Post on 27-Oct-2014
Particle SizeLab Result True value Bias
7 91.13 92.1 -0.975 91.43 92.1 -0.673 91.73 92.1 -0.37
10 91.73 92.1 -0.378 91.77 92.1 -0.332 92.17 92.1 0.079 92.17 92.1 0.07
11 92.25 92.1 0.1513 92.27 92.1 0.17
1 92.33 92.1 0.234 92.33 92.1 0.236 92.4 92.1 0.30
14 92.47 92.1 0.3712 92.67 92.1 0.5715 92.7 92.1 0.60
average 92.1033stdev 0.45128 RMS 0.43598RSD 0.5% %RMS 0.5%Uncertainty (k=2) 1.0% U 0.9%0.11651964
BitumenLab
5 6 6.16333333333333 -0.163333338 6.02 6.16333333333333 -0.143333336 6.09 6.16333333333333 -0.073333332 6.12 6.16333333333333 -0.04333333
15 6.12 6.16333333333333 -0.043333334 6.13 6.16333333333333 -0.03333333
11 6.14 6.16333333333333 -0.023333339 6.16 6.16333333333333 -0.00333333
10 6.16 6.16333333333333 -0.003333337 6.17 6.16333333333333 0.006666667
13 6.22 6.16333333333333 0.05666666712 6.25 6.16333333333333 0.086666667
1 6.27 6.16333333333333 0.1066666673 6.27 6.16333333333333 0.106666667
7 5 3 10 8 2 9 11 13 1 4 6 14 12 1590
91
92
93
94
Ringtest OCW - Particle Size Distribution Sieving Method FME 54.07 0,063 mm
Labnr.
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Re
st
(%)
Assigned Value
5 8 6 2 15 4 11 9 10 7 13 12 1 3 145.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6Ringtest OCW % Bitumen FME 54.07
Labnr
Bit
um
en (
%)
14 6.33 6.16333333333333 0.166666667average 6.16333333stdev 0.09232448 0.089193921RSD 1.5% 1.4%% Uncertainty (k=2) 3.0% 2.9%Uncertainty (k=2) 0.18464896 0.178387842
5 8 6 2 15 4 11 9 10 7 13 12 1 3 145.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6Ringtest OCW % Bitumen FME 54.07
Labnr
Bit
um
en (
%)
7 5 3 10 8 2 9 11 13 1 4 6 14 12 1590
91
92
93
94
Ringtest OCW - Particle Size Distribution Sieving Method FME 54.07 0,063 mm
Labnr.
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Re
st
(%)
Assigned Value
5 8 6 2 15 4 11 9 10 7 13 12 1 3 145.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6Ringtest OCW % Bitumen FME 54.07
Labnr
Bit
um
en (
%)
5 8 6 2 15 4 11 9 10 7 13 12 1 3 145.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6Ringtest OCW % Bitumen FME 54.07
Labnr
Bit
um
en (
%)
PersonA PersonB
Test 1 29.89 30.02Test 2 29.93 29.99Test 3 29.72 30.11Test 4 29.98 29.97Test 5 30.02 30.01Test 6 29.98 29.99Test 7 29.80 30.00Test 8 29.95 29.98Test 9 29.97 30.04
Test 10 29.91 30.07
ID Pipet MICROPIP 32Volume pipet: 100-1000 µl
Date 4/7/2023
z (µl/mg) = 1.0027 ml/g Correction factor for T and pressure
Weighings
Measurements (mg) Nominal 50% Smallest
1000 µL 500 µL 100 µL1 987.7 498.7 99.22 992.0 498.4 99.13 993.3 496.3 99.74 991.1 496.2 99.05 986.3 497.1 100.16 987.4 496.3 99.67 991.2 496.6 100.08 991.1 495.3 99.99 989.0 496.3 98.3
10 989.8 497.1 99.5
a
Our result
Result (ng/mL) ue (ng/mL)Aluminium 110.3 5.6Arsenic 67.2 3.4Zinc 81.3 3.8
Values 82.5 82.5 81.7 81.0 80.8 80.6 78.4Sorted 78.4 80.6 80.8 81.0 81.7 82.5 82.5Min 78.4Max 86.8Range 8.4Qexp 0.5 0.3n=8
