EQUIP Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS

1Tequila WS, Amsterdam, 25-26 January 2001

Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS

EQUIPInter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS

István Cselényi, Niklas Borg ~ Telia Research AB, SwedenPéter Haraszti ~ eircom, Ireland

Hamid Gharib ~ British Telecom (BTexaCT), UK Petra Schmid ~ Telekom Austria, Austria

Tequila WS, Amsterdam, 25-26 January 2001

EQUIP - Eurescom P1008Participants• BT, eircom, Telefónica, Telekom Austria, TeliaTiming• February 2000 - March 2001Scope• technical and business models• metrics and measurements• interfaces

Project Objectives• To produce specifications of the technical and

business models, processes and interfaces needed to support automated inter-domain IP QoS management

• To capture requirements and possibilities for service performance and traffic measurements

Project Results1. State of the art study

~ project report, Q2 ‘00

2. Management scenarios and requirements ~ project report, Q3 ‘00

3. Measurement metrics and methodologies ~ technical information, Q4 ‘00

4. Interface and process specifications ~ technical specification, Q1 ‘01

Just an appetiser...

Background• Interconnected IP network operators trading

managed IP QoS, end-to-end• Bi-lateral Service Level Agreements (SLA)• QoS implemented in each operator’s domain

– IETF IntServ, DiffServ, MPLS or combination(s)• IP QoS scenarios

– basic IP QoS cross-connection, – VPN and – VoIP

Roles and InterfacesTrading Roles

– seller– buyer

Responsibilities– IP Network Domain– Service Provider– Service Customer– Service Customer’s

ClientInteraction

– Logical relationship between roles– Physical interfaces, protocols

Trade the components of IP QoS services just as in e-commerce

Service Customer

BB/OSS

Service Provider

IPND A

BB/OSS

IPND T

BB/OSS

IPND Z

Logical interface

Multi-Operator Trading Model

Service Customer ClientIP Network Domain

Service Provider

Physicalinterface

Service Customer

Management Interconnect Models (1)

Access (ingress) Access (egress)TransitServicecustomer

Business, Service& Network

ManagementFunctions

SLASLA

Cascade

Servicecustomer

client

Only provider – provider SLAs are shown.

Servicecustomer

client

ManagementFunctions

SLASLA

Servicecustomer

client

NetworkManagement

FunctionsNetwork

ManagementFunctions

NetworkManagement

Functions

SLASLASLA

‘I-operator’Customer

servicemanagement

functions

Interface Points (1)• Business perspective

business relationship between seller/buyer– service management

• Network perspectivephysical interfaces between systems

– configuration– performance management

• Plane-wise– control / management / user planes

IPND T

BB/OSSBB/OSS

ManagementPlane

BB/OSS

Access (ingress)

IPND A

Access (egress)Transit

Router Network Ctrl. IF

Protocol transfer

•IP Packet forwarding

•Business Management•Service Management•Network Management•Network Element- Management B B

Router Network Ctrl. IF

Service Provider

•Routing•Signaling•Shaping•Marking•Policing•CAC•Metering

ControlPlane

UserPlane IPND T

Interface Points (2)B

Service Provision Processes

• identification• advertisement• (re)negotiation• activation/configuration• maintenance/monitoring/reporting• deactivation

Buyer/(Customer)

Seller/(Provider)

Traffic Conditioning SpecificationService Description

Traffic Forecast

Basic Trading Model

1. Service Description (SD)• Service Name,• Service Performance Parameters (edge- to-

edge delay, jitter, loss),• Pipe | Funnel | Hose info propagation model,• Provisioning (static, by RSVP, by BB, by

both),• Service Code Mark(s) (DSCP(s)),• Action On Non-Conforming Traffic (drop,

shape, remark)

2. Traffic Conditioning Specification (TCS)• SLS Reference• SD Reference,• Traffic Descriptor (source/ dest.)• Traffic Profile (rate, burst size)• Scope (ingress, egress)

3. Traffic Forecast (TF)• TCS Reference• Projected Increase/ Decrease• Time

Information Propagation Models

Funnel

(*, Dest) (*, Dest)

Access (egress)Access (ingress) TransitSe

(Src, Dest) (Src, Dest)

(*,*) (*,*)

Just a component of the SLA – not a management interconnect model!

Trading Example ~ IP QoS Cross-Connection ~• Similar to a BE transit service, but with defined QoS• End-to-end QoS• Service Customer can be:

• DiffServ and/or IntServ aware • neither DiffServ nor IntServ aware

IntServIntServ DiffServ

CRERER

CRBR BR

Service Performance Measurement

• Scenarios• Measurement Points• Metrics and Events• Measurement Methodologies• Reporting

Business Perspective

BB/OSSIPND A

SellerService Provider

IPND A

BB/OSSIPND T

IPND T

BB/OSSIPND Z

IPND Z

End-to-End Scenario (1)

IPND TRouter

Network

IPND ZRouter

Network

IPND ARouter

Network

End-to-end Service Performance

Network Perspective

Traffic Profile

2 3 4 5 6

End-to-End Scenario (2)

Business Perspective

SellerService

Provider T

BuyerService

Provider A

ServiceProvider Z

BB/OSSIPND A

IPND A

BB/OSSIPND T

IPND T

BB/OSSIPND Z

IPND Z

Transit Scenario (1)

