 90.1-2013 | IECC 2015

38

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Energ

y U

se

In

de

x (

0-1

00

)

20012004

2007

2010

2013

CT, RI CURRENT

MA, VT, NY CURRENT

NH CURRENT

6 Green Design | What Do We Mean by Net Zero

39

6 Green Design | Net Zero – Worcester, MA

40

Nelson Place School

LEED v4 Gold

Targeting “Net Zero

Electricity”

6 Green Design | Net Zero - Lexington, MA

41

Hastings School

Will be one of the 1st

MA Public Schools to

achieve Net Zero

KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER

Project Overview

Location Wallingford, Connecticut

Client Choate Rosemary Hall

Architect Robert A.M. Stern

Completion 2012

Program Area 32,500 ft2

Performance Metrics

Energy Use Intensity 28 kBTU/ft2

Savings Over Code 55%

Onsite Energy Production 349,400 kWh

Project Highlights

Net Zero Energy Building [ Source Energy ]

LEED Platinum Certified

2014 AIA COTE Award

2016 BSA Award

Pursuing LBC

6 Green Design | Living Building Challenge

42

6 Green Design | Energy vs Cost

43

6 Green Design | Net Zero - Williamstown, MA

44

Existing Roof: 82,000 sf

20 kbtu/sf/yr = 480 kw

30 kbtu/sf/yr = 720 kw

40 kbtu/sf/yr = 960 kw(50,000 SF Array)

6 Green Design | Test-Fit for Fort River School

45

6 Green Design | Existing Conditions Considerations

46

6 Green Design | Existing Conditions Considerations

47

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

48

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

49

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

50

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

51

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

52

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

53

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

54

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

55

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

56

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

57

7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno

58

Pre-construction

• Programming – the right decisions made in the

beginning saves money in the end.

• Cost Reconciliation – Evaluating alternative systems &

materials.

• Diligent documentation of existing conditions (laser

scanning).

• Best approach for the client and the overall success of

the project.

Hands on senior level team members committed

to the project - from beginning to end.

Construction Administration

• Responsiveness: Knowledge of the project

• Maintaining design intent and construction quality

8 Quality Control | Commitment of Senior Personnel

59

Construction

Cost

Change

Orders

Victoria Soto / Honeyspot Academy

Town of Stratford“This cheerfully colored, bright school …evokes a

sense of joy and kindness…You walk in and you

are just happy.

Carlos Soto, Victoria Soto’s brother

$15,627,000 A/E = 0.18%

Nathan Hale Arts Magnet +

Winthrop Science / Tech Magnet

City of New London

“…our district highly recommends the design

team of TSKP STUDIO... Their attention to detail

and taking our students and community’s needs

into consideration for building development only

helped to create the successful outcome .”

Christine Carver, Assistant Superintendent

New London Public Schools

$39,860,558 A/E = 0.57%

Rogers International Environmental

Magnet School

City of Stamford

“Noted for high achievement in three areas: 1)

Reduced environmental impact and cost; 2)

Improved Health and Wellness; and 3) Effective

environmental Education.

DOE Green Ribbon Award, 2015

$37,010,000 2.0%

Guilford High School

Town of Guilford“Guilford’s new state-of-the-art high school

provides a superior learning environment, an

energy efficient environment, and a more secure

environment.First Selectman Joe Mazza

$78,200,000 A/E = 0.90%

Bristow Middle School

Town of West HartfordAwarded Impact on Learning Award,

Council of Educational Facility Planners Institute

$18,518,000 1.3 %

8 Quality Control | Past Performance

60

Engaging the Children

Why TSKP | Engaging the Children

61

Seymour School – Career Day

Why TSKP | Why we do this work!

62

Why TSKP | Conclusion

“They Listen.”

“You Can Trust Them.”

“They Know What They Are Doing.”