86.886.8
Validation Spreadsheet
issued on: 12/03/2007revised on: 13/04/2008
Analytical Services Lab FM-0243Page 5/11
sCRM: ERM-BD 273 Toasted Bread mg/l
m CRM 425 ng/g µg/lU CRM: 29 ng/g ng/l
Number Date (dd-mm-yy) Results %1 04-Jun-06 427 °C2 04-Jun-06 413 °3 04-Jun-06 4474 04-Jun-06 4275 04-Jun-06 4496 04-Jun-06 4097 04-Jun-06 4518 04-Jun-06 4239 04-Jun-06 439
10 04-Jun-06 442
Validation Spreadsheet
issued on: 12/03/2007revised on: 13/04/2008
Analytical Services Lab FM-0243Page 5/11
Number Date (dd-mm-yy) Results1 11-Jun-06 4022 18-Jun-06 4183 25-Jun-06 4444 02-Jul-06 4555 09-Jul-06 4136 16-Jul-06 4447 23-Jul-06 4608 30-Jul-06 4219 06-Aug-06 450
10 13-Aug-06 40811 20-Aug-06 43912 27-Aug-06 45513 03-Sep-06 416
Validation Spreadsheet
issued on: 12/03/2007revised on: 13/04/2008
Analytical Services Lab FM-0243Page 3/11
Number1 0.38802 0.43803 0.32704 0.31305 0.39506 0.40407 0.38508 0.39309 0.3420
10 0.4120
Clow (ng/g)
QC,0 Recovery QC,0 Recovery QC,0 Recovery QC,11 92 11 98 21 95 312 92 12 98 22 97 323 95 13 97 23 98 334 94 14 89 24 92 345 98 15 93 25 92 356 99 16 94 26 93 367 98 17 94 27 97 378 94 18 89 28 97 389 95 19 95 29 99 39
10 92 20 98 30 98 40
Recovery QC,1 Recovery QC,1 Recovery97 41 97 51 9894 42 96 52 9792 43 97 53 8894 44 99 54 9392 45 97 55 9497 46 98 56 9996 47 92 57 9895 48 98 58 9598 49 99 59 10095 50 98 60 100
Determination of moisture content EEC 71/393 in feed stuffUncertainty by participation in intercomparisons
Year Unit Youden Ref Lab2003 % 6.6 6.6 6.8 0.2202003 % 5.3 5.3 5.6 0.1242003 % 5.5 5.5 5.3 0.1472003 % 7.0 7.0 7.1 0.2332003 % 6.3 6.3 6.1 0.1472003 % 12.8 12.8 12.6 0.4692003 % 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.0472003 % 5.4 5.4 5.5 0.1262004 % 17.9 17.9 17.6 0.4762004 % 6.0 6.0 5.8 0.1992004 % 7.1 7.1 7.4 0.1662004 % 6.0 6.0 5.8 0.220
% 0.7 0.70 0.67 0.019% 0.7 0.70 0.72 0.023% 0.7 0.70 0.68 0.021% 0.7 0.70 0.67 0.016
sPT (predef)
Determination of moisture content EEC 71/393 in feed stuffUncertainty by participation in intercomparisons
u, lab (k=1) u, ref (k=1) % Bias z0.143 0.093 3.0% 0.90.116 0.075 5.7% 2.40.111 0.078 -3.6% -1.40.149 0.099 1.4% 0.40.128 0.089 -3.2% -1.40.265 0.181 -1.6% -0.40.030 0.020 7.1% 2.10.116 0.076 1.9% 0.80.370 0.253 -1.7% -0.60.122 0.085 -3.3% -1.00.105 0.100 4.2% 1.80.122 0.085 -3.3% -0.90.010 0.010 -4.3% -1.60.010 0.010 2.9% 0.90.010 0.010 -2.9% -1.00.010 0.010 -4.3% -1.9
average -0.1% -0.05stdev 3.8% 1.39
Determination of moisture content EEC 71/393 in feed stuffUncertainty by participation in intercomparisons
ζ1.22.2-1.50.6-1.3-0.62.80.7-0.7-1.32.1-1.3-2.11.4-1.4-2.1
-0.091.63
Value
± %
K 2.5 normal 2
D 0.5 rectangular 1.7320508075689
I 0.5 normal 2
R 1.2 rectangular 1.7320508075689
Mismatch loss uncertainties:
0.2 U-shaped 1.4142135623731
5.9 U-shaped 1.4142135623731
A 2.1 normal 2
normal
U normal (k=2)