IPND TRouter

Network

IPND ZRouter

Network

IPND ARouter

Network

Transit Service Performance

Network Perspective

Traffic Profile

2 3 4 5 6

Transit Scenario (2)

Access Network

IPND A

IPND ABB / OSS

CPE LADP LES CACBSS ER BR

MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MP5 MP6

ER - edge router LES - local exchange switch CPE - customer premises equipmentBR - border router MP* - Measurement Point CAC - connection admission controlCR - core router BB - Bandwidth Broker BSS - broadband service selection router

OSS - Operation Support System LADP - local access distribution point

Measurement Points

Provider – Service Performance Metrics• availability + throughput• delay + jitter• loss

Metrics and Events

Customer – Traffic Profile Metrics• peak rate• maximum burst size• token bucket parameters

IPND TRouter

Network

IPND ZRouter

Network

IPND ARouter

Network

End-to-end Service Performance

Traffic Profile

23 4 5 6

Summary• Goal

– automated SLS management system• Delivered results

– State of the art study – Management scenarios and requirements– Measurement metrics and methodologies

• Current work– Specify an inter-domain QoS management interface

Future WorkEURESCOM P1103• The goal is to validate, extend and enhance the Inter-

operator IP QoS provisioning framework of P1008 from both technical and business perspectives

• Two case studies– compatibility with PSTN telephony services (e.g., IN service,

Value Added services, control protocol aspects)– UMTS – IP QoS interoperability

• Identifying accounting and pricing requirements and cost principles for this service (e.g., Support QoS rebates, etc);

InformationProject members here at the WS:István Cselényi (Istvan.I.Cselenyi@telia.se)

Niklas Borg (Niklas.G.Borg@telia.se)Telia Research AB, Sweden

Péter Haraszti (Peter.Haraszti@broadcom.ie)eircom, Ireland

Hamid Gharib (hamid.gharib@bt.com)British Telecom (BTexaCT), UK

Petra Schmid (Petra.Schmid@telekom.at)Telekom Austria, Austria

Project homepage: http://www.eurescom.de/public/projects/P1000-series/p1008/P1008.htm

ThanksTelekom Austria

• Petra Schmid

• Armin Sumesgutner

British Telecom, UK

• Hamid Gharib

• Chris Hatch

• Dave Milham

Telefónica, Spain

• Vicente Cruz

• Sonia Escudero

Telia Research, Sweden

• Anders Bergsten

• Niklas Borg

• István Cselényi

eircom, Ireland

• Ludovic Fiard

• Péter Haraszti

• Andrew Kelleher

• Denis McCarthy

• Garett Thompson

EQUIP Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS

Documents

Transcript of EQUIP Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS

End-To-End QoS Concept and Architecture(3gpp R9)

End-2-End QoS Provisioning in UMTS networkskom.aau.dk/group/04gr995/Report/UMTSQoSReport_v8.pdf · End-2-End QoS Provisioning in UMTS networks Haibo Wang Devendra Prasad January 12,

END-TO-END QOS COMPUTATION FOR VERTICAL …digital.library.ryerson.ca/islandora/object/RULA:4221/datastream... · END-TO-END QOS COMPUTATION FOR VERTICAL SERVICE COMPOSITION IN THE

end to end QoS for video delivery over wireless internet

End-to-End QoS in Mobile Networks v1 - Portugal Chapterportugal.chapters.comsoc.org/files/2016/01/Slides_Talk_13_1.pdf · End-to-End QoS in Mobile Networks ... RNC SEC GW PCRF AAA

Automation of end-to-end QOS

End-2-End QoS Internet

Architecture of End-to-End QoS for VoIP Call Processing in ...qofis.ccaba.upc.edu/pdf/Architecture of End-to-End QoS for VoIP... · Architecture of End-to-End QoS for VoIP Call Processing

End-to-end User-centric session with QoS continuity€¦ · End-to-end User-centric session with QoS continuity Speaker: Yijun WU Noëmie SIMONI TELECOM ParisTech Computer of Science

End-To-End Quality of Service (QoS) Concept and Architecture

Ensuring end to end Broadband QoS on FTTx

Service selection algorithms for Web services with end-to-end QoS

End-to-End QoS Measurement: Analytic of Application Response

End-to-End QoS Network Design - pearsoncmg.comptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9781587143694/samplepages/... · Cisco Press 800 East 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46240 End-to-End QoS

End-to-end QoS in IP Multimedia Subsystem

Applying Adaptive Middleware to Manage End-to-End QoS …schmidt/PDF/CC.pdf · Applying Adaptive Middleware to Manage End-to-End QoS for Next-generation Distributed Applications Christopher

Enhancing End-to-End QoS for Multimedia Streaming in IMS ...

QoS Design and Deployment ford2zmdbbm9feqrf.cloudfront.net/2014/usa/pdf/BRKRST-2515.pdf · QoS Design and Deployment for Wireless LANs ... • End-to-End QoS Network Design, 2nd ...

Dynamic End-To-End QoS Management for Advanced RF ... · AFFTC-PA-11212 Dynamic End-To-End QoS Management for Advanced RF Telemetry Networks Andrzej Cichocki, Mariusz A. Fecko, John

DDS QoS Unleashed - Object Management Group · ‣ End-to-end properties controlled by QoS are related to temporal and spatial aspects of data distribution ‣ Some QoS-Policies are