63

Fort River Elementary SchoolQ & A

65

66

Resource Slides Follow

67

Project Approach | ScheduleCutler School + West Side School

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Early Services

Architect Selection

NEW BUILDING PROJECT

Phase 1 - Building Project

Design Phases

Bid Package

Construction/Move In

Demo/Site

RENOVATE-AS-NEW PROJECT

Phase 1 - Demo/Abatement

Design Phases - Demo/Abatement

Bid - Demo/Abatement

Construction - Demo/Abatement

Phase 2 - Building

Design Phases - Building

Bid - Building

Construction - Building

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

SD

SD

2018 2019

BID

CD

BID

DESIGN PHASE (14 MONTHS)

CDDD

Phase 1

2018 2019 2020 2021

2020 2021

DEMO/SITE

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (17 MONTHS)

PHASED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (24 MONTHS)

CD

BID

DD

DESIGN PHASE 2 (15 MONTHS)

Substantial Completion

OSCGR Review

Analyze All the Possibilities

Maximize Opportunities with the Project Budget

Design in the Best Interest of the Students

68

Design Opportunity | Design Goals

Design Opportunity | LMC

37

Design Opportunity | Gymnasium

47

Engaging the Children

71

Greene Hills School

Sand Elementary

Sand Elementary

Design Opportunity | Active Play vs. Quiet Learning

Engaging the Children

72

Design Opportunity | Cafeteria

Greene Hills School

73

Bloomfield HS

Design Opportunity | LMC

Engaging the Children

74

McKinley Elementary

Design Opportunity | Multi-Use

75

Workload | CapacityEst

Const. TSKP

Cost Leaders

Projects in Design:

Woodrow Wilson Middle School – Middletown, CT $ 74 M RS / RSL SD SD DD CD CD Bid CA CA CA CA CA

New School

Winterhill Community Innovation School – Somerville, MA $ 3.1 M RSL / YK Bid CA CA

Windows & Door Replacement

Quaboag Regional School District – Warren, MA $ 0.8 M RSL / YK Bid CA CA

Roof Replacement, Windows & Doors

Hartford Public Library - Park Branch $ 8.5 M TWI / DL CD Bid CA CA CA CA

12,500 sf New Construction

Coburn Elem School - West Springfield, MA $ 55 M RS / JS St. St. SD SD SD

Feasibility Study+New School

Projects in Construction:

Verplanck Elem School - Town of Manchester $ 26.4 M RSL / JAB Bid CA CA CA CA CA CA CA

18,080 sf New/ 52,000 sf Renovation

Higgins Hall - Western CT State Univ $22 M TWI / CO Bid CA CA CA CA CA CA CA

3,000 sf New/ 85,000 sf Renovation

Farmhouse Educational Center - Stamford Museum +

Nature Center

$ 5 M TWI / JS CA CA CA CA

10,000 sf New/ 3,000 sf Renovation

Willard + DiLoreto Halls - Central Ct State Univ $42.4 M TWI / MS CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA

35,000 sf New/ 105,000 sf Renovation

Waddell Elem School - Town of Manchester $ 27.3 M RSL / JB CA CA CA CA

18,000 sf New/ 66,000 sf Renovation

New Lebanon Elem. School - Greenwich $ 35 M RS/JS/CO CA CA CA CA CA

58,000 sf New Construction

Project Phase Key TSKP Leaders Key

Study St. Ryszard Szczypek RS

Schematic Design SD Whit Iglehart TWI

Design Development DD Randall Luther RSL

Construction Documents CD Christine O'Hare CO

CT-SDE-Office of School Construction Grants & Review OSC Jeffrey A Brown JAB

Bidding Bid Joon Baek JB

Construction Administration CA Mehmet Sahin MS

Jesse Saylor JS

Diana Lanser DL

Yugon Kim YK

20202018 2019

Project Approach | Laser Scanning

95

77

• Maximize safety – It’s a school first, construction site is secondary

• Minimize disruption of any learning spaces

• Maximize constructability

– Appropriate zoning of existing systems

– Maintain operation of life safety systems

– Partial Balancing

– Extended Warranty

– System Flush

Project Approach | Occupied Phasing

Benchmarking

Greenwich61,595 SF

Wilton127,100 SF

Manchester72,000 SF

Year of Completion 2018anticipated

2017 2019anticipated

Demo & Site Constr. Cost

Building Construction Cost

7,482,611

22,966,239

6,334,000

32,273,000

2,710,000

20,589,055

New Building Cost Only 373/SF 322/SF 380/SF

Renovation Cost Only 244/SF 250/SF

Escalation Factor(at 4% per year to 2020 construction start)