Symbol Source of Uncertainty
Probability Distribution Divisor
Calibration factor at 18 GHz
Drift since last calibration
Instrumentation Uncertainty
50 MHz Reference spec.
M1 Sensor to 50 MHz Reference
M2 Sensor to 18 GHz Generator
Type-A Uncertainties
uC Combined Standard Uncertainty
Expanded Uncertainty
1 1.25
1 0.29
1 0.25
1 0.69
Mismatch loss uncertainties:
1 0.14
1 4.17
1 1.05
4.55
9.10
Ci
ui
± %
Parameter Value Standard Relative uncertaintyAbsolute
Uncertainty A
A 12 0.125 1.04% 12.125B 160 0.367 0.23% 160C 0.9998 0.00001 0.00% 0.9998D 0.45 0.003 0.67% 0.45
Result, y : 4265.81 1.26% Varieduy 53.66 Residual
UncertaintyRelative uncertaintyRelative contribution
B C D
12 12 12160.367 160 1600.9998 0.99981 0.9998
0.45 0.45 0.453
4310.25 4275.60 4265.86 4237.56-44.44 -9.78 -0.04 28.2553.56
1.24%68.8% 3.3% 0.0% 27.8%
Parameter Value StandardAbsolute
Uncertainty
A Purity P 0.999B 1 Weighing W (mg) 1100.0C 2 Weighing W (mg) 1000.0
D Pipetting 1mL
E Pip - Trueness 1.000F Pip Reproducibility 1.000
G Stock Solution 25mL
H Vol flask - Trueness 25.00I Vol flask Repeatability 25.00J Vol flask - Volume effect 25.00K Intermediate solution 25mL
L Vol flask - Trueness 25.00M Vol flask Repeatability 25.00N Vol flask - Volume effect 25.00
Result, y : 159.8uy
V1mL
V25mL
V25mL
Relative uncertainty
A B C D
Purity 1 Weighing 2 Weighing0.00058 0.000577928197387013 1.000 0.999 0.999
0.1155 0.000104972776216296 1100.00 1100.115 1100.000
0.1155 0.000115470053837925 1000.00 1000.000 1000.115
0.0029 0.00285773803324704 1.00 1.000 1.000
0.0100 0.01 1.00 1.000 1.000
0.0163 0.000653197264742181 25.00 25.000 25.000
0.010 0.0004 25.00 25.000 25.000
0.0212 0.00084870489570875 25.00 25.000 25.000
0.0163 0.000653197264742181 25.00 25.000 25.000
0.010 0.0004 25.00 25.000 25.000
0.0212 0.00084870489570875 25.00 25.000 25.000
1.05% Varied 159.9 160.0 159.71.69 Residual -0.09 -0.18 0.18
Contribution 0.3% 1.2% 1.2%Uncertainty 1.70
Relative uncertainty 1.06%
Purity
1 Weighing
2 Weighing
Pip - Trueness
Pip Reproducibility
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
Row 22
E F G H I J K L M
Pip - Tru Pip Reproducibility Vol flask Vol flask Vol flask - Volume efVol flask Vol flask 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
1100.000 1100.000 1100.000 1100.000 1100.000 1100.000 1100.000
1000.000 1000.000 1000.000 1000.000 1000.000 1000.000 1000.000
1.003 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
1.000 1.010 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
25.000 25.000 25.016 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000
25.000 25.000 25.000 25.01 25.000 25.000 25.000
25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.021 25.000 25.000
25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.016 25.000
25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.01
25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.021
160.3 161.4 159.7 159.8 159.7 159.7 159.8-0.46 -1.60 0.10 0.06 0.14 0.10 0.067.2% 88.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.6% 0.4% 0.1%
Purity
1 Weighing
2 Weighing
Pip - Trueness
Pip Reproducibility
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
Row 22
N
Vol flask - Volume effect0.999
1100.000
1000.000
1.000
1.000
25.000
25.000
25.000
25.000
25.000
25.021
159.70.14
0.6%
Step Step Distribution
1 Purity P 0.999 B -Rectangular2 Weighing W (mg) 100.0 B -Rectangular
3 Pipetting 1mL 1.000Pip - Trueness B -TriangularPip Reproducibility A - Normal
4 Stock Solution 25mL 25.00 B -RectangularVol flask - Trueness B -TriangularVol flask Repeatability A - NormalVol flask - Volume effect B -Rectangular
5 Intermediate solution 25mL 25.00
Concentration mg/L 159.8 Combined u
k=2 Expanded U
Concentration mg/L 159.8 Expanded U
Symbol/ unity
xi
V1mL
V25mL
V25mL
Purity
Weighing
Pipetting 1mL
Pip - Trueness
Pip Reproducibility
Stock Solution 25mL
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Relative Contr.
