Post on 15-Feb-2017
anevidencereviewisaquickbutthoroughevalua5onoftheavailablescien5ficevidenceonanenvironmentalques5onitgivesdecisionmakersandadvocatesaccesstoresearchknowledgethatmayotherwisebehardtofindandinterpret
know what is known
evidencereviewsgivedecisionmakerseasytofollowanswerstoenvironmentalques5onstheideaisthatresearchknowledgeshouldsupportdecisionmakingandhelppredictrealoutcomes
calm the environmental debate
researchanddataanalysisexperienceiscombinedwithelementsofsystema5creviews,evidencehierarchies,andpolicyevalua5ontoolstocompilereviewsthereportstyleoutputhighlightsimportantevidence,separatesopinionsfromfactsandprovidesclarity
independent pragmatic advice
questions answered include
• Whataretheassump,onsinariskbasedeconomicresponsetonaturaldisasters?
• Whatistheevidenceforecologicalbenefitsofclearingofinvasivena,veshrubs
• DoescommunitysupportreducefarmersuicideratesinAustralia?
• Whatarethedesignissuesforsmall-scaleaquaponicssystems?
• Whatnewdirec,onswillenablesustainableuseofNSWsoils?
• Whatisbestprac,ceanalysisofgroundwaterhydrographs?
• Will‘naturalsequencefarming’rehabilitatefarms?
astandardevidencereviewtakes3to7daystosettheques5on,scantheliterature,evaluatethepublishedevidence,andcompilethekeyfindingsalloporusevidencereviewserviceshavesupportedpolicyanalysts,eNGOs,andbusinesses
rapid turnaround