3 years

1.124 years

1.172 years

1.08

New Building Cost in 2020 404/SF 377/SF 410/SF

Renovation Cost in 2020 - 285/SF 270/SF

Cutler + West SideNew Building Cost in 2020

400/SF

Renovation Cost in 2020 285/SF

78

Controlling the Budget with Alternates

79

SD Estimate

Oct 16, 2007

Reconciled

SD Estimate

Oct 30, 2007

Furniture

Update

Dec 12, 2007

Contract

as of

Jan 14 2009Original

Budget

Construction Cost

3,632,118 4,379,071 3,598,084 3,698,084 4,023,030 3,693,966 3,577,552

4,691,749 5,415,571 4,689,984 4,691,749 5,026,180 4,691,749 4,691,749

5 Total Construction

Other Costs

DD Estimate

Dec 30, 2007

CD Estimate

Feb 04, 2008

Alternates

17 TOTAL PROJECT COST

79

What our clients say about us…..

80

“…easy to work with…no red flags or even yellow flags.”

“…projects came in on time and within budget.”

“…expertise working with the state.”

“…creativity with emphasis on learning.”

“…open to suggestion…willing to listen”

“…excellent and comprehensive construction documents.”

“…their design attracted people to the school.”

– References obtained by the Greenwich New Lebanon School Building Committee

Introduction| Project Leadership

81

RYSZARD SZCZYPEK

Project Director

Budget Allocation

Edu. Program

Primary Contact

RANDALL LUTHER

Design Director

Design

Docs Review

Quality Control

JESSE SAYLOR

Project Manager

Team Management

Construction Docs

Constr. Progress

MANAGEMENTDESIGN

QUALITY CONTROL

82

LEED & Net Zero | Renovation Issues

Design Quality | Details that Inspire

83

Design Quality | Provide Storage in Classrooms

84

Design Quality | Technology and Transparency

85

Grade Appropriate Furnishings + Equipment

86

KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER Choate Rosemary Hall

Wallingford, Connecticut

Green Design | Net Zero

Green Design | Net Zero

PASSIVE STRATEGIES• Optimized orientation

• High performance envelope

• Earth duct cooling & natural ventilation

• Daylight and rainwater harvesting

• Relaxed interior temperature

requirements

ACTIVE SYSTEMS• Geothermal heat pumps

• Energy recovery

• Demand control ventilation

• Radiant flooring

• Low flow fixtures

• Energy efficient lighting

• Energy monitoring

ONSITE GENERATION• Photovoltaic electrical generation

• Solar hot water heating

Green Design | Net Zero

Typical Approach: Traditional construction methods = larger, and larger photovoltaic arrays…

Typical Results:NZEB’s range widely in energy use intensity…

94 kbtu/ft2/yr. [ ≈1 PV panel required per 12 ft2 of program area ]

For reference, a typical PV panel is roughly 18ft2

Green Design | Net Zero

Holistic Approach: Integrated Design Process…

Holistic Results:

40 kbtu/ft2/yr. [ ≈1 PV panel required per 29 ft2 of program area ]

TESTDEFINE IDEATE PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENT

Green Design | Net Zero

Establish energy budget & design targets

Manage Energy Budget vs Cost Budget

Minimize peak building loads

Incorporate passive design strategies

Recover waste energy

Integrate active systems

Optimize renewable energy production

Green Design | Net Zero Approach

Green Design | Approach

Net Zero History

KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER

Confirmed

28 kbtu/sf/yr

Projected

29 kbtu/sf/yr

WILLIAMS COLLEGE

Green Design | Net Zero Approach

6 Green Design | Net Zero

96