Comment
0.00058 0.06% 99,9% purity 0.29%0.1633 0.16% 0,2 mg limit 2.34%
0.0104 1.04%
0.0029 +/-0,007mL from specs 7.18%0.0100 0,01 mL repeatability 87.89%
0.0286 0.11%
0.0163 +/-0,04mL from specs 0.75%0.010 0,01 mL repeatability 0.28%0.0212 Volume coeff. Del. T = 14°C 1.27%
0.0286 0.11%
uc (%) 1.07% 1.70
U (%) 2.13% U (mg/L) 3.41
U (mg/L) 3.4
u(xi) u(xi) u(xi)/xContribu
tion
uc (mg/L)
Purity
Weighing
Pipetting 1mL
Pip - Trueness
Pip Reproducibility
Stock Solution 25mL
Vol flask - Trueness
Vol flask Repeatability
Vol flask - Volume effect
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Relative Contr.
Purity###
Weighing###
Pipetting 1mL###
Pip - Trueness###
Pip Reproducibility###
Stock Solution 25mL###
Vol flask - Trueness###
Vol flask Repeatability###
Vol flask - Volume effect###
Kragten Calibration of instrument
Quantity Value uReading A 0.1860 0.0003Zero reading B 0.0171 0.0002Calibration factor 1 C 0.9808 0.0012Calibration factor 2 D 1.2500 0.0005Correction factor E 0.0000 0.0004
Source
Estimate
Gauge block (ISO Gr. 2) 0.6 µm
Instrument reading resolution 1 µm
Instrument repeatability 0.5 µm
Temperature difference between parts 1 °C
8 °C
Unit of Measure of
Value
Coefficient of thermal deviation expansion CTE and temperature difference from 20 ºC
Validation against the following simple example by Dr. J Decker of the INMS Dimensional Metrology Program.Published at:Procedure:
1) From simplified example published by J Decker; PUMA Procedure - One Single Iteration:
dof Factor
Rectangular, B ¥ 1.732 0.60 0.346
Rectangular, B ¥ 3.464 1.00 0.289
normal, A 11 1.000 0.50 0.500
Rectangular, B ¥ 1.732 0.28 0.159
Rectangular, B ¥ 1.732 0.22 0.127
Combined Standard Uncertainty: 0.703
Expanded Uncertainty k=2: 1.4
Distribution and Evaluation Type
Uncertainty u(xi) (µm)
Standard uncertainty u (xi) (µm)
Gauge block (ISO Gr. 2)
Instrument reading resolution
Instrument repeatability
Temperature difference between parts
Coefficient of thermal deviation expansion CTE and temperature difference from 20 ºC
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Column I
Validation against the following simple example by Dr. J Decker of the INMS Dimensional Metrology Program.
1) From simplified example published by J Decker; PUMA Procedure - One Single Iteration:
Gauge block (ISO Gr. 2)
Instrument reading resolution
Instrument repeatability
Temperature difference between parts
Coefficient of thermal deviation expansion CTE and temperature difference from 20 ºC
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Column I
Contribution
24%
17%
51%
5%
3%
µm 2) From CLAS uncertainty template, using inputs from the example by J Decker.
µm
Gauge block (ISO Gr. 2)
Instrument reading resolution
Instrument repeatability
Temperature difference between parts
Coefficient of thermal deviation expansion CTE and temperature difference from 20 ºC
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Column I
Gauge block (ISO Gr. 2)
Instrument reading resolution
Instrument repeatability
Temperature difference between parts
Coefficient of thermal deviation expansion CTE and temperature difference from 20 ºC
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Column I
2) From CLAS uncertainty template, using inputs from the example by J Decker.